The effects of shoe-worn insoles on gait biomechanics in people with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Osteoarthritic Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Characteristics During Weightbearing With Arch-Supported and Standalone Lateral Wedge Insoles

Imbalanced joint load distribution across the tibiofemoral surface is a risk factor for osteoarthritic changes to this joint. Lateral wedge insoles, with and without arch support, are a form of biomechanical intervention that can redistribute tibiofemoral joint load, as estimated by external measures of knee load. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of these insoles on the internal joint contact characteristics of osteoarthritic knees during weightbearing. Fifteen adults with tibiofemoral osteoarthritis underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the affected knee, while standing under 3 insole conditions: flat control, lateral wedge alone, and lateral wedge with arch support. Images were processed, and the surface area and centroid location of joint contact were quantified separately for the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. Medial contact surface area was increased with the 2 lateral wedge conditions compared with the control (P ≤ .012). A more anterior contact centroid was observed in the medial compartment in the lateral wedge with arch support compared with the lateral wedge alone (P = .009). Significant changes in lateral compartment joint contact outcomes were not observed. These findings represent early insights into how loading at the tibiofemoral interface may be altered by lateral wedge insoles as a potential intervention for knee osteoarthritis.

Evaluation and management of knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) significantly contributes to the global disability burden, with its incidence expected to escalate by 74.9% by 2050. The urgency to comprehend and tackle this condition is critical, necessitating an updated and thorough review of KOA. A systematic review up to February 26, 2024, has elucidated the principal aspects of KOA's pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical manifestations, and contemporary management paradigms. The origins of KOA are intricately linked to mechanical, inflammatory, and metabolic disturbances that impair joint function. Notable risk factors include age, obesity, and previous knee injuries. Diagnosis predominantly relies on clinical assessment, with radiographic evaluation reserved conditionally. The significance of rehabilitation assessments, informed by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health framework, is highlighted. Treatment strategies are diverse, prioritizing nonpharmacological measures such as patient education, exercise, and weight management, with pharmacological interventions considered adjuncts. Intra-articular injections and surgical options are contemplated for instances where conventional management is inadequate. KOA stands as a predominant disability cause globally, characterized by a complex etiology and profound effects on individuals' quality of life. Early, proactive management focusing on nonpharmacological interventions forms the cornerstone of treatment, aiming to alleviate symptoms and enhance joint function. This comprehensive review underscores the need for early diagnosis, individualized treatment plans, and the integration of rehabilitation assessments to optimize patient outcomes. Further research is needed to refine prevention strategies and improve management outcomes for KOA patients.

Perceptions of human movement researchers and clinicians on the barriers and facilitators to health research data sharing in Africa

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of research data sharing abound in the literature. However, some factors define how researchers and clinicians approach the challenges surrounding sharing human movement health research data.

PURPOSE

To describe the perceptions of human movement researchers and clinicians on the barriers and facilitators to research data sharing in Africa.

METHOD

A qualitative descriptive design with a purposive sampling method was used. In-depth interviews with human movement researchers and clinicians across Africa were conducted online via Microsoft Teams. Sixteen (n = 16) participants took part in this study. This sample size was representative of East, West, Northern, and Southern Africa. Efforts made to engage with participants in Central Africa were unsuccessful.

RESULT

Five themes emerged: 1) the researcher-clinician gap; 2) technological pros and cons in Africa; 3) cost matters; 4) bureaucracy and ethical factors; and 5) the unique African perspective. Mainly, barriers rather than facilitators to data sharing exist among African human movement researchers and clinicians.

CONCLUSION

There needs to be a societal and psychological shift through reorientation to encourage data sharing among African human movement researchers and clinicians.

Biomechanical response of lower limb joints to lateral wedge insoles

Lateral wedge insole (LWI) is a frequently recommended treatment option for early and midterm stages of medial knee osteoarthritis. However, studies of its effects on the lower limb joints are incomplete and imperfect. The main purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the response of intervention of LWI on lower-limb joint kinematics, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and centre of pressure (COP). Gait analysis of 16 healthy subjects was conducted. Three-dimensional motion data and force plate measurements were collected in the control (barefoot) and experimental conditions (wearing a pair of assigned shoes with 0, 7, and 10 mm LWIs). Results showed that the peak knee flexion angle was increased by 3.43°, 3.09°, and 3.27° with 0, 7, and 10 mm LWIs, respectively (p < 0.01). The ankle peak dorsiflexion angle was significantly decreased by 3.79°, 2.19°, and 1.66° with 0, 7, and 10 mm LWIs, respectively (p = 0.02). The internal rotation angle was increased by 2.78°, 3.76°, and 4.58° with 0, 7, and 10 mm LWIs, respectively (p < 0.01). The forefoot with LWIs showed highly significantly smaller inversion, eversion, and adduction angles (all p < 0.01). The 1st peak of the vertical GRF (p = 0.016) also increased significantly by a maximum of 0.06 body weight (BW) with LWIs. These results indicated that biomechanical changes and limitations of lateral wedges insole should be analyzed in more detail, possibly leading to new guidelines for the design and application.

Exploring the Potential of Lateral Wedge Insoles in Alleviating Bone Marrow Lesions in End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: A Preliminary Case Report

The efficacy of lateral wedge insoles (LWIs) in patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. A 43-year-old male underwent two anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in his right knee and was later diagnosed with end-stage knee OA. An LWI combining arch support with a lateral heel wedge was fabricated for this patient and used over 12 months. As a result, after 12 months, the bone marrow lesion (BML), as measured by the magnetic resonance imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS), was downgraded from grade 2 to grade 1. The use of LWI in a patient with end-stage knee OA showed lower co-contraction ratios in knee muscles even after 12 months. The results provide preliminary evidence suggesting the use of LWI in patients with end-stage knee OA has potential benefits for reducing BML.

