One-year visual outcome of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery in high myopic eyes: retrospective cohort study

Femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis versus small-incision lenticule extraction: current approach based on evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laser keratorefractive surgery achieves excellent visual outcomes for refractive error correction. With femtosecond laser, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is an increasingly viable alternative to laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Comparative studies demonstrate similar efficacy and predictability between SMILE and LASIK, making it difficult for clinicians to choose which to use. This review thus compares femtosecond-LASIK (FS-LASK) and SMILE in various scenarios, to assist clinicians in deciding which refractive surgery procedure to recommend.

RECENT FINDINGS

SMILE may be superior for highly myopic eyes due to a smaller decrease in functional optical zone. SMILE further induces less spherical aberration and less overall higher order aberrations in mesopic conditions. SMIILE also has less postoperative dry eye, making it suitable those with preexisting dry eye. For low to moderate myopic astigmatism correction, FS-LASIK has less undercorrection compared to SMILE. Lastly, SMILE has not yet received Food and Drug Administration or Conformité Européenne approval for hyperopic correction, rendering FS-LASIK the choice of procedure for hyperopic correction.

SUMMARY

Both FS-LASIK and SMILE demonstrate good efficacy and predictability. Understanding specific clinical scenarios where one may be superior to the other will aid clinicians in choosing the most suitable procedure for personalized care.

The biomechanical proteins different between low myopic corneas and moderate to high myopic corneas in human

PURPOSE

To explore the biomechanical proteins different between low myopic corneas and moderate to high myopic corneas.

METHODS

A total of 27 myopic corneas were used for the Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) proteomics analysis. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were clustered with fold changes > 1.20 or < 0.83 and p < 0.05. Proteins and Proteins Interactions (PPIs) were conducted to find hub proteins; Uniprot database was to screen proteins with biomechanical functions, and Parallel Reaction Monitoring (PRM) was performed to verify the TMT results. Pearson analysis was used to reveal the correlations between myopic degrees and biomechanical proteins. The Immunofluorescence (IF) staining was used to observe the protein distributions.

RESULTS

In total, 34 DEPs were observed between moderate myopic corneas and low myopic corneas; 103 DEPs were observed between high myopic corneas and low myopic corneas, 20 proteins overlapped. The PPIs analysis showed keratin 2, keratins 10 and PRSS1 were hub proteins. The Uniprot function analysis suggested keratin 2 and keratin 10 exhibited biomechanical functions. The PRM demonstrated keratin 2 and keratin 10 levels were significantly lower in moderate and high myopic corneas, which was consistent with the TMT proteomics results. IF staining also demonstrated keratin 2 and keratin 10 were less distributed in moderate and high myopic corneas than in low myopic corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

The levels of biomechanical proteins keratin 2 and keratin 10 are significantly lower in moderate and high myopic corneas than in low myopic corneas.

Long-Term Visual Quality and Pupil Changes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Eyes without Preoperative Cylinder Refraction

Purpose

To investigate the long-term changes in visual quality and pupil size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for eyes without preoperative cylinder refraction.

Methods

Thirty-three myopic eyes (33 patients) without preoperative cylinder refraction were corrected using SMILE. Refractive outcomes, corneal curvature, aberrations, contrast sensitivity (CS), and pupil diameter were evaluated preoperatively, and 30 months postoperatively.

Results

The 30-month postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, LogMAR) were -0.10 ± 0.09 and -0.14 ± 0.06, respectively, whereas the preoperative CDVA (LogMAR) was -0.07 ± 0.05. Cylinder refraction of -0.11 ± 0.21 D (ranging from -0.50 to 0.00) was observed at 30 months postoperatively, increasing from the preoperative cylinder refraction of 0.00 ± 0.00 D (P=0.004). Moreover, the centroid coordinates x, y of corneal anterior astigmatic vectors were -0.19 ± 0.22, 0.81 ± 0.33 at 30 months postoperatively, and 0.02 ± 0.28, 0.76 ± 0.51 preoperatively (Px < 0.001 and Py=0.810, respectively). Furthermore, a 15° axis change in the mean anterior corneal astigmatic vector was observed at 30 months postoperatively from the preoperative state, as measured by Pentacam. At 30 months postoperatively, the photopic Log CS reduced significantly with glare at three and six cycles/degrees (P < 0.001 and P=0.015, respectively), a decreased photopic pupil diameter (3.27 ± 0.55 mm vs. 3.10 ± 0.66 mm, P=0.030), and an increased Coma (Z31) and Trefoil (Z3-3) at 4 mm diameter area analysis. However, a significant linear regression relationship was only observed between changes in photopic pupil diameter and changes in photopic Log CS with glare at 12 cycles/degree (P=0.038 and β = 0.282).

