Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity

Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.

Managing life-threatening 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), a known cardiotoxin, is the backbone for the treatment of colorectal cancer. It is associated with arrhythmias, myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. Most commonly, it is associated with coronary vasospasm secondary to direct toxic effects on vascular endothelium.A woman with metastatic colon cancer, originally treated with a 5-FU infusion as part of the FOLFIRI (Folinic acid, 5-Fluorouracil, Irinotecan) regimen, was unable to tolerate the chemotherapy due to chest pain. She was transitioned from infusional 5-FU to inferior 1-hour bolus 5-FU, in an attempt to minimise cardiotoxicity, but had disease progression. A multidisciplinary decision was made to again trial 5-FU infusion and pretreat with diltiazem. She tolerated chemotherapy without adverse events. A multidisciplinary discussion is recommended for co-management of reversible 5-FU-associated cardiotoxicity. After coronary artery disease (CAD) risk stratification and treatment, empiric treatment with calcium channel blockers and/or nitrates may allow patients with suspected coronary vasospasm, from 5-FU, to continue this vital chemotherapy.

The Role of Vasospasm and Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Fluoropyrimidine-Induced Ischemic Heart Disease

Cardiovascular diseases and cancer are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Cardiotoxicity from chemotherapeutic agents results in substantial morbidity and mortality in cancer survivors and patients with active cancer. Cardiotoxicity induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been well established, yet its incidence, mechanisms, and manifestation remain poorly defined. Ischemia secondary to coronary artery vasospasm is thought to be the most frequent cardiotoxic effect of 5-FU. The available evidence of 5-FU-induced epicardial coronary artery spasm and coronary microvascular dysfunction suggests that endothelial dysfunction or primary vascular smooth muscle dysfunction (an endothelial-independent mechanism) are the possible contributing factors to this form of cardiotoxicity. In patients with 5-FU-related coronary artery vasospasm, termination of chemotherapy and administration of nitrates or calcium channel blockers may improve ischemic symptoms. However, there are variable results after administration of nitrates or calcium channel blockers in patients treated with 5-FU presumed to have myocardial ischemia, suggesting mechanisms other than impaired vasodilatory response. Clinicians should investigate whether chest pain and ECG changes can reasonably be attributed to 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity. More prospective data and clinical randomized trials are required to understand and mitigate potentially adverse outcomes from 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity.

What the Cardiologist Needs to Consider in the Management of Oncologic Patients with STEMI-Like Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review

In pre-hospital care, an accurate and quick diagnosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is imperative to promptly kick-off the STEMI network with a direct transfer to the cardiac catheterization laboratory (cath lab) in order to reduce myocardial infarction size and mortality. Aa atherosclerotic plaque rupture is the main mechanism responsible for STEMI. However, in a small percentage of patients, emergency coronarography does not reveal any significant coronary stenosis. The fluoropyrimidine agents such as 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine, widely used to treat gastrointestinal, breast, head and neck cancers, either as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapies, can cause potentially lethal cardiac side effects. Here, we present the case of a patient with 5-FU cardiotoxicity resulting in an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with recurrent episodes of chest pain and ST-segment elevation.. Our case report highlights the importance of widening the knowledge among cardiologists of the side effects of chemotherapeutic drugs, especially considering the rising number of cancer patients around the world and that fluoropyrimidines are the main treatment for many types of cancer, both in adjuvant and advanced settings.

S1-induced vasospastic angina-diagnostic utility of Holter ECG: a report of a case

Background

Vasospastic angina is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse event (AE) of S1, an oral fluoropyrimidine anticancer agent. However, this AE is not well known owing to its low incidence. We report herein a case of a patient who suffered from vasospastic angina associated with S1 chemotherapy for unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma, along with a review of the literature.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old woman was endoscopically diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma of the diffuse type. Abdominal pelvic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed small nodules in the omentum and ascites in the pouch of Douglas. The patient was clinically diagnosed with unresectable gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis, and primary chemotherapy with S1 plus cisplatin was selected. Around midnight of day 1, the patient complained of sudden oppressive chest pain. The pain disappeared spontaneously after 3–5 min, but similar events happened every midnight thereafter. No significant change was found on bedside electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded immediately after the pain attacks. The patient was suspected to have unstable angina and underwent Holter ECG on day 4 of treatment. Holter ECG revealed ST segment elevations and short-run ventricular tachycardia during a pain attack. S1 chemotherapy was discontinued, and no attack was observed thereafter. Coronary CT angiography showed no significant stenosis of coronary arteries.

Conclusions

Clinicians should be aware of vasospastic angina as a serious AE in the chemotherapy with S1. Holter ECG is useful for the early diagnosis of this rare and clinically important AE.

5-fluorouracil and cardiotoxicity: a review

Fluoropyrimidines such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) form the foundation of a wide variety of chemotherapy regimens. 5-FU is in fact the third most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of solid malignancies across the world. As with all chemotherapy, balancing the potential benefits of therapy against the risks of drug-related toxicity is crucial when clinicians and patients make shared decisions about treatment. 5-FU is the second most common chemotherapeutic drug associated with cardiotoxicity after anthracyclines, which can manifest as chest pain, acute coronary syndrome/myocardial infarction or death. Nevertheless a widespread appreciation of 5-FU-related cardiotoxicity and its implications is lacking amongst clinicians. In this review, we outline the incidence, possible risk factors, and likely pathophysiological mechanisms that may account for 5-FU-related cardiotoxicity and also highlight potential management strategies for this poorly understood clinical entity.

