1
|
Silvester L, Higo A, Kearney RS, McWilliams D, Palmer S. Key components of rehabilitation programmes for adults with complex fractures following traumatic injury: A scoping review. Injury 2024; 55:111801. [PMID: 39128165 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Complex fractures are severe injuries that cause considerable disability, particularly in the working population. Effective rehabilitation is essential to achieve good outcomes, however, it is unclear what the best rehabilitation strategy is for adults with complex fractures, after their discharge from hospital. The aim of this scoping review was to identify and map the breadth of evidence available on this topic. METHODS A systematic search was completed on 24th July 2023 using a combination of subject and specialist databases. In addition, a secondary search assessed unpublished literature from trial registries. A citation search was completed on the selected studies. The template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to extract consistent data on the interventions reported in the studies. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was followed. RESULTS 19,253 studies were identified from the search strategy of which 25 studies met the eligibility criteria. Most interventions were exercise-based and delivered by physiotherapists. Some studies compared manual therapy treatments to other forms of physiotherapy or a placebo, whilst others investigated psychosocial interventions, such as cognitive behavioural therapy, in comparison to usual care. Two studies took a multidisciplinary team approach, incorporating components such as exercise, functional activities and self-management strategies. DISCUSSION The studies included were heterogenous in terms of population (fracture type, location and complexity), intervention content and therapeutic aims. However, commonalities were found with most interventions or comparators including range of movement, strengthening and task specific exercises; functional tasks; gait and balance training; and advice on return to activities as components. Value was attributed to components such as, a coordinated team approach, person-centred rehabilitation, supervised exercise and psychosocial support. CONCLUSION There is a broad and varied approach to the rehabilitation of complex fractures. The studies differed in population and approach, with a wide range of injuries, interventions and modes of delivery reported. Fidelity was poorly described, with only a third of studies reporting adherence or acceptability. There was inconclusive evidence to inform clinical practice and further research is advised. Qualitative, expert consensus, and coproduction approaches are recommended methods to develop complex interventions and best practice guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Silvester
- Institute for Applied & Translational Technologies in Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom.
| | - Anna Higo
- Research Centre for Healthcare & Communities, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca S Kearney
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 1NU, United Kingdom
| | - David McWilliams
- Centre for Care Excellence, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
| | - Shea Palmer
- School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YU, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bretherton CP, Kotwal T, Sandhu H, Baird J, Griffin XL. Patient experiences and desires for recovery after ankle fracture surgery. Injury 2024; 55:111763. [PMID: 39106533 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigates patients' experiences of commencing weight-bearing after ankle fracture surgery and their recovery priorities to inform a new rehabilitation intervention. METHODS Embedded within the Weight bearing in Ankle Fractures (WAX) trial, this qualitative study conducted semi-structured interviews with patients following ankle fracture surgery. The Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) framework guided the interview questions to ensure comprehensive domain coverage. A purposive, maximum variation sampling strategy was used for participant selection. Data analysis employed a combined deductive and inductive approach. RESULTS A total of 29 patients were interviewed, revealing five key themes: understanding the recovery journey, navigating the healthcare system, understanding personal physical capabilities, building confidence for weight-bearing, and resuming daily activities. Themes emphasised the variability in healthcare access, the impact of non-weight-bearing on independence, and the role of self-efficacy in recovery. CONCLUSIONS The study highlighted the diversity in patient experiences and recovery challenges post-ankle fracture surgery. Patients' recovery was influenced by access to consistent healthcare advice, self-efficacy, and the physical and psychological impact of non-weight-bearing. The findings suggest a need for tailored, patient-centred rehabilitation interventions that consider individual recovery trajectories and promote self-management. These insights provide a foundational understanding for developing interventions that more effectively address patient priorities and barriers to recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Bretherton
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom.
| | - Tejas Kotwal
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom
| | - Harbinder Sandhu
- Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
| | - Janis Baird
- Centre for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
| | - Xavier L Griffin
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, 4 Newark Street, London, E1 2AT, United Kingdom; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, E1 1BB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keene DJ, Achten J, Forde C, Png ME, Grant R, Draper K, Appelbe D, Tutton E, Peckham N, Dutton SJ, Lamb SE, Costa ML. Effectiveness of supervised versus self-directed rehabilitation for adults aged 50 years and over with ankle fractures: protocol for the AFTER trial. Bone Jt Open 2024; 5:499-513. [PMID: 38898823 PMCID: PMC11187601 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.56.bjo-2023-0183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Aims Ankle fractures are common, mainly affecting adults aged 50 years and over. To aid recovery, some patients are referred to physiotherapy, but referral patterns vary, likely due to uncertainty about the effectiveness of this supervised rehabilitation approach. To inform clinical practice, this study will evaluate the effectiveness of supervised versus self-directed rehabilitation in improving ankle function for older adults with ankle fractures. Methods This will be a multicentre, parallel-group, individually randomized controlled superiority trial. We aim to recruit 344 participants aged 50 years and older with an ankle fracture treated surgically or non-surgically from at least 20 NHS hospitals. Participants will be randomized 1:1 using a web-based service to supervised rehabilitation (four to six one-to-one physiotherapy sessions of tailored advice and prescribed home exercise over three months), or self-directed rehabilitation (provision of advice and exercise materials that participants will use to manage their recovery independently). The primary outcome is participant-reported ankle-related symptoms and function six months after randomization, measured by the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score. Secondary outcomes at two, four, and six months measure health-related quality of life, pain, physical function, self-efficacy, exercise adherence, complications, and resource use. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants and intervention providers will be unblinded to treatment allocation. Conclusion This study will assess whether supervised rehabilitation is more effective than self-directed rehabilitation for adults aged 50 years and older after ankle fracture. The results will provide evidence to guide clinical practice. At the time of submission, the trial is currently completing recruitment, and follow-up will be completed in 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Keene
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Juul Achten
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Colin Forde
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - May E. Png
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kylea Draper
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Duncan Appelbe
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas Peckham
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan J. Dutton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah E. Lamb
- Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Matthew L. Costa
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O'Hara NN, Gage MJ, Loudermilk C, Drogt C, Klazinga NS, Kringos DS, Mundy LR. Factors that Promote and Protect Against Financial Toxicity after Orthopaedic Trauma: A Qualitative Study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:e542-e557. [PMID: 38652885 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Financial toxicity is highly prevalent in patients after an orthopaedic injury. However, little is known regarding the conditions that promote and protect against this financial distress. Our objective was to understand the factors that cause and protect against financial toxicity after a lower extremity fracture. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 patients 3 months after surgical treatment of a lower extremity fracture. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Data saturation occurred after 15 interviews. The percentage of patients who described the identified themes are reported. RESULTS A total of 20 patients (median age, 44 years [IQR, 38 to 58]; 60% male) participated in the study. The most common injury was a distal tibia fracture (n = 8; 40%). Eleven themes that promoted financial distress were identified, the most common being work effects (n = 14; 70%) and emotional health (n = 12; 60%). Over half (n = 11; 55%) of participants described financial toxicity arising from an inability to access social welfare programs. Seven themes that protected against financial distress were also identified, including insurance (n = 17; 85%) and support from friends and family (n = 17; 85%). Over half (n = 13; 65%) of the participants discussed the support they received from their healthcare team, which encompassed expectation setting and connections to financial aid and other services. Employment protection and workplace flexibility were additional protective themes. CONCLUSION This qualitative study of orthopaedic trauma patients found work and emotional health-related factors to be primary drivers of financial toxicity after injury. Insurance and support from friends and family were the most frequently reported protective factors. Many participants described the pivotal role of the healthcare team in establishing recovery expectations and facilitating access to social welfare programs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wake E, Ranse J, Campbell D, Gabbe B, Marshall AP. Follow-up after major traumatic injury: a survey of services in Australian and New Zealand public hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:630. [PMID: 38750458 PMCID: PMC11097478 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11105-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased survival from traumatic injury has led to a higher demand for follow-up care when patients are discharged from hospital. It is currently unclear how follow-up care following major trauma is provided to patients, and how, when, and to whom follow-up services are delivered. The aim of this study was to describe the current follow-up care provided to patients and their families who have experienced major traumatic injury