Pretreatment of posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide has beneficial effects for grid pattern photocoagulation against diffuse diabetic macular oedema

Poly-γ-glutamic acid nanoparticles as adjuvant and antigen carrier system for cancer vaccination

Vaccination is an innovative strategy for cancer treatment by leveraging various components of the patients' immunity to boost an anti-tumor immune response. Rationally designed nanoparticles are well suited to maximize cancer vaccination by the inclusion of immune stimulatory adjuvants. Also, nanoparticles might control the pharmacokinetics and destination of the immune potentiating compounds. Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) based nanoparticles (NPs), which have a natural origin, can be easily taken up by dendritic cells (DCs), which leads to the secretion of cytokines which ameliorates the stimulation capacity of T cells. The intrinsic adjuvant properties and antigen carrier properties of γ-PGA NPs have been the focus of recent investigations as they can modulate the tumor microenvironment, can contribute to systemic anti-tumor immunity and subsequently inhibit tumor growth. This review provides a comprehensive overview on the potential of γ-PGA NPs as antigen carriers and/or adjuvants for anti-cancer vaccination.

Review of clinical studies and recommendation for a therapeutic flow chart for diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME), characterized by exudative fluid accumulation in the macula, is the most common form of sight-threatening retinopathy in patients with diabetes. The management of DME has changed considerably in recent years, especially following the development of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy which has emerged as a first-line therapy for center-involved DME. Laser treatment, intravitreal steroid therapy, and vitrectomy are also important treatment options for DME. We believe that it is important to choose the most appropriate treatment option for DME based on the clinical evidences, in addition to the careful consideration of individual patients' general or ocular condition, DME characteristics, patients' motivation, and compliance to the treatment in real-world clinical practice. In this review, we have summarized important clinical evidences for the main treatments for DME, presented an expert review for these evidences, and proposed a recommended therapeutic flow chart for DME. We hope that our review of the clinical evidences and the recommended therapeutic flow chart for DME will contribute to better treatment outcome for DME.

Reduction in the frequency of intravitreal bevacizumab administrations achieved by posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) during treatment with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) in eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).

METHODS

Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME with foveal thickness (FT) greater than 400 μm were studied. Initially, both eyes of each patient received 1.25 mg/0.05 ml of IVB. One eye then received 20 mg/0.5 ml of STTA at the onset and at 16, 32, and 48 weeks. For the control, the other eye was not treated with STTA. Patients were treated with additional IVB when DDME recurred during the study to maintain the FT at <350 μm. The FT, logMAR visual acuity (VA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were monitored monthly for 56 weeks. The total number of IVB injections during the 1-year follow-up was also calculated.

RESULTS

STTA-treated eyes had significantly more regression of FT and improvement of VA at several time points during the study than did the controls. The mean (SD) required number of IVB injections in the STTA-treated eyes during the study was 5.00 ± 1.75, which was significantly less than the 7.95 ± 1.57 in the control eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive STTA therapy to IVB for the treatment of DDME not only improved the morphological and functional regressions but also reduced the frequency of IVB treatments.

Effects of sub-Tenon's capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection combined with microaneurysm photocoagulation on diabetic macular edema

Purpose

To compare the effects of sub-Tenon’s capsule triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection to that of STTA injection combined with microaneurysm photocoagulation (MAPC; STTA + MAPC) on eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Patients and methods

The medical records of 138 eyes of 138 patients with DME treated by either STTA or STTA + MAPC were reviewed. The degree of DME was determined by the optical coherence tomographic features: patients with serous retinal detachment (SRD+; 38 eyes) and patients without SRD (non-SRD; 100 eyes). The central macular thickness (CMT) and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured periodically for 6 months after the treatments.

Results

The BCVA was significantly improved in the non-SRD group after STTA + MAPC. The CMT was significantly improved in all groups and improved considerably more in the non-SRD group than in the SRD+ group after STTA + MAPC.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that MAPC has an additive effect in the non-SRD type.

Indocyanine Green Angiography-Guided Focal Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to detect leaking spots and the effectiveness of ICGA-guided focal laser photocoagulation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Ten eyes (8 patients) with diffuse DME diagnosed using fluorescein angiography (FA) and refractory to a sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA), grid laser photocoagulation, or both were enrolled. FA and ICGA were performed using the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 2. Hyperfluorescent spots on early-phase FA and on early- and late-phase ICGA were superimposed onto the macular thickness map measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and counted to calculate the spot density in the area with or without macular edema (ME). ICGA-guided focal laser photocoagulation was carried out. In 7 eyes, STTA was simultaneously performed. The central macular thickness (CRT) and macular volume (MV) were measured by OCT.

