1
|
Chauhan A, Chitkara U, Walsan R, Sansom-Daly UM, Manias E, Seah D, Dalli A, El-Kabbout N, Tieu T, Sarwar M, Faiz M, Huang N, Rocha VM, Pal A, Harrison R. Co-designing strategies to improve advance care planning among people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds with cancer: iCanCarePlan study protocol. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:123. [PMID: 38760714 PMCID: PMC11102140 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) describes the process of supporting individuals at any age or stage of health to consider and share their personal values, life goals, and preferences regarding future health care. Engaging in ACP is associated with better-quality of care in which people receive care in lines with their wishes, values and preferences. Direct translations of ACP guides and resources do not attend to the considerable inter- and intra-ethnic variations in cultural and religious or spiritual beliefs that shape preferences among people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds. ICanCarePlan is a three-year project that aims to determine the prevalence of ACP documentation among people from CALD backgrounds with cancer, identify resources available and their use to support ACP among CALD communities, identify barriers and facilitators of person-centred ACP, and to develop, through co-design with consumers and clinicians, approaches that enhance the process ACP for people from CALD backgrounds. METHOD A mixed-method sequential approach will be used comprising of four studies. Study one is retrospective medical record review of approximately 1500 medical records to establish the prevalence of ACP documentation among CALD patient records in cancer services. Study two is a document analysis synthesising the resources available in the Australian health system to support ACP. Study three is a qualitative study with healthcare staff and consumers to explore barriers and enablers of person-centred ACP. Evidence generated from studies one to three will inform the conduct of co-design with stakeholders to develop approaches to improve ACP processes among CALD communities. Language, technical and financial support for meaningful involvement with consumers from CALD backgrounds throughout this project is outlined. A plan for distress management is also made due to sensitive nature of the topic. The research project has also established a project steering group consisting of three consumer members who are from CALD backgrounds. DISCUSSION The project will address a national priority issue for a growing population of CALD communities in Australia. The project will provide novel evidence of ACP among CALD communities and novel strategies developed with stakeholders to enhance uptake and experiences of ACP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashfaq Chauhan
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia.
| | - Upma Chitkara
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Ramya Walsan
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Ursula M Sansom-Daly
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Manias
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Davinia Seah
- Sacred Heart Supportive and Palliative Care, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Angie Dalli
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Thit Tieu
- Sisters' Cancer Support Group Inc., Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Mashreka Sarwar
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Misbah Faiz
- District Clinical Governance, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nancy Huang
- Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Abhijit Pal
- Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Reema Harrison
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Level 6, 75 Talavera Road, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nicholas R, Nicholas E, Hannides M, Gautam V, Friede T, Koffman J. Influence of individual, illness and environmental factors on place of death among people with neurodegenerative diseases: a retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021:bmjspcare-2021-003105. [PMID: 34489324 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In long-term neurological conditions, location of death is poorly understood but is seen as a marker of quality of dying. OBJECTIVE To examine individual, illness and environmental factors on place of death among people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD) in isolation or in combination and compare them with people without either condition. METHODS Retrospective, observational, comparative cohort study of 582 people with MS, 579 people with PD and 95 controls from UK Multiple Sclerosis and Parkinson's Disease Tissue Bank. A subset of people with MS and PD were selected for analysis of individual clinical encounters 2 years before death and further subset of all groups for analysis of impact of advance care planning (ACP) and recognition of dying. RESULTS People with MS died more often (50.8%) in hospital than those with PD (35.3%). Examining individual clinical encounters over 2 years (4931 encounters) identified increased contact with services 12 months before death (F(1, 58)=69.71, p<0.0001) but was not associated with non-hospital deaths (F(1, 58)=1.001, p=0.321). The presence of ACPs and recognition of dying were high among people with MS and PD and both associated with a non-hospital death. ACPs were more likely to prevent hospital deaths when initiated by general practitioners (GPs) compared with other professional groups (χ2=68.77, p=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS For people with MS and PD, ACPs contribute to reducing dying in hospital. ACPs appear to be most effective when facilitated by GPs underlining the importance of primary care involvement in delivering holistic care at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Nicholas
- UK Multiple Sclerosis Tissue Bank, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Emma Nicholas
- UK Multiple Sclerosis Tissue Bank, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mike Hannides
- UK Multiple Sclerosis Tissue Bank, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Vishal Gautam
- UK Multiple Sclerosis Tissue Bank, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Friede
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jonathan Koffman
