DPP4i, thiazolidinediones, or insulin and risks of cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy with inadequate control

Comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for new-onset gastric cancer and gastric diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risks of gastric cancer and other gastric diseases in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) exposed to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2I), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4I) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1a).

DESIGN

This was a population-based cohort study of prospectively collected data on patients with T2DM prescribed SGLT2I, DPP4I or GLP1a between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2020 from Hong Kong. The outcomes were new-onset gastric cancer, peptic ulcer (PU), acute gastritis, non-acute gastritis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Propensity score matching (1:1) using the nearest neighbour search was performed, and multivariable Cox regression was applied. A three-arm comparison between SGLT2I, DPP4I and GLP1a was conducted using propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

A total of 62,858 patients (median age: 62.2 years old [SD: 12.8]; 55.93% males; SGLT2I: n = 23,442; DPP4I: n = 39,416) were included. In the matched cohort, the incidence of gastric cancer was lower in SGLT2I (Incidence rate per 1000 person-year, IR: 0.32; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.23-0.43) than in DPP4I (IR per 1000 person-year: 1.22; CI 1.03-1.42) users. Multivariable Cox regression found that SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of gastric cancer (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.19-0.48), PU, acute gastritis, non-acute gastritis, and GERD (p < 0.05) compared to DPP4I use. In the three-arm analysis, GLP1a use was associated with higher risks of gastric cancer and GERD compared to SGLT2I use.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SGLT2I was associated with lower risks of new-onset gastric cancer, PU, acute gastritis, non-acute gastritis, and GERD after matching and adjustments compared to DPP4I use. SGLT2I use was associated with lower risks of GERD and gastric cancer compared to GLP1a use.

The Role of Real-World Evidence in Treatment Decision-Making, Regulatory Assessment, and Understanding the Perspectives of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Examples with Gliclazide MR

Real-world evidence (RWE) plays an important role in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). It provides data about the effectiveness and safety of an intervention from outside the randomised controlled trial (RCT) setting and allows healthcare professionals (HCPs) to determine if RCT data are applicable to their patients in routine clinical practice. This review provides a discussion of the value of RWE in T2D management in day-to-day clinical practice, with a focus on RWE with sulfonylureas (SUs), and presents two examples of a new generation of international real-world studies in people with T2D managed in routine clinical practice. RWE plays a valuable role in advising HCPs in the day-to-day management of T2D, informing regulatory authorities with regard to pharmacovigilance and post-approval updates, and providing insights with regard to patients' treatment adherence and preference. RWE should be used alongside RCTs to increase HCP awareness and understanding of their patients' perspectives, potentially allowing for improvements in treatment adherence, glycaemic control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In addition, real-world studies must be conducted in a way that generates robust RWE by limiting the risks of bias and confounding as much as possible. A growing body of RWE is emerging from Asia. For example, in a preliminary HRQoL analysis of the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) Register, Asian people with T2D had better HRQoL with gliclazide-based treatment than with other SU agents, despite being older and having more diabetes-related complications.

Repurposing DPP-4 Inhibitors for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective and Single Center Study

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common causes and the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Its poor prognosis highlights the urgent need for more effective treatments. Repurposing approved drugs is a promising strategy as preclinical screenings can be minimized. The aim of our retrospective study was to investigate the potential of Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4)-inhibitors, which are safe Food and Drug Association (FDA)-approved drugs for treating diabetes, in treating CRC patients. Our findings conclude that CRC patients with diabetes and treated with DPP4-inhibitors in our hospital during 2006–2015, their 5-year prognosis following curative resection was significantly better than those treated with metformin. We further showed that their prognosis was associated with immune cell population features that associated with better prognosis, and immune cell profile is a biomarker for predicting the prognosis of DPP4-inhibitors treated CRC patients.

Abstract

Background: There have been studies reporting the crucial roles of Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) in colorectal cancer (CRC) initiation and progression, whereas DPP4-inhibitors are safe Food and Drug Association (FDA)-approved drugs for treating diabetes. This study aims to investigate the association between DPP4-inhibitor treatment and the prognosis of CRC patients. Methods: Clinical data of CRC patients with diabetes and the prescription of DPP4-inhibitors who had undergone curative surgery in our hospital between January 2006 and December 2015 were retrieved. Their survival data and immune cell population in circulatory blood were compared to those treated with metformin. Results: The DPP4-inhibitor patient group showed a significantly better 5-year disease-free survival (median DFS = 1733 days, 95% CI = 1596 to 1870 days) when compared to the metformin group (p = 0.030, median DFS = 1382 days, 95% CI = 1246 to 1518 days). 33 out of the 92 patients in the metformin group showed recurrence whereas only 3 of the 26 patients in the DPP4-inhibitor group showed recurrence (p = 0.033). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that DPP4-inhibitor application is a favorable factor associated with a lower risk of recurrence (Hazard ratio = 0.200, p = 0.035). Furthermore, our results suggested that the immune cell profile of CRC patients is a potential biomarker for response to DPP4-inhibitor treatment. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the association of DPP4-inhibitor treatment with a better prognosis of CRC patients.