Improving women's experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: randomised clinical trial

Experience of Pelvic Examination and Uptake of Gynecological Care Following Domestic or Sexual Violence: a Systematic Review

Pelvic examination, a routine practice for gynecological care, can cause anxiety and be considered traumatic. This study aimed to define the association between domestic or sexual violence and the experience of pelvic examination, as well as the uptake of gynecological care following domestic or sexual violence. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched, up to April 30, 2023. Cohort, cross-sectional, case-control studies and controlled trials assessing perception of pelvic examination or the use of gynecological care for women with a history of violence were selected and analyzed. Each study underwent a descriptive analysis and was assessed for bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the RoB2 tool. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies, including 7,329 women, investigated the experience of pelvic examination following lifetime or childhood sexual violence. Most reported an association between violence and adverse experiences of pelvic examination, such as discomfort, anxiety, distress, and pain perceptions. Ten studies, including 9,248 women, investigated the uptake of gynecological care following domestic or sexual violence and reported mixed results, such as a decreased or an increased uptake, particularly for acute symptoms. Two studies, including 1,304 women, examined both outcomes. The present study highlights the association between violence and adverse experiences of pelvic examination, as well as mixed results on the uptake of gynecological care. It argues for the necessity to screen for violence in consultations, particularly when considering a pelvic examination, to guarantee the utility of pelvic examinations, and to consider the traumatic impact of sexual violence in care.

The Effect of Anesthesia Type on the Stability of the Surgical View on the Monitor in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stone: A Prospective Observational Trial

Background and Objectives: Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive technique for nephrolithiasis. RIRS is performed via a monitor screen displaying a magnified surgical site. Respiration can affect the stability of the surgical view during RIRS because the kidneys are close to the diaphragm. The purpose of this trial is to compare the effect of anesthesia type on the stability of the surgical view during RIRS between spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Patients were allocated to the general anesthesia group or spinal anesthesia group. During surgery, movement of the surgical field displayed on the monitor screen was graded by the first assistant on a 10-grade numeric rating scale (0-10). Next, it was also graded by the main surgeon. After surgery, we evaluated the discomfort with the anesthesia method for all patients. Results: Thirty-four patients were allocated to the general anesthesia group and 32 patients to the spinal anesthesia group. The average values of the two surgeons for surgical field oscillation grade showed vision on the monitor screen was more stable in the general anesthesia group than the spinal anesthesia group (3.3 ± 1.6 vs. 5.0 ± 1.6, p < 0.001). The degrees of the inconvenience of the surgery did not differ between the groups (0.7 ± 1.8 vs. 1.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.114), even though more patients reported inconvenience with a grade of 3 or more in the spinal anesthesia group (8.8% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.042). Conclusions: In terms of the visualization of the surgical site, general anesthesia might provide a more stable surgical view during RIRS compared to spinal anesthesia without increasing inconvenience induced by the type of anesthesia.

Understanding the Diagnostic Odyssey of Women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) Syndrome in Denmark: A Qualitative Interview Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is often a lengthy process that typically occurs during late adolescence. To support optimized and patient-centered care, this study aimed to investigate how women with MRKH syndrome experience the diagnostic process.

METHODS

From January 2021 to March 2021, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 Danish women (≥25 years) diagnosed with MRKH syndrome. The interviews lasted a median of 92 minutes (range: 67-117). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

As teenagers or young women at the time, all women had experienced the diagnostic process in the nonspecialized healthcare sector as deeply upsetting due to distressing gynecological examinations, use of inappropriate language, and considerable diagnostic delay. When reaching the specialized health care sector, questions could finally be answered, but this information and support did not significantly alter their feelings of being "deviant" or "flawed". The women continued their diagnostic odyssey beyond the health care system and found online communities that gave them valuable support in living with MRKH syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Women experience the diagnostic odyssey of MRKH syndrome as upsetting and potentially traumatizing beyond the diagnosis. Healthcare professionals can influence young women's understanding and experience of MRKH syndrome by using inclusive language (eg, avoiding "deformity") and addressing all that is normal and functioning (eg, external genitalia and potential for sexual pleasure). In nonurgent conditions, young women should be given the choice to delay a genital examination.