RESULTS

On early-phase FA, 4.8 ± 2.3 and 2.3 ± 1.5 hyperfluorescent spots/disk area were observed inside and outside the ME, respectively. In contrast, the spot density was significantly decreased to 1.8 ± 0.9 inside the ME and was only 0.3 ± 0.4 outside the ME on late-phase ICGA (p < 0.01). The mean follow-up period after ICGA-guided photocoagulation was 19.0 months. The mean best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.77 ± 0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at baseline to 0.52 ± 0.37 at the last visit (p < 0.01). Both CRT and MV significantly decreased (p < 0.01). Recurrence of DME was observed in 4 eyes: 3 eyes were treatable only with STTA and 1 required additional ICGA-guided laser photocoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

ICGA may be useful to detect leaking spots responsible for DME, enabling less invasive focal laser photocoagulation even in some of the eyes with diffuse DME.

Intravitreal bevacizumab versus posterior subtenon triamcinolone in diffuse diabetic macular edema

The aim of the study was to compare intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and posterior subtenon triamcinolone (PST) as an adjunct to laser treatment in diffuse diabetic macular edema (Diffuse DME). Prospective-randomized control trial of 30 eyes of 30 diabetic patients having Diffuse DME with maximum retinal thickness (MRT) was more than or equal to 350 µm. The subjects were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A (12 eyes) received IVB and group B received PST (18 patients) before laser treatment. Grid laser treatment was done when the MRT decreased to less than 350 µm. OCT thickness-guided repeat injections were given if required. The patients had minimum follow-up of 6 months. At 6-month follow-up, the two groups were compared for (1) Maximum change in visual acuity letter score using logMAR chart (2) Reduction in MRT on OCT. The mean logMAR visual acuity at baseline was 0.63 ± 0.45 (0-1.6) in group A and was 0.76 ± 0.38 (0.2-1.3) in group B. The mean logMAR visual acuity at 6 month in group A was 0.34 ± 0.21 (0-0.6) and in group B was 0.64 ± 0.37 (0.3-1.3). The mean visual acuity at last follow-up was significantly better in group A than group B (p = 0.02). The mean change in MRT in Group A and Group B was 177.8 ± 85.64 and 156.07 ± 102.86, respectively, which was significantly better than the baseline in both the groups and was comparable in both groups. The study provides evidence to support the use of IVB over PST in diffuse diabetic macular edema.

Effects of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab on inflammatory cytokines in the vitreous with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effects of preoperative intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) on the levels of 27 inflammatory cytokines, including interleukins (ILs) and vascular endothelial growth factor.

METHODS

From among 200 patients who had proliferative diabetic retinopathy and underwent vitrectomy in our department from September 2009 to October 2010, 8 study subjects met the enrollment criteria in which both eyes at nearly equivalent stages underwent vitrectomy. The first vitrectomy for each patient was performed without IVB (control group), whereas the second vitrectomy on the contralateral eye was performed with IVB treatment (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) 3 days before surgery (IVB group). Undiluted vitreous fluid was collected at the start of each vitrectomy. A multiplex assay was used to simultaneously determine the levels of 27 inflammatory cytokines and growth factors.

RESULTS

Mean vascular endothelial growth factor levels were significantly lower in the IVB group (519.69 pg/mL) than in the control group (11,807.44 pg/mL) (P = 0.012, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Moreover, the mean levels (IVB/control, pg/mL) of IL-1RA (38.50/62.31, P = 0.036), IL-5 (27.75/34.00, P = 0.018), IL-10 (433.63/1,995.94, P = 0.012), IL-12 (246.69/1,033.69, P = 0.012), IL-13 (707.50/1,450.38, P = 0.012), and interferon γ (71.13/84.69, P = 0.036) were significantly lower in the IVB group. No other significant differences were observed in the levels of the other 20 cytokines and growth factors between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative IVB reduced not only the intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor level but also the intravitreal levels of other inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1RA, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, and interferon γ. These results indicate the interaction of some cytokines in the vitreous fluid of proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients and suggest the possibility that preoperative IVB may not only reduce vascular proliferation by its direct antivascular endothelial growth factor effect but also modulate the inflammatory response through putative cytokine networks. None of the other cytokines examined were elevated after IVB.

