Efficacy and safety of adrenocorticotropic hormone gel in refractory dermatomyositis and polymyositis

A comprehensive review of dermatomyositis treatments - from rediscovered classics to promising horizons

INTRODUCTION

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare inflammatory disease with diverse cutaneous and systemic manifestations, often associated with myositis-specific antibodies. Managing patients with refractory DM, or individuals presenting pecific complications, like calcinosis or rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, presents unique challenges.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores current and promising treatment options for DM, drawing from clinical studies, case series, and case reports that consider the underlying disease pathophysiology.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advancements have improved our understanding and management of DM. The discovery of distinct DM autoantibodies and their correlation with specific clinical phenotypes has transformed patient categorization and enhanced our knowledge of the pathogenesis of the disease. Intravenous immunoglobulin, a well-established treatment in dermatomyositis, has regained prominence and a large randomized clinical trial has reaffirmed its efficacy, confirming it as an effective therapeutic option in this group of patients. Identification of the type I interferon pathway as a key pathogenic mechanism in DM has opened up new avenues for more effective treatment strategies. Blocking the JAK/STAT pathway offers potential for improved management of refractory patients and prevention of highly morbid complications. These recent advancements have significantly impacted the management and care of dermatomyositis patients, enabling tailored approaches, targeted interventions, and improved outcomes for individuals affected by this complex condition.

Acthar® Gel Treatment for Patients with Autoimmune and Inflammatory Diseases: An Historical Perspective and Characterization of Clinical Evidence

Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides that is believed to have both steroidogenic and nonsteroidogenic immunomodulatory effects via activation of melanocortin receptors in various cells throughout the body. Since 1952, Acthar has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Since 2014, Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals has conducted a large number of preclinical, clinical, and real-world-evidence studies of Acthar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis and polymyositis, multiple sclerosis relapse, ophthalmic disorders, sarcoidosis, and nephrotic syndrome. To date, Acthar has been the subject of more than 500 publications, many of which demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Acthar in patients with inflammatory diseases for whom standard treatments were ineffective or intolerable. Here, we review the history of Acthar and the findings of studies that have investigated the mechanism of action, safety, efficacy, and real-world effectiveness of Acthar for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

The Melanocortin System in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Insights into Its Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potentials

The melanocortin system is a complex set of molecular mediators and receptors involved in many physiological and homeostatic processes. These include the regulation of melanogenesis, steroidogenesis, neuromodulation and the modulation of inflammatory processes. In the latter context, the system has assumed importance in conditions of chronic digestive inflammation, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), in which numerous experiences have been accumulated in mouse models of colitis. Indeed, information on how such a system can counteract colitis inflammation and intervene in the complex cytokine imbalance in the intestinal microenvironment affected by chronic inflammatory damage has emerged. This review summarises the evidence acquired so far and highlights that molecules interfering with the melanocortin system could represent new drugs for treating IBD.

Acthar Gel (RCI): A Narrative Literature Review of Clinical and Economic Evidence

Acthar^® Gel (repository corticotropin injection [RCI]) is a naturally sourced complex mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides used to treat patients with serious and rare inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. This narrative review summarizes the key clinical and economic findings among 9 indications: infantile spasms (IS), multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), dermatomyositis and polymyositis (DM/PM), ocular inflammatory diseases (primarily uveitis and severe keratitis), symptomatic sarcoidosis, and proteinuria in nephrotic syndrome (NS). Key studies of clinical efficacy and healthcare resource utilization and cost from 1956 to 2022 are discussed. Evidence supports the efficacy of RCI across all 9 indications. RCI is recommended as first-line treatment for IS and is associated with improved outcomes for the other 8 indications, including increased recovery rates in MS relapse; improved disease control in RA, SLE, and DM/PM; real-world effectiveness in patients with uveitis and severe keratitis; improved lung function and reduced corticosteroid use in symptomatic sarcoidosis; and increased rates of partial remission of proteinuria in NS. For many indications, RCI may improve clinical outcomes during exacerbations or when conventional treatments have failed to show a benefit. RCI is also associated with a reduction in the use of biologics, corticosteroids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Economic data suggest RCI is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for MS relapse, RA, and SLE. Other economic benefits have been demonstrated for IS, MS relapses, RA, SLE, and DM/PM, including reduced hospitalizations, lengths of stay, inpatient and outpatient services, and emergency department visits. RCI is considered safe and effective and features economic benefits for numerous indications. Its ability to control relapse and disease activity makes RCI an important nonsteroid treatment option that could help preserve functioning and well-being among patients with inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

