Infection with hepatitis B virus after open heart surgery

The impact of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme, 2003-13: a multimethod evaluation

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme supports research tailored to the needs of NHS decision-makers, patients and clinicians. This study reviewed the impact of the programme, from 2003 to 2013, on health, clinical practice, health policy, the economy and academia. It also considered how HTA could maintain and increase its impact.

METHODS

Interviews (n = 20): senior stakeholders from academia, policy-making organisations and the HTA programme. Bibliometric analysis: citation analysis of publications arising from HTA programme-funded research. Researchfish survey: electronic survey of all HTA grant holders. Payback case studies (n = 12): in-depth case studies of HTA programme-funded research.

RESULTS

We make the following observations about the impact, and routes to impact, of the HTA programme: it has had an impact on patients, primarily through changes in guidelines, but also directly (e.g. changing clinical practice); it has had an impact on UK health policy, through providing high-quality scientific evidence - its close relationships with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC) contributed to the observed impact on health policy, although in some instances other organisations may better facilitate impact; HTA research is used outside the UK by other HTA organisations and systematic reviewers - the programme has an impact on HTA practice internationally as a leader in HTA research methods and the funding of HTA research; the work of the programme is of high academic quality - the Health Technology Assessment journal ensures that the vast majority of HTA programme-funded research is published in full, while the HTA programme still encourages publication in other peer-reviewed journals; academics agree that the programme has played an important role in building and retaining HTA research capacity in the UK; the HTA programme has played a role in increasing the focus on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in medicine - it has also contributed to increasingly positive attitudes towards HTA research both within the research community and the NHS; and the HTA focuses resources on research that is of value to patients and the UK NHS, which would not otherwise be funded (e.g. where there is no commercial incentive to undertake research). The programme should consider the following to maintain and increase its impact: providing targeted support for dissemination, focusing resources when important results are unlikely to be implemented by other stakeholders, particularly when findings challenge vested interests; maintaining close relationships with NICE and the NSC, but also considering other potential users of HTA research; maintaining flexibility and good relationships with researchers, giving particular consideration to the Technology Assessment Report (TAR) programme and the potential for learning between TAR centres; maintaining the academic quality of the work and the focus on NHS need; considering funding research on the short-term costs of the implementation of new health technologies; improving the monitoring and evaluation of whether or not patient and public involvement influences research; improve the transparency of the priority-setting process; and continuing to monitor the impact and value of the programme to inform its future scientific and administrative development.

Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: a 2015 update

Worldwide, some 240 million people have chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV), with the highest rates of infection in Africa and Asia. Our understanding of the natural history of HBV infection and the potential for therapy of the resultant disease is continuously improving. New data have become available since the previous APASL guidelines for management of HBV infection were published in 2012. The objective of this manuscript is to update the recommendations for the optimal management of chronic HBV infection. The 2015 guidelines were developed by a panel of Asian experts chosen by the APASL. The clinical practice guidelines are based on evidence from existing publications or, if evidence was unavailable, on the experts' personal experience and opinion after deliberations. Manuscripts and abstracts of important meetings published through January 2015 have been evaluated. This guideline covers the full spectrum of care of patients infected with hepatitis B, including new terminology, natural history, screening, vaccination, counseling, diagnosis, assessment of the stage of liver disease, the indications, timing, choice and duration of single or combination of antiviral drugs, screening for HCC, management in special situations like childhood, pregnancy, coinfections, renal impairment and pre- and post-liver transplant, and policy guidelines. However, areas of uncertainty still exist, and clinicians, patients, and public health authorities must therefore continue to make choices on the basis of the evolving evidence. The final clinical practice guidelines and recommendations are presented here, along with the relevant background information.

