1
|
McSween-Cadieux E, Lane J, Hong QN, Houle AA, Lauzier-Jobin F, Saint-Pierre Mousset E, Prigent O, Ziam S, Poder T, Lesage A, Dagenais P. Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:22. [PMID: 38351054 PMCID: PMC10863098 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01105-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has required evidence to be made available more rapidly than usual, in order to meet the needs of decision makers in a timely manner. These exceptional circumstances have caused significant challenges for organizations and teams responsible for evidence synthesis. They had to adapt to provide rapid responses to support decision-making. This study aimed to document (1) the challenges and adaptations made to produce rapid responses during the pandemic, (2) their perceived usefulness, reported use and factors influencing their use and (3) the methodological adaptations made to produce rapid responses. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted in 2021 with eight organizations in the health and social services system in Quebec (Canada), including three institutes with a provincial mandate. Data collection included focus groups (n = 9 groups in 8 organizations with 64 participants), interviews with decision makers (n = 12), and a document analysis of COVID-19 rapid responses (n = 128). A thematic analysis of qualitative data (objectives 1 and 2) and a descriptive analysis of documents (objective 3) were conducted. RESULTS The results highlight the teams and organizations' agility to deal with the many challenges encountered during the pandemic (e.g., increased their workloads, adoption of new technological tools or work processes, improved collaboration, development of scientific monitoring, adaptation of evidence synthesis methodologies and products). The challenge of balancing rigor and speed was reported by teams and organizations. When available at the right time, rapid responses have been reported as a useful tool for informing or justifying decisions in a context of uncertainty. Several factors that may influence their use were identified (e.g., clearly identify needs, interactions with producers, perceived rigor and credibility, precise and feasible recommendations). Certain trends in the methodological approaches used to speed up the evidence synthesis process were identified. CONCLUSIONS This study documented rapid responses producers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec, and decision makers who requested, consulted, or used these products. Potential areas of improvements are identified such as reinforce coordination, improve communication loops, clarify guidelines or methodological benchmarks, and enhance utility of rapid response products for decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther McSween-Cadieux
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
- Centre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
| | - Julie Lane
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Centre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Quan Nha Hong
- School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Andrée-Anne Houle
- Centre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Department of Psychoeducation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - François Lauzier-Jobin
- Centre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Eliane Saint-Pierre Mousset
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Centre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Ollivier Prigent
- Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Saliha Ziam
- School of Business Administration, Université TÉLUQ, Montreal, Canada
| | - Thomas Poder
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), CIUSSS-de-l'Est-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Management, Evaluation and Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alain Lesage
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), CIUSSS-de-l'Est-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pierre Dagenais
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuchenmüller T, Boeira LDS. Routinizing the Use of Evidence in Policy - What Is Needed? Comment on "Sustaining Knowledge Translation Practices: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis". Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7604. [PMID: 37579417 PMCID: PMC10461956 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
In their study of sustaining knowledge translation (KT) practices, Borst et al found that this process is an interplay of: (i) constructing and extending networks, (ii) creating contexts that support KT practices, and (iii) understanding how actors create, maintain, and disrupt institutions. Their article is an important contribution to the body of research promoting KT. In this commentary we reflect on the convergences and differences between the concepts of 'sustaining' and 'institutionalizing' KT, highlighting domains and processes related to the institutionalization, providing an analysis of KT landscape in Brazil and making a case for the need to increase countries' routine use of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Kuchenmüller
- Research for Health, Science Division, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lang T. Enabling evidence to tackle everyday diseases to mitigate another pandemic. Gates Open Res 2022; 6:45. [PMID: 35923865 PMCID: PMC9296833 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13497.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The next emergent novel pathogen is likely to occur where the ability to undertake health research and collect life-saving data is lacking. Without embedded and ongoing research activities in place spotting and stopping a new threat is not possible, thereby enabling undetected infection and unchecked transmission within a community. Without local existing capabilities to collect such data delay is catastrophic. Fundamental goals in pandemic preparedness should be to stop an outbreak before it becomes a pandemic. This requires immediate action from teams already in place with the right skills, this could be readily achieved if we shift our thinking and enable research capabilities to be present in every healthcare setting. Addressing fundamental gaps in health research capacity and equity could tackle this and then we would be better prepared, globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudie Lang