Clinically-accessible and laboratory-derived predictors of biomechanical response to standalone and supported lateral wedge insoles in people with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Lateral wedge insoles (both standalone and those incorporating individualized arch support) have been frequently studied for the effects on knee joint loading and pain in people with knee osteoarthritis. It has been shown that many people who use these insoles do not obtain the intended biomechanical effect, and thus may not experience a clinical benefit. The ability to identify biomechanical responders to lateral wedge insoles before research or clinical intervention is an important objective for efficient resource use and optimizing patient outcomes. The purpose of our exploratory, hypothesis-generating study was to provide an initial assessment of variables that are associated with the biomechanical response to lateral wedge insoles in people with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

We collected a number of demographic (age, sex, body mass index, foot posture), clinical (knee pain, foot pain, radiographic disease severity), and walking-related (speed, knee alignment, frontal plane subtalar movement, and foot rotation) outcomes from 53 individuals with painful, radiographically-confirmed knee osteoarthritis. The walking-related outcomes were obtained using equipment both from the research laboratory and the clinical setting. We used logistic regression to generate predictive models to determine candidate variables associated with a reduction in the knee adduction moment during walking - a surrogate for tibiofemoral load distribution, and a known biomechanical risk factor for osteoarthritis progression - with the use of standalone and arch-supported lateral wedge insoles. Three different response thresholds (2%, 6%, and 10% reductions in the knee adduction moment) were used.

RESULTS

In general, biomechanical responders were those who walked faster, were female, had less varus alignment, and had less severe radiographic severity. Findings were similar between the standalone and arch-supported lateral wedge insoles, as well as between models using the laboratory-derived or clinically-available measures of walking performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our hypothesis-generating study provides valuable information that will inform future research into the efficient and effective use of lateral wedge insoles in the conservative management of knee osteoarthritis.

Chinese guidelines for the rehabilitation treatment of knee osteoarthritis: An CSPMR evidence-based practice guideline

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common degenerative joint disease in China, causing a huge economic burden on patients, families, and society. Standardized KOA rehabilitation treatment is an important means to prevent and treat the disease and promote the development of high-quality medical services. This guideline is updated on the basis of the 2016 and 2019 editions.

METHODS

Clinical questions regarding rehabilitation assessment and treatment were selected through clinical questions screening and deconstruction, and multiple rounds of Delphi questionnaire consultation. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as the theoretical framework, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method was used to grade the quality of evidence and recommendations.

RESULTS

The reporting of this guideline followed the standard of Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT). Taking into account patients' preferences and values and the needs of Chinese clinical practice, a total of 11 clinical questions and 28 recommendations were established. The clinical questions were grouped into two categories: KOA assessment (body function, body structure, activity and participation, quality of life, and environmental factors and clinical outcomes assessment, resulting in 9 recommendations) and KOA treatment (health education, therapeutic exercise, therapeutic modalities, occupational therapy, assistive devices, and regenerative rehabilitation approaches, resulting in 19 recommendations).

CONCLUSION

This is the first evidence-based guideline for KOA rehabilitation in China utilizing the ICF framework. This guideline provides key guidance for developing systematic, standardized, and precise rehabilitation protocols for KOA across various healthcare settings.

Exploring the modification factors of exercise therapy on biomechanical load in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to clarify the effect of exercise therapy on the first peak knee adduction moment (KAM), as well as other biomechanical loads in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA), and identify physical characteristics that influence differences in biomechanical load after exercise therapy. The data sources are PubMed, PEDro, and CINAHL, from study inception to May 2021. The eligibility criteria include studies evaluating the first peak (KAM), peak knee flexion moment (KFM), maximal knee joint compression force (KCF), or co-contraction during walking before and after exercise therapy in patients with knee OA. The risk of bias was independently assessed by two reviewers using PEDro and NIH scales. Among 11 RCTs and nine non-RCTs, 1119 patients with knee OA were included (average age: 63.7 years). As the results of meta-analysis, exercise therapy tended to increase the first peak KAM (SMD 0.11; 95% CI: -0.03-0.24), peak KFM (SMD 0.13; 95% CI: -0.03-0.29), and maximal KCF (SMD 0.09; 95% CI -0.05-0.22). An increased first peak KAM was significantly associated with a larger improvement in knee muscle strength and WOMAC pain. However, the quality of evidence regarding the biomechanical loads was low-to-moderate according to the GRADE approach. The improvement in pain and knee muscle strength may mediate the increase in first peak KAM, suggesting difficulty in balancing symptom relief and biomechanical load reduction. Therefore, exercise therapy may satisfy both aspects simultaneously when combined with biomechanical interventions, such as a valgus knee brace or insoles. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021230966).

Walking with Different Insoles Changes Lower-Limb Biomechanics Globally in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis

Using insoles to modify walking biomechanics is of keen interest for the treatment of medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis. So far, insole interventions have focused on reducing the peak of the knee adduction moment (pKAM) and have led to inconsistent clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the changes in other gait variables related to knee osteoarthritis when patients walk with different insoles to provide insights into the necessity to enlarge the biomechanical analyses to other variables. Walking trials were recorded for 10 patients in four insole conditions. Changes among conditions were computed for six gait variables, including the pKAM. The associations between the changes in pKAM and the changes in the other variables were also assessed individually. Walking with different insoles had noticeable effects on the six gait variables, with high heterogeneity among patients. For all variables, at least 36.67% of the changes were of medium-to-large effect size. The associations with the changes in pKAM varied among variables and patients. In conclusion, this study showed that varying the insole could globally influence ambulatory biomechanics and that limiting measurement to the pKAM could lead to an important loss of information. Beyond the consideration of additional gait variables, this study also encourages personalized interventions to address inter-patient variability.

The Effect of Lateral Wedge Insole on Gait Variability Assessed Using Wearable Sensors in Patients with Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

Background

Lateral thrust seen in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis can cause dynamic knee instability and poor postural control during gait cycles. A lateral wedge insole can reduce the lateral thrust and may have a favorable effect on gait variability, which in turn may indicate gait instability improves. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lateral wedge insole on gait variability in knee osteoarthritis patients.

Method

We involved 15 symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients who were provided with lateral wedge insole and 13 healthy asymptomatic volunteers as the control group. The gait variability was evaluated as the coefficient of variation of stride, stance, and swing duration based on acceleration monitoring using a wearable sensor. The lateral thrust was estimated as the lateral acceleration peak on the shank sensor. These measurements were performed without lateral wedge insole (baseline), immediately with lateral wedge insole (T0) at the initial office visit and one month after intervention (T1).

