Consensus-based recommendations for the management of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SHARE initiative

To switch or to swap? Evidence from a meta-analysis for the best treatment approach in childhood chronic uveitis resistant to the I anti-TNF

Objective

Since adalimumab approval in childhood chronic non-infectious uveitis (cNIU), the prognosis has been dramatically changed, but the 25 % failed to achieve inactivity. There is not accordance if it is better to switch to another anti-TNF or to swap to another category of biologic. Thus, we aim to summarize evidence regarding the best treatment of cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF.

Methods

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis, according to PRISMA Guidelines, was performed(Jan2000-Aug2023). Studies investigating the efficacy of treatment in cNIU refractory to the first anti-TNF were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was the improvement of intraocular inflammation according to SUN. A combined estimation of the proportion of children responding to switch or swap and for each drug was performed.

Results

23 articles were eligible, reporting 150 children of whom 109 switched anti-TNF (45 adalimumab, 49 infliximab, 9 golimumab) and 41 swapped to another biologics (31 abatacept, 8 tocilizumab and 1 rituximab). The proportion of responding children was 46 %(95 % CI 23-70) for switch and 38 %(95 % CI 8-73) for swap (χ20.02, p = 0.86). Instead analysing for each drug, the proportion of responding children was the 24 %(95 % CI 2-55) for adalimumab, 43 %(95 % CI 2-80) for abatacept, 79 %(95 % CI 61-93) for infliximab, 56 %(95 % CI 14-95) for golimumab and 96 %(95 % CI 58-100) for tocilizumab. We evaluated a superiority of tocilizumab and infliximab compared to the other drugs(χ2 27.5 p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Although non-conclusive, this meta-analysis suggests that, after the first anti-TNF failure, tocilizumab and infliximab are the best available treatment for the management of cNIU.

Clinical characteristics of pediatric noninfectious uveitis and risk factors for severe disease: a single-center study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to present the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data of children with non-infectious uveitis and to evaluate the risk factors for the development of complications and the need for biological treatment.

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with non-infectious uveitis in childhood and followed up for at least 1 year were included in the study. Demographic data, including age, gender, age at diagnosis, uveitis in first-degree relatives, and rheumatologic diseases, were obtained retrospectively from medical records. The presence of complications or the need for biologic therapy was considered a composite outcome suggesting severe disease.

RESULTS

The study included 123 patients (female: n = 59, 48%). The mean age at diagnosis was 14.89 ± 4.86 years. Uveitis was symptomatic in 104 patients (84.6%). Approximately one-quarter of the patients had at least one rheumatic disease (n = 35, 28.5%), the most common being juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Thirty-three patients (26.8%) had anti-nuclear antibody positivity. Biologic agents were needed in 60 patients (48.8%). Complications developed in 14 patients (11.4%). Early age at disease onset (aOR, 0.875; 95% C.I. 0.795-0.965, p = 0.007) and female gender (aOR, 2.99; 95% C.I. 1.439-6.248, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with the need for biologic treatment, while Behçet's disease (BD) was strongly associated with uveitis-related complications (aOR, 14.133; 95% C.I. 2.765-72.231, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that among pediatric patients with non-infectious uveitis, females, those with an early age of disease onset, and those with BD need to be closely monitored due to a significantly increased risk of severe disease. Key Points • Limited data exist on the clinical course of non-infectious uveitis in children and the associated risk factors for severe disease. • Our study reveals that nearly a quarter of pediatric patients with non-infectious uveitis also have a rheumatic disease. • Among pediatric patients diagnosed with non-infectious uveitis, we observed an increased risk of severe disease in those with an earlier onset age, in female patients, and in those diagnosed with Behçet's disease.

Genetic association of antinuclear antibodies with HLA in JIA patients: a Swedish cohort study

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a complex autoimmune disease and the most common chronic rheumatological disease affecting children under the age of 16. The etiology of JIA remains poorly understood, but evidence suggests a significant genetic predisposition.

METHODS

We analyzed a Swedish cohort of 329 JIA patients and 728 healthy adult controls using the Illumina OmniExpress array for genotyping. HLA alleles were imputed from GWAS data using the SNP2HLA algorithm.

RESULTS

Case-control analysis yielded 12 SNPs with genome-wide significant association to JIA, all located on chromosome 6 within the MHC class II gene region. Notably, the top SNP (rs28421666) was located adjacent to HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DRB1. HLA-DRB1*08:01, HLA-DQA1*04:01, and HLA-DQB1*04:02 were the haplotypes most strongly associated with an increased risk of JIA in the overall cohort. When analyzing disease specific subtypes, these alleles were associated with oligoarthritis and RF-negative polyarthritis. Within the complex linkage disequilibrium of the HLA-DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 haplotype, our analysis suggests that HLA-DRB1*08 might be the primary allele linked to JIA susceptibility. The HLA-DRB1*11 allele group was also independently associated with JIA and specifically enriched in the oligoarthritis patient group. Additionally, our study revealed a significant correlation between antinuclear antibody (ANA) positivity and specific HLA alleles. The ANA-positive JIA group showed stronger associations with the HLA-DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 haplotype, HLA-DRB1*11, and HLA-DPB1*02, suggesting a potential connection between genetic factors and ANA production in JIA. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis reaffirmed the effects of HLA alleles, female sex, and lower age at onset on ANA positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified distinct genetic associations between HLA alleles and JIA subtypes, particularly in ANA-positive patients. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the genetic basis of JIA and provide insights into the genetic control of autoantibody production in ANA-positive JIA patients. This may inform future classification and personalized treatment approaches for JIA, ultimately improving patient outcomes and management of this disease.

Update on non-infectious uveitis treatment: anti-TNF-alpha and beyond

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) encompasses a range of conditions marked by inflammation within various layers of the eye. NIU is a significant contributor to irreversible vision loss among the working-age population in developed countries. The aim of treating uveitis is to manage inflammation, prevent its recurrences and to restore or salvage vision. Presently, the standard treatment protocol for NIU involves initiating corticosteroids as the primary therapeutic agents, although more aggressive approaches and steroid sparing agent may be necessary in certain cases. These advanced treatments option include synthetic immunosuppressants like antimetabolites, calcineurin inhibitors and alkylating agents. For patients who exhibit an intolerance or resistance to corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressive therapies, biologic agents have emerged as a promising alternative. Notably, among the biologic treatments evaluated, TNF-α inhibitors, anti-CD20 therapy and alkylating agents have shown considerable efficacy. In this review, we delve into the latest evidence surrounding the effectiveness of biologic therapy and introduce novel therapeutic strategies targeting immune components as potential avenues for advancing treatment of NIU.

Surgical Glaucoma Treatment in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: Results after Trabeculectomy or Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation

PURPOSE

Patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated uveitis (JIAU) are at risk for secondary glaucoma, frequently requiring surgical management. We compared the success rates for trabeculectomy (TE) and Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of TE (45 eyes), primary AGV (pAGV) (7 eyes), or secondary AGV (sAGV) implantation after TE (11 eyes) in JIAU at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

All groups achieved significant pressure reduction. After 1 year, the overall success rate was higher in the Ahmed groups (p = 0.03). After adjusting the p-value according to Benjamin Hochberg, there is no significant difference between the groups in the Kaplan-Meier, despite a significant logrank test between all groups (p = 0.0194) and a better performance in the Ahmed groups.

CONCLUSION

Slightly better success rates were achieved with pAGV in managing JIAU patients with glaucoma refractory to medical treatment.

Uveitis in the Pediatric Population and Therapeutic Management: A Current Literature Review

Uveitis is an inflammatory disease that can lead to severe complications, including vision loss. The pediatric population is particularly at risk of developing complications, as uveitis in this age group often has idiopathic origins or is associated with systemic diseases that follow a severe course. This, coupled with unfavorable treatment outcomes, continues to be a challenge in pediatric ophthalmology. The cornerstone of uveitis treatment involves a therapeutic strategy that depends on the etiology, severity, and localization of the inflammation, as well as the patient's response to treatment and the presence of ocular complications. Patients who do not receive timely treatment face a significantly increased risk of experiencing a severe disease course. Understanding potential therapeutic options and their side effects is crucial in managing children with uveitis. Equally important is the continuous monitoring of the child's condition throughout the treatment process, due to the chronic and recurrent nature of uveitis in this demographic. The authors conducted a review of the current literature from 2018 to 2023 on the management and introduction of new therapeutic approaches for children with uveitis.

