1
|
Harwood RH, Goldberg SE, Brand A, van Der Wardt V, Booth V, Di Lorito C, Hoare Z, Hancox J, Bajwa R, Burgon C, Howe L, Cowley A, Bramley T, Long A, Lock J, Tucker R, Adams EJ, O'Brien R, Kearney F, Kowalewska K, Godfrey M, Dunlop M, Junaid K, Thacker S, Duff C, Welsh T, Haddon-Silver A, Gladman J, Logan P, Pollock K, Vedhara K, Hood V, Das Nair R, Smith H, Tudor-Edwards R, Hartfiel N, Ezeofor V, Vickers R, Orrell M, Masud T. Promoting Activity, Independence, and Stability in Early Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (PrAISED): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2023; 382:e074787. [PMID: 37643788 PMCID: PMC10463053 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of an exercise and functional activity therapy intervention in adults with early dementia or mild cognitive impairment compared with usual care. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Participants' homes and communities at five sites in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS 365 adults with early dementia or mild cognitive impairment who were living at home, and family members or carers. INTERVENTION The intervention, Promoting activity, Independence, and Stability in Early Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (PrAISED), was a specially designed, dementia specific, rehabilitation programme focusing on strength, balance, physical activity, and performance of activities of daily living, which was tailored and progressive and addressed risk and the psychological needs of people with dementia. Up to 50 therapy sessions were provided over 12 months. The control group received usual care plus a falls risk assessment. Procedures were adapted during the covid-19 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was score on the carer (informant) reported disability assessment for dementia scale 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were self-reported activities of daily living, physical activity, quality of life, balance, functional mobility, fear of falling, frailty, cognition, mood, carer strain, service use at 12 months, and falls between months 4 and 15. RESULTS 365 patient participants were randomised, 183 to intervention and 182 to control. The median age of participants was 80 years (range 65-95), median Montreal cognitive assessment score was 20 out of 30 (range 13-26), and 58% (n=210) were men. Intervention participants received a median of 31 therapy sessions (interquartile range 22-40) and reported completing a mean 121 minutes of PrAISED exercise each week. Primary outcome data were available for 149 intervention and 141 control participants. Scores on the disability assessment for dementia scale did not differ between groups: adjusted mean difference -1.3, 95% confidence interval -5.2 to 2.6; Cohen's d effect size -0.06, 95% confidence interval -0.26 to 0.15; P=0.51). Upper 95% confidence intervals excluded small to moderate effects on any of the range of outcome measures. Between months 4 and 15 the intervention group experienced 79 falls and the control group 200 falls (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.3; P=0.3). CONCLUSION The intensive PrAISED programme of exercise and functional activity training did not improve activities of daily living, physical activity, or quality of life; reduce falls; or improve any other secondary health status outcomes, despite good uptake. Future research should consider alternative approaches to maintaining ability and wellbeing in people with dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15320670.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan H Harwood
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah E Goldberg
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Andrew Brand
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Veronika van Der Wardt
- Department of General, Preventative and Rehabilitation Medicine, Philipps-Universität Marburg 35032 Marburg, Germany
| | - Vicky Booth
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claudio Di Lorito
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Jennie Hancox
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Rupinder Bajwa
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Clare Burgon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Louise Howe
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alison Cowley
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Trevor Bramley
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Gamston, Nottingham, UK
| | - Annabelle Long
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Juliette Lock
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachael Tucker
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Emma J Adams
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Rebecca O'Brien
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Fiona Kearney
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Katarzyna Kowalewska
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Kehinde Junaid
- Mental Health Services for Older People, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Highbury Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Thacker
- Centre for Research and Development, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Kingsway Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Carol Duff
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | - Tomas Welsh
- The RICE Centre, Research Institute for the Care of Older People, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | - Annette Haddon-Silver
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pip Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Kavita Vedhara
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Victoria Hood
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Gamston, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roshan Das Nair
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- SINTEF, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Helen Smith
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Gamston, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor-Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Ned Hartfiel
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Victory Ezeofor
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Robert Vickers
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Martin Orrell
- Mental Health Services for Older People, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Highbury Hospital, Nottingham, UK
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tahir Masud
