From basic to advanced computerised intravenous to oral switch for paracetamol and antibiotics: an interrupted time series analysis

Evaluation and implementation of optimized antimicrobial dosing strategies in obese and underweight patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop and implement dosing recommendations for antimicrobials in obese and underweight patients within an academic hospital, and assess their impact on antibiotic prescribing.

METHODS

A multi-step approach project was performed. First, obese and underweight patient prevalence and antimicrobial prescription frequency was determined in a point prevalence study. Second and third, a literature review and e-survey provided dosing evidence. Fourth, a consensus meeting was organized to formulate dosing recommendations. Fifth, these were implemented in our clinical validation service as six clinical rules continuously screening patients' records for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). Uptake was evaluated by documenting the number of advices and acceptance rate. Last, an interrupted time series analysis (ITS) compared pre- and post-implementation periods to measure the impact of the intervention on residual PIPs/day. A residual PIP was defined as a PIP which persisted up to 48 h.

RESULTS

First, 41% of 15.896 hospitalized patients received antimicrobials over 20 days; of which 12% were obese and 9% underweight. Antibiotics were predominantly prescribed according to standard dosing regimens, adjusted to renal function. Next, six dosing recommendations, derived from literature, survey, and consensus, were implemented. In the fifth step, during an 18-week period, 219 advices were given, with 86% acceptance rate. Last, in the ITS analysis, at preintervention, a median of 75% residual PIPs/day existed, reduced to 0% postintervention. Use of clinical rules resulted in a significant immediate 84% relative reduction in residual PIPs (95% CI 0.55-0.94).

CONCLUSION

After conducting a literature review, e-survey, and seeking consensus from a panel of experts, dosing recommendations for antimicrobial treatment in both obese and underweight patients were developed. These recommendations have been successfully implemented into clinical practice, addressing the specific needs of these patient populations.

Bedside check of medication appropriateness (BED-CMA) as a risk-based tool for bedside clinical pharmacy services: A proof-of-concept study at the trauma surgery ward

Background

Bedside clinical pharmacy prevents drug-related problems, but is not feasible in many countries due to limited resources. Hence, clinical rules using structural information in the electronic health record can help identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). We aimed to develop and implement a risk-based clinical pharmacy service and evaluate its impact on prescribing at the trauma surgery ward.

Methods

The proportion of residual PIPs per day, i.e. the number of PIPs that persisted up to 24 h after pharmacist intervention divided by the number of PIPs at T0, was evaluated before and after implementation of the intervention in an interrupted time series analysis. The pre-intervention cohort received usual pharmacy services, i.e. a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee. Fifteen clinical rules, targeting antimicrobial, anticoagulant and analgesic therapy were implemented in the post-intervention period. The pre-intervention period was compared to two post-intervention scenarios: A) clinical rule alerts reviewed by a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee; and B) clinical rule alerts reviewed daily for approximately 1 h by a clinical pharmacist trainee.

Results

Pre-intervention, a median proportion of 67% (range 0%-100%) residual PIPs per day was observed. Scenario A showed an immediate relative reduction of 14% (p = 0.72) and scenario B a significant immediate relative reduction of 85% (p = 0.0015) in residual PIPs per day. In scenario A, recommendations were provided for 19% of clinical rule alerts, of which 67% was accepted by the surgeon within 24 h. In scenario B, recommendations were given for 56% of alerts, of which 84% was accepted.

Conclusions

Using clinical rules is an effective approach to organize bedside clinical pharmacy services and improves prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Advanced training and daily follow-up of the clinical rules are two requirements to be considered.

End-users feedback and perceptions associated with the implementation of a clinical-rule based Check of Medication Appropriateness service

Background

To support appropriate prescribing hospital-wide, the ‘Check of Medication Appropriateness’ (CMA) service was implemented at the University Hospitals Leuven. The CMA concerns a clinical rule based and pharmacist-led medication review service. The aim of this study was to explore both physicians’ and pharmacists’ feedback on the optimised CMA service to further improve the service.

Methods

An anonymous e-questionnaire was sent to all physicians active in the University Hospitals Leuven (n = 1631) and to all clinical pharmacists performing the CMA service (n = 16). Feedback was collected using multiple choice questions. During a 5-month period, physicians were also contacted in case of non-acceptance of recommendations to investigate barriers affecting implementation. Thematic analysis was performed and additional acceptance after telephone contact within 24 h was registered.

Results

A total of 119 physicians (7.3%) and 16 pharmacists (100%) completed the e-questionnaire. The overall service was assessed as clinically relevant to highly relevant by 77.7% of physicians. The main reasons for non-acceptance of recommendations were related to workload, work environment and time constraints. About two thirds (66.3%) of initially not-accepted recommendations were accepted after phone contact. A nearly full consensus was reached among pharmacists (15/16) on the centralised CMA being complementary to current clinical pharmacy activities. Two major barriers were reported by pharmacists: (1) too limited time allocation and (2) a large number of irrelevant alerts.

Conclusions

The CMA was perceived as clinically relevant by the majority of end-users. Acceptance rate of pharmaceutical recommendations was further increased by calling the physician. Increasing the specificity of clinical rules in the future is imperative.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01921-7.