1
|
Toomey CM, Bhardwaj A, Browne J, Dowling I, Grealis S, Hayes P, Higgins N, Maguire D, O'Hora J, Rector J, Wood-Thornsbury A, Kennedy N. Guideline-based exercise management for hip and knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional comparison of healthcare professional and patient beliefs in Ireland. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080646. [PMID: 38969380 PMCID: PMC11227783 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify within-stakeholder agreement and between-stakeholder differences in beliefs regarding exercise for osteoarthritis among general practitioners (GPs), physiotherapists (PTs) and people with hip and knee osteoarthritis (PwOA). A secondary objective was to explore the association between referral patterns and beliefs of PwOA. DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING Online surveys administered to GPs, PTs and PwOA in Ireland via social media and healthcare networks. PARTICIPANTS 421 valid responses (n=161 GPs, n=163 PTs, n=97 PwOA). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Nine belief statements related to exercise effectiveness, safety and delivery were rated on a 5-point Likert scale and analysed for within-stakeholder consensus. χ2 tests assessed differences in agreement between groups. Multivariable linear regression models tested associations between beliefs in PwOA and referral to/attendance at physiotherapy. RESULTS Positive within-stakeholder consensus (>75% agreement) was reached for most statements (7/9 GPs, 6/9 PTs, 5/9 PwOA). However, beliefs of PwOA were significantly less positive compared with healthcare professionals for six statements. All stakeholders disagreed that exercise is effective regardless of the level of pain. Attendance at physiotherapy (49% of PwOA), rather than referral to physiotherapy from a GP only, was associated with positive exercise beliefs for PwOA (β=0.287 (95% CI 0.299 to 1.821)). CONCLUSIONS Beliefs about exercise therapy for osteoarthritis are predominantly positive across all stakeholders, although less positive in PwOA. PwOA are more likely to have positive beliefs if they have seen a PT for their osteoarthritis. Knowledge translation should highlight the effectiveness of exercise for all levels of pain and osteoarthritis disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clodagh M Toomey
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Participatory Health Research Unit, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Avantika Bhardwaj
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Jacqui Browne
- Patient Author, IMPACT Steering Committee, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Ian Dowling
- Ian Dowling Physiotherapy Clinic, Limerick, Ireland
- Clinician Author, IMPACT Steering Committee, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Stacey Grealis
- Patient Author, IMPACT Steering Committee, Limerick, Ireland
- Centre of Arthritis Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Hayes
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Clinician Author, IMPACT Steering Committee, Limerick, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Niall Higgins
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Darragh Maguire
- Clinician Author, IMPACT Steering Committee, Limerick, Ireland
- Department of Physiotherapy, National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John O'Hora
- Clinician Author, IMPACT Steering Committee, Limerick, Ireland
- Community Healthcare West, Health Service Executive, Co. Roscommon, Ireland
| | - Joseph Rector
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | | | - Norelee Kennedy
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Killingmo RM, Øiestad BE, Risberg MA, Maas E, Grotle M. Cost-effectiveness of strength exercise or aerobic exercise compared with usual care for patients with knee osteoarthritis: secondary results from a multiarm randomised controlled trial in Norway. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e079704. [PMID: 38803266 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the 1-year cost-effectiveness of strength exercise or aerobic exercise compared with usual care for patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA), from a societal and healthcare perspective. DESIGN Cost-effectiveness analysis embedded in a three-arm randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING A total of 161 people with symptomatic knee OA seeking Norwegian primary or secondary care were included in the analyses. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomised to either 12 weeks of strength exercise (n=54), 12 weeks of aerobic exercise (n=53) or usual care (n=54). OUTCOME MEASURES Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) estimated by the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels, and costs related to healthcare utilisation and productivity loss estimated in euros (€), aggregated for 1 year of follow-up. Cost-effectiveness was expressed with mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Bootstrapping was used to estimate ICER uncertainty. RESULTS From a 1-year societal perspective, the mean cost per patient was €7954, €8101 and €17 398 in the strength exercise, aerobic exercise and usual care group, respectively. From a 1-year healthcare perspective, the mean cost per patient was €848, €2003 and €1654 in the strength exercise, aerobic exercise and usual care group, respectively. Mean differences in costs significantly favoured strength exercise and aerobic exercise from a 1-year societal perspective and strength exercise from a 1-year healthcare perspective. There were no significant differences in mean QALYs between groups. From a 1-year societal perspective, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €27 500, the probability of strength exercise or aerobic exercise being cost-effective was ≥98%. From a 1-year healthcare perspective, the probability of strength exercise or aerobic exercise being cost-effective was ≥97% and ≥76%, respectively. CONCLUSION From a 1-year societal and healthcare perspective, a 12-week strength exercise or aerobic exercise programme is cost-effective compared with usual care in patients with symptomatic knee OA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01682980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Munk Killingmo