Hepatitis B in healthcare workers: Transmission events and guidance for management

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most efficiently transmissible of the bloodborne viruses that are important in healthcare settings. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk for exposure to HBV from infected patients and, if infected, are similarly at risk of transmitting HBV to patients. Published cases of HBV transmission from HCW to patient are relatively rare, having decreased in frequency following the introduction of standard (universal) precautions, adoption of enhanced percutaneous injury precautions such as double-gloving in surgery, and routine HBV vaccination of HCWs. Here we review published cases of HCW-to-patient transmission of HBV, details of which have helped to guide the creation of formal guidelines for the management of HBV-infected HCWs. We also compare the published guidelines for the management of HBV-infected HCWs from various governing bodies, focusing on their differences with regard to vaccination requirements, viral load limits, frequency of monitoring, and restrictions on practice. Importantly, while there are differences among the recommendations from governing bodies, no guidelines uniformly restrict HBV-infected HCWs from performing invasive or exposure-prone procedures.

A case of acute hepatitis B related to previous gynecological surgery in Japan

A 41-year-old woman became ill with acute hepatitis B after gynecological surgery performed by a surgeon who was hepatitis B surface antigen positive. The surgeon was positive for hepatitis B e antigen, and HBV DNA concentrations in the serum, saliva, and sweat of the surgeon were very high. HBV genotype and partial HBV DNA sequences from the HBV-infected surgeon were identical to those in the HBV-infected patient. Extensive research by the committee including infection control and prevention specialists judged the source of infection to be a surgeon infected with HBV. Transmission of HBV from a healthcare worker to patients who are not immune to HBV can actually happen. This case report illustrates the importance of a stringent policy of a nationwide HBV universal vaccination program.

Hepatitis B and the infected health care worker: public safety at what cost?

Public safety and the right of the health care worker to practise without prejudice based on underlying illness may be at odds for those affected by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Nevertheless, HBV does not preclude entry into a health care profession, and the risk of transmission from health care worker to patient is not uniform across the spectrum of health care fields. In the present article, the authors present an overview of the literature regarding transmission of HBV from the health care worker to the patient, and the current recommendations that vary from province to province within Canada. The establishment of national guidelines to standardize monitoring of HBV infection among health care workers would improve health care workplace safety and patient care.

Doctor-to-patient transmission of Hepatitis B virus: the potential of antiviral therapy for prevention

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health-care workers (HCWs) have infected patients during medical procedures. In many countries HBV-infected HCWs are restricted in performing exposure prone procedures based on either HBeAg status or serum HBV DNA level. To prevent loss of skilled HCWs and to minimize transmission risk, highly viraemic HCWs can be offered antiviral therapy. Nucleoside analogues have proven to be effective in reducing transmission of HIV and HBV in the setting of vertical mother-to-infant transmission. Following the same rationale, suppression of viral load in HBV-infected HCWs could minimize the risk of doctor-to-patient transmission to such an extent that job modifications are no longer indicated. To limit the risk of drug resistance, the use of combination therapy is advocated. We describe two chronic HBV-infected HCWs treated with antiviral therapy, eventually leading to well-tolerated and highly effective combination therapy with lamivudine and tenofovir, with continuation of medical practice.

Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis B virus associated with endomyocardial biopsy

OBJECTIVES

A high prevalence of chronic hepatitis B has been previously reported in heart transplant recipients in our center. Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis B has been therefore suggested. The aim of the present study was to investigate an outbreak of hepatitis B infection in heart transplant recipients and to to look for nosocomial acquisition of hepatitis B in these patients.

METHODS

In a retrospective case-control study, review of transvenous endomyocardial biopsy (TEB) procedure, line probe assay and DNA sequencing for characterization of the outbreak isolate genotypes were performed in order to assess the possible risk of nosocomial transmission of hepatitis B in the setting of heart transplantation. Case was defined as a patient negative for HBsAg before heart transplantation and positive after. Controls were matched with cases by date of transplantation and time-interval of HBV infection occurrence in the cases patients.

