1
|
Birkinshaw H, Friedrich CM, Cole P, Eccleston C, Serfaty M, Stewart G, White S, Moore RA, Phillippo D, Pincus T. Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 5:CD014682. [PMID: 37160297 PMCID: PMC10169288 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014682.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is common in adults, and often has a detrimental impact upon physical ability, well-being, and quality of life. Previous reviews have shown that certain antidepressants may be effective in reducing pain with some benefit in improving patients' global impression of change for certain chronic pain conditions. However, there has not been a network meta-analysis (NMA) examining all antidepressants across all chronic pain conditions. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of antidepressants for adults with chronic pain (except headache). SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, AMED and PsycINFO databases, and clinical trials registries, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions in January 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included RCTs that examined antidepressants for chronic pain against any comparator. If the comparator was placebo, another medication, another antidepressant, or the same antidepressant at different doses, then we required the study to be double-blind. We included RCTs with active comparators that were unable to be double-blinded (e.g. psychotherapy) but rated them as high risk of bias. We excluded RCTs where the follow-up was less than two weeks and those with fewer than 10 participants in each arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors separately screened, data extracted, and judged risk of bias. We synthesised the data using Bayesian NMA and pairwise meta-analyses for each outcome and ranked the antidepressants in terms of their effectiveness using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). We primarily used Confidence in Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) and Risk of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN) to assess the certainty of the evidence. Where it was not possible to use CINeMA and ROB-MEN due to the complexity of the networks, we used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Our primary outcomes were substantial (50%) pain relief, pain intensity, mood, and adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were moderate pain relief (30%), physical function, sleep, quality of life, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), serious adverse events, and withdrawal. MAIN RESULTS This review and NMA included 176 studies with a total of 28,664 participants. The majority of studies were placebo-controlled (83), and parallel-armed (141). The most common pain conditions examined were fibromyalgia (59 studies); neuropathic pain (49 studies) and musculoskeletal pain (40 studies). The average length of RCTs was 10 weeks. Seven studies provided no useable data and were omitted from the NMA. The majority of studies measured short-term outcomes only and excluded people with low mood and other mental health conditions. Across efficacy outcomes, duloxetine was consistently the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate- to high-certainty evidence. In duloxetine studies, standard dose was equally efficacious as high dose for the majority of outcomes. Milnacipran was often ranked as the next most efficacious antidepressant, although the certainty of evidence was lower than that of duloxetine. There was insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressant for chronic pain. Primary efficacy outcomes Duloxetine standard dose (60 mg) showed a small to moderate effect for substantial pain relief (odds ratio (OR) 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69 to 2.17; 16 studies, 4490 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and continuous pain intensity (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.31, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.24; 18 studies, 4959 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). For pain intensity, milnacipran standard dose (100 mg) also showed a small effect (SMD -0.22, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.06; 4 studies, 1866 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Mirtazapine (30 mg) had a moderate effect on mood (SMD -0.5, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.22; 1 study, 406 participants; low-certainty evidence), while duloxetine showed a small effect (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.22 to -0.1; 26 studies, 7952 participants; moderate-certainty evidence); however it is important to note that most studies excluded participants with mental health conditions, and so average anxiety and depression scores tended to be in the 'normal' or 'subclinical' ranges at baseline already. Secondary efficacy outcomes Across all secondary efficacy outcomes (moderate pain relief, physical function, sleep, quality of life, and PGIC), duloxetine and milnacipran were the highest-ranked antidepressants with moderate-certainty evidence, although effects were small. For both duloxetine and milnacipran, standard doses were as efficacious as high doses. Safety There was very low-certainty evidence for all safety outcomes (adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawal) across all antidepressants. We cannot draw any reliable conclusions from the NMAs for these outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Our review and NMAs show that despite studies investigating 25 different antidepressants, the only antidepressant we are certain about for the treatment of chronic pain is duloxetine. Duloxetine was moderately efficacious across all outcomes at standard dose. There is also promising evidence for milnacipran, although further high-quality research is needed to be confident in these conclusions. Evidence for all other antidepressants was low certainty. As RCTs excluded people with low mood, we were unable to establish the effects of antidepressants for people with chronic pain and depression. There is currently no reliable evidence for the long-term efficacy of any antidepressant, and no reliable evidence for the safety of antidepressants for chronic pain at any time point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hollie Birkinshaw
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Peter Cole
- Oxford Pain Relief Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Simon White
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | | | - Tamar Pincus
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Song SY, Ko YB, Kim H, Lee GW, Yang JB, Chang HK, Kwak SM, Jung J, Lee S, Lee SY, Yoo HJ. Effect of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for patients with chemotherapy-induced painful peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e18653. [PMID: 31895829 PMCID: PMC6946453 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000018653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the efficacy of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) METHODS:: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochran Library, and Web of Science to identify and review articles published from January 1998 until December 2018 according to selection criteria. Outcomes were expressed as mean difference, the pooled odds ratio, or relative risk in a meta-analysis model. RESULTS A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis: 6 randomized-controlled studies and 4 observational studies. Meta-analysis showed that CIPN was improved after treatment with SNRI (standardized mean difference = 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-3.49; I = 93% in 3 randomized controlled studies). Somnolence and insomnia occurred in <15% of patients. Incidence of somnolence was lower than with pregabalin treatment, and insomnia was comparable to that in expectant management or pregabalin treatment. Incidence of nausea and vomiting was higher than in expectant management, but no significant difference was found when compared to expectant management. CONCLUSION From the several available studies suitable for indirect comparison, SNRI shows excellent efficacy and tolerability to CIPN. SNRI could provide an important treatment option for CIPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Youn Song
