Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial

Signaling Pathways (TNF-α-NF-κB, TLR2-TLR4 as well as ROS-MDA) and Cardiac Damages during Cardiac Surgeries (Coronary Stenting, Permanent Pacemaker Implantations, Radiofrequency Ablations)

INTRODUCTION

The mutual activations of multiple signaling pathways are the key factors in the development and progression of myocardial cell injuries.

OBJECTIVES

This research aimed to compare the different degrees of myocardial injury after coronary stenting, permanent pacemaker implantations, or cardiac radiofrequency ablation and to investigate the effects of the mutual activation of TNF-α/NF-κB, TLR2/TLR4, and ROS/MDA signaling pathways on myocardial injury in elderly patients after coronary stents or permanent pacemakers or radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS

We determined reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), tumor necrosis factor- α (TNF-α) and high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) as markers of myocardial injury in patients.

RESULTS

The levels of ROS, MDA, TLR2, TLR4, NF-κB, TNF-α, and hs-cTnT were increased in patients with permanent pacemaker implantations when compared to patients with cardiac radiofrequency ablation (P < 0.01) at 6 months and were further increased in patients with coronary stenting compared to patients with cardiac radiofrequency ablation and permanent pacemaker implantations at 6 months, respectively (P < 0.01). This research confirmed that ROS, MDA, TLR2, TLR4, NF-κB, and TNF-α predicted myocardial injury severity.

CONCLUSION

Oxidative stress (ROS/MDA signaling pathway) may be linked to immune response (TLR2/TLR4 signaling pathway) and pro-inflammatory response (TNF-α/NF-κB signaling pathway) in myocardial injury, and ROS/MDA signaling may play a dominant role.

Myocardial protection: comparing histological effects of single-dose cardioplegic solutions-study protocol for a secondary analysis of the CARDIOPLEGIA trial

Background

Myocardial protection is crucial for successful cardiac surgery, as it prevents heart muscle damage that can occur during the procedure. Prolonged hypoxia without proper protection can lead to adenosine triphosphate consumption, microvilli loss, blister formation, and edema. Custodiol, del Nido, and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with proven safety and significance in modern surgery. While each has been independently assessed for patient outcomes, limited research directly compares them. This study aims to compare their myocardial protection using histological analysis.

Methods

In a double-blind clinical trial, at least 90 patients will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three cardioplegic solutions. Myocardial biopsies will be collected before cardiopulmonary bypass and 15 minutes after reperfusion. The surgical, anesthetic and perfusion techniques will be the same for all patients, following the Institution's standard protocols.

Discussion

The ideal cardioplegic solution does not exist, and its selection remains challenging for surgeons. In modern surgical practice, understanding the behavior of these solutions and the ischemic tissue damage caused during induced cardiac arrest allows for safer surgical procedures. The results of this clinical trial can help in understanding the behavior of cardioplegic solutions and their tissue effects. Thus, by selecting the best cardioplegic solution, ischemic damage can be minimized, enhancing the effectiveness of this essential technique in cardiac procedures. The study may aid in implementing clinical protocols in several institutions, aiming to choose the solution with a superior myocardial protection profile, increasing safety, and reducing expenses.

Trial Registration

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC, http://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/): RBR-997tqhh. Registered: January 26th, 2022.