Clinical Efficacy of Biosimilar Switch of Adalimumab for Management of Uveitis

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab has demonstrated efficacy in non-infectious uveitis. With the introduction of biosimilar agents such as Amgevita, we aimed to quantify efficacy and tolerability compared to Humira in a multi-centre UK cohort.

METHODS

Patients identified from tertiary uveitis clinics in 3 centres, after institution-mandated switching was implemented.

RESULTS

Data collected for 102 patients, aged 2-75 years, with 185 active eyes. Following switch, rates of uveitis flare were not significantly different (13 events before, 21 after, p = .132). Rates of elevated intraocular pressure were decreased (32 before, 25 afterwards, p = .006) and dosing of oral and intra-ocular steroids was stable. Twenty-four patients (24%) requested to return to Humira, commonly due to pain from injection or technical difficulty with the device.

CONCLUSION

Amgevita is safe and effective for inflammatory uveitis with non-inferiority to Humira. Significant numbers of patients requested to switch back due to side effects including injection site reactions.

A practical approach to uveitis screening in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis typically presents as a silent chronic anterior uveitis and can lead to blindness. Adherence to current screening guidelines is hampered by complex protocols which rely on the knowledge of specific JIA characteristics. The Multinational Interdisciplinary Working Group for Uveitis in Childhood identified the need to simplify screening to enable local eye care professionals (ECPs), who carry the main burden, to screen children with JIA appropriately and with confidence.

METHODS

A consensus meeting took place in January 2023 in Barcelona, Spain, with an expert panel of 10 paediatric rheumatologists and 5 ophthalmologists with expertise in paediatric uveitis. A summary of the current evidence for JIA screening was presented. A nominal group technique was used to reach consensus.

RESULTS

The need for a practical but safe approach that allows early uveitis detection was identified by the panel. Three screening recommendations were proposed and approved by the voting members. They represent a standardised approach to JIA screening taking into account the patient's age at the onset of JIA to determine the screening interval until adulthood.

CONCLUSION

By removing the need for the knowledge of JIA categories, antinuclear antibody positivity or treatment status, the recommendations can be more easily implemented by local ECP, where limited information is available. It would improve the standard of care on the local level significantly. The proposed protocol is less tailored to the individual than the 'gold standard' ones it references and does not aim to substitute those where they are being used with confidence.

Infliximab in chronic non-infectious paediatric uveitis refractory to previous biologic therapy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the outcome of infliximab treatment in patients with non-infectious paediatric uveitis who have previously failed biologic treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed at Bristol Eye Hospital, UK. Paediatric patients with chronic non-infectious uveitis who had been switched to infliximab due to inadequate uveitis control were identified. Two separate groups were evaluated: group 1 consisted of 20 children (36 eyes) who had been switched to infliximab following treatment failure with adalimumab (=in-class switching), while group 2 (5 patients; 9 eyes) included those who had been switched to infliximab from a non-TNF antagonist after failing several biologics (=across-class switching). The change in anterior chamber (AC) activity between baseline and 6- and 24-months follow-up was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

A statistically significant reduction in AC activity was found between baseline and 6-months follow-up (RE: p = 0.002; LE: p < 0.001) and between baseline and 24-months follow-up (RE: p = 0.016; LE: p = 0.011) in group 1. No statistically significant difference was found for either eye in the number of steroid eye drops needed between time points or the difference in visual acuity in time. In group 2, analysis of change of AC activity, number of steroid eye drops and visual acuity failed to reach statistical significance. Treatment failure occurred in four patients (20% of group 1) and adverse events developed in six patients including three patients with acute infusion reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the efficacy and safety of infliximab in adalimumab-refractory patients with paediatric non-infectious uveitis.

Effectiveness and Safety of Biosimilars in Pediatric Non-infectious Uveitis: Real-Life Data from the International AIDA Network Uveitis Registry

INTRODUCTION

Since many biological drug patents have expired, biosimilar agents (BIOs) have been developed; however, there are still some reservations in their use, especially in childhood. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors BIOs as treatment for pediatric non-infectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

Data from pediatric patients with NIU treated with TNF inhibitors BIOs were drawn from the international AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) registries dedicated to uveitis and Behçet's disease. The effectiveness and safety of BIOs were assessed in terms of frequency of relapses, risk for developing ocular flares, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glucocorticoids (GCs)-sparing effect, drug survival, frequency of ocular complications, and adverse drug event (AE).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (77 affected eyes) were enrolled. The BIOs employed were adalimumab (ADA) (89.4%), etanercept (ETA) (5.3%), and infliximab (IFX) (5.3%). The number of relapses 12 months prior to BIOs and at last follow-up was 282.14 and 52.43 per 100 patients/year. The relative risk of developing ocular flares before BIOs introduction compared to the period following the start of BIOs was 4.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.38-5.98, p = 0.004). The number needed to treat (NNT) for ocular flares was 3.53. Median BCVA was maintained during the whole BIOs treatment (p = 0.92). A significant GCs-sparing effect was observed throughout the treatment period (p = 0.002). The estimated drug retention rate (DRR) at 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up were 92.7, 83.3, and 70.8%, respectively. The risk rate for developing structural ocular complications was 89.9/100 patients/year before starting BIOs and 12.7/100 patients/year during BIOs treatment, with a risk ratio of new ocular complications without BIOs of 7.1 (CI 3.4-14.9, p = 0.0003). Three minor AEs were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF inhibitors BIOs are effective in reducing the number of ocular uveitis relapses, preserving visual acuity, allowing a significant GCs-sparing effect, and preventing structural ocular complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05200715.

Monitoring compliance to topical therapy in children and young people with uveitis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Uveitis in children and young people (CYP) is a rare but potentially debilitating condition. Steroid eye drops are the first step in treatment and poor compliance may result in vision-threatening complications. This study aims to measure compliance with prescribed eye drops prospectively in a child-specific manner.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Patients aged 0-18 years attending a tertiary paediatric uveitis clinic using steroid drops were recruited. Both the CYP, and person with parental responsibility (PPR) completed questionnaires about compliance. A subgroup had bottles of Prednisolone 1% drops dispensed and weighed at the first appointment and reweighed at follow-up. The weight reduction was compared with expected weight change over the interval.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 42 patients of the 50 patients recruited. Thirty-one CYP and their respective PPR completed both questionnaires, 11 completed only one questionnaire (9 CYP, 2 PPR). Drop errors for all eye drops were reported more than "once a week" by 13/39 CYP (33.3%, 95% CI: 19.1%-50.2% of respondents), and 3/31 PPR (9.7%, CI: 19.1%-50.2% of respondents). Many PPR could not recall prescribed drop frequency (n = 13/31, 40.6%, CI: 23.7%-59.4% of respondents). Twelve patients had bottles weighed and returned. Insufficient weight reduction was found in 9 (75%, CI: 42.8%-94.5%). Within the eye drop weighing subgroup three participants (25%, CI: 5.5%-57.2%) used <50% the expected weight of drops.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated poor eye drop compliance in CYP with uveitis. Self-reported compliance was unreliable in this population. Worryingly, some patients miss more than 50% of drops and may suffer sub-optimal disease control.

Etanercept-associated episcleritis: a pediatric case report of a paradoxical adverse reaction and review of the literature

Scleritis is an inflammation of the episcleral and scleral tissues, characterized by injection in both superficial and deep episcleral vessels. When only episcleral tissue is involved, it is referred to as episcleritis. Episcleritis is mainly idiopathic but may be secondary to an underlying rheumatologic disease. Despite being rare, drug-associated episcleritis and scleritis should also be included in the differential diagnosis. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are generally well-tolerated, but etanercept, in particular, has the potential to cause paradoxical adverse reactions including ocular inflammations, such as uveitis, scleritis, and ocular myositis. Etanercept differs in its mechanism of action from other TNF-α inhibitors as it acts as a decoy receptor, and this may partly explain the more frequently reported etanercept-associated ocular inflammation. Etanercept may also be ineffective in preventing ocular inflammation. However, the dechallenge and rechallenge phenomena have proven there is a causative link between etanercept and new-onset ocular inflammation. We report a case of a 15-year-old boy with enthesitis-related arthritis and familial Mediterranean fever who presented with episcleritis and blepharitis while receiving etanercept treatment and subsequently showed dechallenge and rechallenge reactions. Therefore, physicians should also be aware that episcleritis should be considered a paradoxical adverse reaction to etanercept and can occur in pediatric patients. We also reviewed the English literature to provide an overview and evaluate intervention options.