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bastani P, Bahmaei J, Kharazinejad E, Samadbeik M, Liang Z, Schneider CH. How COVID-19 affects the use of evidence informed policymaking among iranian health policymakers and managers. Arch Public Health 2022; 80:16. [PMID: 34983653 PMCID: PMC8727233 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-021-00757-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic increased the need for new valid scientific evidence to support urgent clinical and policy decision making; as well as improved processes for the rapid synthesis, uptake and application of that evidence. Evidence informed policymaking (EIPM) can be considered as a way to access and use the results of evidence in practice. This study aimed to determine what effects COVID-19 had on the way Iranian health managers and policymakers use evidence in their decisions. METHODS This study was conducted in 2021 applying a qualitative research design. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews. Thirty health care managers, policy makers and medical university faculty members were recruited as the study participants, initially via a purposive sample, followed by snowballing. A conventional content analysis presented by Hsieh and Shannon (2005) was applied for data analysis. RESULTS Ten main themes emerged from the data including: 1) roles and duties of knowledge brokers (KBs); 2-5) the roles, benefits, barriers and necessities of applying Knowledge Translation Exchange (KTE) tools; 6-8) the facilitators, benefits and barriers to the application of evidence during COVID-19; 9) challenges of rapid evidence production evidence during COVID-19 and 10) consequences of not applying evidence during COVID-19. According to the present conceptual framework, KBs act as an intermediator between the large amounts of knowledge produced and decision makers. KTE tools should be applied to enhance EIPM during COVID-19. Attention should be paid to the facilitators, barriers, benefits and necessities of evidence application during COVID-19 to avoid negative consequences for the health system. CONCLUSIONS Results of this study show that developing KTE tools and activating KBs can be among the main strategies to produce applied actionable messages for policymakers to move toward EIPM; and that this applies even when rapid decision making is required, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is strongly recommended to reinforce the local capacities through supporting scientific networks and relationships between research centers and local and national policymakers. At the same time, attention to local barriers to and facilitators of the application of evidence while facing a pandemic can pave the way to better identification of health system`s problems and rapid responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peivand Bastani
- Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Jamshid Bahmaei
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Ebrahim Kharazinejad
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
| | - Mahnaz Samadbeik
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
- Centre for Online Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Zhanming Liang
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropic Health and Medicine, James Cook University, 4811, Townsville, Qld, Australia
| | - Carmen Huckel Schneider
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kuchenmüller T, Lavis J, Kheirandish M, Reveiz L, Reinap M, Okeibunor J, Siswanto S, Rashidian A, Sieber S, Moat K, Mansilla C, El-Jardali F, Helble M, Reeder J, Chapman E, Barreto JOM, Mandil A, Swaminathan S. Time for a new global roadmap for supporting evidence into action. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000677. [PMID: 36962468 PMCID: PMC10022000 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Kuchenmüller
- Science Division, Department of Research for Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - John Lavis
- McMaster Health Forum/WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy, and Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Mehrnaz Kheirandish
- Department of Science, Information and Dissemination, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ludovic Reveiz
- Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health and Incident Management System for COVID-19, WHO Regional Office for the Americas/Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Marge Reinap
- Division of Country Health Policies and System, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joseph Okeibunor
- Research Development and Innovation, Assistant Regional Director's Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| | - Siswanto Siswanto
- Healthier Population and Non-Communicable Disease Department, WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India
| | - Arash Rashidian
- Department of Science, Information and Dissemination, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Samuel Sieber
- Science Division, Department of Research for Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kaelan Moat
- McMaster Health Forum/WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policy, and Department of Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Cristian Mansilla
- Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health and Incident Management System for COVID-19, WHO Regional Office for the Americas/Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Fadi El-Jardali
- Knowledge to Policy (K2P) Center/WHO Collaborating Centre for Evidence-Informed Policymaking and Practice, and Department of Health Management and Policy, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Matthias Helble
- Science Division, Department of Research for Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - John Reeder
- Science Division, Department of Research for Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
- Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Ahmed Mandil
- Department of Science, Information and Dissemination, WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Soumya Swaminathan
- Office of Chief Scientist, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hussey P, Das S. A micro credential for interoperability. OPEN RESEARCH EUROPE 2021; 1:109. [PMID: 37645197 PMCID: PMC10446011 DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.14083.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
In the midst of a global pandemic the need for health and social care providers to commit to, and deliver on, integrated patient-centered care services has been accelerated. Globally, health and social care programme administrators are turning to digital devices and applications to provide supporting infrastructure which can offer safe access to health information at the point of care. Digitalisation is increasingly considered a key requirement to support diagnostics and therapeutic care services in health care delivery. The open source community are responding to this need to advance integrated care and digital services by providing targeted resources to address the interoperability challenge. Addressing interoperability in health systems is a core part of achieving sustainable enterprise wide integrated care. Using Open Innovation 2.0 methods for advancing knowledge on interoperability, this paper describes the development of a micro credential for knowledge transfer on interoperability created by the Centre for eIntegrated Care (CeIC). Designed and developed to signpost interested stakeholders to targeted material and build understanding and capacity on the topic. The design approach and initial resource content are explained through the lens of a specific research project funded by an Elite S Fellowship to advance leadership and standardisation for Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Hussey
- CeIC, ADAPT, School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Dublin, D09W6Y4, Ireland
| | - Subhashis Das
- CeIC, ADAPT, School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Dublin, D09W6Y4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|