Results of pulmonary valvotomy and infundibular resection in 100 cases of Fallot's tetralogy

Efficacy in asthma of once-daily treatment with fluticasone furoate: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Background

Fluticasone furoate (FF) is a novel long-acting inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study evaluated the efficacy and safety of FF 200 mcg or 400 mcg once daily, either in the morning or in the evening, and FF 200 mcg twice daily (morning and evening), for 8 weeks in patients with persistent asthma.

Methods

Asthma patients maintained on ICS for ≥ 3 months with baseline morning forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) 50-80% of predicted normal value and FEV₁ reversibility of ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 ml were eligible. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline FEV₁ at week 8 in pre-dose (morning or evening [depending on regimen], pre-rescue bronchodilator) FEV₁.

Results

A total of 545 patients received one of five FF treatment groups and 101 patients received placebo (intent-to-treat population). Each of the five FF treatment groups produced a statistically significant improvement in pre-dose FEV₁ compared with placebo (p < 0.05). FF 400 mcg once daily in the evening and FF 200 mcg twice daily produced similar placebo-adjusted improvements in evening pre-dose FEV₁ at week 8 (240 ml vs. 235 ml). FF 400 mcg once daily in the morning, although effective, resulted in a smaller improvement in morning pre-dose FEV₁ than FF 200 mcg twice daily at week 8 (315 ml vs. 202 ml). The incidence of oral candidiasis was low (0-4%) and UC excretion was comparable with placebo for all FF groups.

Conclusions

FF at total daily doses of 200 mcg or 400 mcg was significantly more effective than placebo. FF 400 mcg once daily in the evening had similar efficacy to FF 200 mcg twice daily and all FF regimens had a safety tolerability profile generally similar to placebo. This indicates that inhaled FF is an effective and well tolerated once-daily treatment for mild-to-moderate asthma.

Trial registration

NCT00398645

Evidence of the in vivo esterification of budesonide in human airways

AIMS

Budesonide, unlike fluticasone propionate, undergoes fatty acid esterification in the lungs, and there is a need to characterize fully the distribution and fate of the two drugs after inhalation in humans.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized study was performed in adults undergoing whole lung or lobar resection resulting from lung cancer. Patients were given single 1000-mug doses of both budesonide and fluticasone propionate via dry powder inhalers before surgery. Tissue samples from peripheral and central lung, an ex vivo bronchial brush sample and intercostal muscle, together with plasma samples, were taken during surgery and analysed by liquid chromatography plus tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Lung tissue samples were obtained from 22 patients at surgery, 1-43 h after drug dosing. Budesonide was detectable from earliest sampling in central and peripheral lung tissue up to 10 h (in six of 22 samples), fluticasone propionate up to 22 h after inhalation (in 16 of 22 samples), and budesonide oleate up to 43 h after inhalation (in 21 of 22 samples). Budesonide, but not fluticasone propionate, was detected in intercostal muscle for up to 10 h after inhalation. Bronchial brush samples showed the presence of fluticasone propionate for up to 18 h, suggesting the presence of undissolved drug powder particles in the airway lumen.

CONCLUSION

Sustained retention of esterified budesonide in the lungs supports the prolonged duration of action of budesonide and suitability for once-daily administration.

Once-daily inhaled budesonide for the treatment of asthma: clinical evidence and pharmacokinetic explanation

BACKGROUND

Budesonide, a widely used inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with a favorable therapeutic ratio, is available via a dry powder inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) and as a suspension for nebulization (Pulmicort Respules).

METHODS

MEDLINE and an AstraZeneca database were searched to identify relevant controlled clinical trials published between 1986 and 2002 using the key words budesonide OR inhaled corticosteroid, AND once daily.

RESULTS

Thirty-four controlled clinical studies involving once-daily administration of budesonide to asthmatic patients were identified. Excluding long-term studies, this review presents data from 23 controlled studies for 4466 adults or adolescents and 1532 children with asthma and demonstrates efficacy of budesonide in both corticosteroid-naïve patients and patients previously treated with ICS. Once-daily administration of budesonide achieves clinical efficacy comparable with that of twice-daily regimens in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and is equally effective when given in the morning or evening. Once-daily administration simplifies treatment regimens and may improve patient compliance. The tolerability profiles of budesonide once-daily via Turbuhaler or as budesonide inhalation suspension are good and comparable with those for twice-daily dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily budesonide is effective and well tolerated as initial treatment for adults and children with mild asthma and as maintenance therapy in patients with more severe asthma once asthma control has been achieved.