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway
| | - Britt Elin Øiestad
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - May-Arna Risberg
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Esther Maas
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreth Grotle
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo universitetssykehus Ulleval, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baumbach L, Feddern W, Kretzler B, Hajek A, König HH. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Musculoskeletal Conditions Offered by Physiotherapists: A Systematic Review of Trial-Based Evaluations. SPORTS MEDICINE - OPEN 2024; 10:38. [PMID: 38613739 PMCID: PMC11016054 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00713-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions are a leading contributor to disability worldwide. The treatment of these conditions accounts for 7% of health care costs in Germany and is often provided by physiotherapists. Yet, an overview of the cost-effectiveness of treatments for musculoskeletal conditions offered by physiotherapists is missing. This review aims to provide an overview of full economic evaluations of interventions for musculoskeletal conditions offered by physiotherapists. METHODS We systematically searched for publications in Medline, EconLit, and NHS-EED. Title and abstracts, followed by full texts were screened independently by two authors. We included trial-based full economic evaluations of physiotherapeutic interventions for patients with musculoskeletal conditions and allowed any control group. We extracted participants' information, the setting, the intervention, and details on the economic analyses. We evaluated the quality of the included articles with the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria checklist. RESULTS We identified 5141 eligible publications and included 83 articles. The articles were based on 78 clinical trials. They addressed conditions of the spine (n = 39), the upper limb (n = 8), the lower limb (n = 30), and some other conditions (n = 6). The most investigated conditions were low back pain (n = 25) and knee and hip osteoarthritis (n = 16). The articles involved 69 comparisons between physiotherapeutic interventions (in which we defined primary interventions) and 81 comparisons in which only one intervention was offered by a physiotherapist. Physiotherapeutic interventions compared to those provided by other health professionals were cheaper and more effective in 43% (18/42) of the comparisons. Ten percent (4/42) of the interventions were dominated. The overall quality of the articles was high. However, the description of delivered interventions varied widely and often lacked details. This limited fair treatment comparisons. CONCLUSIONS High-quality evidence was found for physiotherapeutic interventions to be cost-effective, but the result depends on the patient group, intervention, and control arm. Treatments of knee and back conditions were primarily investigated, highlighting a need for physiotherapeutic cost-effectiveness analyses of less often investigated joints and conditions. The documentation of provided interventions needs improvement to enable clinicians and stakeholders to fairly compare interventions and ultimately adopt cost-effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Baumbach
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Wiebke Feddern
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kretzler
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - André Hajek
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang J. The causal effect of two occupational factors on osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Public Health 2024; 11:1281214. [PMID: 38410128 PMCID: PMC10895025 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are two common types of arthritis. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to estimate the causal effects of two common occupational factors-job involves heavy manual or physical work and job involves mainly walking or standing-on OA and RA in individuals of European ancestry. Methods Instruments were chosen from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) that identified independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) robustly linked to job involves heavy manual or physical work (N = 263,615) as well as job involves mainly walking or standing (N = 263,556). Summary statistics for OA and RA were taken from the Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) GWAS database; both discovery and replication GWAS datasets were considered. The primary analysis utilized the inverse variance weighted (IVW) MR method supplemented by various sensitivity MR analyses. Results In the IVW model, we found that genetically predicted job involves heavy manual or physical work was significantly associated with OA in both the discovery [odds ratio (OR) = 1.034, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.016-1.053, P = 2.257 × 10-4] and replication (OR = 1.857, 95% CI: 1.223-2.822, P = 0.004) analyses. The causal associations were supported in diverse sensitivity analyses. MR analyses suggested no causal effect of genetically predicted job involves heavy manual or physical work on RA. Similarly, our data provided no evidence that genetically predicted job involves mainly walking or standing was related to OA and RA. Conclusions Our MR study suggests that job involves heavy manual or physical work is a risk factor for OA. It is of utmost importance to create preventive strategies aimed at reducing its impact on OA at such work sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Huang
