Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in England and Wales, 1981-2

The worldwide incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of epidemiological studies

Objectives

The aim was to review the worldwide incidence and prevalence of SLE and variation with age, sex, ethnicity and time.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE search engines was carried out using Medical Subject Headings and keyword search terms for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus combined with incidence, prevalence and epidemiology in August 2013 and updated in September 2016. Author, journal, year of publication, country, region, case-finding method, study period, number of incident or prevalent cases, incidence (per 100 000 person-years) or prevalence (per 100 000 persons) and age, sex or ethnic group-specific incidence or prevalence were collected.

Results

The highest estimates of incidence and prevalence of SLE were in North America [23.2/100 000 person-years (95% CI: 23.4, 24.0) and 241/100 000 people (95% CI: 130, 352), respectively]. The lowest incidences of SLE were reported in Africa and Ukraine (0.3/100 000 person-years), and the lowest prevalence was in Northern Australia (0 cases in a sample of 847 people). Women were more frequently affected than men for every age and ethnic group. Incidence peaked in middle adulthood and occurred later for men. People of Black ethnicity had the highest incidence and prevalence of SLE, whereas those with White ethnicity had the lowest incidence and prevalence. There appeared to be an increasing trend of SLE prevalence with time.

Conclusion

There are worldwide differences in the incidence and prevalence of SLE that vary with sex, age, ethnicity and time. Further study of genetic and environmental risk factors may explain the reasons for these differences. More epidemiological studies in Africa are warranted.

Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease distributed worldwide, which occurs in both genders, and across racial/ethnic and age groups; however, higher rates are observed in adults, in women and in non-Caucasians. Genetic, environmental, sociodemographic and methodological issues are responsible not only for these differences but for the variable course and outcome of the disease. Non-Caucasians have a more severe disease with a higher risk for early mortality and damage accrual. Males also have a more severe disease; however, a negative impact of male gender on lupus outcomes has not been firmly established. Childhood-onset is associated with a more severe disease; moreover, it is also associated with higher damage and diminished survival; finally, late-onset lupus is mild but it is associated with higher damage accrual and a diminished survival. Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the incidence and prevalence of SLE, the impact of age, gender and race/ethnicity in SLE and in the survival of those affected. Expert commentary: Age, gender and race/ethnicity impact disease expression in SLE patients; despite improvements in survival, mortality in SLE remains almost three times higher than in the general population.

The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in the UK, 1999-2012

Objectives

To estimate the incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the UK over the period 1999–2012.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The incidence was calculated per 100 000 person-years and the prevalence was calculated per 100 000 people for the period 1999–2012 and stratified by year, age group, gender, region and ethnicity. Three definitions of SLE were explored: (1) systemic lupus, (2) a fully comprehensive definition of lupus including cutaneous only lupus and (3) requiring supporting evidence of SLE in the medical record.

Results

Using our primary definition of SLE, the incidence during the study period was 4.91/100 000 person-years (95% CI 4.73 to 5.09), with an annual 1.8% decline (p<0.001). In contrast, the prevalence increased from 64.99/100 000 in 1999 (95% CI 62.04 to 67.93) (0.065%) to 97.04/100 000 in 2012 (95% CI 94.18 to 99.90) (0.097%). SLE was six times more common in women. The peak age of incidence was 50–59 years. There was regional variation in both incidence and prevalence. People of Black Caribbean ethnicity had the highest incidence and prevalence. Alternative definitions of SLE increased (definition 2) or decreased (definition 3) estimates of incidence and prevalence, but similar trends were found.

Conclusions

The incidence of SLE has been declining but the prevalence has been increasing in the UK in recent years. Age, gender, region and ethnicity are risk factors for SLE. This is the first study to report ethnic differences on the incidence and prevalence of SLE using the CPRD.

Autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial disorder with multigenic inheritance and various environmental factors implicated in its aetiopathogenesis. Despite the multiple mechanisms involved in the aetiology of SLE being elusive, recent studies have made progress in our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms via abnormal regulation of cell-mediated and humoral immunity that lead to tissue damage. The heterogeneity of the clinical manifestations probably reflects the complexity of the disease pathogenesis itself. The immune system in SLE is characterised by a complex interplay between overactive B cells, abnormally activated T cells and antigen-presenting cells. This interplay leads to the production of an array of inflammatory cytokines, apoptotic cells, diverse autoantibodies and immune complexes that in turn activate effector cells and the complement system, leading to tissue injury and damage which are the hallmarks of the clinical manifestations. SLE patients have dysregulation of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and immune response-related genes, as well as of the genes involved in apoptosis, signal transduction and the cell cycle.

Understanding the epidemiology and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

This review examines the burden and patterns of disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the influence and interactions of gender, ethnicity, age, and psychosocial attributes with respect to disease progression, focusing on issues relevant to clinical practice and research.

