Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

A real-life evaluation of SNOT-22 domains in a cohort of CRSwNP patients treated with biologic therapies for 12 months

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory disorder associated with rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, nasal congestion, hyposmia, anosmia, and facial pain or pressure for over 12 weeks. This study examines the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) score and its relationship to nasal, otologyc, sleep and emotional domains in CRSwNP patients during the first year of biologics treatment, comparing the pre-biologics score to that at 1, 6, and 12 months in a cohort of 59 patients with CRSwNP.

METHODS

We included 59 patients with CRSwNP (with or without asthma) who received add on therapy with targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). At each visit we administered the SNOT-22 questionnaire and both total score and single domains scores were recorded.

RESULTS

In this real-life, observational study, we found a significant SNOT-22 total score reduction for patients treated with anti-IgE after 1 month, but this significant difference was not maintained at 6 or 12 months compared with the baseline. The use of anti-interleukin 5/5R (IL5/5R) leads to a significant reduction of the SNOT-22 total score after 1 month, which is maintained after 6 months but not at 12 months compared with the baseline. The use of an anti-interleukin 13/4R (IL13/4R) leads to a statistically significant reduction of the SNOT-22 score after 1 month of therapy, which is maintained after 6 and 12 months compared with the baseline. When examining the single domains, we observed that patients who received anti-IL13/4R treatment demonstrated a significant reduction in each domain at each time point (T) compared to the baseline. Patients who received anti-IL5/5R treatment demonstrated an improvement in the nasal domain at each T compared to the baseline. However, the improvement in the otologyc domain was not sustained after 12 months. Similarly, the sleep domain remained unchanged, and the emotional domain only improved significantly after 12 months. Similarly, there was a reduction of the emotional domain in patients treated with anti-IgE.

CONCLUSION

Our real-life study describes the kinetics over the first year of treatment with mAbs in CRSwNP, showing different patterns in reducing symptoms and improving Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). SNOT-22 with the factorial division in 4 domains can help distinguish fast responders from low or non-responders to a mAb based on clinical response after 1 month and more accurately assign the right mAb to the right patient.

Dupilumab Effectiveness in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma Non-Responsive to Omalizumab

Background/Objectives: Severe allergic asthma is usually treated with omalizumab; however, this drug may not be effective for every patient. By its action, dupilumab could be an alternative in these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with severe allergic asthma, non-responsive to omalizumab, according to the maintenance of their oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose, an exacerbation rate decrease, or poor control of the disease, despite optimized treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from severe asthma clinics was performed, observing the efficacy of the switch to dupilumab in patients who experienced a failed treatment with omalizumab. Results: Forty-two patients were included. Dupilumab proved to be effective in patients who experienced a failed omalizumab treatment, with a significant reduction in the exacerbation number and OCS use. Furthermore, remission of the disease, according to the Severe Asthma Network of Italy (SANI) criteria, was achieved in 35 patients, with complete remission in 19 (45%) and partial remission in 16 (38%). The analysis of the predictors of the success of dupilumab therapy in achieving clinical remission, through univariate analysis of the data at baseline, showed that complete remission was more easily reached in patients with concomitant aspirin (ASA) intolerance or in those with nasal polyposis. Conclusions: Dupilumab is an effective drug for the treatment of patients with severe asthma with an allergic component, with better benefits in patients with an ASA intolerance or nasal polyposis.

Olfactory Dysfunction in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Effect of Treatment with Emphasis on Biological Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Olfactory dysfunction significantly impacts quality of life that affects a majority of the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The aim of this review is to explore the impact of various treatment regimens on olfactory dysfunction in patients diagnosed with CRSwNP.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accurate assessment of olfactory dysfunction remains challenging and should incorporate both psychophysical tests and patient-reported outcomes. Patients with CRSwNP appear capable of reliably evaluating their olfactory function. Standard treatment such as intranasal corticosteroids and surgery have limited capability of restoring the sense of smell. Oral corticosteroids have a far greater potency, albeit short-lived and at the cost of adverse events and side effects. Recent studies on registered biological agents- specifically dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab- indicate their effectiveness in restoring olfactory function in severe CRSwNP. According to meta-analyses and indirect comparisons, dupilumab shows superiority; however, direct comparative studies are necessary.

