Maximising comfort: how do patients describe the care that matters? A two-stage qualitative descriptive study to develop a quality improvement framework for comfort-related care in inpatient settings

Veteran patient perceptions of a universal gloving intervention for health care-associated infection prevention: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Universal gloving by health care workers (HCW) for all patient care activities (beyond isolation and standard precautions) has been proposed to reduce health care-associated infection transmission, but patient perceptions of this approach are unclear. We interviewed patients who experienced a universal gloving intervention by HCW within Veterans Affairs inpatient acute care units to understand their perceptions of universal gloving.

METHODS

We conducted interviews with 15 patients across 5 Veterans Affairs hospitals. We used a rapid qualitative inquiry approach to analyze interview transcripts and identified patient perceptions of universal gloving regarding patient knowledge, patient experience, and HCW practice.

RESULTS

Patients were highly supportive of HCW use of universal gloving, noting potential benefits for infection prevention, patient and HCW safety, and patient feelings of well-being and care. Patients also communicated support of universal gloving in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

DISCUSSION

Universal gloving by HCW may support patients' feelings of safe and positive health care delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' positive perception of gloving may facilitate universal gloving as an infection prevention and control strategy.

Effectiveness of smartphone-based virtual reality relaxation (SVR) for enhancing comfort in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Comfort, anxiety, and pain significantly impact the quality of life and treatment adherence in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Virtual reality (VR) technology offers a novel non-pharmacological intervention to address these primary concerns. While vital signs provide objective physiological data, they are considered secondary outcomes that may reflect changes in patients' subjective experiences.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of smartphone-based virtual reality relaxation (SVR) interventions on improving comfort and reducing anxiety and pain (primary outcomes) in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Additionally, it assesses the impact on blood pressure and pulse rate (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

This prospective, two-arm, randomized controlled trial involved 99 cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy who were randomized into the SVR group (n = 50) and control group (n = 49) from March to May 2023. The SVR group received a 10-min immersive VR experience featuring 360-degree natural scenery videos with relaxing sounds, while participants in the control group received standard care and guided imagery leaflets. The primary outcomes-comfort, anxiety, and pain-were evaluated at various time points: comfort was assessed at baseline and post-chemotherapy, while anxiety and pain were assessed at four stages (pre-chemotherapy, pre-VR, immediate post-intervention, and post-chemotherapy). Secondary outcomes included vital signs (blood pressure and pulse rate), which were assessed at the same four stages. Cybersickness symptoms were examined post-chemotherapy. Data analysis involved independent t tests, linear regression, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).

RESULTS

Among 99 randomized patients, the SVR group reported significantly higher comfort levels (p = 0.01; Cohen's d = 0.4), reduced anxiety (p = 0.01; Cohen's d = 0.50), and pain (p = 0.015; Cohen's d = 0.35) compared to the control group. No significant differences were found in heart rate (p = 0.92), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.36), or diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.95). The majority of participants (66-96%) in the SVR group did not report cybersickness symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

SVR shows promise as an intervention for improving comfort and reducing anxiety and pain in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Healthcare providers at chemotherapy centers should consider incorporating VR devices and curated content into patient care routines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05756465, registered on January 22, 2023.

Managing Postembolization Syndrome Through a Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support System: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Although transarterial chemoembolization has improved as an interventional method for hepatocellular carcinoma, subsequent postembolization syndrome is a threat to the patients' quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system in postembolization syndrome management across nurses and patient outcomes. This study is a randomized controlled trial. We included 40 RNs and 51 hospitalized patients in the study. For nurses in the experimental group, a clinical decision support system and a handbook were provided for 6 weeks, and for nurses in the control group, only a handbook was provided. Notably, the experimental group exhibited statistically significant improvements in patient-centered caring attitude, pain management barrier identification, and comfort care competence after clinical decision support system implementation. Moreover, patients' symptom interference during the experimental period significantly decreased compared with before the intervention. This study offers insights into the potential of clinical decision support system in refining nursing practices and nurturing patient well-being, presenting prospects for advancing patient-centered care and nursing competence. The clinical decision support system contents, encompassing postembolization syndrome risk prediction and care recommendations, should underscore its role in fostering a patient-centered care attitude and bolster nurses' comfort care competence.

Application of Kolcaba's Comfort Theory in healthcare promoting adults' comfort: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Comfort is a primary goal of healthcare. Theory-informed interventions and measurement are essential for comfort enhancement.

OBJECTIVES

To categorise and synthesise the international literature on the application of Kolcaba's Comfort Theory in research and practice aiming to promote adults' comfort.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Papers reporting the application of Kolcaba's Comfort Theory on adult participants published in English and Chinese.

