Modelling the benefits of an optimised treatment strategy for 5-ASA in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis

Efficacy of Dose Escalation of Oral 5-Aminosalicylic Acid for Ulcerative Colitis With a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore of 1: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic healing is generally defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≤1 in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, patients with an MES of 1 are at higher relapse risk than those with an MES of 0. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of proactive dose escalation of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in UC patients with an MES of 1.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in 5 hospitals between 2018 and 2022. Ulcerative colitis patients in clinical remission under oral 5-ASA therapy and diagnosed as having an MES of 1 were enrolled. Patients receiving maintenance therapy other than 5-ASA and immunomodulator were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a dose-escalated (intervention) or constant dose (control) of 5-ASA. Concomitant immunomodulator was used as the stratification factor in the randomization. The primary end point was relapse within 1 year. The subgroup analysis was stratified for the use of immunomodulators.

RESULTS

The full analysis set included 79 patients (39 intervention and 40 control). Immunomodulators were used in 20 (25.3%) patients. Relapse was less in the intervention group (15.4%) than the control group (37.5%; P = .026). In the subgroup with concomitant immunomodulators, relapse was also less in the intervention group (10.0%) than the control group (70.0%; P = .020). In patients without immunomodulators, the difference was not significant between 2 groups (intervention, 17.2%; control, 26.7%; P = .53).

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation of 5-ASA reduced relapse within 1 year in UC patients in clinical remission with an MES of 1.

Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Algae-Derived Biomolecules in Gut Health: A Review

Under physiological conditions, the inflammatory response acts as a biological defense against tissue damage or infection, and is rapidly resolved once the infection is cleared. However, chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have become increasingly widespread in the last decades, placing a burden on the quality of life of affected people and on healthcare systems worldwide. Available drug therapies are often ineffective due to the chronic nature of these diseases, and prolonged administration of drugs can result in severe side effects for the patient or a lack of efficacy. In addition, there is the growing problem of bacterial resistance to synthetic antibiotics. Together, these factors have led to a strong research focus on the discovery of natural products capable of treating IBD. Recently, there has been a growing interest in compounds derived from marine sources, mainly algae, due to their bioactive secondary metabolites with anti-inflammatory properties well known in the literature. Based on this evidence, this review aimed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory potential of algae-derived biomolecules in IBD. In particular, interesting species from green algae (e.g., Chlorella vulgaris and Ulva pertusa), brown algae (e.g., Macrocystis pyrifera and Ecklonia cava) and red algae (e.g., Porphyra tenera and Grateloupia turuturu) are included in this review due to their proven anti-inflammatory properties. For this purpose, an extensive literature search was conducted using several databases. The results suggest that both macroalgae and microalgae have remarkable potential for IBD therapy due to the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of their bioactive compounds. However, while the preclinical evidence is encouraging, further and long-term clinical studies are needed to better understand their mechanisms of action in order to determine the true efficacy of marine algae in the treatment of IBD.

Evaluating the Therapeutic Efficacy of Lactobacillus Strains in the Management of Ulcerative Colitis: An Overview of Recent Advances

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) known as a sub-category of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) is a longterm condition that causes inflammation, irritation, and ulcers in the colon and rectum. Though the precise pathogenesis of UC is not fully understood yet, impaired immune responses and imbalanced intestinal microbiome composition have been regarded as two main key players in colitis pathobiology. As conventional treatments are challenged with limitations and side effects, finding a new therapeutic approach has gained increasing attention. Probiotic bacteria with multifunctional health-promoting properties have been considered novel therapeutic options. There is strong evidence indicating that probiotics exert their therapeutic effects mostly by regulating immune system responses and restoring gut microbiome homeostasis. These results validate the rationale behind the clinical application of probiotics in UC management whether prescribed alone or in combination with conventional therapy. This article explores the pathogenesis of UC, concentrating on the influence of immune dysregulation and intestinal microbiome imbalances. Also, it reviews recent in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies that have demonstrated the efficacy of Lactobacillus species in decreasing UC symptoms by modifying immune responses, restoring gut microbiota balance, and promoting intestinal barrier function.

Optimizing 5-aminosalicylate for moderate ulcerative colitis: expert recommendations from the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition

The lack of clear definition and classification for "moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)" creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.