Conclusion

Slight cylinder regression was observed with thicker corneal lenticular extraction after SMILE correction of nonastigmatic eyes 30 months postoperatively. This regression was mainly because of the axis changes in anterior corneal astigmatism power. Therefore, a cylinder nomogram modification of 0.25 to 0.50 D is considerable for correcting nonastigmatic myopic eyes with a predicted spherical lenticular thickness over 100 µm.

Comparisons of the protein expressions between high myopia and moderate myopia on the anterior corneal stroma in human

PURPOSE

To investigate the differentially expressed proteins (DEP) between high myopia and moderate myopia on the anterior corneal stroma.

METHODS

Tandem mass tag (TMT) quantitative proteomics was utilized to reveal proteins. DEPs were screened by the multiple change of more than 1.2 times or less than 0.83 and the P value < 0.05. The DEPs were functional annotated by Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Proteins and protein interaction (PPI) networks were conducted with String online tool. Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) data processing was used to verify the TMT proteomics results.

RESULTS

There are 36 DEPs between high myopia and moderate myopia on the anterior corneal stroma, of which 11 proteins are upregulated, 25 proteins are downregulated. The GO analysis demonstrated keratinocyte migration and structural constituent of cytoskeleton that are significantly changed with most of the proteins decreased in high myopic corneas. Keratin 16 (KRT16) and erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like protein 4B are the only two proteins involved in both functions. The PPI analysis showed keratin type II cytoskeletal 6A (KRT6A) and KRT16 that have strong connections. Immunoglobulin lambda variable 8-61(IGLV8-61) and nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT) have consistent results with the TMT.

CONCLUSIONS

The high myopic corneas have 36 DEPs compared to the moderate myopic corneas on the anterior corneal stroma. Keratinocyte migrations and structural constituent of cytoskeleton are weakened in high myopic corneas, which may partly account for the lower corneal biomechanics in high myopic eyes. The lower expressed KRT16 plays important roles in high myopic corneas.

Corneal metabolic biomarkers for moderate and high myopia in human

This study aimed to identify the corneal metabolic biomarkers for moderate and high myopia in human. We enrolled 221 eyes from 221 subjects with myopia to perform the femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery. Among these, 71 eyes of 71 subjects were enrolled in the low myopic group, 75 eyes of 75 subjects in the moderate myopic group and 75 eyes of 75 subjects in the high myopic group. The untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed to analyze the corneal tissues extracted during the SMILE surgery using an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to identify the different metabolites among the three myopic groups, the orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) model was used to reveal the different metabolites between moderate myopia and low myopia, and between high myopia and low myopia. The Venn gram was used to find the overlapped metabolites of the three datasets of the different metabolites. The stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the metabolic molecules associated with manifest refractive spherical equivalents (MRSE). The Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to reveal the corneal biomarkers for moderate and high myopia. The hub biomarker was further selected by the networks among different metabolites created by the Cytoscape software. A total of 1594 metabolites were identified in myopic corneas. 321 metabolites were different among the three myopic groups, 106 metabolites were different between high myopic corneas and low myopic corneas, 104 metabolites were different between moderate myopic corneas and low myopic corneas, and 30 metabolic molecules overlapped among the three datasets. The multivariate linear regression analysis revealed the myopic degree was significantly influenced by the corneal levels of azelaic acid, arginine-proline (Arg-Pro), 1-stearoyl-2-myristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and hypoxanthine. The ROC curve analysis showed that azelaic acid, Arg-Pro and hypoxanthine were effective in discriminating low myopia from moderate to high myopia with the area under the curve (AUC) values as 0.982, 0.991 and 0.982 for azelaic acid, Arg-Pro and hypoxanthine respectively. The network analysis suggested that Arg-Pro had the maximum connections among these three biomarkers. Thus, this study identified azelaic acid, Arg-Pro and hypoxanthine as corneal biomarkers to discriminate low myopia from moderate to high myopia, with Arg-Pro serving as the hub biomarker for moderate and high myopia.

