Public should be told that vaccines may have long term adverse effects

Infertility: A common target of antivaccine misinformation campaigns

Misinformation, disinformation, and conspiracy theories about vaccines are key drivers of vaccine hesitancy. A repeated false claim about COVID-19 vaccines is that the vaccines cause female infertility. Dating back decades, various conspiracy theories have linked vaccination programs with infertility and thus harmed vaccination programs in Africa, Asia, and Central America, particularly against polio and tetanus. In the United States, Europe, and Australia, human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines have been falsely blamed for infertility and primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). After distribution of COVID-19 vaccines began in December 2020, almost immediately there arose conspiracy theories claiming that these vaccines cause menstrual irregularities, miscarriages, and infertility, promoted by noted antivaccine activists Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Andrew Wakefield among others. Here we will explore the history of this antivaccine narrative, how it has been promulgated in the past and repurposed to COVID-19 vaccines, and strategies to counter it.

Vaccination and autoimmunity-'vaccinosis': a dangerous liaison?

The question of a connection between vaccination and autoimmune illness (or phenomena) is surrounded by controversy. A heated debate is going on regarding the causality between vaccines, such as measles and anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Brain antibodies as well as clinical symptoms have been found in patients vaccinated against those diseases. Other autoimmune illnesses have been associated with vaccinations. Tetanus toxoid, influenza vaccines, polio vaccine, and others, have been related to phenomena ranging from autoantibodies production to full-blown illness (such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA)). Conflicting data exists regarding also the connection between autism and vaccination with measles vaccine. So far only one controlled study of an experimental animal model has been published, in which the possible causal relation between vaccines and autoimmune findings has been examined: in healthy puppies immunized with a variety of commonly given vaccines, a variety of autoantibodies have been documented but no frank autoimmune illness was recorded. The findings could also represent a polyclonal activation (adjuvant reaction). The mechanism (or mechanisms) of autoimmune reactions following immunization has not yet been elucidated. One of the possibilities is molecular mimicry; when a structural similarity exists between some viral antigen (or other component of the vaccine) and a self-antigen. This similarity may be the trigger to the autoimmune reaction. Other possible mechanisms are discussed. Even though the data regarding the relation between vaccination and autoimmune disease is conflicting, it seems that some autoimmune phenomena are clearly related to immunization (e.g. Guillain-Barre syndrome). The issue of the risk of vaccination remains a philosophical one, since to date the advantages of this policy have not been refuted, while the risk for autoimmune disease has not been irrevocably proved. We discuss the pros and cons of this issue (although the temporal relationship (i.e. always 2-3 months following immunization) is impressive).

Immunisation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the current state of play

Concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of immunisation in patients with SLE have persisted for over 50 y and indeed infection remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. There have been many anecdotal reports in the literature linking vaccination with either induction or exacerbation of SLE disease. However prospective studies have shown that immunisation with inactivated/killed vaccines is probably safe in patients with SLE. Individuals on immunosuppressive agents and/or high dose steroid (more than 20 mg/d) should not receive live vaccines, as stated in guidelines proposed by the British Society of Rheumatology. The safety of hepatitis B vaccination in patients with SLE is as yet undetermined and a prospective study is required. However until such evidence becomes available the advice of the BSR should be followed and patients with SLE who are at risk of exposure should be vaccinated. It remains uncertain whether the immune response to immunisation is significantly impaired by active disease and/or immunosuppressive treatment and to what extent. Most patients do however seem to mount a satisfactory immune response though this may not be quantitatively and qualitatively the same as healthy controls.

Association between type 1 diabetes and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccination: birth cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccination and its timing on the risk of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children.

DESIGN

Cumulative incidence and relative risk of type 1 diabetes was compared among three birth cohorts of Finnish children: those born during the 24 months before the H influenzae type b vaccination trial, those in the trial cohort who were vaccinated at 3 months of age and later with a booster vaccine, and those in the trial cohort who were vaccinated at 24 months of age only. The probability of type 1 diabetes was estimated using regression analysis assuming that there were no losses to 10 year follow up and no competing risks.

SETTING

Finland (total population 5 million and annual birth rate 1.3%).

SUBJECTS

128 936 children born from 1 October 1983 to 1 September 1985, and 116 352 children born from 1 October 1985 to 31 August 1987.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Probability of type 1 diabetes among children vaccinated with H influenzae type b and non-vaccinated children.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found at any time during the 10 year follow up in the risk of type 1 diabetes between the children born before the vaccination period and those vaccinated at the age of 24 months only (relative risk 1.01). The difference in the risk between the cohort vaccinated first at the age of 3 months and the cohort vaccinated at the age of 24 months only was not statistically significant either (1.06).

CONCLUSION

It is unlikely that H influenzae type b vaccination or its timing cause type 1 diabetes in children.