Pulse steroid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: can equivalent doses of oral prednisolone give similar clinical results to intravenous methylprednisolone?

The efficacy of systemic glucocorticosteroids for pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are recommended to suppress inflammation in people with active RA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the effects of systemic GCs on RA pain.

Methods

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in RA comparing systemic GCs to inactive treatment. Three databases were and spontaneous pain and evoked pain outcomes were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences were meta-analysed. Heterogeneity (I², tau statistics) and bias (funnel plot, Egger’s test) were assessed. Subgroup analyses investigated sources of variation. This study was pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42019111562).

Results

A total of 18 903 titles, 880 abstracts and 226 full texts were assessed. Thirty-three RCTs suitable for the meta-analysis included 3123 participants. Pain scores (spontaneous pain) decreased in participants treated with oral GCs; SMD = −0.65 (15 studies, 95% CI −0.82, −0.49, P <0.001) with significant heterogeneity (I² = 56%, P =0.0002). Efficacy displayed time-related decreases after GC initiation. Mean difference visual analogue scale pain was −15 mm (95% CI −20, −9) greater improvement in GC than control at ≤3 months, −8 mm (95% CI −12, −3) at >3–6 months and −7 mm (95% CI −13, 0) at >6 months. Similar findings were obtained when evoked pain outcomes were examined. Data from five RCTs suggested improvement also in fatigue during GC treatment.

Conclusion

Oral GCs are analgesic in RA. The benefit is greatest shortly after initiation and GCs might not achieve clinically important pain relief beyond 3 months. Treatments other than anti-inflammatory GCs should be considered to reduce the long-term burden of pain in RA.

Glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis: the silent companion in the therapeutic strategy

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are key actors in RA management, despite the increasing number of available drugs. In fact, due to their efficacy and safety, the combination therapy between GCs and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) is still recommended in the early phase of RA treatment, because improving the long-term results.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, we reviewed the role of GCs in RA management, focusing on mechanisms of action as well as the benefit/risk ratio of GCs and newer therapeutic formulations. Furthermore, we analyzed GCs DMARDs proprieties on disease activity and their long-term effects on radiographic damage. We designed a narrative review aimed to provide an overview concerning GCs in RA management.

EXPERT OPINION

A large amount of evidence supports the use of GCs in RA, especially in the earliest phases of the disease. Besides GCs symptomatic effects due to their strong anti-inflammatory effects, data from several randomized clinical trials have shown a substantial benefit of low-dose GCs in inhibiting the radiographic damage, thus highlighting GCs DMARDs properties. Besides their recognized role in the treatment of early RA, systematic monitoring of adverse events should be recommended to minimize GCs toxicity.

A randomized clinical trial of oral versus intravenous methylprednisolone for relapse of MS

Background:

Steroids improve multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses but therapeutic window and dose, frequency and administration route remain uncertain.

Objective:

The objective of this paper is to compare the clinical and radiologic efficacy, tolerability and safety of intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP) vs oral methylprednisolone (oMP), at equivalent high doses, for MS relapse.

Methods:

Forty-nine patients with moderate or severe relapse within the previous 15 days were randomized in a double-blind, noninferiority, multicenter trial to receive ivMP or oMP and their matching placebos. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were determined at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12. Brain MRI were assessed at baseline and at weeks 1 and 4. Primary endpoint was a noninferiority assessment of EDSS improvement at four weeks (noninferiority margin of one point), with further key efficacy assessments of number and volume of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+), and new or enlarged T2 lesions at four weeks’ post-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability.

Results:

The study achieved the main outcome of noninferiority at four weeks for improved EDSS score. No differences were found between ivMP and oMP in the number of Gd+ lesions (0 (0–1) vs 0 (0–0.5), p = 0.630), volume of Gd+ lesions (0 (0–88.0) vs 0 (0–32.9) mm3, p = 0.735), or new or enlarged T2 lesions (0 (0–194) vs 0 (0–123), p = 0.769). MP was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions:

This study provides confirmatory evidence that oMP is not inferior to ivMP in reducing EDSS, similar in MRI lesions at four weeks for MS relapses and is equally well tolerated and safe.

