Computer control of anticoagulant dose for therapeutic management

Does telehealth improve anticoagulation management in patient service centers (PSC)? A pilot project

Anticoagulation Management Services (AMS) are known to improve warfarin management in the outpatient setting. The guideline recommendations are well established and indicate that patients who receive a Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) should be under the care of an experienced and specialized anticoagulation clinic (Lip et al. in Chest 154(5):1121-1201, 2018). Warfarin, a VKA, is considered a high risk medication and one of the most common causes of adverse events with poor patient outcomes. Anticoagulation care is assessed by measuring the percent of Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in patients receiving a VKA. Evidence shows that a 10% improvement in TTR has been associated with a 10% reduction in adverse event rates. Optimal management over usual medical care should prevent 7 myocardial infarctions, strokes, major bleeds, or deaths per 100 patients/year (Bussey et al. in Pharmacotherapy 9(4):214-219, 1989). Telehealth or telemedicine can be defined as the use of electronic information along with telecommunication technologies to provide medical services to individuals that are in remote locations from each other (Perednia in JAMA 273(6):483-488, 1995; Gray et al in J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019(48):690-693, 2019). This technology allows a provider located at a distant site to use two-way audio visual electronic communication to deliver clinical health care services to a patient who is located at an originating site (Kristian et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28(1):44-51, 2012; Testa and Zimmermann in Telemedicine for managing patients on oral anticoagulant, 2011; Telehealth Services in CMS Manual System Pub 100-04 medicare claims processing, 2019). The goals of the Telehealth Anticoagulation Management Service are to: (1) increase patient satisfaction (2) reduce turnaround time for results by providing the INR (International Normal Ratio) results in real time (3) increase patient compliance to INR testing and (4) improve system wide anticoagulation care by increasing cTTR (center Time in Therapeutic Range) metrics to high quality metrics of 65% and above. The overarching goal of our health system Telehealth program was to develop a collaborative care telemedicine INR model in collaboration with core laboratories (Patient Service Centers or PSCs) in order to improve patient quality metrics on warfarin. In this model, the Tele-ACTS Center (Telehealth Anticoagulation and Clinical Thrombosis Service) team was able to provide distant care for the outpatient population on warfarin maintenance therapy using a virtual telemedicine INR model located in a distant location to the PSC. Using this model, we were able to improve center-based TTR by 45.73%.

Moving towards ideal and appropriate models of anticoagulation management service

It is now known that thrombotic disorders such as venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction contribute significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulation service must respond to this new development. Warfarin has continued to provide the backbone for anticoagulation service for decades but with considerable drawbacks. The introduction of nonVitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has created new challenges. This article seeks to discuss how the establishment of appropriate models of anticoagulation could contain the draw backs of the old anticoagulants and improve on the compliance, availability, affordability, and accessibility of newer anticoagulants. Successful anticoagulation has always been defined by a scientific balancing of the risk of thrombosis and the complication of hemorrhage. To be able to maintain such optimal anticoagulation requires rational drug prescription (physician factor), institutelization of monitoring of therapy (anticoagulation clinic factor) as well as active participation of patients receiving therapy (patient factor). New models of service can be created out of this triad in a bid to replace the old routine medical care model. New models of anticoagulation service should include appropriately trained professionals such as Physicians, Pharmacists, Clinical Pharmacologists, Nurses, and Laboratory Scientists who are knowledgeable in diagnostic, management, and monitoring of anticoagulation. The different models of anticoagulation service discussed in this article clearly demonstrate the need for restructuring of this life saving service particularly in the era of NOAC. Newer models of care that should provide safe, efficacious, and cost-effective services are needed.

Moving anticoagulation initiation and monitoring services into the community: evaluation of the Brighton and hove community pharmacy service

BACKGROUND

As part of the NHS desire to move services closer to where people live, and provide greater accessibility and convenience to patients, Brighton and Hove Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) underwent a review of their anticoagulation services during 2008. The outcome was to shift the initiation and monitoring service in secondary care for non-complex patients, including domiciliary patients, into the community. This was achieved via a procurement process in 2008 resulting in the Community Pharmacy Anticoagulation Management Service (CPAMs) managed by Boots UK (a large chain of community pharmacies across the United Kingdom).

METHODS

This evaluation aims to review the outcomes (International Normalised Ratio [INR] readings) and experiences of those patients attending the anticoagulation monitoring service provided by community pharmacists in Brighton and Hove. All patients on warfarin are given a target INR range they need to achieve; dosing of and frequency of appointment are dependent on the INR result. Outcome measures for patients on the CPAM service included percentage INR readings that were within target range and the percentage time the patient was within therapeutic range. Data collected from 2009 to 2016 were analysed and results compared to the service targets. Patient experience of the service was evaluated via a locally developed questionnaire that was issued to patients annually in the pharmacy.