Patient preferences for disposable and reusable vaginal specula and their willingness to compromise in the era of climate change: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patient satisfaction on gynaecological examination with metal, plastic and biobased plastic vaginal specula, and to investigate whether patients are willing to compromise on comfort for a more sustainable healthcare system.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study: population-based survey.

SETTING

Gynaecological outpatient clinics in five Dutch hospitals.

POPULATION

Patients during general gynaecology consultation hours.

METHODS

A survey containing two questions about patient demographics, four about comfort and five about sustainability and healthcare was distributed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Comfort score (scale 1-10).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

(1) temperature, size and ease of insertion, (2) willingness to compromise for a more sustainable healthcare system.

RESULTS

In all, 196 patients completed the survey. Biobased plastic vaginal specula scored significantly higher on comfort than the metal ones (mean 8.03 ± 1.65 versus 7.26 ± 1.51 respectively; P < 0.001). The biobased plastic vaginal speculum is significantly the most comfortable on temperature, whereas the metal speculum is the least comfortable (P < 0.007). Most patients are willing to compromise on comfort or are open to the reuse of disposables to contribute to a more sustainable healthcare. The majority of patients (77%) urge healthcare organisations to combat climate change.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a small but statistically significant difference in favour of a biobased plastic speculum regarding comfort score, although it might be questioned whether this is clinically relevant. Furthermore, patients are willing to compromise on comfort for a more sustainable healthcare, which should be a contributing factor in speculum selection.

[Pelvic exam in gynecology and obstetrics: Guidelines for clinical practice]

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

METHODS

The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases.

'Poorly relaxed women': A situational analysis of pelvic examination learning materials for medical students

BACKGROUND

Certain clinical pelvic examination (PE) teaching methods have been critiqued for prioritising student learning over patient autonomy and for not accurately representing diverse patient communities. As such, patient-centred and culturally competent approaches to the PE may need further emphasis in the medical curriculum-in particular, in content delivered to students before patient interaction. Classroom materials serve as students' first exposure to the sensitive procedure. This research explores how patients are represented in these materials.

METHODS

A situational analysis was conducted on 10 purposively sampled PE learning materials for the 2019/20 academic year from five undergraduate medical schools in Canada. Situational analysis focuses on analysing discourse but is epistemically aligned with post-structuralism (most notably Foucault's theories involving discursive power) and allows for specific consideration of 'silences' in the data. Collected data were analysed using cartographic approaches according to this methodology, with particular attention paid to the tenets and frameworks of patient-centred and culturally competent care.

RESULTS

Overall, content in these materials misrepresented and under-represented patients. Materials contained both outdated and unnecessarily sexualised language, in addition to a lack of patient diversity. Clinical authority was often centred over patient agency, and several updated PE techniques known to improve patient experience were absent. Patient-centred and culturally competent approaches were therefore inadequately highlighted in most of the materials.

CONCLUSIONS

Depictions contained in these materials may be perpetuating stereotypes and biases in medicine and may be working to maintain teaching practices that cause harm to patients (standardised and regular) who students interact with in both clinical and educational settings. Efforts may be needed to improve classroom materials on the PE so that they more adequately centre patients and provide opportunities to discuss culturally competent approaches to the procedure that (i) may not be covered in other parts of the PE curriculum and (ii) can reduce known health disparities.

Silent voices that must be heard - women's perceptions of gynecologic examinations

PURPOSE

To analyze the perception of gynecologic examination from the patients' point of view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This anonymous electronic cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the subjective experiences of women during gynecologic examinations (levels of pain, embarrassment and trauma), the manner the examination was conducted, and women's suggestions for improving their experience.