Trial registration:

clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00753792

Treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with antiviral therapy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial

A subclinical viral labyrinthitis has been postulated in the literature to elicit idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). An etiologic role for the herpes family is assumed. Corticosteroids possess a limited beneficial effect on hearing recovery in ISSHL. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic value of the antiherpetic drug acyclovir (Zovirax) on hearing recovery in 91 patients with ISSHL who received prednisolone in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The audiometric parameters included pure tone and speech audiometry. Subjective parameters studied included hearing recovery, a pressure sensation in the affected ear, vertigo, and tinnitus. A 1-year follow-up was obtained. Hearing recovery for the whole group averaged about 35 dB and was independent of the severity of the initial hearing loss or vestibular involvement. Speech audiometry improved from 49% to 75%. After 12 months, pressure sensation and vertigo decreased to 15.6% (acyclovir) and 10.3% (placebo) and 12.5% (acyclovir) and 10.7% (placebo), respectively. Tinnitus decreased slightly, to 46.9% (acyclovir) and 55.2% (placebo), in the same period (p > .05 for all parameters). We conclude that no beneficial effect from combining acyclovir with prednisolone can be established in patients with ISSHL.

Radiologic findings of the lumbar spine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and a review of pathologic mechanisms

We have analyzed the radiologic findings on the lumbar spine and the clinical symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A total of 106 patients who fulfilled the revised criteria of the American Rheumatism Association were subjected. All of the patients were asked to fill out a questionnaire about the existence of low back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness. Radiologic features of the lumbar spine, including scoliosis, spondylolisthesis, disc space narrowing, endplate erosion, osteophyte, and osteoporosis, were checked. Radiographs of the cervical spine were also taken. The clinical background of RA, such as mutilating disease or not, was assessed. Forty-two patients (40%) had the symptoms of low back pain. Abnormal radiologic findings in lumbar spine were detected in 57%. The prevalence of clinical symptoms tended to be higher in the patients with endplate erosion. Forty-two percent of the patients had both lumbar and cervical lesions. The prevalence of lumbar lesion was not high in the mutilating type of RA, except for facet erosion and severe osteoporosis. The patients with pulse steroid therapy revealed a higher prevalence of vertebral fracture. From these results, we concluded that lumbar lesions were frequently observed in patients with RA. The possibility of lumbar lesions as well as the lesions in the cervical spine and peripheral joints should be examined in patients with RA.

Pulse glucocorticoids

High-dose intravenous (i.v.) methylprednisolone has been used therapeutically in a number of medical fields to avoid the complications and side effects of long-term glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and because of the perception that high-dose i.v. methylprednisolone may have "special" therapeutic effects. It is possible that aggressive early therapy with GCs allows for a more rapid taper of GCs and therefore prevents some of the dose-related side effects associated with long-term use. Some of the neurologic and rheumatologic literature related to multiple sclerosis and lupus nephritis suggest that i.v. methylprednisolone has therapeutic effects that are different from those of conventional doses of oral prednisone. There is still considerable debate about this in nondermatologic fields, and extrapolation of the role of pulse i.v. methylprednisolone to dermatologic disease, where trials are lacking, is difficult. Given this subset of possible candidates of this therapy as suggested by anecdotal reports, there is at least a rationale for considering the use of this modality in a subset of patients.

Managing early presentation of rheumatoid arthritis. Systematic overview

OBJECTIVE

To describe evidence-based management of patients presenting to family physicians with typical signs and symptoms of recent onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

STUDY SELECTION

Articles for critical review were included if relevant to primary care management of early RA (less than 1 year duration). Sources included MEDLINE from 1966 to December 1995, the reference library of the Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit, and conference abstracts.

