Single group multisite safety trial of sibling cord blood cell infusion to children with cerebral palsy: study protocol and rationale

A systematic review of cell therapy modalities and outcomes in cerebral palsy

Cerebral palsy is widely recognized as a condition that results in significant physical and cognitive disabilities. Interventions aim to improve the quality of life and reduce disability. Despite numerous treatments and significant advancements, cerebral palsy remains incurable due to its diverse origins. This review evaluated clinical trials, studies, and case reports on various cell therapy approaches for cerebral palsy. It assessed the clinical outcomes of applying different cell types, including mesenchymal stem cells, olfactory ensheathing cells, neural stem/progenitor cells, macrophages, and mononuclear cells derived from peripheral blood, cord blood, and bone marrow. In 60 studies involving 1474 CP patients, six major adverse events (0.41%) and 485 mild adverse events (32.9%) were reported. Favorable therapeutic effects were observed in 54 out of 60 cell therapy trials, indicating a promising potential for cell treatments in cerebral palsy. Intrathecal MSC and BM-MNC applications revealed therapeutic benefits, with MSC studies being generally safer than other cell therapies. However, MSC and BM-MNC trials have shown inconsistent results, with some demonstrating superior efficacy for certain outcomes. Cell dosage, transplantation route, and frequency of administration can affect the efficacy of these therapies. Our findings highlight the promise of cell therapies for improving cerebral palsy treatment and stress the need for ongoing research to refine treatment protocols and enhance safety. To establish conclusive evidence on the comparative effectiveness of various cell types in treating cerebral palsy, randomized, double-blind clinical trials are essential.

Stem Cell Therapy in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy: a Bibliometric Analysis and New Strategy

The aim of this study was to identify related scientific outputs and emerging topics of stem cells in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (NHIE) and cerebral palsy (CP) through bibliometrics and literature review. All relevant publications on stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP were screened from websites and analyzed research trends. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were applied to visualize and quantitatively analyze the published literature to provide objective presentation and prediction. In addition, the clinical trials, published articles, and projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China associated with stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP were summarized. A total of 294 publications were associated with stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP. Most publications and citations came from the USA and China. Monash University and University Medical Center Utrecht produced the most publications. Pediatric research published the most studies on stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP. Heijnen C and Kavelaars A published the most articles. Cluster analyses show that current research trend is more inclined toward the repair mechanism and clinical translation of stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP. By summarizing various studies of stem cells in NHIE and CP, it is indicated that this research direction is a hot topic at present. Furthermore, organoid transplantation, as an emerging and new therapeutic approach, brings new hope for the treatment of NHIE and CP. This study comprehensively summarized and analyzed the research trend of global stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP. It has shown a marked increase in stem cell therapy for NHIE and CP research. In the future, more efforts will be made on exploring stem cell or organoid therapy for NHIE and CP and more valuable related mechanisms of action to achieve clinical translation as soon as possible.

Feasibility of cord blood collection for autologous cell therapy applications in extremely preterm infants

BACKGROUND AIMS

Umbilical cord blood (UCB)-derived cells show strong promise as a treatment for neonatal brain injury in pre-clinical models and early-phase clinical trials. Feasibility of UCB collection and autologous administration is reported for term infants, but data are limited for preterm infants. Here the authors assessed the feasibility of UCB-derived cell collection for autologous use in extremely preterm infants born at less than 28 weeks, a population with a high incidence of brain injury and subsequent neurodisability.

METHODS

In a prospective study at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia, UCB was collected from infants born at less than 28 weeks and processed to obtain total nucleated cells (TNCs), CD34+ cells, mononuclear cells and cell viability via fluorescence-activated cell sorting prior to cryopreservation. Feasibility was pre-defined as volume adequate for cryopreservation (>9 mL UCB collected) and >25 × 10⁶ TNCs/kg retrieved.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight infants (21 male, 17 female) were included in the study. Twenty-four (63.1%) were delivered via cesarean section, 30 (78.9%) received delayed cord clamping before collection and 11 (28.9%) were a multiple birth. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) gestational age was 26.0 weeks (24.5-27.5) and mean (standard deviation) birth weight was 761.5 g (221.5). Median (IQR) UCB volume collected was 19.1 mL/kg (10.5-23.5), median (IQR) TNC count was 105.2 × 10⁶/kg (57.4-174.4), median (IQR) CD34+ cell count was 1.5 × 10⁶/kg (0.6-2.1) and median (IQR) cell viability pre-cryopreservation was 95% (92.1-96.0). Feasibility of collection volume and cell count suitable for cell cryopreservation was achieved in 27 (71%) and 28 (73.6%) infants, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

UCB-derived cell collection adequate for cryopreservation and subsequent autologous reinfusion was achieved in 70% of extremely preterm infants. Extremely preterm UCB demonstrated a higher CD34+:TNC ratio compared with published full-term values. Recruitment to demonstrate safety of UCB cell administration in extremely premature infants is ongoing in the CORD-SAFE study (trial registration no. ACTRN12619001637134).

