Supraventricular tachycardia: diagnosis and current acute management

Medical Management of Infants With Supraventricular Tachycardia: Results From a Registry and Review of the Literature

Background

Several medication choices are available for acute and prophylactic treatment of refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in infants. There are almost no controlled trials, and medication choices are not necessarily evidence based. Our objective was to report the effectiveness of management strategies for infant SVT.

Methods

A registry of infants admitted to hospital with re-entrant SVT and no haemodynamically significant heart disease were prospectively followed at 11 international tertiary care centres. In addition, a systematic review of studies on infant re-entrant SVT in MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. Data on demographics, symptoms, acute and maintenance treatments, and outcomes were collected.

Results

A total of 2534 infants were included: n = 108 from the registry (median age, 9 days [0-324 days], 70.8% male) and n = 2426 from the literature review (median age, 14 days; 62.3% male). Propranolol was the most prevalent acute (61.4%) and maintenance treatment (53.8%) in the Registry, whereas digoxin was used sparingly (4.0% and 3.8%, respectively). Propranolol and digoxin were used frequently in the literature acutely (31% and 33.2%) and for maintenance (17.8% and 10.1%) (P < 0.001). No differences in acute or prophylactic effectiveness between medications were observed. Recurrence was higher in the Registry (25.0%) vs literature (13.4%) (P < 0.001), and 22 (0.9%) deaths were reported in the literature vs none in the Registry.

Conclusion

This was the largest cohort of infants with SVT analysed to date. Digoxin monotherapy use was rare amongst contemporary paediatric cardiologists. There was limited evidence to support one medication over another. Overall, recurrence and mortality rates on antiarrhythmic treatment were low.

Antiarrhythmic Treatment Duration and Tachycardia Recurrence in Infants with Supraventricular Tachycardia

We sought to assess the effect of a shorter medication treatment course (up to 4-6 months of age) on the recurrence of infantile supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This was a retrospective review of infants with SVT diagnosed at age 0-12 months at Rady Children's Hospital (2010-2017). Infants with structural congenital heart disease, automatic tachycardias, atrial flutter, or lack of follow-up data were excluded. Seventy-four infants met criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 6 days (IQR 0-21 days); 28.4% presented with fetal tachycardia. Median gestational age was 38.4 weeks (IQR 36-40), 30% were preterm. Median age at medication discontinuation was 6.7 months (IQR 4.6-9.8). Therapy was stopped at younger age in patients managed by pediatric electrophysiologist (vs. general pediatric cardiologist): 4.9 vs. 8.6 months (p = 0.03). Thirty-eight patients (51.4%) were treated for < 6 months; 32.4% for 6-12 months, and 16.2% for > 12 months. SVT recurrence was similar for these groups: 13.2% vs. 16.7%, and 33.3%, respectively, (p = 0.27). Most patients with recurrence required emergency care, though none had significant adverse outcomes. Infants with SVT and structurally normal cardiac anatomy, who remain recurrence free on a single agent, have no increased risk of recurrence with shorter treatment courses of 4-6 months, compared to traditional treatment duration of 6-12 months.

The Study of Antiarrhythmic Medications in Infancy (SAMIS)

Background—

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is one of the most common conditions requiring emergent cardiac care in children, yet its management has never been subjected to a randomized controlled clinical trial. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the 2 most commonly used medications for antiarrhythmic prophylaxis of SVT in infants: digoxin and propranolol.

Methods and Results—

This was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of infants <4 months with SVT (atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia), excluding Wolff-Parkinson-White, comparing digoxin with propranolol. The primary end point was recurrence of SVT requiring medical intervention. Time to recurrence and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Sixty-one patients completed the study, 27 randomized to digoxin and 34 to propranolol. SVT recurred in 19% of patients on digoxin and 31% of patients on propranolol ( P =0.25). No first recurrence occurred after 110 days of treatment. The 6-month recurrence-free status was 79% for patients on digoxin and 67% for patients on propranolol ( P =0.34), and there were no first recurrences in either group between 6 and 12 months. There were no deaths and no serious adverse events related to study medication.

Conclusions—

There was no difference in SVT recurrence in infants treated with digoxin versus propranolol. The current standard practice may be treating infants longer than required and indicates the need for a placebo-controlled trial.

Clinical Trial Registration Information—

http://clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT-00390546.