in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHODS Informed by Donabedian's 'Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care' model and the Institute of Medicine's Six Domains of Healthcare Quality, a cross-sectional online survey was developed in conjunction with trauma experts. Their responses informed the final survey which was distributed to key personnel in 71 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand that (i) delivered trauma care to patients, (ii) provided data to the Australasian Trauma Registry, or (iii) were a Trauma Centre. RESULTS Data were received from 38/71 (53.5%) hospitals. Most were Level 1 trauma centres (n = 23, 60.5%); 76% (n = 16) follow-up services were permanently funded. Follow-up services were led by a range of health professionals with over 60% (n = 19) identifying as trauma specialists. Patient inclusion criteria varied; only one service allowed self-referral (3.3%). Follow-up was within two weeks of acute care discharge in 53% (n = 16) of services. Care activities focused on physical health; psychosocial assessments were the least common. Most services provided care for adults and paediatric trauma (60.5%, n = 23); no service incorporated follow-up for family members. Evaluation of follow-up care was largely as part of a health service initiative; only three sites stated evaluation was specific to trauma follow-up. CONCLUSION Follow-up care is provided by trauma specialists and predominantly focuses on the physical health of the patients affected by major traumatic injury. Variations exist in terms of patient selection, reason for follow-up and care activities delivered with gaps in the provision of psychosocial and family health services identified. Currently, evaluation of trauma follow-up care is limited, indicating a need for further development to ensure that the care delivered is safe, effective and beneficial to patients, families and healthcare organisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Wake
- Trauma Service, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Jamie Ranse
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Don Campbell
- Trauma Service, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Belinda Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrea P Marshall
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
- Midwifery Education and Research Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Nursing, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lari A, Haidar A, Mohammad H, Makhseed M, Alajmi M, Bahbahani R, Almutairi M, Alnusif N, Lari E. The association between lower limb fractures and weight gain in adults: a prospective analysis of body mass index trends. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024; 34:1563-1569. [PMID: 38300306 PMCID: PMC10980615 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03832-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite understanding the connection between obesity and fracture risk, there is limited research on the implications of lower limb fractures on subsequent changes in body mass index (BMI). Our study aimed to assess the impact of lower limb fractures on BMI alterations over an 18-month period. METHODS A multi-center, prospective cohort study was conducted between January 2021 to June 2023, involving 494 adults with lower limb fractures. Participants were recruited within 2 weeks post-injury and were assessed for demographics, injury details, and weight at seven distinct time points. By 18 months, the primary outcome was the mean weight gain. RESULTS The average age of the participants was 39 (± 12.7) with a baseline weight and BMI of 80.4 kg and 27.6, respectively. At the 18-month follow-up, 75% of patients experienced an average weight increase in 4 kg (± 5.39 kg), equating to a BMI rise of 1.39 (± 1.88). Most patients attributed weight changes to their injury, with nearly half expressing distress from their weight change. Only 37% believed that they had resumed their previous activity levels by the final follow-up. Approximately 31% of the patients sought some form of external weight management care in the form of nutritionist advice, training programs, medication and weight management procedures. CONCLUSIONS Lower limb fractures significantly affect weight gain over an 18-month period, with substantial psychological and physical consequences. Healthcare providers should anticipate potential weight gain post-fracture and incorporate strategies addressing both physical and mental aspects of rehabilitation to enhance recovery outcomes. Early and even immediate weight bearing may play a pivotal role in mitigating weight changes and returning the patient to their previous level of activity. Further detailed studies focusing on different fractures and postoperative interventions are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Lari
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
| | - Abdullah Haidar
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mubarak Al Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Hussain Mohammad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mohammad Makhseed
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mejbel Alajmi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jaber Al Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Retaj Bahbahani
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | | | - Naser Alnusif
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, AlRazi National Orthopedic Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Eisa Lari
- Department of Surgery, Jaber Al Ahmad Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yim GH, Pikturnaite J, Harry L, Clement R, Pope-Jones S, Emam A, Marsden N. Enhanced recovery for acute open lower limb fracture 'fix and flap'. Injury 2024; 55:111234. [PMID: 38029681 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Enhanced recovery (ER) aims to achieve earlier recovery, reduced hospital length of stay (LoS) whilst improving outcomes. Our ER protocol for acute lower-limb open fracture (ALLOFs) includes dangling at day 3 and mobilising fully weight-bearing from day 5. Our aims were to evaluate the outcomes of ALLOFs using our ER protocol for limb salvage, LoS following 'fix & flap', return to theatre, rate of successful flap salvage, flap failure and deep infection rates. METHODS An observational study of a prospectively maintained lower limb flap database from September 2020 to January 2023 was undertaken. Search criteria encompassed patients with a Gustilo IIIB/C injury and a free flap reconstruction. Exclusions were for local/perforator flaps, soft tissue injury only, fracture related/prosthetic joint infections, or chronic osteomyelitis cases. RESULTS 161 patients were available for analysis, 126 male (78 %) and 35 female (22 %) with a median age of 40 years (12-79, interquartile range 30.0). 81 % of cases were high-energy injuries. For all patients, the median time to definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage from injury was 4 days (0-30, interquartile range 2). 18 cases (11.2 %) required return to theatre for flap exploration; 11 cases were successfully salvaged (61 %). Nine free flaps failed (5.4 %). The median total LoS from admission was 10 days (6 to 46, interquartile range 5), with a median LoS following definitive fixation and soft tissue coverage of 7 days (4 to 20, interquartile range 3). The median follow-up period was 18 months (12 to 38.2, interquartile range 9), with a deep infection rate of 6.5 %. CONCLUSION In isolated ALLOFs, our ER protocol is safe and effective in shortening the LoS. Our outcomes sit comfortably within acceptable ranges of contemporary literature for return to theatre, flap salvage/failure and deep infection. Our ER protocol actively involves our allied health professional colleagues early to facilitate discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Hua Yim
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
| | - Jurga Pikturnaite
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine Harry
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
| | - Rhys Clement
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Orthopaedic department, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Pope-Jones
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Emam
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Marsden
- The Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastics, Morriston Hospital, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston SA6 6NL, Swansea, United Kingdom; Major Trauma Centre, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aquilina AL, Claireaux H, Aquilina CO, Tutton E, Fitzpatrick R, Costa ML, Griffin XL. The core outcomes for open lower limb fracture study. Bone Joint Res 2023; 12:352-361. [PMID: 37257859 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.126.bjr-2022-0280.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims A core outcome set for adult, open lower limb fracture has been established consisting of 'Walking, gait and mobility', 'Being able to return to life roles', 'Pain or discomfort', and 'Quality of life'. This study aims to identify which outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) should be recommended to measure each core outcome. Methods A systematic review and quality assessment were conducted to identify existing instruments with evidence of good measurement properties in the open lower limb fracture population for each core outcome. Additionally, shortlisting criteria were developed to identify suitable instruments not validated in the target population. Candidate instruments were presented, discussed, and voted on at a consensus meeting of key stakeholders. Results The Wales Lower Limb Trauma Recovery scale was identified, demonstrating validation evidence in the target population. In addition, ten candidate OMIs met the shortlisting criteria. Six patients, eight healthcare professionals, and 11 research methodologists attended the consensus meeting. Consensus was achieved for the EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) to measure 'Quality of life' and 'Walking, gait and mobility' in future research trials, audit, and clinical assessment, respectively. No instrument met consensus criteria to measure 'Being able to return to life roles' and 'Pain or discomfort'. However, the EQ-5D-5L was found to demonstrate good face validity and could also be used pragmatically to measure these two outcomes, accepting limitations in sensitivity. Conclusion This study recommends the LEFS and EQ-5D-5L to measure the core outcome set for adult open lower limb fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Aquilina
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Harry Claireaux
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ray Fitzpatrick
- University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew L Costa
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Xavier L Griffin
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bodrova RA, Petrova RV, Delyan AM, Preobrazhenskaya EV, Nikolaev NS, Gumarova LS, Ivanov MI, Kamaleeva AR. A modern approach to the rehabilitation of patients with fractures of the bones of the lower extremities. PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, MEDICAL REHABILITATION 2023; 5:40-51. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.36425/rehab233510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: General injury rates tend to increase in most federal districts of Russia. The patients with fractures of the bones of the lower extremities reaches for 8.525% of the total number of patients with fractures. Fractures of the bones of the lower extremities are characterized by long period of reparation, persistent contractures, a violation of the congruence of the articular surfaces, and changes in the biomechanics of walking. Only full course of rehabilitation can eliminate the these complications and restore the previous motor activity.
