The erect abdominal radiograph in the acute abdomen: should its routine use be abandoned?

The effect of erect abdomen radiography on absorbed doses to internal organs and tissues: A clinical study

BACKGROUND

As low as reasonably achievable principles (ALARA) should be applied during all X-ray examinations. In some institutions, an acute abdomen series includes both erect and supine radiography. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of an erect position on absorbed dose to internal abdominal organs when compared with the supine position.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was undertaken where 81 patients were imaged in both supine and erect positions. The PCXMC Monte Carlo software was used to estimate individual organ doses using dose area product (DAP). Absorbed doses were calculated for the large intestines, active bone marrow, liver, lungs, small intestine, stomach, gallbladder, breasts, uterus, ovaries, urinary bladder, kidneys, testicles, and prostate.

RESULTS

The results showed a significant increase of absorbed dose by 1.4% when moving from a supine to an erect position. The testes were found to be the organs most affected by the erect position and then the urinary bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the study's findings, using the erect position during abdominal radiography increases the radiation dose for all of the selected organs compared to using a supine position. Therefore, it is advised that the use of erect abdomen radiography be restricted to certain circumstances.

Entrance Skin Dose (ESD) and Bucky Table Induced Backscattered Dose (BTI-BSD) in Abdominal Radiography With nanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter (OSLD)

In radiography, inconsistencies in patients' measured entrance skin dose (ESD) exist. There is no published research on the bucky table induced backscattered radiation dose (BTI-BSD). Thus, we aimed to ascertain ESD, calculate the BTI-BSD in abdominal radiography with a nanoDot OSLD, and compare the ESD results with the published data. A Kyoto Kagaku PBU-50 phantom (Kyoto, Japan) in an antero-posterior supine position was exposed, selecting a protocol used for abdominal radiography. The central ray of x-ray beam was pointed at the surface of abdomen at the navel, where a nanoDot dosimeter was placed to measure ESD. For the BTI-BSD, exit dose (ED) was determined by placing a second dosimeter on the exact opposite side (backside) of the phantom from the dosimeter used to determine (ESD) with and without bucky table at identical exposure parameters. The BTI-BSD was calculated as the difference between ED with and without bucky table. The ESD, ED, and BTI-BSD were measured in milligray (mGy). ESD mean values with and without bucky table were 1.97 mGy and 1.84 mGy, whereas ED values were 0.062 mGy and 0.052 mGy, respectively. Results show 2-26% lower ESD values with nanoDot OSLD. The BTI-BSD mean value was found to be approximately 0.01 mGy. A local dose reference level (LDRL) can be established using ESD data to safeguard patients from unnecessary radiation. In addition, to minimize the risk of BTI-BSD in patients in radiography, the search for the use or fabrication of a new, lower atomic number material for the bucky table is suggested.

Are We Following iRefer Guidelines From the Royal College of Radiology When Requesting Abdominal X-rays?

Background Abdominal radiography is one of the most routinely performed radiological investigations in hospitals. It is one of the initial investigations done in hospitals. Numerous studies have shown that abdominal X-rays have low sensitivity in several conditions such as acute abdominal pain. Methodology This study aims to first identify whether the Royal College of Radiology guidelines are being adhered to while requesting abdominal X-rays and, second, to identify the number of unnecessary requests made in the Betsi Cadwaladr health board. This is a retrospective audit of abdominal X-ray request data collected between the 1st and 23rd of August 2022. Data were collected from the electronic radiology record system. iRefer guidelines by the Royal College of Radiology were used as a reference to compare the requests made, and data were then analysed accordingly. Data are reported descriptively using percentages. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Of the total 242 abdominal X-rays noted, 89.67% of requests were according to the iRefer guidelines while 10.33% of requests were not. A total of 73.14% of cases were suspected to have an intestinal obstruction, and the positivity rate for the same was only 12.39%. Conclusions The majority of the requests followed the guidelines. However, there is an urgent need to develop local guidelines to reduce needless abdominal X-rays.

Diagnostic values of supine and erect abdominal radiographs for patients with acute abdomen: which is better for decision making?