Relationship between postoperative residual refractive error and preoperative corneal stiffness in small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between postoperative residual refractive error and preoperative corneal stiffness after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

SETTING

Hospital clinic.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Corneal stiffness was evaluated using the stress-strain index (SSI). Associations between postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and corneal stiffness were determined using longitudinal regression analysis after adjustment for sex, age, preoperative SE, and other variables. The cohort was divided into halves to compare risk ratios for residual refraction in corneas with different SSI values. Low SSI values were defined as having less-stiff corneas and others as having stiffer corneas.

RESULTS

287 patients (287 eyes) were included. Greater undercorrection was found in less-stiff corneas across all follow-up timepoints (less-stiff corneas: 1 day: -0.36 ± 0.45 diopters [D], 1 month: -0.22 ± 0.36 D, and 3 months: -0.13 ± 0.15 D; stiffer corneas: -0.22 ± 0.37 D, -0.14 ± 0.35 D, and -0.05 ± 0.11 D, respectively). Postoperative refraction exhibited a mean 0.05 D undercorrection for every 0.1-unit decrease in the SSI after adjustment for variables. The SSI accounted for nearly 10% of the variance in refractive outcomes. Less-stiff corneas increased the risk ratio of postoperative absolute SE >0 D and ≥0.25 D by 2.242 (95% CI, 1.334-3.768) and 3.023 (95% CI, 1.466-6.233), respectively, compared with stiffer corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative residual refractive error was associated with preoperative corneal stiffness. Patients with less-stiff corneas had a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of residual refractive error after SMILE. Preoperative analysis of corneal stiffness can help modify nomogram algorithms of surgery and improve the predictability of refractive outcomes.

Carbodiimide crosslinked decellularized lenticules as a drug carrier for sustained antibacterial eye treatments

In this study, the drug-loading and antibacterial activity of carbodiimide/N-hydroxysuccinimide (EDC/NHS) crosslinked decellularized lenticules (CDLs) were evaluated. Small incision lenticule extraction derived lenticules were decellularized and modified with crosslinking concentrations of 0.00 (E/L00, non-crosslinked), 0.01 (E/L01), 0.05 (E/L05) and 0.25 mmol (E/L25) EDC per mg lenticules at 5:1 EDC/NHS ratios with non-decellularized non-crosslinked lenticules (NDLs) as controls. NDLs and EDC/NHS CDLs had similar water contents. The light transmittance percentages (400-800 nm) were 91.55 ± 1.16%, 88.68 ± 1.19%, 80.86 ± 1.94%, 85.12 ± 2.42% and 85.62 ± 2.84% for NDLs, E/L00, E/L01, E/L05 and E/L25, respectively (P< 0.01). The EDC/NHS CDLs (diameter: 6.36 ± 0.18 mm; central thickness: 117.31 ± 3.46 μm) were soaked in 3% (wt./vol.) levofloxacin (LEV) solution for 3 h. The drug release concentrations of LEV-impregnated EDC/NHS CDLs were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Zone inhibition (ZOI) againstStaphylococcus aureusof E/L01, E/L05 and E/L25 were superior to E/L00 CDLs (P< 0.01) and among the different crosslinked groups, E/L05 lenticules produced the largest ZOIs and their drug concentration release over 21 d was the highest. EDC/NHS crosslinking can improve the drug-loading effect and antibacterial activity of decellularized lenticules. LEV-impregnated EDC/NHS CDLs are promising drug delivery carriers.

One-Year Visual Outcomes and Corneal Higher-Order Aberration Assessment of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for the Treatment of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

We present a retrospective, single-center report of one-year visual outcomes for Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) to treat myopia and myopic astigmatism, as well as to compare outcomes with other published literature, including results from the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA). A total of 405 eyes with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent of -5.54 diopters (D) underwent SMILE between April 2017 and April 2022. The outcomes measured included visual acuity, manifest refraction, vector analysis, and wavefront aberrometry at various time points, specifically pre-operative and twelve months post-operatively. Results were compared to other similar published studies of SMILE outcomes between 2012 and 2021. A total of 308 and 213 eyes were evaluated at three and twelve months, respectively. At twelve months, 79% of eyes achieved UDVA ≥ 20/20, and 99% had ≥20/40, with no patients losing ≥2 lines of vision. For accuracy, 84% of eyes were within 0.5 D of target SEQ, and 97% were within 1 D. Total corneal higher order aberrations (HOA) increased from 0.33 to 0.61 um. Significant change was found in vertical coma and spherical aberration at twelve months. SMILE remains a safe and effective treatment for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Clinical outcomes are likely to improve with increased surgeon experience and refinement of technology and nomograms.