RESULTS

The evaluation shows that community pharmacy managed anticoagulation services can achieve outcomes at a level consistently exceeding national and local targets for both percentage INR readings in therapeutic target range (65.4%) compared to the recommended minimum therapeutic target range of 60.0% and percentage time in therapeutic range (72.5%, CI 71.9-73.1%) compared to the national target of 70.0%. Patients also indicated they were satisfied with the service, with over 98.6% patients rating the service as good, very good or excellent.

CONCLUSION

The Brighton and Hove CPAM service achieved above average national target management of INR and positive patient feedback, demonstrating that community pharmacy is ideally placed to provide this service safely and deliver enhanced clinical outcomes and positive patient experience.

Clinical Decision Support Tools: The Evolution of a Revolution

Dashboard systems for clinical decision support integrate data from multiple sources. These systems, the newest in a long line of dose calculators and other decision support tools, utilize Bayesian approaches to fully individualize dosing using information gathered through therapeutic drug monitoring. In the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease patients with infliximab, dashboards may reduce therapeutic failures and treatment costs. The history and future development of modern Bayesian dashboard systems is described.

Features of electronic health records necessary for the delivery of optimized anticoagulant therapy: consensus of the EHR Task Force of the New York State Anticoagulation Coalition

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulants are prescribed to millions of Americans, and consequently are among the medications most likely to contribute to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Although guidelines and consensus statements promote systematic approaches to therapy, anticoagulation (AC) management is often suboptimal. Electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to improve safety and quality but have not yet incorporated specialized features necessary to optimize therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To generate a comprehensive, consensus-based list of EHR features clinically necessary to deliver optimized AC management, provide a "language bridge" to accelerate incorporation of features into EHR systems, and suggest mechanisms for the objective evaluation of available EHRs.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of AC specialists utilized the framework of a previously published consensus statement to map outpatient AC management and developed a comprehensive array of sequential computer logic steps using a restricted language scheme. Logic steps were then translated into narrative descriptions of potential EHR features, which were refined through multiple group evaluations. A finalized list of proposed features was ranked according to perceived clinical necessity by physician, pharmacist, and nurse panelists in a blinded manner using a 5-point Likert scale. Features receiving no more than 1 dissenting opinion were included in a finalized list of clinically necessary features.

RESULTS

The task force generated 78 recommended EHR features across 20 key discrete areas and 425 individual logic steps. All recommended features received Strongly Agree or Agree rankings regarding their perceived clinical necessity, and no feature received more than a single Disagree response.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of key AC-related features into existing EHRs or specialized AC management systems has the potential to systematize the delivery of optimal AC care by health care professionals at the point of care. Optimized AC management has the potential to reduce adverse drug events associated with anticoagulant therapy in the outpatient setting.

Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The objective of this article is to summarize the published literature concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral anticoagulant drugs that are currently available for clinical use and other aspects related to their management.

METHODS

We carried out a standard review of published articles focusing on the laboratory and clinical characteristics of the vitamin K antagonists; the direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran etexilate; and the direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban

RESULTS

The antithrombotic effect of each oral anticoagulant drug, the interactions, and the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity are described in detail and discussed without providing specific recommendations. Moreover, we describe and discuss the clinical applications and optimal dosages of oral anticoagulant therapies, practical issues related to their initiation and monitoring, adverse events such as bleeding and other potential side effects, and available strategies for reversal.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large amount of evidence on laboratory and clinical characteristics of vitamin K antagonists. A growing body of evidence is becoming available on the first new oral anticoagulant drugs available for clinical use, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

"Zeus" a new oral anticoagulant therapy dosing algorithm: a cohort study

The demand for oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) has constantly increased during the last ten years with an extended use of computer assistance. Many mathematical algorithms have been projected to suggest doses and time to next visit for patients on OAT. We designed a new algorithm: "Zeus". A "before-after" study was planned to compare the efficacy and safety of this algorithm dosing OAT with manual dosage decided by the same expert physicians according to the target of International Normalized Ratio (INR). The study analysed data of 1876 patients managed with each of the two modalities for eight months, with an interval of two years between them. The aim was to verify the increased quality of therapy by time spent in INR target and efficiency and safety of Zeus algorithm. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher during the algorithm dosing period in comparison with the TTR during manual management period (62.3% vs 50.3%). The number of PT/INR tests above 5 was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced by algorithm suggested prescriptions in comparison with manual those (254 vs 537 times). The anticoagulant drug amount prescribed according to the algorithm suggestions was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower than that of the manual method. The number of clinical events observed in patients during the algorithm management time was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that in those managed with the manual dosage. This study confirms the clinical utility of the computer-assisted OAT and shows the efficacy and safety of the Zeus algorithm.

Development of a bayesian forecasting method for warfarin dose individualization

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a Bayesian dose individualization tool for warfarin. This was incorporated into the freely available software TCIWorks ( www.tciworks.info ) for use in the clinic.