FINDINGS

Evidence from randomized, controlled trials supports the short-term benefit of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disease-modifying agents for rheumatic diseases, intravenous pulse corticosteroid therapy, intra-articular therapy, aerobic exercise, patient education, psychologic intervention, home physiotherapy, home occupational therapy, and rehabilitation programs. Some evidence favours acetaminophen for analgesia, low-dose oral corticosteroids for symptom control, and referral to a rheumatologist. Evidence for rest, ice, and heat for symptom control is conflicting and based on low-quality studies.

CONCLUSION

Family physicians play an important role in establishing early and accurate diagnosis of RA, coordinating therapy, and providing ongoing support, education, and monitoring to patients and their families.

Effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in children with acute rheumatic carditis

In order to measure the effects of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (HIVMP) and compare its efficiency with that of oral prednisolone (OP), 18 patients with active rheumatic carditis were studied. Ten patients received OP, while eight patients were treated with HIVMP. Clinical and laboratory responses to treatment were followed by sleeping pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), PR interval on electrocardiogram, spectral and color flow imaging and Doppler echocardiographic findings; mitral and aortic regurgitant jet flow area, left atrial area, proximal width of mitral regurgitant jet area and regurgitation fractions. The results of patients in the HIVMP group showed statistically significant changes in ESR and CTR when compared with the patients receiving OP, and the recovery was more rapid. HIVMP therapy can be considered as a new method of treatment for acute rheumatic carditis.

Steroids in multiple sclerosis

Steroids are widely used in treating the relapse of multiple sclerosis. There is no place for long term steroid therapy of this disease. Current practice is a short course of high dose methylprednisolone which can be repeated after an interval, has proven safety and objectively accelerates recovery.

Severe adverse cardiovascular effects of pulse steroid therapy: is continuous cardiac monitoring necessary?

Pulse steroid therapy (PST) has been used in dermatology to treat a variety of severe inflammatory disorders. Dermatologists have usually recommended that patients be hospitalized for continuous cardiac monitoring during PST administration, although specialists in other fields have administered PST in an outpatient setting. We reviewed the literature concerning serious adverse cardiovascular effects of PST. These were rare and have been mainly reported in nondermatologic patients, typically those with kidney or heart disease. Although outpatient administration of PST may be a safe practice for some dermatologic patients, we cannot make a firm recommendation without a prospective trial.

Corticosteroid pulse therapy in active rheumatoid arthritis

The infusion of high doses of corticosteroids (corticosteroid pulse therapy, CPT) is used to treat refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the first part of this article, literature on the efficacy of CPT is reviewed, and different CPT regimens (high-dose, low-dose, oral CPT) are compared. Several CPT regimens are beneficial in RA, the clinical effect lasting 4 to 10 weeks. Only high-dose CPT (1,000 mg methylprednisolone intravenously) has been shown to bridge the gap between the start and the effect (lag time) of a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug initiated at the same time. A retrospective study on the incidence of short-term and long-term side effects of CPT in 50 patients with RA who received a total of 78 pulse regimens is described in the second part. Side effects occurred frequently, but in most cases they were mild. The possible relationship between CPT and osteonecrosis of the femoral head is discussed. It is concluded that CPT is beneficial in RA. A substantial number of patients suffer side effects of varying severity.

Methylprednisolone in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of oral with intravenous therapy at equivalent high dose

A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of intravenous methylprednisolone versus oral methylprednisolone at equivalent high dose was carried out on 35 patients with an acute relapse of multiple sclerosis (MS). After baseline evaluation each was randomly allocated to oral treatment and intravenous placebo or intravenous treatment and oral placebo, receiving 500 mg of methylprednisolone for five consecutive days and with reassessment at days five and twenty-eight. There was no significant difference in response when disability or functional scores were compared in the two groups. Adverse effects were minor and equally distributed. In this study oral treatment with methylprednisolone was as effective as intravenous treatment in acute relapse of MS.