Result

Our data showed that the stance duration coefficient of variation and lateral thrust at T1 in the knee osteoarthritis group, were significantly decreased compared to the baseline values and these values were identical to those in the control group.

Conclusion

The lateral wedge insole reduces dynamic knee instability and could improve gait variability in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

A Study on the Effects of Lateral-Wedge Insoles on Plantar-Pressure Pattern for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Using the Wearable Sensing Insole

Patients with knee osteoarthritis have a unique plantar-pressure pattern during walking, and lateral-wedge insoles are one of the treatment options. Participants were randomly assigned to either the lateral-wedge insole group or the ordinary insole group. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and plantar-pressure test scores were evaluated at the baseline and at 20 weeks. Plantar pressure data were collected using a pressure insole with 89 sensing locations. In the ordinary insole group, the function and total WOMAC scores decreased significantly (function score, 24.8 (baseline) to 16.5 (week 20); total score, 34.9 (baseline) to 24.6 (week 20)). During walking, the transverse width of the center of pressure as a percentage of foot width (%Trans) significantly increased in the ordinary insole group (baseline, 6.3%; week 20, 14.8%). In addition, the values of partial foot pressure as a percentage of body weight (%PFP) on the forefoot (baseline, 30.3%; week 20, 39.2%) and heel (baseline, 28.1%; week 20, 16.9%) also increased significantly in the ordinary insole group. Significant group-by-time interaction effects were observed for partial foot pressure per body weight in the forefoot (p = 0.031) and heel (p = 0.024). In the ordinary insole group, the plantar pressure on the heel significantly decreased (p = 0.011) and that on the forefoot significantly increased (p = 0.023). In contrast, plantar pressure remained stable in all regions in the lateral-wedge insole group. Thus, lateral-wedge insoles may protect against plantar pressure deterioration in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

The effect of biomechanical foot-based interventions on patellofemoral joint loads during gait in adults with and without patellofemoral pain or osteoarthritis: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral pain is highly prevalent across the lifespan, and a significant proportion of people report unfavourable outcomes years after diagnosis. Previous research has implicated patellofemoral joint loading during gait in patellofemoral pain and its sequelae, patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Biomechanical foot-based interventions (e.g., footwear, insoles, orthotics, taping or bracing) can alter patellofemoral joint loads by reducing motions at the foot that increase compression between the patella and underlying femur via coupling mechanisms, making them a promising treatment option. This systematic review will summarise the evidence about the effect of biomechanical foot-based interventions on patellofemoral joint loads during gait in adults with and without patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature CINAHL, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), SPORTdiscus (EBSCO) and Embase (Ovid) will be searched. Our search strategy will include terms related to 'patellofemoral joint', 'loads' and 'biomechanical foot-based interventions'. We will include studies published in the English language that assess the effect of biomechanical foot-based interventions on patellofemoral joint loads, quantified by patellofemoral joint pressure, patellofemoral joint reaction force and/or knee flexion moment. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, complete full-text reviews, and extract data from included studies. Two reviewers will assess study quality using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2) tool or the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. We will provide a synthesis of the included studies' characteristics and results. If three or more studies are sufficiently similar in population and intervention, we will pool the data to conduct a meta-analysis and report findings as standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. If a meta-analysis cannot be performed, we will conduct a narrative synthesis of the results and produce forest plots for individual studies.

DISCUSSION

This protocol outlines the methods of a systematic review that will determine the effect of biomechanical foot-based interventions on patellofemoral joint loads. Our findings will inform clinical practice by identifying biomechanical foot-based interventions that reduce or increase patellofemoral joint loads, which may aid the treatment of adults with patellofemoral pain and osteoarthritis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered with PROSPERO on the 4th of May 2022 (CRD42022315207).

The impact of ankle-foot orthosis's plantarflexion resistance on knee adduction moment in people with chronic stroke

BACKGROUND

An ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is used to assist gait of people with chronic stroke. It is widely accepted that AFO's plantarflexion resistance affects sagittal knee moments during their gait. However, its effect on the coronal knee moment remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of varying articulated AFO's plantarflexion resistance on knee adduction moment in people with chronic stroke.

METHODS

Ten people with chronic stroke participated in this study. Gait performance was measured using a Vicon 3-dimensional motion capture system and a Bertec split-belt instrumented treadmill. The participants walked on the treadmill wearing an articulated AFO whose plantarflexion resistance could be systematically adjusted. The ankle joints were set to four distinct levels of plantarflexion resistance (S1 < S2 < S3 < S4). The coronal ankle and knee joint moment, center of pressure, and ground reaction force were analyzed using Visual3D.

RESULTS

The external knee adduction moment increased significantly ( P < .001) and the position of the center of pressure trajectory shifted significantly ( P = .003) in the medial direction as the plantarflexion resistance of the AFO was increased from the least resistive condition (S1) to the most resistive condition (S4). The maximum knee adduction moment (median [interquartile range]) was S1: 0.097 (-0.012 to 0.265) Nm/kg; S2: 0.136 (0.040 to 0.287) Nm/kg; S3: 0.160 (0.465 to 0.289) Nm/kg; and S4: 0.192 (0.080 to 0.288) Nm/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that varying AFO's plantarflexion resistance altered the knee adduction moment, likely by altering the center of pressure trajectory while walking, in people with chronic stroke.

Comparison of Lower Extremity Joint Moment and Power Estimated by Markerless and Marker-Based Systems during Treadmill Running

Background: Markerless (ML) motion capture systems have recently become available for biomechanics applications. Evidence has indicated the potential feasibility of using an ML system to analyze lower extremity kinematics. However, no research has examined ML systems’ estimation of the lower extremity joint moments and powers. This study aimed to compare lower extremity joint moments and powers estimated by marker-based (MB) and ML motion capture systems. Methods: Sixteen volunteers ran on a treadmill for 120 s at 3.58 m/s. The kinematic data were simultaneously recorded by 8 infrared cameras and 8 high-resolution video cameras. The force data were recorded via an instrumented treadmill. Results: Greater peak magnitudes for hip extension and flexion moments, knee flexion moment, and ankle plantarflexion moment, along with their joint powers, were observed in the ML system compared to an MB system (p < 0.0001). For example, greater hip extension (MB: 1.42 ± 0.29 vs. ML: 2.27 ± 0.45) and knee flexion (MB: −0.74 vs. ML: −1.17 nm/kg) moments were observed in the late swing phase. Additionally, the ML system’s estimations resulted in significantly smaller peak magnitudes for knee extension moment, along with the knee production power (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: These observations indicate that inconsistent estimates of joint center position and segment center of mass between the two systems may cause differences in the lower extremity joint moments and powers. However, with the progression of pose estimation in the markerless system, future applications can be promising.