АIMS: The study aimed to analyze the structure of injuries in patients of the traumatology department and to present and the results of the recovery of patients with fractures of the bones of the lower extremities using and algorithm of organization of medical rehabilitation in the case study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of statistical data on 995 patients of the traumatology department № 1 of the Kazan City Clinical Hospital, who underwent 981 operations, was carried out. Randomly selected two groups of patients ― I main (n=45) and II control (n=45). Patients of group II after the treatment at the trauma center underwent outpatient medical rehabilitation, group I received inpatient medical rehabilitation in the rehabilitation department of the Kazan City Clinical Hospital № 7. In a hospital setting, a comprehensive rehabilitation program included physiotherapy exercises, CPM-veloergometry, exercises on rehabilitation simulators, the PNF kinesiotherapy technique, etc.
RESULTS: A more pronounced statistically significant positive dynamics at the end of the course of medical rehabilitation was noted in patients of group I (reduction of pain syndrome, increased joint mobility, degree of dependence on others, increased mobility index, the ability to dress independently, maintain body position in space, reduced dysfunction in lifting and carrying objects, walking disorders, and caring for body parts). The dynamics of motor function and psycho-emotional sphere also improved to a greater extent in patients of group I.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of the presented algorithm of organization of medical rehabilitation of patients with fractures of the bones of the lower extremities is confirmed by the results of present study. It is revealed that patients in the I (main) group showed more significant improvement in functions, activity and participation, a decrease of disability, reduce of pain, anxiety and depression, as well as an increase of the level of quality of life compared to patients of group II (control), who did not receive comprehensive medical rehabilitation in the hospital (p 0.1).
Collapse
|
10
|
Pearson NA, Tutton E, Gwilym SE, Joeris A, Grant R, Keene DJ, Haywood KL. Understanding patient experience of distal tibia or ankle fracture: a qualitative systematic review. Bone Jt Open 2023; 4:188-197. [PMID: 37051834 PMCID: PMC10031546 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.43.bjo-2022-0115.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
To systematically review qualitative studies of patients with distal tibia or ankle fracture, and explore their experience of injury and recovery. We undertook a systematic review of qualitative studies. Five databases were searched from inception to 1 February 2022. All titles and abstracts were screened, and a subset were independently assessed. Methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The GRADE-CERQual checklist was used to assign confidence ratings. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze data with the identification of codes which were drawn together to form subthemes and then themes. From 2,682 records, 15 studies were reviewed in full and four included in the review. A total of 72 patients were included across the four studies (47 female; mean age 50 years (17 to 80)). Methodological quality was high for all studies, and the GRADE-CERQual checklist provided confidence that the findings were an adequate representation of patient experience of distal tibia or ankle fracture. A central concept of 'being the same but different' conveyed the substantial disruption to patients' self-identity caused by their injury. Patient experience of 'being the same but different' was expressed through three interrelated themes, with seven subthemes: i) being proactive where persistence, doing things differently and keeping busy prevailed; ii) living with change including symptoms, and living differently due to challenges at work and leisure; and iii) striving for normality, adapting while lacking in confidence, and feeling fearful and concerned about the future. Ankle injuries were disruptive, draining, and impacted on patients' wellbeing. Substantial short- and longer-term challenges were experienced during recovery. Rehabilitation and psychosocial treatment strategies may help to ameliorate these challenges. Patients may benefit from clinicians being cognisant of patient experience when assessing, treating, and discussing expectations and outcomes with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A Pearson
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Major Trauma Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen E Gwilym
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexander Joeris
- AO ITC, Clinical Science, AO Foundation, Strettbacherstrausse 6, 8600, Dubendorf, Switzerland
| | - Richard Grant
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, West Midlands; Warwick Medical School, User Teaching and Research Action Partnership; Fragility Fracture Network; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Keene
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kirstie L Haywood
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lindahl M, Juneja H. I'll be back - Predictive validity of adults' expectations for recovery after fractures - A longitudinal observational study. Injury 2023:S0020-1383(23)00246-2. [PMID: 36925373 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recovery after fractures due to accidents relates to all aspects of the biopsychosocial model. Therefore, it is difficult for the patients to foresee the consequences of the fractures. This study aimed to examine 1) patients' expectations regarding the impact of the injury on everyday life, 2) predictive validity of their expectations after six months, and 3) factors that predict a return to work. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were 18-64 years old and hospitalized with simple or compound/multiple fractures due to an accident. During admission, structured interviews were conducted with a questionnaire covering working conditions, expectations regarding recovery, sports, economy, family, household, and return to work. Additionally, mental and physical status were covered with Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA) and Short Form 36, and working conditions were uncovered too. After six months, telephonic interviews were conducted with the 164 available patients to elucidate the impact of the fractures on everyday life, their health status, and sick leave. Likelihood ratios, post-test probabilities, and logistic regression analysis were performed to establish if patients' expectations predicted recovery, economy, sports, family, household, and return to work. RESULTS Few patients' baseline expectations about everyday life were met. The likelihood ratios were small, and the post-test probabilities for expectations consistent with outcomes were between 18% and 68%, with recovery as the lowest and participation in sports as the highest. In the multivariate analysis, patients' expectations did not predict short-term (less than two months) or long-term sick leave (more than three months). Self-rated health and the bother index of SMFA were significant short-term and long-term predictors for sick leave. Additionally, vitality, pain, and decision latitude at work predicted sick leave of less than two months. CONCLUSION A few days after the accident, patients' expectations about everyday life are not associated with outcomes six months later. Likelihood ratios indicate difficulties for the patients in predicting fractures' consequences on various aspects of everyday life. Return to work was associated with self-rated health and the bother index of SMFA. Future research should examine if fracture patients can benefit from comprehensive, individual counseling during admission to set appropriate expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Lindahl
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Slagelse, Denmark.