Persistence of newly prescribed 5-aminosalicylic acid in patients with ulcerative colitis: A nationwide comprehensive database study

The 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) agents are first-line drugs for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, intolerance as well as other issues have been reported for these drugs, making it difficult to sustain this treatment; accordingly, the persistence of 5-ASA is an important indicator of UC treatment strategy. We aimed to analyze the persistence of 5-ASA in patients with UC in Japan. This was a 1-year, nationwide, population-based cohort study using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. We identified patients who were assigned UC-related disease codes and newly prescribed 5-ASA between April 2015 and September 2019 and specified the number of days until 5-ASA prescriptions were interrupted during a follow-up of up to 365 days. Among the 137 million patients who were covered by the universal health insurance in Japan during the study period, 68,234 eligible patients were identified. The 5-ASA persistence in these patients were 87.2%, 65.6%, and 56.4% after 30, 180, and 365 days, respectively. The 5-ASA persistence by subtype at 365 days was 54.4%, 56.4%, and 57.6% for time-dependent, pH-dependent, and multi-matrix system types, respectively. The 5-ASA persistence rate after 365 days was 65.0% for those under 20 years of age, 51.0% for those 20-39 years old, 57.5% for those 40-64 years old, and 65.5% for those over 64 years of age. This study revealed the 1-year persistence of newly prescribed 5-ASA in patients with UC newly prescribed 5-ASA in Japan, based on a national claims database of more than 100 million individuals.

Sustained release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from azoreductase-responsive polymeric prodrugs for prolonged colon-targeted colitis therapy

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a challenging inflammatory gastrointestinal disorder, whose therapies encounter limitations in overcoming insufficient colonic retention and rapid systemic clearance. In this study, we report an innovative polymeric prodrug nanoformulation for targeted UC treatment through sustained 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) delivery. Amphiphilic polymer-based 13.5 nm micelles were engineered to incorporate azo-linked 5-ASA prodrug motifs, enabling cleavage via colonic azoreductases. In vitro, micelles exhibited excellent stability under gastric/intestinal conditions while demonstrating controlled 5-ASA release over 24 h in colonic fluids. Orally administered micelles revealed prolonged 24-h retention and a high accumulation within inflamed murine colonic tissue. At an approximately 60% dose reduction from those most advanced recent studies, the platform halted DSS colitis progression and outperformed standard 5-ASA therapy through a 77-97% suppression of inflammatory markers. Histological analysis confirmed intact colon morphology and restored barrier protein expression. This integrated prodrug nanoformulation addresses limitations in colon-targeted UC therapy through localized bioactivation and tailored pharmacokinetics, suggesting the potential of nanotechnology-guided precision delivery to transform disease management.

Practical management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: an international expert consensus

INTRODUCTION

Although there are well-defined guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC), there are still unmet needs. For this reason, we conducted an international expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild-to-moderate UC and provide practical guidance to clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

Based on Delphi methodology, 15 statements were approved after two rounds of voting, addressing several aspects of disease management from sequencing to treatment duration, from monitoring to optimization techniques and safety profile.

EXPERT OPINION

Growing knowledge of mild-to-moderate UC has led to the development of new ambitious outcomes such as histological remission and disease clearance. Furthermore, noninvasive tools for patient monitoring such as fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound are now available. Their implementation in clinical practice will allow clinicians to tightly monitor disease activity and promptly adapt treatment, avoiding complications and disease progression and targeting better disease control.

Mucoadhesive Mesalamine Prodrug Nanoassemblies to Target Intestinal Macrophages for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

While mesalamine, a 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), is pivotal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through both step-up and top-down approaches in clinical settings, its widespread utilization is limited by low bioavailability at the desired site of action due to rapid and extensive absorption in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Addressing mesalamine's pharmacokinetic challenges, here, we introduce nanoassemblies composed exclusively of a mesalamine prodrug that pairs 5-ASA with a mucoadhesive and cathepsin B-cleavable peptide. In an IBD model, orally administered nanoassemblies demonstrate enhanced accumulation and sustained retention in the GI tract due to their mucoadhesive properties and the epithelial enhanced permeability and retention (eEPR) effect. This retention enables the efficient uptake by intestinal pro-inflammatory macrophages expressing high cathepsin B, triggering a burst release of the 5-ASA. This cascade fosters the polarization toward an M2 macrophage phenotype, diminishes inflammatory responses, and simultaneously facilitates the delivery of active agents to adjacent epithelial cells. Therefore, the nanoassemblies show outstanding therapeutic efficacy in inhibiting local inflammation and contribute to suppressing systemic inflammation by restoring damaged intestinal barriers. Collectively, this study highlights the promising role of the prodrug nanoassemblies in enhancing targeted drug delivery, potentially broadening the use of mesalamine in managing IBD.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of Tivozanib data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system

Background

Tivozanib, a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in a phase III clinical trials for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. However, comprehensive evaluation of its long-term safety profile in a large sample population remains elusive. The current study assessed Tivozanib-related adverse events of real-world through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Methods

Disproportionality analyses, utilizing reporting odds ratio proportional reporting ratio Bayesian confidence propagation neural network and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms, were conducted to quantify signals of Tivozanib-related AEs. Weibull distribution was used to predict the varying risk incidence of AEs over time.

