Adaptive deep brain stimulation as advanced Parkinson's disease treatment (ADAPT study): protocol for a pseudo-randomised clinical study

Alternative patterns of deep brain stimulation in neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used clinical therapy that modulates neuronal firing in subcortical structures, eliciting downstream network effects. Its effectiveness is determined by electrode geometry and location as well as adjustable stimulation parameters including pulse width, interstimulus interval, frequency, and amplitude. These parameters are often determined empirically during clinical or intraoperative programming and can be altered to an almost unlimited number of combinations. Conventional high-frequency stimulation uses a continuous high-frequency square-wave pulse (typically 130-160 Hz), but other stimulation patterns may prove efficacious, such as continuous or bursting theta-frequencies, variable frequencies, and coordinated reset stimulation. Here we summarize the current landscape and potential clinical applications for novel stimulation patterns.

Toward therapeutic electrophysiology: beta-band suppression as a biomarker in chronic local field potential recordings

Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a promising concept for feedback-based neurostimulation, with the potential of clinical implementation with the sensing-enabled Percept neurostimulator. We aim to characterize chronic electrophysiological activity during stimulation and to validate beta-band activity as a biomarker for bradykinesia. Subthalamic activity was recorded during stepwise stimulation amplitude increase OFF medication in 10 Parkinson's patients during rest and finger tapping. Offline analysis of wavelet-transformed beta-band activity and assessment of inter-variable relationships in linear mixed effects models were implemented. There was a stepwise suppression of low-beta activity with increasing stimulation intensity (p = 0.002). Low-beta power was negatively correlated with movement speed and predictive for velocity improvements (p < 0.001), stimulation amplitude for beta suppression (p < 0.001). Here, we characterize beta-band modulation as a chronic biomarker for motor performance. Our investigations support the use of electrophysiology in therapy optimization, providing evidence for the use of biomarker analysis for clinical aDBS.

Adaptive deep brain stimulation: Retuning Parkinson's disease

A brain-machine interface represents a promising therapeutic avenue for the treatment of many neurologic conditions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive, neuro-modulatory tool that can improve different neurologic disorders by delivering electric stimulation to selected brain areas. DBS is particularly successful in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), where it allows sustained improvement of motor symptoms. However, this approach is still poorly standardized, with variable clinical outcomes. To achieve an optimal therapeutic effect, novel adaptive DBS (aDBS) systems are being developed. These devices operate by adapting stimulation parameters in response to an input signal that can represent symptoms, motor activity, or other behavioral features. Emerging evidence suggests greater efficacy with fewer adverse effects during aDBS compared with conventional DBS. We address this topic by discussing the basics principles of aDBS, reviewing current evidence, and tackling the many challenges posed by aDBS for PD.

Double-blind cross-over pilot trial protocol to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of long-term adaptive deep brain stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

After several years of brain-sensing technology development and proof-of-concept studies, adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is ready to better treat Parkinson's disease (PD) using aDBS-capable implantable pulse generators (IPGs). New aDBS devices are capable of continuous sensing of neuronal activity from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and contemporaneous stimulation automatically adapted to match the patient's clinical state estimated from the analysis of STN activity using proprietary algorithms. Specific studies are necessary to assess superiority of aDBS vs conventional DBS (cDBS) therapy. This protocol describes an original innovative multicentre international study aimed to assess safety and efficacy of aDBS vs cDBS using a new generation of DBS IPG in PD (AlphaDBS system by Newronika SpA, Milan, Italy).

METHODS

The study involves six investigational sites (in Italy, Poland and The Netherlands). The primary objective will be to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the AlphaDBS System, when used in cDBS and aDBS mode. Secondary objective will be to evaluate the potential efficacy of aDBS. After eligibility screening, 15 patients with PD already implanted with DBS systems and in need of battery replacement will be randomised to enter a two-phase protocol, including a 'short-term follow-up' (2 days experimental sessions during hospitalisation, 1 day per each mode) and a 'long-term follow-up' (1 month at home, 15 days per each mode).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was approved as premarket study by the Italian, Polish, and Dutch Competent Authorities: Bioethics Committee at National Oncology Institute of Maria Skłodowska-Curie-National Research Institute in Warsaw; Comitato Etico Milano Area 2; Comitato Etico IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta; Comitato Etico interaziendale AOUC Città della Salute e della Scienza-AO Ordine Mauriziano di Torino-ASL Città di Torino; De Medisch Ethisch Toetsingscommissie van Maastricht UMC. The study started enrolling patients in January 2021.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04681534.

