Role of ultrasound for assessment of psoriatic arthritis patients with fibromyalgia

Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response

OBJECTIVE

To explore the registration of enthesitis among biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment across 12 European registries, compare the disease burden and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without enthesitis, and assess the enthesitis treatment response.

METHOD

Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs at first TNFi (TNFi-1) initiation (baseline) were assessed in patients with PsA, diagnosed by a rheumatologist, with versus without assessment of entheses and between those with versus without enthesitis. Enthesitis scores and resolution frequency were identified at follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 10 547 patients in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) Research Collaboration Network initiating TNFi, 1357 underwent evaluation for enthesitis. Eight registries included a validated scoring system for enthesitis. At baseline, 874 patients underwent entheses assessment [Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) 485 patients, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) 389 patients]. Enthesitis was detected by MASES in 170/485 (35%, mean score ± sd 3.1 ± 2.4) and by SPARCC in 236/389 (61%, 4 ± 3.4). Achilles enthesitis was most frequent, by both MASES (unilateral/bilateral 28%/9%) and SPARCC (48%/18%). MASES/SPARCC baseline and follow-up scores for TNFi-1 were available for 100/105 patients. Of these, 63 patients (63%) (MASES) and 46 (43.8%) (SPARCC) achieved resolution of enthesitis. The site-specific enthesitis resolution was overall lower at SPARCC sites (peripheral; 63-80%) than at MASES sites (mainly axial; 82-100%) following TNFi-1. Disease activity and PROs were worse in patients with versus without enthesitis.

CONCLUSION

Entheseal assessments are only registered in a minority of patients with PsA in routine care. When assessed, enthesitis was common, and a substantial proportion demonstrated resolution following treatment with TNFi-1.

Psoriasis and Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous condition characterized by several comorbidities, including musculoskeletal disorders. While the association with psoriatic arthritis has been widely addressed in literature, the aim of the present systematic review was to identify all available evidence on the relationship between psoriasis and fibromyalgia, a musculoskeletal syndrome primarily characterized by chronic widespread pain. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and MedLine and Web of Science (WOS) databases were searched for literature up to March 2023. After the removal of duplicate records, a total of 11 articles were deemed eligible for inclusion in a qualitative synthesis. Our results suggested that psoriatic patients had a higher prevalence of fibromyalgia (8-30%), with a very high impact on symptoms of psoriasis. Moreover, fibromyalgic patients had a slightly increased prevalence of psoriasis (2.2-6.7%) compared to the control groups. Finally, several studies demonstrated the substantial impact of fibromyalgia on psoriatic outcome measures in patients with concomitant psoriatic arthritis. In conclusion, available data support a potential interplay between psoriasis and fibromyalgia, but further research is encouraged in this area.

The association between sonographic enthesitis with sonographic synovitis and tenosynovitis in psoriatic arthritis patients

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between sonographic enthesitis with sonographic synovitis and tenosynovitis in PsA patients, and the association between sonographic enthesitis and clinical characteristics.

METHODS

Consecutive PsA patients that fulfilled the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) were prospectively recruited. Each patient was evaluated by comprehensive clinical and sonographic assessment (greyscale and Doppler), the latter including 52 joints, 40 tendons and 14 entheses [according to MAdrid Sonography Enthesitis Index (MASEI) plus lateral epicondyles] performed by an experienced sonographer blinded to the clinical data. The US enthesitis score was further categorized to inflammatory (hypoechogenicity, thickening, bursitis and Doppler) and structural (enthesophytes/calcifications and erosions) subcategories. Multivariate linear regression models assessed the association between enthesitis and the selected variables.

RESULTS

A total of 158 PsA patients [mean (s.d.) age 52.3 (13) years, 88 (55.7%) females] were analysed. Multivariate linear regression analyses showed a significant association between sonographic enthesitis and sonographic synovitis (β = 0.18, P = 0.008) and between sonographic enthesitis and sonographic tenosynovitis (β = 0.06, P = 0.02). These associations were derived from the enthesitis inflammatory subcategory of the MASEI (P < 0.05). Associations between enthesitis and synovitis were also demonstrated on the level of the elbow, knee and ankle joints (P < 0.05). In addition, sonographic enthesitis was significantly associated with older age, male sex, swollen joint count, CRP level and physical occupation.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic enthesitis is associated with sonographic synovitis and tenosynovitis. The severity of sonographic enthesitis may represent a marker for inflammatory activity in other musculoskeletal domains.