Results

Out of 5,361,420 reports collected from the FAERS database, 1,366 reports of Tivozanib-associated AEs were identified. A total of 94 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) conforming to the four algorithms simultaneously were retained. The most common AEs included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, blood pressure increased, decreased appetite, and dysphonia, consistent with prior specifications and clinical trials. Unexpected significant AEs such as dyspnea, constipation, pain in extremity, stomatitis, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome was observed. The median onset time of Tivozanib-related AEs was 37 days (interquartile range [IQR] 11.75-91 days), with a majority (n = 127, 46.35%) occurring within the initial month following Tivozanib initiation.

Conclusion

Our observations align with clinical assertions regarding Tivozanib's safety profile. Additionally, we unveil potential novel and unexpected AE signatures associated with Tivozanib administration, highlighting the imperative for prospective clinical studies to validate these findings and elucidate their causal relationships. These results furnish valuable evidence to steer future clinical inquiries aimed at elucidating the safety profile of Tivozanib.

Management and treatment optimization of patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with a significant health-care burden worldwide. While medical therapy aims to induce and maintain remission, optimal management of mild to moderate UC remains challenging due to heterogeneity in severity classifications and non-standardized approaches. This comprehensive review summarizes current evidence and knowledge gaps to optimize clinical decision-making in patients with mild to moderate UC.

AREAS COVERED

After an extensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase through August 2023, we provide an overview of definitions utilized to characterize mild to moderate UC severity and established therapeutic targets. Current medical treatments including mesalazine formulations, corticosteroids, and their combinations are surveyed. The role of emerging intestinal ultrasound, telemedicine, and home testing is explored. Individualized, patient-centered paradigms aiming to streamline care delivery through proactive identification of relapses are also examined.

EXPERT OPINION

Addressing inconsistencies in disease activity stratification will better align tailored regimens with each patient's profile. Advancing noninvasive technologies like ultrasound criteria and home testing could improve UC management by enabling personalized models. Realizing individualized plans through informed shared-decision making between health-care providers and fully engaged patients holds promise to maximize quality of life outcomes. Continuous improvement relies on innovation bridging different domains to overcome current limitations and push the field toward more predictive and tailored care.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of mesalazine data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system

Background: Mesalazine, a preparation of 5-aminosalicylic acid, is a medication widely used in clinical practice as a first-line therapy in the treatment of mild and moderate inflammatory bowel disease. However, the long-term safety of mesalazine in large sample population was unknown. The current study was to assess mesalazine -related adverse events of real-world through data mining of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: Disproportionality analyses, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms were employed to quantify the signals of mesalazine -associated AEs. Results: Out of 14,149,980 reports collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database, 24,284 reports of mesalazine -associated AEs were identified. A total of 170 significant disproportionality preferred terms conforming to the four algorithms simultaneously were retained. The most common AEs included colitis ulcerative, diarrhoea, condition aggravated, crohn's disease, fatigue, abdominal pain, nausea, haematochezia, which were corresponding to those reported in the specification and clinical trials. Unexpected significant AEs as dizziness, drug ineffective, drug hypersensitivity, infection, off label use, weight decreased, decreased appetite, arthralgia, rash might also occur. The median onset time of mesalazine -related AEs was 1,127 days (interquartile range [IQR] 1,127-1,674 days), and most of the cases occurred 2 years later (n = 610, 70.93%) and within the first 1 month (n = 89, 10.35%) after mesalazine initiation. Conclusion: Results of our study were consistent with clinical observations. We also found potential new and unexpected AEs signals for mesalazine, suggesting prospective clinical studies were needed to confirm these results and illustrate their relationship. Our results could provide valuable evidence for further safety studies of mesalazine.

Lack of Benefit for Early Escalation to Advanced Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence

Although ulcerative colitis [UC] shares many common pathways and therapeutic options with Crohn's disease [CD], CD patients are four times more likely to undergo surgery 10 years into their disease in the biological era and are more likely to have extraintestinal manifestations than UC patients. Early treatment in CD has been demonstrated to modify the natural history of the disease and potentially delay surgery. Previous reviews on this topic have borrowed their evidence from CD to make UC-specific recommendations. This review highlights the emergence of UC-specific data from larger cohort studies and a comprehensive individual patient data systemic review and meta-analysis to critically appraise evidence on the utility of early escalation to advanced therapies with respect to short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes. In UC, the utility of the early escalation concept for the purposes of changing the natural history, including reducing colectomy and hospitalizations, is not supported by the available data. Data on targeting clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes are needed to demonstrate that they are meaningful with regard to achieving reductions in hospitalization and surgery, improving quality of life, and minimizing disability. Analyses of different populations of UC patients, such as those with 'relapsing & remitting' disease or with severe or complicated disease course, are urgently needed. The costs and risk/benefit profile of some of the newer advanced therapies should be carefully considered. In this clinical landscape, it appears premature to advocate an indiscriminate 'one size fits all' approach to escalating to advanced therapies early during the course of UC.

