Physical therapy and orthopaedic equipment-induced reduction in the biomechanical risk factors related to knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Knee braces for knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of interventions in randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological.

CONCLUSIONS

Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.

Improving muscle capacity utilization with a 12-week strengthening program for females with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Strengthening exercise improves symptoms in knee osteoarthritis (OA), but it remains unclear if biomechanical mechanisms contribute to this improvement. Muscle capacity utilization, which reflects the proportion of maximum capacity required to complete tasks, may provide insight into how strengthening exercise improves clinical outcomes in painful knee OA.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine if a 12-week strengthening intervention reduced muscle capacity utilization during walking, squat and lunge tasks in females with painful knee OA.

METHODS

Data from 28 females (age 59.6 ± 6.2 years old; body mass index 29.1 ± 4.7 kg/m2) with clinical knee OA were included. Participants completed a strengthening intervention 3 times per week for 12 weeks. Knee extensor isometric torque was measured on a commercial dynamometer; peak values from three exertions were averaged. Peak KFM was extracted and averaged from five walking trials. Mean KFM was extracted and averaged from three trials for each of static lunges and squats. Muscle capacity utilization was the ratio of mean peak KFM to peak extensor torque for walking; and mean KFM to peak extensor torque for squats and lunges. Paired t-tests determined differences between peak extensor torque, peak KFM and muscle capacity utilization from pre to post intervention (p < 0.05).

RESULTS & SIGNIFICANCE

Peak extensor torque increased at follow up (p = 0.02). Peak KFM during walking decreased (p = 0.005). Muscle capacity utilization during walking (p = 0.008) and squat (p = 0.002) decreased. Mean KFM and muscle capacity utilization during lunge remained unchanged from pre to post intervention. The reduction in muscle capacity utilization at follow up indicates the strengthening intervention produced a decrease in proportion of the maximal capacity a participant used to complete walking and squat tasks. Strengthening both increases maximal muscle capacity and decreases the net moment required during daily tasks in knee OA.

Persistent altered knee loading in patients with meniscectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the changes in knee flexion moment (KFM) and knee adduction moment (KAM) during weight-bearing activities following meniscectomy.

DESIGN

Meta-Analysis.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

332 meniscectomy patients and 137 healthy controls (from 13 qualified studies) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cohen's d effect sizes (ESs) were calculated to compare KAM and KFM values of the surgical legs to the non-surgical and to healthy control legs.

RESULTS

When compared to healthy controls, meniscectomy patients' surgical legs demonstrated a significantly greater KAM (ES = 0.310; P = 0.002) but no significant difference in KFM (ES = -0.182; P = 0.051). When compared to the patients' non-surgical legs, however, the surgical legs showed no difference in KAM (ES = -0.024; P = 0.716) but a significantly lower KFM (ES = -0.422; P < 0.001). High heterogeneity among study ESs was observed in patients' between-limb comparison for KAM (Q-value = 20.08, P = 0.005; I2 = 65.1%) and KFM (Q-value = 43.96, P < 0.001; I2 = 79.5%). However, no significant differences in study ESs (all P > 0.102) of KFM and KAM were identified when comparing studies with various times post-surgery, weight-bearing tasks, walking speeds, or patient demographics.

CONCLUSION

Elevated KAM and reduced/asymmetrical KFM observed in meniscectomy patients may contribute to the increased risk of knee OA. Rehabilitation should focus on movement education to restore between-limb KFM symmetry and reduce KAM bilaterally post-meniscectomy.

Can exercise interventions reduce external knee adduction moment during gait? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An increased external knee adduction moment has been identified as a factor contributing to the progression of medial knee osteoarthritis. Interventions that reduce knee adduction moment may help prevent knee osteoarthritis onset and progression. While exercise interventions have been commonly used to treat knee osteoarthritis, whether exercises can modulate knee adduction moment in knee osteoarthritis patients remains unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine if exercise interventions are effective in reducing knee adduction moment during gait.

METHODS

Study reports published through May 2023 were screened for pre-specified inclusion/exclusion criteria. Nine studies met the eligibility criteria and yielded 24 effect sizes comparing the reduction in knee adduction moment of the exercise intervention groups to the control groups. Moderator/experimental variables concerning characteristics of the exercise interventions and included subjects (e.g., sex, BMI, type of exercise, muscle group targeted, training volume, physical therapist supervision) that may contribute to variation among studies were explored through subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

FINDINGS

The effect of exercise intervention on modulating knee adduction moment during gait was no better than control (ES = -0.004, P = 0.946). Sub-group analysis revealed that the effect sizes of studies containing only females (positive exercise effect) were significantly greater than studies containing both males and females.

