1
|
Bertrand D, Joly J, Neerinckx B, Durez P, Lenaerts J, Joos R, Thevissen K, Zwaenepoel T, Vanhoof J, Di Romana S, Taelman V, Van Essche E, Corluy L, Ribbens C, Vanden Berghe M, Devinck M, Ajeganova S, Durnez A, Boutsen Y, Margaux J, Peene I, Van Offel J, Doumen M, Pazmino S, De Meyst E, Kulyk M, Creten N, Westhovens R, Verschueren P. Effectiveness of methotrexate and bridging glucocorticoids with or without early introduction of a 6-month course of etanercept in early RA: results of the 2-year, pragmatic, randomised CareRA2020 trial. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004535. [PMID: 39117445 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate if patients with early rheumatoid arthritis responding insufficiently to initial methotrexate (MTX) and bridging glucocorticoids (GCs) could benefit from early but temporary etanercept introduction as a second remission-induction attempt. METHODS CareRA2020 (NCT03649061) was a 2-year, open-label, multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Treatment-naïve patients started MTX and GC bridging (COBRA-Slim: CS). Within a time window from week (W) 8 until W32, early insufficient responders (28-joint Disease Activity Score - C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) >3.2 between W8 and W32 or ≥2.6 at W32) were randomised to a Standard-CS strategy (adding leflunomide first) or Bio-induction-CS strategy (adding etanercept for 24 weeks). Additional treatment adaptations followed the treat-to-target principle. Longitudinal disease activity (DAS28-CRP) over 104 weeks (primary outcome), achievement of DAS28-CRP <2.6 28 weeks after randomisation, and biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (b/tsDMARD) use at W104 were compared between randomisation groups. RESULTS Following CS treatment, 142 patients were early responders; 55 early insufficient responders received Standard-CS and 55 Bio-induction-CS. Superiority of Bio-induction-CS over Standard-CS could not be demonstrated (ß=-0.204, (95% CI -0.486 to 0.078), p=0.157) for the primary outcome. More patients on Bio-induction-CS achieved DAS28-CRP <2.6 at 28 weeks after randomisation (59% (95% CI 44% to 72%) vs 44% (95% CI 31% to 59%) in Standard-CS) and they were treated less frequently with b/tsDMARDs at W104 (19/55, 35%) compared with Standard-CS (29/55, 53%). CONCLUSION Half of the patients responded well to initial COBRA-Slim induction therapy. In early insufficient responders, adding etanercept for 6 months did not improve disease control over 104 weeks versus adding leflunomide first. However, temporary introduction of etanercept resulted in improved disease control early after randomisation and less patients on b/tsDMARDs at W104. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03649061. CTR PILOT APPROVAL BELGIUM S59474, EudraCT number: 2017-004054-41.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Bertrand
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Johan Joly
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Barbara Neerinckx
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Patrick Durez
- Department of Rheumatology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Jan Lenaerts
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
- Reuma Instituut, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Rik Joos
- Department of Rheumatology, ZNA Jan Palfijn, Merksem, Belgium
| | - Kristof Thevissen
- Reumacentrum, Genk, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Limburg, Belgium
| | - Tom Zwaenepoel
- Department of Rheumatology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | | | - Silvana Di Romana
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Veerle Taelman
- Department of Rheumatology, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
| | - Els Van Essche
- Department of Rheumatology, Imeldaziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Luk Corluy
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Herentals, Herentals, Belgium
| | - Clio Ribbens
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Marc Vanden Berghe
- Department of Rheumatology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi Site Saint-Joseph, Gilly, Hainaut, Belgium
| | - Mieke Devinck
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Sint-Lucas Brugge, Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Sofia Ajeganova
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Durnez
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Jan Portaels, Vilvoorde, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium
| | - Yves Boutsen
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Namur, Belgium
| | - Joëlle Margaux
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Erasme, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Peene
- Department of Rheumatology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge AV, Brugge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Jan Van Offel
- Department of Rheumatology, UZA, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Michaël Doumen
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Sofia Pazmino
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | - Elias De Meyst
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Myroslava Kulyk
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Bogomolets National Medical University, Kiiv, Ukraine