RESULTS

Transmission of HBV was associated with the number of HBsAg positive patients undergoing TEB the same day and in the same ward (OR=1.17, per additional encounter; 95%CI=1.01-1.37, P=0.02) and with the total number of TEB undergone after a HBsAg positive patient (OR=1.43 for additional encounter, 95%CI=0.97-2.1, P=0.056) but not with the number of biopsies. The virological study identified eight different strains. No common devices nor gloves, drapes, or medical solution were shared among patients during TEB. One staff member, but no surgeon, was HBsAg positive. No further case occurred after implementation of control measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-to-patient transmission during TEB sessions was demonstrated by the virological and the case-control studies. This transmission occurred without evidence of blood contact through vials or devices. There is strong evidence that this transmission may be due to the spread of infective blood droplets on the environmental surfaces and the material during the TEB procedure.

Infected Physicians and Invasive Procedures: Safe Practice Management

There is currently no public policy that provides guidance concerning whether and when physicians infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and/or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can safely perform invasive procedures. A committee of experts in the fields of medicine, law, and biomedical ethics and 1 community member, aided by an advisory board, was established to produce recommendations for policy reform. An extensive literature review was conducted for these 3 infectious diseases, medicine, surgery, epidemiology, law, and bioethics to gather all relevant data. Special recommendations are made regarding the management of physicians who are infected with HIV, HBV, and/or HCV. This policy proposal includes a list of exposure-prone procedures and a decision chart that indicates under what conditions infected physicians can practice beyond the need for disclosure of their serological status.

Risk of HIV and other blood-borne infections in the cardiac setting: patient-to-provider and provider-to-patient transmission

Health care workers (HCWs) face a well-recognized risk of acquiring blood-borne pathogens in their workplace, in particular hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV/HBC) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Additionally, infected HCWs performing invasive exposure-prone procedures, including in the cardiac setting, represent a potential risk for patients. An increasing number of infected persons could need specific cardiac diagnostic procedures and surgical treatment in the future, regardless of their sex or age. The risk of acquiring HIV, HCV, HBV infection after a single at-risk exposure averages 0.5%, and 1-2%, and 4-30%, respectively. The frequency of percutaneous exposure ranges from 1 to 15 per 100 surgical interventions, with cardiothoracic surgery reporting the highest rates of exposures; mucocutaneous contamination by blood-splash occurs in 50% of cardiothoracic operations. In the Italian Surveillance (SIROH), a total of 987 percutaneous and 255 mucocutaneous exposures were reported in the cardiac setting; most occurred in cardiology units (46%), and in cardiovascular surgery (44%). Overall, 257 source patients were anti-HCV+, 54 HBsAg+, and 14 HIV+. No seroconversions were observed. In the literature, 14 outbreaks were reported documenting transmission of HBV from 12 infected HCWs to 107 patients, and 2 cases of HCV to 6 patients, during cardiothoracic surgery, especially related to sternotomy and its suturing. The transmission rate was estimated to be 5% to 13% for HBV, and 0.36% to 2.25% for HCV. Strategies in risk reduction include adequate surveillance, education, effective sharps disposal, personal protective equipment, safety devices, and innovative technology-based intraoperative procedures.

Nosocomial spread of viral disease

Viruses are important causes of nosocomial infection, but the fact that hospital outbreaks often result from introduction(s) from community-based epidemics, together with the need to initiate specific laboratory testing, means that there are usually insufficient data to allow the monitoring of trends in incidences. The most important defenses against nosocomial transmission of viruses are detailed and continuing education of staff and strict adherence to infection control policies. Protocols must be available to assist in the management of patients with suspected or confirmed viral infection in the health care setting. In this review, we present details on general measures to prevent the spread of viral infection in hospitals and other health care environments. These include principles of accommodation of infected patients and approaches to good hygiene and patient management. They provide detail on individual viral diseases accompanied in each case with specific information on control of the infection and, where appropriate, details of preventive and therapeutic measures. The important areas of nosocomial infection due to blood-borne viruses have been extensively reviewed previously and are summarized here briefly, with citation of selected review articles. Human prion diseases, which present management problems very different from those of viral infection, are not included.