RESULTS

Overall, 6,508 women answered the survey. The examination was considered an embarrassing event by 47%, painful by 35% and traumatic by 19%. Importantly, only 43% of the respondents stated they would notify the gynecologist in case of physical discomfort or pain during the examination. The quality of physician-to-patient communication was rated as the most important aspect of gynecologic examination, and showed a significant association with the general quality of the experience (levels of pain, embarrassment, and trauma). Matters relating to women's privacy during gynecologic examination were also considered important. An option for a companion was rated as important by 64% of the respondents. Significant differences with large effect-sizes were found between the respondents' preferences and their reports of the observed situation.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the need for establishing guidelines for gynecologic examinations, according to a patient-centered care approach. This study constitutes a first discourse on the subject of gynecologic examinations in Israel in order to provide an overview and initial insights, serving as a starting point for further specific and more in-depth research.

Utilization of a Mirror During Pelvic Examinations: Does it Improve the Patient's Experience?

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to assess the utility of a mirror in improving pain and vulnerability during a pelvic examination.

METHODS

In this prospective, institutional review board-approved, 2-cohort trial, all "new" patients presenting to a urogynecology office were offered to have a mirror or no-mirror present during their pelvic examination. Patients completed 100-mm visual analog scales regarding pain, anxiety, knowledge, control, embarrassment, and vulnerability before and after examination. The primary outcome was difference in level of pain and vulnerability between groups. Secondary outcomes included comparisons from baseline to postexamination scores within groups, patient satisfaction, and examination duration. A sample size of 68 participants in each arm was planned.

RESULTS

From April 2019 to May 2020, 147 participants were enrolled. Two participants were excluded, 145 were included in the final analysis; 74 in the no-mirror group and 71 in the mirror group. The average age was 55.9 (±13) years, and the groups were overall similar. There was no difference in primary outcomes of pain or vulnerability, but the mirror group showed improved levels of control (P = 0.006) and knowledge (P = 0.018) following examination. All participants reported high satisfaction, and those that selected a mirror reported strong preference for future use.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who chose to use the mirror did not demonstrate a difference in pain or vulnerability scores; however, they exhibited benefit to their sense of control and knowledge after the pelvic examination. Although the mirror did not benefit all patients, this is a simple option that could improve the examination experience for some.Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03785548.

Environnement réconfortant et respect de l’intimité. L’organisation du cabinet médical pour la consultation gynécologique

INTRODUCTION

Social science concepts (intimate distance, personal space) suggest that the gynecological examination environment (GEE) might influence women&#8217;s feelings during the exam.Purpose of research: We explore this hypothesis by assessing women&#8217;s preferences for the GEE.

RESULTS

An opinion poll was conducted, without randomization to explore women&#8217;s point of view. In 2017, questionnaires were referred to women by 14&#160;general practitioners in the Lille region. Among 173&#160;answers, 73% granted importance to the medical setting, especially to a comfortable ambiance and an isolated place during an exam (to respect women&#8217;s privacy). Women expected at least: a separation of consultation/examination (77%), disposal of sanitary towels (80%), a place to leave clothes and underwear (74%), a changing area (56%). Fifty-five percent judged it unnecessary to cover the lower body. Concerning the examination table: comfort was satisfactory (93%), &#8220;calm and peaceful colors&#8221; were appreciated, but clamps should be improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The GEE is characterized by a balance of natural comfort and a sequentially delimited spatial configuration. The study revealed cultural and subjective dimensions of privacy. Physicians need to apply psychosocial competences to perform a person-centered gynecological exam.