5-Fluorouracil-Induced Severe but Reversible Cardiogenic Shock: A Case Report

5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity is increasingly recognized with variable presentation. We report a patient who developed cardiogenic shock due to high-dose 5-fluorouracil infusion (1,000 mg/m2 every 24 hr for 96 hr). There was no evidence of myocardial necrosis. The patient recovered completely without any residual cardiac dysfunction. The exact cause of 5-fluorouracil toxicity remains to be determined. The case highlights the need for careful monitoring of patients who receive high-dose 5-fluorouracil for the development of cardiotoxicity.

Cardiotoxicity as a Result of 5-Fluorouracil Therapy

We report the case of a patient bearing a sigmoid colon carcinoma, stage IV, who after 11 months of antiblastic therapy, having completed a dose of 81,000 mg of 5-FU and CCNU, suffered a myocardial infarct. We attribute this compication to 5-FU. Due to the fact that the coronary angiogram did not confirm the arteriosclerotic nature of the lesion, we suggest that it could have been caused by an endoarteritis, resulting from an immuno-allergic or toxic cumulative process.

Ischemic Cardiopathy from CIS-Diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP)

The authors report a case of ischemic cardiopathy that occured during therapy with CDDP in a woman with an ovarian cancer which had been extensively pre-treated with adriamycin.

Cardiac Toxicity of 5-Fluorouracil Report of a Case of Spontaneous Angina

We report a case of a patient with colon carcinoma and liver metastasis who presented chest pain after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration. Clinical electrocardiographic evolution was similar to that observed in Prinzmetal's angina, and chest pain promptly resolved with nifedipine. These data suggest that coronary spasm may be the cause of cardiotoxicity due to 5-FU, and that calcium antagonists may probably be used in the prevention or treatment of 5-FU cardiotoxicity.

Cardiac Toxicity of 5-Fluorouracil: A Study on 1083 Patients

The possible onset of cardiotoxic manifestations during chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was evaluaetd in 1083 patients treated with the drug for various kinds of neoplasm. We recognized 17 cases of 5-FU cardiopathy (usually anginous crises but also myocardial infarction). The comprehensive incidence was 1.6 %, with a significantly greater risk (4.5 % vs 1.1 %) for patients with a positive anamnesis of previous cardiopathy. On the contrary, age and combination with other antiblastic drugs had no affect on the appearance of cardiopathy. We conclude that 5-FU cardiopathy, although rare, has to be taken into account in oncologic practice, chiefly in those patients already affected with cardiac diseases.

5-Fuorouracil Cardiotoxicity

Two cases of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity, resulting in one patient in myocardial infarction, are described. A review of the literature confirms that cardiotoxicity is a rare but genuine complication of 5-fluorouracil treatment; the cardiotoxic effect seems to range from mild angina without persistent electrocardiographic changes to severe myocardial infarction. No factors predictive of this complication were identified. The authors therefore feel it is advisable to stop 5-fluorouracil treatment when precordial pain occurs, even if the ECG (after angina) is normal, since angina can in some cases result in myocardial infarction.

Cardiotoxicity of 5-Fluorouracil

A case is reported of cardiotoxicity during a multiple drug treatment with fluorouracil, vincristine and CCNU in a patient with a large bowel cancer without any precedent history of heart disease. The patient had chest pain, with an altered ECG and increased serum levels of αHBDH.

Cardiotoxicity Induced by 5-Fluorouracil. A Case Report

A case of ischemic cardiopathy which was observed after 5-fluorouracil administration for a carcinoma of the small intestine is described.

Cardiotoxicity in cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: a systematic review of incidence, manifestations and predisposing factors

PURPOSE

To systematically review the incidence, manifestations and predisposing factors for cardiovascular toxicity in cancer patients treated with systemic 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine.

DESIGN

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of science for studies with ≥ 20 cancer patients evaluating cardiovascular toxicity of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine. We hand searched the reference lists of all included studies. Study selection and assessment of risk of bias were performed by two authors independently.

RESULTS

We identified 30 eligible studies (1 meta-analyses of 4 RCTs, 18 prospective and 11 retrospective). Symptomatic cardiotoxicity occurred in 0-20% of the patients treated with 5-fluorouracil and in 3-35% with capecitabine. The most common symptom was chest pain (0-18.6%) followed by palpitations (0-23.1%), dyspnoea (0-7.6%) and hypotension (0-6%). Severe clinical events such as myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest occurred in 0-2%. Mortality rates ranged from 0 to 8%. Asymptomatic cardiac influence was demonstrated on ECG, in NT-proBNP measurements and with ultrasonic cyclic variation of integrated backscatter. Predisposing factors were mostly tested in univariate analyses. Preexisting cardiac disease was a risk factor in some studies, but there were divergent results. There was some evidence for increased cardiotoxicity during continuous infusion schedules and with concomitant cisplatin treatment. The effects of previous or current chest-radiotherapy were ambiguous.

