1
|
Quach JL, Deery B, Kern M, Clinton J, Gold L, Orsini F, Sciberras E. Can a teacher-led mindfulness intervention for new school entrants improve child outcomes? Protocol for a school cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036523. [PMID: 32393614 PMCID: PMC7223282 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The first years of school are critical in establishing a foundation for positive long-term academic, social and well-being outcomes. Mindfulness-based interventions may help students transition well into school, but few robust studies have been conducted in this age group. We aim to determine whether compared with controls, children who receive a mindfulness intervention within the first years of primary school have better: (1) immediate attention/short-term memory at 18 months post-randomisation (primary outcome); (2) inhibition, working memory and cognitive flexibility at 18 months post-randomisation; (3) socio-emotional well-being, emotion-regulation and mental health-related behaviours at 6 and 18 months post-randomisation; (4) sustained changes in teacher practice and classroom interactions at 18 months post-randomisation. Furthermore, we aim to determine whether the implementation predicts the efficacy of the intervention, and the cost effectiveness relative to outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This cluster randomised controlled trial will be conducted in 22 primary schools in disadvantaged areas of Melbourne, Australia. 826 students in the first year of primary school will be recruited to detect between groups differences of Cohen's d=0.25 at the 18-month follow-up. Parent, teacher and child-assessment measures of child attention, emotion-regulation, executive functioning, socio-emotional well-being, mental health-related behaviour and learning, parent mental well-being, teacher well-being will be collected 6 and 18 months post-randomisation. Implementation factors will be measured throughout the study. Intention-to-treat analyses, accounting for clustering within schools and classes, will adopt a two-level random effects linear regression model to examine outcomes for the intervention versus control students. Unadjusted and analyses adjusted for baseline scores, baseline age, gender and family socioeconomic status will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been received by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Melbourne. Findings will be reported in peer-review publications, national and international conference presentations and research snapshots directly provided to participating schools and families. PRE-RESULTS TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000326190).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon L Quach
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben Deery
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Kern
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Janet Clinton
- Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Gold
- Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Francesca Orsini
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma Sciberras
- Centre for Community Child Health, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Price A, Bryson H, Smith A, Mensah F, Goldfeld S. Processes for engaging and retaining women who are experiencing adversity in longitudinal health services research. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:833. [PMID: 31727073 PMCID: PMC6854799 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4698-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women and families experiencing socioeconomic and psychosocial adversity are the least likely to access health care but most likely to benefit. For health services to effectively meet the needs of individuals experiencing adversity, research involving the health services must be truly representative. However, individuals experiencing adversity are typically excluded from or underrepresented in health services research. This paper reports on the implementation of a quality improvement approach designed to support recruitment and retention of pregnant women experiencing adversity in a longitudinal, health services randomized controlled trial (“right@home”). Methods right@home recruited Australian women from 10 public maternity hospitals across the states of Victoria and Tasmania who were experiencing adversity (≥2 risk factors on screening survey). Regular follow-up assessments were conducted by phone or face-to-face to child age 2 years. Research processes were designed taking heed of previous research demonstrating effective strategies for recruiting and retaining minority groups (e.g. piloting the recruitment process; recruiting via the health service providing care to the subgroup; remunerating participants); however, we were concerned that important information was missing. Therefore, once recruitment began, we conducted a continuous evaluation of the research processes, testing and implementing changes to processes or new strategies to maximize recruitment and retention (e.g. using a suite of strategies to maintain contact with families, using flexible data collection methods, obtaining consent for data linkage for future health and education data). Results right@home enrolled a large cohort of women (N = 722) experiencing high levels of adversity according to socioeconomic status and psychosocial risk factors, and achieved excellent retention (83% completion at 2 years). Most strategies appeared to increase recruitment and retention. All required additional time from the research team to develop and test, and some required extra funding, which ranged from minor (e.g. printing) to substantial (e.g. salaries, remuneration). Conclusions By taking a quality improvement approach, supported by sufficient resourcing and flexible research processes, it is possible to recruit and retain a large cohort of women experiencing adversity who are typically missed or lost from longitudinal research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Price
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia. .,Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.
| | - Hannah Bryson
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.,Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia
| | - Ashlee Smith
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.,Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia
| | - Fiona Mensah
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.,Clinical Sciences and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia
| | - Sharon Goldfeld
- Centre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.,Population Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|