A novel speculum-free imaging strategy for visualization of the internal female lower reproductive system

Fear of the speculum and feelings of vulnerability during the gynecologic exams are two of the biggest barriers to cervical cancer screening for women. To address these barriers, we have developed a novel, low-cost tool called the Callascope to reimagine the gynecological exam, enabling clinician and self-imaging of the cervix without the need for a speculum. The Callascope contains a 2 megapixel camera and contrast agent spray mechanism housed within a form factor designed to eliminate the need for a speculum during contrast agent administration and image capture. Preliminary bench testing for comparison of the Callascope camera to a $20,000 high-end colposcope demonstrated that the Callascope camera meets visual requirements for cervical imaging. Bench testing of the spray mechanism demonstrates that the contrast agent delivery enables satisfactory administration and cervix coverage. Clinical studies performed at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA and in Greater Accra Regional Hospital, Accra, Ghana assessed (1) the Callascope's ability to visualize the cervix compared to the standard-of-care speculum exam, (2) the feasibility and willingness of women to use the Callascope for self-exams, and (3) the feasibility and willingness of clinicians and their patients to use the Callascope for clinician-based examinations. Cervix visualization was comparable between the Callascope and speculum (83% or 44/53 women vs. 100%) when performed by a clinician. Visualization was achieved in 95% (21/22) of women who used the Callascope for self-imaging. Post-exam surveys indicated that participants preferred the Callascope to a speculum-based exam. Our results indicate the Callascope is a viable option for clinician-based and self-exam speculum-free cervical imaging.Clinical study registration ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/ NCT00900575, Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR) https://www.pactr.org/ PACTR201905806116817.

Impact of using words with unpleasant emotional connotations on perceived patient discomfort during vaginal speculum examinations: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Many providers often use terms such as "this might hurt", or "you might feel pressure" during exams with the intention to be compassionate and to help decrease discomfort. No evidence exists to support this practice. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the use of words with unpleasant emotional connotation on perceived discomfort at the time of vaginal speculum examination.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized trial was performed on premenopausal women undergoing a routine well-woman speculum exam. 120 total patients were included and randomized into one of two groups; phrases with unpleasant connotation (n = 60) vs. objective phrases (n = 60). During the speculum exam, the provider used either phrases with unpleasant connotation (i.e., "You are going to feel a lot of pressure"), or objective phrases (i.e., "I am going to introduce the speculum"). Following the exam, patients were asked to rate the level of discomfort/pain experienced during the exam and to compare their actual experience to their anticipated experience. Descriptive statistics were performed. Chi-square and independent samples t-test were used with a significance of p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients in the phrases with unpleasant connotation group had significantly higher pain scores than the objective phrases group (2.9 ± 1.5 vs. 0.8 ± 0.8 (p < .01)). The majority of the patients in the phrases with unpleasant connotation group reported the exam "as painful as anticipated" or "more painful than anticipated" whereas the majority of the patients in the objective phrases group reported the exam as "pain free" or "less painful than anticipated".

CONCLUSION

Healthcare providers performing speculum examinations should use objective statements and avoid the use of phrases with unpleasant connotation with the intention to minimize perceived pain during exams.

Women's expectations and experiences of rupture of membranes and views of the potential use of reagent pads for detecting amniotic fluid

AIMS

To explore first-time mothers' expectations and experiences regarding rupture of membranes at term and their views on the potential use of reagent pads that detect amniotic fluid.

BACKGROUND

There is little information available on women's experiences of spontaneous rupture of membranes, or interest in using methods to confirm rupture of membranes (e.g. reagent pads).

DESIGN

Descriptive qualitative study, using focus groups and telephone interviews with women during pregnancy and after the birth of their first baby. Thematic analysis was undertaken to analyse women's responses.

METHODS

Ethics committee approval was obtained. Twenty-five women participated in the study of whom 13 contributed both during pregnancy and postpartum between October 2015-March 2016.

FINDINGS

Three overarching themes were identified from the data from women's expectations and experiences: uncertainty in how, when and where membranes may rupture; information which was felt to be limited and confirmation of rupture of membranes. The potential use of reagent pads met with varied responses.

CONCLUSION

Women were interested in having facts and figures regarding rupture of membranes, such as characteristics of liquor; volume and probability of membranes rupturing spontaneously at term. Use of a pad as a means of confirmation was viewed as helpful, although the potential for increasing anxiety was raised.