BACKGROUND

Plain abdominal radiography including supine and erect abdominal radiographs (SAR and EAR) is a frequently used image modality for preliminary evaluation of acute abdomen. We aimed to explore which one of the SAR or EAR has a higher diagnostic value in overall diagnosis of acute abdomen, including their respective advantages over each other for the various underlying diseases.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the imaging findings of plain abdominal radiography of patients with acute abdomen who received abdominal computed tomography (CT) within 24 hours at the emergency department of a medical center in northern Taiwan between October 2019 and February 2020. Final diagnosis was made by CT reports and clinical data. The relevance between the imaging findings and clinical diagnosis in the groups of SAR and EAR were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 1009 cases with acute abdomen were included, of which 341 (33.8%) underwent EAR and 668 (66.2%) underwent SAR. Among them, 820 cases had final diagnosis confirmed by CT and clinical data. In comparison of the diagnostic relevance of SAR and EAR, there were no significant difference in the overall acute abdomen, but EAR showed a better diagnostic relevance in cases with bowel obstruction than SAR did (100% vs 87.2%, p < 0.05). No statistical difference in other abdominal diseases.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference between SAR and EAR in evaluation of overall acute abdomen. However, EARs has a diagnostic advantage over SAR for evaluation of suspected bowel obstruction.

Abdominal radiographs in the emergency department: current status and controversies

This editorial is discussing about the indiscriminate use of abdominal radiographs in the emergency department in general, with focus on value of the erect abdominal radiograph for the diagnosis of mechanical bowel obstruction and paralytic ileus.

The value of the erect abdominal radiograph for the diagnosis of mechanical bowel obstruction and paralytic ileus in adults presenting with acute abdominal pain

INTRODUCTION

There is discord on the value of the erect abdominal radiograph for diagnosing acute abdominal pathologies. The erect radiograph can be uncomfortable for patients in pain and increases patient radiation dose.

AIM

To determine if including the erect abdominal radiograph in plain abdominal radiography (PAR) improved diagnostic accuracy for identifying mechanical bowel obstruction and/or paralytic ileus in adults presenting with acute abdominal pain.

METHODS

PAR of 40 consecutive adults presenting with suspected bowel obstruction or paralytic ileus was retrospectively sampled and independently reviewed by two emergency department (ED) consultants and two radiology consultants for bowel obstruction and paralytic ileus across two sessions. In session 1, the assessors assessed the supine abdominal radiographs (PAR 1) and clinical details in a randomised order, and session 2, at least 6 weeks later, they assessed the supine and erect radiographs (PAR 2) and clinical details of the randomly re-ordered cases. Computed tomography was the reference standard. Pair-wise comparisons of receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess for significant differences in participants' diagnostic accuracy using MedCalc 16.4.3.

RESULTS

Average sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) were 69.7%, 61.0% and 0.642 for PAR 1, respectively, and 80.0%, 53.4% and 0.632 for PAR 2 respectively. For AUROC there were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between PAR 1 and PAR 2. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement improved in PAR 2.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy when including the erect radiograph in PAR for the acute abdomen.

Effectiveness of a radiation reduction campaign targeting children with gastrointestinal symptoms in a pediatric emergency department

Children feature more active cellular division and a smaller body area, which leads to a greater radiation dosage accumulation. We tried to reduce radiation hazards by reducing unnecessary radiological studies in a pediatric emergency department (PED) through the radiation reduction campaign.Our campaign involved a reduction from 2 (erect and supine) to 1 ordered abdominal plain radiograph (erect). This quasi-experimental, uncontrolled before-and-after study aimed to evaluate the campaign effect. We compared simple radiograph orders, length of stay (LOS) in PED, and return visit (RV) to PED between the before period (June 1, 2011-May 30, 2014) and the after period (June 1, 2014-May 30, 2015). Piecewise regression was used to assess rate differences between the periods.A total of 10,729 and 3515 patients were included before and after the campaign, respectively. During study periods, 9647 (90%) and 2710 (77%) total abdominal radiographs were ordered, respectively (rate difference = 13%; P < 0.001), and the slopes of rate changes were 0.03 and -0.71, respectively (P = 0.056). The total abdominal erect and supine film rate slope decreased from -0.19 to -2.86 (P = 0.004). The RV rate did not change (220 [2%] vs 56 [2%], respectively; P = 0.104). The slope of total RV rate changed from -0.01 to -0.05 (P = 0.132), and the slope of LOS changed from 0.001 to -0.352 (P = 0.243).The campaign to reduce abdominal radiograph orders in pediatric patients successfully reduced the abdominal plain film X-ray rate without on the RV rate and the LOS.