Ex-vivo study on the surface quality of corneal lenticule and stroma after low energy femtosecond laser lenticule extraction

This study aimed to assess the surface quality of cap, stroma and lenticular surfaces created using low-energy femtosecond laser lenticule extraction (Ziemer FEMTO LDV Z8). Twenty-four porcine eyes were divided into four groups (n = 6 each): two with optimal laser power (32%) with posterior curvature equivalent to a spherical correction of -2D and -5D, respectively and the other two with high power (64%) with spherical correction of -2D and -5D respectively. Samples were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Surface morphology was evaluated using a standard scoring system; surface relief, surface regularity, extent and position of irregularities were graded by four independent clinicians. Eyes with 32% power and -2D correction had significantly less size of the irregular area than those with -5D; however, no significant difference was found between the two groups with 64% power. When comparing eyes with -2D correction, the size of the irregular area was lesser with 32% power. Surface relief was lesser with -5D correction with 32% power than 64% power. Low-energy femtosecond laser lenticule extraction (Ziemer FEMTO LDV Z8) produces good surface quality results. There is a tendency for smoother surface stromal quality with lower power settings than a higher power.

Applying Information Gain to Explore Factors Affecting Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed to identify the key factors influencing postoperative refraction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using information gain.

Methods

This study comprised 2,350 eyes of 1,200 patients who underwent SMILE using a Visumax 500-kHz femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in three ophthalmic centers: Tianjin Eye Hospital (center A), Jinan Mingshui Eye Hospital (center B), and Qingdao Eye Hospital (center C). Anterior segment features, including corneal curvature and central corneal thickness (CCT), were obtained from Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). Information gain was calculated to analyze the importance of features affecting postoperative refraction.

Results

Preoperative and postoperative mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction were −5.00 (−6.13, −3.88) D and 0.00 (−0.25, 0.13) D, respectively. None of the patients lost more than two lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The safety index was 1.32 ± 0.24, 1.03 ± 0.08, and 1.13 ± 0.16 in centers A, B, and C, respectively. The efficacy index was 1.31 ± 0.25, 1.02 ± 0.08, and 1.13 ± 0.17 in centers A, B, and C, respectively. At least 95% of the eyes were within ±1.00 D of the attempted correction. Postoperative refraction was related to preoperative spherical diopter refraction (r = 0.369, p < 0.001), preoperative SE (r = 0.364, p < 0.001), maximum lenticule thickness (r = −0.311, p < 0.001), preoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (r = 0.164, p < 0.001), residual stromal thickness (r = 0.139, p < 0.001), preoperative mean anterior corneal curvature (r = −0.127, p < 0.001), preoperative flattest anterior corneal curvature (r = −0.122, p < 0.001), nomogram (r = −0.100, p < 0.001) and preoperative CCT (r = −0.058, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

SMILE was considered a safe and effective procedure for correcting myopia. Based on information gain, postoperative refraction was influenced by preoperative mean anterior corneal curvature, CCT, refraction, and residual stromal thickness.

Comparison of visual outcomes between 120-µm and 140-µm cap thicknesses 12 months after small incision lenticule extraction

To compare visual and refractive outcomes as well as changes in high-order aberrations in patients with 120- versus 140-µm cap thicknesses 12 months after small incision lenticule extraction. Ninety-four patients were randomized to receive small incision lenticule extraction with either a 120-µm cap thickness (n = 47) or a 140-µm cap thickness (n = 47) to treat myopia or myopic astigmatism, if not both. In an analysis of right eyes only during the 12-month follow-up period, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive outcomes, and high-order aberrations were evaluated. The distribution of patients by age and sex between the groups did not differ significantly (P = .803 and P = .680, respectively). CDVA, spherical and cylindrical refraction, and changes in total high-order aberration, spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil were similar between the groups at 6 and 12 months, postoperatively. However, UDVA was statistically significantly higher in patients with 140-μm cap thicknesses than with 120-μm cap thicknesses at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Patients with 140-µm cap thickness showed greater improvement in UDVA than ones with 120-µm cap thickness at 12-month follow-up (P = .005). Both 120- and 140-μm cap thicknesses in small incision lenticule extraction were safe and effective thicknesses for correcting myopia or myopic astigmatism. The patients with 140-μm cap thickness had better improvement in UDVA after 12-month follow-up compared to patients with 120-μm cap thickness.