High-dose sotalol is safe and effective in neonates and infants with refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose sotalol in neonates and infants with refractory supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). SVT in neonates and infants can be refractory to primary therapies; therefore, secondary agents, e.g., sotalol, are often required to obtain control of SVT. Age-factor nomogram dosing of sotalol is widely used; however, our institution uses greater doses based on body surface area (approximately 150-200 mg/m(2)/d). A retrospective review of 78 inpatients receiving sotalol, after failing another antiarrthymic medication, at our institution from 2001 to 2008 was performed. Corrected QT intervals (QTc), 24-h Holter-monitoring results, and outpatient records were reviewed to assess safety and efficacy for patients ≤ 2 years of age. Median patient age at the time of initiation of therapy was 24 days (range 3-728). Forty-eight patients (62%) were neonates, and 36 (46%) had congenital heart disease. The median sotalol dosage was 152 mg/m(2)/day (range 65-244). The SVT of 70 patients (90%) was controlled with sotalol. No patients experienced significant QTc prolongation or proarrhythmia. Mean duration of follow-up was 3.3 ± 0.24 years. High-dose sotalol allows for safe and rapid control of refractory tachyarrhythmias in this young age group.

Medications used to manage supraventricular tachycardia in the infant a North American survey

Supraventricular tachycardia is the most common pediatric arrhythmia, but there is no consensus and little evidence to guide its treatment. We sent a questionnaire to pediatric cardiologists in North America to assess the current practice pattern. Of 1534 surveys mailed, 352 (23%) were returned and 295 (19%) had complete data for analysis. In the acute setting, 11 different medications were chosen. The most commonly used in the infant without preexcitation were digoxin (42%), procainamide (21%), esmolol (13%), propranolol (10%), and amiodarone (8%). In the infant with preexcitation, propranolol (34%), procainamide (23%), esmolol (17%), amiodarone (11%), and digoxin (6%) were used. In the chronic setting, 8 different medications were chosen. The most commonly used in this scenario were digoxin (52%), propranolol (33%), amiodarone (4%), and sotalol (3%). In the infant with preexcitation, propranolol (70%), amiodarone (6%), digoxin (6%), atenolol (6%), and flecainide (5%) were used. Medication choices were influenced by additional electrophysiology training and preexcitation. Digoxin was used less in the setting of preexcitation. There are no comparative trials to explain the different medication choices. Although a number of medications may be efficacious, a randomized clinical trial is needed to offer further guidance.

Pharmacologic considerations in the neonate with congenital heart disease

Advances in knowledge about the developing cardiovascular system and compensatory physiologic changes that occur in infants with congenital heart disease have led to new approaches in the management of cardiac failure and arrhythmias. Information about the pharmacologic effects, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of newer agents used in the management of congenital heart disease have led to more appropriate use of these medications to prolong survival and improve outcomes.

Is hospitalization necessary for treatment of SVT? Predictive variables for recurrence and negative outcome

In this article we attempt to identify variables that may predict which pediatric patients presenting with supraventricular tachycardia to the emergency department are at risk for immediate recurrence or negative outcome. We studied an 11-year chart review and follow-up of pediatric patients presenting to the pediatric ED with a diagnosis of SVT. Recurrences of SVT during the first 24 hours after initial episode and occurrences of negative outcome (ie, respiratory distress, cardiac arrest) during hospital stay were measured. 51 patients met our inclusion criteria: 74.5% were treated as inpatients. 18% experienced a recurrence during 24 hours; 3 patients were less than 3 months of age. Recurrence within 90 minutes of conversion occurred in 4/7 patients. All negative outcomes (3.9%) occurred in the less than 3-month age group. Patients less than 3 months or with immediate supraventricular tachycardia recurrence may have a higher probability of recurrence and negative outcome and therefore may require hospitalization.

Prenatal diagnosis of a familial form of junctional ectopic tachycardia

Junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is a rare cardiac arrhythmia characterized by atrio-ventricular dissociation, a high rate junctional escape rhythm and poor clinical tolerance in neonates and infants. Sudden infant death has been reported. The intra-uterine presentation of this arrhythmia is unknown. We report a familial form of JET with antenatal diagnosis. A sustained tachycardia at a rate of 170 beats/min with a 1:1 conduction was diagnosed in a hydropic fetus at a gestational age of 32 weeks. The older brother had presented with prenatal hydrops and junctional ectopic tachycardia was diagnosed at birth. Assuming that this arrhythmia was a JET, amiodarone was given to the mother in order to control the fetal tachycardia. The arrhythmia persisted with a 1/1 pattern but at a slower ventricular rate (140 beats/min). The ECG performed at birth revealed a narrow QRS tachycardia with a ventricular rate of 180 beats/min and a 1/1 retrograde conduction. Amiodarone therapy was continued with the addition of propanolol. Postnatal echocardiography revealed normal chambers and left ventricular dysfunction with a left ventricular shortening fraction of 17 per cent. Subsequent ECGs and Holter monitoring demonstrated typical electrocardiographic features of JET. Both parents had a normal ECG and Holter monitoring. A fetal tachycardia of moderately high rate with a 1/1 retrograde conduction and poor cardiac tolerance can be due to JET. In such cases, the use of amiodarone can be considered as a first line drug.