Treatment of Patients with Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Middle East Expert Consensus

The prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Middle East is increasing, impacting the economic and healthcare burden. The management of patients with mild to moderate UC is still a challenge as several factors can affect optimal care, including drug choice, induction and maintenance dose, treatment optimization and de-escalation, therapy duration, monitoring, and safety profile. We conducted an expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild to moderate UC. Sixteen experts in inflammatory bowel diseases, through a well-established and accepted Delphi methodology, voted and approved eight statements in order to provide practical guidance to clinicians in the Middle East.

Non-invasive monitoring and treat-to-target approach are cost-effective in patients with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

There are no data to assess the value associated with a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy based on tight control of mild-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To assess the cost-effectiveness of a T2T approach based on the normalisation of clinical signs and faecal calprotectin (FC) METHODS: A decision analytical Markov model was developed to compare T2T algorithm combining clinical symptoms and FC levels to define treatment response and the possible switch to the next treatment line (T2T-FC), and the reference strategy based only on symptoms. The model included five treatment lines and was conducted from the Italian national health service (NHS) perspective using a 3-year time horizon. The model calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio as € per relapse avoided. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The cost-effectiveness analysis produced an increased time spent by a patient in clinical remission and FC ≤ 100 level (+0.177 years; about 2 months) and a decreasing number of relapses (-0.1937; -20.9%) per patient using a T2T-FC approach compared to only symptoms. Furthermore, the T2T-FC was associated with higher cost (+€1795). The ICER estimated was €9263 per relapse avoided. These results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

T2T-FC approach resulted in a higher benefit for mild-moderate UC patients in terms of time in remission and incidence of relapse but was associated with higher costs. Clinical trials and real-world clinical studies are needed to provide additional data on the cost-benefit of this approach.

Significance of 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Intolerance in the Clinical Management of Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Two major types of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA)-containing preparations, namely, mesalazine/5-ASA and sulfasalazine (SASP), are currently used as first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis. Recent reports show that optimization of 5-ASA therapy is beneficial for both patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Although 5-ASA and SASP have good efficacy and safety profiles, clinicians occasionally encounter patients who develop 5-ASA intolerance.

SUMMARY

The most common symptoms of acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome are exacerbation of diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain. Patients who discontinue 5-ASA therapy because of intolerance have a higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes, such as hospital admission, colectomy, need for advanced therapies, and loss of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics. When patients develop symptoms of 5-ASA intolerance, the clinician should consider changing the type of 5-ASA preparation. Recent genome-wide association studies and meta-analyses have shown that 5-ASA allergy is associated with certain single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Although there are no modalities or biomarkers for diagnosing 5-ASA intolerance, the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test can be used to assist in the diagnosis of acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome with high specificity and low sensitivity. This review presents a general overview of 5-ASA and SASP in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and discusses the latest insights into 5-ASA intolerance.

KEY MESSAGES

5-ASA is used as first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis. Optimization of 5-ASA may be beneficial for patient outcomes and healthcare systems. Acute 5-ASA intolerance syndrome is characterized by diarrhea, fever, and abdominal pain. Periodic renal function monitoring is recommended for patients receiving 5-ASA.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatments and Predictive Biomarkers of Therapeutic Response

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract with a highly heterogeneous presentation. It has a relapsing and remitting clinical course that necessitates lifelong monitoring and treatment. Although the availability of a variety of effective therapeutic options including immunomodulators and biologics (such as TNF, CAM inhibitors) has led to a paradigm shift in the treatment outcomes and clinical management of IBD patients, some patients still either fail to respond or lose their responsiveness to therapy over time. Therefore, according to the recent Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE-II) recommendations, continuous disease monitoring from symptomatic relief to endoscopic healing along with short- and long-term therapeutic responses are critical for providing IBD patients with a tailored therapy algorithm. Moreover, considering the high unmet need for novel therapeutic approaches for IBD patients, various new modulators of cytokine signaling events (for example, JAK/TYK inhibitors), inhibitors of cytokines (for example IL-12/IL-23, IL-22, IL-36, and IL-6 inhibitors), anti-adhesion and migration strategies (for example, β7 integrin, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, and stem cells), as well as microbial-based therapeutics to decolonize the bed buds (for example, fecal microbiota transplantation and bacterial inhibitors) are currently being evaluated in different phases of controlled clinical trials. This review aims to offer a comprehensive overview of available treatment options and emerging therapeutic approaches for IBD patients. Furthermore, predictive biomarkers for monitoring the therapeutic response to different IBD therapies are also discussed.