Budesonide aqueous nasal spray: an updated review in managing chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a frequent medical condition. Type 2 inflammation signs CRSwNP in western countries. Type 2 inflammation leads to nasal airflow limitation. Budesonide aqueous nasal spray (BANS) is an intranasal corticosteroid (INCS); it has been launched in the early 1980s. BANS is indicated for treating allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, and nasal polyps (both as treatment and prevention after surgery). Consolidated evidence documented its efficacy in treating CRSwNP. In addition, BANS is safe with negligible local and systemic side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with CRSwNP recommend using INCS as the first line in many situations. In particular, patients may assess the perception of symptoms' severity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score >5/10 means uncontrolled symptoms in both diseases and requires adequate treatment. BANS could appropriately be used in patients with uncontrolled symptoms and/or moderate/severe nasal obstruction. In addition, BANS may adequately integrate surgery and biologics for CRSwNP management. In conclusion, BANS represents a valuable option in managing patients with type 2-mediated CRSwNP.

A Comparison of Natural and Therapeutic Anti-IgE Antibodies

Immunoglobulin E (IgE) plays a critical role for the immune system, fighting against parasites, toxins, and cancer. However, when it reacts to allergens without proper regulation, it can cause allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, through a process initiated by effector cells such as basophils and mast cells. These cells display IgE on their surface, bound to the high-affinity IgE receptor FcεRI. A cross-linking antigen then triggers degranulation and the release of inflammatory mediators from the cells. Therapeutic monoclonal anti-IgE antibodies such as omalizumab, disrupt this process and are used to manage IgE-related conditions such as severe allergic asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Interestingly, naturally occurring anti-IgE autoantibodies circulate at surprisingly high levels in healthy humans and mice and may thus be instrumental in regulating IgE activity. Although many open questions remain, recent studies have shed new light on their role as IgE regulators and their mechanism of action. Here, we summarize the latest insights on natural anti-IgE autoantibodies, and we compare their functional features to therapeutic monoclonal anti-IgE autoantibodies.

Biologic Therapy in Pediatric Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Provide clinicians with current evidence for biologic therapy in children with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and clinical trial registries.

REVIEW METHODS

Key search terms related to biologic therapy in pediatric CRSwNP were identified via a structured query of current medical literature and clinical trial databases.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a dearth of active clinical trials and research studies for biologics targeting pediatric CRSwNP. There is an ongoing compassionate-use clinical trial involving Dupilumab for children with nasal polyps as well as only 1 published work specifically focused on Dupilumab for pediatric CRSwNP in the setting of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

For children with atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic idiopathic urticaria, biologic therapies such as Omalizumab, Dupilumab, and Mepolizumab have gained Food and Drug Administration approval. The role of biologic therapy in pediatric CRSwNP demonstrates significant promise in the comprehensive management of the unified airway. Additional Phase III trials are necessary to broaden clinical indications for children with comorbid conditions and complex sinonasal disease.

Ciliary Functional Analysis in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps after Multimodal Intervention: Oral Corticosteroid, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, and Omalizumab Injection

In her late 50 s, a woman with a medical history of endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) experienced a relapse of nasal polyps, significantly impacting her breathing and sense of smell. She underwent a multifaceted treatment approach, including oral corticosteroids, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, and omalizumab injections. Digital high-speed videomicroscopy (DHSV) revealed only partial improvement in ciliary beat pattern and ciliary beat frequency with oral corticosteroid treatment, while significant improvement in these ciliary parameters was observed with omalizumab injections. Furthermore, administration of omalizumab resulted in a decrease in her SNOT-22 (Sinonasal Outcome Test 22) score. Notably, this case report represents the first study investigating ciliary function using DHSV in a patient treated with omalizumab.

Biologic Therapies across Nasal Polyp Subtypes

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis is a common inflammatory condition, with subtypes like aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, and central compartment atopic disease sharing a common type 2 inflammatory pathway. Respiratory biologic therapies have been developed that target type 2 inflammation. In this article, we discuss the use of respiratory biologic therapies for nasal polyposis in general, as well as within the various subtypes of nasal polyps. Further, we discuss future roles of novel biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in nasal polyposis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) treated with omalizumab, dupilumab, or mepolizumab: A systematic review of the current knowledge towards an attempt to compare agents' efficacy

BACKGROUND

The heterogeneity of existing studies, along with the fact that there are no published head-to-head trials, are the main reasons for the lack of guidelines regarding the selection of the proper biologic in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps. The aim of this study is to summarize the current knowledge regarding the efficacy of omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab in CRS treatment. We also attempt to proceed to an indirect comparison of the agents and try to answer the tricky question: which agent to select and why?