The role of intracellular esterification in budesonide once-daily dosing and airway selectivity

BACKGROUND

Since their introduction in the 1970s, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) have been used to control airway inflammation associated with asthma. Budesonide is one of the ICSs recommended as first-line therapy for mild to moderate persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This article describes the esterification of budesonide and how it results in prolonged, location-specific retention of drug in the airways, allowing once-daily dosing.

RESULTS

Studies conducted over the past decade have shown that budesonide forms reversible fatty acid esters within the cells of airway tissue, resulting in the formation of an intracellular depot pool of inactive drug. As the intracellular concentration of free budesonide decreases, these budesonide esters are hydrolyzed back to their active state. This process increases budesonide's retention in the airways, prolongs its duration of action, and lowers the risk of systemic effects.

CONCLUSIONS

By extending budesonide's local anti-inflammatory effect and increasing its airway selectivity, the esterification process appears to contribute to the drug's efficacy, particularly during once-daily administration. Reducing the number of required daily inhalations may increase patient compliance with asthma therapy, although this remains to be evaluated.

Preclinical properties of budesonide: translation to the clinical setting

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) nearly 30 years ago, the management of asthma has been transformed. It is now understood that asthma is primarily a disease of chronic inflammation, even in its milder forms, and that to delay treatment may lead to deterioration in lung function. International treatment guidelines for asthma recommend early intervention with a potent ICS, with the greatest benefit observed when treatment is started within 2 years of the onset of symptoms. Each of the currently available ICSs has distinct physical and pharmacokinetic properties and is delivered via different devices.

OBJECTIVE

This article brings together the findings and concepts presented in this supplement. It provides an overview of budesonide's predicted clinical efficacy and tolerability in patients with asthma based on its physical properties and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide's physical properties and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles help predict its clinical efficacy and tolerability when used as early intervention in asthma. Study results indicate that lung deposition of budesonide is increased by delivery via dry-powder inhaler, enhancing the drug's efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed mild persistent asthma. The preclinical, clinical, and safety data support budesonide's predicted performance in the clinical setting.

Therapeutic margin of budesonide in patients with mild to severe asthma

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic margin of a drug is the difference between the optimal effective dose and the dose at which unacceptable adverse effects occur. This margin is particularly important in the case of therapies that are used long term for the control of chronic illnesses, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in the treatment of asthma. Because data from controlled clinical studies indicate that the available ICSs have similar clinical efficacy, the safety profile is central to differentiating between them on the basis of their therapeutic margins. The main safety concern with long-term use and high doses of ICSs is systemic exposure that could result in such unwanted effects as cortisol suppression, a reduction in the final adult height of pediatric patients, and decreased bone mineral density.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews data from clinical trials, including long-term prospective studies, to compare the therapeutic margin of budesonide with those of other second-generation ICSs and to determine whether there are variations in the therapeutic margin with different delivery devices, severities of disease, or patient age.

RESULTS

Based on the tolerability data for budesonide from short-term (6-12 wk) and long-term (1-9 y) studies in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma, the dose-response and dose-tolerability curves for budesonide delivered by dry-powder inhaler can be plotted in parallel. The margin between these curves-the therapeutic margin-is favorable and consistent in pediatric and adult patients and at all degrees of asthma severity. Fewer tolerability data are available for other ICSS.

CONCLUSION

Whereas budesonide has clinical efficacy similar to that of other currently available ICSs, it has a good safety profile-and hence a favorable therapeutic margin-that is supported by long-term clinical data. Budesonides favorable therapeutic margin is probably a result of its pharmacokinetic and physical properties.

Expected characteristics of an ideal, all-purpose inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are well established as the mainstay of asthma therapy. A number of ICSs are now available, each with unique pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles and physical characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the key characteristics of an ideal ICS and uses examples of existing agents to indicate the extent to which therapies reach these goals.