CONCLUSION

Larger studies suggest an incidence of symptomatic cardiotoxicity of 1.2-4.3% during fluorouracil treatment, however subclinical cardiac influence are common. Possible risk factors are cardiac co-morbidity, continuous infusion schedules and concomitant cisplatin treatment, but existing evidence are of insufficient quality.

Symptomatic 5-fluorouracil-induced sinus bradycardia

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used anti-neoplastic agent. 5-FU has been not uncommonly associated with cardiotoxicity, although the many potentially causative mechanisms are yet to be established. Here, we present the case of a 61-year-old gemstone miner who developed symptomatic sinus bradycardia while receiving a continuous 5-FU infusion combined with radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. This dysrhythmia is an unusual type of 5-FU toxicity, our case being the second described. We review the actions of 5-FU and the various proposed mechanisms of its cardiotoxic effects.

Fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity: revisited

BACKGROUND

The syndrome of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-associated cardiotoxicity remains poorly defined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a literature review (1969 - 2007) and compiled data derived from 377 evaluable cases out of 448 reported cases.

RESULTS

Patient age ranged from 14 to 86 years. Of the patients 65% were 55 years old and the male:female ratio was 1.5:1. The most commonly treated tumors were gastrointestinal (60%), head and neck (22%) and breast (4%). Of the patients 14% had a history of heart disease whereas cardiac risk factors were found in 37%. Mode of administration included: continuous infusion (72%); bolus (22.5%); intermediate infusion (3%); oral (2%); and intraperitoneal (1 patient). The dosages of 5-FU used were < 750 mg/m(2)/day (36%), 751 - 999 (16%), 1,000 (26%), 1,001 - 1,499 (4%) and 1,500 (16%). Of the patients 54% received 5-FU in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin 44%) whereas 51% received 5-FU alone or with leucovorin. Only 4% patients had undergone previous or concomitant radiation therapy to the mediastinum. Of cardiac incidents that happened 69% were seen during or within 72 h of the first cycle of 5-FU. Angina occurred in 45% of patients whereas myocardial infarction was seen in 22%, arrhythmias in 23, acute pulmonary edema in 5, cardiac arrest and pericarditis in 1.4 and heart failure in 2. Electro-cardiographic evidence of ischemia or ST-T changes were recorded in 69% of patients, but abnormal cardiac enzymes were found in only 12%. The cardiac symptoms were reproducible in 47%, including in one patient subsequently treated with 5-FU p.o. Symptoms were also elicited when the same patients were treated with lower doses or different schedules. Of the patients 68% responded to conservative anti-anginal therapy, although prophylactic coronary vasodilators had limited efficacy. Overall, 8% of patients showing cardiotoxicity on 5-FU administration died. Furthermore, 13% reexposed to 5-FU died.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that 5-FU cardiotoxicity is an infrequent but real phenomenon that is independent of dose and may be related to a continuous infusion schedule. The presence of cardiac risk factors is not predictive. Patients should be observed closely and 5-FU administration discontinued if cardiac symptoms develop. A rechallenge with 5-FU should be reserved only for those patients in whom there is no reasonable alternative therapy and should be performed in the setting of aggressive prophylaxis and close monitoring.

Cardiotoxicity of fluoropyrimidines in different schedules of administration: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Cardiotoxicity associated with 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) administration has been infrequently reported in literature, albeit various series of acute coronary syndromes have recorded a low but definite incidence of the above toxicity. In the present study, patients undergoing 5FU-based and oral capecitabine (Xeloda-based chemotherapy were tested for the potential development of cardiac-related symptoms during their administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six hundred and forty-four patients entered the study. Those experiencing any cardiac-related symptoms during 5FU infusion or oral capecitabine were subjected to ECG and serum cardiac enzymes determination. If cardiotoxicity was confirmed, 5FU infusion or oral capecitabine were interrupted, sublingual nitrates administered and cardiac monitoring initiated, while patients with >two-fold enzyme elevation were followed in a coronary care unit for at least 72 h. Cases with acute myocardial infarction were excluded from further 5FU or oral capecitabine treatment.

RESULTS

Overall 26 patients (4.03%) developed symptoms and/or ECG abnormalities due to 5FU and capecitabine. Patients with continuous 5FU infusion presented a higher incidence of cardiotoxicity [14/209; 6.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.3-10.1%] than the remaining (7/317; 2.3%, 95% CI = 0.8-3.3%) (P < 0.012). Specifically, an increased incidence of cardiac-related events was encountered in patients with continuous 24-h 5FU + LV infusion for 5 days (12.5%, 95% CI = 2.3-22.7%) rather than in patients with the same schedule without LV (5.3%, 95% CI = 1.95-8.67%) (P < 0.027), as well as in patients with short 5FU + LV administration (2.4%, 95% CI = 0.9-3.9%) (P < 0.019). Overall, 3/54 patients (5.5%, 95% CI = -0.6-11.1%) on oral capecitabine developed cardiac-related events. Seven out of the 20 patients suffered an acute myocardial infarction, 6 developed ischemia only, while 4 more patients had ECG consistent with coronary vasospasm and 3 with conduction disturbances, of which one subsequently died. Patients administered oral capecitabine had a similar incidence of cardiac-related events; 1/22 (4.5%) patients with advanced breast cancer and 2/32 (6.2%) with colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study supports the toxic effect of 5-FU on the myocardium, which is largely schedule-dependent, whereas a low but finite risk of such toxicity has been observed with oral capecitabine. A high level of alertness is required when using fluoropyrimidines (i.v. 5FU or oral capecitabine), while their toxic effect on the coronary endothelium and myocardium merits further investigation.