A Narrative Review of Acthar Gel for the Treatment of Myositis

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are autoimmune disorders characterized by symmetric proximal muscle weakness and chronic inflammation, with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. The current standard of care includes traditional immunosuppressive pharmacotherapies; however, some patients cannot tolerate or do not adequately respond to these therapies, highlighting the need for alternative treatments for refractory disease. Acthar^® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) is a naturally sourced mixture of adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs and other pituitary peptides that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 1952 for use in patients with two subgroups of IIMs, dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM). However, it has not been routinely used in the treatment of IIMs. While Acthar may induce steroidogenesis, it also has a steroid-independent mechanism of action by exerting immunomodulatory effects through the activation of melanocortin receptors on immune cells, such as macrophages, B cells, and T cells. Recent clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and case reports add to the growing evidence suggesting that Acthar may be effective in patients with DM and PM. Here we review the current evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of Acthar for the treatment of refractory DM and PM.

FDA-APPROVED INDICATIONS OF ADRENOCORTICOTROPIC HORMONE (ACTH) AS A DRUG: DOES IT HAVE A PLACE IN DISEASE MANAGEMENT TODAY?

ACTH is a pituitary hormone important for proper function of adrenal glands, cortisol production as well as human physiology in general.  It is involved in the pathogenesis of several endocrine disorders like Cushing syndrome and can be a useful diagnostic tool for diseases like primary adrenal insufficiency.  Although popular as a hormone in endocrine system physiology and testing, ACTH has been used as a drug since the 1950s.  Except for steroid-releasing properties, its mechanism of action involves a steroid-independent anti-inflammatory and possible immune-modulatory effect.  Pharmaceutic ACTH has a wide range of indications approved by FDA and usually comes in the form of subcutaneous injections.  In this narrative review, we accumulated what we considered as important data from reviews, cases and trials involving the most basic FDA-approved ACTH indications.  A special emphasis was given on rheumatologic indications of ACTH.  More large data studies need to be performed to assess ACTH usefulness, efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness as a drug.  

Past, Present, and Future in Dermatomyositis Therapeutics

Purpose of review

This review highlights current and emerging pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM). Current clinical evidence, in addition to recently published and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in development, are summarized in this review.

Recent findings

There has been significant progress in the research and development of potential treatments in DM. The FDA recently approved Octagam® 10% Immune Globulin Intravenous (IVIg) for the treatment of DM. Several drug targets are being explored as viable therapeutic options in phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials; at the forefront of these are JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib and baricitinib) and T-cell co-stimulation blockers (i.e. abatacept). In addition, clinical trials are currently under way for therapeutics targeting novel molecular pathways, including immunoproteasome inhibitors, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, complement inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors.

Summary

With the large number of clinical trials, multiple novel therapeutics in development, and improved classification and outcome measures, the treatment landscape for DM will continue to rapidly evolve in the coming years as more options become available.

Emerging Therapeutics in the Management of Connective Tissue Disease. Part II. Dermatomyositis and Scleroderma

The management of connective tissue diseases is dramatically evolving with the advent of biologics and novel oral systemic therapeutics. Despite involvement in the care of these complex patients, there is a knowledge gap in the field of dermatology regarding these emerging agents. The second article in this continuing medical education series discusses new and emerging therapeutics for dermatomyositis and scleroderma that target cells, intracellular signaling pathways, and cytokines.

