1
|
Holloway A, Guthrie V, Waller G, Smith J, Boyd J, Mercado S, Smith P, Stenhouse R, Sheikh A, Parker RA, Stoddart A, Conaglen P, Coulton S, Stadler G, Hunt K, Bray J, Ferguson J, Sondhi A, Lynch K, Rees J, Newbury-Birch D. A two-arm parallel-group individually randomised prison pilot study of a male remand alcohol intervention for self-efficacy enhancement: the APPRAISE study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e040636. [PMID: 33811049 PMCID: PMC8023744 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of at-risk drinking is far higher among those in contact with the criminal justice system (73%) than the general population (35%). However, there is little evidence on the effectiveness of alcohol brief interventions (ABIs) in reducing risky drinking among those in the criminal justice system, including the prison system and, in particular, those on remand. Building on earlier work, A two-arm parallel group individually randomised Prison Pilot study of a male Remand Alcohol Intervention for Self-efficacy Enhancement (APPRAISE) is a pilot study designed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an ABI, delivered to male prisoners on remand. The findings of APPRAISE should provide the information required to design a future definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS AND ANALYSIS APPRAISE will use mixed methods, with two linked phases, across two prisons in the UK, recruiting 180 adult men on remand: 90 from Scotland and 90 from England. Phase I will involve a two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised pilot study. The pilot evaluation will provide data on the likely impact of A two-arm parallel group individually randomised Prison Pilot study of a male Remand Alcohol Intervention for Self-efficacy Enhancement (APPRAISE), which will be used to inform a future definitive multicentre RCT. Phase II will be a process evaluation assessing how the ABI has been implemented to explore the change mechanisms underpinning the ABI (figure 1) and to assess the context within which the ABI is delivered. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The APPRAISE protocol has been approved by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (19/ES/0068), National Offender Management System (2019-240), Health Board Research and Development (2019/0268), Scottish Prison Service research and ethics committee, and by the University of Edinburgh's internal ethics department. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publications, presentations at local, national and international conferences, infographics and shared with relevant stakeholders through meetings and events. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN27417180.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha Holloway
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Victoria Guthrie
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gillian Waller
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jamie Smith
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute for Gender Medicine, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joanne Boyd
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- Centre for Change, County Durham Drug and Alcohol Recovery Service, Durham, UK
| | - Sharon Mercado
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Pam Smith
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rosie Stenhouse
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Andrew Stoddart
- Edinburgh Health Services Research Unit, The University Of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Gertraud Stadler
- Institute for Gender Medicine, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Kate Hunt
- Institute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Jeremy Bray
- Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensborough, UK
| | - Jennifer Ferguson
- School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Kieran Lynch
- Criminal Justice, Alcohol, Drugs and Tobacco Division, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Jessica Rees
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Newbury-Birch D, Ferguson J, Landale S, Giles EL, McGeechan GJ, Gill C, Stockdale KJ, Holloway A. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Alcohol Interventions for Incarcerated People. Alcohol Alcohol 2018; 53:412-425. [PMID: 29750413 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agy032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim The aim of this current study was to systematically review the literature on brief alcohol interventions for incarcerated individuals to ascertain the efficacy or effectiveness in making changes to either consumption of alcohol or other social outcomes. Short summary Levels of risky drinking and dependency are high amongst incarcerated individuals. Eleven studies from nine articles were included in the systematic review. Six of the studies included brief intervention and three extended interventions. Interventions have the potential to positively impact on risky drinking. More studies are needed in this setting. Introduction It has been shown that around three times as many incarcerated individuals are risky drinkers and alcohol dependency is ten times higher than in the general population. Methods Systematic review of randomised controlled trials or matched group trials of the efficacy of psychosocial alcohol interventions for incarcerated individuals: we searched seven databases, with no restrictions on language, year or location from inception through to August 2017. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist was used to ascertain intervention descriptions. Results Nine studies from 11 papers were included in the analysis. Six of the studies included brief interventions and three extended interventions. Every study used a different measure of alcohol consumption. Three of the studies that looked at brief interventions and all of the three extended intervention studies found significant reductions in relation to alcohol outcomes. Conclusions Results show that interventions in the prison setting have the potential to positively impact on alcohol use; however, because of small numbers and the use of different outcome measures we could not conduct a meta-analysis or generalise findings. Future studies are needed to standardise approaches to ensure greater rigour and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Ferguson