Differential Effects of Pathological Beta Burst Dynamics Between Parkinson's Disease Phenotypes Across Different Movements

Background: Resting state beta band (13-30 Hz) oscillations represent pathological neural activity in Parkinson's disease (PD). It is unknown how the peak frequency or dynamics of beta oscillations may change among fine, limb, and axial movements and different disease phenotypes. This will be critical for the development of personalized closed loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) algorithms during different activity states. Methods: Subthalamic (STN) and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded from a sensing neurostimulator (Activa® PC + S, Medtronic PLC.) in fourteen PD participants (six tremor-dominant and eight akinetic-rigid) off medication/off STN DBS during 30 s of repetitive alternating finger tapping, wrist-flexion extension, stepping in place, and free walking. Beta power peaks and beta burst dynamics were identified by custom algorithms and were compared among movement tasks and between tremor-dominant and akinetic-rigid groups. Results: Beta power peaks were evident during fine, limb, and axial movements in 98% of movement trials; the peak frequencies were similar during each type of movement. Burst power and duration were significantly larger in the high beta band, but not in the low beta band, in the akinetic-rigid group compared to the tremor-dominant group. Conclusion: The conservation of beta peak frequency during different activity states supports the feasibility of patient-specific closed loop DBS algorithms driven by the dynamics of the same beta band during different activities. Akinetic-rigid participants had greater power and longer burst durations in the high beta band than tremor-dominant participants during movement, which may relate to the difference in underlying pathophysiology between phenotypes.

The Relationship Between Electrical Energy Delivered by Deep Brain Stimulation and Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesias in Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Preliminary Analysis

Background: Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) is now considered as a new feasible and effective paradigm to deliver DBS to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in such a way that not only stimulation is personalized and finely tuned to the instantaneous patient's state, but also motor improvement is obtained with a lower amount of energy transferred to the tissue. Amplitude-controlled aDBS was shown to significantly decrease the amplitude-driven total electrical energy delivered to the tissue (aTEED), an objective measure of the amount of energy transferred by DBS amplitude to the patient's brain. However, there is no direct evidence of a relationship between aTEED and the occurrence of DBS-related adverse events in humans.

Objective: In this work, we investigated the correlation of aTEED with the occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesias pooling all the data available from our previous experiments using aDBS and cDBS.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data coming from 19 patients with PD undergoing surgery for STN-DBS electrode positioning and participating to experiments involving cDBS and aDBS delivery. Patients were all studied some days after the surgery (acute setting). The aTEED and dyskinesia assessments (Rush Dyskinesia Rating Scale, RDRS) considered in the Med ON-Stim ON condition.

Results: We confirmed both that aTEED values and RDRS were significantly lower in the aDBS than in cDBS sessions (aTEED mean value, cDBS: 0.0278 ± 0.0011 j, vs. aDBS: 0.0071 ± 0.0003 j, p < 0.0001 Wilcoxon's rank sum; normalized RDRS mean score, cDBS: 0.66 ± 0.017 vs. aDBS: 0.45 ± 0.01, p = 0.025, Wilcoxon's rank sum test). In addition, we found a direct significant correlation between aTEED and RDRS (ρ = 0.44, p = 0.0032, Spearman's correlation).

Conclusions: Our results provide a first piece of evidence that aTEED is correlated to the amount of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in patients with PD undergoing STN-DBS, thus supporting the role of aDBS as feasible and safe alternative to cDBS.

The Expanding Horizon of Neural Stimulation for Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders

Novel methods of neural stimulation are transforming the management of hyperkinetic movement disorders. In this review the diversity of approach available is showcased. We first describe the most commonly used features that can be extracted from oscillatory activity of the central nervous system, and how these can be combined with an expanding range of non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation techniques. We then shift our focus to the periphery using tremor and Tourette's syndrome to illustrate the utility of peripheral biomarkers and interventions. Finally, we discuss current innovations which are changing the landscape of stimulation strategy by integrating technological advances and the use of machine learning to drive optimization.

Eight cylindrical contact lead recordings in the subthalamic region localize beta oscillations source to the dorsal STN

BACKGROUND

In Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has prominent oscillatory activity in the beta band, which may be related to the motor symptoms severity. Local field potential (LFP) studies using standard four-contact deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads indicate that the source of beta activity in the STN region is the dorsolateral segment of the nucleus. However, these leads have few contacts outside of the STN, making the source localization of beta activity around the STN region uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiological characteristics of the STN and the surrounding area in PD to better locate the source of these oscillations and their clinical relevance.