METHODS

PubMed literature search complemented by review of bibliographies listed in identified articles.

RESULTS

An increased risk among reproductive age women is clearly seen in African Americans in the United States. However, in other populations, a different pattern is generally seen, with the highest age-specific incidence rates occurring in women after age 40 years. The disease is 2 to 4 times more frequent, and more severe, among nonwhite populations around the world and tends to be more severe in men and in pediatric and late-onset lupus. SLE patients now experience a higher than 90% survival rate at 5 years. The less favorable survival experience of ethnic minorities is possibly related to socioeconomic status rather than to ethnicity per se, and adequate social support has been shown to be a protective factor, in general, in SLE patients. Discordance between physician and patient ratings of disease activity may affect quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our understanding of ways to improve outcomes in SLE patients could benefit from patient-oriented research focusing on many dimensions of disease burden. Promising research initiatives include the inclusion of community-based patients in longitudinal studies, use of self-assessment tools for rating disease damage and activity, and a focus on self-perceived disease activity and treatment compliance.

Indications for plasma exchange in systemic lupus erythematosus in 2005

Plasma exchange can remove putative pathogenic autoantibodies and circulating immune complexes from the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, their efficacy has only been supported by noncontrolled and/or retrospective studies. Nonetheless, PE may still be of relevance in some selected SLE patients and as adjunctive therapy, in combination with corticosteroids (CS) and other immunosuppressant(s). We review herein the principal historical steps of the use of plasma exchange to treat SLE, based upon the main trials and case reports that have highlighted its most pertinent indications. Acute life-threatening manifestations and severe therapy-resistant manifestations, like refractory SLE renal disease, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, neuropsychiatric SLE, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome, hyperviscosity syndrome and cryoglobulinemia, are the indications for which plasma exchange might have a beneficial therapeutic role. Although few SLE patients undergo plasma exchange each year nowadays (10-20 per year in France), adverse events are very rare and recent advances in plasma exchange technologies, like immunoadsorption, might, in the future, counterbalance their cost and broaden their place in the therapeutic armamentarium for SLE.

Autoimmune mechanisms in children with systemic lupus erythematosus

Although the pathogenesis of SLE remains poorly understood, there is consensus that it involves a combination of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. New technologies applied to genomic and gene expression studies have revealed novel gene mutations and cytokine alterations in this disease. Recently, advances in monoclonal antibodies and recombinant DNA technology have resulted in the development of new drugs to arrest disease progression and restore physiologic immune responses without major side effects. Clinical trials to test several of these novel therapies are currently underway.

Lupus eritematoso sistémico pediátrico

Pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE) is a chronic mutisystemic autoimmune disease with complex clinical manifestations. Although the presentation, clinical manifestations, immunological findings and treatment issues of pSLE are similar to those of adult SLE patients, there are special issues which need to be considered when dealing with SLE in children. During the last decade survival has improved remarkably as a result of earlier diagnosis, recognition of milder disease and better approaches to therapy. However, pSLE remains a potentially serious condition. Although the pathogenesis of SLE remains poorly understood, susceptibility involves a combination of environmental, hormonal and genetic factors. Better understanding of SLE pathogenesis will hopefully lead to more specific and less toxic therapies for this disease.

Update on pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the clinical manifestations of SLE in children. Emerging clues on the pathogenesis of the disease based on recent human studies conducted both in children and adults, will also be summarized.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric Rheumatologists caring for children with SLE face many challenges. As the life expectancy of these patients improves, new recognized complications such as accelerated atherosclerosis and hypertension emerge as major causes of morbidity. However, few longitudinal studies describing the long term outcome of these children, including the impact of disease and treatment on their physical and psychological development are available. Few prospective interventional studies have been carried out to assess the efficacy of established and novel treatments in the pediatric population. Recently, basic studies aimed at understanding the immune alterations underlying this disease have been performed in children. These studies indicate an important role for interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in the pathogenesis of this disease and reveal an overall striking homogeneity of leukocyte gene expression profiles in children and adults with SLE. The contribution of novel gene polymorphisms to disease susceptibility and the sequential breakdown of tolerance to nuclear antigens that precedes clinical manifestations in patients with SLE are among the recent studies that are helping us understand the complex SLE puzzle.

SUMMARY

SLE continues to cause significant morbidity in the pediatric age group. A better recognition of the age-specific manifestations and long-term complications of this disease is required to improve its outcome. Understanding its unique pathogenesis will hopefully lead to the development of better, more targeted and less toxic therapies.

