Outcomes following early parenteral nutrition use in preterm neonates: protocol for an observational study

Use of parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week in England and Wales: an observational study using real-world data

BACKGROUND

Parenteral nutrition (PN) is used to provide supplemental support to neonates while enteral feeding is being established. PN is a high-cost intervention with beneficial and harmful effects. Internationally, there is substantial variation in how PN is used, and there are limited contemporary data describing use across Great Britain.

OBJECTIVE

To describe PN use in the first postnatal week in infants born and admitted to neonatal care in England, Scotland and Wales.

METHOD

Data describing neonates admitted to National Health Service neonatal units between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017, extracted from routinely recorded data held the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD); the denominator was live births, from Office for National Statistics.

RESULTS

Over the study period 62 145 neonates were given PN in the first postnatal week (1.4% of all live births); use was higher in more preterm neonates (76% of livebirths at <28 weeks, 0.2% of term livebirths) and in neonates with lower birth weight. 15% (9181/62145) of neonates given PN in the first postnatal week were born at term. There was geographic variation in PN administration: the proportion of live births given PN within neonatal regional networks ranged from 1.0% (95% CIs 1.0 to 1.0) to 2.8% (95% CI 2.7 to 2.9).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Significant variation exists in neonatal PN use; it is unlikely this reflects optimal use of an expensive intervention. Research is needed to identify which babies will benefit most and which are at risk of harm from early PN.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03767634; registration date: 6 December 2018.

Outcomes in relation to early parenteral nutrition use in preterm neonates born between 30 and 33 weeks' gestation: a propensity score matched observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether in preterm neonates parenteral nutrition use in the first 7 postnatal days, compared with no parenteral nutrition use, is associated with differences in survival and other important morbidities. Randomised trials in critically ill older children show that harms, such as nosocomial infection, outweigh benefits of early parenteral nutrition administration; there is a paucity of similar data in neonates.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using propensity matching including 35 maternal, infant and organisational factors to minimise bias and confounding.

SETTING

National, population-level clinical data obtained for all National Health Service neonatal units in England and Wales.

PATIENTS

Preterm neonates born between 30⁺⁰ and 32⁺⁶ weeks^+days.

INTERVENTIONS

The exposure was parenteral nutrition administered in the first 7 days of postnatal life; the comparator was no parenteral nutrition.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was survival to discharge from neonatal care. Secondary outcomes comprised the neonatal core outcome set.

RESULTS

16 292 neonates were compared in propensity score matched analyses. Compared with matched neonates not given parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week, neonates who received parenteral nutrition had higher survival at discharge (absolute rate increase 0.91%; 95% CI 0.53% to 1.30%), but higher rates of necrotising enterocolitis (absolute rate increase 4.6%), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (absolute rate increase 3.9%), late-onset sepsis (absolute rate increase 1.5%) and need for surgical procedures (absolute rate increase 0.92%).

CONCLUSIONS

In neonates born between 30⁺⁰ and 32⁺⁶ weeks' gestation, those given parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week had a higher rate of survival but higher rates of important neonatal morbidities. Clinician equipoise in this area should be resolved by prospective randomised trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03767634.