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| | - Young Bok Ko
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| | - Hyeun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| | - Geon Woo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| | - Jung Bo Yang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| | - Ha Kyun Chang
- Department of Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang
| | - Sang Mi Kwak
- Department of Family Medicine, Health Screening Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul
| | - Jaeyun Jung
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
- Mielle Dermatology & Plastic Surgery Network Clinic, Busan
| | - Siyeo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Yeul Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| | - Heon Jong Yoo
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matsuoka H, Iwase S, Miyaji T, Kawaguchi T, Ariyoshi K, Oyamada S, Satomi E, Ishiki H, Hasuo H, Sakuma H, Tokoro A, Matsuda Y, Tahara K, Otani H, Ohtake Y, Tsukuura H, Matsumoto Y, Hasegawa Y, Kataoka Y, Otsuka M, Sakai K, Nakura M, Morita T, Yamaguchi T, Koyama A. Predictors of duloxetine response in patients with neuropathic cancer pain: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial-JORTC-PAL08 (DIRECT) study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:2931-2939. [PMID: 31761974 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05138-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Duloxetine has some effect against cancer neuropathic pain (CNP); however, predictors of duloxetine response are unclear. This study sought to identify predictors of duloxetine response in patients with CNP. METHODS Patients (N = 70) with CNP unresponsive to or intolerant of opioid-pregabalin combination therapy, with a brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) Item 5 score (average pain) ≥ 4, and with a total hospital anxiety and depression scale score < 20, were randomized to a duloxetine or a placebo group. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to identify predictors of duloxetine response as a secondary analysis with the change in the average pain score on day 10 from day 0 as the dependent variable, and the following five covariates; baseline (day 0) average pain score, baseline opioid dose, continuation/discontinuation of pregabalin, and items 20 and 21 score of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2) as independent variables. RESULTS Of the four domains (continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, and affective descriptors) score of SF-MPQ-2 on day 0, significant differences were observed in the neuropathic pain domain (p = 0.040) in change on the average pain between day 10 and day 0 in the duloxetine group. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that patients with a high score for SF-MPQ-2 Item 21 (tingling pain) on day 0 had a significantly greater change in average pain between day 10 and day 0 (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION Patients with a high score for SF-MPQ-2 Item 21 might benefit more from duloxetine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromichi Matsuoka
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. .,Palliative Care Center, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. .,Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Satoru Iwase
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tempei Miyaji
- Department of Clinical Trial Data Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawaguchi
- Department of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ariyoshi
- Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC), JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Oyamada
- Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC), JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko Satomi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroto Ishiki
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hasuo
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Sakuma
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tokoro
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Kazuki Tahara
- Yamanobe General Hospital Internal medicine, Nara, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otani
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoichi Ohtake
- Itami Seifu Hospital Internal medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | - Yoshihisa Matsumoto
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Hasegawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Yuki Kataoka
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masatomo Otsuka
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyohiro Sakai
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,Palliative Care Center, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Miki Nakura
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Atsuko Koyama
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.,Palliative Care Center, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsuoka H, Iwase S, Miyaji T, Kawaguchi T, Ariyoshi K, Oyamada S, Satomi E, Ishiki H, Hasuo H, Sakuma H, Tokoro A, Shinomiya T, Otani H, Ohtake Y, Tsukuura H, Matsumoto Y, Hasegawa Y, Kataoka Y, Otsuka M, Sakai K, Matsuda Y, Morita T, Koyama A, Yamaguchi T. Additive Duloxetine for Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain Nonresponsive or Intolerant to Opioid-Pregabalin Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (JORTC-PAL08). J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:645-653. [PMID: 31254640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although opioids and pregabalin are widely used for cancer-related neuropathic pain (CNP), no clinical trials exist to determine which medications are effective when an opioid-pregabalin combination therapy fails. OBJECTIVES We investigated the efficacy of duloxetine for CNP nonresponsive or intolerant to opioid-pregabalin combination therapy. METHODS A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed at 12 specialized palliative care services in Japan. Patients with CNP average pain scores (Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]-Item 5) ≥ 4 in the previous 24 hours and nonresponsive or intolerant to opioid-pregabalin combination therapy were eligible. Patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies were excluded. Patients were administered duloxetine 20 mg/day titrated to 40 mg/day or placebo for 10 days. The primary endpoint was BPI-Item 5 on Day 10. Responder analysis measured proportions of patients with 30% and 50% pain decreases. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled. Complete case analysis revealed mean BPI-Item 5 on Day 10 of 4.03 for Group D vs. 4.88 for Group P (P = 0.053). Baseline observation carried forward analysis revealed mean BPI-Item 5 on Day 10 of 4.06 and 4.91 for Groups D and P, respectively (P = 0.048). Clinically meaningful pain improvement (≥30%) was reported by 44.1% (n = 15) of patients in Group D vs. 18.2% (n = 6) in Group P (P = 0.02); 32.4% (n = 11) vs. 3.0% (n = 1) of patients in Groups D and P, respectively, reported pain reduction ≥ 50% (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Adding duloxetine to opioid-pregabalin therapy might have clinical benefit in alleviating refractory CNP. Further studies are needed to conclude the efficacy of adding duloxetine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromichi Matsuoka