Characterization of the Clinical Evidence Supporting Repository Corticotropin Injection for FDA-Approved Indications: A Scoping Review

IMPORTANCE

Repository corticotropin injection is an expensive medication that was approved in 1952 for the treatment of many inflammatory conditions. The clinical evidence supporting the use of repository corticotropin (hereinafter referred to as corticotropin) has been weak, perhaps because its approval predated the modern review standards of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the clinical evidence supporting the use of corticotropin for its FDA-approved indications.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Studies were identified via electronic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from database inception to May 12, 2021 (the MEDLINE search was updated on June 8, 2021). Bibliographies of retrieved articles were also reviewed through ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA documents, and the manufacturer's website. Search terms included HP Acthar, ACTH gel, repository corticotropin, and terms for specific diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, nephrotic syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and West syndrome (or spasms, infantile). The review included randomized clinical trials (RCTs), nonrandomized and single-arm clinical trials, and prospective cohort studies that compared corticotropin with an active comparator, placebo, or no treatment. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and verified by a second. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Studies were qualitatively synthesized by indication to summarize important design features and results.

FINDINGS

Of 1059 records screened, 203 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 41 studies involving 2235 participants met inclusion criteria; of those, 11 involved infantile spasms, 10 involved multiple sclerosis (MS), 11 involved rheumatological conditions, 7 involved nephrotic syndrome, 1 involved ocular conditions, and 1 involved sarcoidosis. Overall, 19 studies either included a single arm or exclusively compared different corticotropin dosing strategies. The evidence was most robust for the treatment of infantile spasms and MS. The largest number of studies comparing corticotropin with an active agent (n = 4) or placebo (n = 5) pertained to MS, with almost all studies finding that corticotropin performed better than placebo but no different than corticosteroids. For the treatment of infantile spasms, 8 controlled studies were identified (6 were randomized); of those, only 1 small RCT found corticotropin to be significantly superior to corticosteroids. Studies of patients with other conditions (n = 20) frequently lacked a control group (n = 12), were placebo-controlled (n = 5), or exclusively examined different corticotropin dosing strategies (n = 2). Placebo-controlled RCTs of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, optic neuritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and nephrotic syndrome were generally small and did not consistently demonstrate that corticotropin was superior to placebo. Blinded RCTs showed a similar or greater number of adverse effects with corticotropin relative to corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this scoping review, few RCTs supported the clinical benefit of corticotropin for most FDA-approved indications. Most RCTs found that corticotropin was not superior to corticosteroids for treating relapses of MS or infantile spasms.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), also known as myositis, are a heterogeneous group of autoimmune disorders with varying clinical manifestations, treatment responses and prognoses. Muscle weakness is usually the classical clinical manifestation but other organs can be affected, including the skin, joints, lungs, heart and gastrointestinal tract, and they can even result in the predominant manifestations, supporting that IIM are systemic inflammatory disorders. Different myositis-specific auto-antibodies have been identified and, on the basis of clinical, histopathological and serological features, IIM can be classified into several subgroups - dermatomyositis (including amyopathic dermatomyositis), antisynthetase syndrome, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis, polymyositis and overlap myositis. The prognoses, treatment responses and organ manifestations vary among these groups, implicating different pathophysiological mechanisms in each subtype. A deeper understanding of the molecular pathways underlying the pathogenesis and identifying the auto-antigens of the immune reactions in these subgroups is crucial to improving outcomes. New, more homogeneous subgroups defined by auto-antibodies may help define disease mechanisms and will also be important in future clinical trials for the development of targeted therapies and in identifying biomarkers to guide treatment decisions for the individual patient.

Inflammatory myopathies: shedding light on promising agents and combination therapies in clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Due to new insights into the pathogenesis of inflammatory myopathies - in short myositis - and the urgent need for new treatment options in patients who are refractory to standard therapy, multiple novel drugs have been developed and studied in clinical trials. In light of this exciting development, a critical evaluation of the present data is necessary in order to identify the best pathway to future treatment of inflammatory myopathies.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the current evidence from clinical trials in myositis and encompasses dermatomyositis, polymyositis, necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase-syndrome, overlap myositis, and inclusion body myositis. The results of studies on new therapeutic agents are summarized, in particular larger cohort studies and randomized trials from recent years. When such data were not available, earlier and smaller representative studies were included instead.