Design and preliminary analysis of a vaginal inserter for speculum-free cervical cancer screening

Objective

Cervical cancer screening usually requires use of a speculum to provide a clear view of the cervix. The speculum is one potential barrier to screening due to fear of pain, discomfort and embarrassment. The aim of this paper is to present and demonstrate the feasibility of a tampon-sized inserter and the POCkeT Colposcope, a miniature pen sized-colposcope, for comfortable, speculum-free and potentially self-colposcopy.

Study design

We explored different designs using 3D computer-aided design (CAD) software and performed mechanical testing simulations on each. Designs were rapid prototyped and tested using a custom vaginal phantom across a range of vaginal pressures and uterine tilts to select an optimal design. Two final designs were tested with fifteen volunteers to assess cervix visualization, comfort and usability compared to the speculum and the optimal design, the curved-tip inserter, was selected for testing in volunteers.

Results

We present a vaginal inserter as an alternative to the standard speculum for use with the POCkeT Colposcope. The device has a slim tubular body with a funnel-like curved tip measuring approximately 2.5 cm in diameter. The inserter has a channel through which a 2 megapixel (MP) mini camera with LED illumination fits to enable image capture. Mechanical finite element testing simulations with an applied pressure of 15 cm H₂O indicated a high factor of safety (90.9) for the inserter. Testing of the device with a custom vaginal phantom, across a range of supine vaginal pressures and uterine tilts (retroverted, anteverted and sideverted), demonstrated image capture with a visual area comparable to the speculum for a normal/axial positioned uteri and significantly better than the speculum for anteverted and sideverted uteri (p<0.00001). Volunteer studies with self-insertion and physician-assisted cervix image capture showed adequate cervix visualization for 83% of patients. In addition, questionnaire responses from volunteers indicated a 92.3% overall preference for the inserter over the speculum and all indicated that the inserter was more comfortable than the speculum. The inserter provides a platform for self-cervical cancer screening and also enables acetic acid/Lugol’s iodine application and insertion of swabs for Pap smear sample collection.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility of an inserter and miniature-imaging device for comfortable cervical image capture of women with potential for synergistic HPV and Pap smear sample collection.

Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland

Background

Cervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable if detected early through regular screening. Women in the Canadian province of Newfoundland & Labrador have relatively low rates of cervical cancer screening, with rates of around 40 % between 2007 and 2009. Persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer, and HPV testing, including self-sampling, has been suggested as an alternative method of cervical cancer screening that may alleviate some barriers to screening. Our objective was to determine whether offering self-collected HPV testing screening increased cervical cancer screening rates in rural communities.

Methods

During the 2-year study, three community-based cohorts were assigned to receive either i) a cervical cancer education campaign with the option of HPV testing; ii) an educational campaign alone; iii) or no intervention. Self-collection kits were offered to eligible women at family medicine clinics and community centres, and participants were surveyed to determine their acceptance of the HPV self-collection kit. Paired proportions testing for before-after studies was used to determine differences in screening rates from baseline, and Chi Square analysis of three dimensional 2 × 2 × 2 tables compared the change between communities.

Results

Cervical cancer screening increased by 15.2 % (p < 0.001) to 67.4 % in the community where self-collection was available, versus a 2.9 % increase (p = 0.07) in the community that received educational campaigns and 8.5 % in the community with no intervention (p = 0.193). The difference in change in rates was statistically significant between communities A and B (p < 0.001) but not between communities A and C (p = 0.193). The response rate was low, with only 9.5 % (168/1760) of eligible women opting to self-collect for HPV testing. Of the women who completed self-collection, 15.5 % (26) had not had a Pap smear in the last 3 years, and 88.7 % reported that they were somewhat or very satisfied with self-collection.

Conclusions

Offering self-collected HPV testing increased the cervical cancer screening rate in a rural NL community. Women who completed self-collection had generally positive feelings about the experience. Offering HPV self-collection may increase screening compliance, particularly among women who do not present for routine Pap smears.