Knee adduction moment is correlated with the increase in medial meniscus extrusion by dynamic ultrasound in knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

An increase in medial meniscus extrusion (MME) due to abnormal biomechanical stress leads to knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression. MME evaluation during walking is a key method of detecting dynamic changes in the meniscus, and in combination with motion analysis, can provide a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in the increase of MME.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the feasibility of MME dynamic evaluation in combination with a motion analysis system based on the correlation between the increase in MME and biomechanical factors.

METHODS

Twenty-three knees from 23 patients with mild to moderate knee OA were analysed in this study. The medial meniscus during walking was evaluated by ultrasound. The increase in MME was calculated as the difference between the minimum and maximum MME during walking. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was synchronised with the ultrasound and then, biomechanical factors such as knee moment and ground reaction force were evaluated.

RESULTS

The wave patterns of the mediolateral and vertical components of ground reaction forces and knee adduction moment were similar to those in the MME based on a high cross-correlation coefficient (>0.8). The increase in MME was significantly correlated with the peak value of the knee adduction moment (r = 0.54, P = 0.0073) but not with the mediolateral and vertical components of the ground reaction force.

CONCLUSION

The findings show that knee adduction moment is correlated with an increase in MME during walking and indicates the validity and feasibility of the dynamic evaluation of MME in combination with a motion analysis system.

Impact of in shoe and barefoot placed frontal wedges on plantar loading: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The main aim of this review is to report the effect of different types of in-shoe and barefoot wedges on the distribution of the plantar loading of the human foot. We hypothesise that frontal plane wedges modify this parameter.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, using the PubMed, CINAHL, Prospero and Scopus databases, consulted from their date of first publication to May 2020. Only observational (cross-over studies), randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies addressing the effects of in-shoe and barefoot frontal plane wedges on plantar loading were included. All articles were subjected to quality assessment, using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the observational (cross-over) studies, TREND for quasi-experimental studies and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for the RCTs.

RESULTS

Eleven papers were included in the final review. Four were cross-over studies, other four were quasi-experimental studies and three were RCTs. These eleven studies included 320 patients, with ages ranging from 20 to 60 years. Regarding the risk of bias, most of the observational studies and RCTs had a moderate level of quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that lateral wedges are more effective, producing a lateral shift of the centre of pressure and increasing the pressure. Regarding the impact on the peak impact force there seems to be less consensus among the published data.

The effect of arch-support insole on knee kinematics and kinetics during a stop-jump maneuver

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament injuries commonly occur during sports that involve sudden stops or direction changes. Although athletes often use arch-support insoles in competition and training, little is known about the effect of foot insoles on knee biomechanics and jump take-off performances.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of arch-support insoles on knee kinematics and kinetics during the stop-braking phase and the subsequent jump take-off performances.

STUDY DESIGN

That is a quasi-experimental study, repeated-measures design.

METHODS

Twenty male healthy recreational university basketball athletes performed stop-jump with maximum effort in both arch-support and flat insole conditions. Paired t -tests were performed on knee kinetics and kinematics and jump performance variables to determine whether there were significant differences between insole conditions.

RESULTS

Wearing arch-support insoles experienced larger ground reaction forces (GRFs), loading rates of peak vertical and posterior GRFs, peak knee adduction and rotation moments, and knee flexion angular velocity than the flat insoles ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased GRFs and knee loading in arch-support insoles are indicative of a higher risk of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. The findings could be insightful to the knee mechanics that are related to performance and injury potential during stop-jump maneuvers.

Dynamic response of medial meniscus extrusion to the lateral wedge insole is correlated with immediate pain reduction in knee osteoarthritis patients: real-time ultrasonographic study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of lateral wedge insole (LWI) on medial meniscus extrusion (MME) observed during dynamic evaluation with ultrasound and its correlation with the alteration in knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

This cohort study included 25 participants with knee OA. The medial meniscus was imaged during walking in video mode using ultrasonography. The degree of increase in MME (ΔMME) was calculated as the difference in the value of the maximum and minimum MME. The intensity of knee pain was evaluated immediately after the walking trial using the visual analogue scale (VAS). These measurements were performed with and without the LWI. The participants were categorised into the responder group, which was identified by the constant reduction in the VAS, and the non-responder group.

RESULTS

MME, ΔMME, and knee pain during walking were significantly lower with the LWI than without the LWI (p < 0.01). The reduction in ΔMME with the LWI in the responder group was significantly higher than that in the non-responder group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that MME and knee pain during walking decreased with LWI use, especially in patients whose reduction in knee pain was characterised by inhibition in the increase in MME observed during dynamic evaluation with ultrasound.

Osteoarthritis of the Knee in Middle-age Athletes: Many Measures are Practiced, but Lack Sound Scientific Evidence

Osteoarthritis of the knee generally affects individuals from the fifth decade, the typical age of middle-age athletes. In the early stages, management is conservative and multidisciplinary. It is advisable to avoid sports with high risk of trauma, but it is important that patients continue to be physically active. Conservative management offers several options; however, it is unclear which ones are really useful. This narrative review briefly reports the conservative options for which there is no evidence of effectiveness, or there is only evidence of short-term effectiveness.