| | - Hemant Juneja
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Slagelse, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tutton E, Gould J, Lamb SE, Costa ML, Keene DJ. 'It Makes Me Feel Old': Understanding the Experience of Recovery From Ankle Fracture at 6 Months in People Aged 50 Years and Over. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2023; 33:308-320. [PMID: 36745107 PMCID: PMC10061622 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231153605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Ankle fracture is a common injury, and depending on injury severity, treatment may be a support boot, cast or surgery. Older people, particularly those with severe injuries who are asked to restrict weight bearing, struggle with early recovery. To elicit older peoples' experience of recovery 6 months after injury, we drew on a phenomenological approach using interviews. Findings revealed that getting on with life was a way of accepting what it feels like to 'be vulnerable', needing to 'be safe' while determinedly working hard to 'be myself'. Being vulnerable identified endurance of inactivity, loneliness and dependency in the non-weight bearing period of recovery, followed by a struggle to weight bear while lacking confidence and being fearful of falling and causing further damage. Being safe conveyed fragility where sensations, pain and stiffness acted as bodily reminders of injury. Lack of function and awareness of danger led to carefulness where planning or curtailing of activities ensured their safety. Being myself showed a determination to push away from a disrupted self-identify of being older or disabled while being challenged by the continuous process of learning to be more mobile. A lack of readiness for old age created a drive to age well. Despite loss of ability, participants hoped to regain their pre-injury way of living. This study challenges practice that disregards the hard work required to recover from ankle fracture. As comorbidity increases with age, failure to consider this aspect may contribute to frailty in this group of older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Tutton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Major Trauma Centre, Oxford UniversityHospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jenny Gould
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah E. Lamb
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Matthew L. Costa
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J. Keene
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aquilina AL, Claireaux H, Aquilina CO, Tutton E, Fitzpatrick R, Costa ML, Griffin XL. What outcomes have been reported on patients following open lower limb fracture, and how have they been measured? Bone Joint Res 2023; 12:138-146. [PMID: 37051811 PMCID: PMC10003018 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.122.bjr-2022-0116.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Open lower limb fracture is a life-changing injury affecting 11.5 per 100,000 adults each year, and causes significant morbidity and resource demand on trauma infrastructures. This study aims to identify what, and how, outcomes have been reported for people following open lower limb fracture over ten years. Systematic literature searches identified all clinical studies reporting outcomes for adults following open lower limb fracture between January 2009 and July 2019. All outcomes and outcome measurement instruments were extracted verbatim. An iterative process was used to group outcome terms under standardized outcome headings categorized using an outcome taxonomy. A total of 532 eligible studies were identified, reporting 1,803 outcomes with 786 unique outcome terms, which collapsed to 82 standardized outcome headings. Overall 479 individual outcome measurement instruments were identified, including 298 outcome definitions, 27 patient- and 18 clinician-reported outcome measures, and six physical performance measures. The most-reported outcome was 'bone union/healing' reported in over 50% of included studies, while health-related quality of life was only measured in 6% of included studies. Outcomes reported for people recovering from open lower limb fracture are heterogeneous, liable to outcome reporting bias, and vary widely in the definitions and the measurement tools used to collect them. Outcomes likely to be important to patients, such as quality of life and measures of physical functioning, have been neglected. This systematic review identifies the need to unify outcome measures reported on patients recovering from open lower limb fracture; this may be addressed by creating a core outcome set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Aquilina
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Henry Claireaux
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christian O Aquilina
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Matthew L Costa
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Xavier L Griffin
- Bone and Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Limb salvage versus primary amputation in Gustilo-Anderson IIIB and IIIC tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023:10.1007/s00402-023-04804-2. [PMID: 36781435 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04804-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The last systematic review on this topic was published in 2008. With advances in surgical techniques, patients with mangled extremities may now be potentially salvageable with comparable outcomes. This review aims to evaluate the outcomes of limb salvage compared to primary amputation in patients with severe open tibial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL and CINAHL was performed from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate pain, patient preference, quality of life, and patient preferences. Methodological quality was evaluated using the MINORS criteria. Pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as a summary statistic for dichotomous variables and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS Sixteen studies with 645 patients met inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was moderate based on the MINORS score. The majority were male. Mean age was 36.3 years. There was no significant differences in the length of hospitalization (n = 8), return to work rates (n = 9), return to sport rates (n = 4) and quality of life scores (n = 4). Patients with primary amputation had a significantly lower risk of total complications (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53, p = 0.001) (n = 10), infections (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85, p = 0.01) (n = 9), and number of surgeries (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 6.49 to - 1.85, p = 0.0004) (n = 6). Patients with primary amputation were able to ambulate significantly earlier (MD - 4.06, 95% CI - 7.65 to - 0.46, p = 0.03) (n = 3). Three studies found a significantly higher cost of hospitalization in limb salvage patients. Functional outcomes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION While patients with primary amputation had better clinical outcomes in the short-term, functional outcomes were not significantly different in both groups. Despite the heterogenicity of the results in this review, surgeons need to contextualize the decision making for their patients and incorporate these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022303357.
Collapse
|
15
|
Su H, Zhong S, Ma T, Wu W, Lu Y, Wang D. Biomechanical study of the stiffness of the femoral locking compression plate of an external fixator for lower tibial fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:39. [PMID: 36650508 PMCID: PMC9847071 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06150-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A locking compression plate (LCP) of the distal femur is used as an external fixator for lower tibial fractures. However, in clinical practice, the technique lacks a standardized approach and a strong biomechanical basis for its stability. METHODS In this paper, internal tibial LCP fixator (Group IT-44), external tibial LCP fixator (Group ET-44), external distal femoral LCP fixator (Group EF-44, group EF-33, group EF-22), and conventional external fixator (Group CEF-22) frames were used to fix unstable fracture models of the lower tibial segment, and anatomical studies were performed to standardize the operation as well as to assess the biomechanical stability and adjustability of the distal femoral LCP external fixator by biomechanical experiments. RESULTS It was found that the torsional and flexural stiffnesses of group EF-44 and group EF-33 were higher than those of group IT-44 and group ET-44 (p < 0.05); the flexural stiffness of group EF-22 was similar to that of group IT-44 (p > 0.05); and the compressive stiffness of all three EF groups was higher than that of group ET-44 (p < 0.05). In addition, the flexural and compressive stiffnesses of the three EF groups decreased with the decrease in the number of screws (p < 0.05), while the torsional stiffness of the three groups did not differ significantly between the two adjacent groups (p > 0.05). Group CEF-22 showed the highest stiffnesses, while group ET-44 had the lowest stiffnesses (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The study shows that the distal femoral LCP has good biomechanical stability and adjustability and is superior to the tibial LCP as an external fixator for distal tibial fractures, as long as the technique is used in a standardized manner according to the anatomical studies in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Su
- grid.417409.f0000 0001 0240 6969Second Department of Orthopedics, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 1439, Zhufeng Avenue, Doumen District, Zhuhai, 519100 China
| | - Siyang Zhong
- grid.417409.f0000 0001 0240 6969Zunyi Medical University Zhuhai Campus, No. 368, Jinwan Road, Jinwan District, Zhuhai, 519041 China
| | - Tianyong Ma
- grid.417409.f0000 0001 0240 6969Second Department of Orthopedics, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 1439, Zhufeng Avenue, Doumen District, Zhuhai, 519100 China
| | - Weidong Wu
- grid.417409.f0000 0001 0240 6969Second Department of Orthopedics, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 1439, Zhufeng Avenue, Doumen District, Zhuhai, 519100 China
| | - Yihong Lu
- grid.417409.f0000 0001 0240 6969Second Department of Orthopedics, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 1439, Zhufeng Avenue, Doumen District, Zhuhai, 519100 China
| | - Dewei Wang
