Lamellar macular hole after intravitreal ocriplasmin injection

[Microstructural retinal changes after pharmacological vitreolysis with ocriplasmin-an SD-OCT supported analysis]

PURPOSE

Ocriplasmin (Jetrea®) is a therapeutic option for patients with focal vitreomacular traction (VMT) with or without small full thickness macular holes (FTMH) < 400 µm. Retinal alterations after injection with ocriplasmin have been described. The purpose of this essay was to determine Ocriplasmin-associated side-effects and changes in the retinal microstructure.

METHODS

We included 70 patients with ocriplasmin treatment in our study. On all patients SD-OCT (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography) scans were performed prior to injection with Ocriplasmin. If present, adverse events were registered. The OCT scans were then evaluated taking the following into account: macular hole (MH) size, macular edema, subretinal fluid (SRF), changes in the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and the external limiting membrane (ELM).

RESULTS

Twenty of the 70 examined patients showed a preoperative FTMH. One week after ocriplasmin IVI (intravitreal injection) 8 of the 20 FTMHs were already closed. Overall 12 patients showed a FTMH closure and 4 patients developed a FTMH after ocriplasmin IVI. Twelve of the 24 MH (macular hole) patients still required an operative closure of the FTMH. We noticed a resolution of the VMT on 51 patients. Three patients developed a retinal detachment. Furthermore, after ocriplasmin IVI we detected changes in the EZ and ELM on 8 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Ocriplasmin is a substantial minimal invasive option in the therapy of VMT with or without small FTMH. Nevertheless, there seem to be some specific ocriplasmin-associated risks, although usually transient. Severe complications like retinal detachment are rare but exist. Therefore, every indication of ocriplasmin should be considered carefully.

Lamellar Macular Hole: State of the Art

Lamellar macular hole (LMH) is a vitreoretinal disorder characterized by an irregular foveal contour, a break in the inner fovea, dehiscence of the inner foveal retina from the outer retina, and the absence of a full-thickness foveal defect with intact foveal photoreceptors. The pathogenesis is only partially known. The advent of high-resolution optical coherence tomography has allowed distinguishing between two types of epiretinal membrane (ERM) associated with LMH: a conventional ERM (commonly found in macular pucker) and an atypical ERM (known by varied names: dense, epiretinal proliferation, or degenerative). These two types of ERM not only influence LMH morphology but also differ in cell and collagen composition. It remains unclear if these two types are indeed two distinct clinical entities or rather two stages of the same macular disorder. Studies of the natural evolution of LMH have not fully resolved this issue and also offered variable results. Surgical treatment leads to excellent anatomical and functional outcomes, but not without risks. This review provides a critical summary of the available data on LMH including some new insights.

Ocriplasmin: who is the best candidate?

Enzymatic vitreolysis is currently the focus of attention around the world for treating vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. Induction of posterior vitreous detachment is an active area of developmental clinical and basic research. Despite exerting an incompletely elucidated physiological effect, ocriplasmin (also known as microplasmin) has been recognized to serve as a well-tolerated intravitreal injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction and full-thickness macular hole. There are several unexplored areas of intervention where enzymatic vitreolysis could potentially be used (ie, diabetic macular edema). Recent promising studies have included combinations of enzymatic approaches and new synthetic molecules that induce complete posterior vitreous detachment as well as antiangiogenesis. Although no guidelines have been proposed for the use of ocriplasmin, this review attempts to aid physicians in answering the most important question, "Who is the best candidate?"

Complications of intravitreal ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a prospective spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of intravitreal ocriplasmin prospectively, reporting potential complications in patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) alone or associated with macular hole (MH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants in this prospective, multicenter study, were 24 patients with VMT (17 with VMT alone and seven with MH combined with VMT). All patients were treated with a single ocriplasmin injection and followed-up prospectively at baseline, day 7, 28 and the last examination of the follow-up for each patient (mean ± SD: 64.2 ± 24.4 d, range: 40-145 d). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography was performed at each visit while the percentage of resolution of VMT and the association with various potential adverse events were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

66.7% of patients presented VMT release at the end of the follow-up, while 28.6% exhibited MH closure. Severe adverse events, such as enlargement of preexisting MH and formation of lamellar MH, were observed in one and four cases, respectively and remained till the end of the follow-up. Moderate adverse events, such as ellipsoid zone disruption and subretinal fluid development, became evident seven days after injection, in four cases. Formation of cystoid macular edema (CME), not evident at baseline, was noticed in three cases at day 28 after injection. Mild adverse events, like vitreous floaters, photopsias, eye pain and foreign body sensation, were noticed at day 7 and resolved till the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Mild and moderate adverse events occurred mainly during the first week of the follow-up, while severe adverse events, such as the lamellar MH formation and CME at day 28 post injection were seen.