Utility of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Psoriatic Arthritis

PURPOSE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes a variety of musculoskeletal abnormalities. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in PsA is becoming increasingly popular, both in clinical practice and research. This narrative reviews recent literature on the utility of ultrasound in PsA.

METHODS

A search of PubMed was used to identify publications written in English, with titles containing the term psoriatic arthritis and either ultrasound, ultrasonography, or sonographic. A total of 178 publications were identified; those that were not relevant (n = 59), were not original research (n = 45), or that had small (<30) sample sizes (n = 34) were excluded, leaving 40 studies for review of the use of ultrasound in various aspects of PsA. Publications with similar findings were grouped into seven domains: (1) the use of ultrasound findings compared to clinical assessment; (2) the use of ultrasound in the assessment of enthesitis; (3) the use of ultrasound in the assessment of nails; (4) the use of ultrasound as a screening tool in patients with psoriasis at risk for PsA; (5) the use of ultrasound in differentiating PsA from other similar conditions; (6) the use of ultrasound as a measure of disease activity; and (7) the use of ultrasound compared to MRI.

FINDINGS

In recent studies, ultrasound measures of inflammation tended to agree with objective clinical findings of disease, such as swollen joint counts, while being less influenced by subjective measures, such as pain. Ultrasound has utility in the assessment of enthesitis and psoriatic nail disease in PsA, and as an overall measure of disease activity. Ultrasound-based outcomes measures have been used in observational studies and in clinical trials involving PsA, and may have utility as a measure of treatment response. The findings from recent studies suggest that ultrasound may have utility in improving the accuracy and precision of screening programs designed to identify subclinical PsA in cohorts of patients with psoriasis; however, cost-efficacy remains to be determined. Beyond screening, ultrasound may have utility in the diagnosis of PsA in patients with suspected inflammatory arthritis, and ultrasound measures of inflammation agree with MRI measures of inflammation, meaning that incorporating ultrasound into clinical practice might help to overcome the barriers associated with MRI.

IMPLICATIONS

As ultrasound technology continues to advance, and associated costs decrease, it is likely that ultrasound will become more integrated into the clinical journeys of patients with PsA.

Sex-Based Differences in Sonographic and Clinical Findings Among Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate sex-based sonographic differences in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

The study population included consecutive prospectively recruited patients with PsA, as determined by the CASPAR (Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis) criteria, who underwent clinical and physical examinations, followed by a detailed ultrasound (US) evaluation (greyscale and Doppler). US evaluation included 52 joints, 40 tendons, and 14 points of entheses (Modified Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index [MASEI] plus lateral epicondyles) performed by an experienced sonographer blinded to the clinical data. The US score was based on the summation of a semiquantitative score for synovitis, tenosynovitis, and enthesitis. The US enthesitis score was categorized into inflammatory lesions (ie, hypoechogenicity, thickening, bursitis, and Doppler) and structural lesions (ie, enthesophytes/calcifications and erosions).

RESULTS

The study population of 158 patients included 70 males and 88 females. The males had higher rates of employment (P = 0.01), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores (P = 0.04), and mean swollen joint counts (P = 0.04). The total US score and its subcategory scores-the synovitis and tenosynovitis scores-were similar for both sexes, whereas the total enthesitis score and its subcategory score-the inflammatory enthesitis score-were significantly higher for the males compared to the females (P = 0.01 and P = 0.005, respectively). Hypoechogenicity, thickening, and enthesophytes were more prevalent in males compared to females (P < 0.05). Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models showed that male sex was associated with a higher US inflammatory enthesitis score compared to female sex (odds ratio 1.96, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Sonographic enthesitis was more prevalent in males compared to females with PsA. These differences were not reflected by enthesitis disease activity scores derived from clinical assessment.