| | | | - René Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu J, Idborg H, Korotkova M, Lend K, van Vollenhoven R, Lampa J, Rudin A, Nordström D, Gudbjornsson B, Gröndal G, Uhlig T, Hørslev-Petersen K, Lund Hetland M, Østergaard M, Nurmohamed M, Jakobsson PJ. Urinary prostanoids are elevated by anti-TNF and anti-IL6 receptor disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs but are not predictive of response to treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2024; 26:61. [PMID: 38444034 PMCID: PMC10913231 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03295-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are widely used for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there are no established biomarkers to predict a patient's response to these therapies. Prostanoids, encompassing prostaglandins, prostacyclins, and thromboxanes, are potent lipid mediators implicated in RA progression. Nevertheless, the influence of DMARDs on prostanoid biosynthesis in RA patients remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the impact of various DMARDs on urinary prostanoids levels and to explore whether urinary prostanoid profiles correlate with disease activity or response to therapy. METHODS This study included 152 Swedish female patients with early RA, all rheumatoid factor (RF) positive, enrolled in the NORD-STAR trial (registration number: NCT01491815). Participants were randomized into four therapeutic regimes: methotrexate (MTX) combined with (i) prednisolone (arm ACT), (ii) TNF-α blocker certolizumab pegol (arm CZP), (iii) CTLA-4Ig abatacept (arm ABA), or (iv) IL-6R blocker tocilizumab (arm TCZ). Urine samples, collected before start of treatment and at 24 weeks post-treatment, were analyzed for tetranor-prostaglandin E metabolite (tPGEM), tetranor-prostaglandin D metabolite (tPGDM), 2,3-dinor thromboxane B2 (TXBM), 2,3-dinor-6-keto prostaglandin F1a (PGIM), leukotriene E4 (LTE4) and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12-HETE) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to analyze the change in urinary eicosanoids and their correlations to clinical outcomes. RESULTS Patients receiving MTX combined with CZP or TCZ exhibited significant elevations in urinary tPGEM and TXBM levels after 24 weeks of treatment. Other eicosanoids did not show significant alterations in response to any treatment. Baseline urinary eicosanoid levels did not correlate with baseline clinical disease activity index (CDAI) levels, nor with changes in CDAI from baseline to week 24. Their levels were also similar between patients who achieved CDAI remission and those with active disease at week 24. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with anti-TNF or anti-IL6R agents in early RA patients leads to an increased systemic production of proinflammatory and prothrombotic prostanoids. However, urinary eicosanoid levels do not appear to be predictive of the response to DMARDs therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyang Liu
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Idborg
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marina Korotkova
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristina Lend
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Vollenhoven
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jon Lampa
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Rudin
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, University of Gothenburg Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dan Nordström
- Department of Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Department of Rheumatology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Gerdur Gröndal
- Department of Rheumatology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Till Uhlig
- Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kim Hørslev-Petersen
- Danish Hospital for the Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark
- University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre for Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Nurmohamed
- Department of Rheumatology and Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, The Netherlands
| | - Per-Johan Jakobsson
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Bergstra SA, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Verschueren P, de Souza S, Pope JE, Takeuchi T, Hyrich KL, Winthrop KL, Aletaha D, Stamm TA, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM. Efficacy of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:95-106. [PMID: 36368906 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To update the evidence on efficacy of DMARDs (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) and inform the taskforce of the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS This systematic literature review (SLR) investigated the efficacy of conventional synthetic (cs), biological (b), biosimilar and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs in patients with RA. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science were used to identify all relevant articles published since the previous update in 2019 to 14 January 2022. RESULTS Of 8969 search results, 169 articles were selected for detailed review and 47 were finally included. Trials investigated the efficacy of csDMARDs, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, DMARD switching, tapering and trials investigating different treatment strategies. The compounds investigated were csDMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine), bDMARDs (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol, denosumab, etanercept, infliximab, levilimab, olokizumab, opineracept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab) and tsDMARDs (baricitinib, filgotinib, tofacitinib, upadacitinib). The efficacy of csDMARDs+ short-term glucocorticoids in early RA was confirmed and similar to bDMARD+MTX combination therapy. Interleukin-6 pathway inhibition was effective in trials on olokizumab and levilimab. Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) was efficacious in different patient populations. After insufficient response to JAKi, patients could respond to TNFi treatment. Tapering of DMARDs was feasible for a proportion of patients, who were able to taper therapy while remaining in low disease activity or remission. CONCLUSION The results of this SLR, together with one SLR on safety of DMARD and one on glucocorticoids, informed the taskforce of the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for pharmacological management of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandre Sepriano