Recognition and management of childhood cardiac arrhythmias

Cardiac arrhythmias are common in children, but most of them are benign and do not signify underlying heart disease. However, the main tachyarrhythmias (SVT and VT) can cause cardiovascular collapse, and should therefore be treated promptly. Drug treatment is generally effective and is appropriate in stable patients. DC shock is the treatment of choice in patients with compromised circulation. There is a wide array of antiarrhythmic drugs and though they are generally safe, most of them have the potential for serious adverse effects. Hence, there is a need to exercise caution and balanced judgement in prescribing them. It is perhaps best for the general duty paediatric staff to be familiar with a select few, and stick to them if possible. Management of most cases of cardiac arrhythmia in children is within the competence of non-cardiologist paediatric staff. But in some instances cardiology referral will be required, either for further investigations, for decision regarding longterm drug therapy, or for more technical management modalities.

Safety issues in the treatment of paediatric supraventricular tachycardias

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia caused by atrioventricular re-entry is the most frequent arrhythmia in children of all age groups. It represents the most frequent clinical situation where antiarrhythmic drug therapy has to be considered in a child. Acute termination of an episode of tachycardia in all paediatric age groups is nowadays best achieved with an intravenous bolus injection of adenosine. Since the introduction of adenosine into clinical practice, the need to proceed to electrocardioversion has been limited to the infant (or in rare cases an older child) with severe cardiovascular collapse. In the haemodynamically stable infant or child, several other antiarrhythmic agents such as flecainide or propafenone can be used with relative safety and with a high probability of immediate success. The same is true for verapamil, although intravenous administration should be avoided in the first year of life. In newborns and in infants with first presentation of an episode of tachycardia, drug prophylaxis of recurrences is usually recommended for the whole of the first year of life. Prophylactic treatment may consist of oral digoxin as first choice, with a beta-blocker as an alternative. In an infant with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome it may be wise to avoid digoxin and to start treatment with a beta-blocker. Antiarrhythmic class Ic drugs such as propafenone or flecainide, and the class III agent sotalol, are widely used as the next steps of therapy when digoxin and beta-blockers fail to prevent recurrences. These agents are about equivalent with regard to their efficacy and risk profile. Amiodarone is considered to be an agent that should be reserved for use in situations when the tachycardia is refractory to the previously named agents. Older children may commence treatment with a beta-blocker and the subsequent steps of treatment are the same as those for infants. Curative catheter ablation of accessory pathways has been shown to be as efficient and well tolerated in the paediatric age group as it is in adults. This treatment option is nowadays quite often offered to older children. However, in infants and smaller children, ablation is used as a last resort. Rare forms of paediatric supraventricular tachycardia (other than atrioventricular re-entry through the atrioventricular node or accessory pathways) are occasionally difficult to treat and present special problems. For each of these arrhythmias, a specially tailored individual therapeutic approach is needed.

Pharmacologic management of supraventricular tachycardias in children. Part 1: Wolff-Parkinson-White and atrioventricular nodal reentry

