Esposito J, Masson F. [Ambulatory anesthesia practice in a University Hospital Center: what is done; what could be done. Ambulatory Anesthesia Study Group].
ANNALES FRANCAISES D'ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION 1998;
16:866-72. [PMID:
9750616 DOI:
10.1016/s0750-7658(97)89835-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To estimate the number and type of patients, who could be managed on a day-care basis in a University Hospital. Cases of ambulatory anaesthesia (AA) which could be managed in optimal conditions and current AA practice. To assess patients' opinion on inpatient or outpatient practices.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective survey over 8 weeks in 21 medical units potentially concerned by ambulatory practice.
PATIENTS
Series of 1,396 patients undergoing an operation included in a previously established list of outpatient procedures.
METHOD
A questionnaire was completed for each patient, from preoperative anaesthesia consultation until discharge. Thereafter patients were contacted after home discharge by telephone or mail.
RESULTS
In the group of the 1,396 selected patients, 301 (22%) were contra-indicated for AA. In optimal conditions AA was indicated in 20% of all patients treated in these units. At the time of the survey there were 285 outpatients (26% of potential AA, 5% of all patients). Complications were uncommon. Ninety-eight percent of them would choose day surgery again. Among the 810 inpatients, 279 responded: 53% would prefer to be an ambulatory patient.
CONCLUSION
At the time of this survey only one fourth of the possible oupatients for AA had in fact been treated on a day-case basis. Its development requires an improvement of the structures, team organisation and patients' information.
Collapse