METHODS

An extensive search in English literature was conducted in PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database/Library. Eligibility criteria included papers with full text published in English, adult population studies, clearly described intervention protocol, and documented primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The studies included numbered 37. All agents provided significant improvement in polyp size, sinuses opacification, severity of symptoms, need for surgery and systemic corticosteroids use. Analysis of available systematic reviews, meta-analyses and indirect treatment comparison studies showed that dupilumab appeared to be the most beneficial agent, in terms of primary and secondary outcomes. However, these results are of relatively low level of evidence due to several methodological limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the present analysis showed a moderate supremacy of dupilumab, there is still no evidence-based answer to the question "which biologic agent is the most effective in CRS treatment?" Improved statistical methodology, head-to-head trials, and real-life studies could lead to more robust conclusions, establishing the real role of the specific biologic agents.

Omalizumab Treatment in Uncontrolled Asthma and CRSwNP Patients, with Previous Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, to Improve Quality of Life and Endoscopic Outcomes: a Two-Year Real-Life Study

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite molecular underlying advances, limited and divergent data on monoclonal antibodies (mAb) therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) make further analysis necessary. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of omalizumab as an adjunct to endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on the treatment of CRSwNP under real-life conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the introduction of omalizumab, as the first biologic agent for the treatment of diseases such as severe allergic asthma, different studies have demonstrated an effect of omalizumab on CRSwNP, with significant improvements in sinonasal symptoms and endoscopic scores. The high efficacy derived from mAb therapy and the need for ESS prior to mAb recommended by guidelines, has led to compare both therapeutic alternatives, finding discrepancies in their effect on quality of life (QoL) and complementary tests outcomes. Patients with moderate-to-severe asthma with clinical criteria for omalizumab indication, and coexistent CRSwNP disease, were selected for a non-randomized interventional retrospective study into four treatment subgroups. Measures were analyzed and compared between groups and over time at the baseline, 16 weeks and 1 and 2 years after treatment. Omalizumab treatment in patients with previous ESS exhibited an earlier and more pronounced improvement in QoL, symptoms scale and endoscopic findings (nasal polyp score and the bilateral modified Lund-Kennedy) as early from week 16, which improvement persisted for 2 years. A greater mean improvement of 33.4 ± 6.5 (95% CI: 20.3-46.4; p < 0.001) points in sinonasal outcome test 22 (SNOT-22) was associated with ESS at week 16, against omalizumab effect (17.8 ± 7.6 [95% CI: 2.6-33.0]; p = 0.023). At year 2, an improvement in SNOT-22 of 62.6 ± 8.9 (95% CI: 48.4-84.1; p < 0.001) points was exclusively associated with omalizumab. Clinical evidence of the effect of omalizumab added to ESS treatment is provided in this study in the short- and long-term.

New insights into the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets of asthma and comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyposis

Asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) are chronic respiratory diseases. These two disorders often co-exist based on common anatomical, immunological, histopathological, and pathophysiological basis. Usually, asthma with comorbid CRSwNP is driven by type 2 (T2) inflammation which predisposes to more severe, often intractable, disease. In the past two decades, innovative technologies and detection techniques in combination with newly introduced targeted therapies helped shape our understanding of the immunological pathways underlying inflammatory airway diseases and to further identify several distinct clinical and inflammatory subsets to enhance the development of more effective personalized treatments. Presently, a number of targeted biologics has shown clinical efficacy in patients with refractory T2 airway inflammation, including anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab, reslizumab)/anti-IL5R (benralizumab), anti-IL-4R-α (anti-IL-4/IL-13, dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab). In non-type-2 endotypes, no targeted biologics have consistently shown clinical efficacy so far. Presently, multiple therapeutical targets are being explored including cytokines, membrane molecules and intracellular signalling pathways to further expand current treatment options for severe asthma with and without comorbid CRSwNP. In this review, we discuss existing biologics, those under development and share some views on new horizons.