Multimodality approach for imaging of non-traumatic acute abdominal emergencies

"Acute abdomen" includes spectrum of medical and surgical conditions ranging from a less severe to life-threatening conditions in a patient presenting with severe abdominal pain that develops over a period of hours. Accurate and rapid diagnosis of these conditions helps in reducing related complications. Clinical assessment is often difficult due to availability of over-the-counter analgesics, leading to less specific physical findings. The key clinical decision is to determine whether surgical intervention is required. Laboratory and conventional radiographic findings are often non-specific. Thus, cross-sectional imaging plays a pivotal role for helping direct management of acute abdomen. Computed tomography is the primary imaging modality used for these cases due to fast image acquisition, although US is more specific for conditions such as acute cholecystitis. Magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound is very helpful in patients who are particularly sensitive to radiation exposure, such as pregnant women and pediatric patients. In addition, MRI is an excellent problem-solving modality in certain conditions such as assessment for choledocholithiasis in patients with right upper quadrant pain. In this review, we discuss a multimodality approach for the usual causes of non-traumatic acute abdomen including acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, cholecystitis, and small bowel obstruction. A brief review of other relatively less frequent but important causes of acute abdomen, such as perforated viscus and bowel ischemia, is also included.

The role of plain radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the added value of plain radiographs on top of clinical assessment in unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

In a multicenter prospective trial, patients with abdominal pain more than 2 hours and less than 5 days presented at the ED were evaluated clinically, and a diagnosis was made by the treating physician. Subsequently, all patients underwent supine abdominal and upright chest radiographs, after which the diagnosis was reassessed by the treating physician. A final (reference) diagnosis was assigned by an expert panel. The number of changes in the primary diagnosis, as well as the accuracy of these changes, was calculated. Changes in the level of confidence were evaluated for unchanged diagnoses.

RESULTS

Between March 2005 and November 2006, 1021 patients, 55% female, mean age 47 years (range, 19-94 years), were included. In 117 of 1021 patients, the diagnosis changed after plain radiographs, and this change was correct in 39 patients (22% of changed diagnoses and 4% of total study population). Overall, the clinical diagnosis was correct in 502 (49%) patients. The diagnosis after evaluation of the radiographs was correct in 514 (50%) patients, a nonsignificant difference (P = .14). In 65% of patients with unchanged diagnosis before and after plain radiography, the level of confidence of that diagnosis did not change either.

CONCLUSION

The added value of plain radiographs is too limited to advocate their routine use in the diagnostic workup of patients with acute abdominal pain, because few diagnoses change and the level of confidence were mostly not affected.

Adhesion-related small bowel obstruction

Postoperative adhesions are the commonest cause of small bowel obstruction (SBO), a frequent surgical emergency. Adhesion obstruction is potentially lethal and a crucial aspect in management is to differentiate whether there is actual, or impending, small bowel ischaemia and therefore a need for emergency surgery. There are no completely accurate imaging or haematological techniques to exclude the requirement for surgery. Modern computerized tomography (CT) has been a significant advance in noninvasive assessment of SBO and may demonstrate the cause of the obstruction and suggest the presence of bowel ischaemia. It is important to note that adhesions may not be the cause of SBO in a patient who has had abdominal surgery. Recurrent cancer, an obstructive colon lesion in the presence of an incompetent ileocaecal valve, an occult hernia, small bowel arterial or venous ischaemia, amongst others may be the cause and CT may elucidate some of these causes and help plan management. Increasing utilization of laparoscopic surgery may reduce the extent and incidence of adhesions and laparoscopic adhesiolysis, in experienced hands, may be successful in managing acute obstruction or alternatively as a planned procedure when the obstruction has resolved. Adhesive SBO remains a common surgical emergency and there is no substitute for repeated examination by a surgeon, capable of performing a laparotomy, in the optimal management of these complex patients.

Diagnostic value of plain abdominal radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain

OBJECTIVE

A prospective study was performed over a 3-month period in a tertiary referral centre to evaluate the appropriateness and contribution of plain abdominal radiographs (PAR) in the diagnosis and management of adult patients presenting with acute abdominal pain.

METHODS

Forward stepwise logistic regression was used to examine the correlation between PAR findings and the final diagnosis. The Chi-squared test was used to determine any changes in patient management including requirement for surgical intervention based on PAR findings (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Of 168 patients (246 PAR), 59 (35%) had positive findings on PAR. PAR were most sensitive in cases of intestinal obstruction (odds ratio, OR = 33.548, r = 0.561). The sensitivity was further increased if three of the following predictive signs were present: exaggerated bowel sounds (OR = 13.350, r = 0.154), abdominal distension (OR = 2.993, r = 0.234) and age over 50 years (OR = 2.301, r = 0.027). PAR were non-diagnostic in 82% of patients with acute abdominal pain (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PAR do not play a major role in influencing the management of patients with acute abdominal pain without coexisting bowel obstruction.

