Laboratory and imaging studies used by French rheumatologists to determine the cause of recent onset polyarthritis without extra-articular manifestations

Usefulness of routine hepatitis C and hepatitis B serology in the diagnosis of recent-onset arthritis. Systematic prospective screening in all patients seen by the rheumatologists of a defined area--brief report

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies evaluating the usefulness of systematic screening for hepatitis B and C in patients with recent-onset arthritis suffered from a major bias since they were conducted in hospitals. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the relevance of such screening, performed by hospital and office-based rheumatologists of a defined area, in the diagnosis of arthritis or inflammatory polyarthralgia of less than 1 year duration.

METHODS

The CRRRI is a network which includes most hospital and office-based rheumatologists of an area with a population of 506,755 inhabitants. All patients seen by the CRRRI participants in their usual practice between March 2008 and December 2010 for inflammatory polyarthralgia, mono-, oligo-, or polyarthritis of less than 1 year duration were included. Patients' serum samples were screened for the presence of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies, with positive samples further evaluated for HCV-RNA with a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, and for the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-three patients were included (162 women, 71 men; mean age of 50.6±15.8 years). Patients were evaluated for inflammatory polyarthralgia (n=51), monoarthritis (n=21), oligoarthritis (n=35) or polyarthritis (n=126) lasting for a mean 19.8±29.8 weeks. No new HCV or HBV infection diagnosis was done.

CONCLUSION

In this study not suffering from a hospital-selection bias, screening for hepatitis C and B infection was not helpful in the diagnosis process of recent-onset arthritis.

KEY MESSAGES

Systematic hepatitis B and C serology is not relevant in patients with recent-onset (<1 year) arthritis.

Usefulness of the disease activity scores for polymyalgia rheumatica for predicting glucocorticoid dose changes: a study of 243 scenarios

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations linking glucocorticoid dose changes in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) to the PMR activity score (PMR-AS) and its components.

METHODS

Nine clinical vignettes of PMR were written by a panel of experts and submitted to 35 rheumatologists, who were asked to assess disease activity using a visual analog scale (VASph) and to determine whether there was a relapse of PMR requiring an increase in the glucocorticoid dose. In 7 vignettes, >80% of the rheumatologists agreed on the diagnosis of relapse justifying the glucocorticoid dose decision. A total of 243 vignette-physician combinations were obtained. Using these vignettes, we evaluated statistical associations linking a decision to increase the glucocorticoid dose to the value of PMR-AS, of its components (VASph, visual analog scale for pain [VASp], C-reactive protein level [CRP], morning stiffness [MST], and elevation of upper limbs [EUL]), or to the difference in these variables between the last 2 visits (dPMR-AS, dVASph, dVASp, dCRP, dMST, and dEUL).

RESULTS

The strongest associations with a decision to increase the glucocorticoid dose occurred with dPMR-AS >4.2, dMST >10 minutes, dVASph >1.55, and dCRP >4 mg/dl (99.3% sensitivity, 100% specificity for all 4 variables); MST >or=10 minutes (100% sensitivity, 99.3% specificity); PMR-AS >or=7 (98.1% sensitivity, 94.3% specificity); VASph >or=2.25 (94.2% sensitivity, 83.6% specificity); and CRP level >or=14.5 mg/liter (66.3% sensitivity, 99.3% specificity).

CONCLUSION

Despite inter-individual variations in VASph, PMR-AS was a good indicator of disease activity. However, MST, dMST, dVASph, dPMR-AS, and dCRP performed better than PMR-AS. These variables may be useful in tailoring the glucocorticoid dose to the individual needs of each patient.

Costs of workups for the diagnosis of early arthritis: Results of a nationwide survey

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the costs of workups to diagnose early arthritis.

METHODS

In 2000, the French Society for Rheumatology conducted a survey of a representative sample of French and Belgian rheumatologists (n = 239). The respondents were asked to consider 2 hypothetical scenarios, 1 describing undifferentiated arthritis and the other more suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis. They were then asked what diagnostic workup they would order. Costs for each study were determined in 2001 euros, according to the French public health system fee schedules.

RESULTS

In total, 151 rheumatologists participated in the study (63%). The mean +/- SD diagnostic costs were 406.5 +/- 194.3 euro for the case with no diagnostic clues, and 280.7 +/- 154.3 euro for the case suggestive of early RA. Responses were very heterogeneous. The 2 main sources of expenditure were immunology tests and imaging. Hospital staff physicians tended to order more expensive workups, and costs tended to vary inversely with physician experience. The most important predictor of cost was diagnostic doubt, as estimated by the number of diagnoses proposed by respondents in each case; each additional diagnosis cost an additional 19.1-26.1 euro.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic workups after a first medical visit for early polyarthritis result in substantial direct costs. This observation and the great variability observed in physicians' practices point out the need for consensus on the appropriate workups for these patients.

Diagnostic usefulness of routine Lyme serology in patients with early inflammatory arthritis in nonendemic areas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of routine Lyme serology in patients who live in nonendemic areas and present with early inflammatory joint disease.

METHODS

All patients admitted to a rheumatology department of a nonendemic area of France for evaluation of joint disease with onset within the last year. The evaluation included a medical history, a thorough physical examination, an electrocardiogram, and an ELISA for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi.

RESULTS

We included 90 patients, 51 women and 39 men, with a mean age of 48.1 +/- 17.9 years. Mean duration of joint symptoms was 4.3 +/- 4.3 months, with a median of 3 months. A patient (1.1%) reported a tick bite and no patients had a history of erythema migrans. Lyme serology was negative in all 90 patients.

CONCLUSION

These results do not support routine Lyme serology in patients living in nonendemic areas and presenting with early inflammatory joint disease. However, Lyme serology remains appropriate in patients with features suggestive of Lyme disease. Given that Lyme disease is amenable to curative treatment, a larger study is in order to confirm our findings.