1
|
Wilson CA, Bublitz M, Chandra P, Hanley S, Honikman S, Kittel-Schneider S, Rückl SCZ, Leahy-Warren P, Byatt N. A global perspective: Access to mental health care for perinatal populations. Semin Perinatol 2024; 48:151942. [PMID: 39048414 DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2024.151942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Perinatal mental health care differs around the world. We provide a global perspective on the current status of service provision, barriers and facilitators to access, and strategies to improve access in high-income and low- and middle-income countries across five continents (Asia, Africa, Europe, North America and South America). Many of the countries considered do not have universal healthcare coverage. This poses a challenge to perinatal mental health care access. However, there are other social and structural barriers to access, including stigma and other sources of marginalization and discrimination. Yet there are opportunities discussed herein to learn more about what perinatal mental health services work for what populations* and in what circumstances, by adopting a global lens to examine innovative solutions utilized across geographical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire A Wilson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, PO31 King's, College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
| | - Margaret Bublitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Lifespan, Physicians Group, 146 West River Street, Providence, RI 02904, USA
| | - Prabha Chandra
- National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bangalore 560029, Karnataka, India
| | - Sarah Hanley
- HSE West, Acute Adult Mental Health Unit, University Hospital Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland, H91YR71
| | - Simone Honikman
- Perinatal Mental Health Project, University of Cape Town, Centre for Public Mental Health, 46 Sawkins Road, Rondebosch 7700, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Sarah Kittel-Schneider
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioural Science, University College Cork, Cork, T12 AK54, Ireland
| | | | - Patricia Leahy-Warren
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, T12 AK54, Ireland
| | - Nancy Byatt
- UMass Chan Medical School, 222 Maple Ave, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Howard LM, Trevillion K, Potts L, Heslin M, Pickles A, Byford S, Carson LE, Dolman C, Jennings S, Johnson S, Jones I, McDonald R, Pawlby S, Powell C, Seneviratne G, Shallcross R, Stanley N, Wieck A, Abel KM. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychiatric mother and baby units: quasi-experimental study. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 221:628-636. [PMID: 35505514 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2022.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychiatric mother and baby units (MBUs) are recommended for severe perinatal mental illness, but effectiveness compared with other forms of acute care remains unknown. AIMS We hypothesised that women admitted to MBUs would be less likely to be readmitted to acute care in the 12 months following discharge, compared with women admitted to non-MBU acute care (generic psychiatric wards or crisis resolution teams (CRTs)). METHOD Quasi-experimental cohort study of women accessing acute psychiatric care up to 1 year postpartum in 42 healthcare organisations across England and Wales. Primary outcome was readmission within 12 months post-discharge. Propensity scores were used to account for systematic differences between MBU and non-MBU participants. Secondary outcomes included assessment of cost-effectiveness, experience of services, unmet needs, perceived bonding, observed mother-infant interaction quality and safeguarding outcome. RESULTS Of 279 women, 108 (39%) received MBU care, 62 (22%) generic ward care and 109 (39%) CRT care only. The MBU group (n = 105) had similar readmission rates to the non-MBU group (n = 158) (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.04, P = 0.29; an absolute difference of -5%, 95% CI -14 to 4%). Service satisfaction was significantly higher among women accessing MBUs compared with non-MBUs; no significant differences were observed for any other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We found no significant differences in rates of readmission, but MBU advantage might have been masked by residual confounders; readmission will also depend on quality of care after discharge and type of illness. Future studies should attempt to identify the effective ingredients of specialist perinatal in-patient and community care to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise M Howard
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Kylee Trevillion
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Laura Potts
- Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London, UK
| | - Margaret Heslin
- King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Andrew Pickles
- Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King's College London, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Lauren E Carson
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Clare Dolman
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Stacey Jennings
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | | | - Ian Jones
- National Centre for Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Rebecca McDonald
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Susan Pawlby
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Claire Powell
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | | | - Rebekah Shallcross
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| | - Nicky Stanley
- School of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Angelika Wieck
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kathryn M Abel
- Centre for Women's Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Perinatal mental health has become a significant focus of interest in recent years, with investment in new specialist mental health services in some high-income countries, and inpatient psychiatric mother and baby units in diverse settings. In this paper, we summarize and critically examine the epidemiology and impact of perinatal mental disorders, including emerging evidence of an increase of their prevalence in young pregnant women. Perinatal mental disorders are among the commonest morbidities of pregnancy, and make an important contribution to maternal mortality, as well as to adverse neonatal, infant and child outcomes. We then review the current evidence base on interventions, including individual level and public health ones, as well as service delivery models. Randomized controlled trials provide evidence on the effectiveness of psychological and psychosocial interventions at the individual level, though it is not yet clear which women with perinatal mental disorders also need additional support for parenting. The evidence base on psychotropic use in pregnancy is almost exclusively observational. There is little research on the full range of perinatal mental disorders, on how to improve access to treatment for women with psychosocial difficulties, and on the effectiveness of different service delivery models. We conclude with research and clinical implications, which, we argue, highlight the need for an extension of generic psychiatric services to include preconception care, and further investment into public health interventions, in addition to perinatal mental health services, potentially for women and men, to reduce maternal and child morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise M. Howard
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research DepartmentInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hind Khalifeh
- Section of Women's Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research DepartmentInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|