1
|
Nash P, Kerschbaumer A, Konzett V, Aletaha D, Dörner T, Fleischmann R, McInnes I, Primdahl J, Sattar N, Tanaka Y, Trauner M, Winthrop K, de Wit M, Askling J, Baraliakos X, Boehncke WH, Emery P, Gossec L, Isaacs JD, Krauth M, Lee EB, Maksymowych W, Pope J, Scholte-Voshaar M, Schreiber K, Schreiber S, Stamm T, Taylor PC, Takeuchi T, Tam LS, Van den Bosch F, Westhovens R, Zeitlinger M, Smolen JS. Expert consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: 2024 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2025:S0003-4967(25)00181-5. [PMID: 40037995 DOI: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Revised: 11/30/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2025]
Abstract
In light of the introduction of new Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), new indications for JAKi and recent safety considerations that have arisen since the preceding consensus statement on JAKi therapy, a multidisciplinary taskforce was assembled, encompassing patients, health care professionals, and clinicians with expertise in JAKi therapy across specialties. This taskforce, informed by two comprehensive systematic literature reviews, undertook the objective to update the previous expert consensus for using JAKi developed in 2019. The taskforce deliberated on overarching principles, indications, dosage and comedication strategies, warnings and contraindications, screening protocols, monitoring recommendations, and adverse effect profiles. The methodology was based on the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology standard operating procedures, with voting on these important elements. Furthermore, an updated research agenda was proposed. The task force did not address when a JAKi should be prescribed but rather considerations once this decision has been made. This update aimed to equip clinicians with the necessary knowledge and guidance for the efficient and safe administration of this expanding and significant class of drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Nash
- Griffith University School of Medicine, Nathan, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Victoria Konzett
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Dörner
- Department of Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roy Fleischmann
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Iain McInnes
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jette Primdahl
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Naveed Sattar
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kevin Winthrop
- Division of Infectious Diseases and School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Medical Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johan Askling
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Wolf-Henning Boehncke
- Division of Dermatology and Venereology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Pathology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paul Emery
- Leeds NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, LTHT, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Laure Gossec
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris France, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Paris, France
| | - John D Isaacs
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre and Musculoskeletal Unit, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Maria Krauth
- Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eun Bong Lee
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Walter Maksymowych
- Medicine, University of Alberta Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Janet Pope
- Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Karen Schreiber
- Danish Centre for Expertise in Rheumatology (CeViG), Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Sønderborg, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research (IRS), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Tanja Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, and Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Lai-Shan Tam
- Rheumatology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong Shaw College, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Filip Van den Bosch
- VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Ghent University Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rene Westhovens
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Konzett V, Smolen JS, Nash P, Winthrop K, Aletaha D, Dörner T, Fleischmann R, Tanaka Y, Primdahl J, Baraliakos X, McInnes IB, Trauner M, Sattar N, de Wit M, Schoones JW, Kerschbaumer A. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-a systematic literature review informing the 2024 update of an international expert consensus statement. Ann Rheum Dis 2025:S0003-4967(25)00080-9. [PMID: 39934016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2024] [Revised: 11/19/2024] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic literature review (SLR) on safety outcomes was performed to inform the 2024 update of the expert consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). METHODS An update of the 2019 SLR was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. For safety, randomised, placebo-controlled or active-controlled trials on all JAKi investigated in IMIDs, long-term extension (LTE) studies, pooled trial data analyses, and cohort and claims studies were included. RESULTS We screened 13,905 records, of which 209 were finally included. Three safety trials and 13 post hoc analyses, 83 efficacy randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with adequate safety reporting, 56 integrated safety analyses and LTE of RCTs, 20 additional conference abstracts on RCT data, as well as 37 real-world cohort studies were presented to the task force. Safety profiles of JAKi were overall consistent across compounds and indications, but impacts of patient profiles, treatment dosing, and other cofactors like background medications on drug safety could be observed. Furthermore, differential effects of variously selective JAKi on distinct adverse events of special interest (AESI) and laboratory outcomes were discerned. CONCLUSION A substantial amount of literature was published on JAKi safety since 2019. A comprehensive overview of these data supports the optimal use of JAKi in patients with IMIDs, by consideration and balance of their benefits as well as risks in every patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Konzett
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Josef S Smolen
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Nash
- Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Dörner