EXPERT OPINION

Current studies in most myositis subtypes have shown positive effects of novel biologicals such as abatacept, sifalimumab, JAK-Inhibitors as well as known agents such as rituximab, but further studies are needed to confirm these observations. In inclusion body myositis, the eagerly awaited recent therapeutic trials have missed their primary endpoints, except for the phase 2 study with rapamycin, which has demonstrated significant improvements in secondary endpoints. Future trials will also need to focus on combination therapies of multiple immunomodulatory agents.

Perspectives on glucocorticoid usage in patients with adult inflammatory myopathy

This study aims to describe the patient perspective on glucocorticoid (GC) treatment and adverse effects (AEs) in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). An online survey was distributed to patients with adult-onset IIM using the Myositis UK page on Healthunlocked.com, an online social network for health. Respondents were asked to rate the severity of AEs they attributed to GCs on a Likert scale (0-5), and to report concerns and overall experience of GC treatment. The survey was completed by 122 respondents. The median reported current daily dose of prednisolone was 15 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 8, 25) and median treatment duration 5.3 years (IQR 3.4, 8.0) at the time of survey completion. Only 54% of respondents "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the information provided to them about GC treatment was adequate. AEs rated most severe by respondents were weight gain, moon face, sleep disturbances and increased hunger. The duration of GC treatment weakly correlated with the mean number of reported AEs (p = 0.004) and mean severity of AEs (p = 0.017). There was an inverse relationship between age and acne, stretch marks, hair loss, facial hair, nausea and heartburn (p < 0.05). In this first study of patient-reported experiences of GCs specifically in IIM, we describe the burden of treatment and highlight the unmet need for safe and well-tolerated treatments. We report that patients with IIM often remain on long-term GC treatment at moderate doses, and that AEs are common. The reported data will be useful in planning discussions with patients regarding adherence to their treatment options. Key Points • Glucocorticoids (GC) are the first-line treatment in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), and are associated with a wide range of adverse effects • The adverse effects related to GC are very common, and those reported most severe by patients included weight gain, moon face, increased hunger or sleep disturbance, which may differ from the primary concerns of their treating clinician • Understanding the patient perspective and concerns about treatment is necessary to maintain a good physician-patient relationship and may help with treatment adherence.

Expert Perspective: Management of Refractory Inflammatory Myopathy

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are chronic disorders characterized by inflammation in skeletal muscle but also in other organs such as the skin, lungs, joints, gastrointestinal tract, and heart. The effect of immunosuppressive treatment varies between individual patients and between organ manifestations within the same individual. Many patients respond poorly to first-line treatment with glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents such as methotrexate or azathioprine, with symptoms persisting in the muscles, skin, and lungs, leading to refractory disease. Management of refractory IIM is a clinical challenge, and a systematic approach is proposed to better understand the lack of treatment response, in order to guide disease management. The first step in the management of refractory IIM is to recognize whether remaining symptoms are caused by persistent inflammation in the affected tissue or whether the symptoms may be attributable to damage preceding inflammation. Thus, a second diagnostic examination is recommended. Second, in particular for patients with remaining muscle weakness, it is important to ascertain whether the diagnosis of myositis is correct or whether another underlying muscle disorder could explain the symptoms. Third, with confirmation of remaining inflammation in the tissues, a strategy to change treatment needs to be undertaken. Few controlled trials are available to guide our treatment strategies. Furthermore, different subgroups of patients may benefit from different therapies, and different organ manifestations may respond to different therapies. In this context, subgrouping of patients with IIM based on autoantibody profile may be helpful, as there are emerging data from open studies and case series to support the notion of a varying treatment response in different autoantibody-defined subgroups of IIM patients.

Treatment of Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies by Low-Dose Interleukin-2: A Prospective Cohort Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) is challenging due to a lack of safe and efficacious medication. Low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) treatment emerges as a new option in active IIMs. This study aims to explore the clinical and immunological effects of low-dose IL-2 in patients with active IIMs.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with active IIMs were enrolled and received 1 × 106 IU of IL-2 subcutaneously every other day for 12 weeks on top of standard care. The primary endpoint for the trial was change in percentage of regulatory T (Treg) cells in total CD4+ T cells at week 12. The secondary endpoints included the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) definition of improvement (DOI), the 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) myositis response criteria, safety, and steroid-sparing effect at weeks 12 and 24.

