Inhaled amikacin versus placebo to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia: the AMIKINHAL double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol

In vitro killing of drug susceptible and multidrug resistant bacteria by amikacin considering pulmonary drug concentrations based on an inhaled formulation

Nosocomial infections with drug resistant bacteria impact morbidity and mortality, length of therapy and stay and the overall cost of treatment. Key pathogens with ventilator associated pneumonia may be drug-susceptible or multi-drug resistant and inhaled amikacin has been investigated as an adjunctive therapy option. High pulmonary drug concentrations (epithelial lining fluid [ELF]) along with minimal systemic toxicity is seen as an advantage to inhaled formulations. In vitro killing of bacteria using clinically relevant drug concentrations provide insight on bug-drug interactions. The aim of this study was to measure killing of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus using the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), mutant prevention concentration (MPC) and median (976 µg/ml) ELF drug concentration for amikacin. Overall killing took longer at the MIC drug concentration and was inconsistent amongst the pathogens tested with the percentage of bacteria killed following 180 min of drug exposure ranging from growth in the presence of the drug to 95% kill. At the MPC drug concentrations, killing ranged from 55-88% for all pathogens following 30 min of drug exposure and increased to 99-100% following 180 min of drug exposure. At the ELF amikacin tested, killing was 81-100% following 20 min and 94-100% by 30 min of drug exposure. Rapid killing against MDR respiratory pathogens by amikacin ELF drug concentrations is encouraging.

Inhaled Amikacin to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Whether preventive inhaled antibiotics may reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia is unclear.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, superiority trial, we assigned critically ill adults who had been undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hours to receive inhaled amikacin at a dose of 20 mg per kilogram of ideal body weight once daily or to receive placebo for 3 days. The primary outcome was a first episode of ventilator-associated pneumonia during 28 days of follow-up. Safety was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 850 patients underwent randomization, and 847 were included in the analyses (417 assigned to the amikacin group and 430 to the placebo group). All three daily nebulizations were received by 337 patients (81%) in the amikacin group and 355 patients (83%) in the placebo group. At 28 days, ventilator-associated pneumonia had developed in 62 patients (15%) in the amikacin group and in 95 patients (22%) in the placebo group (difference in restricted mean survival time to ventilator-associated pneumonia, 1.5 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 2.5; P = 0.004). An infection-related ventilator-associated complication occurred in 74 patients (18%) in the amikacin group and in 111 patients (26%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.89). Trial-related serious adverse effects were seen in 7 patients (1.7%) in the amikacin group and in 4 patients (0.9%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation for at least 3 days, a subsequent 3-day course of inhaled amikacin reduced the burden of ventilator-associated pneumonia during 28 days of follow-up. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; AMIKINHAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03149640; EUDRA Clinical Trials number, 2016-001054-17.).

Amikacin@SiO2 core@shell nanocarriers to treat pulmonal bacterial infections

AMC@SiO₂ core@shell nanocarriers (AMC: amikacin) are realized and contain an exceptionally high drug load of 0.8 mg mg^-1 (i.e. 80% AMC of total nanocarrier mass). They are prepared via a solvent-antisolvent approach with AMC nanoparticles formed in a first step, which are then covered and stabilised by a thin silica shell in a one-pot synthesis. In total, the core@shell nanocarriers exhibit a mean diameter of 240 nm with an inner AMC core of 200 nm and an outer silica shell of 20 nm. Subsequent to synthesis, the nanocarriers can be stored in frozen dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and applied directly after warming to room temperature with particle contents of 5 mg mL^-1. Size, structure, and composition of the AMC@SiO₂ core@shell nanocarriers are evidenced by electron microscopy (SEM, TEM), spectroscopic methods (EDXS, FT-IR, UV-Vis), as well as X-ray powder diffraction and elemental analysis. As proof-of-concept, the AMC release and the activity of the novel nanocarriers are tested against two relevant, difficult-to-treat and notoriously multidrug resistant, bacterial pathogens: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb.) and Mycobacterium abscessus (M.abs.). Colloidal stability, storage stability, high drug load, and activity of the AMC@SiO₂ core@shell nanocarriers are promising for, e.g., aerosol-type pulmonal application.

Lung Microbiome in Critically Ill Patients

The historical hypothesis of sterility of the lungs was invalidated over a decade ago when studies demonstrated the existence of sparse but very diverse bacterial populations in the normal lung and the association between pulmonary dysbiosis and chronic respiratory diseases. Under mechanical ventilation, dysbiosis occurs rapidly with a gradual decline in diversity over time and the progressive predominance of a bacterial pathogen (mainly Proteobacteria) when lung infection occurs. During acute respiratory distress syndrome, an enrichment in bacteria of intestinal origin, mainly Enterobacteriaceae, is observed. However, the role of this dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome is not yet fully understood. The lack of exploration of other microbial populations, viruses (eukaryotes and prokaryotes) and fungi is a key issue. Further analysis of the interaction between these microbial kingdoms and a better understanding of the host−microbiome interaction are necessary to fully elucidate the role of the microbiome in the pathogenicity of acute diseases. The validation of a consensual and robust methodology in order to make the comparison of the different studies relevant is also required. Filling these different gaps should help develop preventive and therapeutic strategies for both acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilator-associated pneumonia.