- Rheumatology, Charite Medical Faculty Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Roy Fleischmann
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Jette Primdahl
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
| | | | - Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Michael Trauner
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Naveed Sattar
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Maarten de Wit
- Stichting Tools, Patient Research Partner, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan W Schoones
- Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Department of Medicine III, Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ishiguro N, Tanaka Y, Matsubara T, Atsumi T, Amano K, Sugiyama E, Yamaoka K, Winthrop K, Kivitz A, Burmester GR, Gottenberg JE, Genovese MC, Matzkies F, Guo Y, Jiang D, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Kondo A, Besuyen R, Takeuchi T. Integrated safety analysis of filgotinib treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in patients from Japan over a median of 1.5 years. Mod Rheumatol 2023; 33:64-72. [PMID: 35365828 DOI: 10.1093/mr/roac020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Characterize safety of the Janus kinase-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) in Japanese patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Data from three Phase 3 trials (NCT02889796, NCT02873936, and NCT02886728) and a long-term extension (NCT03025308) through September 2019 were integrated; patients received ≥1 dose of FIL 200 (FIL200) or 100 mg (FIL100) daily, or placebo (PBO). We calculated exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years FIL exposure (100PYE) for treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse events of special interest. RESULTS Among 3691 total patients and 6080.7 PYE, 229 Japanese patients received FIL for 311.4 PYE (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years). During the 12-week PBO-controlled period, serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to study drug disruption were comparable between FIL and PBO. Serious infection rates were 1.9%, 0%, and 2% for FIL200, FIL100, and PBO during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.8 and 2.1/100PYE. No herpes zoster (HZ) or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurred during the PBO-controlled period; long-term FIL200 and FIL100 EAIRs were 3.0 and 2.1/100PYE (HZ) and 0.6 and 0/100PYE (MACE). CONCLUSION Long-term FIL treatment (median 1.5, maximum 2.5 years exposure) was well tolerated at 100- and 200-mg doses in Japanese patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- The First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Matsubara
- Department of Orthopedics, Matsubara Mayflower Hospital, Katō, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Atsumi
- Department of Rheumatology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koichi Amano
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Japan
| | - Eiji Sugiyama
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kunihiro Yamaoka
- Department of Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Kevin Winthrop
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ying Guo
- Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sandborn WJ, D'Haens GR, Sands BE, Panaccione R, Ng SC, Lawendy N, Kulisek N, Modesto I, Guo X, Mundayat R, Su C, Vranic I, Panés J. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: an integrated summary of up to 7.8 years of safety data from the global clinical program. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 17:338-351. [PMID: 36124702 PMCID: PMC10069618 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Tofacitinib is an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. We report an integrated summary of tofacitinib safety [exposure:≤7.8 years] from the global clinical program. METHODS Patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) from completed phase [P]2/3 placebo-controlled studies, open-label, long-term extension study [final data cut-off: August 24, 2020], and interim analysis of a P3b/4 study [interim data cut-off: February 20, 2020; Overall plus P3b/4 (2020) Cohort], were included. Proportions with adverse events [AEs] and serious AEs, and incidence rates [IRs; unique patients with events/100 patient-years] for deaths and AEs of special interest [AESI] were evaluated. Opportunistic infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], and gastrointestinal perforations were adjudicated. RESULTS In total, 1157 patients received ≥1 dose of tofacitinib (mean duration: 946.9 days); 955/1157 [83%] received a predominant dose of 10 mg BID; 412/1157 [35.6%] received tofacitinib for >4 years; 992/1157 [85.7%] had AEs, 244/1157 [21.1%] had serious AEs, and 134/1157 (11.6%) discontinued due to AEs. IRs [95% CIs] for all tofacitinib doses: deaths, 0.23 [0.09-0.46]; serious infections, 1.69 [1.26-2.21]; herpes zoster [non-serious and serious], 3.30 [2.67-4.04]; opportunistic infections, 1.03 [0.70-1.46]; malignancies [excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC)], 0.84 [0.55-1.24]; NMSC, 0.73 [0.45-1.10]; MACE, 0.29 [0.13-0.55]; deep vein thrombosis, 0.03 [0.00-0.18]; pulmonary embolism, 0.19 [0.07-0.42]; gastrointestinal perforations, 0.10 [0.02-0.28]. CONCLUSIONS AESI IRs were stable to 7.8 years and generally <2.0 in the Overall plus P3b/4 (2020) Cohort, with the exception of herpes zoster [a known risk of tofacitinib treatment].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Geert R D'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bruce E Sands
- Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Siew C Ng
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, LKS Institute of Health Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julian Panés