INTERPRETATION

Exercise may not be effective in reducing knee adduction moment during gait. Clinicians aiming to decrease knee adduction moment in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis should consider alternative treatment options. Exploring the underlying mechanism(s) regarding a more positive response to exercises in females may help design more effective exercise interventions.

Fundamentals of osteoarthritis. Rehabilitation: Exercise, diet, biomechanics, and physical therapist-delivered interventions

Insights related to the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) have informed rehabilitative treatments that aim to mitigate the influence of several known impairments and risk factors for OA, with the goal to improve pain, function, and quality of life. The purpose of this invited narrative review is to provide fundamental knowledge to non-specialists about exercise and education, diet, biomechanical interventions, and other physical therapist-delivered treatments. In addition to summarizing the rationale for common rehabilitative therapies, we provide a synthesis of current core recommendations. Robust evidence based on randomized clinical trials supports exercise with education and diet as core treatments for OA. Structured, supervised exercise therapy is advised. The mode of exercise may vary but should be individualized. The dose should be based on an initial assessment, the desired physiological changes, and progressed when appropriate. Diet combined with exercise is strongly recommended and studies demonstrate a dose-response relationship between the magnitude of weight loss and symptom improvement. Recent evidence suggests the use of technology to remotely deliver exercise, diet and education interventions is cost-effective. Although several studies support the mechanisms for biomechanical interventions (e.g., bracing, shoe inserts) and physical therapist-delivered (passive) treatments (e.g., manual therapy, electrotherapeutic modalities) fewer rigorous randomized trials support their clinical use; these therapies are sometimes recommended as adjuncts to core treatments. The mechanisms of action for all rehabilitative interventions include contextual factors such as attention and placebo effects. These effects can challenge our interpretation of treatment efficacy from clinical trials, yet also provide opportunities to maximize patient outcomes in clinical practice. When evaluating rehabilitative interventions, the field may benefit from increased emphasis on research that considers contextual factors while evaluating mechanistic, longer-term, clinically-important and policy-relevant outcome measures.

Association of the Degree of Varus Thrust during Gait Assessed by an Inertial Measurement Unit with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Knee Osteoarthritis

This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of varus thrust (VT) assessed by an inertial measurement unit (IMU) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Seventy patients (mean age: 59.8 ± 8.6 years; women: n = 40) were instructed to walk on a treadmill with an IMU attached to the tibial tuberosity. For the index of VT during walking (VT-index), the swing-speed adjusted root mean square of acceleration in the mediolateral direction was calculated. As the PROMs, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were used. Data on age, sex, body mass index, static alignment, central sensitization, and gait speed were collected as potential confounders. After adjusting for potential confounders, multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the VT-index was significantly associated with the pain score (standardized β = -0.295; p = 0.026), symptoms score (standardized β = -0.287; p = 0.026), and activities of the daily living score (standardized β = -0.256; p = 0.028). Our results indicated that larger VT values during gait are associated with worse PROMs, suggesting that an intervention to reduce VT might be an option for clinicians trying to improve PROMs.

The Relationship Between the Effects of Lateral Wedge Insoles and Kinematic Chain Dynamics Between the Hindfoot and Lower Leg in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Purpose We aim to determine whether kinematic chain dynamics of the hindfoot and lower leg are involved in the effect of a lateral wedge insole (LWI) on reducing lateral thrust among patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Participants and methods Eight patients with knee osteoarthritis were included in the study. Evaluation of the kinematic chain and gait analysis was performed using an inertial measurement unit (IMU). The dynamics of the kinematic chain were calculated as linear regression coefficients of the external rotation angle of the lower leg relative to the inversion angle of the hindfoot during repeated inversion and eversion of the foot in the standing position (kinematic chain ratio (KCR)). Walk tests were performed under four conditions: barefoot (BF), neutral insole (NI) with an incline of 0 degrees, and LWI with an incline of approximately 5 and 10 degrees (5LWI and 10LWI, respectively). Results The mean (± standard deviation (SD)) KCR was 1.4 ± 0.5. The KCR was significantly correlated with the change in 5LWI lateral thrust acceleration relative to BF (r = 0.74). A significant correlation was also observed between changes in the hindfoot evolution angle and lower leg internal rotation angle with a 10LWI with respect to BF and NI, and changes in lateral thrust acceleration. Conclusion The results of this study suggest that the kinematic chain is involved in the effects of an LWI in patients with knee osteoarthritis.