Treatment options for diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To describe the current management of diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME).

METHODS

Review and discussion of the literature regarding DDME.

RESULTS

Diffuse diabetic macular edema is a condition that can be managed by means of several treatment options, including focal/grid laser photocoagulation, intravitreal or periocular corticosteroids, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though there is no randomized clinical trial specifically designed to assess the best treatment approach for DDME, new therapeutic approaches based on intravitreal injections of corticosteroid and anti-VEGF molecules offer new hope for its management.

Comparing intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab injections for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema: a randomized double-blind study

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide and bevacizumab in reducing macular thickness, which was measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

METHODS

  The patients received a single intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg bevacizumab in one randomly selected eye and 4.0 mg triamcinolone acetonide in the contralateral eye. Central foveal thickness measurement (CFT) with OCT was taken at the initial visit and at the 4-week, 12-week and 24-week visits.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (22 eyes) were enrolled and statistically analysed. CFT reduced in the eyes treated with triamcinolone and those treated with bevacizumab in weeks 4 and 12 (p < 0.05). At the 24-week follow-up, no significant difference was noted, relative to the initial visit. Comparing the two groups treated with different drugs, a statistically significant difference in CFT in weeks 4 and 12 was noted, with a more significant reduction in triamcinolone-treated eyes (p < 0.05). Regarding visual acuity (VA), patients treated with triamcinolone had improvement in VA at 4-week (p = 0.02) and 12-week follow-up (p = 0.01), while the group treated with bevacizumab had VA improvement at 4 -week follow-up (p = 0.02). Among the eyes treated with triamcinolone, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement of more than 21 mmHg was found in three eyes (27.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal triamcinolone proved to be more efficient in reducing DMO, providing longer lasting visual improvement, relative to bevacizumab. Eyes treated with triamcinolone had the highest percentage increase in IOP. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Diabetic retinopathy (treatment)

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of blindness in the UK, with older people and those with worse diabetes control, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia being most at risk. Diabetic retinopathy can cause microaneurysms, haemorrhages, exudates, changes to blood vessels, and retinal thickening.

METHODS AND OUTCOMES

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments in people with diabetic retinopathy? What are the effects of treatments for vitreous haemorrhage? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

RESULTS

We found 58 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation, focal and grid laser photocoagulation for maculopathy, corticosteroids for macular oedema, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, and vitrectomy for vitreous haemorrhage.

Intraocular and systemic pharmacokinetics of triamcinolone acetonide after a single 40-mg posterior subtenon application

PURPOSE

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in aqueous, vitreous, and systemic circulation after a single subtenon injection.

DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-six patients (36 eyes) who received a single posterior subtenon injection of TA (40 mg in 0.4 ml).

METHODS

Aqueous, vitreous, and blood samples were obtained at 1-hour, 1-day, 3-day, 5-day, 10-day, 14-day, 21-day, and 28-day time points after the posterior subtenon TA injection. At each time point, there were 3 to 6 eyes (patients). The concentrations of TA in the aqueous, vitreous, and plasma were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Triamcinolone acetonide concentration in the samples was measured, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

The TA concentration-time profile in aqueous consisted of a fast distribution phase during the first 24 hours and a slow elimination phase thereafter. In contrast, the TA concentration-time profile in vitreous consisted of an absorption phase during the first 24 hours followed by a slow elimination phase. The TA in plasma followed a mono-exponential elimination during the study course. The TA concentration peak time for aqueous and plasma was at 1 hour and 24 hours, for vitreous after subtenon injection. The terminal elimination half-life in aqueous, vitreous, and plasma was 11.8, 17.1, and 25 days, respectively. The integral of the area under the concentration time curve (AUC(0-∞)) was 862 ng/day/ml for aqueous, 1262 ng/day/ml for vitreous, and 17.4 ng/day/ml for plasma. The total TA exposure to vitreous was 46% more than total TA exposure to the aqueous. The TA concentration in vitreous was 70- to 98-fold higher than that in plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior subtenon TA application can provide a sustained high local ocular TA level while also resulting in a very low systemic TA level, which may be well below the normal glucocorticoid level in humans.