SOURCES OF EVIDENCE

MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycInfo, Embase, AMED, Web of Science, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, JBI EBP Database, CNKI, Wan Fang; grey literature of Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar and The Comfort Line were searched from January 1991 to January 2024.

CHART METHODS

Following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist, two reviewers selected papers and extracted data independently using a standardised chart embedded in NVivo software. A thematic synthesis and a descriptive analysis were provided.

RESULTS

The review included 359 papers. Approximately two-thirds (n=216, 60.2%) had been published since 2017. The majority of papers (n=316, 88.0%) originated from China, the USA, Turkey, Brazil and Portugal. The use of Kolcaba's Comfort Theory was dominated in a range of hospital settings (n=263) and with participants suffering neoplasms (n=55). Seven categories of theory application were identified: (I) interventions underpinned by Comfort Theory as the theoretical framework, (II) interventions evaluated by instruments derived from Comfort Theory, (III) descriptive or observational studies of services or practices underpinned by Comfort Theory, (IV) surveys using questionnaires derived from Comfort Theory, (V) questionnaires development or adaption based on Comfort Theory, (VI) qualitative studies interpreted by Comfort Theory and (VII) literature reviews and discussion about Comfort Theory use. The most commonly evaluated interventions included music therapy (n=31), position intervention (n=20) and massage (n=19), and the most commonly used questionnaire was General Comfort Questionnaire (n=109).

CONCLUSIONS

Kolcaba's Comfort Theory has been largely used in interventions and assessments across a wide range of contexts, providing a set of options for practitioners. However, quantifying evidence is needed through further systematic reviews, and continuous development of Comfort Theory is warranted based on the categorisation by this review.

Critically ill patients' experiences of discomfort and comfort in the intensive care unit: A qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND

The physiological state of critically ill patients is severely impaired by illness or trauma and is uncomfortable. Such experiences cause long-term anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand discomfort and comfort based on the experiences of critically ill adult patients in the intensive care unit and to explore ways to improve their comfort.

METHODS

This qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 15 critically ill patients (age range: 46-81 years; six females) in the intensive care unit using semistructured interviews and participant observation. The data collected were analysed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Data were collected from the intensive care unit and general ward of a university hospital in Japan.

FINDINGS

Six themes related to discomfort and comfort were identified. The three themes related to discomfort were "overlapping uncertainties", "being unable to control physical discomfort", and "having to endure psychologically and situationally". The three themes related to comfort were "feeling connected brings calm", "routine care relieves pain and thirst", and "ease when one can decide for oneself". Participants' discomfort involved physical and psychological factors and was related to treatments, procedures, care, and the environment. Moreover, more than half of the patients endured unmet needs. Comfort was brought about by providing routine care for physical discomforts that critically ill patients often experience, feeling alive and connected to others and encouraging independence.

CONCLUSION

Recognising the potential for physical and psychological discomfort, as well as communication and other difficulties, in critically ill patients is crucial. Patients may also experience discomfort when healthcare providers take the lead, which underscores the importance of involving patients in their care. By showing respect for patients' intentions and involving them in decision-making, healthcare providers can improve patient comfort and promote a more collaborative approach to care.

Tools used to assess comfort among patients undergoing high flow nasal cannula: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The aims were twofold: (a) to map tools documented in the literature to evaluate comfort among patients undergoing high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment; and (b) to assess if the retrieved tools have been validated for this purpose.

METHODS

A scoping review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). In July 2023, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were consulted. Studies assessing comfort in adult, paediatric, and neonatal patients undergoing HFNC were included.

RESULTS

Seventy-four articles were included, among which nine (12.2 %) investigated comfort as the primary aim. Twenty-five different tools were found, classifiable into 14 types, mostly unidimensional and originating from those measuring pain. The most widely used was the Visual Analogic Scale (n = 27, 35.6 %) followed by the Numerical Rating Scale (n = 11, 14.5 %) and less defined generic tools (n = 10, 13.2 %) with different metrics (e.g. 0-5, 0-10, 0-100). Only the General Comfort Questionnaire and the Comfort Scale were specifically validated for the assessment of comfort among adults and children, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although the comfort of patients undergoing HFNC is widely investigated in the literature, there is a scarcity of tools specifically validated in this field. Those used have been validated mainly to assess pain, suggesting the need to inform patients to prevent confusion while measuring comfort during HFNC and to develop more research in the field.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Comfort assessment is an important aspect of nursing care. Given the lack of validation studies in the field, efforts in research are recommended.