RESULTS

Improved therapeutic efficacy in an ICS may be offset by an increase in systemic effects. The ideal characteristics of an ICS include optimal clinical efficacy and no toxicity in combination with a convenient and easy-to-use inhaler device. To achieve this optimal profile, an ICS should have the following: a high affinity for and potency at the glucocorticoid receptor; prolonged retention in the lung; minimal or no oral bioavailability (ie, high first-pass inactivation); and rapid, complete systemic inactivation. The formulation and type of inhaler device are also important considerations: they should provide deposition in the lung in both large and small airways with no absorption effects outside the lung. ICSs should be evaluated for administration with several different delivery devices to ensure ease of use by patients of all ages with different asthma severities. An ICS that can be administered QD is also likely to improve patient adherence by simplifying the treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

An ideal ICS should have a large therapeutic margin, be used safely and effectively for long periods, be administered QD, be suitable for use in patients of all ages and asthma severities, and offer both control and prevention of asthma symptoms and exacerbations.

Review of the unique properties of budesonide

BACKGROUND

The aim of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy for asthma is to attain high therapeutic activity in the airways while keeping the risk of systemic adverse effects relatively low. However, the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of various ICSs affect this ratio, thereby influencing their ability to fulfill the requirements of an ideal agent.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the physical and pharmacokinetic properties of budesonide, outlining how they, safety data, and use of different inhalation devices enable budesonide to meet many of the clinical requirements of an ideal ICS for the treatment of asthma.

RESULTS

ICS efficacy is influenced by lipophilicity, lung deposition, and retention in airway tissue, whereas the rate of elimination determines systemic activity. Budesonide is retained in the airways to a greater extent than other ICSs because of an esterification process that increases its lipophilicity. The prolonged retention of budesonide in the airways may contribute to its efficacy when administered QD. In addition to a pressurized metered-dose inhaler, budesonide is available as a dry-powder inhaler and in nebulized form, which can be used by asthma patients aged > or =6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

When combined with delivery devices suitable for a spectrum of patient groups, the physical and pharmacokinetic properties of budesonide lend it many of the characteristics of an ideal ICS, including favorable efficacy and tolerability profiles.

Maurice Campbell: first editor of Heart

Maurice Campbell was the first editor of the British Heart Journal, now Heart, and was called the journal's progenitor and formative influence, an untiring editor who virtually produced each issue single handedly. Campbell was also valued for his scholarly opinions, organisational and editorial skills, and for his careful statistical work which was advanced for its time and of great importance in the early understanding and treatment of congenital heart disease and arrhythmias. In addition, his collaboration with Russell Brock was instrumental in developing surgery for rheumatic and congenital heart disease at Guy's Hospital.

Budesonide Turbuhaler delivered once daily improves health-related quality of life and maintains improvements with a stepped-down dose in adults with mild to moderate asthma

BACKGROUND

Budesonide inhalation powder administered via Turbuhaler (budesonide Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE) is proven efficacious and safe in the treatment of mild to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in adults with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel-group study, 309 asthmatic patients between 18 and 70 years of age were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with budesonide 200 or 400 microg or placebo for 6 weeks. Patients initially receiving 400 microg budesonide had their dose reduced to 200 microg (400/200-microg group), and patients receiving 200 microg (200/200-microg group) or placebo continued to receive their assigned doses for a 12-week maintenance phase. HRQL was evaluated using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at randomization, week 6, and week 18.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, patients initially receiving 400 and 200 microg budesonide Turbuhaler demonstrated significantly greater HRQL scores at week 6 (P < or = 0.001 and P < or = 0.010, respectively) that were maintained at week 18 (P < or = 0.001). Clinically important (> or = 0.5 unit) improvement in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire overall at week 18 was demonstrated by 55% and 43% of patients in the 400/200-microg and 200/200-microg budesonide Turbuhaler groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild to moderate asthma, once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler 200 and 400 microg demonstrates statistically significant and clinically important improvements in HRQL that can be maintained with a low dose of 200 microg.

Efficacy of budesonide in inhaled corticosteroid-naive patients and patients with mild persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with mild intermittent or mild persistent asthma represent 70% of asthma sufferers. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the mainstay of treatment for persistent asthma, although many of the early clinical studies of these drugs included only patients with moderate to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the literature on the efficacy of budesonide in the treatment of mild persistent asthma, including newly diagnosed ICS-naive patients.