Steroid injection in addition to macular laser grid photocoagulation in diabetic macular oedema: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the evidence for the effects of steroid injection in addition to macular laser grid (MLG) photocoagulation versus those of MLG photocoagulation alone on visual acuity (VA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

METHODS

An extensive literature search in Medline (PubMed), Experta Medica (EMBASE) and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) using synonyms for MLG photocoagulation, steroid injection and DMO found 181 articles. Of the articles that met selection criteria, three studies in which patients receiving MLG photocoagulation were randomized to additional pretreatment with steroids provided the best available evidence. In addition to VA, central foveal thickness (CFT) was measured at baseline and at 6 months in all three studies.

RESULTS

Two studies, with total populations of 73 and 42 eyes, respectively, reported no additional effect of steroid injection on VA. One study, with a total of 41 eyes, reported a beneficial effect of pretreatment with steroids on VA of -0.21 ETDRS logMAR units. All three studies reported larger reductions in CFT in eyes pretreated with steroids, the smallest of which was 64 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a greater reduction in CFT in eyes pretreated with steroids, this does not consistently result in higher VA. The literature search does not provide sufficiently strong evidence to recommend steroid injection before MLG photocoagulation in DMO.

Systemic absorption of triamcinolone acetonide after posterior sub-Tenon injection

PURPOSE

To study systemic absorption of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) after posterior sub-Tenon injection.

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on 35 eyes in which posterior sub-Tenon injection of 40 mg TA was administered after conventional extracapsular cataract extraction. Patients who had received any systemic steroid over 6 weeks preceding the period of study or had inflammatory ocular conditions were excluded. Serum TA levels were estimated by high-performance liquid chromatography at 1, 2, 3, 24, and 48 hours and 1, 2, and 6 weeks after injection.

RESULTS

Significant levels of the drug were detected in 45.71% of samples (mean serum levels, 6.94 +/- 8.98 ng/ml; P < .001) at 1 hour after sub-Tenon injection, in 85.71% of samples (mean serum levels, 21.83 +/- 12.92 ng/ml; P < .001) at 2 hours after injection, in 100% of samples (mean serum levels, 47.14 +/- 12.20 ng/ml; P < .001) at 3 hours after injection, in 100% of samples (mean serum levels, 35.49 +/- 13.79 ng/ml; P < .001) at 24 hours after injection, in 62.86% of samples (mean serum levels, 10.46 +/- 10.69 ng/ml; P < .001) at 48 hours after injection, and in 28.57% of samples (mean serum levels, 3.74 +/- 6.45 ng/ml; P = .002) at 1 week after injection. The drug was not detected in any of the samples obtained 2 weeks and 6 weeks later.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior sub-Tenon injection of 40 mg TA adds statistically significant quantities to physiologic concentration of corticosteroids in peripheral blood. This may be detrimental for patients having certain metabolic diseases like diabetes and preferably should be avoided or administered with caution.

Primary treatment of diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss in older Americans. Thermal laser treatment remains the mainstay of treatment for DME. Recently, alternative primary treatments for DME have been evaluated. These treatments include intravitreal injections of steroids as well as pharmaceuticals containing antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Surgical treatment has been shown to be appropriate in selected cases. We review the evidence and scientific rationale for various primary treatment options in patients with DME. Regular and timely ophthalmologic evaluation remains crucial to recognition and treatment of macular edema in diabetic patients.

Drug reflux during posterior subtenon infusion of triamcinolone acetonide in diffuse diabetic macular edema not only brings insufficient reduction but also causes elevation of intraocular pressure

BACKGROUND

At the time of posterior subtenon infusion of triamcinolone acetonide (STI-TA) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), drug reflux of TA has sometimes been observed from the conjunctival incision site. We investigated the influence of this reflux on regression of DME and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP).

METHODS

STI-TA was performed on one hundred and twenty-four eyes of 88 consecutive patients with DME. Eligible eyes were divided into two groups: those with observed drug reflux of TA and those without observed drug reflux of TA. Visual acuity (VA), foveal thickness (FT) and IOP were monitored in each eye for up to 12 weeks after STI-TA.