Assessing Barriers to Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

The incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has greatly increased. Previously dominated by infectious diseases, LMICs are the new epicentre of CVDs. CVD is a common problem amongst the population in the African continent; however, many countries in LMICs lack the resources to stem the rise of CVDs. A systematic review was conducted between March and July 2023 to assess barriers to the primary prevention of CVDs in studies conducted in LMICs. Online databases, such as Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE, were consulted. Keywords included primary prevention, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, weight loss, and physical fitness, all of which focused on LMICs. To enrich the literature review, efforts were made to check other listed references and more papers were retrieved. The inclusion criteria were countries in LMICs, CVD, full-text, and peer-reviewed journals. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included. Exclusion criteria included high-income countries, secondary prevention, and research unrelated to CVDs, such as barriers in oncology or mental health. A total of 1089 papers were retrieved from the search engines. After applying the exclusion criteria for LMICs, only 186 papers were retained. A further search for quality, relevance, and duplicity reduced the qualifying number to 50 papers. Further efforts to retrieve the data and examine the quality of the studies resulted in 18 final selected studies. Three categories emerged based on the type of barriers: physician barriers, patient barriers, and health system barriers. Evidently, in several LMICs, guidelines for CVD prevention were lacking, and too much emphasis was placed on secondary prevention at the expense of primary prevention, a lack of human resources, and inadequate infrastructure. Overworked healthcare providers were unable to allocate adequate time to the patients. There was no shared decision-making process. Patient barriers included lack of motivation, no symptoms, low level of education, no insurance, long physical distances to the facilities, and inadequate medication or stock out. Some of the major barriers included closing and opening hours, poor operating space, inadequate funding from the government or donors, and lack of electronic medical services. There are many barriers to accessing primary prevention services for CVDs. These barriers can be divided into patient, physician, or health system barriers. More research needs to be conducted in LMICs to address the increasing risk factors for CVDs. Greater investment is required by national governments to provide more resources. Task shifting and shared decision-making are some of the quick wins.

Enhancing General Surgery Clerkships: The Application and Value of Standardized Patient-Based Situational Simulation Teaching

OBJECTIVE

We explored the value of a standardized patient-based situational simulation teaching method in general surgery internships.

METHODS

A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with clinical medicine undergraduates from the 2020 cohort of our university as subjects. These students were randomly divided into a traditional teaching (TT) group and a combined teaching (CT) group based on their internship schedules. The TT group followed the conventional teaching model, while the CT group engaged in the standardized patient-based situational simulation teaching method. The study compared differences in pre-internship theoretical scores, post-internship theoretical scores, medical record writing quality, and student satisfaction between the two groups.

RESULTS

The CT group (n=108) significantly outperformed the TT group (n=104) in post-internship theoretical scores and medical record writing quality (all P<0.05) and showed marked improvement in stimulating students' interest in learning (P=0.015), enhancing clinical diagnostic and treatment abilities (P<0.001), improving doctor‒patient communication skills (P<0.001), strengthening medical mission sense (P<0.001), reinforcing physicians' sense of responsibility (P<0.001), and facilitating the application of learned knowledge (P<0.001). These differences were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The standardized patient-based situational simulation teaching method (CT) in general surgery internships has been highly recognized by students and can enhance their clinical competency, offering considerable value for broader.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Methods for Pain Reduction During Injection Procedures in the Frontalis Muscle

BACKGROUND

Forehead aesthetic injections are a well-known source of discomfort, and many analgesic non-invasive techniques have been proposed to ameliorate pain. However, no study has compared all these techniques for aesthetic purposes. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical cream anesthesia, vibratory stimulus, cryotherapy, pressure, and even no intervention, on pain during and immediately after injection, when considering aesthetic injections in the forehead.

METHODS

Seventy patients were selected and had their foreheads divided into 5 parts, which received four different analgesic techniques, and one control zone was added. A numeric rating scale was used to assess pain, two direct questions were asked to evaluate patients' preference and discomfort with the techniques, and the adverse events were quantified. The injections were performed in the same sequence, with three minutes of rest between them and in a single session. Comparisons among analgesic methods for pain relief were performed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), considering a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found among the analgesic methods, and between the methods and the control zone, both during and immediately after the injections (p > 0.05). The preferred method for pain relief was the use of topical anesthetic cream (47%), while the most uncomfortable technique was manual distraction (pressure) (36%). Only one patient reported an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

No analgesic method to diminish pain was superior to the others or was better than no method. Nevertheless, the topical anesthetic cream was the preferred technique, causing less discomfort.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

What are the triggers for palliative care referral in burn intensive care units? Results from a qualitative study based on healthcare professionals' views, clinical experiences and practices

BACKGROUND

Burns are a global public health problem, accounting for around 300,000 deaths annually. Burns have significant consequences for patients, families, healthcare teams and systems. Evidence suggests that the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units improves patients' comfort, decision-making processes and family care. Research is needed on how to optimise palliative care referrals.