- Clinical Laboratory Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sørensen B, Aagaard P, Hjortshøj MH, Hansen SK, Suetta C, Couppé C, Magnusson SP, Johannsen FE. Physiological and clinical effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted resistance exercise compared to standard rehabilitation in adults with knee osteoarthritis-Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295666. [PMID: 38096198 PMCID: PMC10721028 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common disease with high socioeconomical costs. In Denmark, standard rehabilitation (SR) consists of a combination of patient education and supervised physical exercise involving a standardized neuromuscular training program. As an evidence-based alternative, high-load (>70% 1RM) resistance training (HIRT) has shown positive rehabilitation effects in knee-OA but may not be tolerated in all patients (~25%) due to knee joint pain. However, low-load resistance training (20-40% 1RM) with concurrent partial blood-flow restriction (BFR) appears to produce effects similar to HIRT yet involving reduced joint pain during and after exercise. The aim is to examine the effect of low-load BFR training compared to SR on pain, thigh muscle mass and muscle function in adults with knee-OA. We hypothesize that 12 weeks of BFR will lead to superior improvements in pain, muscle mass and mechanical muscle function compared to SR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 90 participants diagnosed with radiographic knee-OA will be randomized to either BFR or SR twice a week for 12 weeks. BFR will consist of two selected lower limb strength exercises performed with an inflated pneumatic occlusion cuff. Intervention procedures in SR consist of a full 8 weeks GLA:D course followed by 4 weeks of team group training. Primary outcome variable is the change in KOOS-Pain subscale from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcome variables are changes in pain sensitivity, functional performance, muscle mass and mechanical muscle function. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses will be conducted. One-way analysis of variance will be performed to evaluate between-group changes. Pre-to-post intervention comparisons will be analyzed using a mixed linear model. Regression analysis will be performed to evaluate potential associations between selected outcome variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Sørensen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Per Aagaard
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Mikkel H. Hjortshøj
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Centre for Health and Rehabilitation, University College Absalon, Slagelse, Denmark
| | - Sofie K. Hansen
- Department of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Suetta
- Department of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Faculty of Health, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Couppé
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - S. Peter Magnusson
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
- Department of Physical & Occupational Therapy, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| | - Finn E. Johannsen
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen (ISMC), Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen NV, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jones CA, Jessiman-Perreault G, Kania-Richmond A(A, Metcalfe A, Hart DA, Beaupre LA. The effect of geographic location and payor type on provincial-wide delivery of the GLA:D program for hip and knee osteoarthritis in Alberta, Canada. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2023; 5:100398. [PMID: 37649533 PMCID: PMC10463251 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The Good Life with osteoArthritis: Denmark (GLA:D™) program for knee and hip osteoarthritis has been shown to be effective, but evaluations have yet to explore whether effectiveness differs by program context. The present study explores whether there are differences in effectiveness of the GLA:D™ program for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis across program location (i.e., rural, urban, metro) and program payor (i.e., public, private) within Alberta, Canada. Design The study population was adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis attending the 8-week GLA:D™ supervised exercise and education programme in Alberta between Sep 2017-Mar 2020. Outcomes of interest were joint-related pain and quality of life (HOOS/KOOS), health quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and performance-based functional (30-s chair stand test; 40-m walk test) measures. Minimally clinically important changes were calculated for each outcome and ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to determine statistical significance by program location or payor. Results Of the 1321 eligible participants, 974 (73.7%) completed the baseline questionnaire, about 50% of participants participated in a metro area and 60% paid privately for the program. There were no statistically significant differences in improvements of joint-related pain, joint-related quality of life, health-related quality of life, or performance-based functional measures by program location or program payor, except for participants who received the program in a publicly covered primary care clinic who experienced significantly larger improvements in joint-related pain. Conclusion The implementation of the GLA:D™ program for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis in Alberta is effective across a range of contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Allyson Jones
- Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Ania (Anna) Kania-Richmond
- Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amy Metcalfe
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - David A. Hart
- Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lauren A. Beaupre
- Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - the Bone and Joint Health SCN
- Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Young JJ, Perruccio AV, Veillette CJH, McGlasson RA, Zywiel MG. The GLA:D® Canada program for knee and hip osteoarthritis: A comprehensive profile of program participants from 2017 to 2022. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289645. [PMID: 37535587 PMCID: PMC10399832 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) program was implemented in Canada in 2017 with the aim of making treatment guideline-recommended care available to the 4 million Canadians with knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA). This report describes the GLA:D® Canada program, registry and data collection procedures, and summarizes the sociodemographic and clinical profile of participants with knee and hip OA to inform the scientific research community of the availability of these data for future investigations and collaborations. METHODS The GLA:D® program consists of three standardized components: a training course for health care providers, a group-based patient education and exercise therapy program, and a participant data registry. Patients seeking care for knee or hip OA symptoms and enrolling in GLA:D® are given the option to provide data to the GLA:D® Canada registry. Participants agreeing to provide data complete a pre-program survey and are followed up after 3-, and 12-months. Data collected on the pre-program and follow-up surveys include sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, health status measures, and objective physical function tests. These variables were selected to capture information across relevant health constructs and for future research investigations. RESULTS At 2022 year-end, a total of 15,193 (11,228 knee; 3,965 hip) participants were included in the GLA:D® Canada registry with 7,527 (knee; 67.0%) and 2,798 (hip; 70.6%) providing pre-program data. Participants were 66 years of age on average, predominately female, and overweight or obese. Typically, participants had knee or hip problems for multiple years prior to initiating GLA:D®, multiple symptomatic knee and hip joints, and at least one medical comorbidity. Before starting the program, the average pain intensity was 5 out of 10, with approximately 2 out of 3 participants using pain medication and 1 in 3 participants reporting a desire to have joint surgery. Likewise, 9 out 10 participants report having previously been given a diagnosis of OA, with 9 out 10 also reporting having had a radiograph, of which approximately 87% reported the radiograph showed signs of OA. CONCLUSION We have described the GLA:D® Canada program, registry and data collection procedures, and provided a detailed summary to date of the profiles of participants with knee and hip OA. These individual participant data have the potential to be linked with local health administrative data registries and comparatively assessed with other international GLA:D® registries. Researchers are invited to make use of these rich datasets and participate in collaborative endeavours to tackle questions of Canadian and global importance for a large and growing clinical population of individuals with hip and knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Young
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anthony V Perruccio
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian J H Veillette
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rhona A McGlasson
- Bone and Joint Canada, Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael G Zywiel
- Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cunningham J, Doyle F, Ryan JM, Clyne B, Cadogan C, Cottrell E, Murphy P, Smith SM, French HP. Primary care-based models of care for osteoarthritis; a scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023; 61:152221. [PMID: 37327762 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and describe the extent, nature, characteristics, and impact of primary care-based models of care (MoCs) for osteoarthritis (OA) that have been developed and/or evaluated. DESIGN Six electronic databases were searched from 2010 to May 2022. Relevant data were extracted and collated for narrative synthesis. RESULTS Sixty-three studies pertaining to 37 discrete MoCs from 13 countries were included, of which 23 (62%) could be classified as OA management programmes (OAMPs) comprising a self-management intervention to be delivered as a discrete package. Four models (11%) focussed on enhancing the initial consultation between a patient presenting with OA at the first point of contact into a local health system and the clinician. Emphasis was placed on educational training for general practitioners (GPs) and allied healthcare professionals delivering this initial consultation. The remaining 10 MoCs (27%) detailed integrated care pathways of onward referral to specialist secondary orthopaedic and rheumatology care within local healthcare systems. The majority (35/37; 95%) were developed in high-income countries and 32/37 (87%) targeted hip/and or knee OA. Frequently identified model components included GP-led care, referral to primary care services and multidisciplinary care. The models were predominantly 'one-size fits all' and lacked individualised care approaches. A minority of MoCs, 5/37 (14%) were developed using underlying frameworks, three (8%) of which incorporated behaviour change theories, while 13/37 (35%) incorporated provider training. Thirty-four of the 37 models (92%) were evaluated. Outcome domains most frequently reported included clinical outcomes, followed by system- and provider-level outcomes. While there was evidence of improved quality of OA care associated with the models, effects on clinical outcomes were mixed. CONCLUSION There are emerging efforts internationally to develop evidence-based models focused on non-surgical primary care OA management. Notwithstanding variations in healthcare systems and resources, future research should focus on model development alignment with implementation science frameworks and theories, key stakeholder involvement including patient and public representation, provision of training and education for providers, treatment individualisation, integration and coordination of services across the care continuum and incorporation of behaviour change strategies to foster long-term adherence and self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joice Cunningham