METHODS

All pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PKPD) models for warfarin in the medical literature were identified and evaluated against two warfarin datasets. The model with the best external validity was used to develop an optimal design for Bayesian parameter control. The performance of this design was evaluated using simulation-estimation techniques. Finally, the model was implemented in TCIWorks.

RESULTS

A recently published warfarin KPD model was found to provide the best fit for the two external datasets. Optimal sampling days within the first 14 days of therapy were found to be days 3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 13 and 14. Simulations and parameter estimations suggested that the design will provide stable estimates of warfarin clearance and EC50. A single patient example showed the potential clinical utility of the method in TCIWorks.

CONCLUSIONS

A Bayesian dose individualization tool for warfarin was developed. Future research to assess the predictive performance of the tool in warfarin patients is required.

An evaluation of near-patient testing of anticoagulant control in general practice

PURPOSE

This paper aims to compare anticoagulant management in secondary care for the year prior to the introduction of near-patient testing in a general practice, and in the subsequent year after it was introduced.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

This paper is a retrospective, paired before-after study. Details of test results in the two-year-long periods on the 46 patients who met the inclusion criteria were collected and analysed pairwise.

FINDINGS

Despite an increase in the frequency of testing this set of patients were controlled as well in general practice as they had been with a secondary-care service, and better that in a number of studies in the literature.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS

This research reviews a recently introduced service at a single centre. Further research of patient satisfaction and adverse events in a multi-centre longer-term trial are desirable.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Technology now allows the increasing amount of individuals on anticoagualtion to be controlled with near-patient testing in general practice. This study shows that satisfactory control can be maintained in patients who transfer from a secondary care-based to a primary care-based service.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

This paper demonstrates that a single general practice can provide a high quality anticoagulant service using near-patient testing and computer-based decision support. This adds to the already available evidence and will hopefully encourage other practices to adopt the same.

The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted anticoagulant dosage: results from the European Action on Anticoagulation (EAA) multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Increased demand for oral anticoagulation has resulted in wider adoption of computer-assisted dosing in anticoagulant clinics. An economic evaluation has been performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted dosing in comparison with manual dosing in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy.

METHODS

A trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted as part of the EAA randomized study of computer-assisted dosage vs. manual dosing. The 4.5-year multinational trial was conducted in 32 centres with 13 219 anticoagulation patients randomized to manual or computer-assisted dosage. The main outcome measures were total health care costs, clinical event rates and cost-saving per clinical event prevented by computer dosing compared with manual dosing.

RESULTS

Mean dosing costs per patient were lower (difference: euro47) for computer-assisted dosing, but with little difference in clinical event costs. Total overall costs were euro51 lower in the computer-assisted dosing arm. There were a larger number of clinical events in the manual dosing arm. The overall difference between trial arms was not significant (difference in clinical events, -0.003; 95% CI, -0.010-0.004) but there was a significant reduction in events with DVT/PE, suggesting computer-assisted dosage with the two study programs (dawn ac or parma 5) was at least as effective clinically as manual dosage. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that computer-assisted dosing is less costly than manual dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that computer-assisted dosage with the two programs (dawn ac and parma 5) is cheaper than manual dosage and is at least as effective clinically, indicating that investment in this technology represents value for money.

Single-dose adjustment versus no adjustment of warfarin in stably anticoagulated patients with an occasional international normalized ratio (INR) out of range

BACKGROUND

Well-controlled patients on warfarin may still have occasional International Normalized Ratios (INRs) outside the therapeutic range. It is unclear whether there is any benefit of a single-dose correction in this situation.

AIM

To evaluate whether patients with very stable INR results should continue with the maintenance dose of warfarin without a single-dose correction, even when the result unexpectedly is moderately below or above the therapeutic range.

METHODS

A) We reviewed retrospectively 364 patients with unchanged maintenance dose for at least 6 months and an occasional INR outside the therapeutic range regarding decision on dosing and the effect on the next INR. B) We randomized 160 patients with at least 3 months of unchanged maintenance dose, an occasional INR deviating to a minimum of 1.5 or a maximum of 4.4 and unexplained or temporary, removable cause to a single-dose Change or No change. Follow-up INRs and telephone interviews were obtained after 2 weeks.

RESULTS

A) Retrospectively, the proportion of follow-up INRs outside the therapeutic range was 29.9% after No change, 27.1% after Increased dose and 25.7% after Skipped/reduced dose. However, the decision on No change was mainly taken in case of minimal INR deviations. B) Forty-eight (60%) of the patients randomized to Change were within the therapeutic range at follow-up versus 45 (56%) of those with No change, odds ratio 1.17 (95% confidence interval 0.59-2.30). For baseline INRs deviating down to 1.6 or up to 3.6 (therapeutic range, INR 2.0-3.0) the 2-week INRs did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest only a small or no difference between the two managements of an occasional INR out of range in terms of the 2-week follow-up INR. In stable patients on warfarin with an occasional INR outside the therapeutic range it seems reasonable to continue with the same dose without a single-dose change and perform a repeat test in about 2 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00814177.).

