1
|
Khemai C, Leão DLL, Janssen DJA, Schols JMGA, Meijers JMM. Interprofessional collaboration in palliative dementia care. J Interprof Care 2024; 38:675-694. [PMID: 38757957 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2024.2345828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is essential for high-quality palliative care (PC) for persons with dementia. The aim of this scoping review was to identify IPC approaches in palliative dementia care and explore the elements constituting these approaches. We performed a search in PubMed, CINAHL, and PsychINFO using the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' manual and PRISMA guidelines, and conducted content analysis of the included articles. In total, 28 articles were included, which described 16 IPC approaches in palliative dementia care. The content analysis revealed three overall elements of these approaches: 1) collaborative themes, 2) collaborative processes, and 3) resources facilitating collaboration. Frequently reported collaborative themes embraced pain management and providing care in the dying phase. These themes were addressed through intertwined collaborative processes including communication, coordination, assessing and monitoring, and reflecting and evaluating. To ensure optimal IPC in palliative dementia care, various resources were required, such as PC knowledge, skills to manage symptoms, skills to communicate with collaborators, and a facilitating environment. In conclusion, the identified IPC approaches in palliative dementia care involve diverse collaborating professionals who mainly manage symptoms, prepare for the dying phase and require material and immaterial resources to enable optimal IPC in palliative dementia care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Khemai
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - D L L Leão
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - D J A Janssen
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, the Netherlands
| | - J M G A Schols
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J M M Meijers
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Living Lab in Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Zuyderland Care, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hogeling L, Lammers C, Vaandrager L, Koelen M. What works for vulnerable families? Interpretations of effective health promotion. Health Promot Int 2021; 37:6321598. [PMID: 34297115 PMCID: PMC8851350 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daab108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Under the umbrella of the Healthy Futures Nearby programme, 46 small-scale projects were funded to promote changes in health-related behaviours (smoking, alcohol, diet and exercise) and to improve perceived health among vulnerable families in the Netherlands. The evaluation of these health-related multiple project programmes is often based on funder-defined outcomes and strategies. However, within the funded projects, assumptions about improving the health of vulnerable families based on local knowledge and experiences will also shape the project outcomes and strategies. These additional outcomes and strategies are project-specific interpretations of effective health promotion. Knowing these interpretations is crucial for the policy related and scientific relevance of the evaluation. Therefore, we aimed to determine the interpretations of each project and how they translate into relevant inputs for the overall evaluation of the programme. Based on 46 semi-structured group interviews with local project stakeholders, we produced a list of assumptions about what health promotion for vulnerable families should look like and then identified five main clusters: (i) strategies of offering pre-defined, health (behaviour)-related activities to families, (ii) actively involving vulnerable families in the initiative, (iii) assumptions about how health promotion should start with or include non-health-related topics, (iv) assumptions on how one should build on what already exists in the local context of the families and (v) assumptions on the role of the (health) professional in health promotion among vulnerable families. These project interpretations of effective health promotion provide inputs and priorities for the HFN programme’s overall evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lette Hogeling
- Chair Group Health and Society, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
| | - Christianne Lammers
- Chair Group Health and Society, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
| | - Lenneke Vaandrager
- Chair Group Health and Society, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Koelen
- Chair Group Health and Society, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Librada-Flores S, Nabal-Vicuña M, Forero-Vega D, Muñoz-Mayorga I, Guerra-Martín MD. Implementation Models of Compassionate Communities and Compassionate Cities at the End of Life: A Systematic Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E6271. [PMID: 32872244 PMCID: PMC7504622 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
In the last decade, we have seen a growth of Compassionate Communities and Cities (CCC) at the end of life. There has been an evolution of organizations that help construct Community-Based Palliative Care programs. The objective is to analyze the implementation, methodology and effectiveness of the CCC models at the end of life. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA ScR Guideline. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017068501). Five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL and Google Scholar) were searched for studies (from 2000 to 2018) using set eligibility criteria. Three reviewers screened full-texts articles and extracted study data. Outcomes were filled in a registration form which included a narrative synthesis of each article. We screened 1975 records. We retrieved 112 articles and included 31 articles for the final analysis: 17 descriptive studies, 4 interventions studies, 4 reviews and 6 qualitative studies. A total of 11 studies regard the development models of CCC at the end of life, 15 studies were about evaluation of compassionate communities' programs and 5 studies were about protocols for the development of CCC programs. There is poor evidence of the implementation and evaluation models of CCC at the end of life. There is little and low-/very low-quality evidence about CCC development and assessment models. We found no data published on care intervention in advance disease and end of life. A global model for the development and evaluation of CCC at the end of life seems to be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - María Nabal-Vicuña
- Palliative Care Team, Arnau de Villanova Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain; (M.N.-V.); (D.F.-V.)
