1
|
Friedman DJ, Al-Khatib SM, Dalgaard F, Fudim M, Abraham WT, Cleland JGF, Curtis AB, Gold MR, Kutyifa V, Linde C, Tang AS, Ali-Ahmed F, Olivas-Martinez A, Inoue LY, Sanders GD. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circulation 2023; 147:812-823. [PMID: 36700426 PMCID: PMC10243743 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.122.062124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies by QRS characteristics; individual randomized trials are underpowered to assess benefit for relatively small subgroups. METHODS The authors analyzed patient-level data from pivotal CRT trials (MIRACLE [Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation], MIRACLE-ICD [Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation], MIRACLE-ICD II [Multicenter InSync ICD Randomized Clinical Evaluation II], REVERSE [Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction], RAFT [Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure], BLOCK-HF [Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block], COMPANION [Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure], and MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial - Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]) using Bayesian Hierarchical Weibull survival regression models to assess CRT benefit by QRS morphology (left bundle branch block [LBBB], n=4549; right bundle branch block [RBBB], n=691; and intraventricular conduction delay [IVCD], n=1024) and duration (with 150-ms partition). The continuous relationship between QRS duration and CRT benefit was also examined within subgroups defined by QRS morphology. The primary end point was time to heart failure hospitalization (HFH) or death; a secondary end point was time to all-cause death. RESULTS Of 6264 patients included, 25% were women, the median age was 66 [interquartile range, 58 to 73] years, and 61% received CRT (with or without an implantable cardioverter defibrillator). CRT was associated with an overall lower risk of HFH or death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [credible interval (CrI), 0.65 to 0.84]), and in subgroups of patients with QRS ≥150 ms and either LBBB (HR, 0.56 [CrI, 0.48 to 0.66]) or IVCD (HR, 0.59 [CrI, 0.39 to 0.89]), but not RBBB (HR 0.97 [CrI, 0.68 to 1.34]; Pinteraction <0.001). No significant association for CRT with HFH or death was observed when QRS was <150 ms (regardless of QRS morphology) or in the presence of RBBB. Similar relationships were observed for all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS CRT is associated with reduced HFH or death in patients with QRS ≥150 ms and LBBB or IVCD, but not for those with RBBB. Aggregating RBBB and IVCD into a single "non-LBBB" category when selecting patients for CRT should be reconsidered. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00271154, NCT00251251, NCT00267098, and NCT00180271.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J. Friedman
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Sana M. Al-Khatib
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Frederik Dalgaard
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Medicine, Nykøbing Falster Sygehus, Nykøbing, Denmark
| | - Marat Fudim
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - William T. Abraham
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - John G. F. Cleland
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, London, UK and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence. School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow. UK
| | | | | | - Valentina Kutyifa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY
| | - Cecilia Linde
- Karolinska Institutet and Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Fatima Ali-Ahmed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Gillian D. Sanders
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Evidence Synthesis Group, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Strik M, Ploux S, Bordachar P. What Body Surface Mapping Has Taught Us About Ventricular Conduction Disease Implications for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and His Bundle Pacing. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2022; 14:213-221. [PMID: 35715079 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccep.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The degree and pattern of conduction disease seem determinant when assessing potential cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates. In the present review, the authors discuss the available noninvasive techniques that can be used to acquire ventricular activation time maps. They describe what body surface mapping has taught us about left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction delay, and right ventricular pacing and discuss the ability of derived parameters of electrical dyssynchrony to predict long-term clinical response to CRT or His bundle pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Strik
- Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Avenue de Magellan, Pessac F-33600, France; IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France.
| | - Sylvain Ploux
- Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Avenue de Magellan, Pessac F-33600, France; IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France
| | - Pierre Bordachar
- Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Avenue de Magellan, Pessac F-33600, France; IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardiac Resynchronization Defibrillator Therapy for Nonspecific Intraventricular Conduction Delay Versus Right Bundle Branch Block. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 73:3082-3099. [PMID: 31221257 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) conduction abnormality have not been fully explored. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate clinical outcomes among Medicare-aged patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (NICD) versus right bundle branch block (RBBB) in patients eligible for implantation with a CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D). METHODS Using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) registry data between 2010 and 2013, the authors compared outcomes in CRT-eligible patients implanted with CRT-D versus ICD-only therapy among patients with NICD and RBBB. Also, among all CRT-D-implanted patients, the authors compared outcomes in those with NICD versus RBBB. Survival curves and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess outcomes including hospitalization and death. RESULTS In 11,505 non-LBBB CRT-eligible patients, after multivariable adjustment, among patients with RBBB, CRT-D was not associated with better outcomes, compared with ICD alone, regardless of QRS duration. Among patients with NICD and a QRS ≥150 ms, CRT-D was associated with decreased mortality at 3 years compared with ICD alone (HR: 0.602; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.416 to 0.871; p = 0.0071). Among 5,954 CRT-D-implanted patients, after multivariable adjustment NICD compared with RBBB was associated with lower mortality at 3 years in those with a QRS duration of ≥150 ms (HR: 0.757; 95% CI: 0.625 to 0.917; p = 0.0044). CONCLUSIONS Among non-LBBB CRT-D-eligible patients, CRT-D implantation was associated with better outcomes compared with ICD alone specifically in NICD patients with a QRS duration of ≥150 ms. Careful patient selection should be considered for CRT-D implantation in patients with non-LBBB conduction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Despite improved understanding of heart failure (HF) and advances in medical treatments, its prevalence continues to rise, and the role of implantable devices continues to evolve. While cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an accepted form of treatment for many suffering from HF, there is an ever-evolving body of evidence examining novel indications, optimization of lead placement and device programming, with several competing technologies now also on the horizon. This review aims to take a clinical perspective on the major trials, current indications, controversies and emerging aspects of CRT in the treatment of HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aleksandr Voskoboinik
- Alfred Heart Centre, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia - .,Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Cardiology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|