- grid.417409.f0000 0001 0240 6969Second Department of Orthopedics, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, No. 1439, Zhufeng Avenue, Doumen District, Zhuhai, 519100 China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pearson NA, Tutton E, Joeris A, Gwilym SE, Grant R, Keene DJ, Haywood KL. A systematic review of outcome reporting in clinical trials of distal tibia and ankle fractures. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3:832-840. [DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.310.bjo-2022-0080.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To describe outcome reporting variation and trends in non-pharmacological randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of distal tibia and/or ankle fractures. Methods Five electronic databases and three clinical trial registries were searched (January 2000 to February 2022). Trials including patients with distal tibia and/or ankle fractures without concomitant injuries were included. One reviewer conducted all searches, screened titles and abstracts, assessed eligibility, and completed data extraction; a random 10% subset were independently assessed and extracted by a second reviewer at each stage. All extracted outcomes were mapped to a modified version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. The quality of outcome reporting (reproducibility) was assessed. Results Overall, 105 trials (n = 16 to 669 participants) from 27 countries were included. Trials compared surgical interventions (n = 62), post-surgical management options (n = 17), rehabilitative interventions (n = 14), surgical versus non-surgical interventions (n = 6), and pre-surgical management strategies (n = 5). In total, 888 outcome assessments were reported across seven domains: 263 assessed body structure or function (85.7% of trials), 136 activities (68.6% of trials), 34 participation (23.8% of trials), 159 health-related quality of life (61.9% of trials), 247 processes of care (80% of trials), 21 patient experiences (15.2% of trials), and 28 economic impact (8.6% of trials). From these, 337 discrete outcomes were described. Outcome reporting was inconsistent across trials. The quality of reporting varied widely (reproducibility ranged 4.8% patient experience to 100% complications). Conclusion Substantial heterogeneity in outcome selection, assessment methods, and reporting quality were described. Despite the large number of outcomes, few are reported across multiple trials. Most outcomes are clinically focused, with little attention to the long-term consequences important to patients. Poor reporting quality reduces confidence in data quality, inhibiting data synthesis by which to inform care decisions. Outcome reporting guidance and standardization, which captures the outcomes that matter to multiple stakeholders, are urgently required. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):832–840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A. Pearson
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Kadoorie Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Stephen E. Gwilym
- Kadoorie Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Grant
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, West Midlands, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Musculoskeletal Patient and Public Involvement Group, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - David J. Keene
- Kadoorie Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Services, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kirstie L. Haywood
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Berner JE, Chan JKK, Gardiner MD, Navia A, Tejos R, Ortiz-Llorens M, Ortega-Briones A, Rakhorst HA, Nanchahal J, Jain A. International Lower Limb Collaborative (INTELLECT) study: a multicentre, international retrospective audit of lower extremity open fractures. Br J Surg 2022; 109:792-795. [PMID: 35470389 PMCID: PMC10364752 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Sixty-two centres in 16 countries contributed with 2,694 open fractures cases to an international, multi-centric, retrospective cohort study involving different healthcare settings. The INTELLECT study results show that there are significant disparities on the management of open lower limb fractures internationally. A timely, multidisciplinary, guideline-directed care is a protective factor for developing infective complications, non-union and requiring an amputation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Enrique Berner
- Correspondence to: Juan Enrique Berner, Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London E1 1FR, UK (e-mail: )
| | - James K K Chan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew D Gardiner
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UK
- Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alfonso Navia
- Sección de Cirugía Plástica y Reconstructiva, División de Cirugía. Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rodrigo Tejos
- Sección de Cirugía Plástica y Reconstructiva, División de Cirugía. Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Alina Ortega-Briones
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Hospital San José Quirónsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hinne A Rakhorst
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Jagdeep Nanchahal
- Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schade AT, Sibande W, Kumwenda M, Desmond N, Chokotho L, Karasouli E, Metcalfe A, Harrison WJ. "Don't rush into thinking of walking again": Patient views of treatment and disability following an open tibia fracture in Malawi. Wellcome Open Res 2022; 7:204. [PMID: 36110835 PMCID: PMC9453110 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18063.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Open tibia fractures are a common injury following road traffic accidents in Malawi and can lead to long term disability. Very little is known about patients' experiences of the healthcare system and the disability in low-income countries following this injury. The aim of the study was to explore patient experiences of treatment and disability following an open tibia fracture in Malawi. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with ten patients with open tibia fractures at a central hospital in Blantyre, Malawi. A mixed deductive-inductive thematic analysis was used to identify broad themes of treatment and disability. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Results: Patient characteristics included an average age of 39.1 years old (22-63) and 80% were male. Broad themes found were delays in receiving treatment, change in individuals' societal role and delayed recovery associated with pain and immobility. Conclusions: Open tibia fractures in Malawi have a devastating impact on patients and their families. Further studies are required to explore the reasons for the delays in open fracture emergency treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Thomas Schade
- Public Health, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi
- Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Wakumanya Sibande
- Public Health, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Moses Kumwenda
- Public Health, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicola Desmond
- Public Health, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Linda Chokotho
- Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Phelps EE, Tutton E, Costa ML, Achten J, Moscrop A, Perry DC. Protecting my injured child: a qualitative study of parents' experience of caring for a child with a displaced distal radius fracture. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:270. [PMID: 35549910 PMCID: PMC9097445 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03340-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Childhood fractures can have a significant impact on the daily lives of families affecting children’s normal activities and parent’s work. Wrist fractures are the most common childhood fracture. The more serious wrist fractures, that can look visibly bent, are often treated with surgery to realign the bones; but this may not be necessary as bent bones straighten in growing children. The children’s radius acute fracture fixation trial (CRAFFT) is a multicentre randomised trial of surgery versus a cast without surgery for displaced wrist fractures. Little is known about how families experience these wrist fractures and how they manage treatment uncertainty. This study aimed to understand families’ experience of this injury and what it is like to be asked to include their child in a clinical trial. Methods Nineteen families (13 mothers, 7 fathers, 2 children) from across the UK participated in telephone interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Our findings highlight parents’ desire to be a good parent through the overarching theme “protecting my injured child”. To protect their child after injury, parents endeavoured to make the right decisions about treatment and provide comfort to their child but they experienced ongoing worry about their child’s recovery. Our findings show that parents felt responsible for the decision about their child’s treatment and their child’s recovery. They also reveal the extent to which parents worried about the look of their child’s wrist and their need for reassurance that the wrist was healing. Conclusion Our findings show that protecting their child after injury can be challenging for parents who need support to make decisions about treatment and confidently facilitate their child’s recovery. They also highlight the importance of providing information about treatments, acknowledging parents’ concerns and their desire to do the right thing for their child, reassuring parents that their child’s wrist will heal and ensuring parents understand what to expect as their child recovers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E E Phelps
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - E Tutton
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - M L Costa
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Achten
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - A Moscrop
- Parent Representative, Liverpool, UK
| | - D C Perry