Prospective study to characterize adalimumab exposure in pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases

BACKGROUND

In pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD), adalimumab is dosed using fixed weight-based bands irrespective of methotrexate co-treatment, disease activity (DA) or other factors that might influence adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) adalimumab exposure between 2-8 mg/L is associated with clinical response. PRD data on adalimumab is scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze adalimumab PK and its variability in PRD treated with/without methotrexate.

METHODS

A two-center prospective study in PRD patients aged 2-18 years treated with adalimumab and methotrexate (GA-M) or adalimumab alone (GA) for ≥ 12 weeks was performed. Adalimumab concentrations were collected 1-9 (maximum concentration; Cmax), and 10-14 days (minimum concentration; Cmin) during ≥ 12 weeks following adalimumab start. Concentrations were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (lower limit of quantification: 0.5 mg/L). Log-normalized Cmin were compared between GA-M and GA using a standard t-test.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (14 per group), diagnosed with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (71.4%), non-infectious uveitis (25%) or chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (3.6%) completed the study. GA-M included more females (71.4%; GA 35.7%, p = 0.13). At first study visit, children in GA-M had a slightly longer exposure to adalimumab (17.8 months [IQR 9.6, 21.6]) compared to GA (15.8 months [IQR 8.5, 30.8], p = 0.8). Adalimumab dosing was similar between both groups (median dose 40 mg every 14 days) and observed DA was low. Children in GA-M had a 27% higher median overall exposure compared to GA, although median Cmin adalimumab values were statistically not different (p = 0.3). Cmin values ≥ 8 mg/L (upper limit RA) were more frequently observed in GA-M versus GA (79% versus 64%). Overall, a wide range of Cmin values was observed in PRD (0.5 to 26 mg/L).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a high heterogeneity in adalimumab exposure in PRD. Adalimumab exposure tended to be higher with methotrexate co-treatment compared to adalimumab monotherapy although differences were not statistically significant. Most children showed adalimumab exposure exceeding those reported for RA with clinical response, particularly with methotrexate co-treatment. This highlights the need of further investigations to establish model-based personalized treatment strategies in PRD to avoid under- and overexposure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04042792 , registered 02.08.2019.

Diagnosis and Management of Non-Infectious Uveitis in Pediatric Patients

Uveitis in children accounts for 5-10% of all cases. The causes vary considerably. Classically, uveitis is distinguished according to its infectious or inflammatory origin and whether it is part of a systemic disease or represents an isolated ocular disease. It is important to highlight the specificity of certain etiologies among children such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The development of visual function can potentially be hindered by amblyopia (children aged < 7 years), in addition to the usual complications (synechiae, macular edema) seen in adult patients. Moreover, the presentation of uveitis in children is often "silent" with few warning signs and few functional complaints from young children, which frequently leads to a substantial diagnostic delay. The diagnostic approach is guided by the presentation of the uveitis, which can be characterized by its location, and corresponds to the initial and main site of intraocular inflammation; its presentation, whether acute or chronic, granulomatous or not; and the response to treatment. Pediatricians have an important role to play and must be aware of the various presentations and etiologies of uveitis in children. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common etiology of pediatric non-infectious uveitis, but other causes must be recognized. Promptly initiated treatment before complications arise requires early diagnosis, recognition, and treatment. Any dependence on prolonged local corticosteroid therapy justifies discussing the introduction of a corticosteroid-sparing treatment considering the risk to develop corticoid-induced glaucoma and cataracts. Systemic corticosteroid therapy can be required for urgent control of inflammation in the case of severe uveitis. Long-lasting immunosuppressive treatment and biotherapies are most often prescribed at the same time to reinforce treatment efficacy and to prevent relapse and corticosteroid dependency. We review the different causes of uveitis, excluding infection, and the diagnostic and therapeutic management aimed at limiting the risk of irreversible sequelae.

Defining a therapeutic range for adalimumab serum concentrations in the management of pediatric noninfectious uveitis, a step towards personalized treatment

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab is currently considered the most efficacious anti-TNFα agent for childhood noninfectious uveitis (NIU). The objective of this study was to define a therapeutic range for adalimumab trough levels in the treatment of childhood NIU.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, pilot study of 36 children with NIU aged < 18 years, treated with adalimumab. Serum adalimumab through levels and adalimumab anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were analysed at least 24 weeks after start adalimumab.

RESULTS

Adalimumab trough levels were significantly higher in complete responders 11.8 μg/mL (range 6.9-33.0) compared to partial or non-responders 9,2 μg/mL (range 0-13.6) (p = 0,004). Receiver-operator characteristics analyses with an area under the curve of 0,749 (95% CI, 0,561-0,937) defined 9.6 µg/mL as the lower margin for the therapeutic range. This cut-off corresponds with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 56% (positive predictive value, 85%; negative predictive value, 62.5%). A concentration effect curve defined 13 µg/mL as the upper margin. Approximately one-third (30.5%) of patients had an adalimumab trough concentration exceeding 13 µg/mL. Free ADA were observed in 2 patients (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A therapeutic range of adalimumab trough levels of 9.6 to 13 µg/mL, which corresponds with an optimal clinical effect, was identified. Therapeutic drug monitoring may guide the optimisation of treatment efficacy in children with NIU in the treat-to-target era.

Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: A Multi-Institutional Study in Taiwan

PURPOSE

To assess the epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis (JIA-U) in Taiwan.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter database.

RESULTS

Totally, 44 (6.1%) of the 722 JIA patients had uveitis. The mean ages of JIA and JIA-U diagnosis were 10.7 and 11.1 years, respectively. JIA-U patients had more antinuclear antibody presence. Among JIA-U patients, 25 (56.8%) were male, 11 (25.0%) experienced any ocular complication, and 8 (18.2%) received ocular surgery. Inactivity lasting ≥6 months was achieved in 17 (38.6%) patients; however, 11 (25.0%) of those experienced reactivation with a mean of 624.7 days after achieving inactivity. Female had more ocular complications and surgeries.

CONCLUSION

Late age at JIA-U diagnosis and male predominance were distinctive in Taiwan. For patients with inactivity lasting ≥ 6 months was achieved, they still required close follow-up due to the high reactivation rate within 2 years. Female had poorer ocular outcomes.

Effectiveness and Safety of Weekly Adalimumab for Non-Infectious Chronic Anterior Uveitis in Children

PURPOSE

Non-infectious chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) remains a therapeutic challenge. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of weekly dosing of adalimumab in children with non-infectious refractory CAU. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of children followed by non-infectious CAU treated with adalimumab were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 42 children with CAU, 27/42 (64.3%) were treated with adalimumab. Escalation to weekly dosing of adalimumab was necessary for 11/27 children (40.7%). After 3 and 6 months, 7/11 children (63.6%) met the composite endpoint of inflammation control improvement. Children requiring weekly adalimumab had initially more severe uveitis: anterior chamber cells (p = 0.02), aqueous flare (p = 0.02), and presence of macular edema (p = 0.007). No children had serious systemic side effects.

CONCLUSION

Weekly adalimumab in children with refractory CAU appears to be an effective and safe treatment for inflammation control and corticosteroid sparing, and an alternative before biologic switching. Controlled studies are needed.

Sarcoid Uveitis in Children

Sarcoidosis is a multi-system granulomatous disease that often presents with uveitis. Although sarcoidosis and sarcoid uveitis typically occur in adulthood, children also may be affected. There are two distinct clinical presentations of the pediatric disease, associated with younger and older age groups, and having different causations. "Early-onset sarcoidosis", beginning at age 5 years or less, is an autosomal dominant genetic disease, caused by a mutation in the NOD2 gene. It is also known as sporadic Blau syndrome or Jabs syndrome. "Adult-type sarcoidosis", usually beginning between the ages of 8 and 15 years, is believed to represent an excessive response to an environmental antigen. There is limited literature on the management of pediatric sarcoidosis, and treatment follows an approach applied to other forms of pediatric non-infectious uveitis. When systemic immunomodulatory therapy is indicated, methotrexate and/or adalimumab are often employed. The condition may persist into adulthood, and thus long-term follow-up is indicated.