- CHRC Campus Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sytske Anne Bergstra
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Christopher John Edwards
- NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Patrick Verschueren
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven and Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Savia de Souza
- Patient Research Partner Network, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Janet E Pope
- Schulich School of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kevin L Winthrop
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Amsterdam Rheumatology Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Kleykamp BA, Draper-Rodi J, Vollert J, Chan J, Ferguson M, McNicol E, Phalip J, Evans SR, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Rice AS. Pragmatic trials of pain therapies: a systematic review of methods. Pain 2022; 163:21-46. [PMID: 34490854 PMCID: PMC8675058 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pragmatic randomised clinical trials aim to directly inform clinical or health policy decision making. Here, we systematically review methods and design of pragmatic trials of pain therapies to examine methods, identify common challenges, and areas for improvement. Seven databases were searched for pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trials that assessed pain treatment in a clinical population of adults reporting pain. All screening steps and data extractions were performed twice. Data were synthesised descriptively, and correlation analyses between prespecified trial features and PRECIS-2 (PRagmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2) ratings and attrition were performed. Protocol registration: PROSPERO-ID CRD42020178954. Of 57 included trials, only 21% assessed pharmacological interventions, the remainder physical, surgical, psychological, or self-management pain therapies. Three-quarters of the trials were comparative effectiveness designs, often conducted in multiple centres (median: 5; Q1/3: 1, 9.25) and with a median sample size of 234 patients at randomization (Q1/3: 135.5; 363.5). Although most trials recruited patients with chronic pain, reporting of pain duration was poor and not well described. Reporting was comprehensive for most general items, while often deficient for specific pragmatic aspects. Average ratings for pragmatism were highest for treatment adherence flexibility and clinical relevance of outcome measures. They were lowest for patient recruitment methods and extent of follow-up measurements and appointments. Current practice in pragmatic trials of pain treatments can be improved in areas such as patient recruitment and reporting of methods, analysis, and interpretation of data. These improvements will facilitate translatability to other real-world settings-the purpose of pragmatic trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bethea A. Kleykamp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Jerry Draper-Rodi
- Research Center, University College of Osteopathy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Vollert
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Chan
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - McKenzie Ferguson
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, United States
| | - Ewan McNicol
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jules Phalip
- European School of Osteopathy, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | - Scott R. Evans
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dennis C. Turk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Robert H. Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Andrew S.C. Rice
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shukla R, Emery P, Buch MH. Efficacy of tumour-necrosis factor-inhibitor in moderate disease activity rheumatoid arthritis: sub-analysis of the 'VEDERA' trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:868-869. [PMID: 34664622 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rudresh Shukla
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Foundation NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.,Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fitton J, Melville AR, Emery P, Nam JL, Buch MH. Real-world single centre use of JAK inhibitors across the rheumatoid arthritis pathway. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:4048-4054. [PMID: 33331938 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate real-world efficacy of approved JAK inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib and baricitinib in a large, single-centre cohort of RA patients across the treatment pathway, including those refractory to multiple biologic drugs. METHODS All RA patients, treated with tofacitinib (from time of compassionate access scheme) or baricitinib since approval in 2017 had DAS28-CRP scores and components recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months (with retrospective data for compassionate access scheme). Efficacy was evaluated in the total cohort, each treatment group, and subgroups of number of prior biologic classes failed. RESULTS One hundred and fifteen patients were treated with a JAKi (tofacitinib 54, baricitinib 69, 8 both); 76.4% female; mean (s.d.) age 57.3 (14.3) years. On average patients had received three previous bDMARDs; 11 (9.6%) were bDMARD naïve. Combined group baseline DAS28-CRP (s.d.) 5.62(1.14) improved by 1.49(1.44) and 1.67(1.61) at 3 and 6 months, respectively, comparable in individual JAKi groups; with 24% in at least low disease activity at 3 months. The biggest improvement was observed in the biologic-naïve group (mean DAS28-CRP improved from 5.16-2.14 after 6 months); while those with prior exposure to minimum three bDMARD classes had DAS28-CRP improvement of >1.2. Five out of 8 patients treated with both JAKi sequentially responded. Twelve patients previously unresponsive to IL-6 blockade responded to JAKi. No unexpected safety events were recorded. Two cases of venous thromboembolism were observed. CONCLUSION JAK inhibition is effective in a real-world population of RA patients, including in a subset of patients refractory to multiple previous bDMARDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Fitton
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew R Melville
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Jacqueline L Nam
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Maya H Buch
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.,Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jain S, Dhir V, Aggarwal A, Gupta R, Leishangthem B, Naidu S, Khullar A, Maurya S, Dhawan V, Sharma SK, Sharma A, Jain S. Comparison of two dose escalation strategies of methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80:1376-1384. [PMID: 34112656 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There are no head-to-head trials of different dose escalation strategies of methotrexate (MTX) in RA. We compared the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 'usual' (5 mg every 4 weeks) versus 'fast' (5 mg every 2 weeks) escalation of oral MTX. METHODS This multicentre, open-label (assessor blinded) RCT included patients 18-55 years of age having active RA with disease duration <5 years, and not on DMARDs. Patients were randomized 1:1 into usual or fast escalation groups, both groups starting MTX at 15 mg/week till a maximum of 25 mg/week. Primary outcome was EULAR good response at 16 weeks, secondary outcomes were ΔDAS28 and adverse effects (AE). Analyses were intention-to-treat. RESULTS 178 patients with mean DAS28-CRP of 5.4(1.1) were randomized to usual (n=89) or fast escalation groups (n=89). At 16 weeks, there was no difference in good EULAR response in the usual (28.1%) or fast escalation (22.5%) groups (p=0.8). There was no difference in mean ΔDAS28-CRP at 8 weeks (-0.9, -0.8, p=0.72) or 16 weeks (-1.3, -1.3, p=0.98). Even at 24 weeks (extended follow-up), responses were similar. There were no inter-group differences in ΔHAQ, or MTX-polyglutamates 1-3 levels at 8 or 16 weeks. Gastrointestinal AE were higher in the fast escalation group over initial 8 weeks (27%, 40%, p=0.048), but not over 16 weeks. There was no difference in cytopenias, transaminitis, or drug discontinuation/dose reduction between the groups. No serious AE were seen. CONCLUSION A faster MTX escalation strategy in RA was not more efficacious over 16-24 weeks, and did not significantly increase AE, except higher gastrointestinal AE initially. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CTRI/2018/12/016549.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Jain
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Varun Dhir
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Amita Aggarwal
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ranjan Gupta
- Department of Rheumatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Bidyalaxmi Leishangthem
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shankar Naidu
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Aastha Khullar
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Supriya Maurya
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Veena Dhawan
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Shefali Khanna Sharma
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Aman Sharma
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sanjay Jain
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muto S, Minamitani N, Ogura T, Nakajima A, Nakagawa K, Masaka T, Hiura S, Kobayashi H, Kato H, Kameda H. Good response to methotrexate is associated with a decrease in the gene expression of ABCG2, a drug transporter, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2021; 31:1079-1086. [PMID: 33492182 DOI: 10.1080/14397595.2021.1879429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Methotrexate (MTX) is used as an anchor drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although more than a half of the patients with RA require additional treatments. We designed a prospective study involving two medical centers in Japan to examine the association between the expression of MTX-related genes including a drug transporter ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2) gene and the clinical response to MTX in MTX-naive patients with RA. METHODS The primary endpoint of this study was good response based on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria by Disease Activity Score using 28-joint count (DAS28). We evaluated the association between the baseline expression of six genes involved in the intracellular pharmacokinetics of MTX, including ABCG2, as well as their temporal changes, and the clinical response at week 12 from the