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim H, Choi H, Jung YI, Kim E, Lee W, Yi JY. Evaluation of a technology-enhanced, integrated community health and wellness program for seniors (HWePS): protocol of a non-randomized comparison trial. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:25. [PMID: 36604644 PMCID: PMC9813466 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14921-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthy aging for all in the community is a shared public health agenda for countries with aging populations, but there is a lack of empirical evidence on community-wide preventive models that promote the health of older people residing in socially-disadvantaged communities. The Health and Wellness Program for Seniors (HWePS) is a technology-enhanced, multi-level, integrated health equity intervention model. This study evaluates the effect of the HWePS on the health and well-being of older adults residing in urban, low-income communities. METHODS/DESIGN: HWePS is a prospective, non-randomized comparison trial conducted in an intervention and a control neighborhood (dong) in Seoul, South Korea, over 12 months. Older people who reside in the small areas and meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria are eligible to participate. The multi-level, multi-faceted HWePS intervention is a preventive community care model for older residents guided by the expanded chronic care model, the comprehensive health literacy intervention model, and the Systems for Person-centered Elder Care model along with health equity frameworks. HWePS consists of four components: a health literacy intervention based on individual and community needs assessments, personalized (self-)care management featuring nurse coaching and peer support, a healthy-living and healthy-aging community initiative, and information and communication technology (ICT) systems. The primary outcomes are self-reported health and health-related quality of life. Outcome assessors and data analysts are blinded to group assignment. Process evaluation will be also conducted. DISCUSSION As a multi-level health equity project, HWePS has adopted a novel study design that simultaneously targets individual- and community-level factors known to contribute to health inequality in later life in the community. The study will provide insights into the effectiveness and implementation process of an integrated, multi-level, preventive community care model, which in turn can help improve the health outcomes of older residents and reduce disparities in underserved urban communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN29103760. Registered 2 September 2021, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN29103760.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongsoo Kim
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea ,grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea ,grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Seoul National University Institute of Aging, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyoungshim Choi
- grid.443782.e0000 0004 0647 3634College of Nursing, Hansei University, 30 Hansei-Ro, Gunpo-Shi, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea
| | - Young-il Jung
- Department of Environmental Health, National Open University, 86 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eunji Kim
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woojoo Lee
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Yoon Yi
- grid.31501.360000 0004 0470 5905Department of Public Health Science, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-Ro, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Arthur P, Li CY. Living with Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey Informing the American Experience. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2022; 6:733-737. [PMID: 36654924 PMCID: PMC9741745 DOI: 10.3233/adr-220085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Persons living with dementia and their caregivers are among society's most vulnerable, a condition exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This national survey was conducted with dementia caregivers in the US. Primary outcomes targeted pandemic-related changes in cognitive, behavioral, and motors systems. 113 dementia caregivers from 30 US states completed the survey. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on persons living with dementia and their caregivers is substantial in comparison to society at large. A marked public health and preventative role signals opportunity for practitioners to fill the void and prepare for future public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Arthur
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN, USA,Correspondence to: Paul Arthur, PhD, OTR, Assistant Professor & Chair, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Southern Indiana, 8600 University Blvd., Evansville, IN 47712, USA. Tel.: +1 812 492 7815; E-mail:
| | - Chih-Ying Li
- Departmentof Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daley S, Akarsu N, Armsby E, Farina N, Feeney Y, Fine B, Hughes L, Pooley J, Tabet N, Towson G, Banerjee S. What factors have influenced quality of life in people with dementia and their family carers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e053563. [PMID: 35144951 PMCID: PMC8845096 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant disruption to health and social care services. For people with dementia and their family carers this is problematic, as a group who rely on timely and responsive services to live well with the condition. This study has sought to understand how COVID-19 has affected the quality of life of people diagnosed with dementia and their family carers. DESIGN Our mixed-methods study was nested in a larger cohort study of an education programme, Time for Dementia. SETTING The study took place in the South-East of England. PARTICIPANTS Existing study participants, family carers were approached about the COVID-19 nested study. A purposeful sample of participants were invited to take part in in-depth qualitative interview. The sample included family carers in a range of different caring situations. MEASUREMENT Interviews were undertaken remotely by telephone. Interviews sought to understand quality of life before the pandemic, impact of the restrictions on both the person with dementia and family carer, role of services and other agencies as well as supportive factors. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS 16 family carers were interviewed. Seven themes were identified from our analysis: (1) decreased social interaction; (2) reduced support; (3) deteriorating cognitive and physical health for the person with dementia; (4) decreased carer well-being; (5) difficulties understanding COVID-19 restrictions; (6) limited impact for some and (7) trust and relationship with care home. There was little change between themes during the first and second wave of national lockdowns. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides an understanding the short-term impact of COVID-19 on the quality of life of people with dementia and their family carers. Our findings suggest that recovery between the first and second wave of the restrictions did not automatically take place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Daley