The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the most diverse of the autoimmune diseases because it may affect any organ of the body and display a broad spectrum of clinical and immunological manifestations. Although previously considered a rare disease, SLE now appears to be relatively common in certain groups of the population. This is probably due to the development of several immunological tests that have allowed the description of many atypical or benign cases that otherwise might not be diagnosed. Furthermore, with the introduction since 1982 of a set of more sensitive criteria for SLE classification, more cases can nowadays be detected. In the present article, we review the most important data regarding the incidence and prevalence of this disease in the general population, the epidemiologic information on the patterns of disease expression in specific subsets and the studies on mortality in SLE. An important amount of information comes from the data obtained from the "Euro-Lupus Cohort," a series of 1000 patients with SLE from several European countries that have been followed prospectively since 1991.

Systemic lupus erythematosus in India

The first case of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was reported from India in 1995 followed by two more case reports and further, a series of eight cases, till 1969. Since the establishment of a clinical immunology laboratory at a major teaching institution in New Delhi in 1968, SLE was extensively studied and reported from that centre. From mid-1980 onwards several other centres in different regions in India including Chennai (old name Madras), Mumbai (old name Bombay), Calcutta and Hydrabad, also published their regional experience on SLE. Based on these data, the present report describes the clinical and laboratory characteristics of 1366 SLE patients seen in different regions of India. Arthritis, rash, photosensitivity, seizures and psychosis were seen in comparable proportions to other racial groups. Similarly, ANA and anti-DNA antibody positivity was also within the range seen in other racial groups. When compared with other series, however, alopecia, renal lupus, oral ulcers and neurological involvement was seen in higher proportions, reaching statistically significant figures in comparison to some racial groups. In contrast, haematological manifestations were seen in significantly less proportions in comparison to some of the racial groups. Serositis and discoid lesions were also seen in lower proportions than in most of other races. The proportion of those with anti-Sm antibodies was in between two extremes of highest among Africans and Israelis and lowest among Chinese and Europeans. Other manifestations were comparable to most other racial groups. Compared to North American and European reports, significantly low 5 and 10 year survival was observed among patients from India. This could be related to the general public health situation in the country including less than optimal management facilities in hospitals, delay in diagnosis due to lack of awareness of the disease, referral bias where only serious patients reach major city hospitals, or a truly severe disease among Indians, or a combination of these genetic, environmental and/or sociocultural factors. The Main causes of death were irreversible renal damage, infections and neurological involvement. Despite a comparable prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulants (LAC), clinical antiphospholipid syndrome was significantly less common. Genetic studies showed appreciable increase of HLA DR4 (37.5%) among patients compared with controls (18%). Additionally the haplotype B8-DR3 was encountered frequently in the patient group.

Epidemiology and estimated population burden of selected autoimmune diseases in the United States

Autoimmune diseases cause significant and chronic morbidity and disability. The actual number of persons in the United States that are affected by autoimmune diseases and the resultant magnitude of their impact on the public's health are limited to a few specific diseases. In order to understand the clinical, public health and economic importance of these diseases it is necessary to have estimates of incidence and prevalence rates in the population. In this analysis, we estimate the number of persons affected by 24 autoimmune diseases in the United States by applying mean weighted prevalence and incidence rates obtained from published articles to U. S. Census data. The study was restricted to 24 autoimmune predefined diseases for which there was direct or indirect evidence for autoimmune pathogenesis. Subsequently, we used computerized search software and ancestry searching (bibliographies) to conduct a comprehensive search of articles published from 1965 to the present. Eligible studies included those which adhered to standard disease definitions and which included population-based estimates of incidence or prevalence rates. Mean weighted incidence and prevalence rates were calculated from eligible published studies with greater weight proportionately given to larger studies. The mean rates were then applied to the U.S. Census population figures to estimate the number of persons currently afflicted with each disease and the number of new cases occurring each year in the United States. Only U.S. and European studies were used to estimate prevalence and incidence rates when there were at least six eligible studies available for a disease. When there were fewer than six studies, all available studies were included, regardless of country of origin. The number of eligible incidence and prevalence studies found in the literature varied considerably between the 24 autoimmune diseases selected. The largest number of eligible prevalence studies were conducted on multiple sclerosis (MS), rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (>/=23), followed by insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM), myasthenia gravis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and scleroderma (>/=7). There were only one to four eligible studies done on 11 other diseases, and no prevalence studies on 6 diseases. Incidence studies were less frequent but the largest number of studies were conducted on IDDM (n = 37) and MS (n = 28), followed by Graves' disease/hyperthyroidism, glomerulonephritis, primary biliary cirrhosis, rheumatic fever, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma, and SLE (>/=9). On the other 11 diseases, there were one to six eligible studies, and no studies on 5 diseases. There were no eligible incidence or prevalence studies on Goodpasture's syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, or relapsing polychondritis. Overall we estimate that 8,511,845 persons in the United States or approximately 1 in 31 Americans are currently afflicted with one of these autoimmune diseases. The diseases with the highest prevalence rates were Graves'/hyperthyroidism, IDDM, pernicious anemia, rheumatoid arthritis, thyroiditis, and vitiligo, comprising an estimated 7,939, 280 people or 93% of the total number estimated. Glomerulonephritis, MS, and SLE added an estimated 323,232 people. The prevalence of the other diseases reviewed were rare, less than 5.14/100,000. Most diseases were more common in women. From the incidence data we estimate that 237,203 Americans will develop an autoimmune disease in 1996 and that approximately 1,186,015 new cases of these autoimmune diseases occur in the United States every 5 years. Women were at 2.7 times greater risk than men to acquire an autoimmune disease. After reviewing the medical literature for incidence and prevalence rates of 24 autoimmune diseases, we conclude that many autoimmune diseases are infrequently studied by epidemiologists. As a result the total burden of disease may be an underestimate. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Special report: adjusted lupus prevalence. Results of a marketing study by the Lupus Foundation of America