Measuring quality of oral anticoagulation care: extending quality measurement to a new field

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulation with warfarin is an increasingly common medical intervention. Despite its efficacy, warfarin is difficult to manage, contributing to potential for patient harm. Efforts to measure the quality of oral anticoagulation care have focused disproportionately on the identification of ideal candidates for warfarin therapy, with comparatively little effort in measuring the quality of oral anticoagulation care once therapy has begun. To address this gap in the literature, a MEDLINE search was conducted for all papers relevant to possible quality measures in oral anticoagulation care, including measures of structure, process, and outcomes of care.

LIMITATIONS, CONCERNS, AND CHALLENGES OF QUALITY MEASUREMENT IN ORAL ANTICOAGULATION

Because they do not have intrinsic significance, measures of structure and process should be strongly related to outcomes that matter to merit our interest. Consensus guidelines may provide useful guidance to practicing clinicians but may not represent valid process measures. Outcome measures must be studied with databases that provide sufficient statistical power to reliably demonstrate real differences between providers or sites of care.

CONCLUSION

Oral anticoagulation care, a common and serious condition, is in need of a program of quality measurement. This article suggests a research agenda to begin such a program. Previous research has established the evidence for anticoagulant therapy across a broad spectrum of indications and has helped to achieve consensus on the optimal target intensity for various indications. The next task will be to use this body of evidence to develop valid measures of the structure, process, and outcomes of oral anticoagulation care. Quality indicators provide a framework for quality improvement, two goals of which are to maximize the effectiveness of therapy and to minimize harm.

Warfarin dose management affects INR control

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how patterns of warfarin dose management contribute to percentage time in the therapeutic International Normalized Ratio (INR) range (TTR).

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the contribution of warfarin dose management to TTR and to define an optimal dose management strategy.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We enrolled 3961 patients receiving warfarin from 94 community-based clinics. We derived and validated a model for the probability of a warfarin dose change under various conditions. For each patient, we computed an observed minus expected (O - E) score, comparing the number of dose changes predicted by our model to the number of changes observed. We examined the ability of O - E scores to predict TTR, and simulated various dose management strategies in the context of our model.

RESULTS

Patients were observed for a mean of 15.2 months. Patients who deviated the least from the predicted number of dose changes achieved the best INR control (mean TTR 70.1% unadjusted); patients with greater deviations had lower TTR (65.8% and 62.0% for fewer and more dose changes respectively, Bonferroni-adjusted P < 0.05/3 for both comparisons). On average, clinicians in our study changed the dose when the INR was 1.8 or lower/3.2 or higher (mean TTR: 68%); optimal management would have been to change the dose when the INR was 1.7 or lower/3.3 or higher (predicted TTR: 74%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our observational study suggests that INR control could be improved considerably by changing the warfarin dose only when the INR is 1.7 or lower/3.3 or higher. This should be confirmed in a randomized trial.

Pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is part of the American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the antithrombotic effect of the VKAs, the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity, and the clinical applications of VKA therapy and provides specific management recommendations. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do or do not outweigh the risks, burdens, and costs. Grade 2 recommendations suggest that the individual patient's values may lead to different choices. (For a full understanding of the grading, see the "Grades of Recommendation" chapter by Guyatt et al, CHEST 2008; 133:123S-131S.) Among the key recommendations in this article are the following: for dosing of VKAs, we recommend the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy, with doses between 5 mg and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 1B); we suggest against pharmacogenetic-based dosing until randomized data indicate that it is beneficial (Grade 2C); and in elderly and other patient subgroups who are debilitated or malnourished, we recommend a starting dose of < or = 5 mg (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with nontherapeutic INRs, with INRs above the therapeutic range, and with bleeding whether the INR is therapeutic or elevated. For the use of vitamin K to reverse a mildly elevated INR, we recommend oral rather than subcutaneous administration (Grade 1A). For patients with life-threatening bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage, we recommend the use of prothrombin complex concentrates or recombinant factor VIIa to immediately reverse the INR (Grade 1C). For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we recommend a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 1A]. We recommend that physicians who manage oral anticoagulation therapy do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion, incorporating patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, follow-up, and good patient communication of results and dose adjustments [Grade 1B]. In patients who are suitably selected and trained, patient self-testing or patient self-management of dosing are effective alternative treatment models that result in improved quality of anticoagulation management, with greater time in the therapeutic range and fewer adverse events. Patient self-monitoring or self-management, however, is a choice made by patients and physicians that depends on many factors. We suggest that such therapeutic management be implemented where suitable (Grade 2B).