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding the use of antiarrhythmic agents in the management of Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) in infants and children, and to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of specific agents in each arrhythmia in an effort to develop treatment guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search encompassing the years 1966-1996 was used to identify pertinent literature for discussion. Additional references were found in the articles that were retrieved via MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials that address the use of antiarrhythmic agents for the treatment of the supraventricular tachycardias WPW and AVNRT in children were selected. Literature pertaining to dosage, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity of antiarrhythmic agents in children were considered for possible inclusion in the review, and information judged to be pertinent by the authors was included in the discussion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Although there are numerous reports of antiarrhythmic use in children, very few large studies are designed to evaluate an individual antiarrhythmic agent for a specific arrhythmia. Controlled, comparison trials of antiarrhythmic agents in children are virtually nonexistent. Ideally, controlled clinical trials are used to develop clinical guidelines; however, in this situation, most data and information must be obtained from case series of children treated. Although the results from these type of studies may be useful in developing guidelines for the optimal use of these agents, controlled trials are required for establishing standard treatment guidelines for all patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Despite limited scientific evaluation of conventional agents in the treatment of WPW and AVNRT in children, they continue to be used as standard of care. Most information regarding the use of conventional agents in children has been extrapolated from the adult literature. Little justification for the use of agents or dosing in children is available. Controlled trials regarding the use of new antiarrhythmic agents (propafenone, amiodarone, flecainide) are available; however, the variance in dosing schemes, presence of structural heart disease, and patient age make the development of recommendations difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of greater clinical experience with these conventional antiarrhythmic agents, they continue to be first-line therapy in the management of most supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in children. The management of SVT in children with WPW syndrome should begin with the use of a beta-blocker with the addition of digoxin or procainamide for treatment failures. The use of digoxin monotherapy, although frequently used by many practitioners in infants and children with WPW, cannot be recommended. For failures to conventional agents, flecainide is the preferred agent, while therapy with propafenone, amiodarone, and sotalol remains to be elucidated. The management of AVRNT is similar to that of WPW; however, digoxin is the agent of first choice. Trials of beta-blockers and procainamide should follow for treatment failures with flecainide again being the preferred "newer" antiarrhythmic for use in resistant cases. Additional well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the comparative efficacy of antiarrhythmics in the management of WPW and AVNRT in children, as well as to evaluate dosing and toxicity in various age groups.

Fetal tachycardia: mechanisms and predictors of hydrops fetalis

OBJECTIVES

This study had three objectives: 1) to determine the electrophysiologic mechanisms of fetal supraventricular tachycardia at presentation and postnatally; 2) to identify the clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of hydrops fetalis; and 3) to describe the medium-term follow-up (1 to 7 years) of patients with fetal supraventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND

Fetal supraventricular tachycardia causes significant fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Prenatal analysis and postnatal confirmation of fetal supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms have been limited.

METHODS

Supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms were evaluated by prenatal Doppler/M-mode echocardiography, immediate neonatal surface electrocardiography and postnatal transesophageal electrophysiologic procedures in 30 consecutive patients presenting with fetal supraventricular tachycardia (17 managed prenatally, 13 first managed postnatally).

RESULTS

The fetal supraventricular tachycardia mechanism was 1:1 atrioventricular conduction in 22 patients and supraventricular tachycardia with atrioventricular block (atrial flutter) in 8. At the postnatal transesophageal electrophysiologic procedure, tachycardia was induced in 27 of 30 patients; atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in 25 (93%) of 27 and intraatrial reentrant tachycardia in only 2 (7%) of 27. Hydrops was present in 12 of 30 fetuses. Sustained supraventricular tachycardia (> 12 h) and lower gestation at presentation correlated with hydrops (p < 0.02, p < 0.05), but mechanism of tachycardia and heart rate did not. Gestational age at delivery was significantly greater in those who received intrauterine management (39 +/- 1.3 vs. 37 +/- 2.9 weeks, p = 0.04) despite earlier presentation (32.6 vs. 37.1 weeks). Cesarean section deliveries were reduced in the same group (3 of 17 vs. 11 of 13, p = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia was the predominant mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia in the fetus. There was a high association of supraventricular tachycardia with atrioventricular block in utero and accessory atrioventricular connections. Outcome at 1 to 7 years was excellent regardless of severity of illness at clinical presentation.

Efficacy and risks of medical therapy for supraventricular tachycardia in neonates and infants

To assess the efficacy and safety of current pharmacologic therapy for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in infants, we reviewed 112 infants treated between July 1985 and March 1993. The SVT mechanism was determined by esophageal electrophysiologic study and involved an accessory pathway in 86, atrioventricular (AV) node reentry in 10, atrial muscle reentry in 11, and an ectopic atrial tachycardia in 5 patients. Of six infants not treated, none had clinical recurrences of SVT. Of the 106 patients treated, 70% remained free of tachycardia while receiving digoxin, propranolol, or both. Class I antiarrhythmic agents were necessary for 13 patients, and class III agents were required for another 13 infants. Verapamil was used in one infant with AV node reentry tachycardia. Nine infants with complex clinical presentations were believed to have failed medical management and underwent radiofrequency ablation. Five patients died, four of complications related to structural heart disease and one shortly after radiofrequency ablation was performed. No deaths appeared to be related to antiarrhythmic medications. No drug-related side effects requiring medication change occurred, and no proarrhythmia was observed. Thus medical therapy appears to be effective and safe in infants with SVT. Radiofrequency ablation should be reserved for rare infants who fail aggressive medical regimens or when the situation is complicated by ventricular dysfunction, severe symptoms, or complex congenital heart disease.