Risk and management of blood-borne infections in health care workers

Exposure to blood-borne pathogens poses a serious risk to health care workers (HCWs). We review the risk and management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in HCWs and also discuss current methods for preventing exposures and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. In the health care setting, blood-borne pathogen transmission occurs predominantly by percutaneous or mucosal exposure of workers to the blood or body fluids of infected patients. Prospective studies of HCWs have estimated that the average risk for HIV transmission after a percutaneous exposure is approximately 0.3%, the risk of HBV transmission is 6 to 30%, and the risk of HCV transmission is approximately 1.8%. To minimize the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission from HCWs to patients, all HCWs should adhere to standard precautions, including the appropriate use of hand washing, protective barriers, and care in the use and disposal of needles and other sharp instruments. Employers should have in place a system that includes written protocols for prompt reporting, evaluation, counseling, treatment, and follow-up of occupational exposures that may place a worker at risk of blood-borne pathogen infection. A sustained commitment to the occupational health of all HCWs will ensure maximum protection for HCWs and patients and the availability of optimal medical care for all who need it.

Risk and management of blood-borne infections in health care workers

Exposure to blood-borne pathogens poses a serious risk to health care workers (HCWs). We review the risk and management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in HCWs and also discuss current methods for preventing exposures and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. In the health care setting, blood-borne pathogen transmission occurs predominantly by percutaneous or mucosal exposure of workers to the blood or body fluids of infected patients. Prospective studies of HCWs have estimated that the average risk for HIV transmission after a percutaneous exposure is approximately 0.3%, the risk of HBV transmission is 6 to 30%, and the risk of HCV transmission is approximately 1.8%. To minimize the risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission from HCWs to patients, all HCWs should adhere to standard precautions, including the appropriate use of hand washing, protective barriers, and care in the use and disposal of needles and other sharp instruments. Employers should have in place a system that includes written protocols for prompt reporting, evaluation, counseling, treatment, and follow-up of occupational exposures that may place a worker at risk of blood-borne pathogen infection. A sustained commitment to the occupational health of all HCWs will ensure maximum protection for HCWs and patients and the availability of optimal medical care for all who need it.

The risks and challenges of surgical glove failure

The relationship between infection control standards and surgical gloving practices is an important issue in combating infectious disease. For their own and their patients' protection, health care personnel must rely on the barrier qualities of gloves more than ever before. Both surgical and examination gloves fail frequently, which puts health care providers and patients at risk of acquiring fluid-borne pathogens. This paper discusses current guidelines, the risk of infection by viral and bacterial pathogens, controversial issues involving gloving practices, and recommendations to improve infection control practices.

Transmission of hepatitis B to patients from four infected surgeons without hepatitis B e antigen

BACKGROUND

Transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) to patients by infected surgeons who carry hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) has been documented repeatedly. In the United Kingdom HBeAg-positive surgeons are not permitted to perform certain procedures that carry a risk that patients might be exposed to the blood of a health care worker. There are no practice restrictions for carriers of hepatitis B surface antigen without detectable HBeAg, unless transmission has been demonstrated.

METHODS

In four unconnected cases of acute hepatitis B, surgery was identified as a possible source, so we tested the surgical teams for serologic markers of HBV infection. In each case a surgeon was found to be infected with the virus. HBV DNA was amplified by a nested polymerase chain reaction from serum from the four infected surgeons and the four patients, and direct nucleotide sequencing of two regions of the HBV genome was performed. Alternative sources of infection were ruled out. Other patients on whom three of the surgeons had recently performed procedures were offered testing.