A mainframe interfacing computer management system for the control of oral anticoagulant therapy

A unique computerized management system has been used to control the anticoagulation of over 400 patients at a large teaching hospital for the last eighteen months. The system is located on the main pathology computer which can be interfaced with the patient administration system (PAS). This enables files in the anticoagulant program to be linked with files in the PAS and files in the haematology database. This system has many advantages over a stand-alone microcomputer system and will form the basis for the next generation of computerized anticoagulant management systems.

An international multicenter randomized study of computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage vs. medical staff dosage

BACKGROUND

Increased demand for oral anticoagulants is overwhelming facilities worldwide, resulting in increasing use of computer assistance. A multicenter clinical endpoint study has been performed to compare the safety and effectiveness of computer-assisted dosage with dosage by experienced medical staff at the same centers.

METHODS

A randomized study of dosage of two commercial computer-assisted dosage programs (PARMA 5 and DAWN AC) vs. manual dosage at 32 centers with an established interest in oral anticoagulation in 13 countries. The aim was to recruit a minimum of 16,000 patient-years randomized to medical staff or computer-assisted dosage. In total, 13,219 patients participated, 6503 patients being randomized to medical staff and 6716 to computer-assisted dosage. The safety and effectiveness of computer-assisted dosage were compared with those of medical staff dosage.

RESULTS

In total, 13,052 patients were recruited (18,617 patient-years). International Normalized Ratio (INR) tests numbered 193 890 with manual dosage and 193,424 with computer-assisted dosage. The number of clinical events with computer-assisted dosage was lower (P = 0.1), but in the 3209 patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, they were reduced by 37 (24%, P = 0.001). Time in target INR range was significantly improved by computer assistance as compared with medical staff dosage at the majority of centers (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of computer-assisted dosage has been demonstrated using two different marketed programs in comparison with experienced medical staff dosage at the centers with established interest in anticoagulation. Significant prevention of clinical events in patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism and the achievement of target INR in all clinical groups has been observed. The reliability and safety of other marketed computer-assisted dosage programs need to be established.

Oral anticoagulation control: the European perspective

We describe the results of a novel complete care package using point-of-care INR testing and computerized decision support for the management of oral anticoagulation by nurse-led primary care clinics in the United Kingdom. We found such therapy to be as safe and effective as traditional hospital-based care for oral anticoagulation in the UK as determined by adverse events or International Normalized Ratio (INR) time in range. We then review the literature as it pertains to the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of patient self-management with point-of-care INR testing at home and discuss the implications for such care in the UK.

Management of oral anticoagulation in a population of children with cardiac disease using a computerised system to support decision-making

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a computerised system to support decision-making concerning the management of warfarin used in maintenance of anti-coagulation.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series study comparing manual and computerised records of prescribing.

SETTING

A tertiary paediatric cardiology department in a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The 26 children receiving warfarin to maintain anticoagulation at the time of introduction of a computerised system to support decision-making.

INTERVENTIONS

A rules-based computerised system to support decisions, based on existing departmental guidelines, for management of anticoagulation using warfarin was introduced to aid prescribing physicians.

MAIN OUTCOMES

We assessed the stability of the International Normalised Ratio, along with the number of checks made of the ratio, and the adjustments of dosage. Dosages, and recheck interval prescriptions, were compared to the guidelines established by our department.

RESULTS

We compared 274 prescriptions made manually, and 608 made using the computerised system to support decision-making, covering periods of 4, and 11, months respectively. The mean proportion of time spent by the patients within their target range for the International ratio was maintained during the period studied, at 76 percent versus 79 percent (p = 0.79). The median number of checks of the ratio made for each patient over a period of 28 days was unchanged, at 1.9 versus 2.1 (p = 0.58). There was a significant change in prescribing practices, which more closely followed the departmental guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a computerised system to support decision-making maintained the stability of the International ratio using warfarin, without increasing the number of checks or adjustments of dosages, in a point-of-care service for anticoagulation in children.

Anticoagulant Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Venous thrombosis is a common disease. As the mean age of the population increases, so does the incidence of venous thromboembolism. Anticoagulant therapy is equally effective in young and older patients, and can reduce substantially the associated morbidity and mortality. When considering long-term oral anticoagulant therapy in older patients, however, careful ongoing evaluation is imperative to ensure that the risk of bleeding does not outweigh the antithrombotic benefits.