High dose oral methylprednisolone in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: pharmacokinetics and clinical response

A commercially available 1.0 g intravenous (i.v.) dosage formulation of methylprednisolone, as the sodium hemisuccinate salt (Solu Medrol, Upjohn) was administered both parenterally and orally (pulse steroid therapy) on separate occasions, to eight elderly (mean 65 y) patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. The relative oral bioavailability of the sterol was 69.2%. Elimination of methylprednisolone was prolonged when given orally; the mean residence times were 7.23 h and 3.94 h for oral and i.v. administrations, respectively. Clinical response to pulse steroid therapy was no different with respect to route of administration. There were no significant differences in standard clinical and laboratory assessments of disease activity when the two therapies were compared. Oral administration of methylprednisolone in patients requiring high-dose pulse steroid therapy is convenient and avoids the discomfort and inconvenience associated with i.v. administration.

Intra-articular steroids: confounder of clinical trials

The effect of intra-articular (i-a) steroid injection on ESR and C-reactive protein (CRP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was investigated. One week following injection of 1 or 2 knees there was a significant fall in ESR (p less than 0.0001) and CRP (p less than 0.01) in a cohort of 20 RA patients. The mean drop for both ESR and CRP was 46%. This effect lasted over a variable period up to 6 months. A survey of 50 published drug efficacy studies in RA revealed that, while 44 used ESR and 20 CRP as efficacy measures, 37 neither excluded nor recorded i-a steroid injections during the study. Steroid injections were excluded in 8 studies and recorded in 5, being used as an outcome measure in 2 of these. It is recommended that the frequency with which i-a injections are used in drug efficacy studies is reported and that they are avoided in the 3 months preceding an outcome measurement if ESR or CRP are being used as outcome measures.

Double blind placebo controlled trial of pulse treatment with methylprednisolone combined with disease modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether monthly treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone enhances or accelerates the effect of disease modifying drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

DESIGN

A 12 month double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre trial in which patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomly allocated to receive pulses of either methylprednisolone or saline every four weeks for six months. At the start of the pulse treatment all patients were started on penicillamine or azathioprine.

SETTING

Four rheumatology departments in Denmark.

PATIENTS

97 Patients (71 women, 26 men) aged 23-84 (mean 60) who had active rheumatoid arthritis of at least four weeks' duration despite treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Monthly clinical recording of morning stiffness, number of tender and swollen joints, blinded observers' evaluation of therapeutic effect, and patients' self assessed condition. Concomitant laboratory measurements of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and concentrations of C reactive protein and haemoglobin. Radiography to determine the number of erosions at the start of treatment and after 12 months.

RESULTS

57 Patients completed the trial, taking the same disease modifying drug throughout. Evaluation four weeks after each pulse treatment and at 12 month follow up showed no significant differences between the methylprednisolone and placebo groups in any of the clinical or laboratory variables. Radiography showed the same degree of progression of erosions in both groups. Evaluation of the total data on 97 patients and on the 57 who completed the trial showed the same lack of significance between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous pulse treatment with steroids can be recommended only for rapid temporary relief of flares of disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The response is short lived. Repeated pulses of methylprednisolone at four week intervals do not improve the results of treatment with drugs that induce remission such as penicillamine and azathioprine.

Does steroid pulsing influence the efficacy and toxicity of chrysotherapy? A double blind, placebo controlled study

To test the hypothesis that early steroid pulsing augments the efficacy and decreases the toxicity of chrysotherapy 40 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were studied in a double blind, placebo controlled study. During the first three months of gold treatment group 1 received monthly intravenous methylprednisolone pulsing (steroid group) while group 2 received placebo (placebo group). All patients were assessed clinically and serologically over a 24 week period. Twelve patients were withdrawn before completion of the study and all but one of the remaining 28 patients reported clinical and serological improvements. Two patients in the steroid group were withdrawn owing to gold induced side effects while four were withdrawn in the placebo group. These small numbers were not significantly different. Minor side effects occurred more commonly in the placebo group. The clinical response was clearly better in the steroid group with statistical significance almost being achieved. In an endeavour to obtain a significant conclusion further patients will now be entered into this study.

Pulse methylprednisolone therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Images