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabiltation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah R, Lee SC, Strasser RB, Grossman C. An Australian Neuro-Palliative perspective on Huntington's disease: a case report. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:53. [PMID: 33794853 PMCID: PMC8017854 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00744-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Huntington's Disease (HD) is an incurable, progressive neuro-degenerative disease. For patients with HD access to palliative care services is limited, with dedicated Neuro-Palliative Care Services rare in Australia. We discuss the experiences of and benefits to a patient with late-stage HD admitted to our Neuro-Palliative Care service. CASE PRESENTATION We present the case of a patient with a 16-year history of HD from time of initial genetic testing to admission to our Neuro-Palliative Care service with late-stage disease. CONCLUSIONS Given the prolonged, fluctuating and heterogenous HD trajectory, measures need to be implemented to improve earlier access to multi-specialty integrative palliative care services. Given the good outcomes of our case, we strongly advocate for the role of specialised Neuro-Palliative Care services to bridge the gap between clinical need and accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajvi Shah
- Calvary Health Care Bethlehem, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Sarah Cm Lee
- Calvary Health Care Bethlehem, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bryant J, Sellars M, Waller A, Detering K, Sinclair C, Ruseckaite R, White B, Nolte L. Advance care planning participation by people with dementia: a cross-sectional survey and medical record audit. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021; 12:bmjspcare-2020-002550. [PMID: 33658249 PMCID: PMC9380490 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe among individuals with dementia: (1) self-reported awareness of, and engagement in, advance care planning; (2) presence of advance care planning documentation in the health record and (3) concordance between self-reported completion of advance care planning and presence of documentation in the health record. METHODS An Australian prospective multicentre audit and cross-sectional survey. Individuals diagnosed with dementia who were able to speak English and were judged by a healthcare provider as having decision-making capacity were recruited from self-selected hospitals, residential aged care facilities and general practices across Australia. RESULTS Fifty-two people with dementia completed surveys and were included. Overall, 59.6% of participants had heard about advance care planning and 55.8% had discussed advance care planning with someone, most often a family member (48.1%). While 38.5% of participants had appointed a medical substitute decision maker, only 26.9% reported that they had written down their values and preferences for future care. Concordance between self-reported completion of advance care planning and presence of documentation in the health record was low (56.8%, κ=0.139; 57.7%, κ=0.053). CONCLUSION Effective models that promote discussion, documentation and accessible storage of advance care planning documents for people with dementia are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Detering
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Craig Sinclair
- Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben White
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda Nolte
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bryant J, Sellars M, Sinclair C, Detering K, Buck K, Waller A, White B, Nolte L. Inadequate completion of advance care directives by individuals with dementia: national audit of health and aged care facilities. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021; 12:bmjspcare-2020-002767. [PMID: 33397661 PMCID: PMC9380476 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (i) Describe the prevalence and type of advance care directives (ACDs) and other advance care planning (ACP) documentation completed by persons with dementia, healthcare providers and others on behalf of a person with dementia; (ii) identify the personal and ACP programme characteristics associated with having ACP documentation in the health record; (iii) identify the personal and ACP programme characteristics associated with having a self-completed ACD. METHODS A multicentre audit was undertaken in Australian hospitals, general practices and residential aged care facilities. Auditors extracted demographic and ACP data from the records of eligible patients. ACP programme characteristics were provided by a site representative. Logistic and multinomial regression were used respectively to examine the factors associated with completion of any ACP documentation, and self-completion of an ACD by persons with dementia. RESULTS A total of 1388 people with dementia (33.2%) from 96 sites were included. Overall, 60.8% (n=844) had ACP documentation; 31.6% (n=438) had a self-completed ACD and 29.3% (n=406) had an ACP document completed by a health professional or someone else on their behalf. Older participants were more likely to have ACP documented. Multivariate analyses indicated the odds of having self-completed ACP documents, compared with no advance care plan or ACP completed by someone else, were significantly influenced by age, country of birth, setting and whether the site had ACP training, policies or guidelines. DISCUSSION While 60% of people with dementia had some form of ACP documentation, only half of the cases in which ACP was documented included an ACD completed by the person themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Craig Sinclair
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Detering
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kimberly Buck
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Ben White
- Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda Nolte
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Panozzo L, Harvey P, Adams MJ, O’Connor D, Ward B. Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice. BMC Palliat Care 2020; 19:108. [PMID: 32664925 PMCID: PMC7359590 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00613-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Doctors, particularly general practitioners, play a significant role in assisting patients to create advance care plans. When medically indicated, these documents are important tools to promote congruence between end-of-life care and patient's personal preferences. Despite this, little is known regarding the availability of these documents in hospitals. The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of people who died in hospital without an advance care plan and how many of these had advance care planning (ACP) documents in their general practice records. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patient hospital records with manual linkage to general practice records. The large regional hospital in Victoria, Australia has a catchment population in excess of 300,000 people. The study sample was patients aged 75 years and over who died in the hospital between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017. The hospital records of these patients were examined to identify those which did not have a system alert for ACP documents on the file. Alerted ACP documents were limited to those legislated in the state of Victoria: advance care plan, Enduring Power of Attorney (Medical Treatment) or Enduring Power of Guardianship. Where no ACP document system alert was found in the hospital record, the patient's nominated general practice was consented to participate and the corresponding general practice record was examined. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of the 406 patients who died in hospital, 76.1% (309) did not have a system alert for any ACP document. Of the 309 hospital records without a system alert, 144 (46.7%) corresponding general practice records were examined. Of these, 14.6% included at least one ACP document, including four advance care plans, that were not available in hospital. CONCLUSIONS Unless ACP documents are consistently communicated from general practice, patient's preferences may be unknown during end-of-life care. It is important that both doctors and patients are supported to use connected electronic health records to ensure that documents are readily available to healthcare staff when they are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Panozzo
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, 26 Mercy Street, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 Australia
| | - Pam Harvey
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, 26 Mercy Street, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 Australia
- La Trobe Rural Health School, Edwards Road, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 Australia
| | - Meagan-Jane Adams
- Bendigo Health, 100 Barnard Street, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 Australia
| | - Dennis O’Connor
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, 26 Mercy Street, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 Australia
| | - Bernadette Ward
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, 26 Mercy Street, Bendigo, Victoria 3550 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Detering KM, Buck K, Sellars M, Kelly H, Sinclair C, White B, Nolte L. Prospective multicentre cross-sectional audit among older Australians accessing health and residential aged care services: protocol for a national advance care directive prevalence study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031691. [PMID: 31662395 PMCID: PMC6830836 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Advance care planning (ACP), an ongoing communication and planning process, aims to clarify a person's values and preferences, so these guide decision-making if the person becomes unable to make his or her own decisions. Ideally, ACP results in completion of advance care directives (ACD), documents completed by competent people outlining their values, treatment preferences and/or appointment of a substitute decision-maker (SDM). ACDs are most effective at the point of care, where they can be used to inform treatment decisions. Australian governments fund initiatives and have developed policy to increase ACD completion rates. However, little is known about the prevalence of ACDs at the point of care in Australian health services, making ACP evaluation efforts difficult. This study aims to determine the prevalence of ACDs in records of older people in Australian hospitals, aged care facilities and general practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a national multicentre cross-sectional prevalence study in selected aged care facilities, hospitals and general practices. Following a 2017 feasibility study, a new protocol incorporating key learnings was developed. Sites will be recruited via expression of interest process. Health records of people aged ≥65 years, admitted to or attending services on study day(s) will be audited by trained staff from sites. Site-level data will be collected during the expression of interest. The primary outcome is the presence of at least one ACD in the health record. Secondary outcomes include prevalence of other documented outcomes of ACP (by health practitioner(s)/family/SDM), assessment of ACD quality and content and concordance between the person's documented preferences and any medical treatment orders. Individuals and sites characteristics where ACDs are present will be explored. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Protocol approval by Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee, Melbourne, Australia (reference: HREC/18/Austin/109). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Participating sites and jurisdictions will receive individualised reports of findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Detering
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kimberly Buck
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helana Kelly
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Craig Sinclair
- Centre of Excellence in Population Aging Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ben White
- Australian Centre for Health Research Law, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Linda Nolte
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Waller A, Sanson-Fisher R, Nair BRK, Evans T. Are older and seriously ill inpatients planning ahead for future medical care? BMC Geriatr 2019; 19:212. [PMID: 31382893 PMCID: PMC6683455 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1211-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the perceived ethical, personal and health service benefits of advance care planning (ACP), the extent to which older and seriously ill Australian inpatients have considered future health decisions remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine in a sample of older and seriously ill inpatients, the proportion who had: 1) engaged in four advance care planning (ACP) activities; 2) not engaged in ACP activities but wanted to; and 3) reasons why they had not engaged. Methods Cross-sectional face-to-face standardised interview survey with inpatients in a tertiary referral centre who were either: aged 80+ years; aged 55+ years with progressive chronic disease(s); or judged by treating clinicians as having a life expectancy of less than 12 months. Patients indicated whether they had engaged in four ACP activities: (1) appointed medical substitute-decision-maker(s), (2) recorded end-of-life wishes in an advance directive or care plan; and talked about their end-of-life wishes with their: (3) support persons and/or (4) doctors. Patients who had not engaged in activities were asked whether they wished this to occur and reasons why. Results One hundred eighty-six inpatients consented to the study (80% of approached). Of these, 9% (n = 16) had engaged in four ACP activities; 27% (n = 50) had not engaged in any. Half (n = 94, 52%) had appointed a medical substitute-decision-maker, 27% (n = 50) had recorded wishes in an advance directive or care plan, 51% (n = 90) had talked about their end-of-life wishes with support persons and 27% (n = 48) had talked with their doctor. Patients who wanted to, but had not, engaged in the four ACP activities were unaware they could record wishes or appoint decision-makers, or indicated providers had not initiated conversations. Conclusion Relatively few inpatients had engaged in all four ACP activities. More inpatients had discussed end of life issues with family and appointed substitute decision makers, than completed written documents or talked with doctors. Community education and a more active role for community and hospital-based providers in supporting patients and families to collaboratively resolve end-of-life decisions may increase the probability wishes are known and followed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-019-1211-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Balakrishnan R Kichu Nair