Conservative Trio-Therapy for Varus Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Case-Study

Background and Objectives: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent cause of pain, functional limitations, and a common reason for surgical treatment, such as joint replacement. Conservative therapies can reduce pain and improve function; thus, delaying or even preventing surgical intervention. Various individual conservative therapies show benefits, but combination therapies remain underexplored. The aim of this prospective case-study was to assess the effect of a conservative combination therapy in patients with painful varus knee OA. Materials and Methods: With strong inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine patients with painful varus knee OA (mean age 56 years (range 51−63 years) were selected and monitored over six months, using the following clinical outcome scores: pain visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC score), short-form−36 items (SF-36) quality of life score, and the sports frequency score. All patients received a standardized conservative trio-therapy with varus-reducing hindfoot shoe-insoles with a lateral hindfoot wedge, oral viscosupplementation, and physiotherapy for six months. Results: The pain was reduced significantly from initial VAS values of 5.4 points (range, 3−10) to values of 0.6 points (range, 0−3; p < 0.01), at the end of treatment. After six months, seven out of nine patients reported no pain at all (VAS 0). The WOMAC score improved significantly, from initial values of 35 (range, 10−56) to values of 2 (range, 0−9; p < 0.01). The SF-36 score showed significant improvement after six months in all four domains of physical health (p < 0.01) and in two of the four domains of mental health (p < 0.05). The sports frequency score increased by at least one level in six out of nine patients after six months. Conclusions: The conservative trio-therapy in patients with varus knee OA showed positive initial clinical results: less pain, higher function, better quality of life, and higher sport activity. Further studies are required to evaluate the long-term effect.

Influence of using knee sleeve and lateral wedge insole on knee loading among healthy individuals during stair negotiation

BACKGROUND

For individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA), stair negotiation is a challenging task and the first task during which they report pain due to the high knee loading required. The use of lateral wedge insole (LWI) has been found to reduce loading in patients with OA but not to reduce pain, whereas the use of knee sleeve has been shown to result in good pain reduction. Understanding the effect of combining LWI and knee sleeve use on healthy individuals before testing on individuals with knee OA is an important step.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of combining the use of LWI and knee sleeve and compare the results with the application of each treatment separately and with the control condition.

METHODS

This randomised cross-over study included 17 healthy participants who underwent 3D gait analysis. Participants performed ascending and descending stair activities with the following four treatment conditions: five-degree LWI, off-the-shelf knee sleeve, both LWI and knee sleeve and control condition. External knee adduction moment (EKAM) and knee frontal plane range of motion (ROM) were evaluated as primary outcomes. Repeated measure ANOVA or the Friedman test was selected based on meeting the assumption followed by multiple pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

In general, the use of LWI reduced the first peak EKAM significantly (p < 0.001) compared to the control condition in stir ascending (12% reduction) but not in stair descending (p > 0.05). Interestingly, knee sleeve use did not result in any reduction in the first peak EKAM compared to the control or any other condition. However, knee sleeve use led to a significant reduction in the knee frontal plane ROM during stair descending. The combined treatment was not superior to the LWI use when compared to control in the EKAM reduction.

SIGNIFICANCE

Combined knee sleeve and LWI use was not superior to LWI use alone in reducing the knee loading, but it may be beneficial for individuals with knee OA since it helped in reduction of the knee frontal plane ROM during stair descending. Importantly, the effect of LWI use or any other treatment must be investigated for each different activity, and the results found in one activity must not be generalised across other activities.

An exploration of changes in plantar pressure distributions during walking with standalone and supported lateral wedge insole designs

BACKGROUND

Lateral wedge insoles (LWI), standalone or with medial arch support (supported-LWI), have been thoroughly investigated for their effects on modifying gait biomechanics for people with knee osteoarthritis. However, plantar pressure distribution between these insole types has not been investigated and could provide insight towards insole prescription with concomitant foot symptoms taken into consideration.

METHODS

In a sample of healthy individuals (n = 40), in-shoe plantar pressure was measured during walking with LWI, with or without medial arch support (variable- and uniform-stiffness designs), and a flat control insole condition. Pressure data from the plantar surface of the foot were divided into seven regions: medial/lateral rearfoot, midfoot, medial/central/lateral forefoot, hallux. Plantar pressure outcomes assessed were the medial-lateral pressure index (MLPI) for the whole foot, and the peak pressure, pressure-time integral (PTI), and contact area in each plantar region. Comfort in each insole condition was rated as a change relative to the flat control insole condition. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were calculated to compare the plantar pressure outcomes between insole conditions.

RESULTS

Regionally, medial rearfoot and forefoot pressure were reduced by all wedged insoles, with the variable-stiffness supported-wedge showing greater reductions than the standalone wedge. Lateral rearfoot and forefoot pressure were reduced by both supported-LWI, but unchanged by the standalone wedge. In the midfoot, the standalone wedge maintained pressure but reduced regional contact area, while both supported-LWI increased midfoot pressure and contact area. All LWI increased the MLPI, indicating a lateral shift in plantar pressure distribution throughout the weightbearing phase of gait. Comfort ratings were not significantly different between insole conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional differences in plantar pressure may help determine an appropriate lateral wedge insole variation to avoid exacerbation of concomitant foot symptoms by minimizing pressure in symptomatic regions. Lateral shifts in plantar pressure distribution were observed in all laterally wedged conditions, including one supported-LWI that was previously shown to be biomechanically ineffective for modifying knee joint load distribution. Thus, shifts in foot centre of pressure may not be a primary mechanism by which LWI can modify knee joint load distribution for people with knee osteoarthritis.

Stepping Back to Minimal Footwear: Applications Across the Lifespan

Minimal footwear has existed for tens of thousands of years and was originally designed to protect the sole of the foot. Over the past 50 yr, most footwear has become increasingly more cushioned and supportive. Here, we review evidence that minimal shoes are a better match to our feet, which may result in a lower risk of musculoskeletal injury.

Association between changes in the knee adduction moment and changes in knee pain and function in response to non-surgical biomechanical interventions for medial knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

There is lack of understanding of the relationship between knee adduction moment (KAM) reductions and improvements in pain or function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Moreover, there is no systematic review describing the longitudinal relationship between KAM changes and subsequent changes in pain and/or physical function. We aimed (1) to investigate the relationship between changes in KAM induced by non-surgical biomechanical interventions and consecutive changes in pain and/or physical function in patients with medial KOA and (2) to compare this relationship for different interventions. We considered eligible all RCTs using biomechanical interventions aimed to reduce KAM in KOA patients, that measured pain/function. We used Cohen's d effect size to quantify outcome measurements. 14 papers reporting 11 studies were identified. Braces were tested in 6 studies, insoles in 5 studies, shoes in 3 studies and gait retraining in 2 studies. Methodological differences were large among studies. Large effect sizes (≥0.8) changes in pain/function were observed with interventions having at least a small KAM effect size (≥0.2), suggesting an association between KAM and pain/function changes. A linear trend was observed between inter-intervention KAM and VAS pain effect sizes, based on 4 studies. No firm conclusions could be drawn for the different intervention types. There was a trend toward larger KAM reductions leading to larger improvements in pain/function in non-surgical biomechanical interventions. Additional high-quality RCT with consistent methodology are needed to fully characterize the association between KAM and pain/function changes.