METHODS

Published data were identified by a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature from 1992 to 2002 using the terms budesonide plus efficacy or safety, both with and without the termsfluticasone or beclomethasone. An AstraZeneca reference database was also used to identify publications from the same period. Controlled, randomized studies that included patients with mild persistent asthma and early-treatment intervention were selected for inclusion.

RESULTS

Inhaled budesonide has been used for almost 20 years in the treatment and control of moderate to severe asthma. Studies involving patients with mild persistent asthma have demonstrated significant improvements in peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates (P < 0.01) and forced expiratory volume in I second (P < 0.016) values for adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients treated with budesonide compared with placebo. Budesonide therapy is effective when given once or twice daily via dry powder inhaler or nebulizer, even at a low starting dose (200 microg/d). No significant adverse events have been reported with budesonide within the dose range used to treat mild persistent asthma (200 to 400 microg/d). Significant improvements in PEF rates (P < 0.01) and significant reductions in the risk of exacerbations and the number of days with poorly controlled asthma have been reported for ICS-naive patients treated with budesonide compared with placebo (both P < 0.001). In the primary care setting, mild persistent asthma may be undertreated. Patients with mild persistent asthma benefit significantly from early treatment with budesonide (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild persistent asthma in adults and children, including many patients whose primary care physicians do not think they require daily ICS treatment.

Once-daily budesonide via Turbuhaler improves symptoms in adults with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of twice-daily budesonide Turbuhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) for the treatment of mild to severe asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide Turbuhaler administered once daily each morning with placebo in inhaled corticosteroid-naive adults with persistent asthma.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 177 adults (aged 18 to 70 years) received placebo or once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler (400 microg) for 12 weeks. Efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and AM/PM peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and nighttime/daytime asthma symptom scores, patient discontinuations, use of breakthrough medication (albuterol), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of FVC (FEF25%-75%), and quality of life assessments. Safety was evaluated based on adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between study groups. The mean percentages of predicted FEV1 at baseline were 71.9 +/- 9.8 in patients receiving budesonide Turbuhaler and 70.6 +/- 11.0 in patients receiving placebo. Mean changes from baseline over the 12-week treatment period in FEV1 were significantly (P = 0.007) improved in patients receiving once-daily budesonide Turbuhaler compared with placebo (0.31 L and 0.17 L, respectively). Significant (P < or = 0.037) improvements over placebo also were observed in AM PEFR, nighttime/daytime asthma symptoms, and albuterol use with budesonide Turbuhaler treatment. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity and similar between study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide Turbuhaler 400 microg administered once daily in the AM is efficacious and safe for inhaled corticosteroid-naive asthmatic adults.

Budesonide for chronic asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Inhaled budesonide is a widely used inhaled corticosteroid for asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this review was to compare the efficacy of budesonide with placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group Trial Register and reference lists of articles was searched. We contacted trialists for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-1999).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing budesonide to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

43 studies met the inclusion criteria (2801 subjects). In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics, budesonide led to significant improvements in a number of measures of airway function. These included FEV1, Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 3.7% predicted (95% CI 0.1, 7.2%); improvement in morning peak flow (PEF) from baseline WMD 29 L/min (95% CI 22, 36 L/min); improvement in evening PEF from baseline WMD 21 L/min (95% CI 13, 29 L/min). Varying methods of reporting symptoms limited the pooling of studies but all high methodological quality studies demonstrated significant improvements compared to placebo. Health status was not reported. Risk of trial withdrawal due to asthma exacerbation was lower with budesonide compared to placebo, relative risk 0.17 (95% CI 0.09, 0.33). Doses of 500-800 mcg/d appeared to have slightly larger effect sizes than lower doses, but no advantage for high doses were apparent. A single high quality RCT reported significant reductions in daily prednisolone requirement and the number of patients able to discontinue prednisolone completely in budesonide treated subjects compared to placebo. No difference in risk of oropharyngeal soreness/hoarseness or oral Candidiasis was apparent for budesonide compared to placebo. Long-term risk of adrenal insufficiency was not reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

This review strongly supports use of budesonide in chronic asthma. Consensus guidelines for chronic asthma suggest titrating inhaled steroid dose to individual requirements. Evidence from this review of trials does not present a case for routine dose titration above 800 mcg/d.