RESULTS

STI-TA with drug reflux was observed in ten individual eyes of seven patients. These patients were significantly younger than those patients without observed drug reflux. After STI-TA, both improvement of VA and regression of FT in reflux(+) eyes were less than in reflux(-) eyes. Postoperative IOP elevation in reflux(+) eyes was much higher, and four of the ten eyes needed anti-glaucoma therapy. This was in contrast to three of the 118 eyes without drug reflux that required anti-glaucoma therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

At the time of STI-TA in DME, drug reflux of TA is a risk factor not only for insufficient reduction of edema, but also for postoperative IOP elevation.

Diabetic macular edema: what is focal and what is diffuse?

PURPOSE

To review the available information on classification of diabetic macular edema (DME) as focal or diffuse.

DESIGN

Interpretive essay.

METHODS

Literature review and interpretation.

RESULTS

The terms focal diabetic macular edema and diffuse diabetic macular edema frequently are used without clear definitions. Published definitions often use different examination methods and often are inconsistent. Evaluating published information on the prevalence of focal and diffuse DME, the responses of focal and diffuse DME to treatments, and the importance of focal and diffuse DME in assessing prognosis is hindered because the terms are used inconsistently. A newer vocabulary may be more constructive, one that describes discrete components of the concepts such as extent and location of macular thickening, involvement of the center of the macula, quantity and pattern of lipid exudates, source of fluorescein leakage, and regional variation in macular thickening and that distinguishes these terms from the use of the term focal when describing one type of photocoagulation technique. Developing methods for assessing component variables that can be used in clinical practice and establishing reproducibility of the methods are important tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence exists that characteristics of DME described by the terms focal and diffuse help to explain variation in visual acuity or response to treatment. It is unresolved whether a concept of focal and diffuse DME will prove clinically useful despite frequent use of the terms when describing management of DME. Further studies to address the issues are needed.

Posterior sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide as pretreatment for focal laser photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema patients

PURPOSE

To determine whether a posterior sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) before focal photocoagulation is safe and effective in patients with diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

Sixteen eyes of 11 diabetic patients with unresolved diffuse macular edema were treated with a 20-mg sub-Tenon injection of TA 1 to 2 months before focal photocoagulation. Focal photocoagulation was applied only to microaneurysms, and grid laser photocoagulation was not performed. The main outcome measures used were visual acuity (VA), central macular thickness (CMT) determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the fluorescein angiographic appearance of the retina. Patients were followed for at least 6 months.

RESULTS

One month after the sub-Tenon injection of TA, the macular edema was resolved with a significant reduction of the CMT on OCT. VA improved slightly. Subsequent focal photocoagulation of the microaneurysms maintained the significant reduction of CMT for up to 6 months. A significant improvement of VA was observed in 37.5% patients at 6 months, and there was no decrease in VA in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A 20-mg sub-Tenon TA injection prior to focal laser photocoagulation is a safe and beneficial treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To compare the effect of an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, with that of triamcinolone acetonide, a corticosteroid for reduction of diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Prospective, comparative interventional case series.

METHODS

Twenty-eight eyes of 14 patients with bilateral DME participated in this study. In each patient, one eye received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide and the other eye received 1.25 mg bevacizumab. The clinical course of best-corrected visual acuity (VA) with a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart and averaged foveal thickness using optical coherence tomography was monitored for up to 24 weeks after the injection.

RESULTS

Before the injection, foveal thickness and VA were 522.3 +/- 91.3 microm and 0.64 +/- 0.28 microm in the triamcinolone-injected eye, and 527.6 +/- 78.8 microm and 0.61 +/- 0.18 microm in the bevacizumab-injected eye, respectively; there was no significant difference between the eyes. One week after the injection, both eyes showed significant regression of macular edema. The triamcinolone-injected eye (342.6 +/- 85.5 microm and 0.33 +/- 0.21 microm) showed significantly better results than the bevacizumab-injected eye (397.6 +/- 103.0 microm and 0.37 +/- 0.17 microm). However, both eyes showed the recurrence of macular edema with time, even at 24 weeks. Triamcinolone (410.4 +/- 82.4 microm and 0.47 +/- 0.25 microm) kept better results than bevacizumab (501.6 +/- 92.5 microm and 0.61 +/- 0.17 microm).

CONCLUSIONS

With the generally used concentration, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide showed better results in reducing DME and in the improvement of VA than that of bevacizumab, suggesting that the pathogenesis of DME is not only attributable to VEGF-dependency, but is also attributable to other mechanisms suppressed by corticosteroid.