RESULTS

With low-dose IL-2 treatment, 77.78% (14/18) patients achieved IMACS DOI and 83.33% (15/18) patients met the 2016 ACR/EULAR myositis response criteria at week 12. All individual core set measures (CSMs) including PhGA, PGA and HAQ-DI, muscle enzymes, MMT-8 and extramuscular activity were improved at week 12. The cutaneous dermatomyositis disease area and severity index activity score (CDASI-a) decreased significantly from 7 (4.5, 13) to 2 (0, 7) after IL-2 administration (P < 0.001). Proportion of Treg cells significantly increased with low-dose IL-2 treatment at week 12 (8.97% [5.77, 9.89%] vs. 15.2% [10.4, 17.3%], P = 0.009). There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose IL-2 was effective in active IIMs and well tolerated. The amelioration of disease activity may associate with promotion of Tregs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04062019.

Outcomes of Repository Corticotropin Gel for Ocular Sarcoidosis

Purpose: To evaluate the utility and side effect profile of subcutaneous repository corticotropin gel (RCI) in ocular sarcoidosis.Methods: Retrospective chart review.Results: Among six identified patients on RCI therapy, 4 had uveitis, one had optic neuritis and one had uveitis and optic neuritis secondary to sarcoidosis. The average follow-up was 43.5 months. RCI therapy was continuous in 4 patients (average 7.7 months) and intermittent in 2 patients (24 and 12 months). Five of the 6 patients continued with local and/or systemic corticosteroids for ocular inflammation control while on RCI therapy.  Two-thirds of patients experienced adverse effects including hyperpigmentation, alopecia, and severe hypertension. RCI therapy was discontinued in 5 of the 6 patients due to continued inflammation and side/adverse effects (4 patients) and loss of follow-up (1 patient).Conclusion: In this small cohort, the majority of patients failed to achieve adequate steroid-sparing ocular inflammation control and experienced side effects while on RCI therapy. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the role of RCI in ocular inflammation.

Treatment of Noninfectious Retinal Vasculitis Using Subcutaneous Repository Corticotropin Injection

PURPOSE

To show whether subcutaneous repository corticotropin injection (RCI, Acthar® Gel, a repository corticotropin injection, can be an effective potential therapeutic agent for noninfectious retinal vasculitis.

METHODS

Patients with active retinal vasculitis were followed with serial ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiograms and treated with 80 units of subcutaneous repository corticotropin injection twice weekly.

RESULTS

Primary outcome of ≥ 50% improvement in response level (RL) for retinal vasculitis and percent improvement in retinal vasculitis severity scoring (RVSS) by more than one quartile ( ≥ 25%) at week 12 was met in 15 and 16 of the 30 total eyes, respectively, including 1 eye with severe retinal vasculitis in each group. Complete resolution of retinal vasculitis was seen in seven eyes with a mean time of 17.1 weeks. Intraocular pressure elevation requiring therapy and cataract progression were noted in two and three eyes, respectively. One patient stopped medication due to side effects (injection site reaction).

CONCLUSION

Repository corticotropin injection was well-tolerated overall. Repository corticotropin injection may be an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of noninfectious retinal vasculitis.

Follow-up results of myositis patients treated with H. P. Acthar gel

OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of autoimmune diseases characterized by proximal muscle weakness. H. P. Acthar gel [repository corticotropin injection (RCI)] is a formulation of adrenocorticotropic hormone and has been approved by Food and Drug Administration for use in IIM; however, literature is limited. In this study, we report longitudinal follow-up of myositis patients treated with RCI.

METHODS

Patients with refractory IIM who were enrolled in the prospective, open-label RCI trial were included in this study. The post-trial follow-up period was 6 months with assessments every 2 months, which included myositis core set measures including extra-muscular global, muscle and patient global disease activities, HAQ, and manual muscle testing.