| | - Diana Forero-Vega
- Palliative Care Team, Arnau de Villanova Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain; (M.N.-V.); (D.F.-V.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kochovska S, Garcia MV, Bunn F, Goodman C, Luckett T, Parker D, Phillips JL, Sampson EL, van der Steen JT, Agar MR. Components of palliative care interventions addressing the needs of people with dementia living in long-term care: A systematic review. Palliat Med 2020; 34:454-492. [PMID: 32013780 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319900141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with dementia requiring palliative care have multiple needs, which are amplified in long-term care settings. The European Association for Palliative Care White Paper offers recommendations for optimal palliative care in dementia integral for this population, providing useful guidance to inform interventions addressing their specific needs. AIM The aim of this study is to describe the components of palliative care interventions for people with dementia in long-term care focusing on shared decision-making and examine their alignment to the European Association for Palliative Care domains of care. DESIGN Systematic review with narrative synthesis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42018095649). DATA SOURCES Four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and CENTRAL) were searched (earliest records - July 2019) for peer-reviewed articles and protocols in English, reporting on palliative care interventions for people with dementia in long-term care, addressing European Association for Palliative Care Domains 2 (person-centred) or 3 (setting care goals) and ⩾1 other domain. RESULTS Fifty-one papers were included, reporting on 32 studies. For each domain (1-10), there were interventions found aiming to address its goal, although no single intervention addressed all domains. Domain 7 (symptom management; n = 19), 6 (avoiding overly aggressive treatment; n = 18) and 10 (education; n = 17) were the most commonly addressed; Domain 5 (prognostication; n = 7) and 4 (continuity of care; n = 2) were the least addressed. CONCLUSION Almost all domains were addressed across all interventions currently offered for this population to various degrees, but not within a singular intervention. Future research optimally needs to be theory driven when developing dementia-specific interventions at the end of life, with the European Association for Palliative Care domains serving as a foundation to inform the best care for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slavica Kochovska
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Maja V Garcia
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Frances Bunn
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Tim Luckett
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah Parker
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Centre for Dementia Palliative Care Research, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jenny T van der Steen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Meera R Agar
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hum AYM, Wu HY, Ali NB, Leong IYO, Chin JJ, Lee AOK, Tay RY, Koh MYH. The dignity in advanced dementia (diadem) study: Developing an integrated geriatric palliative homecare program. PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/09699260.2018.1442286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Allyn YM Hum
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- The Palliative Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| | - Huei Yaw Wu
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- The Palliative Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| | | | - Ian YO Leong
- Continuing and Community Care, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jing Jih Chin
- Continuing and Community Care, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Ri Yin Tay
- The Palliative Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
- Dover Park Hospice, Singapore
| | - Mervyn YH Koh
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- The Palliative Centre for Excellence in Research and Education, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sampson EL, Candy B, Davis S, Gola AB, Harrington J, King M, Kupeli N, Leavey G, Moore K, Nazareth I, Omar RZ, Vickerstaff V, Jones L. Living and dying with advanced dementia: A prospective cohort study of symptoms, service use and care at the end of life. Palliat Med 2018; 32:668-681. [PMID: 28922625 PMCID: PMC5987852 DOI: 10.1177/0269216317726443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing number of people are dying with advanced dementia. Comfort and quality of life are key goals of care. AIMS To describe (1) physical and psychological symptoms, (2) health and social care service utilisation and (3) care at end of life in people with advanced dementia. DESIGN 9-month prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Greater London, England, people with advanced dementia (Functional Assessment Staging Scale 6e and above) from 14 nursing homes or their own homes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES At study entry and monthly: prescriptions, Charlson Comorbidity Index, pressure sore risk/severity (Waterlow Scale/Stirling Scale, respectively), acute medical events, pain (Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory), quality of life (Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale), resource