Imaging of colonic diverticular disease

Diverticular disease affects approximately two thirds of the population over the age of 70. While only a small fraction of these patients will develop diverticulitis, adequate radiological evaluation of diverticulitis and its complications is imperative in determining proper medical and surgical treatment. Clinical examination and laboratory tests alone have been found to be inaccurate in defining many aspects of the disease in up to 60% of cases. Over the past 30 years, contrast enema, computed tomography, and ultrasound have all been used extensively to diagnose the complications of diverticular disease. More recently, magnetic resonance imaging has been studied in patients with complicated diverticulitis. This article reviews the use of these different radiological modalities in diagnosing acute colonic diverticulitis and its complications.

A comparison of junior hospital doctors interpretation of acute radiographs using an X-ray box and a window

A statistically significant number of clinically important features are missed when radiographs are interpreted by holding an X-ray up against the window when compared with using an X-ray box. These findings are most probably accounted for by a quantifiable difference in light intensity.

A review of the management of small bowel obstruction. Members of the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study (SCAR)

Small bowel obstruction is a significant surgical problem and is commonly caused by postoperative adhesions. Patients suffering from this condition are often difficult to assess and require careful evaluation and management. Articles regarding the diagnosis, evaluation and management of small bowel obstruction have been identified from the Ovid, Embase and Silver Platter electronic databases and then reviewed by the authors. Particular emphasis has been placed on randomised controlled trials or large prospective series. Anecdotal reports or those containing small numbers have been largely excluded, but where they have been included it has been made clear in the text. The management of small bowel obstruction is predominantly the management of obstruction due to postoperative adhesions. The selective use of radiological techniques, such as water soluble contrast and CT studies, often help to characterise the nature of the obstruction and may even help with its resolution. Techniques involving the use of laparoscopy and barrier membranes may reduce morbidity but there is a need to evaluate these strategies further with prospective clinical trials.

Automated evidence-based critiquing of orders for abdominal radiographs: impact on utilization and appropriateness

OBJECTIVE

Inappropriate utilization of diagnostic testing has been well documented. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of presenting real time, evidence-based critiques about the appropriateness of abdominal radiograph (KUB) orders on physician decision making.

DESIGN

Prospective trial where evidence-based critiques were presented to ordering clinicians in two kinds of situations: (1) a KUB was likely to have a low probability of providing useful information, or (2) an alternative view(s) was more appropriate given the clinical circumstance. There were two phases of the trial: Phase 1 was a 9-week period where evidence-based critiques were presented at the time of ordering a KUB, followed by Phase 2, a 19-week period in which orderers were randomized to receive critiques either amended to include both institutional data regarding the utility of the critiques and stronger messages about the lack of utility of the study, or the same critiques as presented in Phase 1, depending upon indication. Based upon the radiologist's report of their interpretation of the exams, the results of the examinations were scored as positive, equivocal, or negative using structured criteria.

RESULTS

299 KUBs in Phase 1 and 385 KUBs in Phase 2 received at least one critique. Cancellation rates of low yield films were low, and were similar in Phase 1 and 2, 8/258 (3%) vs. 10/283 (4%). Compliance with the recommendation for alternative view(s) was higher: 19/104 (38%) in Phase 1 vs. 96/176 (55%) in Phase 2 (p = 0.006). The results differentiated low-yield from non-low-yield films: 5% of low-yield films vs. 20% of non-low-yield films were positive in Phase 2 (p < 0.0001). Surgical physicians were less likely to cancel (p = 0.07) or to change to the suggested view(s) (p < 0.0001) than medical physicians or nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention identified clinical situations in which KUBs appeared to have a low clinical yield. In response to evidence-based critiques, providers were reluctant to cancel their order, but were more willing to change to different views. To reduce the number of inappropriate radiographic films, stronger incentives or interventions may be required.

Radiographic imaging modalities for the patient in the emergency department with abdominal complaints

The emergency physician should be aware of the sensitivity and specificity of any radiologic study being considered. Radiographic examinations should be used to answer specific questions raised by the history and physical examination. The need to obtain a given radiologic evaluation should be based on the potential information it may reveal and the likelihood that this information will alter patient care. This cost-effective approach minimizes unnecessary radiation exposure and has been advocated by many authorities. The emergency physician should resist the "knee jerk" tendency to order radiographs to reassure himself or herself of the safety of the patient at discharge. Documentational and legal concerns are equally invalid reasons, as is the feeling that "it's what we always order for patients with this abdominal complaint." A given study may be indicated if the yield is acceptable and treatment of the patient may be altered by the results.

Posters for accident departments: simple method of sustaining reduction in x ray examinations

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a simple strategy would sustain a reduction in the number of unnecessary x ray examinations.

DESIGN

Use of posters to display guidelines encouraging the more effective use of radiology in patients with head injuries, twisted ankles, neck injuries, and abdominal pain.

SETTING

Accident department of a large metropolitan district general hospital.