Ultrasound Enthesitis in Psoriasis Patients with or without Psoriatic Arthritis, a Cross-Sectional Analysis

Background and objectives: The main objective of the current study was to describe the prevalence of enthesitis at different sites in a group of patients with psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Materials and Methods: The study included adult patients with psoriasis who underwent clinical examination, laboratory tests and ultrasound examination of the entheses. The enthesitis ultrasound scores (BUSES, MASEI, GUESS) were evaluated; the presence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis was also recorded for each scan site. Results: The study included 16 (57.1%) patients with PsA and 12 (42.9%) patients with psoriasis, with an increased average body mass index (29.3 kg/m2). Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a higher prevalence of nail psoriasis (68.8% compared to 33.3%; p = 0.063). There were no significant differences regarding the clinical examination of entheses between patients with psoriasis and patients with PsA (p = 0.459). Ultrasound scores, BUSES, GUESS and MASEI proved to have statistically significant higher median values in PsA patients compared to psoriasis patients. Compared to psoriasis patients, PsA patients had a significantly higher prevalence of OMERACT-defined enthesitis of the quadriceps tendon and inferior patellar ligament (both 81.3% compared to 25.0%, p = 0.003). Clinical examination of the lateral epicondyle and of the superior patellar ligament was consistent with their ultrasound examination (κ = 0.357, p = 0.043, respectively, κ = 0.404, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Clinical enthesitis scores do not differ between psoriasis and PsA patients. All analyzed ultrasound scores are significantly higher in patients with PsA. OMERACT-defined enthesitis has the ability to discriminate sonographic enthesitis between the two subgroups for bilateral quadriceps and inferior patellar tendon enthesitis. Bilateral ultrasound damage of entheses can suggest a PsA diagnosis.

[Are SARS-CoV-2 reactive T cells detectable and potentially protective in patients under anti-CD20 treatment with an impaired humoral response?]

The pandemic attributable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has greatly changed life in most countries of the world for more than 1.5 years now. The spread could be more or less well-controlled and fatalities could partly be avoided by obligatory wearing of masks, contact restrictions and since the beginning of the year by vaccinations. Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and organ transplant patients under immunosuppression, are somewhat more at risk to become ill with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The probability and severity of an infection depends on the ability of the humoral and cellular immune systems to effectively combat the virus. This can be substantially improved by vaccination. The B cell depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) is frequently employed in rheumatic diseases, whereby antibody formation against the new pathogen within the framework of vaccination is restricted. Recent study results in patients treated with RTX indicate that an effective cellular immune response can be developed despite the impaired humoral response.

Local and systemic reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were launched in December 2020. Vaccination of patients with rheumatic diseases is recommended, as they are considered at higher risk of severe COVID-19 than the general population. Patients with rheumatic disease have largely been excluded from vaccine phase 3 trials. This study explores the safety and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 among patients with rheumatic diseases. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), median age 58.8 years, 285 subjects in total, were vaccinated twice with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech). Questionnaires on reactogenicity matching the original phase 3 study were answered seven days after completed vaccination. The majority of SLE and RA patients experienced either local (78.0%) or systemic reactions (80.1%). Only 1.8% experienced a grade-4 reaction. Compared to the original study, we found more frequent fatigue [Odds ratio (OR) 2.2 (1.7-2.8)], headache [OR 1.7 (1.3-2.2)], muscle pain [OR 1.8 (1.4-2.3)], and joint pain [OR 2.3 (1.7-3.0)] in patients. In contrast, the use of antipyretics was less frequent [OR 0.5 (0.3-0.6)]. Patients with SLE and RA experience reactogenicity to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. Reactogenicity was more frequent in patients, however, not more severe compared with healthy controls.

Managing ANCA-associated vasculitis during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an online survey

Management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) during the COVID-19 pandemic poses unique therapeutic challenges. An online survey was conducted to understand physician’s choices for treating AAV during the COVID-19 pandemic. Web-based survey featuring nineteen questions was circulated amongst physicians across various specialties. The responses regarding immunosuppressive therapy for remission induction and maintenance, COVID-19 testing, and preventive measures were recorded. A total of 304 responses were recorded. Most of the respondents were from India (83.9%) and comprised rheumatologists (66%) in practice for ≥ 5 years (71%). Though a majority preferred Rituximab or intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) as a remission induction agent, a significant proportion opted for oral CYC and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) also. Only one-third wanted to test for COVID-19 before initiating immunosuppressive therapy in patients with organ/life-threatening manifestations. Rituximab was the most favored maintenance therapy (47%), followed by azathioprine, MMF, and methotrexate. The results of this focused survey of managing AAV patients depict the real-world dilemmas and physicians’ choices in this setting.