One year outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

Purpose

To report the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction ReLEX (SMILE) technique using VisuMax femtosecond laser in myopia and myopic astigmatism patients.

Material and methods

A non-randomized clinical study has been conducted on patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent ReLEX SMILE technique, using the Zeiss VisuMax Laser system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at Oculens Clinic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Patients older than 18 years, with ocular astigmatism up to -5 diopters (D), spherical equivalent up to -10.00 D, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.3 or better before the surgery, stable refraction for one year, and with a minimum calculated post operator residual stromal bed of 250μ were included in the study.

Results

The study involved a total of 25 myopic eyes (median of sphere diopters equal with -4D) and 67 myopic astigmatic eyes (median of cylinder diopters equal with -1.5 D). The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) on patients with myopic eyes reduced from -4.25D (median) to -0.5D at one month follow-up, -0.25 D at 6 and 12 months. The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) on patients with astigmatic myopic eyes reduced from-6.25 D to -0.67 D at one month, -0.62 D at six and twelve months. The value of sphere decreased postoperatively on myopic eyes with a median of -0.25D at one, six and twelve months. The value of cylinder decreased postoperatively on myopic astigmatic eyes with a median of -0.50 D at one month, -0.25 D at six months and -0.50 D at 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, 20 (80.0%) of myopic eyes were maintained within ±0.5 D and 22 (88.0%) with ±1D. On both groups (myopic eyes and myopic astigmatic eyes), statistically significant differences were observed when the keratometric baseline values were compared to each follow-up (P-values < 0.0001), without any significant differences between follow-ups (P-values>0.15). At 1-month follow-up, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was better than or equal to 0.5 in 88.0% of myopic eyes and 82.1% of myopic astigmatic eyes. UDVA remained stable in all cases of myopic eyes at six months and the percentage increased at 92.0% in myopic eyes. UDVA slightly increased at 6-months (85.1%) and remained at the same value at 12-months in myopic astigmatism eyes.

Conclusions

SMILE proved an effective and safe refractive corneal procedure and provided a predictable and stable correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE technique demonstrated very good outcomes in terms of keratometric, cylinder, spherical measurements.

Bilateral Lenticule Creation Followed by Bilateral Lenticule Separation Improves Visual Outcomes After SMILE

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of different surgical sequences on the visual and refractive outcomes of bilateral small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

Participants who underwent uneventful SMILE between March 2018 and September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into two groups: Sequence A (laser scanning [LS] of the right eye, manual separation lenticule [MSL] of the right eye, and LS and MSL of the left eye) and Sequence B (LS of the right eye, LS of the left eye, MSL of the left eye, and MSL of the right eye). PSM was conducted to minimize the effect of confounding factors on postoperative visual outcomes at days 1 and 7 and months 1, 3, and 6. Safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,854 eyes of 927 participants were included (Sequence A, n = 280; Sequence B, n = 647). After PSM, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and 534 eyes (267 patients) in the Sequence A group were matched (1:1) to the Sequence B group. The postoperative corrected distance visual acuity significantly differed between groups at 3 months (adjusted P = .007). The uncorrected distance visual acuity significantly differed between groups at all follow-up visits (adjusted P < .01). The safety index (1.341 ± 0.265 and 1.413 ± 0.294) and efficacy index (1.173 ± 0.191 and 1.251 ± 0.269) were different in the Sequence A and Sequence B groups, respectively, at 3 months (adjusted P < .01). No difference in visual outcomes was found between right and left eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had bilateral lenticule creation followed by bilateral lenticule separation had better postoperative visual outcomes than those who underwent complete SMILE surgery in each eye separately. Regardless of the surgical sequence chosen for the SMILE procedure, there was no impact on outcomes between the right and left eyes. Adjusting the sequence of the surgical procedure may be a way to improve the visual results. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):726-733.].

Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a novel 1-step refractive procedure with femtosecond laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Although it has shown good clinical results in efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability, there are still some concerns. In this study, we review the published clinical outcomes of high myopia correction and exploration in hyperopia correction. Results have suggested that SMILE has acceptable outcomes in correction for high myopia <10.0 diopters (D), and it is a feasible and effective procedure for the treatment of hyperopia. However, it is unsuitable for the treatment of extremely high myopia because there is undercorrection and regression as existed in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and compound hyperopic astigmatism currently could not be corrected either. More technical and clinical improvements are required to make SMILE competitive.

Clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus advanced surface ablation in low myopia

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction and advanced surface ablation for low myopia or myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational case series of our first 50 consecutive small incision lenticule extraction patients compared to refraction-matched 50 advanced surface ablation treatments with attempted spherical equivalent correction ⩽-3.5 D, astigmatism ⩽-1.5 D, and corrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 (decimal scale) or better. Only one eye per patient was included.

RESULTS

Small incision lenticule extraction: mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was -2.80 ± 0.63 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.85 and 1.0 at days 1 and 5, respectively. At 3 months, mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.02 ± 0.32 D (range: -0.5 to +0.75 D), mean cylinder was -0.24 ± 0.21 D (range: 0 to -0.75 D), mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.27, mean efficacy index was 0.96, and mean safety index was 1.05. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was same or better than corrected distance visual acuity in 96%, astigmatism ⩽0.5 D in 98% and ⩽1 D in 100% of eyes, respectively. Advanced surface ablation: mean attempted spherical equivalent correction was -2.75 ± 0.5 D. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.72 and 0.61 at days 1 and 5, respectively. At 3 months, mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.22 ± 0.32 D, mean cylinder was -0.27 ± 0.27 D, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.21, mean efficacy index was 1.03, and mean safety index was 1.08.

CONCLUSION

Small incision lenticule extraction for low myopia was found to be safe and effective with outcomes at 3 months similar to those obtained with advanced surface ablation while offering a quicker visual recovery.

Small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE

Excimer laser-based refractive procedures can have less predictable results when used for correcting high myopia than when used for moderate myopia. Small incision lenticule extraction might overcome this weakness. However, small incision lenticule extraction is only Food and Drug Administration approved for use in myopic eyes up to -8 D with astigmatism of -3 D or less. We report outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction in highly and moderately myopic eyes and compare these to modern laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational consecutive case series. Inclusion criteria: attempted myopic spherical correction ⩾-8 or-3 to -7.75 D with astigmatism ⩽-3 D, and corrected distance visual acuity of 1.0 (decimal scale) or better.

RESULTS

A total of 62 highly myopic and 407 moderately myopic eyes were included. At 3 months postoperatively, the highly myopic eyes had a mean spherical equivalent refraction of -0.28 ± 0.41 D (range: -1.13 to +0.75 D). Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 1.0. Mean efficacy index was 0.84. Mean safety index was 1.03. Uncorrected distance visual acuity same or better than corrected distance visual acuity: 61%. Astigmatism was ⩽0.5 D in 90% and ⩽1 D in 100%. The results in the moderately myopic eyes were comparable.

CONCLUSION

We found equally good visual and refractive outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of high and of moderate myopia combined with an astigmatic correction of up to 3 D, respectively.

15-Month Visual Outcomes and Corneal Power Changes of SMILE in Treating High Myopia With Maximum Myopic Meridian Exceeding 10.00 D

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term visual and refractive outcomes, optical quality, and stability of the cornea and axial length after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high myopia with a maximum myopic meridian exceeding 10.00 diopters (D).

METHODS

Via a prospective cohort study, 53 eyes (53 patients) with a maximum myopic meridian exceeding 10.00 D were corrected with a VisuMax femtosecond laser (version 3.0; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University. Refractive outcomes, aberrations, axial length, and corneal curvature were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 15 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 15 months postoperatively, the efficacy and safety indexes were 0.91 ± 0.25 and 1.15 ± 0.18, respectively. A total of 72% of eyes were within ±0.50 D and 89% were within ±1.00 D of the attempted spherical equivalent, respectively. From 1 to 15 months postoperatively, the significant regression was -0.24 ± 0.28 D (P < .001) on manifest refraction and -0.43 ± 0.54 D (P < .001) on anterior corneal curvature. In addition, a significant increase of 0.20 µm (P = .016) was observed in the spherical aberration. No significant change was observed in posterior corneal curvature (P > .999), including mean keratometry or astigmatism, or in the ocular axis length from 1 to 15 months postoperatively (26.82 ± 0.93 and 26.82 ± 0.95 mm, respectively, P > .99).