AIM

To identify triggers for palliative care referral in critically burned patients based on professionals' views, experiences and practices.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

All five Burn Intensive Care Units reference centres across Portugal were invited; three participated. Inclusion criteria: Professionals with experience/working in these settings. A total of 15 professionals (12 nurses and 3 physicians) participated. Reflexive thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Three main triggers for palliative care referral were identified: (i) Burn severity and extension, (ii) Co-morbidities and (iii) Multiorgan failure. Other triggers were also generated: (i) Rehabilitative palliative care related to patients' suffering and changes in body image, (ii) Family suffering and/or dysfunctional and complex family processes, (iii) Long stay in the burn intensive care unit and (iv) Uncontrolled pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies triggers for palliative care in burn intensive care units based on professionals' views, clinical experiences and practices. The systematisation and use of triggers could help streamline referral pathways and strengthen the integration of palliative care in burn intensive care units. Research is needed on the use of these triggers in clinical practice to enhance decision-making processes, early and high-quality integrated palliative care and proportionate patient and family centred care.

Associations Between Patient Comfort with a Primary Care Provider and Three Measures of Behavioral Health Services Utilization

BACKGROUND

Behavioral health services (BHS) can help improve and treat mental and emotional health problems. Yet, attitudinal and/or structural barriers often prevent individuals from accessing and benefiting from these services. Positive provider-patient interactions in healthcare, encompassing patient comfort with a primary care provider (PCP), which is often enhanced by shared decision-making, may mitigate the stigma associated with seeing a mental health professional; this may improve BHS utilization among patients who need these services. However, few studies have examined how patient comfort with a PCP, often through shared decision-making, may influence patients' BHS utilization in the real world. This study sought to address this gap in practice.

METHOD

Multivariable regression analyses, using weighted data from an internet panel survey of Los Angeles County adults (n = 749), were carried out to examine the associations between patient comfort with a PCP and three measures of BHS utilization. Subsequent analyses were conducted to explore the extent to which shared decision-making moderated these associations.

RESULTS

Participants who reported an intermediate or high comfort level with a provider had higher odds of reporting that they were likely to see (aOR = 2.10 and 3.84, respectively) and get advice (aOR = 2.75 and 4.76, respectively) from a mental health professional compared to participants who reported a low comfort level. Although shared decision-making influenced participants' likelihood of seeing and getting advice from a mental health professional, it was not a statistically significant moderator in these associations.

CONCLUSION

Building stronger relationships with patients may improve BHS utilization, a provider practice that is likely underutilized.

'I wasn't made to feel like a nut case after all': A qualitative story completion study exploring healthcare recipient and carer perceptions of good professional caregiving relationships

BACKGROUND

Professional caregiving relationships are central to quality healthcare but are not always developed to a consistently high standard in clinical practice. Existing literature on what constitutes high-quality relationships and how they should be developed is plagued by dyadic conceptualisations; discipline, context and condition-specific research; and the absence of healthcare recipient and informal carer voices. This study aimed to address these issues by exploring how healthcare recipients and carers conceptualise good professional caregiving relationships regardless of discipline, care setting and clinical condition.

DESIGN

A qualitative story completion approach was used. Participants completed a story in response to a hypothetical stem that described a healthcare recipient (and, in some instances, carer) developing a good relationship with a new healthcare provider. Stories were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 35 healthcare recipients and 37 carers (n = 72 total).

RESULTS

Participants' stories were shaped by an overarching discourse that seeking help from new providers can elicit a range of unwanted emotions for both recipients and carers (e.g., anxiety, fear, dread). These unwanted emotions were experienced in relation to recipients' presenting health problems as well as their anticipated interactions with providers. Specifically, recipient and carer characters were fearful that providers would dismiss their concerns and judge them for deciding to seek help. Good relationships were seen to develop when healthcare providers worked to relieve or minimise these unwanted emotions, ensuring healthcare recipients and carers felt comfortable and at ease with the provider and the encounter. Participants positioned healthcare providers as primarily responsible for relieving recipients' and carers' unwanted emotions, which was achieved via four approaches: (1) easing into the encounter, (2) demonstrating interest in and understanding of recipients' presenting problems, (3) validating recipients' presenting problems and (4) enabling and respecting recipient choice. Participants' stories also routinely oriented to temporality, positioning relationships within recipients' and carers' wider care networks and biographical and temporal contexts.

