Coronary heart disease and elderly people

Prevention of coronary heart disease. Part II. Secondary prevention, detection of subclinical disease, and emerging risk factors

The prevention of CHD should be a major priority among primary care physicians and subspecialists who have any dealing with the cardiovascular system. There is ample evidence from epidemiologic studies for the impact of specific risk factors on CHD events. There is also ample evidence from observational studies and clinical trials that interventions of lifestyle and pharmacologic therapy can decrease morbidity and mortality from CHD before or after the first event. It behooves the physician who wishes to practice good medicine to understand the pathophysiologic roles of the risk factors and the evidence from epidemiologic studies and clinical trials for their association with cardiovascular disease. It is important to determine the efficacy of interventions, both lifestyle and pharmacologic, in modifying CHD risk. To be effective in doing so, the practicing physician has to have the motivation to determine target goals for risk factor modification in each patient, to understand the patient's own motivations in modifying risk factors, and to define clearly with the patient the expectations of such interventions. Although there are guidelines for risk factor modification in modification of cholesterol and in hypertension, the periodic renewal of these guidelines reflects the changing concepts of risk and its modification. A cardiovascular risk factor intervention categorization is presented in Table 12. The physician must be convinced that such intervention is beneficial to the patient, cost-effective, and thus fulfills the expectations of medical practice. The practice of medicine in the evaluation and treatment of coronary heart disease has always been challenging and stimulating. The prevention of CAD disease should ultimately provide the greatest accomplishment.

Coronary heart disease risk factors in men and women aged 60 years and older: findings from the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program

BACKGROUND

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common cause of death in men and women aged 60 years and older. Although a number of studies support the concept that CHD risk factors that have been defined in younger adults are significantly associated with CHD events in older adults, others do not support this thesis, and further definition of the risk-factor concept in older adults is required.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program recruited 4736 persons (mean age, 72 years); 14% were black, and 43% were men. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 170 and 77 mm Hg, respectively. About 13% of participants were current smokers; 10% had a history of diabetes; 5%, a prior myocardial infarction; 5% angina pectoris; 2.3%, intermittent claudication; and 7%, a carotid bruit. Mean total cholesterol value was 6.11 mmol/L. Mean follow-up was 4.5 years. In multivariate Cox regression analyses for CHD, variables that were significant were baseline total cholesterol value, smoking, history of diabetes, presence of carotid bruit, and treatment group in the trial. Active treatment yielded a 27% reduction in CHD risk. For each 1.03 mmol/L increase in total cholesterol value, there was an increase in risk of about 20%. Current smokers had a 73% increase, diabetics a 121% increase, and those with carotid bruit a 113% increase in CHD risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the concept that CHD risk factors are important in older men and women with isolated systolic hypertension.

Serum levels of vitamin E in relation to cardiovascular diseases

Serum vitamin E levels in healthy people (n = 71) and patients with cardiovascular diseases (n = 62) were determined. The cases of cardiovascular disease comprised patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n = 31), atherosclerosis (AT) (n = 23) and myocardial ischaemia (MI) (n = 8). The mean (+/- SD) serum vitamin E levels of the control group and the group with cardiovascular disease were 1.12 +/- 0.27 mg% and 0.98 +/- 0.41 mg%, respectively. Patients with AMI, AT and MI had corresponding levels of 0.97 +/- 0.48 mg%, 1.00 +/- 0.39 mg% and 1.01 +/- 0.44 mg%, respectively. Overall serum vitamin E levels were lower in the group with cardiovascular disease than in the control group. Patients and the control group are also discussed with respect to a number of potentially confounding parameters such as age, sex, smoking status, quetelet index (kg/m2), alcohol consumption, dietary intake and serum lipids.

Protocol for a prospective collaborative overview of all current and planned randomized trials of cholesterol treatment regimens. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration

The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration aims to provide reliable information about the effects on mortality and morbidity of treatments that modify blood lipid levels for a wide range of patient populations and risk groups. This protocol prospectively defines study eligibility, the main questions to be addressed, and statistical methods to be used. Additionally, by establishing a register of ongoing and planned trials prior to any trial results being known, this systematic overview attempts to avoid the methodologic problems and potential data-dependency of a retrospective project. The collaboration expects to have individual patient data on > 60,000 subjects by the year 2000, including 12,000 women and 20,000 elderly subjects, and should have good power to examine any effects on non-coronary artery disease events. Overall, there should be about 1,900 non-coronary artery disease deaths and > 2,000 total cancer events.

Serum lipids and coronary heart disease in British elderly

To assess the relationship between serum lipids and coronary heart disease (CHD) in an elderly population (mean age = 77.4; SEM +/- 0.4; range 70-92 years), serum total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were measured in 84 (males = 52) subjects with evidence of definite myocardial infarction and 125 (males = 77) age- and sex-matched controls free of CHD on Rose questionnaire and resting electrocardiogram. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, CHD showed inverse association with HDL-C (odds ratio for decrease by 1 s.d. = 1.6, P = 0.02) in males and positive association with TC (odds ratio for increase by 1 s.d. = 1.8, P = 0.03) and LDL-C (odds ratio for increase by 1 s.d. = 1.8, P = 0.04) in females. Of the other variables only diabetes in males (odds ratio 2.4, P = 0.05) and left ventricular hypertrophy in females (odds ratio 8.8, P = 0.03) were associated with CHD. The results suggest that further prospective studies to further evaluate the relation of serum lipids with CHD in this age group are indicated.

Pravastatin experience in elderly and non-elderly patients

Epidemiologic evidence linking elevated cholesterol concentrations and coronary heart disease (CHD) through the eighth decade of life provides a rationale for lowering cholesterol concentrations to reduce morbidity and mortality from CHD. Pravastatin, a well tolerated HMG CoA reductase inhibitor with a convenient once-daily dosing regimen, has been shown to effectively lower total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Individual data from more than 1800 hypercholesterolemic patients enrolled in six double-blind, randomized, multicenter studies were pooled and then analyzed to compare the safety and efficacy of pravastatin in the elderly (i.e., patients at least 65 years old) and the non-elderly. In short-term studies (8-16 weeks), response was dose-related and similar in elderly and non-elderly subjects. Pravastatin 20 or 40 mg daily lowered total cholesterol 19-25%, LDL-cholesterol 25-33%, and triglycerides 14-23%; high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased 5-10%. During long-term studies, improvements were sustained for more than 24 months in both the non-elderly and elderly. The incidences of adverse drug events and laboratory abnormalities were similar in the elderly and non-elderly patients in all groups (active treatment control with resin, pravastatin alone, or combination therapy). In short-term studies, treatment was discontinued because of adverse events in < 1% of all patients treated with pravastatin (all doses) or placebo. The frequency and profile of adverse events were similar among patients treated with pravastatin or placebo. In long-term studies, treatment was discontinued in 0.4% of patients in the pravastatin group and in 0.3% of the patients in the bile-acid-binding resin group. If drug therapy is warranted, pravastatin appears to be safe and effective for long-term use in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Challenge of aging

Images