use (Resource Utilization in Dementia Questionnaire and Client Services Receipt Inventory), presence/type of advance care plans, interventions, mortality, place of death and comfort (Symptom Management at End of Life in Dementia Scale). RESULTS Of 159 potential participants, 85 were recruited (62% alive at end of follow-up). Pain (11% at rest, 61% on movement) and significant agitation (54%) were common and persistent. Aspiration, dyspnoea, septicaemia and pneumonia were more frequent in those who died. In total, 76% had 'do not resuscitate' statements, less than 40% advance care plans. Most received primary care visits, there was little input from geriatrics or mental health but contact with emergency paramedics was common. CONCLUSION People with advanced dementia lived with distressing symptoms. Service provision was not tailored to their needs. Longitudinal multidisciplinary input could optimise symptom control and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Sampson
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,2 Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust Liaison Psychiatry Team, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Buylova Gola
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Harrington
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael King
- 3 Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gerry Leavey
- 4 The Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK
| | - Kirsten Moore
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- 5 Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rumana Z Omar
- 6 Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.,5 Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- 1 Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moore KJ, Candy B, Davis S, Gola A, Harrington J, Kupeli N, Vickerstaff V, King M, Leavey G, Nazareth I, Omar RZ, Jones L, Sampson EL. Implementing the compassion intervention, a model for integrated care for people with advanced dementia towards the end of life in nursing homes: a naturalistic feasibility study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e015515. [PMID: 28694253 PMCID: PMC5541605 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people with dementia die in nursing homes, but quality of care may be suboptimal. We developed the theory-driven 'Compassion Intervention' to enhance end-of-life care in advanced dementia. OBJECTIVES To (1) understand how the Intervention operated in nursing homes in different health economies; (2) collect preliminary outcome data and costs of an interdisciplinary care leader (ICL) to facilitate the Intervention; (3) check the Intervention caused no harm. DESIGN A naturalistic feasibility study of Intervention implementation for 6 months. SETTINGS Two nursing homes in northern London, UK. PARTICIPANTS Thirty residents with advanced dementia were assessed of whom nine were recruited for data collection; four of these residents' family members were interviewed. Twenty-eight nursing home and external healthcare professionals participated in interviews at 7 (n=19), 11 (n=19) and 15 months (n=10). INTERVENTION An ICL led two core Intervention components: (1) integrated, interdisciplinary assessment and care; (2) education and support for paid and family carers. DATA COLLECTED Process and outcome data were collected. Symptoms were recorded monthly for recruited residents. Semistructured interviews were conducted at 7, 11 and 15 months with nursing home staff and external healthcare professionals and at 7 months with family carers. ICL hours were costed using Department of Health and Health Education England tariffs. RESULTS Contextual differences were identified between sites: nursing home 2 had lower involvement with external healthcare services. Core components were implemented at both sites but multidisciplinary meetings were only established in nursing home 1. The Intervention prompted improvements in advance care planning, pain management and person-centred care; we observed no harm. Six-month ICL costs were £18 255. CONCLUSIONS Implementation was feasible to differing degrees across sites, dependent on context. Our data inform future testing to identify the Intervention's effectiveness in improving end-of-life care in advanced dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02840318: Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten J Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Gola
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Harrington
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gerard Leavey
- Bamford Centre for Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Derry Londonderry, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK
| | - Rumana Z Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sullivan DO, Mannix M, Timmons S. Integrated Care Pathways and Care Bundles for Dementia in Acute Care: Concept Versus Evidence. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2017; 32:189-193. [PMID: 28403628 PMCID: PMC10852763 DOI: 10.1177/1533317517698791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2024]
Abstract