Mometasone furoate administered once daily is as effective as twice-daily administration for treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Despite current recommendations, many patients with persistent asthma are still treated with bronchodilators alone.

OBJECTIVE

The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists.

METHODS

All patients (306 patients; age range, 12-70 years) were given a diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months before enrollment in this 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study. The primary efficacy variable was change in FEV(1) from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit).

RESULTS

At endpoint, FEV(1) was significantly improved (P < or =.02) after MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment and MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment (16.0% and 16.1%, respectively) compared with placebo (5.5%). The improvement seen with MF-DPI 200 microg once daily morning treatment (10.4%) was not significantly different from that with placebo. Secondary efficacy variables also showed significant improvement for the MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment group and the MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment group compared with the placebo group. All doses of MF administered by means of a DPI were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to demonstrate that a total daily dose of 400 microg of MF administered by means of a DPI is an effective treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. This treatment was equally effective when administered either as a once daily or twice daily regimen.

Efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily administration of budesonide by Turbuhaler(R) in children with stable asthma

We evaluated the efficacy of once-daily versus twice-daily treatment with budesonide, delivered by a Turbuhaler(R), in the management of children with stable asthma in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study involving 206 children (age 5-15 years). After a 2-week run-in period during which the children were maintained on their usual dose of budesonide (200 microg or 400 microg/day), patients were randomized to receive the same daily dose in either two daily administrations (morning and evening) or as a single dose in the morning over a period of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). The mean morning PEF during the run-in phase was 271 L/min in patients randomized to once-daily treatment and 264 L/min in those randomized to twice-daily treatment. The mean change from baseline to the last 2 weeks of the treatment period in the two groups was -0.3 L/min (95% confidence limits -6.6 to +6.0) and 2.5 L/min (-4.3 to +9.3). The estimated difference between the groups was -2.8 L/min, with 90% confidence limits of -10.4 + 4.5; these were close to the limits regarded as indicative of equivalence (-10 to +10), and hence the difference was not regarded as clinically relevant. Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in regard to secondary efficacy measures such as spirometric tests and symptom scores. Both treatments were well tolerated. We conclude that once-daily administration of budesonide by Turbuhaler(R) is as effective as twice-daily treatment in the management of stable asthma in children treated with inhaled steroids at doses of 200-400 microg/day.

Efficacy of once- and twice-daily administration of budesonide via Turbuhaler as initial therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma

Inhaled glucocorticosteroids such as budesonide have an important role in the management of asthma. Although these agents have traditionally been given twice daily, evidence is accumulating that once-daily treatment may be as effective as twice-daily administration. The efficacy of budesonide Turbuhaler (Astra, Lund, Sweden), 400 micrograms once daily in the evening or 200 micrograms twice daily, was compared in a randomized, double-blind study involving 181 patients (75 men, 106 women; mean age 30.8 years) with mild asthma [mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 92.8% pred.] who had not previously been treated with inhaled glucocorticosteroids. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomized to either regimen and treated for 6 weeks. This was followed by two 8-week open treatment periods, during which all patients received budesonide Turbuhaler, 200 micrograms once daily during the first period and 100 micrograms once daily during the second period. The mean change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the double-blind treatment period was 16.9 l min-1 in patients receiving once-daily treatment and 17.2 l min-1 in those receiving twice-daily treatment. Similarly, there were no significant differences in evening PEF, symptom scores, bronchodilator use or spirometry data between patients receiving once- and twice-daily treatments. The improvements in morning PEF, symptom scores and bronchodilator use seen during the double-blind treatment period were maintained during the two open treatment periods. It is concluded that once-daily treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler is as effective as an initial therapy twice-daily treatment in patients with mild persistent asthma and that the initial dose can be reduced to maintenance levels (including 100 micrograms) without loss of asthma control.