initiation of MTX. RESULTS Based on the clinical response at 12 weeks after the initiation of MTX, 24 patients were classified into good responders (n = 9) and non-good responders (n = 15; 10 moderate responders and 5 non-responders) groups. A univariate logistic regression analysis of the baseline gene expression levels to predict the EULAR good response at week 12 showed a significant association with ABCG2 expression alone. Furthermore, the rate of baseline expression of ABCG2 mRNA above the cut-off value determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve was higher in good responders than in non-good responders (p = .012). Moreover, ABCG2 expression decreased in almost all good responders, but not in non-good responders, after MTX treatment for 12 weeks (median -76% vs. +41% from baseline, respectively; p = .011). The ABCG2 expression level did not correlate with DAS28 at baseline or week 12. CONCLUSIONS Our study revealed that good response to MTX is associated with a decrease in the expression of ABCG2 in patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Muto
- Center of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nana Minamitani
- Center of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takehisa Ogura
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University (Ohashi Medical Center), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arata Nakajima
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University (Sakura Medical Center), Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Nakagawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toho University (Sakura Medical Center), Chiba, Japan
| | - Toru Masaka
- Center of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Pharmacy, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Sumiko Hiura
- Department of Pharmacy, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Kobayashi
- Department of Pharmacy, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Kato
- Center of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideto Kameda
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University (Ohashi Medical Center), Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Buch MH, Eyre S, McGonagle D. Persistent inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2020; 17:17-33. [PMID: 33293696 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-020-00541-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite nearly three decades of advances in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a substantial minority of patients are exposed to multiple DMARDs without necessarily benefitting from them; a group of patients variously designated as having 'difficult to treat', 'treatment-resistant' or 'refractory' RA. This Review of refractory RA focuses on two types of patients: those for whom multiple targeted therapies lack efficacy and who have persistent inflammatory pathology, which we designate as persistent inflammatory refractory RA (PIRRA); and those with supposed refractory RA who have continued disease activity that is predominantly independent of objective evidence of inflammation, which we designate as non-inflammatory refractory RA (NIRRA). These two types of disease are not mutually exclusive, but identifying those individuals with predominant PIRRA or NIRRA is important, as it informs distinct treatment and management approaches. This Review outlines the clinical differences between PIRRA and NIRRA, the genetic and epigenetic mechanisms and immune pathways that might contribute to the immunopathogenesis of recalcitrant synovitis in PIRRA, and a possible basis for non-inflammatory symptomatology in NIRRA. Future approaches towards the definition of refractory RA and the application of single-cell and integrated omics technologies to the identification of refractory RA endotypes are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. .,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. .,Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Stephen Eyre
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Dennis McGonagle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bergman MJ, Kivitz AJ, Pappas DA, Kremer JM, Zhang L, Jeter A, Withers JB. Clinical Utility and Cost Savings in Predicting Inadequate Response to Anti-TNF Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:775-792. [PMID: 32797404 PMCID: PMC7695768 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00226-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The PrismRA® test identifies rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies. This study evaluated the clinical and financial outcomes of incorporating PrismRA into routine clinical care of RA patients. METHODS A decision-analytic model was created to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes in the 12-month period following first biologic treatment. Two treatment strategies were compared: (1) observed clinical decision-making based on a 175-patient cohort receiving an anti-TNF therapy as their first biologic after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and (2) modeled clinical decision-making of the same population using PrismRA results to inform first-line biologic treatment choice. Modeled costs include biologic drug pharmacy, non-biologic pharmacy, and total medical costs. The odds of inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies and various components of patient care were calculated based on PrismRA results. RESULTS Identifying predicted inadequate responders to anti-TNF therapies resulted in a modeled 38% increase in ACR50 response to first-line biologic therapies. The fraction of patients who achieved an ACR50 