Comparisons of the short-term effectiveness and safety of surgical treatment for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Surgical outcomes including visual improvement after glaucoma surgery in patients with neovascular glaucoma

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors affecting surgical outcomes, including visual acuity (VA) improvement, after glaucoma surgery in patients with neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

Methods

The medical records of 116 patients (116 eyes) with NVG who had undergone trabeculectomy or Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was surgical success at 6 postoperative months, defined as sufficient intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (IOP ≤21 mmHg, ≥20% reduction, regardless of topical medication use) without additional glaucoma surgery, hypotony, or progression to no light perception. Success was categorized as complete or qualified based on whether an improvement in VA was observed in addition to the abovementioned definition.

Results

The complete and qualified success rates at 6 months were 44.6% and 92.2%, respectively. Age (p = 0.001), preoperative best-corrected VA (p = 0.031), duration of decreased VA (p = 0.001), closed-angle status (p = 0.013), and etiology (p = 0.007) differed significantly between the groups with and without complete success. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; p = 0.026), duration of decreased VA (OR 1.05; p = 0.016), and 360° closed-angle status (OR 3.27; p = 0.031) were risk factors for surgical failure according to the complete success criteria, but not the qualified success criteria.

Conclusions

Patients with NVG showed improved visual prognosis and successful IOP reduction after glaucoma surgery at a relatively younger age if the duration of visual loss was not prolonged and the angle status was not completely closed.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents combined with different delivery methods for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

DESIGN

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN and Chinese databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science Periodical Database (Wanfang Database), VIP Journal Integration Platform and China Biology Medicine Database were searched from inception to 5 September 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the treatment of NVG using different anti-VEGF agents combined with various methods of drug administration, without any language limitations. All patients included underwent panretinal laser photocoagulation and there were no restrictions on prior glaucoma surgery.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety and rank priority of anti-VEGF regimens. The source of heterogeneity and the related factors affecting the stability of the results were also explored. CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) was used to assess the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 17 RCTs involving a total of 1311 eyes from 1228 patients. We examined five different treatment regimens, which used three different anti-VEGF drugs. The following treatments showed a significant decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with the control group at 1 month after glaucoma surgery: simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection of conbercept (ICCIVC) (mean difference (MD)=-11.56, 95% credible interval (CrI) -20.8 to -2.24), intravitreal injection of conbercept (MD=-8.88, 95% CrI -13.93 to -3.78), intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (MD=-7.62, 95% CrI -10.91 to -4.33) and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab IVB) (MD=-5.51, 95% CrI -10.79 to -0.35). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis indicated that ICCIVC (82.0%) may be the most effective regimen in reducing IOP. In terms of safety, there were no statistically significant differences among the interventions. According to the SUCRA analysis, ICCIVC (68.0%) was considered the safest choice with the fewest complications. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses showed that mean age was the main source of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the study results.

CONCLUSION

ICCIVC was more effective and safer than other anti-VEGF regimens for NVG. Simultaneous intravitreal and intracameral injection was found to be the best route of administration, and conbercept was found to be the superior drug selection when compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022309676.

Trabeculectomy with concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of concurrent intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C (MMC) in neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

METHODS

Patients with NVG who underwent trabeculectomy with concurrent IVB (group 1) and those who underwent IVB sequentially, followed by trabeculectomy with MMC (group 2) in 1-2 weeks between January 2021 and August 2022, were included in this retrospective hospital-based study. The need for medications for intraocular pressure (IOP) control at 6 months in the two groups was the primary outcome measured and compared between the groups. The association of the need for medications postoperatively with clinical variables was assessed using stepwise multivariate regression statistics.

RESULTS

We finally included 40 patients ( n = 12 in group 1, n = 28 in group 2) with no significant differences in presenting age between groups. The IOP at 1 day and 1 week were not significantly different between groups though the IOP at 1, 3, and 6 months. IOP was lower in group 1 eyes with the 6-month IOP, being significantly lower in group 1, P = 0.05. Three eyes in group 1 and 11 eyes in group 2 required anti-glaucoma medications in the postoperative period. Multivariate regression identified preoperative IVB >3 (β =0.7, P < 0.001) and recurrent vitreous hemorrhage (β = 0.7, P = 0.004) as prognostic factors ( R2 = 40.6%) determining the need for anti-glaucoma medication (AGM) postoperatively in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent IVB with trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C is a feasible alternative in patients with NVG with refractory high-presenting IOP. This may serve to address raised IOP as well as retinal ischemia, thereby improving surgical success rates in the most challenging NVG cases.

Clinical Efficacy of Preoperative and Intraoperative Intravitreal Ranibizumab as Adjuvant Therapy of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Combined with Vitrectomy in the Management of Neovascular Glaucoma with Diabetic Vitreous Hemorrhage

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is a devastating ocular disease with poor prognosis. Intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) has been used as adjuvant therapy of surgical interventions preoperatively or intraoperatively. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of combined IVR as adjuvant therapy in treating NVG with vitreous hemorrhage (VH) in PDR. A total of 39 NVG patients with VH (39 eyes) received IVR 3 to 5 days before surgery, and then they were assigned to either pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) + Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation (Group 1, n = 22) or PPV + AGV implantation + intraoperative IVR (Group 2, n = 17). Patients were followed up for at least 9 months. Intraocular pressure (IOP), anti-glaucoma medications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical success rates and postoperative complications were compared. Results showed that IOP decreased promptly after surgery and was notably maintained at a mid-term follow-up in both groups, and no significant differences were observed (all p > 0.05). Additional intraoperative IVR significantly reduced postoperative recurrent VH and iris neovascularization (p = 0.047, p = 0.025, respectively). There was no remarkable difference in postoperative anti-glaucoma medications, BCVA and complications between two groups (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, preoperative and intraoperative IVR as adjuvant therapy of AGV implantation combined with PPV could be a safe and effective treatment for NVG with VH in PDR. An additional intraoperative anti-VEGF injection could significantly reduce postoperative VH and iris neovascularization.

Outcomes of vitrectomy, complete pan-retinal photocoagulation, and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation surgery after anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular glaucoma

Purpose

To establish a comprehensive treatment strategy and evaluate the efficacy of combination of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), endoscopic pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP), and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) surgery for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) patients.

Methods

This retrospective study included 30 patients (30 eyes) who were suffering from NVG and treated with PPV & PRP & ECP (ECP group, 16 eyes), or Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation (Ahmed group, 14 eyes). The intraocular pressure (IOP), number of postoperative anti-glaucoma medications, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), successful rate of surgery, and postoperative complications were recorded and statistically analyzed at the time points of preoperative, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months after operation.

Results

An obvious reduction in IOP and number of postoperative anti-glaucoma medications were observed in both the ECP group and Ahmed group after operation (P ​< ​0.05), and the ECP group showed a significantly lower IOP compared to the Ahmed group at the 6-months (P ​= ​0.014) and 12-months (P ​= ​0.047) postoperative time points, while there was no significant difference of medication number between the two groups except for 1-day after surgery. The BCVA showed no marked difference between the two groups preoperatively and postoperatively (P ​> ​0.05), while it was significantly improved in ECP group at 3-months (P ​= ​0.001), 6-months (P ​= ​0.004), and 12-months (P ​= ​0.010) time points comparing with preoperative BCVA. The surgical success rates in ECP group were also slightly higher than Ahmed group. And the complications after operation showed no marked differences.

Conclusions

The comprehensive treatment of PPV, endoscopic PRP, and ECP surgery for NVG patients after anti-VEGF injection can control IOP effectively and be friendly to patients' BCVA without obvious serious complications throughout a 12-months follow-up period.