Once-daily budesonide in mild asthma

Inhaled steroid therapy is the most important treatment in the management of chronic asthma and currently twice-daily administration is recommended in mild to moderate asthma. Compliance is often a problem in asymptomatic patients and may lead to reduced disease control. Our aim was to investigate whether budesonide 0.2 mg once daily administered via the Turbuhaler is as effective as 0.1 mg twice daily. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group study was carried out in which 76 adult patients with mild to moderate asthma (FEV1 86% of predicted) were allocated to budesonide once or twice daily. After a run-in period of 2 weeks on present inhaled steroid treatment (0.2-0.5 mg day-1) there was an 8 week treatment period, followed by a washout period in which patients received no steroid for 4 weeks unless a drop in morning peak flow of at least 20% occurred or the use of beta 2-agonists increased by 50%. Both treatment groups improved minimally in peak flow (1.7 and 4.31 min-1 in the once-daily and twice-daily groups respectively) but the differences between the two groups were not significant. Testing the reverse hypothesis revealed clinical equivalence. The 90% confidence interval of the difference in the change of peak flow from run-in was between +30 and -30 l min-1, the limits deemed to be clinically relevant. There were no differences in symptom scores, beta 2-agonist use or spirometry measurements between the two groups. In the washout period there was a significant deterioration in peak flow and symptoms. This study shows that 0.2 mg budesonide given once a day is as affective as 0.1 mg given twice daily in patients with mild to moderate asthma.

Pulmicort Turbohaler once daily as initial prophylactic therapy for asthma

In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, 340 asthmatic patients aged 12-70 years received budesonide 400 micrograms once daily in the morning, budesonide 400 micrograms once daily in the evening, budesonide 200 micrograms twice daily or placebo, for 12 weeks in addition to inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonists used as required (p.r.n.). Budesonide was given as Pulmicort Turbohaler. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increased by 20 to 30 1 min-1 in each of the active treatment groups, significantly more than in the placebo group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the active treatment groups. Symptom improvement and decreased beta 2-agonist use reflected the PEFR data. Incidences of adverse events in the active treatment groups were similar to those observed in the placebo group. Budesonide 400 micrograms given once daily morning or evening is equieffective with the same total daily dose given twice daily in the treatment of mild to moderate stable asthmatics.

Balloon pulmonary valvotomy: palliation for cyanotic heart disease

Balloon pulmonary valvotomy was attempted in eight children with cyanotic congenital heart disease and pulmonic stenosis who were scheduled for a palliative procedure (shunt). In seven patients the balloon could be positioned across the pulmonary anulus, and valvotomy was performed. Five of the patients had tetralogy of Fallot with multiple levels of pulmonary outflow obstruction. For all patients in whom the balloon could be properly positioned the valvotomy was successful, as judged by arterial hemoglobin saturation, which increased from 72% +/- 5% to 83% +/- 5% (p less than .005). Valvotomy was followed by an immediate rise in mean pulmonary artery pressure (12.6 +/- 2.8 to 18.3 +/- 4.8 mm Hg, p less than 0.05) and a decline in hematocrit level at 2 months (54% +/- 5% to 47% +/- 4%, p less than 0.05). There was no mortality or complication from the valvotomy, and the need for a systemic to pulmonary artery shunt was eliminated in six of eight patients. Follow-up has ranged from 0.5 to 2.8 years. This trial indicates that balloon pulmonary valvotomy can be safely performed and is effective palliation in selected patients with cyanotic heart disease that is not suitable for primary repair. The increased pulmonary flow may improve oxygenation and growth of the pulmonary arteries without the need of a systemic to pulmonary artery shunt.

False left ventricular aneurysm as a complication of open heart surgery

A false aneurysm developed at the site of left ventricular venting in an 8-year-old boy who had undergone aortic valve commissurotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass. The diagnosis was made by clinical examination and chest radiography and confirmed by left ventricular cineangiography. The aneurysm was successfully resected.

Aneurysm of the Right Ventricle Caused by Selective Angiocardiography

Two cases are reported of aneurysm formation in the outflow tract and body of the right ventricle following selective angiocardiography. The technic and complications of angiocardiography in our hands have been reviewed, and it is concluded that there is no absolute means of preventing injections of contrast material into the wall of the ventricle, if multiple side hole catheters are used. It seems probably that single end hole catheters are safer than multiple side hole catheters for selective ventriculography.

The first patient developed a marked pulsation in the second and third left intercostal spaces together with changes in the plain x-ray that permitted a preoperative diagnosis of aneurysm. The second case was diagnosed at operation. The first patient developed variable cyanosis preoperatively, and during operative correction arterial desaturation together with hypotension. These changes were attributed to outflow tract obstruction by the aneurysm.

Experiences with 180 cases of tetralogy of Fallot in infants and children

Images