Caring for people with dementia in acute settings is challenging and confounded by multiple comorbidities and difficulties transitioning between community and acute care. Recently, there has been an increase in the development and use of integrated care pathways (ICPs) and care bundles for defined illnesses and medical procedures, and these are now being promoted for use in dementia care in acute settings. We present a review of the literature on ICPs and/or care bundles for dementia care in the acute sector. This includes a literature overview including "gray literature" such as relevant websites, reports, and government publications. Taken together, there is clearly a growing interest in and clinical use of ICPs and care bundles for dementia. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of ICPs for dementia care in acute settings and limited evidence for care bundles for dementia in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn O. Sullivan
- Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University College Cork, St Finbarr’s Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sarabia-Cobo CM, Pérez V, de Lorena P, Nuñez MJ, Domínguez E. Decisions at the end of life made by relatives of institutionalized patients with dementia. Appl Nurs Res 2016; 31:e6-e10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Revised: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 02/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
10
|
Saini G, Sampson EL, Davis S, Kupeli N, Harrington J, Leavey G, Nazareth I, Jones L, Moore KJ. An ethnographic study of strategies to support discussions with family members on end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia in nursing homes. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15:55. [PMID: 27388766 PMCID: PMC4936120 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most people with advanced dementia die in nursing homes where families may have to make decisions as death approaches. Discussions about end-of-life care between families and nursing home staff are uncommon, despite a range of potential benefits. In this study we aimed to examine practices relating to end-of-life discussions with family members of people with advanced dementia residing in nursing homes and to explore strategies for improving practice. METHODS An ethnographic study in two nursing homes where the Compassion Intervention was delivered. The Compassion Intervention provides a model of end-of-life care engaging an Interdisciplinary Care Leader to promote integrated care, educate staff, support holistic assessments and discuss end of life with families. We used a framework approach, undertaking a thematic analysis of fieldwork notes and observations recorded in a reflective diary kept by the Interdisciplinary Care Leader, and data from in-depth interviews with 23 informants: family members, GPs, nursing home staff, and external healthcare professionals. RESULTS Four major themes described strategies for improving practice: (i) educating families and staff about dementia progression and end-of-life care; (ii) appreciating the greater value of in-depth end-of-life discussions compared with simple documentation of care preferences; (iii) providing time and space for sensitive discussions; and (iv) having an independent healthcare professional or team with responsibility for end-of-life discussions. CONCLUSIONS The Interdisciplinary Care Leader role offers a promising method for supporting and improving end-of-life care discussions between families of people with advanced dementia and nursing home staff. These strategies warrant further evaluation in nursing home settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geena Saini
- Centre for Mental Health, Maya House, 134-138 Borough High Street, London, SE1 1LB, UK
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Jane Harrington
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Gerard Leavey
- Bamford Centre for Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Magee Campus, Northland Road, Derry Londonderry, BT48 7JL, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Royal Free Site, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Kirsten J Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department (MCPCRD), Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
van der Steen JT, Galway K, Carter G, Brazil K. Initiating advance care planning on end-of-life issues in dementia: Ambiguity among UK and Dutch physicians. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016; 65:225-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Kupeli N, Leavey G, Moore K, Harrington J, Lord K, King M, Nazareth I, Sampson EL, Jones L. Context, mechanisms and outcomes in end of life care for people with advanced dementia. BMC Palliat Care 2016; 15:31. [PMID: 26965309 PMCID: PMC4785626 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0103-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The majority of people with dementia in the UK die in care homes. The quality of end of life care in these environments is often suboptimal. The aim of the present study was to explore the context, mechanisms and outcomes for providing good palliative care to people with advanced dementia residing in UK care homes from the perspective of health and social care providers. Method The design of the study was qualitative which involved purposive sampling of health care professionals to undertake interactive interviews within a realist framework. Interviews were completed between September 2012 and October 2013 and were thematically analysed and then conceptualised according to context, mechanisms and outcomes. The settings were private care homes and services provided by the National Health Service including memory clinics, mental health and commissioning services in London, United Kingdom. The participants included 14 health and social