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Nazire Akarsu
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Elise Armsby
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Nicolas Farina
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Yvonne Feeney
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Bethany Fine
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Laura Hughes
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Joanna Pooley
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Naji Tabet
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Sube Banerjee
- Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hall J, Bingham DD, Seims A, Dogra SA, Burkhardt J, Nobles J, McKenna J, Bryant M, Barber SE, Daly-Smith A. A whole system approach to increasing children's physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:2296. [PMID: 34922508 PMCID: PMC8684063 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12255-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging in regular physical activity requires continued complex decision-making in varied and dynamic individual, social and structural contexts. Widespread shortfalls of physical activity interventions suggests the complex underlying mechanisms of change are not yet fully understood. More insightful process evaluations are needed to design and implement more effective approaches. This paper describes the protocol for a process evaluation of the JU:MP programme, a whole systems approach to increasing physical activity in children and young people aged 5-14 years in North Bradford, UK. METHODS This process evaluation, underpinned by realist philosophy, aims to understand the development and implementation of the JU:MP programme and the mechanisms by which JU:MP influences physical activity in children and young people. It also aims to explore behaviour change across wider policy, strategy and neighbourhood systems. A mixed method data collection approach will include semi-structured interview, observation, documentary analysis, surveys, and participatory evaluation methods including reflections and ripple effect mapping. DISCUSSION This protocol offers an innovative approach on the use of process evaluation feeding into an iterative programme intended to generate evidence-based practice and deliver practice-based evidence. This paper advances knowledge regarding the development of process evaluations for evaluating systems interventions, and emphasises the importance of process evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hall
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK. .,Faculties of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
| | - Daniel D Bingham
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.,Faculties of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Amanda Seims
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.,Faculties of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Sufyan Abid Dogra
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.,Faculties of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Jan Burkhardt
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - James Nobles
- The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jim McKenna
- School of Sport, Carnegie, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS6 3QT, UK
| | - Maria Bryant
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.,The Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Sally E Barber
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.,Faculties of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Andy Daly-Smith
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.,Faculties of Life Sciences and Health Studies, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.,Centre for Applied Education Research, Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Masterson-Algar P, Allen MC, Hyde M, Keating N, Windle G. Exploring the impact of Covid-19 on the care and quality of life of people with dementia and their carers: A scoping review. DEMENTIA 2021. [PMCID: PMC8811334 DOI: 10.1177/14713012211053971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
This article reports on findings of a scoping review aimed to map the published literature concerning the impact of Covid-19 on the care and quality of life of people living with dementia and their carers. Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. Three overarching themes were identified: (1) Impact on people with dementia – unmet and increased care needs; (2) Impact on carers – increased stress and burden and (3) Impact according to demographics. Overall, findings show that Covid-19 has led to a reduction in support from health and social services and to a move towards technology-based support. Furthermore, Covid-19 has had a negative impact on the care and quality of life of people living with dementia and their carers, and that this impact was influenced by the severity of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martin Hyde
- Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom
| | - Norah Keating
- Centre for Innovative Ageing, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom; North-West University, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Gill Windle