RESULTS

All four surgeons were carriers of HBV, but none had detectable serum HBeAg. The nucleotide sequences of HBV DNA from the surgeons were indistinguishable from those from the corresponding patients. The screening of other exposed patients identified at least two other patients who had probably acquired hepatitis B infection from one of these surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons who are carriers of HBV without detectable serum HBeAg can transmit HBV to patients during procedures.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus by a cardiac surgeon

BACKGROUND

In the course of a study conducted in 1992 through 1994 of the efficacy of screening blood donors for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV), we found that two patients had acquired hepatitis C after cardiac surgery, with the transmission apparently unrelated to blood transfusions. Because their surgeon had chronic hepatitis C, we sought to determine whether he was transmitting the virus to his patients.

METHODS

Of 222 of the surgeon's patients who participated in studies of post-transfusion hepatitis between 1988 and 1994, 6 contracted postoperative hepatitis C, despite the use of only seronegative blood for transfusions. All six patients had undergone valve-replacement surgery. Analyses were performed to compare nucleotide sequences encompassing the hypervariable region at the junction between the coding regions for envelope glycoproteins E1 and E2 in the surgeon, the patients, and 10 controls infected with the same HCV genotype.

RESULTS

The surgeon and five of the six patients with hepatitis C unrelated to transfusion were infected with HCV genotype 3; the sixth patient had genotype 1 and was considered to have been infected from another source. Thirteen other patients of the surgeon had transfusion-associated hepatitis C and were also infected with genotype 1. The average net genetic distance between the sequences from the five patients with HCV genotype 3 and those from the surgeon was 2.1 percent (range, 1.1 to 2.5 percent; P < 0.001), as compared with an average distance of 7.6 percent (range, 6.1 to 8.3 percent) between the sequences from the patients and those from the controls. The results of phylogenetic-tree analysis indicated a common epidemiologic origin of the viruses from the surgeon and the five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide evidence that a cardiac surgeon with chronic hepatitis C may have transmitted HCV to five of his patients during open-heart surgery.

Transmission of hepatitis B virus to multiple patients from a surgeon without evidence of inadequate infection control

BACKGROUND

Although about 1 percent of surgeons are infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), transmission from surgeons to patients is thought to be uncommon. In July 1992, a 47-year-old woman became ill with acute hepatitis B after undergoing a thymectomy in which a thoracic-surgery resident who had had acute hepatitis B six months earlier assisted.

METHODS

To determine whether the surgeon transmitted HBV to this patient and others, we conducted chart reviews, interviews, and serologic testing of thoracic-surgery patients at the two hospitals where the surgeon worked from July 1991 to July 1992. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtypes and DNA sequences from the surgeon and from infected patients were determined.

RESULTS

Of 144 susceptible patients in whose surgery the infected surgeon participated, 19 had evidence of recent HBV infection (13 percent). One of the hospitals was selected for additional study, and none of the 124 susceptible patients of the other thoracic surgeons at this hospital had evidence of recent HBV infection (relative risk, infinity; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.7 to infinity). No evidence was found for any common source of HBV other than the infected surgeon. The HBsAg subtype and the partial HBV DNA sequences from the surgeon were identical to those in the infected patients. Transmission of the infection was associated with cardiac transplantation (relative risk, 4.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 15.5) but not with other surgical procedures. The surgeon was positive for hepatitis B e antigen and had a high serum HBV DNA concentration (15 ng per milliliter). Our investigations identified no deficiencies in the surgeon's infection-control practices.

CONCLUSIONS

In this outbreak there was surgeon-to-patient HBV transmission despite apparent compliance with recommended infection-control practices. We could not identify any specific events that led to transmission.