Vascular Toxicity of Antineoplastic Agents

Among the various deleterious effects of cancer chemotherapy, vascular toxicity is the least well recognized. This lack of recognition may be because the vasculotoxic phenomena are not unique to antineoplastic agents, can occur in patients without exposure to these agents, and the fact cancer itself may produce a hypercoagulable state. As a result, many vascular events either go unnoticed, are ignored, and/or are attributed to the underlying malignancy. Many antineoplastic therapies are associated with various vascular phenomena that range from simple phelibitis to lethal microangiopathy. Recognition of these events is important to minimize the morbidity and even prevent unnecessary deaths. Herein we review the vascular syndromes that have been reported in association with antineoplastic agents.

Cardiotoxicity of cancer chemotherapy: implications for children

Many children and adolescents with cancer receive chemotherapeutic agents that are cardiotoxic. Thus, while survival rates in this population have improved for some cancers, many survivors may experience acute or chronic cardiovascular complications that can impair their quality of life years after treatment. In addition, cardiac complications of treatment lead to reductions in dose and duration of chemotherapy regimens, potentially compromising clinical efficacy. Anthracyclines are well known for their cardiotoxicity, and alkylating agents, such as cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, busulfan, and mitomycin, have also been associated with cardiotoxicity. Other agents with cardiac effects include vinca alkaloids, fluorouracil, cytarabine, amsacrine, and asparaginase and the newer agents, paclitaxel, trastuzumab, etoposide, and teniposide. The heart is relatively vulnerable to oxidative injuries from oxygen radicals generated by chemotherapy. The cardiac effects of these drugs include asymptomatic electrocardiographic abnormalities, blood pressure changes, arrhythmias, myocarditis, pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, acute myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, shock, and long-term cardiomyopathy. These effects may occur during or immediately after treatment or may not be apparent until months or years after treatment. Mild myocardiocyte injury from chemotherapy may be of more concern in children than in adults because of the need for subsequent cardiac growth to match somatic growth and because survival is longer in children. Primary prevention is therefore important. Patients should be educated about the cardiotoxic risks of treatment and the need for long-term cardiac monitoring before chemotherapy is begun. Cardiotoxicity may be prevented by screening for risk factors, monitoring for signs and symptoms during chemotherapy, and continuing follow-up that may include electrocardiographic and echocardiographic studies, angiography, and measurements of biochemical markers of myocardial injury. Secondary prevention should aim to minimize progression of left ventricular dysfunction to overt heart failure. Approaches include altering the dose, schedule, or approach to drug delivery; using analogs or new formulations with fewer or milder cardiotoxic effects; using cardioprotectants and agents that reduce oxidative stress during chemotherapy; correcting for metabolic derangements caused by chemotherapy that can potentiate the cardiotoxic effects of the drug; and cardiac monitoring during and after cancer therapy. Avoiding additional cardiotoxic regimens is also important in managing these patients. Treating the adverse cardiac effects of chemotherapy will usually be dependent on symptoms or will depend on the anticipated cardiovascular effects of each regimen. Treatments include diuresis, afterload reduction, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, and improving myocardial contractility.

Insuffisances cardiaques d’origine médicamenteuse (en dehors des anthracyclines)

The principal drugs implicated in or disclosing cardiac insufficiency are drawn from a review of the literature and observations by the French national pharmacovigilance database, from 1984 to April 2003. Several pharmacological classes are identified: in addition to antimitotic drugs, such as anthracyclines, many drugs are implicated in cardiac insufficiency, e.g. immunomodulators, anti-inflammatory drugs (including coxibs), antiarrhythmic drugs, anaesthetic drugs, antipsychotic drugs, and antidiabetic drugs (including glitazones). It is usual to classify these drugs according to three categories: (i) drugs likely to cause cardiac insufficiency de novo (such as cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, mitoxantrone, interferons, interleukin-2 etc.); (ii) drugs likely to worsen preexisting cardiac insufficiency (such as antiarrhythmics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, nonsteroidal and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sympathomimetic drugs etc.); and (iii) drugs only occasionally causing cardiac insufficiency. This review shows that this classification is, in fact, artificial. If cardiac toxicity is a constant concern when using antimitotic drugs or some immunomodulator drugs, it is advisable to exercise caution in the use of many other drugs when treating patients with cardiac insufficiency, even if the clinical situation is well controlled. In particular, drug-drug interactions and patient medical history must be taken into account.