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE had long-term safety, efficacy, and predictability when treating high myopia with a maximum myopic meridian exceeding 10.00 D. Both a manifest refraction regression of -0.24 D and a significant spherical aberration increase of 0.20 µm were observed between 1 and 15 months postoperatively, due to the increased anterior corneal curvature. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(1):31-39.].

Aborted small-incision lenticule extraction resulting from false plane creation and strategy for subsequent removal based on corneal layered pachymetry imaging

We describe a complication of false plane creation during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the surgical plan for subsequent lenticule removal. During a primary SMILE procedure to treat high myopia, the separator instrument entered a false lamellar plane as a result of an area of resistance caused by an area of opaque bubble layer (OBL). The procedure was aborted to avoid removing an irregular lenticule. Based on measurements of the anatomic landscape, a new inferonasal small incision was created. The lenticule was separated and removed without further incidence. The patient recovered as normal and at 6 months, the uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/16^-1. This case highlights the importance of monitoring the bubble layer creation and interface separation to avoid creating or removing an irregular lenticule. It also shows the importance of layered corneal imaging to analyze and diagnose complications as well as of aborting a procedure and planning lenticule removal at a later time if deemed appropriate.

Predicting Refractive Outcome of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Using Corneal Properties

Purpose

To investigate whether preoperative corneal topographic and biomechanical parameters (CTBPs) predict postoperative residual refractive error (RRE).

Methods

We retrospectively included 151 eyes from 151 patients of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with target RRE of plano and 3-month measurements of refractive error from Tianjin Eye Hospital. Multivariate linear/logistic regressions were performed to associate age, gender, preoperative refractive error, lenticule thickness, and CTBPs with postoperative RRE/the occurrence of myopic RRE ≤ −0.25 diopter (D). Stepwise regression was used for feature selection. Leave-one-cross-validation was used for model evaluation by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

From linear regression, more myopic RRE was associated with higher preoperative myopia, intraocular pressure (IOP), flattest curvature of anterior cornea (AC), and highest concavity deformation (HCD), and was associated with lower anterior elevation, anterior asphericity, steepest curvature of AC, and second applanation velocity. The occurrence of ≤ −0.25 D RRE was associated with higher myopia, IOP, posterior elevation and asphericity, flattest curvature of AC, first applanation velocity and HCD, and was associated with lower first applanation stiffness parameter, central corneal thickness, anterior elevation and asphericity, steepest curvature of AC, and second applanation velocity as well as thinner lenticule thickness. Compared to the baseline model using age, gender, and preoperative refractive error, adding CTBPs significantly (P < 0.001) improved the AUC performance to 0.771 from 0.615.

Conclusions

Postoperative outcomes of SMILE can be predicted by individual CTBPs.

Translational Relevance

Our findings could be used to customize a refractive nomogram based on individual corneal properties improving outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Enhancement of refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction via tear-film control

PURPOSE

To suggest that tear film is a refractive outcome predictor in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia and describe methods of controlling the tear film and its effects on refractive outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, the tear film was kept clear and appropriate in amount during tear-film-controlled SMILE (TFC-SMILE). In contrast, no special care to the tear film was given in direct-docking SMILE (DD-SMILE). Both procedures were performed by the same experienced surgeon, using the same surgical parameters, over defined periods. In select cases, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the lenticule and surgical videos of opaque bubble layers (OBLs) were obtained and compared.

RESULTS

Forty-one eyes had DD-SMILE and 55 eyes had TFC-SMILE. Multivariate analysis showed that TFC-SMILE and the patient's age were significant predictors of refractive outcomes. The refractive predictability of TFC-SMILE was better than that of DD-SMILE, and under-correction of high myopia was evident in the latter patients. The predictive errors of DD-SMILE became more myopic and variable during 1 year than those of TFC-SMILE. The lenticular surface on SEM was more serrated in DD-SMILE. Severe OBLs were evident in four cases of DD-SMILE and the OBL pattern was sporadic at the anterior surface of the lenticule.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a clear and appropriate tear film in SMILE enhanced predictability, minimized variability, and ensured stability of refractive outcomes. An uncontrolled tear film might render cutting imprecise and trigger severe OBL formation. TFC-SMILE had more predictable results than DD-SMILE.