- Kadoorie, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Roodbeen RTJ, Lugtenberg M, Pöstges H, Lansink KWW, Theeuwes HP, de Jongh MAC, Joosen MCW. Experiences of recovery and posthospital care needs of working-age adults after physical trauma: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053330. [PMID: 35443944 PMCID: PMC9021804 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore experiences of recovery after physical trauma and identify long-term needs for posthospital care. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING A qualitative study was conducted consisting of seven online focus groups among working-age adults who sustained their injury between 9 months and 5 years ago. Trauma patients discharged from a level 1 trauma centre in the Netherlands were divided into three groups based on the type of their physical trauma (monotrauma, polytrauma and traumatic brain injury). Group interviews were transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS Despite differences in type and severity of their injuries, participants all struggled with the impact that trauma had on various aspects of their lives. They experienced recovery as an unpredictable and inconstant process aimed at resuming a meaningful life. Work was often perceived as an important part of recovery, though the value attributed to work could change over time. Participants struggled to bring the difficulties they encountered in their daily lives and at work to the attention of healthcare professionals (HCPs). While posthospital care needs varied between and across groups, all people stressed the need for flexible access to person-centred, multidisciplinary care and support after hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals that people with a broad variety of injury experience recovery as a process towards resuming a meaningful life and report the need to expand trauma care to include comprehensive support to live well long term. Person-centred care might be helpful to enable HCPs to take people's individual long-term needs and life situations into account. Furthermore, providing timely access to coordinated, multidisciplinary care after discharge is advocated. Integrated care models that span a network of multidisciplinary support around the person may help align existing services and may facilitate easy and timely access to the most suitable support for injured people and their loved ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruud T J Roodbeen
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
- Research Department, Breuer&Intraval Research and Consultancy, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Lugtenberg
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Heide Pöstges
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Koen W W Lansink
- Department Trauma Topcare, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Hilco P Theeuwes
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska A C de Jongh
- Department Trauma Topcare, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
- Brabant Trauma Registry, Network Emergency Care Brabant, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Margot C W Joosen
- Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Noord-Brabant, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Houwen T, de Munter L, Lansink KWW, de Jongh MAC. There are more things in physical function and pain: a systematic review on physical, mental and social health within the orthopedic fracture population using PROMIS. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:34. [PMID: 35384568 PMCID: PMC8986932 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00440-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) is more and more extensively being used in medical literature in patients with an orthopedic fracture. Yet, many articles studied heterogeneous groups with chronic orthopedic disorders in which fracture patients were included as well. At this moment, there is no systematic overview of the exact use of PROMIS measures in the orthopedic fracture population. Therefore this review aimed to provide an overview of the PROMIS health domains physical health, mental health and social health in patients suffering an orthopedic fracture.
Methods This systematic review was documented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled Trials, CINAHL and Google Scholar in December 2020 using a combination of MeSH terms and specific index terms related to orthopedic fractures and PROMIS questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were available full text articles that were describing the use of any PROMIS questionnaires in both the adult and pediatric extremity fracture population. Results We included 51 relevant articles of which most were observational studies (n = 47, 92.2%). A single fracture population was included in 47 studies of which 9 involved ankle fractures (9/51; 17.6%), followed by humeral fractures (8/51; 15.7%), tibia fractures (6/51; 11.8%) and radial -or ulnar fractures (5/51; 9.8%). PROMIS Physical Function (n = 32, 32/51 = 62.7%) and PROMIS Pain Interference (n = 21, 21/51 = 41.2%) were most frequently used questionnaires. PROMIS measures concerning social (n = 5/51 = 9.8%) and mental health (10/51 = 19.6%) were much less often used as outcome measures in the fracture population. A gradually increasing use of PROMIS questionnaires in the orthopedic fracture population was seen since 2017. Conclusion Many different PROMIS measures on multiple domains are available and used in previous articles with orthopedic fracture patients. With physical function and pain interference as most popular PROMIS measures, it is important to emphasize that other health-domains such as mental and social health can also be essential to fracture patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00440-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thymen Houwen
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands. .,Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Leonie de Munter
- Department of Traumatology, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Koen W W Lansink
- Department of Surgery, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Mariska A C de Jongh
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nightingale J, Shu'an KL, Scammell BE, Leighton P, Ollivere BJ. What Is Important to Patients Who Are Recovering From an Open Tibial Fracture? A Qualitative Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:263-272. [PMID: 34779791 PMCID: PMC8747585 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open tibial fracture research has traditionally focused on surgical techniques; however, despite technological advances, outcomes from these injuries remain poor, with patients facing a sustained reduced quality of life. Research has rarely asked patients what is important to them after an open tibial fracture, and this question could potentially offer great insight into how to support patients. A qualitative study may assist in our understanding of this subject. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We asked: (1) What common themes did patients who have experienced open tibial fractures share? (2) What stresses and coping strategies did those patients articulate? (3) What sources for acquiring coping strategies did patients say they benefited from? METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who had sustained an open tibial fracture between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2019. All participants were recruited from a Level 1 trauma center in England, and 26 participants were included. The mean age was 44 ± 17 years, and 77% (20 of 26) were men. The patients' injuries ranged in severity, and they had a range of treatments and complications. Transcripts were analyzed using framework analysis, with codes subsequently organized into themes and subthemes. RESULTS Four themes were identified, which included recouping physical mobility, values around treatment, fears about poor recovery, and coping strategies to reduce psychological burden. Coping strategies were important in mitigating the psychological burden of injury. Task-focused coping strategies were preferred by patients and perceived as taking a proactive approach to recovery. Healthcare practitioners, and others with lived experience were able to educate patients on coping, but such resources were scant and therefore probably less accessible to those with the greatest need. CONCLUSION Most individuals fail to return to previous activities, and it is unlikely that improvements in surgical techniques will make major improvements in patient outcomes in the near future. Investment in psychosocial support could potentially improve patient experience and outcomes. Digital information platforms and group rehabilitation clinics were identified as potential avenues for development that could offer individuals better psychosocial support with minimal additional burden for surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Nightingale
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kyle Lin Shu'an
- Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Brigitte E. Scammell
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- Population and Lifespan Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ben J. Ollivere
- Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bretherton CP, Claireaux HA, Gower J, Martin S, Thornhill A, Johnson L, Silvester L, Kearney RS, Baxter M, Dixon P, Giblin V, Griffin XL, Eardley W. Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e057198. [PMID: 34848529 PMCID: PMC8634374 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine research priorities for the management of complex fractures, which represent the shared priorities of patients, their families, carers and healthcare professionals. DESIGN/SETTING A national (UK) research priority setting partnership. PARTICIPANTS People who have experienced a complex fracture, their carers and relatives, and relevant healthcare professionals and clinical academics involved in treating patients with complex fractures. The scope includes open fractures, fractures to joints broken into multiple pieces, multiple concomitant fractures and fractures involving the pelvis and acetabulum. METHODS A multiphase priority setting exercise was conducted in partnership with the James Lind Alliance over 21 months (October 2019 to June 2021). A national survey asked respondents to submit their research uncertainties which were then combined into several indicative questions. The existing evidence was searched to ensure that the questions had not already been sufficiently answered. A second national survey asked respondents to prioritise the research questions. A final shortlist of 18 questions was taken to a stakeholder workshop, where a consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities. RESULTS A total of 532 uncertainties, submitted by 158 respondents (including 33 patients/carers) were received during the initial survey. These were refined into 58 unique indicative questions, of which all 58 were judged to be true uncertainties after review of the existing evidence. 136 people (including 56 patients/carers) responded to the interim prioritisation survey and 18 questions were taken to a final consensus workshop between patients, carers and healthcare professionals. At the final workshop, a consensus was reached for the ranking of the top 10 questions. CONCLUSIONS The top 10 research priorities for complex fracture include questions regarding rehabilitation, complications, psychological support and return to life-roles. These shared priorities will now be used to guide funders and teams wishing to research complex fractures over the coming decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henry A Claireaux
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Lucy Silvester
- Physiotherapy, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Mark Baxter