Umbilical Cord Blood Cell Clearance Post-Infusion in Immune-Competent Children with Cerebral Palsy

Umbilical cord blood cells have therapeutic potential for neurological disorders, through a paracrine mechanism of action. A greater understanding of the safety and immunological effects of allogeneic donor cord blood cells in the context of a healthy recipient immune system, such as in cerebral palsy, is needed. This study aimed to determine how quickly donor cord blood cells were cleared from the circulation in children with cerebral palsy who received a single intravenous infusion of 12/12 human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling cord blood cells. Twelve participants with cerebral palsy aged 2-12 years received cord blood cell infusions as part of a phase I trial of umbilical blood infusion for cerebral palsy. Digital droplet PCR analysis of DNA copy number variants specific to donor and recipient was used to assess donor DNA clearance at five timepoints post-infusion, a surrogate measure of cell clearance. Donor cells were cleared by 3 months post-infusion in 11/12 participants. When detected, donor DNA was at a fraction of 0.01-0.31% of total DNA with no signs of graft-versus-host disease in any participant. The donor DNA clearance times provided by this study have important implications for understanding the safety of allogeneic cord blood cell infusion for cerebral palsy and translational tissue engineering or regenerative medicine research in other disorders.

Umbilical Cord Blood and Cord Tissue-Derived Cell Therapies for Neonatal Morbidities: Current Status and Future Challenges

Cell therapies are an emerging focus for neonatal research, with benefits documented for neonatal respiratory, neurological, and cardiac conditions in pre-clinical studies. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) and umbilical cord (UC) tissue-derived cell therapy is particularly appealing for preventative or regenerative treatment of neonatal morbidities; they are a resource that can be collected at birth and used as an autologous or allogeneic therapy. Moreover, UCB contains a diverse mix of stem and progenitor cells that demonstrate paracrine actions to mitigate damaging inflammatory, immune, oxidative stress, and cell death pathways in several organ systems. In the past decade, published results from early-phase clinical studies have explored the use of these cells as a therapeutic intervention in neonates. We present a systematic review of published and registered clinical trials of UCB and cord tissue-derived cell therapies for neonatal morbidities. This search yielded 12 completed clinical studies: 7 were open-label phase I and II safety and feasibility trials, 3 were open-label dose-escalation trials, 1 was a open-label placebo-controlled trial, and 1 was a phase II randomized controlled trial. Participants totaled 206 infants worldwide; 123 (60%) were full-term infants and 83 (40%) were preterm. A majority (64.5%) received cells via an intravenous route; however, 54 (26.2%) received cells via intratracheal administration, 10 (4.8%) intraoperative cardiac injection, and 9 (4.3%) by direct intraventricular (brain) injection. Assessment of efficacy to date is limited given completed studies have principally been phase I and II safety studies. A further 24 trials investigating UCB and UC-derived cell therapies in neonates are currently registered.

Education can improve clinician confidence in information sharing and willingness to refer to stem cell clinical trials for cerebral palsy

To progress stem cell therapies for cerebral palsy, clinicians need to openly engage with patients about emerging evidence and be willing to refer to relevant clinical trials, if and when appropriate. To assess whether education can change clinicians' confidence in information sharing and willingness to refer to relevant clinical trials, an online questionnaire was distributed at a scientific conference before and after a professional workshop on cell therapies for cerebral palsy. Of the 42 participants who completed the survey, 26 self-identified as clinicians. Of these, 81% had had patients ask about stem cells, yet in the pre-workshop questionnaire indicated they were not confident answering questions about cell therapies. Clinicians were most commonly asked about stem cell treatments provided by private clinics, stem cell research and current evidence. Post-workshop, knowledge and confidence regarding stem cells, as well as likelihood to refer to clinical trials using therapies with a strong evidence base (eg, umbilical cord blood/placental cells), significantly increased (p<0.001). This study highlights that by offering resources and education, clinician confidence and willingness to refer to cell therapy trials can improve; this may help drive the stem cell research landscape and support patient decision-making.

Safety of allogeneic umbilical cord blood infusions for the treatment of neurological conditions: a systematic review of clinical studies

BACKGROUND AIMS

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) infusion is being investigated as a treatment for a range of neurological conditions, primarily because of its potent immunomodulatory effects mediated via paracrine signaling. Although initial research mainly utilized autologous UCB, allogeneic samples from a sibling or unrelated donor have now become more common. With the use of allogeneic UCB, questions have arisen surrounding the necessity for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching, preparative regimens and immunosuppressant drugs. To investigate the safety of allogeneic UCB for the treatment of neurological conditions and the impact of HLA mismatching and immunosuppresion, the authors conducted a systematic review of the safety of allogeneic UCB infusion for neurological conditions.

METHODS

A systematic review of published and gray literature was conducted to investigate the safety of allogeneic UCB infusions for neurological conditions.

RESULTS

Authors identified 10 studies using allogeneic UCB to treat autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, stroke, traumatic brain injury and various other conditions. A total of 361 participants (with at least 442 UCB infusions) received a range of HLA-matched/untyped allogeneic units and cell doses, with the majority not administered post-infusion immunosuppression. There were no reported serious adverse events definitely or probably related to the allogeneic UCB infusion, nor later potential complications such as graft-versus-host disease or teratoma formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although variability between studies is high, the available data do not identify safety concerns with allogeneic UCB infusion for the treatment of neurological conditions, even with variable HLA matching or no immunosuppression.