CONCLUSION

The findings expand our understanding of professional caregiving relationships beyond dyadic, static conceptualisations. Specifically, the findings suggest that high-quality relationships might be achieved via a set of core healthcare provider behaviours that can be employed across disciplinary, context and condition-specific boundaries. In turn, this provides a basis to support interprofessional education and multidisciplinary healthcare delivery, enabling different healthcare disciplines, specialties, and teams to work from the same understanding of what is required to develop high-quality relationships.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The findings are based on stories from 72 healthcare recipient and carer participants, providing rich insight into their conceptualisations of high-quality professional caregiving relationships.

Patient and staff perceptions of short procedural sedation with propofol for joint and fracture reductions in the Emergency Department: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Emergency Department (ED) propofol sedation is widely used to facilitate reduction of fractures and dislocations, but little is known about patient and staff perceptions of the practice. Better understanding of these aspects may improve patient care.

METHODS

A qualitative exploratory study involving semi-structured patient interviews and ED healthcare professional focus groups. Interviews with adult patients (≥16 years) >1 hour after their sedation episode were audio-recorded, anonymised and transcribed verbatim to an electronic database. Thematic analysis using a general inductive method led to development of codes and themes. ED focus groups recordings were similarly transcribed and triangulated to patient interview outcomes.

RESULTS

Data saturation was reached after 16 patient interviews. Emergent central themes from a patient perspective were: 'fear of the unknown' and 'expressed relief that the procedure was comfortable.' Key themes included 'trust in the clinical team,' 'efficacy of pain management prior to sedation' and 'quality of the information delivered to patients.' Focus group discussions around patient interview outcomes identified triage, analgesia delivery, communication, and consideration of the environment as areas for improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

ED procedural sedation with propofol is generally very well accepted by patients and clinical staff but there is scope to improve patient-focus and increase satisfaction.

Therapeutic communication improves patient comfort during venipuncture in children: a single-blinded intervention study

The aim of this study was to examine whether therapeutic communication improves children's comfort during venipuncture compared to standard communication. This study was registered in the Dutch trial register (NL8221), December 10, 2019. This single-blinded interventional study was carried out in an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital. Inclusion criteria were age between 5 and 18 years, use of topical anesthesia (EMLA) and sufficient understanding of the Dutch language. 105 children were included, 51 assigned to the standard communication group (SC group) and 54 patients to the therapeutic communication group (TC group). The primary outcome measure was self-reported pain based on the Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R). Secondary outcome measures were observed pain (numeric rating scale (NRS)), self-reported/observed anxiety in child and parent (NRS), self-reported satisfaction in child, parent and medical personnel (NRS), and procedural time. No difference was found for self-reported pain. Self-reported and observed anxiety (by parents and medical personnel) was lower in the TC group (p-values ranged from p = 0.005 to p = 0.048). Procedural time was lower in the TC group (p = 0.011). Satisfaction level of medical personnel was higher in the TC group (p = 0.014).   Conclusion: TC during venipuncture did not result in lower self-reported pain. However, secondary outcomes (observed pain, anxiety and procedural time) were significantly improved in the TC group. What is Known: • Medical procedures, especially needle related procedures, cause anxiety and fear in children and adults. • In adults communication techniques based on hypnosis are effective in reducing pain and anxiety during medical procedures. What is New: • Our study found that with a small change in communication technique (called therapeutic communication or TC), the comfort of children during venipuncture improves. • This improved comfort was mainly reflected by reduced anxiety scores and shorter procedural time. This makes TC suitable for the outpatient setting.

The Management of Children and Youth With Pediatric Mental and Behavioral Health Emergencies

Mental and behavioral health (MBH) visits of children and youth to emergency departments are increasing in the United States. Reasons for these visits range from suicidal ideation, self-harm, and eating and substance use disorders to behavioral outbursts, aggression, and psychosis. Despite the increase in prevalence of these conditions, the capacity of the health care system to screen, diagnose, and manage these patients continues to decline. Several social determinants also contribute to great disparities in child and adolescent (youth) health, which affect MBH outcomes. In addition, resources and space for emergency physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and prehospital practitioners to manage these patients remain limited and inconsistent throughout the United States, as is financial compensation and payment for such services. This technical report discusses the role of physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners, and provides guidance for the management of acute MBH emergencies in children and youth. Unintentional ingestions and substance use disorder are not within the scope of this report and are not specifically discussed.