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu KY, Howard R, Banerjee S, Comas‐Herrera A, Goddard J, Knapp M, Livingston G, Manthorpe J, O'Brien JT, Paterson RW, Robinson L, Rossor M, Rowe JB, Sharp DJ, Sommerlad A, Suárez‐González A, Burns A. Dementia wellbeing and COVID-19: Review and expert consensus on current research and knowledge gaps. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:1597-1639. [PMID: 34043836 PMCID: PMC8237017 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In response to a commissioned research update on dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic, a UK-based working group, comprising dementia researchers from a range of fields and disciplines, aimed to describe the impact of the pandemic on dementia wellbeing and identify priorities for future research. METHODS We supplemented a rapid literature search (including unpublished, non-peer reviewed and ongoing studies/reports) on dementia wellbeing in the context of COVID-19 with expert group members' consensus about future research needs. From this we generated potential research questions the group judged to be relevant that were not covered by the existing literature. RESULTS Themes emerged from 141 studies within the six domains of the NHS England COVID-19 Dementia Wellbeing Pathway: Preventing Well, Diagnosing Well, Treating Well, Supporting Well, Living Well and Dying Well. We describe current research findings and knowledge gaps relating to the impact on people affected by dementia (individuals with a diagnosis, their carers and social contacts, health and social care practitioners and volunteers), services, research activities and organisations. Broad themes included the potential benefits and risks of new models of working including remote healthcare, the need for population-representative longitudinal studies to monitor longer-term impacts, and the importance of reporting dementia-related findings within broader health and care studies. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionately negative impact on people affected by dementia. Researchers and funding organisations have responded rapidly to try to understand the impacts. Future research should highlight and resolve outstanding questions to develop evidence-based measures to improve the quality of life of people affected by dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Y. Liu
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Adelina Comas‐Herrera
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceCare Policy and Evaluation CentreLondonUK
| | - Joanne Goddard
- Economic and Social Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationSwindonUK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceCare Policy and Evaluation CentreLondonUK
| | | | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care WorkforceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - John T. O'Brien
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineCambridgeUK
| | - Ross W. Paterson
- Dementia Research CentreQueen Square UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences InstituteFaculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastleUK
| | - Martin Rossor
- Dementia Research CentreQueen Square UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - James B. Rowe
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK,Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - David J. Sharp
- Department of Brain SciencesImperial College LondonLondonUK,UK Dementia Research InstituteCare Research and Technology Centre, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Aida Suárez‐González
- Dementia Research CentreQueen Square UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Alistair Burns
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental PsychologyThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Lorito C, Masud T, Gladman J, Godfrey M, Dunlop M, Bosco A, Harwood RH. Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: qualitative study from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:529. [PMID: 34620129 PMCID: PMC8495442 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02451-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Restrictions introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic led to increased risk of deconditioning in the general population. No empirical evidence of this effect however has been gathered in people living with dementia. This study aims to identify the causes and effects of COVID-19-related deconditioning in people living with dementia. Methods This is a longitudinal phenomenological qualitative study. Participants living with dementia, their caregivers and therapists involved in the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic were qualitatively interviewed at two time points: the baseline 2 months after the national lockdown was imposed in England (i.e., May 2020), the follow up 2 months after the first set (i.e. July 2020). The data were analysed through deductive thematic analysis. Results Twenty-four participants living with dementia, 19 caregivers and 15 therapists took part in the study. Two themes were identified: Causes of deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic and effects of deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic. A self-reinforcing pattern was common, whereby lockdown made the person apathetic, demotivated, socially disengaged, and frailer. This reduced activity levels, which in turn reinforced the effects of deconditioning over time. Without external supporters, most participants lacked the motivation / cognitive abilities to keep active. Provided the proper infrastructure and support, some participants could use tele-rehabilitation to combat deconditioning. Conclusion The added risks and effects of deconditioning on people with dementia require considerable efforts from policy makers and clinicians to ensure that they initiate and maintain physical activity in prolonged periods of social distancing. Delivering rehabilitation in the same way as before the pandemic might not be feasible or sustainable and innovative approaches must be found. Digital support for this population has shown promising results but remains a challenge. Trial registration The PrAISED trial and process evaluation have received ethical approval number 18/YH/0059 from the Bradford/Leeds Ethics Committee. The ISRCTN Registration Number for PrAISED is 15320670.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Di Lorito
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
| | - Tahir Masud
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Rd, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Maureen Godfrey
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Marianne Dunlop
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| | - Alessandro Bosco
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rowan H Harwood
- Division of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK
| |
Collapse
|