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT) and Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Satoru Iwase
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tempei Miyaji
- Department of Clinical Trial Data Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawaguchi
- Department of Practical Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ariyoshi
- Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC), JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Oyamada
- Japanese Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC), JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eriko Satomi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroto Ishiki
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideaki Hasuo
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Sakuma
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Tokoro
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Shinomiya
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Otani
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoichi Ohtake
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine and Palliative Care, Sakai City Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Tsukuura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Matsumoto
- Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Hasegawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan
| | - Yuki Kataoka
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masatomo Otsuka
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - Kiyohiro Sakai
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Matsuda
- Department of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Atsuko Koyama
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Division of Biostatistics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quintão NLM, Santin JR, Stoeberl LC, Corrêa TP, Melato J, Costa R. Pharmacological Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain: PPARγ Agonists as a Promising Tool. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:907. [PMID: 31555078 PMCID: PMC6722212 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP) is one of the most severe side effects of anticancer agents, such as platinum- and taxanes-derived drugs (oxaliplatin, cisplatin, carboplatin and paclitaxel). CINP may even be a factor of interruption of treatment and consequently increasing the risk of death. Besides that, it is important to take into consideration that the incidence of cancer is increasing worldwide, including colorectal, gastric, lung, cervical, ovary and breast cancers, all treated with the aforementioned drugs, justifying the concern of the medical community about the patient’s quality of life. Several physiopathological mechanisms have already been described for CINP, such as changes in axonal transport, mitochondrial damage, increased ion channel activity and inflammation in the central nervous system (CNS). Another less frequent event that may occur after chemotherapy, particularly under oxaliplatin treatment, is the central neurotoxicity leading to disorders such as mental confusion, catatonia, hyporeflexia, etc. To date, no pharmacological therapy has shown satisfactory effect in these cases. In this scenario, duloxetine is the only drug currently in clinical use. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) belong to the class of nuclear receptors and are present in several tissues, mainly participating in lipid and glucose metabolism and inflammatory response. There are three PPAR isoforms: α, β/δ and γ. PPARγ, the protagonist of this review, is expressed in adipose tissue, large intestine, spleen and neutrophils. This subtype also plays important role in energy balance, lipid biosynthesis and adipogenesis. The effects of PPARγ agonists, known for their positive activity on type II diabetes mellitus, have been explored and present promising effects in the control of neuropathic pain, including CINP, and also cancer. This review focuses largely on the mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and the effects of the activation of PPARγ to treat CINP. It is the aim of this review to help understanding and developing novel CINP therapeutic strategies integrating PPARγ signalling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jéssica Melato
- School of Heath Science, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Itajaí, Brazil
| | - Robson Costa
- School of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Off-label Antidepressant Use for Treatment and Management of Chronic Pain: Evolving Understanding and Comprehensive Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:66. [DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0803-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
7
|
Matsuoka H, Tagami K, Ariyoshi K, Oyamada S, Kizawa Y, Inoue A, Koyama A. Attitude of Japanese palliative care specialists towards adjuvant analgesics cancer-related neuropathic pain refractory to opioid therapy: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2019; 49:486-490. [PMID: 30793161 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer-related neuropathic pain (CNP) requires therapy involving multiple pharmaceuticals, including anticonvulsants and antidepressants; however, strong evidence to support this practice is limited. This study is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. As the standard dose of adjuvant analgesics for CNP refractory to opioid therapy is not clear, the purpose of this study is to clarify the opinions of specialists about the usage of duloxetine and pregabalin for patients with CNP refractory to opioid therapy. Two hundred and eight certified palliative care specialists were surveyed and a total of 87 (42%) responses were analyzed. Twenty-five percent of specialists had considered increasing duloxetine doses up to 60 mg/day and 58% had considered increasing pregabalin doses up to 300 mg/day for CNP refractory to opioid therapy. However, 23% of the specialists succeeded in increasing duloxetine doses up to 60 mg/day and 17% in increasing pregabalin doses up to 300 mg/day, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromichi Matsuoka
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama City, Osaka, Japan.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Keita Tagami
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Akira Inoue
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Atsuko Koyama
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama City, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reich M, Bondenet X. Place des psychotropes en oncologie. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE 2018. [DOI: 10.3166/pson-2018-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|