UNICORNS: Uveitis in childhood prospective national cohort study protocol

Background: Childhood uveitis is a rare inflammatory eye disease which is typically chronic, relapsing-remitting in nature, with an uncertain aetiology (idiopathic). Visual loss occurs due to structural damage caused by uncontrolled inflammation. Understanding of the determinants of long term outcome is lacking, including the predictors of therapeutic response or how to define disease control. Aims: To describe disease natural history and outcomes amongst a nationally representative group of children with non-infectious uveitis, describe the impact of disease course on quality of life for both child and family, and identify determinants of adverse visual, structural and developmental outcomes. Methods: UNICORNS is a prospective longitudinal multicentre cohort study of children newly diagnosed with uveitis about whom a core minimum clinical dataset will be collected systematically. Participants and their families will also complete patient-reported outcome measures annually from recruitment. The association of patient (child- and treatment- dependent) characteristics with outcome will be investigated using logistic and ordinal regression models which incorporate adjustment for within-child correspondence between eyes for those with bilateral disease and repeated outcomes measurement. Discussion: Through this population based, prospective longitudinal study of childhood uveitis, we will describe the characteristics of childhood onset disease. Early (1-2 years following diagnosis) outcomes will be described in the first instance, and through the creation of a national inception cohort, longer term studies will be enabled of outcome for affected children and families.

An Overview of Pediatric Uveitis

Uveitis in childhood poses a distinct challenge, mainly because of the insidious onset and chronic course of intraocular inflammation in most cases, which may result in permanent visual loss due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Although anterior uveitis, frequently associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, is the most common form of ocular involvement, idiopathic intermediate uveitis (pars planitis) is also a common uveitic entity in childhood. Posterior or panuveitis of a variety of noninfectious or infectious etiologies may be seen as well. Pediatric uveitis needs to be closely monitored since serious ocular complications such as intraocular pressure elevation, cataract, and macular edema may rapidly develop due to inadequately controlled inflammation and/or the use of corticosteroids. Methotrexate is generally the first- line corticosteroid-sparing agent, and adalimumab is the first-line biologic in refractory cases of noninfectious uveitis. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to monitor systemic disease associations, treatment response, and adverse events in children with uveitis.

Encouraging visual outcomes in children with idiopathic and JIA associated uveitis: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Pediatric uveitis is typically asymptomatic and may become chronic affecting ocular structures and vision. We evaluated visual outcomes, clinical features, medication, and uveitis activity in children with either idiopathic uveitis (idio-U) or juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis (JIA-U).

METHODS

A longitudinal, population-based cohort study of children with uveitis in 2008-2017. The data included parameters for age, gender, age at diagnosis, laterality, chronicity, anatomical distribution, etiology, systemic association, uveitis activity, medication, and visual outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients aged < 16 years with uveitis were included. Uveitis was idio-U in 23% and associated with JIA in 77% of cases. 37% of the patients in the idio-U group and 65% in the JIA-U were girls (p = 0.014). The mean age at first uveitis was 10.0 (SD 3.4) years in idio-U and 5.5 (SD 3.3) years in JIA-U (p < 0.001). Anterior location of uveitis was noted in 74% in idio-U and 99% in JIA-U (p < 0.001). Mostly, uveitis was chronic (59% in idio-U and 75% in JIA-U) and bilateral (56% in idio-U and 64% in JIA-U). Topical corticosteroids were initially used by 89% and 100%, systemic corticosteroids by 30% and 27% in some extent during the follow-up, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) by 33% and 85% (p < 0.001) of the patients in idio-U and JIA-U, respectively. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were more common in JIA-U (55% vs. 15% in idio-U, respectively, p < 0.001). Most patients had normal visual acuity (Snellen > 0.8, [6/7.5]) in the affected eye and bilaterally in 85% idio-U and 70% JIA-U. Only 5 patients (4%) had visual impairment in one, but none in both eyes. Uveitis activity by SUN classification was 0 + in 81% and 72%, 0.5 + in 19% and 25%, and 1 + in 0% and 3% in the idio-U and JIA-U, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with uveitis have good visual acuity and a low rate for visual impairment. In addition, modern treatment with DMARDs and bDMARDs seems to save vision.

Outcome of adalimumab monotherapy in paediatric non-infectious uveitis

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab in combination with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) such as methotrexate has a proven efficacy in the management of paediatric non-infectious uveitis. However, many children experience significant intolerance to methotrexate while on this combination, leaving a dilemma for clinicians for choosing the subsequent therapeutic roadmap. Continuation of adalimumab monotherapy might be an alternative feasible option under such settings. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of adalimumab monotherapy in paediatric non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

Children with non-infectious uveitis on adalimumab monotherapy (from August 2015 to June 2022) following intolerance to accompanying methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil were included in this retrospective study. Data were collected at the initiation of adalimumab monotherapy and at three monthly intervals until the last visit. The primary outcome was to evaluate disease control on adalimumab monotherapy as determined by the proportion of patients who had less than a 2-step worsening in uveitis (as per SUN score) and no additional systemic immunosuppression during follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were visual outcome, complications and side-effect profile of adalimumab monotherapy.

RESULTS

Data was collected for 28 patients (56 eyes). The most common uveitis type and course were anterior and chronic uveitis respectively. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis was the most common underlying diagnosis. During the study period, 23 (82.14%) of the study subjects met the primary outcome. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis 81.25% (95% CI; 60.6-91.7%) children maintained remission at 12 months on adalimumab monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of adalimumab monotherapy is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis in children who are intolerant to the combination of adalimumab and methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil.

Significance of the immunofluorescence staining patterns and titres of the antinuclear antibody test in paediatric rheumatology setting

BACKGROUND

Antinuclear antibody (ANA) is among the most frequently ordered tests in paediatric rheumatology setting. Diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus and Sjögren syndrome is closely related with a positive ANA and classified as ANA associated diseases. Besides, ANA test is ordered in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to assess the risk for uveitis and a positive ANA could be detected in children with nonrheumaticrheumatic conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate frequency of positive ANA in paediatric rheumatology setting and the association of immunofluorescence staining patterns and titres of ANA with rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

: Immunofluorescence staining patterns, and titres of the ANA and diagnoses of children who tested for ANA between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

Among 2477 patients with ANA tested, 28.1% had a positive ANA result. Among them, 39.2% had a diagnosis of a rheumatic disease. Most common rheumatic diagnosis was JIA (43.8%) and ANA associated diseases were observed in 24.5% of the patients with a rheumatic diagnosis. While ANA associated diseases had significantly more frequent homogenous staining, dense fine speckled pattern was significantly more common in children with nonrheumatic diagnoses. Despite ANA associated diseases was found to be significantly associated with higher titres, no difference was observed between patients with JIA and nonrheumatic conditions.

DISCUSSION

Our study showed that the majority of children with a positive ANA test were not diagnosed with a rheumatic disease. While titres and patterns of ANA were found to be important in diagnosis of rheumatic diseases, ordering ANA test with solid indications might give improved probability of rheumatic diagnoses in children with a positive test.

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for uveitis

To facilitate the integration of eye care into universal health coverage, the WHO is developing a Package of Eye Care Interventions (PECI). Development of the PECI involves the identification of evidence-based interventions from relevant clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for uveitis.

A systematic review of CPGs published on uveitis between 2010 and March 2020 was conducted. CPGs passing title and abstract and full-text screening were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool and data on recommended interventions extracted using a standard data extraction sheet.

Of 56 CPGs identified as potentially relevant from the systematic literature search, 3 CPGs underwent data extraction following the screening stages and appraisal with the AGREE II tool. These CPGs covered screening for, monitoring and treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis, the use of adalimumab and dexamethasone in treating non-infectious uveitis, and a top-level summary of assessment, differential diagnosis and referral recommendations for uveitis, aimed at primary care practitioners. Many of the recommendations were based on expert opinion, though some incorporated clinical study and randomised controlled trial data.

There is currently sparse coverage of the spectrum of disease caused by uveitis within CPGs. This may partially be due to the large number of conditions with diverse causes and clinical presentations covered by the umbrella term uveitis, which makes numerous sets of guidelines necessary. The limited pool of CPGs to select from has implications for clinicians seeking guidance on clinical care strategies for uveitis.