Inflammatory factors are crucial for the pathogenesis of post-traumatic osteoarthritis confirmed by a novel porcine model: "Idealized" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction" and gait analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether idealized anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (IACL-R) restores normal gait features, and whether inflammatory factors are involved in the pathogenesisof post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA).

METHODS

Fourteen mature female minipigs were allocated to a sham group (n = 7) or an IACL-R group (n = 7). Load asymmetry during gait was recorded using a pressure-sensing walkway measurement system to evaluate the gait features of the right knee joint before and after surgery. Inflammatory factors (including interleukin [IL]-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) in synovial fluid were measured using Luminex assays before and after surgery. Cartilage integrity and the subchondral bone plate of the right knee were evaluated using histology and imaging at 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Swing time and stance time returned to their preoperative values on day 31, while maximum force, contact area, peak force ,and impulse returned to their preoperative values on day 45 after the surgery in the IACL-R group (P = 0.073, 0.053, 0.107, 0.052, 0.152, and 0.059, respectively).Thus, IACL-R restored normal gait. Compared with their preoperative concentrations, all tested inflammatory factors showed significantly increased concentrations in the synovial fluid in the IACL-R group, especially at 3, 7, and 15 days postoperatively. X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and histological data showed severe cartilage damage in the IACL-R model.

CONCLUSION

IACL-R restored normal gait features but caused significant cartilage damage, indicating that significantly elevated inflammatory factors maybe crucial for the pathogenesis of PTOA.

Influence of foot posture on immediate biomechanical responses during walking to variable-stiffness supported lateral wedge insole designs

BACKGROUND

Novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support can alter walking biomechanics as a conservative treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. However, variations in foot posture may influence individual responses to insole intervention and these effects are not yet known.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does foot posture influence biomechanical responses to novel designs of lateral wedge insoles with arch support?

METHODS

This exploratory biomechanical investigation categorized forty healthy volunteers (age 23-34) into pronated (n = 16), neutral (n = 15), and supinated (n = 9) foot posture groups based on the Foot Posture Index. Three-dimensional gait analysis was conducted during walking with six orthotic insole conditions: flat control, lateral wedge, uniform-stiffness arch support, variable-stiffness arch support, and lateral wedge + each arch support. Frontal plane knee and ankle/subtalar joint kinetic and kinematic outcomes were compared among insole conditions and foot posture groups using a repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The lateral wedge alone and lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support were the only insole conditions effective at reducing the knee adduction moment. However, the lateral wedge + variable-stiffness arch support had a smaller increase in peak ankle/subtalar eversion moment than the lateral wedge alone. Supinated feet had smaller ankle/subtalar eversion excursion and moment impulse than neutral and pronated feet, across all insole conditions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Supinated feet have less mobile ankle/subtalar joints than neutral and pronated feet and, as a result, may be less likely to respond to biomechanical intervention from orthotic insoles. Supported lateral wedge insoles incorporating an arch support design that is variable-stiffness may be better than uniform-stiffness since reductions in the knee adduction moment can be achieved while minimizing increases in the ankle/subtalar eversion moment.

How foot progression angle affects knee adduction moment and angular impulse in people with and without medial knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of foot progression angle (FPA) modification on the first and second peaks of external knee adduction moment (EKAM) and knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI) in individuals with and without medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) during level walking.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and SPORTDiscus were searched from inception to February 2020 by two independent reviewers. Included studies compared FPA modification (toe-in or toe-out gait) interventions to lower EKAM and/or KAAI with natural walking. Studies were required to report the first or second peaks of EKAM or KAAI.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included and more than 85% of included patients were graded with Kellgren-Lawrence II-IV knee OA. Toe-in gait reduced the first EKAM peak (standard mean difference (SMD): -0.75; 95%CI: -1.05~-0.45) and KAAI (SMD: -0.46; 95%CI: -0.86~-0.07), while toe-out gait reduced the second EKAM peak (SMD: -1.04; 95%CI: -1.34~-0.75) in healthy individuals. For patients with knee OA, toe-out gait reduced the second EKAM peak (SMD: -0.53; 95%CI: -0.75~-0.31) and KAAI (SMD: -0.26; 95%CI: -0.49~-0.03) while toe-in gait did not affect both EKAM peaks and KAAI.

CONCLUSION

Discrepancy in biomechanical effects of FPA modification was demonstrated between individuals with and without medial knee OA. Compared with natural walking, both toe-in and toe-out gait may be more effective in lowering EKAM and KAAI in healthy individuals. Toe-out gait may reduce EKAM and KAAI in patients with mild to severe knee OA. There is insufficient data from patients with early-stage knee OA, indicating future research is required.

The effect of treatment with a non-invasive foot worn biomechanical device on subjective and objective measures in patients with knee osteoarthritis- a retrospective analysis on a UK population

Background

Osteoarthritis is a major cause of pain and disability worldwide, therefore ways of treating this condition are paramount to a successful health system. The purpose of the study was to investigate the changes in spatial-temporal gait parameters and clinical measurements following treatment with a non-invasive foot-worn biomechanical device on patients with knee osteoarthritis within the UK.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was carried out on 455 patients with knee osteoarthritis. All patients were evaluated using a computerized gait test and two self-assessment questionnaires (WOMAC and SF-36) at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. The biomechanical device is a shoe-like device with convex pods under the sole that have the capability of changing foot centre of pressure and training neuromuscular control. The device was individually calibrated for each patient to minimise symptoms whilst walking and train neuromuscular control. Patients used the device for short periods during activities of daily living. Repeated measures statistical analyses were performed to compare differences over time.