Turkish version of the 5-item Compassion Measurement Tool: A validity and reliability study

The aim of this methodological study with a cross-sectional design study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of the 5-item Compassion Measurement Tool. The sample was 402 patients in a university hospital. The Content Validity Index was 0.96. Total item correlation values were between 0.559 and 0.685. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.83. The scale could be used as five items, under a single factor as in the original version. A high correlation was found between patients' compassion perception and nursing care satisfaction scores. Turkish version of the 5-item Compassion Measurement Tool is a valid and reliable tool.

Nursing Home Resident, Family, and Staff Perspectives on Achieving Comfort at End of Life: A Qualitative Study

Increasing numbers of US older adults die in long-term care facilities. This qualitative study explored nursing home resident, family member, and staff perspectives and preferences regarding end-of-life care for the resident. From 67 potential participants referred by staff, 47 were found eligible and consented, including 16 residents, 10 family members, and 20 staff. A semistructured questionnaire guided the interview process and included questions such as what matters most at the end of life and whether participants would opt for any of the 8 aggressive treatments proposed for a resident at the end of life. Data were analyzed using descriptive and pattern coding for thematic interpretation. The 3 themes that emerged were centrality of comfort, what matters most at the end of life, and promoting comfort. All participant groups overwhelmingly endorsed comfort as a priority. Some participants would accept aggressive treatment to alleviate suffering and promote comfort. Residents were concerned about the well-being of their families, whereas family members emphasized the importance of their presence and that their dying relatives were not suffering. Staff sometimes filled this role on their behalf. Ancillary staff emphasized bathing, dressing, and grooming the resident to preserve the resident's dignity. The results support comfort as a priority for care at the end of life and the need for more discussion to increase mutual agreement on goals of care and what promotes comfort for the resident and family.

Perioperative Comfort and Discomfort: Transitioning From Epidural to Oral Pain Treatment After Pancreas Surgery: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

To explore patients' experiences of pain treatment in the perioperative period after surgery for pancreatic cancer.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design using semi-structured interviews.

METHODS

This study was a qualitative study based on 12 interviews. Participants were patients that had undergone surgery for pancreatic cancer. The interviews were conducted 1 to 2 days after the epidural was turned off, in a surgical department in Sweden. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. The Standard for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used for reporting the qualitative research study.

FINDINGS

The analysis of the transcribed interviews, generated one theme: Maintaining a sense of control in the perioperative phase, and two subthemes: (i) Sense of vulnerability and safety, and (ii) Sense of comfort and discomfort, were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants experienced comfort after pancreas surgery if they maintained a sense of control in the perioperative phase and when the epidural pain treatment provided pain relief without any side effects. The transition from epidural pain treatment to oral pain treatment with opioid tablets was experienced individually, from an almost unnoticed transition to the experience of severe pain, nausea, and fatigue. The sense of vulnerability and safety among the participants were affected by nursing care relationship and the environment on the ward.

Safe acceptance in the nurses' cultural care of medical tourists in Iran: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Medical tourism is traveling to another country to promote, restore and maintain health, recreation, and pleasure. There are different types of health tourism, including medical tourism, recovery tourism, and preventive tourism. This study aimed to explain safe acceptance in the nurses' cultural care of medical tourists in Iran.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, 18 semi-structured interviews were conducted with nurses, patients, and patients' relatives, who had been selected by purposeful sampling in 2021-2022. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed by conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis revealed that the main theme of this study was safe acceptance which included the five categories of trust building, safety, maintaining comfort and peace, stress control, and identifying patients' expectations.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that safe acceptance of cultural care was essential to medical tourism. Iranian nurses were aware of the factors that affected cultural care and the safe acceptance of medical tourists. Moreover, they carried out the necessary measures to achieve safe acceptance. In this regard, solutions such as developing a comprehensive and mandatory national qualification program and evaluating its periodic performance in this field are suggested.

Effectiveness and safety of implementing an enhanced patient comfort programme for elective neurosurgical patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Patient comfort is an important quality indicator of healthcare. According to Kolcaba's comfort theory, enhanced comfort is achieved by meeting the needs in four contexts: physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural and environmental. An enhanced patient comfort (EPC) programme based on this theory has been designed for elective neurosurgical patients. This study aims to assess its feasibility, effectiveness and safety.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The EPC programme patients will be evaluated in a single institutional randomised controlled trial. A total of 110 patients admitted for elective neurosurgery (including craniotomy, endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery and spine surgery) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to two groups. Patients in the EPC group are managed under the newly developed EPC programme, which aims to enhance patient experience and includes care coordination since admission (such as appointment of a care support coordinator, personalised setting, and cultural and spiritual support), preoperative management (such as lifestyle intervention, potential psychological and sleep intervention, and prerehabilitation), intraoperative and anaesthetic management (such as nurse coaching, music playing, and pre-emptive warming), postoperative management (such as early extubation, early diet advancement, mood and sleep management, and early ambulation) and optimised discharge planning; while those in the control group receive conventional perioperative care. The primary outcome is patient satisfaction and comfort measured by the Chinese Surgical Inpatient Satisfaction and Comfort Questionnaire. The secondary outcomes include postoperative morbidity and mortality, postoperative pain score, postoperative nausea and vomiting, functional recovery status (Karnofsky performance status and Quality of Recovery-15 score), mental status (anxiety and depression), nutritional status, health-related quality of life, hospital length of stay, reoperation and readmission rates, overall cost and patient experience.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval to conduct the study has been obtained from Institutional Review Board of Xi'an International Medical Center (No. 202028). The results will be presented at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Chinese clinical trial registry ChiCTR2000039983.

