Use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: an explorative study based on EU healthcare professionals

Mixed Reality as a Digital Visualisation Solution for the Head and Neck Tumour Board: Application Creation and Implementation Study

The preparation and implementation of interdisciplinary oncological case reviews are time-consuming and complex. The variety of clinical and radiological information must be presented in a clear and comprehensible manner. Only if all relevant patient-specific information is demonstrated in a short time frame can well-founded treatment decisions be made on this basis. Mixed reality (MR) technology as a multimodal interactive user interface could enhance understanding in multidisciplinary collaboration by visualising radiological or clinical data. The aim of the work was to develop an MR-based software prototype for a head and neck tumour board (HNTB) to support clinical decision-making. The article describes the development phases and workflows in the planning and creation of a MR-based software prototype that were required to meet the multidisciplinary characteristics of a HNTB.

What are the barriers to medical collaboration in community-based integrated care supporting cancer patients? A qualitative analysis of healthcare and long-term care providers' perceptions

BACKGROUND

Patients required comprehensive cancer treatment in the community based on medical collaboration between designated cancer care hospitals and community medical and nursing care facilities to help them live life on their own terms. This study aims to describe the barriers to medical collaboration in community-based integrated care from the perspectives of healthcare providers (HCPs) and long-term care providers (LCPs) supporting cancer patients.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 88 HCPs and LCPs supporting cancer patients. We analyzed interview data to describe barriers to medical collaboration between designated cancer care hospitals and community medical and nursing care facilities using content analysis in MAXQDA.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly HCPs, with physicians accounting for the largest proportion (27.3%). Totally, 299 codes were integrated into seven barriers to medical collaboration in community-based integrated care, including lack of information provision including life perspectives and a delay in sharing cancer patients' values with HCPs to provide end-of-life care according to the patients' wishes. Furthermore, insufficient coordination of cancer and non-cancer symptom management was identified as a barrier specific to older adults with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers related to cancer treatment that integrate lifestyle perspectives, end-of-life care emphasizing patient values, and medical collaboration between cancer and non-cancer care are distinctive. They emphasize the importance of utilizing professionals to connect treatment and lifestyle information, establishing a central coordinating organization led by the DCCH, and developing a community palliative care network. Moreover, connecting cancer and non-cancer care through government and medical collaboration is crucial.

Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly integrated into healthcare settings to improve patient outcomes, reduce medical errors and enhance clinical efficiency by providing clinicians with evidence-based recommendations at the point of care. However, the adoption and optimisation of these systems remain a challenge. This review aims to provide an overview of the current state of CDSS, discussing their development, implementation, benefits, limitations and future directions. We also explore the potential for enhancing their effectiveness and provide an outlook for future developments in this field. There are several challenges in CDSS implementation, including data privacy concerns, system integration and clinician acceptance. While CDSS have demonstrated significant potential, their adoption and optimisation remain a challenge.

Facilitators and barriers to conducting an efficient, competent and high-quality oncological multidisciplinary team meeting

BACKGROUND

Optimal oncological care nowadays requires discussing every patient in a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM). The number of patients to be discussed is rising rapidly due to the increasing incidence and prevalence of cancer and the emergence of new multidisciplinary treatment options. This puts MDTMs under considerable time pressure. The aim of this study is therefore to identify the facilitators and barriers with regard to performing an efficient, competent and high-quality MDTM.

METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted with Dutch medical specialists and residents participating in oncological MDTMs. Purposive sampling was used to maximise variation in participants' professional and demographic characteristics (eg, sex, medical specialist vs resident, specialty, type and location of affiliated hospital). Interview data were systematically analysed according to the principles of thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen medical specialists and 19 residents were interviewed. All interviewees agreed that attending and preparing MDTMs is time-consuming and indicated the need for optimal execution in order to ensure that MDTMs remain feasible in the near future. Four themes emerged that are relevant to achieving an optimal MDTM: (1) organisational aspects; (2) participants' responsibilities and requirements; (3) competences, behaviour and team dynamics and (4) meeting content. Good organisation, a sound structure and functioning information and communication technology facilitate high-quality MDTMs. Multidisciplinary collaboration and adequate communication are essential competences for participants; a lack thereof and the existence of a hierarchy are hindering factors.

CONCLUSION

Conducting an efficient, competent and high-quality oncological MDTM is facilitated and hindered by many factors. Being aware of these factors provides opportunities for optimising MDTMs, which are under pressure due to the increase in the number of patients to discuss.