METHODS

Eight PD patients were bilaterally implanted in the STN with the eight ring-contact DBS lead (Boston Scientific Corporation). LFPs were recorded intra-operatively from each DBS contact in the off medication state at rest. Each contact location was normalized relative to the STN borders based on microelectrode recordings. For each recording, power spectral density was computed, averaged over multiple frequency bands and phase reversal analysis was used to localize the source of oscillatory activity. Beta burst, high-frequency activity (HFA), and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) were also computed. Neurophysiological signatures were correlated with hemibody symptoms severity and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Beta band power and phase reversal localized the beta oscillator to the dorsal STN and correlated with pre-operative off medication hemibody bradykinesia and rigidity score. The contact along the electrode with the largest beta oscillatory power co-localized with the independently chosen optimized contact used for long-term chronic DBS. Lastly, beta bursting, HFA, and Beta-HFA PAC co-localized with the beta oscillator at the dorsal STN, and Beta-HFA PAC correlated with DBS effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the hypothesis that the primary source of beta oscillations is located in dorsal STN, and argue against the alternative hypothesis that beta activity in the STN region arises from volume conduction from other sources. We demonstrate intrinsic STN beta-HFA PAC as an independent marker of DBS effect.

Acute effects of adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Background

Beta-based adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) is effective in Parkinson’s disease (PD), when assessed in the immediate post-implantation phase. However, the potential benefits of aDBS in patients with electrodes chronically implanted, in whom changes due to the microlesion effect have disappeared, are yet to be assessed.

Methods

To determine the acute effectiveness and side-effect profile of aDBS in PD compared to conventional continuous DBS (cDBS) and no stimulation (NoStim), years after DBS implantation, 13 PD patients undergoing battery replacement were pseudo-randomised in a crossover fashion, into three conditions (NoStim, aDBS or cDBS), with a 2-min interval between them. Patient videos were blindly evaluated using a short version of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (subUPDRS), and the Speech Intelligibility Test (SIT).

Results

Mean disease duration was 16 years, and the mean time since DBS-implantation was 6.9 years. subUPDRS scores (11 patients tested) were significantly lower both in aDBS (p = <.001), and cDBS (p = .001), when compared to NoStim. Bradykinesia subscores were significantly lower in aDBS (p = .002), and did not achieve significance during cDBS (p = .08), when compared to NoStim. Two patients demonstrated re-emerging tremor during aDBS. SIT scores of patients who presented stimulation-induced dysarthria significantly worsened in cDBS (p = .009), but not in aDBS (p = .407), when compared to NoStim. Overall, stimulation was applied 48.8% of the time during aDBS.

Conclusion

Beta-based aDBS is effective in PD patients with bradykinetic phenotypes, delivers less stimulation than cDBS, and potentially has a more favourable speech side-effect profile. Patients with prominent tremor may require a modified adaptive strategy.

A novel method for calculating beta band burst durations in Parkinson's disease using a physiological baseline

BACKGROUND

Pathologically prolonged bursts of neural activity in the 8-30 Hz frequency range in Parkinson's disease have been measured using high power event detector thresholds.

NEW METHOD

This study introduces a novel method for determining beta bursts using a power baseline based on spectral activity that overlapped a simulated 1/f spectrum. We used resting state local field potentials from people with Parkinson's disease and a simulated 1/f signal to measure beta burst durations, to demonstrate how tuning parameters (i.e., bandwidth and center frequency) affect burst durations, to compare burst duration distributions with high power threshold methods, and to study the effect of increasing neurostimulation intensities on burst duration.

RESULTS

The baseline method captured a broad distribution of resting state beta band burst durations. Mean beta band burst durations were significantly shorter on compared to off neurostimulation (p = 0.0046), and their distribution shifted towards that of the 1/f spectrum during increasing intensities of stimulation.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

High power event detection methods, measure duration of higher power bursts and omit portions of the neural signal. The baseline method captured the broadest distribution of burst durations and was more sensitive than high power detection methods in demonstrating the effect of neurostimulation on beta burst duration.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline method captured a broad range of fluctuations in beta band neural activity and demonstrated that subthalamic neurostimulation shortened burst durations in a dose (intensity) dependent manner, suggesting that beta burst duration is a useful control variable for closed loop algorithms.

Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology

The Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Think Tank held on September 8th of 2019 addressed the most current: (1) use and utility of complex neurophysiological signals for development of adaptive neurostimulation to improve clinical outcomes; (2) Advancements in recent neuromodulation techniques to treat neuropsychiatric disorders; (3) New developments in optogenetics and DBS; (4) The use of augmented Virtual reality (VR) and neuromodulation; (5) commercially available technologies; and (6) ethical issues arising in and from research and use of DBS. These advances serve as both "markers of progress" and challenges and opportunities for ongoing address, engagement, and deliberation as we move to improve the functional capabilities and translational value of DBS. It is in this light that these proceedings are presented to inform the field and initiate ongoing discourse. As consistent with the intent, and spirit of this, and prior DBS Think Tanks, the overarching goal is to continue to develop multidisciplinary collaborations to rapidly advance the field and ultimately improve patient outcomes.