Infrapatellar fat pad resection during total knee arthroplasty: yet another reason for?

Increased signal intensity, not volume variation of infrapatellar fat pad in knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) is regarded as an essential knee tissue involved in osteoarthritis (OA) for its potential structural-related or metabolism-related function. This cross-sectional study aims to identify which part is more related to OA.

METHODS

Patients with knee OA (n = 53) and healthy controls (n = 54) were prospectively recruited. Based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging with a slice thickness of only 0.35 mm, IPFP structural-related parameters (volume and maximal area), metabolism-related parameter (signal), degeneration indicators, and patellar maltracking indicators (patellar translation, patellofemoral angle, and Insall-Salvati ratio) were measured. IPFP volume (maximal area, and signal) was compared between healthy controls and OA patients. The level of significance for all comparisons was set as .05.

RESULTS

OA patients had higher IPFP signal (672.9 ± 136.9 vs 567.3 ± 63.6, p = .009), but no significant difference in IPFP volume or maximal area compared with healthy controls. In healthy controls, IPFP signal was positively associated with age (β = 1.481; 95% CI: 0.286-2.676; p = .018); IPFP maximal area was positively related to Insall-Salvati ratio (β = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.0003-0.0017; p = .039), but not associated with patellar translation and patellofemoral angle. In OA patients, IPFP signal was positively associated with cartilage loss (β = 0.005; 95% CI: 0.003-0.007; p = .013); no correlation between knee pain and IPFP volume or maximal area was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolism-related function of IPFP, which can be reflected by the IPFP signal, might play a more critical role in OA progression than its structural function.