Do women with pain and bleeding in early pregnancy require a vaginal speculum examination as part of their assessment?

AIMS

To investigate whether a vaginal speculum examination (VSE) prior to a transvaginal scan (TVS) alters the diagnosis or management of women who complain of bleeding in early pregnancy.

METHODS

A prospective study. Women were asked to describe their bleeding as heavy, moderate or light and to consent to VSE prior to TVS. TVS was performed to obtain a final diagnosis of pregnancy outcome.

RESULTS

221 consecutive women were included in the study. In 14.5% (n = 32) complaining of heavy bleeding, blood was seen in all but two VSE and 84% (n = 27) had a miscarriage diagnosed by TVS. Products of conception were removed in 18.8% (n = 6), but this did not alter the subsequent immediate management of any cases. 65.2% (n = 144) of women complained of light bleeding, blood was seen on VSE in 53% (n = 77). Of these women, 25% (n = 19) of those where blood was seen had a miscarriage, compared to 6% (n = 4) of women where blood was not seen. A cervical ectropion was visualised in 11.7% (n = 26) and 2.3% (n = 5) had a cervical polyp. No other clinically significant pathology was detected.

CONCLUSION

The amount of bleeding reported by women in early pregnancy relates well with VSE findings. Performing a VSE did not alter the subsequent management of these patients. This study demonstrates that routine objective assessment of blood by a clinician performing VSE prior to a TVS is unnecessary.

Creating a more positive patient experience of pelvic examination

PURPOSE

To explore through descriptive comparative analysis an alternative method of pelvic examination to increase patient comfort.

DATA SOURCES

Sixty-two participants were recruited from a convenience sample of patients at an ambulatory women's healthcare clinic operated by a teaching hospital in the Southwest United States. Twenty-five were examined using the conventional pelvic examination technique; 37 with a new technique that we call the Rad technique, named after a co-author of the study. Three women's health nurse practitioners were trained in both methods and alternated the exam technique used. Visualization of the cervix was measured by clinician responses to the Speculum Exam Questionnaire for Clinicians; level of pain was determined from patient responses to the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Results were analyzed using a t-test for independent samples. Pain was further analyzed using chi-square test of association.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the relationship between the variables of visualization and pain was not statistically significant, 16% of women in the conventional technique group reported vaginal pain compared with 5.4% in the Rad technique group.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Changing from the conventional pelvic examination to the Rad technique may create a more positive patient experience and thereby engage more women in recommended in gynecological health care.

A guide to performing pelvic speculum exams: a patient-centered approach to reducing iatrogenic effects

PURPOSE

Current training in the United States for pelvic speculum examinations (PSEs) has a primary focus on the physician-centered goal of visualizing the cervix but may not inform practitioners of potential iatrogenic effects. Such oversight leaves trainees unprepared and unskilled in preventing and addressing adverse outcomes. This article incorporates a literature review into a step-by-step guide to aid the teaching of PSEs.

SUMMARY

Iatrogenic effects of PSEs may include mild discomfort, extreme pain, anxiety, psychological (re)traumatization, and sexual pain disorders. A literature-based guide is presented to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes, set up the exam room, set up the patient, perform the exam, calm distressed patients, and avoid exam-interfering behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PSEs can lead to adverse outcomes, awareness of the iatrogenic effects allows clinicians to utilize techniques to prevent or reduce negative effects. A method of incorporating techniques described in this article into teaching is provided.

Effect of lubricating gel on patient comfort during vaginal speculum examination: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the efficacy of lubricating gel compared with using water for pain during vaginal speculum insertion.