Secukinumab in enthesitis-related arthritis and juvenile psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treatment withdrawal, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment options in patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) are currently limited. This trial aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with active ERA and JPsA with inadequate response to conventional therapy.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treatment-withdrawal, phase 3 trial, biologic-naïve patients (aged 2 to <18 years) with active disease were treated with open-label subcutaneous secukinumab (75/150 mg in patients <50/≥50 kg) in treatment period (TP) 1 up to week 12, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) American College of Rheumatology 30 responders at week 12 were randomised 1:1 to secukinumab or placebo up to 100 weeks. Patients who flared in TP2 immediately entered open-label secukinumab TP3 that lasted up to week 104. Primary endpoint was time to disease flare in TP2.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients (median age, 14 years) entered open-label secukinumab in TP1. In TP2, responders (ERA, 44/52; JPsA, 31/34) received secukinumab or placebo. The study met its primary end point and demonstrated a statistically significant longer time to disease flare in TP2 for ERA and JPsA with secukinumab versus placebo (27% vs 55%, HR, 0.28; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.63; p<0.001). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (per 100 patient-years (PY), 95% CI) for total patients were 290.7/100 PY (230.2 to 362.3) for adverse events and 8.2/100 PY (4.1 to 14.6) for serious adverse events in the overall JIA population.

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab demonstrated significantly longer time to disease flare than placebo in children with ERA and JPsA with a consistent safety profile with the adult indications of psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03031782.

Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly used in infants, children, and adolescents worldwide; however, despite sufficient evidence of the beneficial effects of NSAIDs in children and adolescents, there is a lack of comprehensive data in infants. The present review summarizes the current knowledge on the safety and efficacy of various NSAIDs used in infants for which data are available, and includes ibuprofen, dexibuprofen, ketoprofen, flurbiprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, ketorolac, indomethacin, niflumic acid, meloxicam, celecoxib, parecoxib, rofecoxib, acetylsalicylic acid, and nimesulide. The efficacy of NSAIDs has been documented for a variety of conditions, such as fever and pain. NSAIDs are also the main pillars of anti-inflammatory treatment, such as in pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Limited data are available on the safety of most NSAIDs in infants. Adverse drug reactions may be renal, gastrointestinal, hematological, or immunologic. Since NSAIDs are among the most frequently used drugs in the pediatric population, safety and efficacy studies can be performed as part of normal clinical routine, even in young infants. Available data sources, such as (electronic) medical records, should be used for safety and efficacy analyses. On a larger scale, existing data sources, e.g. adverse drug reaction programs/networks, spontaneous national reporting systems, and electronic medical records should be assessed with child-specific methods in order to detect safety signals pertinent to certain pediatric age groups or disease entities. To improve the safety of NSAIDs in infants, treatment needs to be initiated with the lowest age-appropriate or weight-based dose. Duration of treatment and amount of drug used should be regularly evaluated and maximum dose limits and other recommendations by the manufacturer or expert committees should be followed. Treatment for non-chronic conditions such as fever and acute (postoperative) pain should be kept as short as possible. Patients with chronic conditions should be regularly monitored for possible adverse effects of NSAIDs.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis

BACKGROUND

Uveitis is the most common extra-articular manifestation of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and a potentially sight-threatening condition characterized by intraocular inflammation. Current treatment for JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-U) is largely based on physician experience, observational evidence and consensus guidelines, resulting in considerable variations in practice.  OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors used for treatment of JIA-U.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We last searched the electronic databases on 3 February 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TNF inhibitors with placebo in participants with a diagnosis of JIA and uveitis who were aged 2 to 18 years old.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology and graded the certainty of the body of evidence for seven outcomes using the GRADE classification.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs with 134 participants. One study conducted in the USA randomized participants to etanercept or placebo (N = 12). Two studies, one conducted in the UK (N = 90) and one in France (N = 32), randomized participants to adalimumab or placebo. All studies were at low risk of bias. Initial pooled estimates suggested that TNF-inhibitors may result in little to no difference on treatment success defined as 0 to trace cells on Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN)-grading; or two-step decrease in activity based on SUN grading (estimated risk ratio (RR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 2.10; 2 studies; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence) or treatment failure defined as a two-step increase in activity based on SUN grading (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.01 to 7.15; 1 study; 31 participants; low-certainty evidence). Further analysis using the individual trial definitions of treatment response and failure suggested a positive treatment effect of TNF inhibitors; a RR of treatment success of 2.60 (95% CI 1.30 to 5.20; 3 studies; 124 participants; low-certainty evidence), and RR of treatment failure of 0.23 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.50; 3 studies; 133 participants). Almost all the evidence was on adalimumab and the evidence on etanercept was very limited.  For secondary outcomes, one study suggests that adalimumab may have little to no effect on risk of recurrence after induction of remission at three months (RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.31 to 20.45; 90 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and visual acuity, but the evidence is very uncertain; mean difference in longitudinal logMAR score change over six months was -0.01 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03) and -0.02 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.03) using the best and worst logMAR measurement, respectively (low-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence from one study suggested that adalimumab treatment results in reduction of topical steroid doses at six months (hazard ratio 3.58; 95% CI 1.24 to 10.32; 74 participants who took one or more topical steroid per day at baseline). Adverse events, including injection site reactions and infections, were more common in the TNF inhibitor group. Serious adverse events were uncommon.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab appears to increase the likelihood of treatment success and decrease the likelihood of treatment failure when compared with placebo. The evidence was less conclusive about a positive treatment effect with etanercept. Adverse events from JIA-U trials are in keeping with the known side effect profile of TNF inhibitors. Standard validated JIA-U outcome measures are required to homogenize assessment and to allow for comparison and analysis of multiple datasets.

Methotrexate Monotherapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis: Myth or Reality?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIA-U).

METHODS

We analyzed a cohort of patients with JIA-U treated with MTX monotherapy, divided into two groups depending on whether MTX was started before (on-MTX group) or after uveitis diagnosis (MTX-naïve group). The primary endpoint was the time between uveitis inactivity and first relapse.

RESULTS

84 patients entered the study. The median duration of remission on MTX monotherapy resulted 8.2 months. The on-MTX group showed a significant longer time interval between arthritis and uveitis onset and higher need for biologic agents (bDMARD). During follow-up, 40 patients (47.6%) needed bDMARD due to poor control of uveitis. Clinical remission off medication was achieved in 11.9% of patients, all belonging to the MTX-naïve group.

CONCLUSIONS

MTX monotherapy, although effective in early stages of JIA-U, showed poor disease control in the long term.

Management of Non-Infectious Uveitis, a Selection of Topical Items Updating

First of all, we would like to thank all of the authors for their contributions and the editorial staff who enabled the achievement of this «Diagnosis and Management of Non-infectious Uveitis: Old and New Challenges» Special Issue [...]

Biologic therapies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most frequent rheumatic disease of childhood and uveitis is its most common extra-articular manifestation. JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-U) is one of the main causes of visual impairment in children and represents a major challenge for pediatrician and ophthalmologist, due to its insidious onset and sight-threatening complications. Topical glucocorticoids are the first line of treatment, followed by conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), usually methotrexate (MTX). In recent years, new biological drugs targeting specific molecules involved in disease pathogenesis, have significantly improved the prognosis of the disease, especially for cases refractory to conventional therapies. In this review we discuss the role of biological agents in JIA-U, focusing on cytokine blockers and cell-targeted therapies aimed to control ocular inflammation.

Management Strategies of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Chronic Anterior Uveitis: Current Perspectives

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common extraocular disease associated with pediatric uveitis. Despite the growing knowledge about the pathogenetic and clinical characteristics of the disease, it still remains a challenge for both the pediatric rheumatologist and ophthalmologist. Since uveitis is asymptomatic in most cases, it is generally detected by parents in a late phase of the disease when complications have occurred with consequent severe vision loss. Improvement in attentive screening and early treatment initiation to suppress inflammation has considerably reduced the sight-threatening outcomes of JIA-associated chronic anterior uveitis (JIA-CAU). Initial treatment with topical steroids is effective in most cases. However, more severe cases require the use of periocular or systemic corticosteroids, possibly leading to long-term complications. These include growth retardation, cataract and glaucoma. Systemic immunosuppressive agents are then employed in patients resistant to first-line therapy or to reduce steroid-associated complications. In this review, we will discuss the immunosuppressant agents currently employed for the treatment of the disease, including anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α biologics approved or not by the regulatory agencies. We will also highlight how new therapeutic options like biologic targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) co-stimulatory molecule, interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) or B lymphocytes might represent exciting new options for patients resistant to conventional therapy. Finally, the potential use of janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors recently approved for the treatment of several inflammatory rheumatic diseases in adults will be also discussed.