Interventions and practices using Comfort Theory of Kolcaba to promote adults' comfort: an evidence and gap map protocol of international effectiveness studies

BACKGROUND

Comfort is a primary patient objective and central to patient experience, and thus, maximising comfort is a universal goal for healthcare. However, comfort is a complex concept that is difficult to operationalise and evaluate, resulting in a lack of scientific and standardised comfort care practices. The Comfort Theory developed by Kolcaba has been the most widely known for its systematisation and projection and most of the global publications regarding comfort care were based on this theory. To develop international guidance on theory-informed comfort care, a better understanding about the evidence on the effects of interventions guided by the Comfort Theory is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To map and present the available evidence on the effects of interventions underpinned by Kolcaba's Comfort theory in healthcare settings.

METHODS

The mapping review will follow Campbell Evidence and Gap Maps guideline and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews Protocols guidelines. An intervention-outcome framework has been developed based on Comfort Theory and the classification of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions via consultation with stakeholders. Eleven electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Embase, AMED, Cochrane Library, JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI and Wan Fang) and grey literature sources (Google Scholar, Baidu Scholar and The Comfort Line) will be searched for primary studies and systematic reviews between 1991 and 2023 written in English and Chinese as the papers regarding Comfort Theory were first published in 1991. Additional studies will be identified by reference list review of included studies. Key authors will be contacted for unpublished or ongoing studies. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract data using piloted forms with discrepancies resolved by discussion with a third reviewer. A matrix map with filters of study characteristics will be generated and presented through software of EPPI-Mapper and NVivo.

DISCUSSION

More informed use of theory can strengthen improvement programmes and facilitate the evaluation of their effectiveness. Findings from the evidence and gap map will present the existing evidence base for researchers, practitioners and policy-makers and inform further research as well as clinical practices aiming at patients' comfort enhancement.

Hope-Based Program for Portuguese Outpatients with Advanced Chronic Illness in a Community Setting: A Randomized Control Trial

Background: Hope is widely considered a subjective phenomenon able to bring beneficial consequences to human health and existence. Maintaining hope amid a life-threatening disease and during palliative care is critical. The study aims to examine the effectiveness of a psychosocial supportive Hope Promotion Program (HPP) in enhancing hope, comfort, and quality of life in Portuguese adult outpatients with advanced and progressive chronic illness. Method: Using a parallel Randomized Control Trial (RCT) with pre-post design, 56 cancer outpatients from two day hospitals. Participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 28) or an intervention group (n = 28). The primary outcome measure was hope. Secondary measures included comfort and quality of life. Participants were assessed at baseline, day 15, and day 30 of follow-up. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the intervention group, there was a significant increase in the total hope scores after the HPP (day 15). Significant differences were still present after one month (p < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in comfort and quality of life scores in the intervention group one month after HPP (p = 0.018). Conclusions: The HPP may be an effective intervention to increase hope and improve comfort and quality of life among palliative patients. Future studies should increase sample size, diversify settings, and include longer and more detailed follow-ups.

Nurses' comfort care of transarterial chemoembolization patients based on their perceptions around postembolization syndrome and symptom interference

AIM

Post-embolization syndrome is a common adverse event following trans-arterial chemoembolization, which negatively impacts the daily life of the patients involved. This study examined whether perceptions around post-embolization syndrome and symptom interference among nurses affect their comfort care performance toward patients who have undergone this procedure.

DESIGN

A descriptive cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty registered nurses were surveyed from September to November 2020. Perceived post-embolization syndrome, symptom interference, and comfort care (including physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental dimensions) were measured. Data were analyzed using t-tests, analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation, and a multivariate analysis of variance.

RESULTS

There were no individual effects found of perceived post-embolization syndrome or symptom interference on nurses' comfort care performance. However, statistically significant interaction effects were found in terms of their sociocultural and environmental care.