Cardiotoxicity and capecitabine: a case report

Oral fluoropyrimidines increasingly are being developed and studied as a novel treatment for breast, colorectal, and other cancers. Fluoropyrimidines are designed to generate 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) preferentially within tumors. Cardiotoxicity is a rare complication associated with 5-FU and oral fluoropyrimidine treatments. Chest pain is the most common presenting symptom, and, in many cases, the cardiotoxicity is partly or completely reversible. This article reviews fluoropyrimidine-induced cardiotoxicity and presents a case report of a woman who experienced this complication during capecitabine treatment.

5-fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity mimicking myocardial infarction: a case report

BACKGROUND

Severe cardiotoxicity is a documented, but very unusual side-effect of intravenous 5-fluorouracil therapy. The mechanism producing cardiotoxicity is poorly understood.

CASE PRESENTATION

A case of 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity, possibly due to coronary artery spasm, and mimicking acute anterolateral myocardial infarction is presented and discussed. Electrocardiographs highlighting the severity of the presentation are included in the report along with coronary angiograms demonstrating the absence of significant coronary atherosclerosis.

CONCLUSION

Severe 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity is rare, but can be severe and may mimic acute myocardial infarction, leading to diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Readministration of 5-fluorouracil is not advised following an episode of cardiotoxicity.

Acute reversible cardiomyopathy and thromboembolism after cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy--a case report

Acute development of cardiomyopathy and occlusive thromboembolic events following cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is rare but frequently lethal. The authors report the successful management of such an event in a 52-year-old man with squamous cell carcinoma of the soft palate. The possible pathophysiological mechanisms are discussed.

Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents: incidence, treatment and prevention

Cytostatic antibiotics of the anthracycline class are the best known of the chemotherapeutic agents that cause cardiotoxicity. Alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, carmustine, busulfan, chlormethine and mitomycin have also been associated with cardiotoxicity. Other agents that may induce a cardiac event include paclitaxel, etoposide, teniposide, the vinca alkaloids, fluorouracil, cytarabine, amsacrine, cladribine, asparaginase, tretinoin and pentostatin. Cardiotoxicity is rare with some agents, but may occur in >20% of patients treated with doxorubicin, daunorubicin or fluorouracil. Cardiac events may include mild blood pressure changes, thrombosis, electrocardiographic changes, arrhythmias, myocarditis, pericarditis, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, cardiac failure (left ventricular failure) and congestive heart failure. These may occur during or shortly after treatment, within days or weeks after treatment, or may not be apparent until months, and sometimes years, after completion of chemotherapy. A number of risk factors may predispose a patient to cardiotoxicity. These are: cumulative dose (anthracyclines, mitomycin); total dose administered during a day or a course (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, carmustine, fluorouracil, cytarabine); rate of administration (anthracyclines, fluorouracil); schedule of administration (anthracyclines); mediastinal radiation; age; female gender; concurrent administration of cardiotoxic agents; prior anthracycline chemotherapy; history of or pre-existing cardiovascular disorders; and electrolyte imbalances such as hypokalaemia and hypomagnesaemia. The potential for cardiotoxicity should be recognised before therapy is initiated. Patients should be screened for risk factors, and an attempt to modify them should be made. Monitoring for cardiac events and their treatment will usually depend on the signs and symptoms anticipated and exhibited. Patients may be asymptomatic, with the only manifestation being electrocardiographic changes. Continuous cardiac monitoring, baseline and regular electrocardiographic and echocardiographic studies, radionuclide angiography and measurement of serum electrolytes and cardiac enzymes may be considered in patients with risk factors or those with a history of cardiotoxicity. Treatment of most cardiac events induced by chemotherapy is symptomatic. Agents that can be used prophylactically are few, although dexrazoxane, a cardioprotective agent specific for anthracycline chemotherapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Cardiotoxicity can be prevented by screening and modifying risk factors, aggressively monitoring for signs and symptoms as chemotherapy is administered, and continuing follow-up after completion of a course or the entire treatment. Prompt measures such as discontinuation or modification of chemotherapy or use of appropriate drug therapy should be initiated on the basis of changes in monitoring parameters before the patient exhibits signs and symptoms of cardiotoxicity.

Cardiotoxicity of the antiproliferative compound fluorouracil

The antimetabolite fluorouracil (5-FU) is frequently administered for chemotherapy of various malignant neoplasms. The drug is well known for its adverse effects involving bone marrow, skin, mucous membranes, intestinal tract and central nervous system, whereas its cardiotoxicity is less familiar to clinicians. The pathophysiology of fluorouracil-associated cardiac adverse events is controversial and conclusions are based on clinical studies and case reports more than on solid experimental evidence. While clinical and electrocardiographic features suggest myocardial ischaemia as a main aetiological factor, possibly induced by coronary vasospasm, histomorphological and biochemical studies indicate a more direct drug-mediated cytotoxic action. Estimates of the overall incidence of fluorouracil cardiotoxicity have varied widely from 1.2 to 18% of patients. Patients may present with angina-like chest pain, cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial infarction. There is no unequivocally effective prophylaxis or treatment in this syndrome. Once fluorouracil administration is discontinued symptoms are usually reversible, although fatal events have been described. The overall mortality rate has been estimated to be between 2.2 and 13.3%. There is a high risk of relapse when patients are re-exposed to this drug following previous cardiac incidents. From the present data it is concluded that cardiotoxicity is a relevant but underestimated problem in fluorouracil treatment. Since the mechanisms of fluorouracil-associated cardiotoxicity are not yet fully understood, all patients undergoing this chemotherapy have to be carefully evaluated and monitored for cardiac risk factors and complaints. After cardiotoxic events, fluorouracil should definitely be withdrawn and replaced by an alternative antiproliferative regimen.