A Review of Systemic Biologics and Local Immunosuppressive Medications in Uveitis

Uveitis is one of the most common causes of vision loss and blindness worldwide. Local and/or systemic immunosuppression is often required to treat ocular inflammation in noninfectious uveitis. An understanding of safety and efficacy of these medications is required to individualize treatment to each patient to ensure compliance and achieve the best outcome. In this article, we reviewed the effectiveness of systemic biologic response modifiers and local treatments commonly used in the management of patients with noninfectious uveitis.

Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy.

RESULTS

The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase.

DISCUSSION

Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX.

CONCLUSION

MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an umbrella term for arthritis of unknown origin, lasting for >6 weeks with onset before 16 years of age. JIA is the most common chronic inflammatory rheumatic condition of childhood. According to the International League Against Rheumatism (ILAR) classification, seven mutually exclusive categories of JIA exist based on disease manifestations during the first 6 months of disease. Although the ILAR classification has been useful to foster research, it has been criticized mainly as it does not distinguish those forms of chronic arthritis observed in adults and in children from those that may be unique to childhood. Hence, efforts to provide a new evidence-based classification are ongoing. Similar to arthritis observed in adults, pathogenesis involves autoimmune and autoinflammatory mechanisms. The field has witnessed a remarkable improvement in therapeutic possibilities of JIA owing to the availability of new potent drugs and the possibility to perform controlled trials with support from legislative interventions and large networks availability. The goal of drug therapy in JIA is to rapidly reduce disease activity to inactive disease or clinical remission, minimize drug side effects and achieve a quality of life comparable to that of healthy peers. As JIA can influence all aspects of a child's and their family's life, researchers increasingly recognize improvement of health-related quality of life as a key treatment goal.

Value of Literature Review to Inform Development and Use of Biologics in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common pediatric inflammatory rheumatic diseases (PiRDs). Uncontrolled disease activity is associated with decreased quality of life and chronic morbidity. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have considerably improved clinical outcomes. For optimized patient care, understanding the efficacy-safety profile of biologics in subgroups of JIA is crucial. This systematic review based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to assess efficacy and safety data for bDMARDs and JAKi with various JIA subgroups after 3 months of treatment.

METHODS

Data for American College of Rheumatology (ACR) pediatric (Pedi) 30, 50, and/or 70 responses after 3 months of treatment were selected from RCTs investigating bDMARDs or JAKi in JIA according to predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Treatment and control arms were compared by calculating risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and proportions of overall, serious adverse events (AEs) and infections were analyzed. Forest plots were generated to summarize efficacy and safety endpoints across studies, JIA subgroups, and type of biologics.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight out of 41 PiRD RCTs investigated bDMARD or JAKi treatments in JIA. 9 parallel RCTs reported ACR Pedi 30, 50, and/or 70 responses 3 months after treatment initiation. All treatment arms showed improved ACR Pedi responses over controls. RRs ranged from 1.05 to 3.73 in ACR Pedi 30, from 1.20 to 7.90 in ACR Pedi 50, and from 1.19 to 8.73 in ACR Pedi 70. An enhanced effect for ACR Pedi 70 was observed with infliximab combined with methotrexate in PJIA vs. methotrexate monotherapy. A slightly higher risk of gastrointestinal AEs and infections was observed with treatment arms compared to placebo or methotrexate monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Investigated bDMARDs and JAKi showed superior treatment responses compared to controls after 3 months of treatment, which were more pronounced in ACR Pedi 50 and 70 than in ACR Pedi 30. Higher susceptibility to infections associated with bDMARDs or JAKi vs. control arms must be weighed against efficacious treatment of the underlying disease and prevention of disease-related damage. Additional RCTs are warranted to further inform development and utilization of biologics in JIA.

Tocilizumab and Abatacept for the Treatment of Childhood Chronic Uveitis: A Monocentric Comparison Experience

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Tocilizumab and Abatacept for treating Childhood Chronic non-infectious Uveitis (CCU), resistant to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment.

METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective charts review study (January 2010-April 2021) recruiting CCU, refractory to anti-TNF. To be included, children should have active uveitis at the time of Tocilizumab (8 mg/kg, every 4 weeks) or Abatacept (10 mg/kg, every 4 weeks). The main outcome was the achievement of ocular remission on treatment defined as the absence of flares for ≥ 6 months.

RESULTS

In this study, 18 patients with CCU (14 F), previously treated with Methotrexate and Adalimumab, were enrolled: 15 had juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (83.3%), 2 idiopathic (11.1%), and 1 Behçet (5.6%). Furthermore, ten patients received Abatacept and 8 patients received Tocilizumab. The mean duration of treatment on Abatacept was 31.6 months (SD ± 30.8), on Tocilizumab 25.25 months (SD ± 17.8). In total, 13 children (72.2%) achieved remission, with a better remission rate for the Tocilizumab group (8/8) compared to the Abatacept group (5/10) (χ² 5.53, p = 0.019). No difference was evaluated between the two groups in the proportion of patients who showed flares during the treatment (2/6 Abatacept vs. 1/8 Tocilizumab). A significant difference was evaluated in the proportion of patients who flared after treatment discontinuation: 3/3 Abatacept vs. 0/3 Tocilizumab (χ² 3.8, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

Even though this is a monocentric retrospective study, in a relatively small group, our study suggests a superior efficacy of Tocilizumab over Abatacept for treating anti-TNF refractory CCU.

Pediatric uveitis: Role of the pediatrician

The challenges of childhood uveitis lie in the varied spectrum of its clinical presentation, the often asymptomatic nature of disease, and the evolving nature of the phenotype alongside normal physiological development. These issues can lead to delayed diagnosis which can cause significant morbidity and severe visual impairment. The most common ocular complications include cataracts, band keratopathy, glaucoma, and macular oedema, and the various associated systemic disorders can also result in extra-ophthalmic morbidity. Pediatricians have an important role to play. Their awareness of the various presentations and etiologies of uveitis in children afford the opportunity of prompt diagnosis before complications arise. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common associated disorders seen in childhood uveitis, but there is a need to recognize other causes. In this review, different causes of uveitis are explored, including infections, autoimmune and autoinflammatory disease. As treatment is often informed by etiology, pediatricians can ensure early ophthalmological referral for children with inflammatory disease at risk of uveitis and can support management decisions for children with uveitis and possible underling multi-system inflammatory disease, thus reducing the risk of the development of irreversible sequelae.

Risk Factors Leading to Anti-TNF Alpha Therapies in Pediatric Severe Uveitis

PURPOSE

Pediatric uveitis is the leading cause of acquired child blindness, due to unremitting inflammation and long-term steroid exposition. Biotherapies with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) are effective in controlling inflammation for severe pediatric uveitis in recent studies. Major concern of anti-TNFα prescription is the balance between the severity of the disease and side effects of the drug. The aim of the present study is to describe a cohort of children with severe uveitis and to highlight the risk factors for a pejorative development that led to the prescription of anti-TNFα drugs.

METHOD

A retrospective case-control study was carried out on children with uveitis associated with systemic inflammatory disease or idiopathic uveitis, with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Anti-TNFα-treated patients (case) were studied and compared with patients who were not requiring anti-TNFα (control). Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to compare both groups and determine the risk factors for anti-TNFα therapy.