- Orthogeriatrics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Dixon
- Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Victoria Giblin
- Plastic Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - William Eardley
- Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pearson NA, Tutton E, Joeris A, Gwilym S, Grant R, Keene DJ, Haywood KL. Co-producing a multi-stakeholder Core Outcome Set for distal Tibia and Ankle fractures (COSTA): a study protocol. Trials 2021; 22:443. [PMID: 34247628 PMCID: PMC8273034 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05415-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ankle fracture is a common injury with a strong evidence base focused on effectiveness of treatments. However, there are no reporting guidelines on distal tibia and ankle fractures. This has led to heterogeneity in outcome reporting and consequently, restricted the contribution of evidence syntheses. Over the past decade, core outcome sets have been developed to address this issue and are available for several common fractures, including those of the hip, distal radius, and open tibial fractures. This protocol describes the process to co-produce-with patient partners and other key stakeholders-a multi-stakeholder derived Core Outcome Set for distal Tibia and Ankle fractures (COSTA). The scope of COSTA will be for clinical trials. METHODS The study will have five-stages which will include the following: (i) systematic reviews of existing qualitative studies and outcome reporting in randomised controlled trial studies to inform a developing list of potential outcome domains; (ii) qualitative interviews (including secondary data) and focus groups with patients and healthcare professionals to explore the impact of ankle fracture and the outcomes that really matter; (iii) generation of meaningful outcome statements with the study team, international advisory group and patient partners; (iv) a multi-round, international e-Delphi study to achieve consensus on the core domain set; and (v) an evidence-based consensus on a core measurement set will be achieved through a structured group consensus meeting, recommending best assessment approaches for each of the domains in the core domain set. DISCUSSION Development of COSTA will provide internationally endorsed outcome assessment guidance for clinical trials for distal tibia and ankle fractures. This will enhance comparative reviews of interventions, potentially reducing reporting bias and research waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan A. Pearson
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Trauma and Major Trauma Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Stephen Gwilym
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Grant
- National Institute for Health Research, Applied Research Collaboration, Coventry, UK
- Warwick Medical School, User Teaching and Research Action Partnership, Coventry, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal sciences, Fragility Fracture Network, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J. Keene
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Kadoorie Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kirstie L. Haywood
- Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leggett H, Scantlebury A, Byrne A, Harden M, Hewitt C, O'Carroll G, Sharma H, McDaid C. Exploring what is important to patients with regards to quality of life after experiencing a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:158. [PMID: 34059081 PMCID: PMC8166062 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01795-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to understand the impact of lower limb reconstruction surgery on patients' quality of life (QOL). Existing measures have not been developed to specifically capture patient experiences amongst adults with lower limb conditions that require reconstruction surgery. This review aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence to identify what is important to patients requiring, undergoing, or following reconstructive surgery for lower limb conditions. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and Cinahl were searched from inception until November 2020. Studies were included if they employed qualitative research methods, involved patients requiring, undergoing or following lower limb reconstruction and explored patients' experiences of care, treatment, recovery and QOL. Mixed methods studies that did not separately report qualitative findings, mixed population studies that were not separately reported and studies in languages other than English were excluded. Included studies were analysed using thematic synthesis. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative studies checklist was used to undertake quality assessment. RESULTS Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The thematic synthesis identified two overarching themes: (1) areas of living key to QOL for lower limb reconstruction patients and (2) moving towards a new normal. The way in which lower limb reconstruction affects an individual's QOL and their recovery is complex and is influenced by a range of inter-related factors, which will affect patients to varying degrees depending on their individual circumstances. We identified these factors as: pain, daily functioning and lifestyle, identity, income, emotional wellbeing, support, the ability to adapt and adjust and the ability to move forwards. CONCLUSIONS The way patients' QOL is affected after a lower limb reconstruction is complex, may change over time and is strongly linked to their recovery. These findings will aid us in developing a conceptual framework which identifies the outcomes important to patients and those that should be included in a PROM. Further research is then required to establish whether the range of factors we identified are captured by existing PROMs. Depending on the outcome of this work, a new PROM for patients following lower limb reconstruction may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Leggett
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - A Scantlebury
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - A Byrne
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - M Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - C Hewitt
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - G O'Carroll
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - H Sharma
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals, Hull, HU3 2JZ, UK
| | - C McDaid
- York Trials Unit, The University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Keene DJ, Knight R, Bruce J, Dutton SJ, Tutton E, Achten J, Costa ML. Chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics after surgery for major trauma to the lower limb: prevalence, predictors, and association with pain severity, disability, and quality of life in the UK WHiST trial. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:1047-1054. [PMID: 33902306 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b.bjj-2020-2204.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To identify the prevalence of neuropathic pain after lower limb fracture surgery, assess associations with pain severity, quality of life and disability, and determine baseline predictors of chronic neuropathic pain at three and at six months post-injury. METHODS Secondary analysis of a UK multicentre randomized controlled trial (Wound Healing in Surgery for Trauma; WHiST) dataset including adults aged 16 years or over following surgery for lower limb major trauma. The trial recruited 1,547 participants from 24 trauma centres. Neuropathic pain was measured at three and six months using the Doleur Neuropathique Questionnaire (DN4); 701 participants provided a DN4 score at three months and 781 at six months. Overall, 933 participants provided DN4 for at least one time point. Physical disability (Disability Rating Index (DRI) 0 to 100) and health-related quality-of-life (EuroQol five-dimension five-level; EQ-5D-5L) were measured. Candidate predictors of neuropathic pain included sex, age, BMI, injury mechanism, concurrent injury, diabetes, smoking, alcohol, analgaesia use pre-injury, index surgery location, fixation type, Injury Severity Score, open injury, and wound care. RESULTS The median age of the participants was 51 years (interquartile range 35 to 64). At three and six months post-injury respectively, 32% (222/702) and 30% (234/787) had neuropathic pain, 56% (396/702) and 53% (413/787) had chronic pain without neuropathic characteristics, and the remainder were pain-free. Pain severity was higher among those with neuropathic pain. Linear regression analyses found that those with neuropathic pain at six months post-injury had more physical disability (DRI adjusted mean difference 11.49 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.84 to 15.14; p < 0.001) and poorer quality of life (EQ-5D utility -0.15 (95% CI -0.19 to -0.11); p < 0.001) compared to those without neuropathic characteristics. Logistic regression identified that prognostic factors of younger age, current smoker, below knee fracture, concurrent injuries, and regular analgaesia pre-injury were associated with higher odds of post-injury neuropathic pain. CONCLUSION Pain with neuropathic characteristics is common after lower limb fracture surgery and persists to six months post-injury. Persistent neuropathic pain is associated with substantially poorer recovery. Further attention to identify neuropathic pain post-lower limb injury, predicting patients at risk, and targeting interventions, is indicated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1047-1054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Keene
- Kadoorie Research Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Knight
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie Bruce
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Susan J Dutton
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Tutton
- Kadoorie Research Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Juul Achten
- Kadoorie Research Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Matthew L Costa