Creatine kinase elevation associated with 5-fluorouracil and levamisole therapy for carcinoma of the colon. A case report

BACKGROUND

There have been no reports of creatine phosphokinase (CK) elevation during levamisole administration. There is only one prior report of CK elevation of noncardiac origin associated with 5-fluorouracil.

METHODS

A 41-year-old man was diagnosed with Stage B2 colon carcinoma and underwent extensive surgical resection. Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil and levamisole was initiated after surgery. A complete hematologic and chemistry profile was obtained during weekly clinic visits.

RESULTS

The patient's serum CK levels were normal prior to the initiation of chemotherapy but began to rise after 4 weeks of therapy, Isoenzyme analysis revealed that the CK was 100% from skeletal muscle. When the CK level surpassed 1,000 U/L, chemotherapy was discontinued. The CK levels began to decline immediately, falling to normal within 2 months. All attempts to identify a known cause of the enzyme elevation were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal relationship between chemotherapy administration, enzyme elevation, and the rapid fall in enzyme levels upon discontinuation of treatment argue strongly in favor of chemotherapy as the etiology of CK elevation in the patient.

Chemoradiation in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Resectability, local control, and survival were evaluated in advanced stage nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with simultaneous chemoradiation therapy delivered in an accelerated, interrupted twice-a-day schedule.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-seven consecutive patients with Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer, consenting to participation in the study, received cisplatin, 30 mg/m2 for 3 days, etoposid, 80 mg/m2 for 3 days, and 5-fluorouracil, 900 mg/m2 for 4 days. Radiation therapy consisted of 2 Gy given twice a day for 5 days. Two weeks rest was planned between cycles. Patients were evaluated for resectability after the second cycle. Any patient with unresectable tumor received a third cycle of treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were evaluable for acute toxicity: eighteen (38%) required an extended rest period for esophagitis or low blood count; 3 (6%) had sepsis, of whom 1 (2%) expired. Three patients (6%) had multiple blood transfusions for low hemoglobin. Median follow-up is 23.6 months, with a range of 10-49 months. Nine patients (19%) failed locally; 15 (32%) had local and distant failure; 7 (15%) failed only at distant sites. Twelve patients (25.5%) are alive with no evidence of disease; 4 patients were lost to follow-up with disease. The 2-year actuarial survival is 49%, and the 4-year is 28.2%.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous chemoradiation is well tolerated with acceptable toxicity. The overall 2- and 4-year actuarial survival is somewhat better than that reported in the literature. Resectability in Stage IIIB patients was not increased with this regimen nor was any surgical specimen free of cancer. The 47% distant failure rate is not different from those reported by others.

Adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil for breast cancer of likely poor prognosis: 15-year results of a randomized trial

In a trial conducted in southeast Scotland between April 1974 and December 1979, 332 women with invasive breast cancer of Stage I and II with histological evidence of node involvement, or who had operable or inoperable Stage III disease, were randomized, after primary local therapy (mastectomy, node biopsy and radiotherapy for all except the inoperable disease patients who underwent radiotherapy alone) to receive 12 4-weekly intravenous injections of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 700 mg/m2 or no systemic therapy. After a median follow-up of 15 years from randomization, no difference is shown between the two groups in terms of distant relapse (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02; 95% CI 0.78-1.32), event free survival (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.97-1.56), or total survival (HR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.93-1.52). Locoregional relapse is significantly reduced by 5-FU administration (HR = 1.88; 95% CI 1.20-2.96). The results are similar for the trial as a whole or when mastectomy patients are considered alone. Toxicity was minimal with marrow suppression in only 19 of 147 patients receiving more than one injection; only five patients discontinued therapy due to nausea and vomiting. However, retrosternal pain occurred in 16 patients, nine of whom had their treatment curtailed as a result. Seventy-seven per cent of patients have died, the majority from breast cancer. Only 1.2% of deaths are considered attributable to cardiac causes of 5-FU is not associated with excess cardiac deaths in these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The spectrum of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

To report three cases of cardiotoxicity related to the administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with cancer.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Three patients with gastrointestinal malignancies were being treated with combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens. Two patients developed myocardial ischaemia and the other a ventricular arrhythmia in association with 5-FU administration.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

All patients survived the cardiac event. No patient was rechallenged with 5-FU. Radiotherapy was continued, achieving a good tumour response.

CONCLUSION

Cardiotoxicity is rarely reported with 5-FU. The cardiac events can be life threatening. It is difficult to predict which patients will be affected. Clinicians need to be aware of this potential toxicity and monitor patients appropriately.