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Frank Doyle
- Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jennifer M Ryan
- Public Health and Epidemiology, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barbara Clyne
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Paul Murphy
- RCSI Library, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helen P French
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Englund M, Turkiewicz A. Pain in clinical trials for knee osteoarthritis: estimation of regression to the mean. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2023; 5:e309-e311. [PMID: 38251596 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00090-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Englund
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
| | - Aleksandra Turkiewicz
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weber F, Müller C, Bahns C, Kopkow C, Färber F, Gellert P, Otte I, Vollmar HC, Brannath W, Diederich F, Kloep S, Rothgang H, Dieter V, Krauß I, Kloek C, Veenhof C, Collisi S, Repschläger U, Böbinger H, Grüneberg C, Thiel C, Peschke D. Smartphone-assisted training with education for patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis (SmArt-E): study protocol for a multicentre pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:221. [PMID: 36959595 PMCID: PMC10034894 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06255-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hip and knee osteoarthritis are associated with functional limitations, pain and restrictions in quality of life and the ability to work. Furthermore, with growing prevalence, osteoarthritis is increasingly causing (in)direct costs. Guidelines recommend exercise therapy and education as primary treatment strategies. Available options for treatment based on physical activity promotion and lifestyle change are often insufficiently provided and used. In addition, the quality of current exercise programmes often does not meet the changing care needs of older people with comorbidities and exercise adherence is a challenge beyond personal physiotherapy. The main objective of this study is to investigate the short- and long-term (cost-)effectiveness of the SmArt-E programme in people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in terms of pain and physical functioning compared to usual care. Methods This study is designed as a multicentre randomized controlled trial with a target sample size of 330 patients. The intervention is based on the e-Exercise intervention from the Netherlands, consists of a training and education programme and is conducted as a blended care intervention over 12 months. We use an app to support independent training and the development of self-management skills. The primary and secondary hypotheses are that participants in the SmArt-E intervention will have less pain (numerical rating scale) and better physical functioning (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) compared to participants in the usual care group after 12 and 3 months. Other secondary outcomes are based on domains of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI). The study will be accompanied by a process evaluation. Discussion After a positive evaluation, SmArt-E can be offered in usual care, flexibly addressing different care situations. The desired sustainability and the support of the participants’ behavioural change are initiated via the app through audio-visual contact with their physiotherapists. Furthermore, the app supports the repetition and consolidation of learned training and educational content. For people with osteoarthritis, the new form of care with proven effectiveness can lead to a reduction in underuse and misuse of care as well as contribute to a reduction in (in)direct costs. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00028477. Registered on August 10, 2022. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06255-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Weber
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Health Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carsten Müller
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Health Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Carolin Bahns
- grid.8842.60000 0001 2188 0404Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Christian Kopkow
- grid.8842.60000 0001 2188 0404Department of Therapy Science I, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| | - Francesca Färber
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Gellert
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ina Otte
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Horst Christian Vollmar
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Werner Brannath
- grid.7704.40000 0001 2297 4381Competence Center for Clinical Trials Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Freya Diederich
- grid.7704.40000 0001 2297 4381Department for Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Stephan Kloep
- grid.7704.40000 0001 2297 4381Competence Center for Clinical Trials Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heinz Rothgang
- grid.7704.40000 0001 2297 4381Department for Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Valerie Dieter
- grid.411544.10000 0001 0196 8249Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Medical Clinic, Interfaculty Research Institute for Sports and Physical Activity, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Inga Krauß
- grid.411544.10000 0001 0196 8249Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Medical Clinic, Interfaculty Research Institute for Sports and Physical Activity, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Corelien Kloek
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy Veenhof
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- grid.5477.10000000120346234Research Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Collisi
- grid.491717.dReferat Projektmanagement und Digitalisierung, Bundesverband selbstständiger Physiotherapeuten – IFK e. V., Bochum, Germany
| | - Ute Repschläger