Efficacy of computer-aided dosing of warfarin among patients in a rehabilitation hospital

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether computer-aided dosing of warfarin is superior to physician dosing to maintain a patient in a rehabilitation hospital within a target international normalized ratio goal.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial in an inpatient rehabilitation hospital. A total of 30 consecutive patients admitted receiving warfarin were randomized to either clinician dosing or computer-aided warfarin dosing for the duration of their hospitalization. The main outcome measures included the percentage of days in a therapeutic anticoagulation range and the number of blood draws. Exclusion criteria included short length of stay (n=110, 39%) and a physician declared international normalized ratio target range of <2.0 (n=67, 23%). A total of 73 patients were excluded because of heme-positive stools at admission, recent gastrointestinal bleed, early discharge or consent refusal. Dawn AC software was used to determine warfarin dosage and frequency of blood draws to maintain a target international normalized ratio of 2.0-3.0 for the computer-dosed group (n=14). Several physicians recommended warfarin dosages for the second group (n=16). Two were dropped from the computer model secondary to lost data files for these two patients.

RESULTS

Computer-aided dosing of warfarin resulted in 61.7% of days within the therapeutic range (international normalized ratio, 2-3), whereas clinician dosing resulted in only 44.1%. There were no significant differences in the number of blood draws or demographic variables between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Computers were significantly better at maintaining patients within a therapeutic international normalized ratio range than physicians. There were no significant differences in the number of recommended blood draws.

A model-based algorithm for the monitoring of long-term anticoagulation therapy

It has been shown that computerized algorithms for the prescription of coumarin derivates can improve the quality of long-term anticoagulation treatment. These algorithms are usually based on an empiric relationship between dosage and International Normalized Ratio and do not quantify the delaying effect of the drug's pharmacokinetics or the effect of alternating doses that are used to approximate a certain average dosage. Our objective was to develop a mathematical model that takes into account these effects and to develop a new algorithm based on this model that can be used to further optimize the quality of long-term anticoagulation treatment. We simplified a general model structure that was proposed by Holford in 1986 so that the parameters can be estimated using data that are available during long-term anticoagulation treatment. The constant parameters in the model were estimated separately for phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol using data from 1279 treatment courses from three different anticoagulation clinics in the Netherlands. The only variable parameter in the model is the sensitivity of the patient, which is estimated during the course of each treatment. A total of 194 dosage and appointment intervals that were proposed by the new algorithm were scored as 'good', 'acceptable', or 'bad' by two dosing experts. One hundred and seventy-eight (91.8%) proposals were considered good by at least one expert and bad by none. In 39 cases the experts disagreed. We believe that this algorithm will allow further improvement of anticoagulation treatments.

Computer Assisted Anticoagulant Therapy

The constantly workload increase has led to the development of Computerised Decision Support Systems (CDSS) for a better management of patient care. Many clinical situations have been investigated to verify the utility of CDSS: few have demonstrated stable effects. One area where success has been reported is the field of oral anticoagulation management. CDSS system has demonstrated to be able to improve the treatment quality in comparison to manual method. In the future scenario of oral anticoagulant management CDSS will have a pivotal part, the constant increase of patients number and their pressure on thrombosis centres had led to the development of alternative models for delivery OAT: Primary care, General Practitioner, Patient self testing and self management and the use of CDSS has been central to the decentralisation process and may be useful in maintaining the efficacy and quality of anticoagulant control. GP with the aid of CDSS are able to deliver OAT as well as expert physician of Thrombosis Centre in terms of time spent by patient in therapeutic range.

The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This article concerning the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. The article describes the antithrombotic effect of VKAs, the monitoring of anticoagulation intensity, the clinical applications of VKA therapy, and the optimal therapeutic range of VKAs, and provides specific management recommendations. Grade 1 recommendations are strong, and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh the risks, burdens, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient's values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this article are the following: for dosing of VKAs, we suggest the initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy with doses between 5 and 10 mg for the first 1 or 2 days for most individuals, with subsequent dosing based on the international normalized ratio (INR) response (Grade 2B). In the elderly and in other patient subgroups with an elevated bleeding risk, we suggest a starting dose at < or = 5 mg (Grade 2C). We recommend basing subsequent doses after the initial two or three doses on the results of INR monitoring (Grade 1C). The article also includes several specific recommendations for the management of patients with INRs above the therapeutic range and for patients requiring invasive procedures. For example, in patients with mild to moderately elevated INRs without major bleeding, we suggest that when vitamin K is to be given it be administered orally rather than subcutaneously (Grade 1A). For the management of patients with a low risk of thromboembolism, we suggest stopping warfarin therapy approximately 4 days before they undergo surgery (Grade 2C). For patients with a high risk of thromboembolism, we suggest stopping warfarin therapy approximately 4 days before surgery, to allow the INR to return to normal, and beginning therapy with full-dose unfractionated heparin or full-dose low-molecular-weight heparin as the INR falls (Grade 2C). In patients undergoing dental procedures, we suggest the use of tranexamic acid mouthwash (Grade 2B) or epsilon amino caproic acid mouthwash without interrupting anticoagulant therapy (Grade 2B) if there is a concern for local bleeding. For most patients who have a lupus inhibitor, we suggest a therapeutic target INR of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0) [Grade 2B]. In patients with recurrent thromboembolic events with a therapeutic INR or other additional risk factors, we suggest a target INR of 3.0 (range, 2.5 to 3.5) [Grade 2C]. As models of anticoagulation monitoring and management, we recommend that clinicians incorporate patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, and follow-up, and good communication with patients concerning results and dosing decisions (Grade 1C+).