response to any therapy (TNFi and others) within the 12-month period was 33% higher in the PrismRA-stratified population than in the unstratified population (59 vs. 44%, respectively). When therapy prescriptions were modeled according to PrismRA results, cost savings were modeled for all financial variables: overall costs (4% decreased total, 19% decreased on ineffective treatments), total biologic drug pharmacy (4% total, 23% ineffective), non-biologic pharmacy (2% total, 19% ineffective), and medical costs (6% total, 19% ineffective). Female sex was the clinical metric that showed the greatest association with inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.20, 4.88). CONCLUSIONS If PrismRA is implemented into routine clinical care as modeled, predicting which RA patients will have an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies could save > $7 million in overall ineffective healthcare costs per 1000 patients tested and increase targeted DMARD response rates in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan J Kivitz
- Department of Rheumatology, Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | - Dimitrios A Pappas
- Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA
- CORRONA, LCC, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Joel M Kremer
- The Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Lixia Zhang
- Scipher Medicine Corporation, 221 Crescent St., Suite 103A, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Anna Jeter
- Scipher Medicine Corporation, 221 Crescent St., Suite 103A, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Johanna B Withers
- Scipher Medicine Corporation, 221 Crescent St., Suite 103A, Waltham, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Plein S, Erhayiem B, Fent G, Horton S, Dumitru RB, Andrews J, Greenwood JP, Emery P, Hensor EM, Baxter P, Pavitt S, Buch MH. Cardiovascular effects of biological versus conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in treatment-naïve, early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 79:1414-1422. [PMID: 32859608 PMCID: PMC7569379 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) have cardiovascular disease (CVD) that is modifiable with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy, comparing first-line etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) with MTX strategy. METHODS Patients from a phase IV ERA trial randomised to ETN+MTX or MTX strategy±month 6 escalation to ETN+MTX, and with no CVD and maximum one traditional risk factor underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at baseline, years 1 and 2. Thirty matched controls underwent CMR. Primary outcome measure was aortic distensibility (AD) between controls and ERA, and baseline to year 1 AD change in ERA. Secondary analyses between and within ERA groups performed. Additional outcome measures included left ventricular (LV) mass and myocardial extracellular volume (ECV). RESULTS Eighty-one patients recruited. In ERA versus controls, respectively, baseline (geometric mean, 95% CI) AD was significantly lower (3.0×10-3 mm Hg-1 (2.7-3.3) vs 4.4×10-3 mm Hg-1 (3.7-5.2), p<0.001); LV mass significantly lower (78.2 g (74.0-82.7), n=81 vs 92.9 g (84.8-101.7), n=30, p<0.01); and ECV increased (27.1% (26.4-27.9), n=78 vs 24.9% (23.8-26.1), n=30, p<0.01). Across all patients, AD improved significantly from baseline to year 1 (3.0×10-3 mm Hg-1 (2.7-3.4) to 3.6×10-3 mm Hg-1 (3.1-4.1), respectively, p<0.01), maintained at year 2. The improvement in AD did not differ between the two treatment arms and disease activity state (Disease Activity Score with 28 joint count)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate-defined responders versus non-responders. CONCLUSION We report the first evidence of vascular and myocardial abnormalities in an ERA randomised controlled trial cohort and show improvement with DMARD therapy. The type of DMARD (first-line tumour necrosis factor-inhibitors or MTX) and clinical response to therapy did not affect CVD markers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN: ISRCTN89222125; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01295151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Plein
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Bara Erhayiem
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Graham Fent
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Horton
- Central Lancashire Moving Well Service, Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Raluca Bianca Dumitru
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jacqueline Andrews
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John P Greenwood
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ma Hensor
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Baxter
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue Pavitt
- Dental Translational and Clinical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Maya H Buch
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Erstlinientherapie mit Etanercept bei der Rheumatoiden Arthritis im
Frühstadium. AKTUEL RHEUMATOL 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1185-4948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Behandlungsvoraussetzung für biologische disease modifying drugs
(bDMARDs) bei der Rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA) ist üblicherweise das
Nichtansprechen auf konventionelle synthetische DMARDs wie Methotrexat.
Britische Forscher gingen im Rahmen einer pragmatischen randomisierten
Studie der Frage nach, ob Patienten im Frühstadium von einer
Erstlinientherapie aus Etanercept und Methotrexat stärker
profitieren als von einer Treat-to-Target-Strategie.
Collapse
|