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winthrop KL, Vermeire S, Long MD, Panés J, Ng SC, Kulisek N, Mundayat R, Lawendy N, Vranic I, Modesto I, Su C, Melmed GY. Long-term Risk of Herpes Zoster Infection in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Receiving Tofacitinib. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2022; 29:85-96. [PMID: 35648151 PMCID: PMC9825290 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). We report herpes zoster (HZ) incidence and risk factors in the tofacitinib UC clinical program (up to 7.8 years). METHODS Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; unique patients with events/100 patient-years) of HZ were evaluated in 4 cohorts: Induction (phase 2 and 3 induction study data), Maintenance (phase 3 maintenance study data), Overall (data from all phase 2, 3, and open-label, long-term extension studies), and Overall plus interim 6-month phase 3b and 4 data. Herpes zoster risk factors were assessed by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS In the Induction and Maintenance Cohorts, IRs for HZ (nonserious and serious) were numerically higher with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) vs placebo and tofacitinib 10 vs 5 mg BID, respectively. With all tofacitinib doses (5 or 10 mg BID), IRs (95% confidence intervals) for HZ in the Overall and Overall plus phase 3b/4 Cohorts (total exposure, 2814.4 and 2999.7 patient-years, respectively) were 3.38 (2.73-4.15) and 3.30 (2.67-4.04), respectively. In the Overall plus phase 3b/4 Cohort, >90% of HZ were nonserious; >90% were mild/moderate; >90% resolved without discontinuing tofacitinib; 0.6% of patients had multiple HZ events. Herpes zoster IRs were stable when analyzed by 6-month intervals up to >30 months. Herpes zoster risk factors included older age, lower weight, geographic region, and prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) failure. CONCLUSIONS Most HZ events were mild/moderate. Herpes zoster IRs remained stable over 7.8 years of exposure. Older age, lower weight, geographic region, and prior TNFi failure were associated with increased HZ risk. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NCT00787202;NCT01465763;NCT01458951;NCT01458574;NCT01470612;NCT03281304.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Winthrop
- Address correspondence to: Kevin L. Winthrop, MD, MPH; Professor of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Ophthalmology, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA()
| | - Séverine Vermeire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Millie D Long
- University of North Carolina, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Julian Panés
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Siew C Ng
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, LKS Institute of Health Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Chinyu Su
- Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gil Y Melmed
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Venetsanopoulou AI, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Janus kinase versus TNF inhibitors: where we stand today in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 18:485-493. [PMID: 35535405 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2064275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent decades, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment landscape has evolved with the induction of new biological and targeted therapies that provide significant therapeutic benefits in patients with sustained disease. AREAS COVERED Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were the first biologics used in the treatment of RA. Although they present a significant efficacy, an insufficient response of some patients led to further research and discovery of targeted therapies, such as Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), which act at a molecular level, regulating many cytokines. Clinical benefits have been seen with both TNFi and JAKi as monotherapy and combined with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Still, some significant side effects have been reported with JAKi, and several questions remain about their safety and selectivity in action. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the mechanism of action, the clinical efficacy, and safety of TNFi vs. JAKi. EXPERT OPINION TNFi and JAKi are particularly useful in treating inflammatory arthropathies. Both drug categories are recommended by ACR and EULAR institutions in RA patients suffering from moderate to severe disease. Safety data in long-term studies are required to determine the optimal benefit to the risk profile of JAKi use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliki I Venetsanopoulou
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Paraskevi V Voulgari
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Alexandros A Drosos
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Winthrop KL, Nash P, Yamaoka K, Mysler E, Khan N, Camp HS, Song Y, Suboticki JL, Curtis JR. Incidence and risk factors for herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving upadacitinib: a pooled analysis of six phase III clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2022; 81:206-213. [PMID: 34615638 PMCID: PMC8761994 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upadacitinib (UPA) is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors have been associated with an increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ) in patients with RA. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for HZ in UPA-treated patients with RA from the UPA phase III clinical trial programme. METHODS Exposure-adjusted incidence/event rates for HZ were determined in patients receiving UPA (monotherapy or combination therapy) in six randomised phase III trials (data cut-off on 30 June 2020). HZ incidence and event rates were also determined in patients receiving methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy or adalimumab (ADA) + MTX. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify HZ risk factors in UPA-treated patients. RESULTS A total of 5306 patients were included in this analysis. The incidence rate of HZ/100 patient-years (95% CI) was 0.8 (0.3 to 1.9), 1.1 (0.5 to 1.9), 3.0 (2.6 to 3.5) and 5.3 (4.5 to 6.2), in the MTX monotherapy, ADA + MTX, UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg groups, respectively. The majority of HZ cases with UPA (71%) involved a single dermatome. Prior history of HZ and Asian region were HZ risk factors in UPA-treated patients. CONCLUSION In the UPA phase III RA clinical programme, HZ incidence and event rates were higher with UPA versus ADA + MTX or MTX monotherapy, and higher with the 30 mg versus 15 mg dose. Patients from Asia and those with a history of HZ may be at increased risk of HZ while receiving UPA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin L Winthrop
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Peter Nash
- Griffith University, School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kunihiro Yamaoka
- Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Eduardo Mysler
- Rheumatology, Organización Medica de Investigación, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Nasser Khan
- Immunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Heidi S Camp
- Immunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Yanna Song
- Immunology, AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|