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Sarah Landale
- School of Health in Social Science, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Emma L Giles
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Grant J McGeechan
- School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Charlotte Gill
- Department of Criminology, Law and Society, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Kelly J Stockdale
- School of Psychological and Social Sciences, York St Johns University, York, UK
| | - Aisha Holloway
- School of Health in Social Science, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shorter GW, Heather N, Bray JW, Giles EL, Holloway A, Barbosa C, Berman AH, O'Donnell AJ, Clarke M, Stockdale KJ, Newbury-Birch D. The 'Outcome Reporting in Brief Intervention Trials: Alcohol' (ORBITAL) framework: protocol to determine a core outcome set for efficacy and effectiveness trials of alcohol screening and brief intervention. Trials 2017; 18:611. [PMID: 29273070 PMCID: PMC5741954 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-2335-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence base to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of alcohol brief interventions (ABI) is weakened by variation in the outcomes measured and by inconsistent reporting. The ‘Outcome Reporting in Brief Intervention Trials: Alcohol’ (ORBITAL) project aims to develop a core outcome set (COS) and reporting guidance for its use in future trials of ABI in a range of settings. Methods/design An international Special Interest Group was convened through INEBRIA (International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drugs) to inform the development of a COS for trials of ABI. ORBITAL will incorporate a systematic review to map outcomes used in efficacy and effectiveness trials of ABI and their measurement properties, using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. This will support a multi-round Delphi study to prioritise outcomes. Delphi panellists will be drawn from a range of settings and stakeholder groups, and the Delphi study will also be used to determine if a single COS is relevant for all settings. A consensus meeting with key stakeholder representation will determine the final COS and associated guidance for its use in trials of ABI. Discussion ORBITAL will develop a COS for alcohol screening and brief intervention trials, with outcomes stratified into domains and guidance on outcome measurement instruments. The standardisation of ABI outcomes and their measurement will support the ongoing development of ABI studies and a systematic synthesis of emerging research findings. We will track the extent to which the COS delivers on this promise through an exploration of the use of the guidance in the decade following COS publication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G W Shorter
- Alcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.,Psychotraumatology, Mental Health & Suicidal Behaviour Research Group, Psychology Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK.,Inspire, Belfast, UK.,College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - N Heather
- Faculty of Health and Life Science, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jeremy W Bray
- Department of Economics, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
| | - E L Giles
- Alcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - A Holloway
- School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Barbosa
- Behavioral Health Economics Program, RTI International, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A H Berman
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A J O'Donnell
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Clarke
- Northern Ireland Methodology Hub, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - K J Stockdale
- Alcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.,School of Psychological and Social Sciences, York St. John University, York, UK
| | - D Newbury-Birch
- Alcohol and Public Health Research Team, School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bartoli C, Berland-Benhaim C, Tuchtan-Torrents L, Kintz P, Leonetti G, Pelissier-Alicot AL. Suicide by Medication Overdose in Prison: A Study of Three Cases. J Forensic Sci 2017; 63:1316-1320. [DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Bartoli
- CNRS; EFS; ADES; Aix Marseille Univ; Marseille France
- Service de Médecine Légale; APHM, CHU Timone; Marseille France
| | | | - Lucile Tuchtan-Torrents
- CNRS; EFS; ADES; Aix Marseille Univ; Marseille France
- Service de Médecine Légale; APHM, CHU Timone; Marseille France
| | - Pascal Kintz
- X-Pertise Consulting; 84 route de Saverne 67205 Oberhausbergen France
- IML; Strasbourg France
| | - Georges Leonetti
- CNRS; EFS; ADES; Aix Marseille Univ; Marseille France
- Service de Médecine Légale; APHM, CHU Timone; Marseille France
| | - Anne-Laure Pelissier-Alicot
- Service de Médecine Légale; APHM, CHU Timone; Marseille France
- INSERM; INMED; 1 Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, EFS, ADES; Marseille France
| |
Collapse
|