External quality assessment for warfarin dosing using computerised decision support software

AIM

To establish and evaluate an external quality assessment scheme for warfarin dosing for users of a computerised decision support system, BAP-PC.

DESIGN

Analysis of 12 months of clinical data from 10 primary care centres using BAP-PC within an oral anticoagulation clinic. Data were analysed for individual centres and compared with aggregated data for all practices. Individual feedback forms were provided to participating centres.

RESULTS

A total patient population of 367 (range, 17-65/centre) was analysed. On average, patients spent 69% of time in the therapeutic range (range, 60-76%). Patients were seen on average every 27 days (range, 24-30). The average point prevalence was 86% (range, 76-100%). In total, 33 adverse events were reported (0-13/practice). Serious adverse events ranged from 0 to 1 for each practice. This translates into a serious adverse event rate of 1.6/100 patient years.

CONCLUSIONS

Practices were successful in maintaining good therapeutic international normalised ratio control, with centres achieving 60% or higher time in range. There are some doubts about the quality of data collection at a practice level because there were no reported events in half of the participating centres. The observed event rates do concur with previously reported data, however. Further cycles of the scheme are necessary to establish it as a useful research and benchmarking tool.

Warfarin dose reduction vs watchful waiting for mild elevations in the international normalized ratio

BACKGROUND

Whether clinicians should decrease the warfarin dose in response to a mild, asymptomatic elevation in the international normalized ratio (INR) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The study objectives were as follows: (1) to evaluate the safety of an anticoagulation service (ACS) policy advocating that the warfarin dose not be changed for isolated, asymptomatic INRs of < or = 3.4; (2) to compare the dosing strategies of an ACS and primary care providers (PCPs); and (3) to quantify the relationship between reduction of the warfarin dose and the subsequent fall in the INR.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomized controlled study of health maintenance organization outpatients who were receiving warfarin.

PATIENTS

We identified 231 patients with a target INR of 2.5 and an isolated, asymptomatic INR between 3.2 and 3.4. Our ACS monitored 103 of the patients; PCPs monitored the remaining 128 patients.

MEASUREMENTS

From all 231 patients, we obtained INRs and warfarin dosing history. From the 103 ACS enrollees, we also recorded adverse events.

RESULTS

One ACS patient had epistaxis in the 30 days after the elevated INR. Twenty-three percent of ACS enrollees and 47% of PCP patients reduced their warfarin dose (p < 0.001). The median follow-up INRs were similar in both cohorts: 2.7 in the ACS enrollees and 2.6 in the PCP patients. However, in a subgroup analysis of 190 patients who presented with an INR of 3.2 or 3.3, ACS enrollees were more likely to have a follow-up INR in the range of 2 to 3 (p = 0.03). The median follow-up INR was 2.7 in 148 patients who maintained their warfarin dose, 2.5 in 77 patients who decreased their dose by 1 to 20%, and 1.7 in 6 patients who decreased their dose by 21 to 43% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support maintaining the same warfarin dose in asymptomatic patients with an INR of < or = 3.3, and reducing the dose for patients who have a greater INR or an increased risk of hemorrhage. Warfarin dose reductions > 20% should be avoided for mildly elevated INRs.

Anticoagulation therapy

Despite refinements and standardization in the use of anticoagulants, many problems remain for clinicians. Dr. Crowther describes appropriate starting and maintenance doses of warfarin, factors accounting for inter- and intra-observer variability and importantly, the management of the over-anticoagulated patients and bleeding patients. Dr. White compares unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and addresses whether there truly are differences in the efficacy and safety of different LMWH's for both arterial and venous indications. Dr. Ortel discusses the management of the problem patient who requires anticoagulants, the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, the pregnant patient, the obese patient, patients who have renal insufficiency and/or liver disease, patients with malignant disease, and other challenging patient populations.

Establishing and running an effective telephone-based anticoagulation service

Observational studies and randomized controlled trials have revealed improvement in international normalized ratio (INR) control and reduced thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in patients taking warfarin who are managed by an anticoagulation service (ACS) compared with traditional physician care. In this article, we describe how to establish a multidisciplinary telephone-based ACS to monitor INRs, dose warfarin, and heparin therapy, and to educate patients by telephone. We address how to improve ACS efficiency by using an electronic medical record, charting by exception, holding group-based education, communicating by telephone, and conducting quality assurance. We also make recommendations for improving the quality of care of patients taking anticoagulants that can be implemented in any setting and we discuss how to apply these guidelines to other remote disease-state management programs (eg, diabetes).