- John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health (Medical Education and Professional Development), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Tiffany Evans
- Clinical Research Design and Statistics Support Unit, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Detering KM, Buck K, Ruseckaite R, Kelly H, Sellars M, Sinclair C, Clayton JM, Nolte L. Prevalence and correlates of advance care directives among older Australians accessing health and residential aged care services: multicentre audit study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025255. [PMID: 30647047 PMCID: PMC6340468 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES It is important that the outcomes of advance care planning (ACP) conversations are documented and available at the point of care. Advance care directives (ACDs) are a subset of ACP documentation and refer to structured documents that are completed and signed by competent adults. Other ACP documentation includes informal documentation by the person or on behalf of the person by someone else (eg, clinician, family). The primary objectives were to describe the prevalence and correlates of ACDs among Australians aged 65 and over accessing health and residential aged care services. The secondary aim was to describe the prevalence of other ACP documentation. DESIGN AND SETTING A prospective multicentre health record audit in general practices (n=13), hospitals (n=12) and residential aged care facilities (RACFs; n=26). PARTICIPANTS 503 people attending general practice, 574 people admitted to hospitals and 1208 people in RACFs. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Prevalence of one or more ACDs; prevalence of other ACP documentation. RESULTS 29.8% of people had at least one ACD on file. The majority were non-statutory documents (20.9%). ACD prevalence was significantly higher in RACFs (47.7%) than hospitals (15.7%) and general practices (3.2%) (p<0.001), and varied across jurisdictions. Multivariate logistic regression showed that the odds of having an ACD were positively associated with greater functional impairment and being in an RACF or hospital compared with general practice. 21.6% of people had other ACP documentation. CONCLUSIONS In this study, 30% of people had ACDs accessible and a further 20% had other ACP documentation, suggesting that approximately half of participants had some form of ACP. Correlates of ACD completion were greater impairment and being in an RACF or hospital. Greater efforts to promote and standardise ACDs across jurisdictions may help to assist older people to navigate and complete ACDs and to receive care consistent with their preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12617000743369.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen M Detering
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kimberly Buck
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helana Kelly
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Craig Sinclair
- Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, University of Western Australia, Albany, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Josephine M Clayton
- Centre for Learning and Research in Palliative Care, Hammond Care, Greenwich Hospital and Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Linda Nolte
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Waller A, Sanson-Fisher R, Ries N, Bryant J. Increasing advance personal planning: the need for action at the community level. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:606. [PMID: 29739369 PMCID: PMC5941331 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5523-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance personal planning is the process by which people consider, document and communicate their preferences for personal, financial and health matters in case they lose the ability to make decisions or express their wishes in the future. DISCUSSION Advance personal planning is most often undertaken by individuals who are seriously ill, often in the context of a medical crisis and/or at the time of admission to hospital. However, the clinical utility and legal validity of the planning process may be compromised in these circumstances. Patients may lack sufficient capacity to meaningfully engage in advance personal planning; there may be insufficient time to adequately reflect on and discuss wishes with key others; and there may also be limited opportunity for inter-professional input and collaboration in the process. Here, we propose an agenda for research to advance the science of advance personal planning by promoting a 'whole community' approach. Adoption of advance personal planning at a community level may be achieved using a variety of strategies including public media campaigns, intervening with professionals across a range of health care and legal settings, and mobilising support from influential groups and local government. One potentially promising method for encouraging earlier adoption of advance personal planning among a broader population involves a community action approach, whereby multiple evidence-based strategies are integrated across multiple access points. Community action involves calling on community members, professionals, community and/or government organisations to work collaboratively to design and systematically implement intervention strategies with the aim of bringing about desired behaviour change. An example of a community action trial to improving uptake and quality of advance personal planning is described. CONCLUSION While promising, there is a need for rigorous evidence to demonstrate whether a community action approach is effective in establishing whole community adoption of advance personal planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. .,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Nola Ries
- Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|