RESULTS

Seventy-three cases of pediatric uveitis were included, 13 cases and 60 controls. The risk factors associated with increased odds of anti-TNFα therapy were initial systemic disorder associated with uveitis [OR = 11.22 (1.37-91.85), p = 0.0241), family history of autoimmune diseases [OR = 9.43 (2.27-39.15), p = 0.0020], uveitis diagnosis before the age of 6 [OR = 4.05 (1.16-14.13), p = 0.0284], eye surgery [OR = 26.22 (2.63-261.77), p = 0.0054], ocular complications at the first slit lamp exam [OR = 67.11 (3.78-1191.69), p = 0.0042], low visual acuity at diagnosis (≥0.3 logMAR) [OR = 11.76 (2.91-47.62), p = 0.0005] and especially low binocular acuity at diagnosis (≥0.3 logMAR) [OR = 8.75 (1.93-39.57), p = 0.0048], panuveitis [OR = 9.17 (2.23-37.60), p = 0.0021], having positive ANA [OR = 3.89 (1.07-14.11), p = 0.0391], and positive HLA B27 [OR = 9.43 (2.27-39.16), p = 0.0020].

CONCLUSION

Those risk factors could be used to establish a new follow-up and treatment schedule for severe uncontrolled uveitis. This could help to better predict the best time to start anti-TNF therapy.

Follow-up Findings of Non-infectious Pediatric Uveitis Patients

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to describe the demographic and clinical findings of children with uveitis at a tertiary pediatric rheumatology and ophthalmology center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 46 patients who were diagnosed with uveitis before the age of 16 years and were followed regularly for at least 6 months between January 2013 and June 2019. Demographic data, uveitis characteristics, underlying diseases, systemic treatment modalities, drug side effects, complications, and surgical intervention were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty-three eyes of 46 patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis of uveitis was 9.2±4.5 (1.6-15.6) years, and the mean uveitis follow-up period was 54±41 (6-191) months. Twenty-one patients (45.7%) had uveitis associated with rheumatologic diseases. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis was the most common disease (23.9%). Visual acuity was categorized as moderately impaired in 6 eyes (7.2%), severely impaired in 4 eyes (4.8%), and blindness in 1 eye (1.2%). Methotrexate (87%) was the most frequently used systemic immunosuppressive agent in treatment. Adalimumab (73.9%) was added to treatment in resistant cases. Thirty-five patients (76.1%) had complications in at least 1 eye secondary to uveitis or uveitis treatment. Posterior synechiae (11 eyes, 13.2%) was the most common complication during treatment.

CONCLUSION

In order to preserve visual acuity, pediatric uveitis should be recognized early and especially persistent/chronic cases should be started on effective systemic treatment immediately.

Uveitis in Children and Adolescents

Childhood noninfectious uveitis leads to sight-threatening complications. Idiopathic chronic anterior uveitis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis are most common. Inflammation arises from an immune response against antigens within the eye. Ophthalmic work-up evaluates anatomic involvement, disease activity, ocular complications, and disease course. Local and/or systemic glucocorticoids are initial treatment, but not as long-term sole therapy to avoid glucocorticoids-induced toxicity or persistent ocular inflammation. Children with recurrent, refractory, or severe disease require systemic immunosuppression with methotrexate and/or anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody medications (adalimumab, infliximab). Goals of early detection and treatment are to optimize vision in childhood uveitis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis in the era of biological therapy: how the disease changed in more than 20 years of observation in a tertiary referral center in Rome (Italy)

Objectives

To describe the ophthalmological characteristics in a Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) cohort and to evaluate how therapeutic advances have changed the course of the uveitis.

Methods

Analysis of a retrospective cohort study of consecutive JIA pediatric patients including JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-U) and comparison with a previous study in the same uveitis center assessed before the wide-spread of biological therapy.

Results

The total of 49 JIA patients were analyzed, of whom 18 JIA-U, compared with a JIA-U past cohort of 66 patients. Systemic corticosteroids were used significantly less in the current JIA-U group (p = 0.008) than in the past one. JIA-U present cohort was on therapy more frequently with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) than the past group (p = 0.039), mostly treated with methotrexate (93.3%). Furthermore, a larger use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) was described in the current JIA-U group (p = 0.005) also associated with csDMARDs (p = 0.003). Adalimumab was used more (72.7%) in the present JIA-U cohort compared to a larger treatment with infliximab (61.5%) in the past (p = 0.005). Higher number of uveitis recurrences was observed in the previous cohort compared to the current one (p = 0.005). Fewer complications were described in this study than in the previous: posterior synechiae (p = 0.007), cataract (p < 0.001), band keratopathy (p < 0.001), and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) (p = 0.047).

Conclusion

Current therapies reduced the uveitis recurrences and ocular complications including cataract due also to the lower use of corticosteroids. The new close collaboration with the pediatric rheumatologic center in the same University has contributed to the care improvement and decrease of uveitis complications.

Adalimumab in patients with vision-threatening uveitis: real-world clinical experience

Objectives

Biologics are rapidly emerging as an effective vision saving addition to systemic uveitis therapy. The aim of this multicentre retrospective study is to review the outcomes of a large group of patients treated with adalimumab.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients with refractory non-infectious, active uveitis treated with adalimumab was conducted. The main outcome measures were ability to reduce prednisolone dose, ability to control uveitis, final visual acuity and time to treatment failure.

Results

Forty-six patients with uveitis, treated with adalimumab were included in the study. The most common anatomical uveitis phenotype was panuveitis (n=17, 37.0%). The most common diagnosis was idiopathic uveitis (n=19, 41.3%). At their latest review (mean: 4.46 years; median 4.40 years), 35 (76.1%) patients were able to discontinue corticosteroids, 11 (23.9%) patients were able to taper to <7.5 mg/day and only 1 (2.2%) patient required 10 mg of prednisone. The mean visual acuity at the latest follow-up of the worse eye was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) 0.42 (SD 0.72), while the mean visual acuity of the better eye was logMAR 0.19 (SD 0.34). Of the 89 eyes, 21 (23.6%) eyes improved by at least 2 lines, 5 eyes (5.6%) deteriorated by ≥2 lines while vision was unchanged in the remaining 63 (70.8%) eyes. The time to recurrence was 1 in 12.47 person-years for adalimumab, with a 17.4% (8 patient) relapse rate. There were no serious adverse events.

Conclusions

This study highlights the efficacy of adalimumab in patients with vision-threatening non-infectious uveitis, preserving vision and allowing reduction of corticosteroid dose.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis or chronic anterior antinuclear antibody-positive uveitis: study protocol for an open-label, adalimumab active-controlled phase 3 clinical trial (JUVE-BRIGHT)

Background

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common pediatric rheumatic disease and the most common systemic disorder associated with uveitis in childhood. Uveitis is more common in JIA patients who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive, have an early-onset disease, and have oligoarticular arthritis. JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-uveitis) is typically anterior, chronic, bilateral, nongranulomatous, and asymptomatic. Visual outcomes in JIA-uveitis have improved with current screening and treatment options; however, many patients fail to respond or do not achieve long-lasting remission. Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and 2 inhibitor, may impact key cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of JIA-uveitis or ANA-positive uveitis, representing a potential novel treatment option for disease management.

Methods

The multicenter, phase 3 trial will be conducted using an open-label Bayesian design. The study will enroll at least 20 and up to 40 patients aged 2 to <18 years with active JIA-uveitis or chronic ANA-positive uveitis without systemic features. At least 20 patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate (MTX-IR), but not biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), will be randomized (1:1) to open-label baricitinib or adalimumab. Approximately 20 additional patients who are MTX-IR or bDMARD inadequate responders will receive baricitinib treatment. Patients will be treated with once daily oral baricitinib at a fixed dose by age group (4 mg for patients aged ≥6 to <18 years and 2 mg for patients <6 years) or adalimumab (20 mg for patients weighing <30 kg and 40 mg for patients ≥30 kg) as a subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks. Treatment with stable background conventional synthetic DMARDs, low-dose corticosteroids, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is allowed. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with response at week 24. Patients may continue treatment for up to 5 years.

Discussion

This is the first pediatric clinical trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of a JAK inhibitor in JIA-uveitis or chronic ANA-positive uveitis. A novel Bayesian design is used to assess the efficacy of baricitinib, including an adalimumab reference arm, in this small patient population with unmet medical need.