PATIENTS

15,875 patients attending the accident department over two years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Proportion of patients having radiography.

RESULTS

Referrals for skull radiography fell from 56% to 20% and those for abdominal radiography fell from 31% to 7%. Referral patterns for adults attending with twisted ankles and cervical spine injuries did not change. Reductions were sustained over two years.

CONCLUSION

Carefully designed posters provide a simple method of reducing unnecessary x ray examinations.

Radiological investigation in acute diverticulitis

Optimal management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis depends on evaluation of the severity of the inflammatory process, in which radiological investigation is a useful but probably underutilized adjunct to clinical assessment. Plain abdominal radiography shows abnormalities in 30-50 per cent of patients but these tend to be non-specific and more accurate information is obtainable from a contrast enema. Although the quality of images produced by a water-soluble contrast agent is inferior to that with barium, the former is less hazardous in the presence of perforation and provides sufficient information to permit rational management decisions to be made. Ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) are particularly useful in visualizing abscesses. They may be helpful in following the progression or resolution of suppuration and in guiding percutaneous aspiration when appropriate. Despite early reports to the contrary, CT is no more specific than a contrast enema in the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis. Radionuclide scans have little role in the routine assessment of acute diverticulitis and magnetic resonance imaging has not been adequately evaluated. Water-soluble contrast enema is safe, widely available and probably the most useful early supplementary investigation.

Strategies for reducing inappropriate laparotomy rate in the acute abdomen

Images

The effect of radiology guidelines for general practitioners in Plymouth

The impact of introducing guidelines to General Practitioners using the radiodiagnostic services in the Plymouth Health District has been analysed. The guidelines were advisory and issued to all General Practitioners in the area served by the Plymouth group of hospitals. There was no vetting of requests from Practitioners following their introduction. Three 6 month periods were considered; two before the guidelines were introduced and one after. An overall reduction of 23% in referrals was achieved. An analysis by examination showed that only those examinations specifically targeted in the guidelines showed a significant reduction. In the case of targeted examinations, a reduction of 28% (P less than 0.001) was demonstrated.

Modern aids to clinical decision-making in the acute abdomen

Acute abdominal pain continues to provide not only a large workload for the general surgeon but also many diagnostic and management problems. Many different techniques have been introduced over the past two decades to help in the management of the acute abdomen and this review considers their relative claims to become incorporated into the process of clinical decision-making. The evidence in support of formally structured patient interview pathways with or without computer-aided diagnostic programs is now overwhelming and should become routine. Both laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology have an important role to play in the management of patients in whom the decision to operate is in doubt, and a combination of the two would be complementary. Ultrasonography has become increasingly popular for investigating the acute abdomen, and results from specialist centres are impressive. However, the problems of operator variation and the difficulties in providing a 24-h service will probably prevent it from becoming a first-line investigation in most hospitals. Although plain radiography has been available for many years, its routine use in the management of the acute abdomen remains controversial. Recent studies have confirmed that contrast radiography is an important adjunct to decision-making, particularly in the management of large bowel obstruction, and there is increasing evidence to support its use in suspected small bowel obstruction, perforated peptic ulcer and acute diverticular disease.

A critical appraisal of "out-of-hours" radiography in a major teaching hospital

The use of plain radiography performed outside normal working hours was studied at the Manchester Royal Infirmary to determine the costs of the service and where possible financial savings could be made. The annual cost of "out-of-hours" radiography was estimated to be in order of 250,000 pounds. During a selected 2-week period, 84% and 76% of all examinations performed on Accident and Emergency patients and inpatients, respectively, were found to be normal. Previous reports suggest that the number of radiographs requested in the Accident and Emergency department can be reduced without detriment to patients by the implementation of appropriate clinical guidelines. We consider that if similar guidelines were developed and applied to the use of out-of-hours radiography, substantial savings could be made. We estimate that in our hospital these savings could amount to 18% of the current expenditure on this service.

Plain abdominal radiographs and acute abdominal pain

The records of all (5080) patients presenting to a district general hospital with acute abdominal pain over a 4-year period were examined. The contribution of abdominal radiographs to the assessment of patients with suspected appendicitis, urinary tract infection, and non-specific abdominal pain was evaluated, these conditions accounting for 48 per cent of patients with abdominal pain and 32 per cent of those with abdominal radiographs. Any positive information from these radiographs was less likely to be helpful than incidental or inconsistent (and hence potentially misleading). Because of this high 'false positive' rate it is suggested that if the initial diagnosis is suspected appendicitis, urinary tract infection, or non-specific abdominal pain, there is little value in the routine use of abdominal radiographs.

Bowel tumour

Images