RESULTS

Two patients were lost to follow-up after finalization of the trial, and the remaining eight patients were enrolled in the follow-up study. One patient remained on RCI after the trial. In the follow-up period, four of eight patients had flare at on average 4.1 months after the RCI trial. Among the patients who flared, three required an increase in prednisone. One patient was restarted on RCI at 5.5 months, but had minimal improvement after 3 months. Four patients who remained stable continued to satisfy criteria for the definition of improvement through the 6-month follow-up. However, none showed any further improvement in the primary or secondary efficacy outcomes after the initial RCI trial.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the follow-up results of patients treated with standard dose and duration of Acthar. We believe that our study will provide the basis for the development of future randomized RCI trials in IIM.

Clinical trials and novel therapeutics in dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Currently, there are no proven drugs that are FDA approved for the treatment of dermatomyositis (DM), even though multiple clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate safety and efficacy of novel therapeutics in DM. The purpose of this review is to highlight the biological plausibility, existing clinical evidence as well as completed and ongoing clinical trials for various drugs in pipeline for development for use in dermatomyositis.

AREAS COVERED

The drugs with the strongest evidence have been included in this review with a focus on the mechanism of their action pertaining to the disease process, clinical studies including completed and ongoing trials. With better understanding of the underlying pathophysiologic process, there are new molecular targets that have been identified that can be targeted by these novel drugs, predominantly biologic drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

There are various drugs being evaluated in phase II/III clinical trials that hold promise in DM. At the forefront of these are immunoglobulin, Lenabasum, and Abatacept for which phase III clinical trials are ongoing. In addition, promising clinical studies are ongoing or reported for KZR-616, anti-B cell therapy, anti-interferon drugs, and Repository Corticotrophin Injection (RCI).

Treatment with Repository Corticotropin Injection in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Dermatomyositis/Polymyositis

PURPOSE

Repository corticotropin injection (RCI) is indicated for a number of autoimmune-mediated diseases including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and dermatomyositis (DM)/polymyositis (PM). To better understand the practice patterns and outcomes of RCI in patients with RA, SLE, or DM/PM, we conducted a retrospective medical record analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Participating providers selected deidentified medical records of patients meeting the inclusion criteria (age ≥18 years; physician-reported diagnosis of RA, SLE, or DM/PM; initiation of treatment with RCI between 1/1/2011 and 2/15/2016; ≥3 in-office visits with same site/provider). Collected data spanned 12 months before and after the first prescription date for RCI. Analyses included patient demographics and clinical history, RCI treatment patterns, and physician's impression of change.

RESULTS

Data from 54 patients with RA, 30 patients with SLE, and 8 patients with DM/PM were analyzed. The most frequently reported reasons for initiating RCI were lack of efficacy with prior treatment, acute exacerbation of disease, and use as add-on to ongoing therapy. The most common initial RCI dosing, 80 U twice weekly, was used for 84% of patients with RA, 75% with SLE, and 86% with DM/PM. The mean duration of treatment was 4.8, 6.5, and 6.8 months for RA, SLE, and DM/PM, respectively. Among the 57 patients with data on physician's impression of change with RCI, 78.1% of patients with RA, 94.7% with SLE, and 66.7% with DM/PM had a rating of "improved," and the mean time to best impression of change was 3.4, 4.3, and 3.4 months for RA, SLE, and DM/PM, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the real-world patient profile, use patterns, and outcomes of patients who used RCI for the treatment of RA, SLE, and DM/PM. These data can inform appropriate use and clinical expectations when using RCI.

Inflammatory muscle disease - An update

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a heterogeneous group of inflammatory myopathies whose common feature is immune-mediated muscle injury. There are distinct subgroups including dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), inclusion body myositis, and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Antisynthetase syndrome is also emerging as a distinct subgroup with its unique muscle histopathological characteristic of perifascicular necrosis. While the newly updated EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for IIM have brought advancements in diagnosis and the exclusion of mimickers, the use of only one autoantibody in the derivation of the schema limits its use. Similarly, while the advent of multiple novel therapeutics in the treatment of myositis has been exciting, it has also highlighted the scarcity of validated outcome measures. The purpose of our review is to highlight the updated classification criteria of myositis, newly reported clinical phenotypes associated with myositis autoantibodies, the measurement of outcomes, and emerging treatments in the field.