Trial registration

EudraCT 2019-000119-10. Registered on January 4, 2019; NCT04088409. Registered on September 12, 2019

Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in pediatric population, with uveitis as the most common and severe extra-articular manifestation. Eye damage (bilateral in 70-80% of cases) is usually anterior, chronic and asymptomatic. Young age, female gender, oligoarticular form and ANA positivity are risk factors for chronic anterior uveitis (CAU). Acute anterior uveitis (AAU) frequently occurs in HLA-B27 positive boys with enthesitis-related arthritis. The onset is on average 1.8 years after the onset of JIA, but it may also precede the articular manifestations. Ophthalmological screening for JIA is recommended every 3 or 6-12 months depending on the combination of risk factors for associated uveitis. The major purpose of the treatment is to minimize the loss of visual acuity. The treatment is topical (corticosteroids, cycloplegics) and systemic (short-term glucocorticoids, methotreexate, biological drugs). Biological therapy (indicated if previous treatments are ineffective) is using anti-TNF drugs as first choice (most studies are indicating sup erior efficiency for Adalimumab). Usually AAU is treated promptly and no systemic treatment is needed. In some cases the evolution of CAU can lead to severe complications (synechiaes, cataract, glaucoma, even blindness). Interdisciplinary approach involving the pediatric rheumatologist and ophthalmologist is essential for correct monitoring of this disease.

Biologic medicine inclusion in 138 national essential medicines lists

BACKGROUND

Essential medicines lists (EMLs) are intended to reflect the priority health care needs of populations. We hypothesized that biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are underrepresented relative to conventional DMARDs in existing national EMLs. We aimed to survey the extent to which biologic DMARDs are included in EMLs, to determine country characteristics contributing to their inclusion or absence, and to contrast this with conventional DMARD therapies.

METHODS

We searched 138 national EMLs for 10 conventional and 14 biologic DMARDs used in the treatment of childhood rheumatologic diseases. Via regression modelling, we determined country characteristics accounting for differences in medicine inclusion between national EMLs.

RESULTS

Eleven countries (7.97%) included all 10 conventional DMARDs, 115 (83.33%) ≥5, and all countries listed at least one. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was associated with the total number of conventional DMARDs included (β₁1.02 [95% CI 0.39, 1.66]; P = 0.00279). Among biologic DMARDs, 3 countries (2.2%) listed ≥10, 15 (10.9%) listed ≥5, and 47 (34.1%) listed at least one. Ninety-one (65.9%) of countries listed no biologic DMARDs. European region (β₁ 1.30 [95% CI 0.08, 2.52]; P = 0.0367), life expectancy (β₁-0.70 [95% CI -1.22, - 0.18]; P = 0.0085), health expenditure per capita (β₁ 1.83 [95% CI 1.24, 2.42]; P < 0.001), and conventional DMARDs listed (β₁ 0.70 [95% CI 0.33, 1.07]; P < 0.001) were associated with the total number of biologic DMARDs included.

CONCLUSION

Biologic DMARDs are excluded from most national EMLs. By comparison, conventional DMARDs are widely included. Countries with higher health spending and longer life expectancy are more likely to list biologics.

Frequency of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and associated uveitis in pediatric rheumatology clinics in Turkey: A retrospective study, JUPITER

BACKGROUND

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), is the most common pediatric rheumatologic disorder with unknown etiology. Currently, no population-based data are available regarding the distribution of categories and frequency of uveitis in patients with JIA in Turkey. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of JIA-associated uveitis (JIAU) and distribution of JIA categories in a Turkish JIA cohort.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 500 randomized patients in four pediatric rheumatology clinics in Turkey.

RESULTS

Oligoarticular JIA (oJIA) was the most common JIA disease category in this study cohort (38.8%). The frequencies of the other categories were as follows: enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA), 23.2%; rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative polyarthritis, 15.6%; systemic arthritis, 12.2%; juvenile psoriatic arthritis, 5.2%; undifferentiated arthritis, 2.8%; and RF-positive polyarthritis, 2.2%. JIA-associated uveitis was observed in 6.8% of patients at a mean (Standard Deviation, SD) age of 9.1 (3.8) years over a mean JIA disease duration of 4 (1.9) years. Uveitis developed after joint disease, with a mean (SD) duration of 1.8 (1.9) years. Patients with oJIA had the highest rate of uveitis (12.9%) followed by patients with ERA (5.2%) and polyarticular RF-negative disease (3.8%). Compared with persistent oJIA, the extended oJIA category had a > 3-fold higher risk of uveitis (11.3% vs 27.7%; odds ratio, 3.38 [95% Confidence Interval, 1.09-10.4]). The most frequently administered drug after development of uveitis was tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (38.2%). Five patients (14.7%) had uveitis-related complications that required surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Turkish pediatric patients with JIA experience a lower frequency of oJIA and higher frequency of ERA than their white European counterparts; the occurrence of uveitis is also somewhat lower than expected. Geographic and ethnic factors may affect these differences and need further investigation.

Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of golimumab (GLM) as a treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)-associated uveitis refractory to adalimumab (ADA).

METHODS

Retrospective single-centre study including patients with JIA receiving GLM for active uveitis after failing ADA. JIA- and uveitis-related data, including intraocular inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity, corticosteroid-sparing potential, and ocular complications were evaluated at start of GLM treatment, at 1 month and 3 months, and every 3 months thereafter during GLM administration. We further investigated the association of response to GLM with primary and secondary failure of ADA treatment.

RESULTS

Ten patients were studied, all female (17 affected eyes, mean age 14.3 + 6.7 yrs., mean follow-up 25.2 + 21.7 mos). Two patients were switched to GLM because of primary non-response to ADA. Eight were switched because of loss of response (LOR). In 5 of the latter LOR was associated with neutralizing anti-ADA-antibodies. Response to GLM was observed in all 8 patients with LOR, while the 2 patients with primary non-response to ADA also did not respond to GLM. Three of the 8 responders experienced LOR. At the end of follow-up 4 of the 5 remaining responders had achieved complete response. One had achieved partial response.

CONCLUSION

GLM is an efficacious therapeutic option in patients who experience LOR to ADA. Our data indicate that patients without primary response to ADA should be rather switched to a biologic agent with a different mode of action instead of further blocking the TNF-alpha pathway.

A peptide-based anti-Adalimumab antibody assay to monitor immune response to biologics treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and childhood chronic non-infectious uveitis

Immune response to biologics treatment, while widely reported, yet fails to correlate with clinical outcomes and assay to assay comparison is often not possible. Hence, we developed a new peptide based-detection assay to stratify pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or chronic non-infectious uveitis (CNU) and monitor anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) formed as part of an immune response to treatment with the fully human monoclonal therapeutic antibody Adalimumab. Adalimumab derived synthetic peptides were optimized for maximum immunogenicity and were tested by SP-ELISA on a development cohort of 18 JIA and CNU treated patients. The two best performing peptides able to differentiate patient groups were selected for evaluation with a larger scale ELISA testing on a total of 29 sera from pediatric patients with JIA or CNU. The results of this peptide-based assay were compared to an in-house developed SPR biosensor ADAbs assay and a commercially available bridging ELISA. The first peptide, termed HC3, was able to positively detect ADAbs in 7 out of the 29 sera, while the second peptide, called LC3, was able to detect ADAbs in 11 out of 29 sera in the evaluation group. Following statistical data evaluation, it has been found that the detection of ADAbs using the peptide-based ELISA assay positively correlates with disease progression and remission. Two synthetic peptides derived from Adalimumab may provide a beneficial tool to clinicians for monitoring patient response to such treatment and taking informed decisions for treatment alternatives.

Addressing Healthcare Quality in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis With a Universal Access Program

In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology, Concha, et al ¹ describe the effects of the implementation, in 2010, of a national, legally mandated universal access program (Explicit Health Guarantees [GES]) for guaranteed juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA) diagnosis and treatment in Chile. The GES program guarantees that evaluation by a specialist takes place less than 30 days after referral from primary care, and that treatment must start no later than 7 days after confirmation of diagnosis.

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Associated Uveitis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common childhood rheumatic disease. The development of associated uveitis represents a significant risk for serious complications, including permanent loss of vision. Initiation of early treatment is important for controlling JIA-uveitis, but the disease can appear asymptomatically, making frequent screening procedures necessary for patients at risk. As our understanding of pathogenic drivers is currently incomplete, it is difficult to assess which JIA patients are at risk of developing uveitis. Identification of specific risk factors for JIA-associated uveitis is an important field of research, and in this review, we highlight the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic factors identified as potential uveitis risk factors in JIA, and discuss therapeutic strategies.