- grid.491717.dReferat Projektmanagement und Digitalisierung, Bundesverband selbstständiger Physiotherapeuten – IFK e. V., Bochum, Germany
| | - Hannes Böbinger
- grid.492243.a0000 0004 0483 0044Innovationsfonds & Produktportfolio, Techniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Grüneberg
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Health Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Christian Thiel
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Health Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| | - Dirk Peschke
- Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Applied Health Sciences, Hochschule für Gesundheit (University of Applied Health Sciences), Gesundheitscampus 6-8, 44801 Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holden MA, Nicolson PJA, Thomas MJ, Corp N, Hinman RS, Bennell KL. Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: rehabilitation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31:177-186. [PMID: 36244626 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
This year in review presents key highlights from research relating to osteoarthritis (OA) rehabilitation published from the 1st April 2021 to the 18th March 2022. To identify studies for inclusion in the review, an electronic database search was carried out in Medline, Embase and CINAHLplus. Following screening, included studies were grouped according to their predominant topic area, including core OA rehabilitation treatments (education, exercise, weight loss), adjunctive treatments, novel and emerging treatments or research methods, and translation of rehabilitation evidence into practice. Studies of perceived high clinical importance, quality, or controversy in the field were selected for inclusion in the review. Headline findings include: the positive role of technology to support remote delivery of core OA rehabilitation treatments, the importance of delivering educational interventions alongside exercise, the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a stepped approach to exercise, controversy around the potential mechanisms of action of exercise, mixed findings regarding the use of splinting for thumb base OA, increasing research on blood flow restriction training as a potential new intervention for OA, and evidence that the beneficial effects from core OA treatments seen in randomised controlled trials can be seen when implemented in clinical practice. A consistent finding across several recently published systematic reviews is that randomised controlled trials testing OA rehabilitation interventions are often small, with some risk of bias. Whilst future research is warranted, it needs to be large scale and robust, to enable definitive answers to important remaining questions in the field of OA rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Holden
- School of Medicine, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
| | - P J A Nicolson
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, UK
| | - M J Thomas
- School of Medicine, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK; Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Staffordshire, UK
| | - N Corp
- School of Medicine, David Weatherall Building, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - R S Hinman
- Centre for Health, Exercise & Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - K L Bennell
- Centre for Health, Exercise & Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Toomey CM, Kennedy N, MacFarlane A, Glynn L, Forbes J, Skou ST, Roos EM. Implementation of clinical guidelines for osteoarthritis together (IMPACT): protocol for a participatory health research approach to implementing high value care. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:643. [PMID: 35790924 PMCID: PMC9254615 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05599-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The evidence-based interventions of exercise and education have been strongly recommended as part of prominent clinical guidelines for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) for more than ten years. Despite the wealth of strong evidence that exists, implementation in practice is sub-optimal. This paper describes the key methodologies used in the co-design, tailoring, and evaluation of the IMPACT project implementation strategies, to confront this problem across multiple levels (micro, meso, macro) in public and private healthcare settings in Ireland.
Methods
Using a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness design, a participatory, dynamic and iterative process will be used to tailor and evaluate multi-level implementation strategies using the following stages: 1) Co-design the implementation strategies with key stakeholders using best evidence, a theory-driven implementation framework (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research), local context and expert consensus; 2) Pilot and evaluate the implementation strategies by training physiotherapists to deliver the evidence-based Good Life with osteoArthritis Denmark (GLA:D®) education and exercise programme using the implementation strategies, and conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation; 3) Adapt the implementation strategies based on implementation process evaluation indicators from stage two. The adapted strategies will be used for scale-up and sustainability in subsequent GLA:D® Ireland training programmes that will be rolled out nationally. Evaluation of effectiveness on patient and cost outcomes will continue up to 12 months post-programme delivery, using an online patient registry and pre-post design.
Discussion
This implementation science project aims to use participatory health research to address a gap in management of OA across public and private healthcare settings. This research has the potential to change practice and promote a policy of exercise and physical activity referral for chronic musculoskeletal disease that utilises community engagement effectively and enacts change ‘together’, with involvement of researchers, decision-makers, clinicians and patients.
Collapse
|