CONCLUSION

Nurses who recognized both high post-embolization syndrome and symptom interference among their patients were found to provide greater sociocultural and environmental care. As such, nurses should improve their early symptom and symptom interference detection protocols based on current care guidelines and provide physical, psychospiritual, sociocultural, and environmental comfort care.

Impact of discriminant factors on the comfort-care of nurses caring for trans-arterial chemoembolisation patients

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to identify the levels of comfort-care provided by trans-arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) nurses and examine the discriminant factors thereof.

METHODS

Nurses (n = 146) with experience in caring for TACE patients, participated in this study. The data were collected using an online self-rated questionnaire and analysed with descriptive statistics and discriminant analysis. The discriminating factors included perception of post-embolisation syndrome and symptom interference, caring attitude, barriers to pain and nausea/vomiting management, and supportive care competence.

RESULTS

The participants were classified into three groups, depending on the level of their comfort-care: "low" (n = 27), "moderate" (n = 88), and "high" (n = 31) comfort-care groups. One function significantly discriminated between the low and high comfort-care groups and correctly classified 79.3% of the participants in the cross-validation run. Supportive care competence (0.864), caring attitude (0.685), perception of symptom interference (0.395), perception of post-embolisation syndrome (0.321), and barriers to nausea/vomiting management (- 0.343) were significant discriminant factors of comfort-care.

CONCLUSION

A low proportion of the participants provided high levels of comfort-care, which was determined by five discriminant factors. The study's findings imply that the development of supportive care competence, authentic human caring attitude, early detection of patients' symptoms and symptom interference, and the development of manuals and guidelines for removing barriers for nausea and vomiting are needed to improve the comfort-care of nurses caring for TACE patients.

Effect of New Nursing on Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction

Objective. To explore the effect of the comfortable intervention-based nursing mode under the quality nursing intervention combined with Internet mobile health on the quality of life (QOL) and psychological status of patients with acute cerebral infarction (ACI). Methods. 90 ACI patients treated in our hospital (June 2019-June 2020) were chosen and equally split into the experimental group (EG) and control group (CG) according to the order of admission. CG received routine nursing, while EG received the comfortable intervention-based nursing mode under the quality nursing intervention combined with Internet mobile health to compare the clinical indexes between the two groups. Results. Compared with CG, EG after intervention achieved obviously higher SS-QOL, ESCA, and GCQ scores ( $P<0.001$ ), and lower MSSNS and NIHSS scores ( $P<0.001$ ). Conclusion. The application of the comfortable intervention-based nursing mode under the quality nursing intervention combined with Internet mobile health effectively improves QOL and alleviates the negative emotions of patients. Compared with routine nursing, this model has higher application value, and further research of the joint intervention will help build better a solution for patients.

Comfort During Non-invasive Ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been shown to be effective in avoiding intubation and improving survival in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) when compared to conventional oxygen therapy. However, NIV is associated with high failure rates due, in most cases, to patient discomfort. Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to all those interventions aimed at enhancing patient's tolerance to NIV. Several practical aspects have been considered to improve patient adaptation. In particular, the choice of the interface and the ventilatory setting adopted for NIV play a key role in the success of respiratory assistance. Among the different NIV interfaces, tolerance is poorest for the nasal and oronasal masks, while helmet appears to be better tolerated, resulting in longer use and lower NIV failure rates. The choice of fixing system also significantly affects patient comfort due to pain and possible pressure ulcers related to the device. The ventilatory setting adopted for NIV is associated with varying degrees of patient comfort: patients are more comfortable with pressure-support ventilation (PSV) than controlled ventilation. Furthermore, the use of electrical activity of the diaphragm (EADi)-driven ventilation has been demonstrated to improve patient comfort when compared to PSV, while reducing neural drive and effort. If non-pharmacological remedies fail, sedation can be employed to improve patient's tolerance to NIV. Sedation facilitates ventilation, reduces anxiety, promotes sleep, and modulates physiological responses to stress. Judicious use of sedation may be an option to increase the chances of success in some patients at risk for intubation because of NIV intolerance consequent to pain, discomfort, claustrophobia, or agitation. During the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, NIV has been extensively employed to face off the massive request for ventilatory assistance. Prone positioning in non-intubated awake COVID-19 patients may improve oxygenation, reduce work of breathing, and, possibly, prevent intubation. Despite these advantages, maintaining prone position can be particularly challenging because poor comfort has been described as the main cause of prone position discontinuation. In conclusion, comfort is one of the major determinants of NIV success. All the strategies aimed to increase comfort during NIV should be pursued.