There are many estimates of the prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus. These range from a high of 1:245 to 1:1000 from numerous worldwide epidemiologic studies. In a departure from scientific procedure the Lupus Foundation of America recently completed an inexpensive marketing study which produced three findings. Firstly, that lupus awareness in the USA was about 86%, much higher than many other immunologic illnesses. Secondly, that many people have been told by their physicians that they have the lupus, and considering that data, that over 1.4 million people in the USA have the disease. Lastly, that the prevalence of the disease, by unsubstantiated claim, would be a very high 1 in 177 patients. The overall conclusion is that more people are being told that they have the disease lupus than previously expected. Self-reporting studies are notoriously inaccurate as the criteria for the disease are not verified, indicating that the numbers derived from this study may not be true.

The economic impact of treatment of severe lupus nephritis with prednisone and intravenous cyclophosphamide

OBJECTIVE

It has been reported that outcomes are improved in patients with severe lupus nephritis treated with combined prednisone and intravenous cyclophosphamide, compared with those treated with prednisone alone. These findings motivated this analysis of the economic impact of the combined therapy.

METHODS

The annual expected incidence of severe lupus nephritis in the year 1988 in the US was estimated to be 1,130. A hypothetical patient cohort of this size was used as the model for the present analysis; the costs of treatment with prednisone alone and with combined prednisone and intravenous cyclophosphamide were calculated and compared. The analysis took into account the expected rate of renal failure with each therapeutic approach, as well as age, sex, and the economic value of working years gained.

RESULTS

Although the treatment costs are higher for the combination therapy, the analysis revealed overall savings due to a reduced need for kidney dialysis or transplantation, and the economic value of working capacity gained. Savings attributable to patient care costs were $50.8 million; those attributable to working capacity gained were $42.3 million.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that over a 10-year period, as much as $93.1 million per annual cohort is saved by the use of combination therapy for the treatment of severe lupus nephritis.

Pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study

The objective of this work was to analyse the course of maternal disease and fetal outcome in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) counselled and followed according to a protocol intended to optimize maternal and fetal outcome. The prospective study included all pregnancies between 1987 and 1993 in SLE patients known at least 6 months before pregnancy at the Lupus Clinic of our hospital. In 25 patients there were 35 pregnancies. Thirty-four (97%) started at sustained remission of disease; 11 (31%) were in women with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL); 14 (40%) in women with a history of biopsy-proven lupus nephritis; one (3% in a woman with a serum creatinine above 125 mumol/l. In 29 pregnancies (82%) maternal disease remained inactive during gestation. In three pregnancies (9%) active disease was treated with prednisone. There were no serious post-partum flares of disease. Pregnancy resulted in 25 (71%) live births, 8 (23%) first trimester abortions, and one intrauterine fetal death. One pregnancy was terminated because of hydrocephalus. Nine of 25 (36%) live births were delivered by caesarean section. For 6 of 9 (67%) caesarean sections the indication was fetal distress and pre-eclampsia. In the majority of patients with SLE who conceive at remission, the disease does not flare in pregnancy. With optimal obstetric care, close follow-up and treatment with low-dose aspirin if aPL are present, a high success rate (71%) can be achieved.

Changes in the incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in England and Wales, 1970-1982

Data from the Second and Third National Studies of Morbidity Statistics from General Practice, conducted from 1970 to 1972 and 1981 to 1982, respectively, by the General Practice Research Unit of the Royal College of General Practitioners, were analyzed to estimate morbidity rates of RA and examine changes in these rates over time. The age-adjusted annual incidence of RA in females fell from 3.3 to 2.6 cases per 1,000 person-years from 1970 to 1972 and 1980 to 1981; there was no change observed in males. Over the same time interval, there was a rise in age-adjusted period prevalence of RA in both sexes from 6.4 to 7.5 per 1,000 and 2.8 to 3.5 per 1,000 in females and males, respectively. These data, which should be interpreted with caution, confirm a decline in incidence of RA in females and demonstrate an increase in prevalence of RA in both sexes over the past decade.