Viral hazards to and from health care workers

Much attention has been directed towards nosocomial transmission of viruses as a result of clear evidence of patient-to-staff and staff-to-patient transmission of the blood-borne viruses HIV and hepatitis B virus. Although the relatively long incubation periods of these viruses, together with the frequency of asymptomatic infections, renders problems for surveillance it has been possible to study modes of transmission and levels of risk over a number of years. Information on trends of incidence of other nosocomial virus infections has been difficult to obtain for a number of reasons. Often, an outbreak in the health care setting parallels an epidemic in the community. Although it may be possible to define nosocomial transmission from recording dates of onset of illness relative to admission date and, at times, demonstrate circulation of a common strain by molecular techniques, the relative contributions of patient-to-staff and staff-to-patient transmission may be difficult to clarify. In this review, details are presented of the major viruses associated with nosocomial transmission with examples of infections to and from staff where these have occurred. The major defences against patient-to-staff and staff-to-patient transmission are awareness of potential risks, education and adherence to infection control policies, immunization of staff, effective decontamination and sterilization and the adoption of 'Universal Precautions' in patient care. In addition, there may be occasions when additional measures should be considered including isolation, cohorting and the use of specific chemo- and immunoprophylaxis.

Protecting patients when their surgeon or dentist is infected with a blood-borne virus

The vast majority of surgeons and dentists infected with either hepatitis B or HIV do not transmit these infections to patients. When such transmission from health care provider to patients does occur, the precise mechanism of transmission usually remains enigmatic. Attempts to forestall these rare events have produced substantial debate as well as legislative and regulatory initiatives. The routine immunization of medical and dental students with hepatitis B vaccine will eventually eliminate surgeons and dentists as sources of this infection. Serological screening of surgeons and dentists for HIV infection has been considered impractical. Thus, emphasis has been placed on enhancing measures that reduce the risk of blood contact between health care provider and patient. These include developing safer techniques and procedures. When an infected surgeon or dentist is discovered, a review of their professional circumstances is undertaken. In the US many hepatitis B-infected persons are permitted to continue practice; most HIV-infected persons stop performing invasive procedures. Not completely reassured, some patients inquire of their dentist's or surgeon's HIV antibody status.

Patients treated by a thoracic surgeon with HIV. A review

Transmission of HIV from healthcare worker to patient has been documented in one report. Though the means of transmission in that case remains unknown, procedures that involve exposure to blood or mucous membranes are thought to carry an increased risk. Because of previous evidence of transmission of hepatitis B by cardiothoracic surgeons, they have been identified as a group known to perform exposure-prone invasive procedures with a risk of viral transmission. A retrospective review of 612 patients of a cardiothoracic surgeon who is HIV-positive was conducted in an attempt to identify any instance of viral transmission. A total of 189 patients received HIV testing and counseling. No positive test results were obtained.

Obstacles to hepatitis B vaccine uptake by health care staff

OBJECTIVES

(1) To identify reasons for non-uptake of hepatitis B vaccine by health care staff; (2) to determine whether fully vaccinated staff are aware of the need to consider booster vaccinations in the future.

DESIGN

Semi-structured anonymous questionnaire survey of health care staff.

SETTING

Croydon health district, south London.

SUBJECTS

462 health care staff.

RESULTS

300 staff (65%) responded. The reasons given by staff for non-uptake included fear of side-effects or injections, misconceptions about hepatitis B transmission, the alternative use of homeopathic vaccine, pressure of work, difficulties in arranging vaccination, forgetfulness, and 'inertia'. Of the 54 unvaccinated staff, 55.6% believed themselves to be at high risk of contracting hepatitis B as a result of their occupation; 33% of 202 fully vaccinated staff were unaware of the use of booster doses of vaccine to maintain long-term immunity.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of awareness and understanding about hepatitis B vaccination of any group of health care staff should not be assumed. A number of specific educational and organisational issues need to be addressed when implementing staff vaccination programmes. Without the use of automatic call-recall systems the long-term success of staff hepatitis B vaccination programmes may be in doubt.

Risks to surgeons and patients from HIV and hepatitis: guidelines on precautions and management of exposure to blood or body fluids. Joint Working Party of the Hospital Infection Society and the Surgical Infection Study Group

Images