Prediction of fluindione maintenance dosage hampered by large intraindividual variability

In a previous study, the authors proposed a method to individualize fluindione dosage regimen, based on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model describing the evolution of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). In this method, daily maintenance dosage for a target INR depends on the product of individual Cl and C50. The present work shows the results of a follow-up study in 50 patients for whom target INR was 2.5. INR measurements and dosage regimens were recorded both during hospital stay and during the 1st month of treatment. Patients were defined as equilibrated after 1 month if the last two INRs were in the range 1.5-3.5 under a stable dosage regimen. Actual maintenance dose was compared with the dose predicted using the three first INRs measured in the hospital. Intraindividual variability of Cl*C50 between hospital stay and after 1 month was evaluated. After 1 month, only 27 patients (54%) were equilibrated. Actual maintenance dose varied from 5 to 30 mg daily. There was no bias between predicted and actual maintenance dose (1.4 mg), but a large root mean squared error (8 mg) was found. The intraindividual variability in Cl*C50 between hospital and maintenance regimen was high (93%), which may explain the dispersion in the predicted maintenance dose.

Anticoagulation management in primary care: a trial-based economic evaluation

The demand for anticoagulation management is increasing because of a widening of the indications of treatment. A primary care clinic using near-patient testing and computer decision support software is one model of care to meet this increased demand. The study aimed to determine the cost and cost-effectiveness of primary care-based anticoagulation management in comparison with 'traditional' hospital care-based provision by means of a cost-effectiveness analysis using data from a Birmingham-based multicentre randomized controlled trial. The costs per patient per year in primary care were pound170 [95% confidence interval (CI) pound149-190] vs. pound69 (95% CI pound57-81). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the cost in primary care could be reduced to under pound100 per patient per year under plausible changes in the variables. Primary care provides similar levels of control to secondary care for patients on anticoagulation therapy. There is an increased cost of managing patients in primary care and at no point did primary care become a lower cost option than secondary care. Local decision-makers need to assess the increased cost of primary care anticoagulation management in terms of the potential reductions in high-cost serious adverse events.

Management and dosing of warfarin therapy

When initiating warfarin therapy, clinicians should avoid loading doses that can raise the International Normalized Ratio (INR) excessively; instead, warfarin should be initiated with a 5-mg dose (or 2 to 4 mg in the very elderly). With a 5-mg initial dose, the INR will not rise appreciably in the first 24 hours, except in rare patients who will ultimately require a very small daily dose (0.5 to 2.0 mg). Adjusting a steady-state warfarin dose depends on the measured INR values and clinical factors: the dose does not need to be adjusted for a single INR that is slightly out of range, and most changes should alter the total weekly dose by 5% to 20%. The INR should be monitored frequently (eg, 2 to 4 times per week) immediately after initiation of warfarin; subsequently, the interval between INR tests can be lengthened gradually (up to a maximum of 4 to 6 weeks) in patients with stable INR values. Patients who have an elevated INR will need more frequent testing and may also require vitamin K1. For example, a nonbleeding patient with an INR of 9 can be given low-dose vitamin K1 (eg, 2.5 mg phytonadione, by mouth). Patients who have an excessive INR with clinically important bleeding require clotting factors (eg, fresh-frozen plasma) as well as vitamin K1.

Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

The demand for anticoagulant treatment is increasing. We compared the benefits of computer-generated anticoagulant dosing with traditional dosing decided by experienced medical staff in achieving target international normalised ratios (INRs).

METHODS

In five European centres we randomly assigned 285 patients in the stabilisation period and stabilised patients to the computer-generated-dose group (n=137) or traditional-dose group (n=148). Centres had a specialist interest in oral anticoagulation but no previous experience with computer-generated dosing. The computer program calculated doses and times to next visit. Our main endpoint was time spent in target INR range (Rosendaal method).

FINDINGS

For all patients combined, computer-generated dosing was significantly beneficial overall in achieving target INR (p=0.004). The mean time within target INR range for all patients and all ranges was 63.3% (SD 28.0) of days in the computer-generated-dose group compared with 53.2% (27.7) in the traditional-dose group. For the stabilisation patients alone, computer-generated doses led to a non-significant benefit in all INR ranges (p=0.06), whereas in the stable patients the benefit was significant (p=0.02).

INTERPRETATION

The computer program gave better INR control than the experienced medical staff and at least similar standards to the specialised centres should be generally available. Clinical outcome and cost effectiveness remain to be assessed.

Review of computerized decision support systems for oral anticoagulation management

Computerized decision support systems (CDSS) are available to assist clinicians in the therapeutic management of oral anticoagulation. We report the findings relating to CDSS for oral anticoagulation management of a primary-care-based systematic review which largely focused on near-patient testing. Seven papers were reviewed which covered four different systems. The methodology of these papers was generally poor, although one randomized controlled trial showed improved therapeutic control associated with computerized management compared with human performance.