Discrepancies in drug histories at admission to gastrointestinal surgery, internal medicine and geriatric hospital wards in Central Norway: a cross-sectional study

Effect of educational intervention on medication reconciliation practice of hospital pharmacists in a developing country - A non-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Medication reconciliation is an evidence-based practice that reduces medication-related harm to patients. This study evaluated the effect of educational intervention on medication reconciliation practice of pharmacists among ambulatory diabetes and hypertensive patients.

METHODS

A non-randomized clinical trial on medication reconciliation practice was carried out among 85 and 61 pharmacists at the intervention site and control site, respectively. Medication reconciliation was carried out among 334 (intervention-183; control-151) diabetes and/or hypertensive patients by the principal investigator to indirectly evaluate pharmacists' baseline medication reconciliation practice at both sites. A general educational intervention was carried out among intervention pharmacists. Medication reconciliation was carried out by the principal investigator among another cohort of 96 (intervention-46; control-50) and 90 (intervention-44; control-46) patients at three and six months postintervention, respectively, to indirectly assess pharmacists' postintervention medication reconciliation practice. Thereafter, a focused educational intervention was carried out among 15 of the intervention pharmacists. Three experts in clinical pharmacy analysed the medication reconciliation form filled by the 15 pharmacists after carrying out medication reconciliation on another cohort of 140 patients, after the focused intervention. Data was summarized with descriptive (frequency, percentage, mean ± standard deviation) and inferential (Pearson product-moment correlations analysis, independent-samples t-test and one-way ANOVA) statistics with level of significance set at p<0.05.

KEY FINDINGS

Baseline medication reconciliation practice was poor at both sites. Post-general educational intervention, medication discrepancy was significantly reduced by 42.8% at the intervention site (p<0.001). At the intervention site, a significant increase of 54.3% was observed in patients bringing their medication packs for clinic appointments making medication reconciliation easier (p=0.003), at 6-months postintervention. Thirty-five, 66 and 48 drug therapy problems were detected by 31 (43.1%), 33 (66.0%) and 32 (71.1%) intervention pharmacists at 1-, 3- and 6-month post-general educational intervention, respectively. Post-focused educational intervention, out of a total of 695 medications prescribed, 75 (10.8%) medication discrepancies were detected and resolved among 42 (30%) patients by the 15 pharmacists.

CONCLUSIONS

The educational interventions improved pharmacists' medication reconciliation practice at the intervention site. It is expected that this research would help create awareness on medication reconciliation among pharmacists in developing countries, with a view to reducing medication-related patient harm.

Extended Pharmacist Assessment of Medication Safety for Nursing Home Residents—A Cross-Sectional and Prospective Study

In the routine pharmacist’s medication review in ambulatory care and nursing homes in Germany, clinical diagnoses are often insufficiently considered as they are frequently not accessible to pharmacists and their electronic support tools. This may leave a significant proportion of medication-related problems (MRP) undetected and unresolved. Moreover, limited and incomplete data may promote spurious alerts of low clinical relevance. In order to assess the impact of improved data availability, we conducted a study (German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00025346) to evaluate the impact of an extended pharmacist’s medication review, made possible by diagnosis data being routinely available to the pharmacist. At six nursing homes in the Nuremberg metropolitan area, 338 patients treated by 32 physicians were enrolled. A pharmacist’s medication review, considering only the medication data, identified 114 potential MRPs, and additional consideration of diagnoses further identified 69 potential MRPs. The physicians adapted the therapy in response to 69.9% of alerts. The observed gain in MRP identified indicates that efforts should be intensified to facilitate and improve consideration of drug–diagnosis-related MRP by improving data sharing and communication between pharmacists and physicians caring for nursing home residents.

Impact of Pharmacist-Directed Medication Reconciliation in Reducing Medication Discrepancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

In hospital surgical wards, patients are at higher risk for medication errors, in part because physicians may not consider themselves sufficiently trained to prescribe medications. Hence, collaborative teamwork involving the pharmacist is needed.

Objectives

To assess the impact of medication reconciliation directed by pharmacists on decreasing medication discrepancies after discharge from the surgical ward.