- Kadoorie Research Centre, Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Middlebrook N, Heneghan NR, Falla D, Silvester L, Rushton AB, Soundy AA. Successful recovery following musculoskeletal trauma: protocol for a qualitative study of patients' and physiotherapists' perceptions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:163. [PMID: 33568110 PMCID: PMC7874566 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04035-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Annually in the UK, 40,000–90,000 people are involved in a traumatic incident. Severity of injury and how well people recover from their injuries varies, with physiotherapy playing a key role in the rehabilitation process. Recovery is evaluated using multiple outcome measures for perceived levels of pain severity and quality of life. It is unclear however, what constitutes a successful recovery from injury throughout the course of recovery from the patient perspective, and whether this aligns with physiotherapists’ perspectives. Methods A qualitative study using two approaches: Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis following the Kreuger framework for focus groups. A purposive sample of 20 patients who have experienced musculoskeletal trauma within the past 4 weeks and 12 physiotherapists who manage this patient population will be recruited from a single trauma centre in the UK. Semi-structured interviews with patients at 4 weeks, 6 and 12 months following injury, and 2 focus groups with physiotherapists will be undertaken at one time point. Views and perceptions on the definition of recovery and what constitutes a successful recovery will be explored using both methods, with a focus on the lived experience and patient journey following musculoskeletal trauma, and how this changes through the process of recovery. Data from both the semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be analysed separately and then integrated and synthesised into key themes ensuring similarities and differences are identified. Strategies to ensure trustworthiness e.g., reflexivity will be employed. Discussion Recovery following musculoskeletal trauma is complex and understanding of the concept of successful recovery and how this changes over time following an injury is largely unknown. It is imperative to understand the patient perspective and whether these perceptions align with current views of physiotherapists. A greater understanding of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma has potential to change clinical care, optimise patient centred care and improve efficiency and clinical decision making during rehabilitation. This in turn can contribute to improved clinical effectiveness, patient outcome and patient satisfaction with potential service and economic cost savings. This study has ethical approval (IRAS 287781/REC 20/PR/0712). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04035-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Middlebrook
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | - N R Heneghan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - D Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - L Silvester
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, University Hospital, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - A B Rushton
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Western University, School of Physical Therapy, London, Ontario, N6G 1H1, Canada
| | - A A Soundy
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Leggett H, Scantlebury A, Sharma H, Hewitt C, Harden M, McDaid C. Quality of life following a lower limb reconstructive procedure: a protocol for the development of a conceptual framework. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040378. [PMID: 33303449 PMCID: PMC7733194 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lower limb conditions requiring reconstructive surgery can be either congenital or acquired from trauma, infection or other medical conditions. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used by healthcare professionals to assess the impact of a patient's condition (and treatment) on quality of life. However, we are not aware of any measures developed specifically for people requiring lower limb reconstructive surgery. Consequently, it is not clear the extent to which current PROMs accurately and specifically measure the outcomes that are important to these patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The 'PROLLIT' (Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Lower Limb Reconstruction) involves three phases: to explore what is important to patients with regard to quality of life (phase 1), ascertain whether current measures adequately capture these experiences (phase 2) and if not begin, the development of a new PROM (phase 3). The population of interest is people requiring, undergoing or after undergoing reconstructive surgery for a lower limb condition. In this paper, we describe phase 1, which aims to develop a conceptual framework to identify and map what is important to this group with regard to social interactions, employment, perceived health and quality of life after condition onset/injury and throughout recovery. The conceptual framework will be developed through three steps: (step A) a qualitative evidence synthesis, (step B) a qualitative study with patients and staff to explore patient's views and experiences of lower limb reconstructive surgery and (step C) a round table discussion with key stakeholders where findings from step A and step B will be brought together and used to finalise the conceptual framework. ETHICS CONSIDERATION AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been granted for the qualitative data collection (step B) from South Central Berkshire Research Ethics committee (REF:20/SC/0114). Findings from steps A and B will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication in academic journals, and presented at academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019139587. ISRCTN REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN75201623.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hemant Sharma
- Trauma and Orthopedics, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| | | | - Melissa Harden
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD), University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
AIMS To describe a new objective classification for open fractures of the lower limb and to correlate the classification with patient-centred outcomes. METHODS The proposed classification was investigated within a cohort of adults with open fractures of the lower limb who were recruited as part of two large clinical trials within the UK Major Trauma Network. The classification was correlated with patient-reported Disability Rating Index (DRI) and EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) health-related quality of life in the year after injury, and with deep infection at 30 days, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of a deep surgical site infection. RESULTS A total of 748 participants were included in the analysis. Of these, 288 (38.5%) had a simple open fracture and 460 (61.5%) had a complex fracture as defined by the new classification system. At 12 months, the mean DRI in the simple fracture group was 32.5 (SD 26.8) versus 43.9 (SD 26.1) in the complex fracture group (odds ratio (OR) 8.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.69 to 12.69). At 12 months the mean health-related quality of life (EQ-5D utility) in the simple fracture group was 0.59 (SD 0.29) versus 0.56 (SD 0.32) in the complex fracture group (OR -0.03; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.02). The differences in the rate of deep infection at 30 days was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The Orthopaedic Trauma Society open fracture classification is based upon objective descriptors of the injury and correlates with patient-centred outcomes in a large cohort of open fractures of the lower limb. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1469-1474.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex J Trompeter
- Orthopaedic Trauma/Limb Reconstruction Unit, St George's University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ruth Knight
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick Parsons
- Statistics and Epidemiology Department, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Matthew L Costa
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Trompeter A, Knight R, Parsons N, Costa M. Infographic: The Orthopaedic Trauma Society classification of open fractures. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:1467-1468. [PMID: 33135441 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b11.bjj-2020-1998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Trompeter
- Orthopaedic Trauma/Limb Reconstruction Unit, Orthopaedic Trauma/Limb Reconstruction Unit, St George's University Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Knight
- Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Parsons
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Matt Costa
- Oxford Trauma and Emergency Care, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chen YS, Cai YX, Kang XR, Zhou ZH, Qi X, Ying CT, Zhang YP, Tao J. Predicting the risk of sarcopenia in elderly patients with patellar fracture: development and assessment of a new predictive nomogram. PeerJ 2020; 8:e8793. [PMID: 32328345 PMCID: PMC7166043 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop a risk prediction model for postoperative sarcopenia in elderly patients with patellar fractures in China. Patients and methods We conducted a community survey of patients aged ≥55 years who underwent surgery for patellar fractures between January 2013 and October 2018, through telephone interviews, community visits, and outpatient follow-up. We established a predictive model for assessing the risk of sarcopenia after patellar fractures. We developed the prediction model by combining multivariate logistic regression analysis with the least absolute shrinkage model and selection operator regression (lasso analysis) as well as the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm. The predictive quality and clinical utility of the predictive model were determined using C-index, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. We also conducted internal sampling methods for qualitative assessment. Result We recruited 137 participants (53 male; mean age, 65.7 years). Various risk factors were assessed, and low body mass index and advanced age were identified as the most important risk factor (P < 0.05). The prediction rate of the model was good (C-index: 0.88; 95% CI [0.80552–0.95448]), with a satisfactory correction effect. The C index is 0.97 in the validation queue and 0.894 in the entire cohort. Decision curve analysis suggested good clinical practicability. Conclusion Our prediction model shows promise as a cost-effective tool for predicting the risk of postoperative sarcopenia in elderly patients based on the following: advanced age, low body mass index, diabetes, less outdoor exercise, no postoperative rehabilitation, different surgical methods, diabetes, open fracture, and removal of internal fixation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Sheng Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan-Xian Cai
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue-Ran Kang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Zi-Hui Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin Qi
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chen-Ting Ying
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun-Peng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Tao
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
|