New insights into the treatment of myositis

The myositis syndromes include polymyositis, dermatomyositis (DM), necrotizing myopathy, inclusion body myositis (IBM), antisynthetase syndrome and overlap syndromes with myositis. These syndromes mostly occur in middle-aged patients, while juvenile DM occurs in children and adolescents. Patients mostly show a subacute weakness and myalgia in the upper and lower limbs, the diagnosis is based upon these clinical findings in combination with muscle biopsy results and specific serum autoantibodies. In recent years, research achieved a better understanding about the molecular mechanism underlying the myositis syndromes, as well as disease progress and extramuscular organ manifestations, such as interstitial lung disease and association with neoplasias. Treatment mainly consists of glucocorticosteroids and immunosuppressants. IBM is usually refractory to treatments. This review provides an overview of the current standards of treatment and new treatment options like monoclonal antibodies and new molecular therapies and their first results from clinical trials.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adult Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) have considerable impact on patient symptoms and quality of life. We have reviewed the evolution of patient-centered care and use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for adults with IIM.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of PROMs in myositis care and research is limited, although the importance of incorporation into routine practice and trials has become increasingly recognized. Several key domains/measures have been identified including the patient global assessment of disease activity, physical function as measured by the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), or the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System ® (PROMIS®) in adult IIM. Data are limited for these instruments concerning their reliability, content and construct validity, and responsiveness. Incorporation of the patient perspective into clinical care and research may be used to address the unmet/unaddressed needs of the patient living with myositis. Several ongoing projects aim to bring validated PROMs to the IIM community.

Recent Advances in Pharmacological Treatments of Adult Dermatomyositis

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an uncommon autoimmune disease that primarily affects the skin, muscle, and/or lungs, and remains a therapeutic challenge. We discuss recent studies evaluating efficacy of conventional treatments for clinically amyopathic DM (CADM), DM-associated interstitial lung (ILD) disease, and classic DM (CDM). We highlight several emerging new therapies with a focus on clinical trials, systematic reviews, and case series in the last 5 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies report a significant number of patients remain refractory to antimalarials and require second- and third-line agents. Effective treatment for DM-associated ILD can vary based on patient specific antibodies. CDM requires oral glucocorticoids; recent studies have evaluated the benefits of adjunctive therapies including methotrexate and calcineurin inhibitors. New therapies target cell populations or cytokines thought to drive disease pathogenesis. Dermatomyositis is an autoimmune disease that remains challenging to treat. Many patients are refractory to conventional therapies, warranting the development and evaluation of new treatments.

Biologics in refractory myositis: experience in juvenile vs. adult myositis; part II: emerging biologic and other therapies on the horizon

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) until recently have been considered a heterogeneous broad group of six autoimmune muscle diseases. Initially, autoantibodies in IIM (including JDM) and CD8+ T cell-induced cytotoxicity (PM and IBM) were the predominant recognized etiopathology mechanisms used to classify myopathies. In the early late 1990's to 2000's, evolving understanding of the molecules such as interleukin (IL), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interferon (IFN), and other cytokines as well as differences in response to therapies, has led IIM researchers to look beyond previous disease mechanisms. For decades the overexpression of Th1- associated cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-12) in the areas of inflammation in skin and muscle in IIM pointed to Th1 as the primary pathway for inflammation in myositis.However, in the last decade overexpression and elevated level of Th17-associated cytokines (IL-17, IL-22, and IL-6) were identified in the blood and the inflamed muscles of myositis patients. We also do not know how Th1 and Th2 cytokines work differently in diverse hosts, in different concentrations, in different inflammatory milieus, and in the presence or absence of each other or other adhesion/co-stimulatory molecules such as NF-κB. Also, several autoantibodies to intracellular organelles have been identified in myositis.In this review, we will discuss the most recent advances in IIM research and how that might bring new biologic therapies to market in the next 5-15 years to assist in the care of our most difficult IIM and JDM patients.

