Dynamic right-to-left interatrial shunt may complicate severe COVID-19

Association between Covid-19 infection and platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome

Introduction and importance

Platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome is defined as dyspnoea and deoxygenation when changing from a recumbent to an upright position. Post-Covid-19 sequelae can induce or exacerbate pulmonary hypertension and thereby render a previously mild and asymptomatic platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome to manifest with new or worsening symptoms.

Case presentation

The authors present the case of an 80-year-old man who following an episode of moderate-severe Covid-19 infection developed type I respiratory failure that required hospital discharge with long-term oxygen therapy. He had a background history of postural paroxysmal hypoxaemia which had previously raised the suspicion of a right-to-left shunt through either a patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defect or an intrapulmonary arteriovenous malformation. However, given the low burden of symptoms this was not explored further. Following recovery from Covid-19 infection, the patient experienced marked dyspnoea and oxygen desaturation in an upright position that was relieved by a return to a supine position.

Discussion and conclusion

Persistent dyspnoea and hypoxia are common symptoms in patients who experience post-Covid-19 syndrome. However, when patients with prior moderate-to-severe Covid-19 illness present with new onset breathlessness and/or desaturation that is worsened in an upright position, platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome should be considered.

Evaluating the one-time chair stand test for predicting the coronavirus disease severity in patients during hospital admission: a cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to understand whether the one-time chair stand test (CS-1) is useful for predicting the severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in 101 patients admitted to the hospital with acute respiratory failure.

METHODS

This single-centered, prospective observational cohort study enrolled 101 critically ill adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent the CS-1 as a dynamic evaluation tool in clinical practice between late April 2020 and October 2021. Data on demographic characteristics, symptoms, laboratory values, computed tomography findings, and clinical course after admission were collected. Furthermore, the data was compared, and the association between the intubation and non-intubation groups was determined. We also calculated the cutoff point, area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the change in oxygen saturation (ΔSpO₂) during the CS-1.

RESULTS

Thirty-three out of 101 patients (33%) were intubated during hospitalization. There was no significant difference in the resting SpO₂ (93.3% versus 95.2%, P = 0.22), but there was a significant difference in ΔSpO₂ during the CS-1 between the intubation and non-intubation groups (10.8% versus 5.5%, P < 0.01). In addition, there was a significant correlation between hospitalization and ΔSpO₂ during the CS-1 (ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01). The generated cutoff point was calculated as 9.5% (AUC = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-1.00).

CONCLUSION

For COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure, the CS-1 performed on admission was useful for predicting the severity of COVID-19. Furthermore, the CS-1 can be utilized as a remote and simple evaluation parameter. Thus, it could have potential clinical applications in the future.