care professionals including health care assistants, care home managers, commissioners for older adults’ services and nursing staff. Results Good palliative care for people with advanced dementia is underpinned by the prioritisation of psychosocial and spiritual care, developing relationships with family carers, addressing physical needs including symptom management and continuous, integrated care provided by a multidisciplinary team. Contextual factors that detract from good end of life care included: an emphasis on financial efficiency over person-centred care; a complex health and social care system, societal and family attitudes towards staff; staff training and experience, governance and bureaucratisation; complexity of dementia; advance care planning and staff characteristics. Mechanisms that influence the quality of end of life care include: level of health care professionals’ confidence, family uncertainty about end of life care, resources for improving end of life care and supporting families, and uncertainty about whether dementia specific palliative care is required. Conclusions Contextual factors regarding the care home environment may be obdurate and tend to negatively impact on the quality of end of life dementia care. Local level mechanisms may be more amenable to improvement. However, systemic changes to the care home environment are necessary to promote consistent, equitable and sustainable high quality end of life dementia care across the UK care home sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| | - Gerard Leavey
- Bamford Centre for Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK
| | - Kirsten Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Jane Harrington
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Londonderry, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Londonderry, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, Londonderry, UK
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.,Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust Liaison Psychiatry Team, St. Anns Hospital, London, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jones L, Candy B, Davis S, Elliott M, Gola A, Harrington J, Kupeli N, Lord K, Moore K, Scott S, Vickerstaff V, Omar RZ, King M, Leavey G, Nazareth I, Sampson EL. Development of a model for integrated care at the end of life in advanced dementia: A whole systems UK-wide approach. Palliat Med 2016; 30:279-95. [PMID: 26354388 PMCID: PMC4766969 DOI: 10.1177/0269216315605447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of dementia is rising worldwide and many people will die with the disease. Symptoms towards the end of life may be inadequately managed and informal and professional carers poorly supported. There are few evidence-based interventions to improve end-of-life care in advanced dementia. AIM To develop an integrated, whole systems, evidence-based intervention that is pragmatic and feasible to improve end-of-life care for people with advanced dementia and support those close to them. DESIGN A realist-based approach in which qualitative and quantitative data assisted the development of statements. These were incorporated into the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method to achieve consensus on intervention components. Components were mapped to underlying theory of whole systems change and the intervention described in a detailed manual. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Data were collected from people with dementia, carers and health and social care professionals in England, from expert opinion and existing literature. Professional stakeholders in all four countries of the United Kingdom contributed to the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method process. RESULTS A total of 29 statements were agreed and mapped to individual, group, organisational and economic/political levels of healthcare systems. The resulting main intervention components are as follows: (1) influencing local service organisation through facilitation of integrated multi-disciplinary care, (2) providing training and support for formal and informal carers and (3) influencing local healthcare commissioning and priorities of service providers. CONCLUSION Use of in-depth data, consensus methods and theoretical understanding of the intervention components produced an evidence-based intervention for further testing in end-of-life care in advanced dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Jones
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Bridget Candy
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Sarah Davis
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Margaret Elliott
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Anna Gola
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Jane Harrington
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Kirsten Moore
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Sharon Scott
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK St Christopher's Hospice, Sydenham, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Rumana Z Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Gerard Leavey
- The Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Well Being, University of Ulster, Londonderry, UK
| | - Irwin Nazareth
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), London, UK Barnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust Liaison Psychiatry Team, North Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|