Current Treatment for Myositis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to give an update on treatment modalities for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, or shortly myositis, excluding the subgroup inclusion body myositis, based on a literature survey on therapies used in myositis. Few controlled trials have been performed in patients with myositis; therefore, we also included a summary of open-label trials, case series, and case reports.

RECENT FINDINGS

Glucocorticoid (GC) in high doses is still the first-line treatment of patients with myositis. There is a general recommendation to combine GCs with another immunosuppressive agent in the early phase of disease to better control disease activity and possibly to reduce the risk for GC-related side effects. Furthermore, combining pharmacological treatment with individualized and supervised exercise can be recommended based on evidence. There is some evidence for the effect of rituximab in patients with certain myositis-specific autoantibodies, whereas other biologic agents are currently being tested in clinical trials.

SUMMARY

Immunosuppressive treatment in combination with exercise is recommended for patients with myositis to reduce disease activity and improve muscle performance. Subgrouping of patients into clinical and serological subtypes may be a way to identify biomarkers for response to specific immunosuppressive and biological agents and should be considered in future trials.

Industry Payments to Physician Specialists Who Prescribe Repository Corticotropin

Importance

Despite great expense and little evidence supporting use over corticosteroids, prescriptions for repository corticotropin (H. P. Acthar Gel; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals) have increased markedly. Aggressive sales tactics and payments from the manufacturer may influence prescribing behavior for this expensive medication.

Objective

To characterize industry payments to physician specialists who prescribe corticotropin in the Medicare program.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a cross-sectional analysis of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2015 Part D prescribing data linked to 2015 Open Payments data. Nephrologists, neurologists, and rheumatologists with more than 10 corticotropin prescriptions (frequent prescribers) in 2015 were included.

Exposures

Frequency, category, and magnitude of corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt recorded in the Open Payments database.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Frequency, category, and magnitude of corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt, as well as corticotropin prescriptions and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries.

Results

Of the 235 included physicians, 65 were nephrologists; 59, neurologists; and 111, rheumatologists. A majority of frequent corticotropin prescribers (207 [88%]) received corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt. The median (range) total payment for 2015 was $189 ($11-$138 321), with the highest payments ranging from $56 549 to $138 321 across the specialties. More than 20% of frequent prescribers received more than $10 000 and the top quartile of recipients received a median (range) of $33 190 ($9934-$138 321) in total payments per prescriber. Payments for compensation for services other than consulting contributed the most to the total amount. Mallinckrodt payments were positively associated with greater Medicare spending on corticotropin (β = 1.079; 95% CI, 1.044-1.115; P < .001), with every $10 000 in payments associated with a 7.9% increase (approximately $53 000) in Medicare spending on corticotropin. There was no association between corticotropin-related payments and spending on prescriptions for synthetic corticosteroids.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, most nephrologists, neurologists, and rheumatologists who frequently prescribe corticotropin received corticotropin-related payments from Mallinckrodt. These findings suggest that financial conflicts of interest may be driving use of corticotropin in the Medicare program.

Current diagnosis and treatment of polymyositis and dermatomyositis

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are heterogeneous disorders that affect the skeletal muscles. Polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis are major IIM subsets. Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy became recognized as a potentially new IIM subset. Since the new classification criteria published by the International Myositis Classification Criteria Project have higher sensitivity and specificity for IIM classification and subclassification than the previous criteria, they should help precise diagnosis. It should be noted that several tests available in current clinical practice, such as electromyography, magnetic resonance imaging, and other myositis-specific autoantibodies than anti-Jo-1 antibodies, were not included in the new criteria. As for treatment, glucocorticoids are used empirically as the first-line treatment despite their various adverse effects. Concomitant treatment with steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents, including methotrexate, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide, reduces successfully initial glucocorticoid doses for the remission induction, the relapse risk during glucocorticoid tapering, and adverse effects of glucocorticoids. Treatment with biologics, including rituximab and abatacept, seems promising in some IIM patients. Multi-target treatment with glucocorticoids and several steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents is effective in refractory IIM patients. Considering proven steroid-sparing efficacy and tolerability of multi-target treatment in patients with other autoimmune diseases, it should be a good therapeutic option for IIMs.