METHODS

This study was a randomized trial of nonpregnant women aged 18-50 years who required a vaginal speculum examination between February and July 2011. Patients blinded to study assignment underwent vaginal speculum examination using a standardized technique with a medium-sized plastic speculum prepared with either 0.3 mL lubricating gel or 3 mL of water used to cover both speculum blades. Patients recorded pain using a 10-cm visual analog scale immediately after speculum insertion. A pre hoc power analysis determined that 55 patients in each arm would be required to detect a difference of 0.9 cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

A total of 299 consecutive women requiring vaginal speculum examination were screened for enrollment and 120 women were randomized with 60 per group. There were no marked differences in the demographic characteristics of the gel (n=59) and water (n=60) participants available for final analysis. The gel group showed significantly lower pain scores for speculum insertion (mean±standard deviation: 1.41±1.55 compared with water 2.15±1.93, P<.01). Of patients undergoing examination with gel, 20 of 59 (33.9%) marked zero on the pain scale compared with six of 60 (10%) patients receiving water (P=.002). All 73 patients who underwent Pap screening had adequate cytology.

CONCLUSION

Applying a small amount of lubricating gel significantly decreases patient pain during vaginal speculum insertion.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01289665.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

: I.

Having a Pap smear, quality of life before and after cervical screening: a questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of cervical cancer screening in women with normal test results.

DESIGN

Questionnaire study.

SETTING

Maastricht, the Netherlands.

POPULATION

A cohort of 789 women were followed from screening invitation until after the receipt of screening results. A female age-matched reference group (n=567) was included.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to the home address of the women before screening, after screening, and again with the screening results.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Generic HRQoL (SF-12, EQ-5D), generic anxiety (STAI-6), screen-specific anxiety (PCQ), and potential symptoms and feelings related to the smear-taking procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 60% of screening participants completed questionnaire 1(n=924): 803 of these women granted permission to access their files; 789 of these 803 women had normal test results (Pap 1), and were included in the analyses. Generic HRQoL (SF-12, EQ-5D) and anxiety (STAI-6) scores were similar in the study and reference groups. Before screening, after screening, and also after the receipt of test results, screening participants reported less screen-specific anxiety (PCQ, P<0.001) than the reference group (n=567), with differences indicating clinical relevance. 19% of screening participants were bothered by feelings of shame, pain, inconvenience, or nervousness during smear taking, and 8 and 5% of women experienced lower abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, discharge, or urinary problems for 2-3 and 4-7 days, respectively, following the Pap smear.

CONCLUSION

The reduced levels of screen-specific anxiety in screening participants, possibly indicating reassurance, are worthwhile addressing in more depth. We conclude that although considerable numbers of women reported unpleasant effects, there were no adverse HRQoL consequences of cervical screening in women with normal test results.

The challenging pelvic examination

While there is a large body of evidence on the effectiveness of Pap smears for cervical cancer screening and on screening for cervical gonorrhea and Chlamydia, there is sparse evidence to support other portions of the pelvic examination and little guidance on examination logistics. Maximizing comfort should be the goal; lubrication use and careful speculum selection and insertion can ease this intrusive procedure. This is particularly important in adolescent and menopausal women, sexual minorities, obese women, women with disabilities, and women with a history of trauma or prior instrumentation affecting the genitalia. We review the evidence and provide guidance to minimize physical and psychological discomfort with pelvic examination.

Does pelvic exam in the emergency department add useful information?

OBJECTIVE

Physicians are taught that the pelvic exam is a key part of the evaluation of a woman presenting with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding. However, the exam is time consuming and invasive, and its use in the emergency department (ED) has not been prospectively evaluated. We evaluated how often the findings of the pelvic exam changed management in a cohort of consecutive female patients presenting with acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding.

METHODS

We enrolled women who required a pelvic exam together with the providers caring for them in an academic ED from September 2004 to August 2005. We collected the results of the general history and physical exam. The provider was asked to predict the findings of the pelvic exam, and these were compared with the actual findings of the exam.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-three patients were prospectively entered into the study. When compared with predicted findings, the pelvic exam was as expected in 131 patients (72%). In a further 40 patients (22%), the findings of the pelvic exam were not as predicted, but resulted in no change in the clinical plan. In 12 cases (6%) the exam revealed a finding that was both unexpected and changed the clinical plan. Only one of these patients was admitted. Of the 24 patients who were admitted, four had a pelvic exam that revealed unexpected results, but only one of these cases caused the physician to change the care planned for the patient.

