How do ED patients with criminal justice contact compare with other ED users? A retrospective analysis of ED visits in California

Emergency department use in people who experience imprisonment in Ontario, Canada

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to describe emergency department (ED) utilization by people in provincial prison and on release, and to compare with ED utilization for the general population.

METHODS

We linked correctional and health administrative data for people released from provincial prison in Ontario in 2010. We matched each person by age and sex with four people in the general population. We compared ED utilization rates using generalized estimating equations, by sex and for high urgency and ambulatory care sensitive conditions.

RESULTS

People who experienced imprisonment (N = 48,861) had higher ED utilization rates compared with the general population (N = 195,444), with rate ratios of 3.2 (95% CI 3.0-4.4) for men and 6.5 (95% CI 5.6-7.5) for women in prison and a range of rate ratios between 3.1 and 7.7 for men and 4.2 and 8.8 for women over the 2 years after release. Most ED visits were high urgency, and between 1.0% and 5.1% of visits were for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. ED utilization rates increased on release from prison.

CONCLUSIONS

People experiencing imprisonment in Ontario have higher ED utilization compared with matched people in the general population, primarily for urgent issues, and particularly in women and in the week after release. Providing high-quality ED care and implementing prison- and ED-based interventions could improve health for this population and prevent the need for ED use.

Surgical Diseases are Common and Complicated for Criminal Justice Involved Populations

BACKGROUND

At any given time, almost 2 million individuals are in prisons or jails in the United States. Incarceration status has been associated with disproportionate rates of cancer and infectious diseases. However, little is known about the burden emergency general surgery (EGS) in criminal justice involved (CJI) populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) database was used to evaluate all hospital admissions with common EGS diagnoses in CJI persons from 2012-2014. The population of CJI individuals in California was determined using United States Bureau of Justice Statistics data. Primary outcomes were rates of admission and procedures for five common EGS diagnoses, while the secondary outcome was probability of complex presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 4,345 admissions for CJI patients with EGS diagnoses were identified. The largest percentage of EGS admissions were with peptic ulcer disease (41.0%), followed by gallbladder disease (27.5%), small bowel obstruction (14.0%), appendicitis (13.8%), and diverticulitis (10.5%). CJI patients had variable probabilities of receipt of surgery depending on condition, ranging from 6.2% to 90.7%. 5.6% to 21.0% of admissions presented with complicated disease, the highest being with peptic ulcer disease and appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

Admissions with EGS diagnoses were common and comparable to previously published rates of disease in general population. CJI individuals had high rates of complicated presentation, but low rates of surgical intervention. More granular evaluation of the burden and management of these common, morbid, and costly surgical diagnoses is essential for ensuring timely and quality care delivery for this vulnerable population.

The Influence of Social Determinants of Health on Emergency Departments Visits in a Medicaid Sample

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We evaluate the relationship between social determinants of health and emergency department (ED) visits in the Medicaid Cohort of the District of Columbia.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 8,943 adult Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a social determinants of health survey at study enrollment. We merged the social determinants of health data with participants' Medicaid claims data for up to 24 months before enrollment. Using latent class analysis, we grouped our participants into 4 distinct social risk classes based on similar responses to the social determinants of health questions. We classified ED visits as primary care treatable or ED care needed, using the Minnesota algorithm. We calculated the adjusted log relative primary care treatable and ED care needed visit rates among the social risk classes by using generalized linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

The majority (71%) of the 49,111 ED visits made by the 8,943 participants were ED care needed. The adjusted log relative rate of both primary care treatable and ED care needed visit rates increased with each higher (worse) social risk class compared with the lowest class. Participants in the highest social risk class (ie, unemployed and many social risks) had a log relative primary care treatable and ED care needed rate of 39% (range 28% to 50%) and 29% (range 21% to 38%), respectively, adjusted for age, sex, and illness severity.

CONCLUSION

There is a strong relationship between social determinants of health and ED utilization in this Medicaid sample that is worth investigating in other Medicaid samples and patient populations.

Indiana's Section 1115 Medicaid Waiver And Interagency Coordination Improve Enrollment For Justice-Involved Adults

Timely access to Medicaid coverage offers many potential benefits to justice-involved adults reentering the community. In 2015 Indiana's Section 1115 Medicaid waiver (the Healthy Indiana Plan [HIP]) expanded eligibility for low-income adults. To expedite coverage for justice-involved adults, Indiana subsequently improved interagency coordination in two ways. First, the Indiana Department of Correction began initiating Medicaid applications for those in custody. Second, Medicaid began temporarily suspending coverage for people while they were incarcerated instead of discontinuing it. Prison release data from the Indiana Department of Correction linked to Medicaid enrollment data indicate that before HIP was implemented, approximately 9 percent of justice-involved adults received Medicaid coverage within 120 days of release. After HIP implementation, coverage rates increased by 9 percentage points. After both interagency coordination policies were implemented, an additional 29-percentage-point increase in coverage occurred. Furthermore, coverage effective within seven days of release increased by 14 percentage points after the interagency coordination policies went into effect. These findings support the notion that policies and procedures encouraging interagency coordination are beneficial in increasing timely access to Medicaid coverage for justice-involved people.

Age-specific incidence of injury-related hospital contact after release from prison: a prospective data-linkage study

Background

In population studies, the risk of injury declines after early adulthood. It is unclear if a similar age difference in the risk of injury exists among people released from prison.

Methods

Prerelease survey data collected between 1 August 2008 and 31 July 2010, from a representative cohort of sentenced adults (≥18 years) in Queensland, Australia, were linked prospectively and retrospectively to person-level emergency department, inpatient hospital and correctional records. To ascertain predictors of injury-related hospital contact, we fit a multivariate Andersen-Gill model and tested the interactions between age group (<25 years, ≥25 years) and each variable.

Results

In 1307 adults released from prison, there were 3804 person-years of follow-up. The crude injury rate was 385 (95% CI 364 to 407) per 1000 person-years and did not differ according to age group. Factors associated with increased injury-related hospital contact included a history of mental illness, preincarceration injury, a history of incarceration, release from a short prison sentence (<90 days), being reincarcerated during follow-up and identifying as Indigenous. The effect of mental illness, risky alcohol use, prior incarceration and intellectual disability differed across age group and predicted increased risk of injury among people aged ≥25 years compared with their counterparts without these characteristics.

Conclusions

Unlike in the general population where the risk of injury declines with age, older adults released from prison are at similar risk compared with their younger peers. Adults released from prison with mental illness, a history of injury-related hospital contact and who identify as Indigenous are particularly indicated groups for injury prevention.