Digoxin or flecainide for prophylaxis of supraventricular tachycardia in infants?

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the safety and efficacy of digoxin and flecainide in the prophylaxis of supraventricular tachycardia in infants.

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of supraventricular tachycardia in infants is common. Digoxin is the conventional drug of first choice for prophylaxis, but its efficacy has not been tested in a controlled clinical trial, and there is no consensus on the drug of choice when digoxin is ineffective.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the records of all infants with supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular (AV) reentry admitted to our hospital between January 1986 and December 1993.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine infants presented with sustained AV reentrant tachycardia at age 1 to 330 days (median 12). Intravenous flecainide was required to maintain immediate control in six patients who were then treated with oral flecainide. The other 33 patients were treated with oral digoxin. There was no recurrence of tachycardia in 14 (42%) of the 33 patients (95% confidence interval [CI] 25% to 61%). In the other 19 patients (58%) (95% CI 39% to 75%), digoxin was replaced by oral flecainide because of multiple recurrence of tachycardia. Full control was achieved in all 19 of these patients (100%) (95% CI 82% to 100%) and in 5 of the 6 patients treated with both intravenous and oral flecainide. Thus, overall, flecainide was effective in 24 (96%) of 25 patients (95% CI 80% to 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison with previous natural history studies suggests that digoxin is ineffective in the prophylaxis of supraventricular tachycardia. Oral flecainide was effective in a small number of infants, with no adverse effects (95% CI 0% to 12%), and may now be preferred as the primary prophylactic agent.

Adenosine-tri-phosphate treatment for supraventricular tachycardia in infants

Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside acting on coronary perfusion and myocardial conduction. Although the anti-arrhythmic effects of adenosine have been known for decades, interest in the use of adenosine or adenosine-triphosphate (ATP) (a precursor of adenosine) in termination of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has been renewed. We studied the use of striadyne (ATP and a mixture of other nucleosides including adenosine) in 22 infants younger than 6 months in order to evaluate efficiency and safety of the drug in this particular age group. Striadyne stopped SVT in 17 cases and was diagnostic in another 4 cases. Ten out of 17 successfully converted infants showed one or more reinitiations of SVT, which were easily controlled. The results support the efficiency of ATP for the termination of re-entry types of tachycardia, as well as its diagnostic value and its lack of serious side-effects.

Cardiac evaluation of infants. The first year of life

Many structural congenital heart defects present at birth, and most are diagnosed by 1 year of age. Arrhythmias also are common during this time and may be particularly problematic. Identification of infants who may have a serious underlying congenital heart defect is important because many require prompt medical and surgical treatment. This article is a guide to the clinical findings that may assist the practitioner in the evaluation of infants with potential cardiac problems.

Adenosine triphosphate treatment for supraventricular tachycardia in infants

Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside acting on coronary perfusion and myocardial conduction. Although the anti-arrhythmic effects of adenosine have been known for decades, interest in the use of adenosine or adenosine triphosphate (ATP- a precursor of adenosine) in termination of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) has been renewed. We studied the use of Striadyne (ATP and a mixture of other nucleosides including adenosine) in 22 infants younger than 6 months in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of the drug in this particular age group. Striadyne stopped SVT in 17 cases and was diagnostic in another 4 cases. Ten out of 17 successfully converted infants showed one or more reinitiations of SVT, which were easily controlled. The results support the efficacy of ATP for the termination of re-entry types of tachycardia, as well as its diagnostic value and its lack of serious side-effects.

CONCLUSION

Adenosine or ATP could be the drug of choice for the treatment of junctional tachycardia in infants after vagal manoeuvres have failed. Provided continuous ECG monitoring is performed during injection, adenosine or ATP may be diagnostic in other types of supraventricular tachycardia and even in wide-complex tachycardia. We suggest a bolus injection of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg to be used prior to transport to the paediatric cardiology unit.

Adenosine in the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in children

Intravenous bolus adenosine was given to four pediatric patients aged 1 month to 8 years who had paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia that had not responded to conventional medical therapy. Adenosine (one to three doses) was successful in converting the arrhythmia to normal sinus rhythm in all four cases, and no side effects of the drug were noted.