Initial Single-Site Surgical Experience with SMILE: A Comparison of Results to FDA SMILE, and the Earliest and Latest Generation of LASIK

Introduction

The primary objective was to show our initial surgical single-site experience with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) after the official enrollment in March 2017 following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for simple myopia in late 2016 in the United States and, subsequently, compare our results to the earliest and most advanced generation of excimer platforms for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.

Methods

This was a retrospective single-site study of 68 eyes from 35 patients who had SMILE surgery. The patients’ preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest sphere, manifest cylinder, intraoperative complications, and preoperative and postoperative visual symptoms were collected. We compared our findings to the results from the FDA SMILE study, and to the three earliest (1999–2000) and three of the most updated (2013–2016) platforms for LASIK.

Results

The cumulative UDVA was 20/20 and 20/40 or better in 74% and 100% of patients, respectively. The intended target refraction was within ± 0.5 and ± 1.00 D in 80% and 93% of cases, respectively. The prevalence of dry eyes decreased by nearly half from 1-week to the 6-month postoperative interval. Patients noted improvement in glare (17%), halos (17%), fluctuation (25%), and depth perception (8%) at the 6-month interval compared to preoperative levels.

Conclusions

This study’s findings are consistent with current SMILE reports. Notably, the results are superior to the earliest generation of LASIK, however inferior to the latest excimer platforms. SMILE does meet the efficacy and safety criteria met by FDA; however, there is a definite need for further improvement to reach the superior refractive outcomes produced by the latest generation of LASIK platforms.

Refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction: A new refractive surgery paradigm

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), a variant of refractive lenticule extraction technology is becoming increasingly popular, as a flapless and minimally invasive form of laser vision correction (LVC) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. This review aims at summarizing the principles, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes in terms of visual and refractive results, safety, efficacy, postoperative dry eye, aberrations, and biomechanics of SMILE and its comparison with other conventional techniques of LVC, such as laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Recent advancements in the laser frequency and energy delivery patterns, instrumentation, and surgical techniques have shown significant improvement in the visual recovery and outcomes after SMILE, compared to the initial results published by Sekundo and Shah et al. Most of the recently published literature on long-term outcomes of SMILE shows excellent stability of the procedure, especially for higher myopia. In terms of the postoperative dry eye, SMILE shows a clear advantage over LASIK as numerous studies have shown significant differences about the Schirmer's, Tear film break up time, corneal sensitivity, and corneal nerve regeneration to be better following SMILE compared to LASIK. There is some evidence that since the Bowman's membrane (BM) and the anterior lamellae remain intact after SMILE, this may be a potential advantage for corneal biomechanics over LASIK and PRK where the BM is either severed or ablated, respectively, however, the data on biomechanics are inconclusive at present. Overall, this procedure has proved to be promising, delivering equivalent, or better visual and refractive results to LASIK and providing clear advantage in terms of being a flapless, minimally invasive procedure with minimal pain and postoperative discomfort thus offering high patient satisfaction.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: First 24-Hour Outcomes

Purpose

To observe the first 24-hour (h) outcomes of the small incision lenticule extraction procedure (SMILE) for myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Methods

Fifty-three eyes (27 patients) scheduled for SMILE were followed immediately (0 h), 2, 4, 6, and 24 h after SMILE. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), conjunctival congestion, pain level, and corneal edema, thickness, and densitometry were recorded.

Results

At 2 h after SMILE, 15.1% of eyes had ≤0.1 LogMAR UCVA; this increased to 62.3%, 98.1%, and 100% at 4, 6, and 24 h, respectively. Some eyes (33.96%) had mild corneal edema immediately after surgery. No 6 h postoperative edema was observed. In the first 24 h after SMILE, corneal thickness gradually decreased. Postoperative corneal densitometry values were significantly higher than preoperative values but gradually decreased during the first postoperative 24 h.

Conclusions

In the first postoperative 24 h, UCVA and corneal status (edema and densitometry) improved quickly.