Combined modality treatment using BID radiation for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

From February 1988 to August 1991, 82 patients were treated on Phase II trial of split-course multimodality treatment for locally advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Treatment consisted of twice-daily radiation (150 cGy/fraction) delivered with concomitant infusional cisplatin, etoposide, and fluorouracil for 1 week every third week. Patients were classified before initial treatment as either potentially resectable (eligible for surgery [ES]) or ineligible for surgery (IES). The ES group consisted of 38 Stage IIIA and 7 Stage IIIB patients. The IES group had 5 patients staged as IIIA and 32 staged as IIIB. Most patients were staged clinically. ES patients received three cycles of treatment (39 Gy) before resection. IES patients received four cycles (60 Gy) delivered with curative intent.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of 45 ES patients underwent resection. The pathologic response rate was 27%. Three-year actuarial local control was 86% for 41 evaluable ES patients. Three-year actuarial survival for the whole ES group was 39%, with a median follow-up for living patients of 32 months. The IES group faired less well, with an 18% 3-year actuarial survival. Treatment was well tolerated with a median weight loss of one-half pound, mild or moderate pneumonitis in 5%, mild esophagitis in 15%, and severe nausea and/or vomiting in 10% of patients. Treatment-related mortality was 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with conventional radiation alone for Stage III NSCLC are rarely cured. This well tolerated Phase II study demonstrated encouraging results for such patients. Both local control and survival appeared promising, especially in patients rendered resectable after combined-modality treatment.

Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

To review the clinical manifestations, postulated mechanisms, and therapeutic implications of fluorouracil-induced cardiac toxicity.

DATA SOURCE

A MEDLINE search was used to identify pertinent literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies and case reports on fluorouracil cardiotoxicity were identified through a MEDLINE search. A manual review of bibliographies of identified articles was performed to ensure that all pertinent articles were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data pertaining to all aspects of fluorouracil cardiac toxicity, including pathogenesis, predisposing factors, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic implications, were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Estimates from large series suggest a 1.6-2.3 percent incidence of clinically demonstrated cardiotoxicity. Predisposing factors include the presence of coronary artery disease and concurrent radiotherapy. Postulated mechanisms include direct myocardial ischemia, coronary spasm, or cardiotoxic impurities in fluorouracil formulation. Clinical manifestations include chest pain, nausea, diaphoresis with typical ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, relieved to normal after stopping the drug therapy. Nitrates and calcium-channel blockers do not protect against cardiotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity may be much more common and clinically significant than previously thought. A high index of suspicion for cardiotoxicity must be maintained when the drug is administered, especially in the presence of heart disease and concomitant radiation therapy. In the presence of chest pain, it is mandatory to stop the infusion and, if possible, to replace fluorouracil with another chemotherapeutic agent.

Clinical cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil

5-Fluorouracil is widely known to be toxic to the hematopoietic and gastrointestinal systems. It also has cardiac toxicity, but this is perceived to be rare. During a 16-month period from January 1990 through April 1991, approximately 910 patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil. Five of these developed life-threatening toxicity consistent with coronary artery spasm for an incidence of .55%. The acute events occurred on the third or fourth day of the 5-day infusion and after the fourth intravenous bolus in the patient on bolus therapy. Each of the patients had ST elevation and ventricular arrhythmias, four had acute myocardial infarction, and two had cardiac arrests. In these cases and those previously reported, cardiac toxicity is consistent with drug- or metabolite-mediated increases in coronary vasomotor tone and spasm, leading to the full spectrum of signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia in susceptible individuals.

Simultaneous chemoradiation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We designed our study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of simultaneous chemoradiation therapy in an accelerated, twice-a-day schedule to improve local control and survival in advanced lung cancer patients. Forty-one patients were entered into the study. Twenty-three had stage IIIB and 18 had stage IIIA disease. They received cisplatin 30 mg/m2, VP-16 80 mg/m2, and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 900 mg/m2 in iv infusion. Radiation therapy consisted of 2G twice a day for 5 days, followed by a 2-week rest. This cycle was repeated 3 times. Patients were evaluated for surgical resection after the second cycle. Acute toxicity was acceptable: 3 patients expired (1 congestive heart failure, 1 sepsis, 1 pulmonary embolism). The 1-year actuarial survival was 60.3%; the 2-year actuarial survival was 55.3%. Our results show that this regimen is well tolerated and that the 2-year actuarial survival appears to be comparable to that reported in the literature.

The syndrome of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity. An elusive cardiopathy

BACKGROUND

A case of reversible cardiogenic shock linked to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was observed. Recognizing the increasing use of 5-FU, the authors tried to map this syndrome.

METHODS

They reviewed 134 additional case reports, retrieved information from literature searches, focused on clinical features, and discussed possible pathophysiologic findings and prevention of this syndrome.

RESULTS

Although angina and electrocardiographic changes were common and reproducible (approximately 90% each), coronary artery disease was found in a few patients. A total of 33 patients had severe left ventricular dysfunction, 28 without evidence of myocardial infarction. The symptoms were responsive to conservative management (90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac toxicity is a little known complication of 5-FU therapy, with an unknown but significant incidence. It is highly treatable.