Results

After 6 months of treatment significant improvements were seen in all gait parameters (p < 0.01). Specifically, gait velocity, step length and single limb support of the more symptomatic knee improved by 13, 7.8 and 3%, respectively. These were supported by significant improvements in pain, function and quality of life (48.6, 45.7 and 22% respectively; p < 0.001). A sub-group analysis revealed no baseline differences between those who were recommended joint replacement and those who were not. Both groups improved significantly over time (p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the personalised biomechanical treatment can improve gait patterns, pain, function and quality of life. It may provide an additional solution to managing UK patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis but needs to be tested in a controlled setting first.

Changes in ambulatory knee adduction moment with lateral wedge insoles differ with respect to the natural foot progression angle

Lateral wedge insoles (LWI) have been proposed to reduce the knee adduction moment (KAM) during walking; a biomechanical modification notably sought in case of medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the inter-individual inconsistency in KAM changes with LWI limits their therapeutic use. Although the foot progression angle (FPA) has been frequently discussed in KAM modifications literature, there is a lack of data regarding a possible relationship between this gait measure and changes in KAM with LWI. This study aimed to test if KAM changes with LWI differ with respect to the natural FPA and to compare KAM-related variables between individuals walking with smaller and larger natural FPA. Twenty-two healthy participants (14 males, 24 ± 3 years, 22.7 ± 2.7 kg/m²) underwent gait analysis with and without LWI. They were divided into two groups based on their natural FPA, and changes in KAM 1st peak, KAM impulse, and KAM-related variables were compared between groups. KAM 1st peak and impulse decreased with LWI in the smaller natural FPA group (p ≤ 0.006), while only KAM impulse decreased in the larger natural FPA group (p < 0.001). The difference in KAM 1st peak changes was explained by a less reduced lever arm in participants walking with larger natural FPA. In conclusion, this study brought new insight into the variability in KAM response to LWI. If the findings are confirmed in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis, the FPA could become a simple measure to help identify the patients more likely to reduce their KAM with LWI.

Footwear for osteoarthritis of the lateral knee: protocol for the FOLK randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Structural features of lateral tibiofemoral (TF) joint osteoarthritis (OA) occur in up to half of all people with knee OA, and co-existing lateral TF OA is associated with worse knee pain in people with mixed compartmental knee OA. Clinical guidelines for management of knee OA advocate advice about appropriate footwear, yet there is no research evaluating which types of footwear are best for managing pain associated with lateral TF OA. Biomechanical evidence suggests that "motion-control" footwear, which possess midsoles that are stiffer medially compared to laterally, may shift load away from the lateral compartment of the knee and thus may reduce knee pain associated with lateral TF OA. The primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of motion-control shoes to neutral shoes on knee pain in people with predominantly lateral TF OA.

METHODS

This will be an assessor- and participant-blinded, two-arm, comparative effectiveness randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in Melbourne, Australia. We will recruit a minimum of 92 people with painful lateral TF OA from the community. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either motion-control shoes or neutral shoes and will be instructed to wear their allocated shoes for a minimum of 6 h per day for 6 months. The primary outcome is change in self-reported knee pain on walking, measured using a numerical rating scale, assessed at baseline and 6 months. Secondary outcomes include other measures of knee pain, physical function, quality of life, participant-perceived change in pain and function, and physical activity levels.

DISCUSSION

This study will compare the efficacy of motion-control shoes to neutral shoes for people with painful lateral TF OA. Findings will be the first to provide evidence of the effects of footwear on knee pain in this important subgroup of people with knee OA and allow clinicians to provide accurate advice about the most appropriate footwear for managing pain associated with lateral TF OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial has been prospectively registered by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 15/11/2018 (reference: ACTRN12618001864213).

The effect of a lateral wedge insole and a subtalar strap on gait parameters in knee osteoarthritis

Background: Lateral wedge insole (LWI) aims to reduce loading on medial compartment of tibiofemoral joint in mild knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This effect may be augmented by concomitant use of subtalar strap to fix the ankle joint. Moreover, longitudinal arch support embedded in insoles can cause foot comfort and may be beneficial for people with KOA. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the immediate effect of LWI with an arch support with and without a subtalar strap on the kinetics and kinematics of walking in mild KOA.

Methods: A convenient sample of 17 individuals with mild KOA (Kellgren and Lawrence grade II), aged ≥ 40 years were assessed in 3 conditions: without the insole; LWI; and LWI with a subtalar strap, where an arch support was embedded in all insoles. The primary outcomes were external knee adduction moment and angular impulse. The secondary outcomes were hip flexion and adduction moments, knee flexion angle, ankle eversion moment, and walking speed. The repeated measurements ANOVA was used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes between the conditions using SPSS. Significance level was set at 0.05.

Results: LWI and a subtalar strap can significantly increase the knee flexion angle at 0%-15% of the stance phase compared to no insole (p<0.001). No other changes were observed (p=0.142).

Conclusion: LWI with an arch, with or without a subtalar strap, cannot impose any immediate changes on the kinetics and kinematics of lower limb joints during walking in people with mild KOA.

Does Gait Retraining Have the Potential to Reduce Medial Compartmental Loading in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis While Not Adversely Affecting the Other Lower Limb Joints? A Systematic Review

Objectives

To review the literature regarding gait retraining to reduce knee adduction moments and their effects on hip and ankle biomechanics.

Data Sources

Twelve academic databases were searched from inception to January 2019. Key words “walk*” OR “gait,” “knee” OR “adduction moment,” “osteoarthriti*” OR “arthriti*” OR “osteo arthriti*” OR “OA,” and “hip” OR “ankle” were combined with conjunction “and” in all fields.

Study Selection

Abstracts and full-text articles were assessed by 2 individuals against a predefined criterion.

Data Synthesis

Of the 11 studies, sample sizes varied from 8-40 participants. Eight different gait retraining styles were evaluated: hip internal rotation, lateral trunk lean, toe-in, toe-out, increased step width, medial thrust, contralateral pelvic drop, and medial foot weight transfer. Using the Black and Downs tool, the methodological quality of the included studies was fair to moderate ranging between 12 of 25 to 18 of 28. Trunk lean and medial thrust produced the biggest reductions in first peak knee adduction moment. Studies lacked collective sagittal and frontal plane hip and ankle joint biomechanics. Generally, studies had a low sample size of healthy participants with no osteoarthritis and assessed gait retraining during 1 laboratory visit while not documenting the difficulty of the gait retraining style.