Considerations for shared decision-making in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Shared decision-making is an approach where physicians and patients work together to determine a personalized treatment course. Such an approach is integral to patient-centered care in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). CRSwNP is a chronic inflammatory condition of the sinonasal cavity that can severely impact physical health, smell, and quality of life (QOL). Traditional standard-of-care treatment options include topical (i.e. sprays) and oral corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery, but more recently, novel corticosteroid delivery methods (i.e. high volume irrigations, recently-approved exhalation breath-powered delivering devices, and drug-eluting steroid implants) and 3 new FDA approved biologics directed against type II immunomodulators have become available. The availability of these therapeutics offers exciting new opportunities in CRSwNP management but requires personalized and shared-decision making as each modality has variable impacts on CRSwNP and related comorbid conditions. Studies have published treatment algorithms, but the practical use of these lean guidelines is heavily influenced by the lens of the treating physician, the most common being otolaryngologists and allergy immunologists. Clinical equipoise occurs when there is no basis for one intervention to be regarded as “better” than another. While most guidelines, in general, support the use of topical corticosteroids with or without oral corticosteroids followed by ESS for the majority of unoperated CRSwNP patients, there are situations of clinical equipoise that arise particularly in CRSwNP who have failed surgery or those with severe comorbid conditions. In the shared decision-making process, clinicians and patients must consider symptomatology, goals, comfort, compliance, treatment efficacy, and treatment cost when determining the initial choice of therapy and escalation of therapy with the potential use of multiple modalities for recalcitrant CRSwNP. A summary of salient considerations that might constitute shared decision-making is presented in this summary.

Advances in Sinus Surgery for Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is comprised of a diverse group of endotypes that cause significant morbidity for afflicted patients. While endoscopic sinus surgery helps ameliorate the disease, polyps frequently recur. Newer strategies are intended to provide access for topical steroid irrigations in attempts to improve the disease process and quality of life, and decrease overall recurrence of polyps.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature examining the latest surgical approaches for CRSwNP.

METHODS

Review article.

RESULTS

In dealing with the recalcitrant nature of CRSwNP, surgical techniques have simultaneously become more nuanced and aggressive. Bony resection in anatomically unfavorable areas such as the frontal, maxillary, and sphenoid outflow regions, replacing diseased or denuded mucosa with healthy grafts or flaps at the neo-ostia, and introducing drug-eluting biomaterials to newly opened sinus outflow tracts are highlights in the recent advancements in sinus surgery for CRSwNP. The Draf 3 or modified endoscopic Lothrop procedure has become a standard technique and demonstrated to improve quality of life and decrease polyp recurrence. A number of mucosal grafting or mucosal flap techniques have been described that cover exposed bone of the neo-ostium and evidence shows that this improves healing and diameter of the Draf 3. Partial middle turbinectomy, while controversial, appears to help decrease polyp recurrence in long-term follow-up studies. Modified endoscopic medial maxillectomy improves access to the maxillary sinus mucosa, facilitates debridement and, particularly, in the cystic fibrosis nasal polyp patient, improves overall management of the disease. Sphenoid drill-out procedure provides wider access for topical steroid irrigations and also may improve management of CRSwNP.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention remains a mainstay of therapy for CRSwNP. Newer techniques revolve around improving access for topical steroid therapy.

Omalizumab and cancer risk: Current evidence in allergic asthma, chronic urticaria, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Omalizumab is a biological drug targeting circulating IgE, approved for use in allergic asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, and recently for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, with good efficacy in all these settings. Some concerns about omalizumab safety have been raised as its use has been recently linked to potential increased cancer risk. Nevertheless, literature evidence does not support this statement, and clinical studies and evidence from real-world registries and surveillance analysis have consistently reported drug safety.

Biological Therapy of Severe Asthma and Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common disease worldwide and can be categorized into chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is common in patients with asthma and, particularly, severe asthma. Severe asthma is effectively treated with biologics and the coexistence of severe asthma with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps presents a phenotype that is more likely to respond to such treatment. In this review, we focus on the link between asthma and nasal polyps, and we review the treatment effect of various monoclonal antibodies in patients with severe asthma and nasal polyps as well as in patients with nasal polyps without asthma or with mild-to-moderate asthma. With the enhancement of our armamentarium with new monoclonal antibodies the right choice of biologic becomes an important target and one that is difficult to achieve due to the lack of comparative head-to-head studies.