Combined modality therapy for stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma: results of treatment and patterns of failure

Patients with Stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma continue to pose a therapeutic problem with dismal cure rates. In an effort to improve on these results, 129 patients with biopsy-proven clinical Stage III non-small cell lung carcinoma from November 1982 through November 1987, were entered into two consecutive Phase II studies at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center. Treatment in the first study consisted of Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil infusion with concomitant split course radiation; in the second Etoposide was added. Radiation and chemotherapy were given simultaneously on days one through five of each cycle in a preoperative fashion for four cycles in patients considered eligible for surgery and in a definitive fashion for six cycles in patients considered ineligible for surgery. Radiation was given in 2 Gy fractions for a planned preoperative dose of 40 Gy and a definitive dose of 60 Gy. Surgical resection was attempted four to five weeks later in patients treated preoperatively. Thus, 83 patients were treated preoperatively and 46 definitively. Eighty-three patients (64%) had IIIA disease and IIIB disease was found in the remainder of the patients. Sixty-two patients (75%) in the eligible for surgery group had a thoracotomy after the combined treatment with a resectability rate of 97% and an operative mortality rate of 5%. There were 17 patients (27%) with no evidence of residual cancer in the resected specimen. Three-year survival for the eligible for surgery group at 40% was significantly better than 19% observed in the ineligible for surgery group (p = 0.003). Seventy-six percent of the patients with no residual cancer in the resected specimen are recurrence-free at three years compared to 34% of the patients with gross residual. A total of 81 patients have failed after their treatment; 49 (59%) in the eligible for surgery group and 32 (70%) in the ineligible for surgery group. Of all the patients who failed, local failure alone and as a component occurred in 21 (26%) and 36 (44%) patients, respectively. Failure in distant sites alone was noted in 56% of the overall failures. Severe toxicity was unusual. There were three treatment related deaths (2%). Radiation esophagitis and pneumonitis were only mild to moderate seen in less than 10% of the patients. Survival rates and patterns of failure according to the stage of the disease, histology, treatment group and pathologic response will be presented in detail.

Vascular events in patients receiving high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: the University of Chicago experience

In a retrospective review, 22 of a total of 244 patients (9%) patients with head and neck or gastrointestinal cancer who were treated with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimens experienced thrombotic vascular events. These events occurred concurrently with treatment or several months following the completion of therapy and consisted mainly of cardiac arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, sudden death, and thromboembolism. The temporal relationship of these vascular events to the time of treatment suggests that infusional 5-FU may have been the underlying cause.

5-Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity: a critical review

5-Fluorouracil is a commonly administered chemotherapy agent that has infrequently been associated with cardiotoxicity. This review highlights the clinical features of this syndrome as described in reports from the medical literature. Clinical and laboratory evidence supporting proposed underlying mechanisms are reviewed.

Cardiotoxicity during chemotherapy treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin

Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin chemotherapy for esophageal, head and neck and gastric carcinoma was studied. Before treatment all patients had a cardiac evaluation and during treatment serial electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings were performed. In the pre-treatment evaluation signs of cardiovascular disease were found in 31(38.75%) patients. During treatment cardiotoxicity was observed in 12(15%) patients. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was not higher in patients with signs of cardiovascular disease than in those without in the pre-treatment evaluation. The most common signs of cardiotoxicity were chest pain, ST-T wave changes and arrhythmia. This study suggests that patients on 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin treatment should be under close supervision and that the treatment should be discontinued if chest pain and/or arrhythmias are observed.

Electrocardiographic changes simulating acute myocardial infarction or ischemia associated with combination chemotherapy with etoposide, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil

Three cases of cardiotoxicity manifested by chest pain, tachycardia, respiratory distress, and electrocardiographic changes simulating acute myocardial infarction or ischemia were observed during the course of combination chemotherapy with etoposide, cisplatin, and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. There was no cardiac enzyme elevation. A similar but rare clinical syndrome has been described in association with 5-fluorouracil infusion as a single agent or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. We describe the cases and review their possible pathogeneses and clinical implications.

Preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Surgical therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not resulted in substantial long-term survival. Neoadjuvant treatment programs that could down-stage the tumor and achieve increased long-term survival would be of obvious benefit. We have used preoperative simultaneous chemotherapy and irradiation in 85 patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer considered candidates for surgical resection. One group of 56 patients was treated with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and simultaneous irradiation for five days every other week for a total of four cycles. After treatment, 39 patients underwent resection, and the operative mortality was 2 (5%) of 39. A second trial was undertaken in which etoposide (VP-16) was added because of its synergism with cisplatin. In this group, 29 patients were considered to have potentially resectable disease, and 23 underwent thoracotomy with 1 operative death (4%). Of the total of 62 patients having thoracotomy, 60 underwent resection (97%). Complications were major, and there were four bronchopleural fistulas. For the 85 patients eligible for surgical intervention in these two groups of patients, the Kaplan-Meier median survival estimate is 40% at 3 years. The median survival of the 62 patients having thoracotomy is 36.6 months. Combination preoperative chemotherapy and irradiation is feasible with acceptable toxicity and operative mortality in patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Prospective randomized studies are suggested for further evaluation of this treatment program.