Conclusions

Gait retraining techniques may reduce knee joint loading; however, the biomechanical effects to the pelvis, hip, and ankle is unknown, and there is a lack of understanding for the ease of application of the gait retraining styles.

The wedge insole for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Functional limitations and pain are common presenting complaints for people suffering from knee osteoarthritis. Wedge insole can be sued for treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explicit the efficacy of wedge insole in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for studies will be performed in MEDLINE, Embase, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Cochrane Library, Web of Science. The methodological quality of the included studies using the risk bias assessment tool of Cochrane. Funnel plot will be used to assess the reporting bias. And the level of evidence for results are assessed by the GRADE method. Statistical analysis is conducted with Revman 5.3.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a synthesis of evidences for wedge insole on knee osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion of this study will provide recommendations to assess effectiveness of exercise on knee osteoarthritis, which may further guide clinical practice.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018096804.

Anatomical Adaptation of Fibula and its Mechanism of Proximal Partial Fibulectomy Associated with Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

Objectives

To reveal the anatomical adaptation of the fibula and its relations to age and settlement of the medial tibial plateau, and to explore the mechanism of proximal partial fibulectomy in treating medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A retrospective study was performed in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Weight‐bearing full‐leg anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of 280 adults (560 knees) obtained from 1 January 2018 to 31 October 2018 were enrolled according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 157 men and 123 women, with an average age of 50.3 ± 14.8 years (range, 19–80 years). Radiographic severity of knee OA was assessed using Kellgren and Lawrence (K–L) grading. The settlement of the medial tibial plateau was evaluated using the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Curvatures of the tibia and the fibula were measured as proximal tibial curvature (PTC), distal tibial curvature (DTC), proximal fibular curvature (PFC), and distal fibular curvature (DFC). Two orthopaedic surgeons performed all the radiological measurements for 30 randomly selected patients, and repeated the measurements 1 week later. Based on the satisfactory intra‐observer and inter‐observer reliabilities (ICC > 0.9), each parameter was analyzed in this study. Multivariable linear regression models were used to examine relations between radiological measurements and age.

Results

The mean MPTA, PTC, DTC, PFC, and DFC were 85.4° ± 2.8°, 176.2° ± 1.9°, 176.8° ± 1.8°, 176.8° ± 1.9°, and 177.0° ± 2.0°, respectively. Ninety‐three knees of K–L grade I were categorized as non‐knee OA, and 467 knees of K–L grades II–IV were categorized as knee OA. The MPTA, PTC, and PFC of the knee OA group were significantly smaller than those of non‐knee OA group (P < 0.05). The K–L grade of knee OA significantly increased with age (χ² = 182.169, P < 0.01). The multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that the MPTA and fibular curvatures were negatively correlated with age (the regression equation is age = 561.165–0.945 MPTA‐0.937 PFC‐0.959 DFC, P < 0.05), and the MPTA was negatively correlated with PFC (the regression equation is MPTA = 7.827 + 0.099 DFC, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The proximal curve of the fibula increased in patients with medial compartment knee OA, and this change was positively correlated with age and settlement of the medial tibial plateau. This anatomical adaptation of the fibula was associated with greater fibular axial load and the pulling from the peroneus longus. The proximal partial fibulectomy procedure effected a receptive foot pronation to reduce KAM and rebalance the biceps‐proximal fibula–peroneus longus complex, consequently achieving medial compartment unloading.

Effects of foot pronation on the lower limb sagittal plane biomechanics during gait

BACKGROUND

Increased foot pronation may compromise ankle plantarflexion moment during the stance phase of gait, which may overload knee and hip.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study investigated the influence of increased foot pronation on lower limbs angular displacement, internal moments and power in the sagittal plane and ground reaction force and center of pressure displacement during the stance phase of gait.

METHODS

Kinematic and kinetic data of 22 participants (10 women and 12 men) were collected while they walked wearing flat (control condition) and laterally wedged sandals to induce foot pronation (inclined condition). We used principal component analysis for data reduction and dependent t-test to compare differences between conditions with α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The inclined condition increased forefoot range of motion (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.73); increased ankle plantarflexion angle (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.96); reduced ankle plantarflexion moment in mid and terminal stance phases and delayed and increased ankle plantarflexion moment in late stance (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.72); increased range of ankle power during late stance (p = 0.006; effect size = 0.56); reduced knee range of moment (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.76); increased range of knee power in early stance and reduced knee power generation in late stance (p = 0.005; effect size = 0.56); reduced the anterior displacement of the center of pressure (p < 0.001; effect size = 0.82) and increased the ground reaction force in the anterior direction (p = 0.003; effect size = 0.60).

SIGNIFICANCE

Increased foot pronation compromises lower limb mechanics in the sagittal plane during the stance phase of gait. These findings are explained by the fact that foot pronation increases foot segments flexibility and compromises foot lever arm function during the stance of gait.

Is the Wedged Insole an Effective Treatment Option When Compared with a Flat (Placebo) Insole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Using the lateral wedge insole is a conservative management strategy for knee osteoarthritis. The theoretical basis for this intervention is to correct femorotibial angle, thereby reducing pain and optimising function.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effectiveness of wedge insole compared with flat insole for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, searching published (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and unpublished literature from their inception to April 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of wedge insole with a flat insole were included. Risk of bias and clinical relevance were assessed, and outcomes were analysed through meta-analysis.

RESULT

From a total of 413 citations, 8 studies adhered to the a priori eligibility criteria. The WOMAC pain was shown to be statistically nonsignificant change with the use of wedge insole (SMD=0.07), and low heterogeneity (I2=22%) and a 95% CI that crossed zero (95% CI: -0.09 to 0.24). The 5 independent trials were not significant in improving pain score (SMD = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.16). This review also revealed no significance in improving Lequesne index (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.19). The meta-analysis from the 2 independent trials was significant in improving femorotibial angle (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.09). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that lateral wedge insoles can improve femorotibial angle but are of no benefit with pain and functions in knee osteoarthritis.