Methods

Patients admitted to the surgical unit at a tertiary teaching hospital in Amman, Jordan, between July 2017 and July 2018 were selected and randomly assigned to either the control or the intervention group. Upon admission, the number and kinds of unintentional medication discrepancies were determined for both groups. Medication reconciliation was then provided to patients in the intervention group. The number of unintentional discrepancies was re-evaluated upon discharge for both groups. To assess differences between the control and intervention groups, the χ² or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables and an independent-sample t test for continuous data. A paired t test was conducted to determine whether the number of medication discrepancies was reduced as a result of pharmacists' recommendations.

Results

A total of 123 patients met the inclusion criteria, 61 in the intervention group and 62 in the control group. Discrepancies of omission and wrong dose constituted 41 (77%) of the 53 discrepancies in the intervention group and 25 (76%) of the 33 discrepancies in the control group. The number of unintentional discrepancies was significantly reduced from admission to discharge in both the intervention group (p = 0.002) and the control group (p = 0.007). Of 53 recommendations made by pharmacists, 20 (38%) were accepted by the treating physician, and all of these discrepancies were resolved.

Conclusions

This study sheds light on the existence of unintentional medication discrepancies upon admission for surgical patients, which may expose the patients to potential harm upon discharge from hospital. Additional studies with a larger sample size are needed to gain further insights on pharmacists' role in implementing medication reconciliation for surgical patients.

Evaluation of the medication reconciliation process and classification of discrepancies at hospital admission and discharge in Italy

Background Medication errors at different transitions of care are common and potentially harmful. Medication reconciliation process should be evaluated to reduce the unintentional discrepancies. Objective This study aims to identify and classify unintentional medication discrepancies at hospital admission and discharge and associated risk factors. Setting Two general internal medicine and a pulmonology wards of an Italian non-academic hospital. Method A retrospective observational study was conducted among adult patients admitted to the wards. In order to evaluate the current medication reconciliation process of these wards, the frequency and type of unintentional chronic medication discrepancies between the physician assessment of home medication and hospital admission and discharge prescriptions were studied. Patients' characteristic associated with the presence of at least one unintentional discrepancy were evaluated. Main outcome measure Frequencies of unintentional medication discrepancies upon admission and discharge and associated patients' characteristics. Results Among the 144 patients enrolled in the study, 53 and 64 unintentional medication discrepancies were identified at hospital admission and at discharge, respectively. Both at admission and discharge a quarter of patients had at least one unintentional discrepancy. 'Medication omission' was the most frequent type of discrepancy identified and respiratory system and nervous system were the classes of medication with the highest rate of unintentional discrepancies. Unintentional discrepancies were more likely to occur in patients receiving more medicine pre-admission, longer hospitalization stays and coming from or discharged to a nursing home. Conclusion Transitions of care are critical moments for patient safety in terms of unintentional medication discrepancies and a more structured medication reconciliation process is needed. The medication reconciliation process should be considered in terms of a multidisciplinary approach involving all health professionals as well as patients and caregivers directly.

Value of pharmacy services in an outpatient, preoperative, anesthesia clinic

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study assessed the expansion of pharmacy services to a preoperative, anesthesia clinic.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center.

PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

Medication histories were routinely obtained by clinic nurses, and pharmacy services were not available.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

A prospective, single-center, pilot study enrolled English-speaking patients aged 65 years or older in a preoperative clinic before a scheduled surgery. Patient attributes including health literacy and preparatory activities were measured using verbal and written questionnaires. Home medication lists were obtained by both clinic nurses (routine care) and a pharmacist (research), and the 2 lists were compared to identify medication discrepancies for each patient. Discrepancies were categorized by type and severity.

EVALUATION

This study evaluated the potential impact of medication histories obtained by pharmacists compared with those obtained by clinic nurses during geriatric preoperative clinic visits.

RESULTS

Of the 44 patients who gave their consent and were included in this pilot study, 25% (n = 11) had limited/marginal written and verbal health literacy, and 20% (n = 9) had limited/marginal numerical health literacy. Of the 38 patients who completed the pharmacist medication history interview, only 21% (n = 8) brought a complete list of their current medications to the preoperative clinic, 95% (n = 36) had at least 1 medication discrepancy, and 61% (n = 23) had at least 1 clinically meaningful discrepancy. Clinically meaningful discrepancies were identified for 8% (35 of 459) of medications and occurred most commonly for blood pressure medications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and beta blockers.

CONCLUSION

In this study, medication history discrepancies identified by pharmacists suggest that the expansion of pharmacy services into the preoperative clinic is feasible and could potentially prevent meaningful medication errors among geriatric patients being admitted for a scheduled surgery.