CONCLUSION

In 94% of women with acute abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding, the results of the pelvic exam were either predictable or had no effect on the clinical plan. This suggests that there may be a subset of women with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding in whom a pelvic exam may safely be deferred.

Discrepancy between physicians' perceptions and practices during pelvic examinations in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

This study explored (1) physicians' perceptions of pelvic examination (PE) procedures and (2) the discrepancy between physicians' perceptions and their practices as observed by their attending nurses.

METHOD

Data were collected from 20 physician-completed questionnaires on the perceived importance of 23 PE procedures. Each physician's practice of the same 23 PE procedures was assessed by 4-6 attending nurses (100 nurse observations). Physicians and nurses were sampled by convenience from the obstetrics/gynecology outpatient departments of 3 teaching hospitals in central Taiwan. Discrepancies between physicians' perceptions and their practices as assessed by attending nurses were examined by the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Physicians' mean scores ranged from 3.15 to 4.00, indicating that PE procedures were generally perceived as important. The procedures were rank ordered according to the mean scores from highest to lowest. Physicians' 5 top-ranking procedures were wearing gloves during the PE, asking agreement for the examination, paying attention to privacy during the PE, protecting the woman's personal information, and protecting the woman's medical records. Physicians' 5 lowest ranking procedures were telling the woman before inserting the speculum that she will feel some pressure, explaining the procedure before the PE, proactively providing information, asking the woman how she feels during the PE, asking a woman's permission to examine prior to commencing the PE, and describing observations to the woman during the PE (the last two procedures were tied for 5th rank). For 15 of the 23 PE procedures, physicians' perceptions did not differ significantly from their practices as assessed by attending nurses. The remaining 8 procedures were statistically significant between physicians' perception and their practices, and were rated higher by physicians (perception) than by attending nurses (practice).

CONCLUSION

The 5 top-ranking PE procedures in terms of perceived importance were related to procedural behaviors, whereas the 5 lowest ranking procedures were verbal statements with explicit affective content. During nurse-observed PEs, Taiwanese physicians consistently practiced the procedural aspects of PEs they perceived as important (e.g., communication and consultation, protection and skilled technique, and confidentiality). However, physicians' practices were less consistent in affective aspects (e.g., explanation and consent, information and instruction, and sensitivity).

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our results suggest that physicians should concentrate not only on procedural behaviors, but also on affective behaviors. These findings could be incorporated in medical education, particularly for medical students training to become obstetric and gynecological physicians.

PREMATURE CERVICAL CHANGE AND THE USE OF CERVICAL CERCLAGE

Preterm birth and its subsequent consequences continue to be a major challenge worldwide. In the United States in 2004, 12.5% of infants were born preterm, making the annual societal economic burden associated with preterm birth in excess of $26.2 billion (and this is a modest estimate). Spontaneous preterm birth accounts for about 75% of all preterm births; however, at earlier gestations iatrogenic preterm birth accounts for a greater proportion of all preterm births; at 27–28 weeks 50% are iatrogenic. The proportion of babies transferred to the neonatal unit is more than 90% for those born before 33 completed weeks of gestation compared with 31% at 36 weeks; delivery between 33 completed weeks and 36 completed weeks has a relatively low morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, 1 in 3 children born preterm but beyond 32 weeks have educational and behavioural problems at the age of 7, with 1 in 4 children born between 32 and 35 weeks requiring support from non-teaching assistants at school. Although more than 40% of babies at 35 completed weeks show signs of maturity, some still need ventilation at 38 completed weeks. Almost one-fifth of all infants born at less than 32 weeks gestation do not survive the first year of life.